The United States has, by far, the highest rate of privately owned guns per inhabitant, with around *** guns per 100 inhabitants. Deadly shootings have become a significant problem in the country. Yemen, the country with the second-highest gun ownership rate worldwide, only has half of the U.S. rate.

The Small Arms Survey 2017 provides estimates of the total number of civilian-owned guns in a country. It then calculates the number per 100 persons. This number for a country does not indicate the percentage of the population that owns guns. This is because individuals can own more than one gun.

COLUMN DESCRIPTION

• 'region': region of the owner
• 'subregion': subregion of the owner
• 'country': country of the owner
• 'civil_firearms': Estimate of civilian firearms per 100 persons
• 'population': population
• 'firearm_poss': Estimate of firearms in civilian possession
• 'reg_firearms': registered firearms
• 'unreg_firearms': unregistered firearms

Photo by Timothy Dykes on Unsplash

Texas was the state with the highest number of registered weapons in the United States in 2024, with 1,136,732 firearms. Rhode Island, on the other hand, had the least, with 4,895 registered firearms. Gun laws in the United States Gun ownership in the U.S. is protected by the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution, which allows citizens to own firearms and form a militia if necessary. Outside of the 2nd Amendment, gun laws in the U.S. vary from state to state, and gun owners are subject to the laws of the state they are currently in, not necessarily the state they live in. For example, if concealed carry is allowed in a gun owner’s state of residence but not in the state they are traveling in, the owner is subject to the law of the state they are traveling in. Civilian-owned firearms The United States is estimated to have the highest rate of civilian-owned firearms in the world, more than double that of Yemen, which has the second-highest gun ownership rate. Unfortunately, along with high gun ownership rates comes a higher number of homicides by firearm, which was about 13,529 homicides in 2023.

This statistic illustrates the estimated rate of civilian-owned firearms per 100 residents in 2017, by country. In that year, there were an estimated ***** civilian-owned firearms per 100 residents in the United States.

The share of American households owning at least one firearm has remained relatively steady since 1972, hovering between ** percent and ** percent. In 2024, about ** percent of U.S. households had at least one gun in their possession. Additional information on firearms in the United States Firearms command a higher degree of cultural significance in the United States than any other country in the world. Since the inclusion of the right to bear arms in the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, firearms have held symbolic power beyond their already obvious material power. Despite many Americans being proud gun-owners, a large movement exists within the country in opposition to the freedom afforded to those in possession of these potentially deadly weapons. Those opposed to current gun regulation have sourced their anger from the large number of deaths due to firearms in the country, as well as the high frequency of gun violence apparent in comparison to other developed countries. Furthermore, the United States has fallen victim to a number of mass shootings in the last two decades, most of which have raised questions over the ease at which a person can obtain a firearm. Although this movement holds a significant position in the public political discourse of the United States, meaningful change regarding the legislation dictating the ownership of firearms has not occurred. Critics have pointed to the influence possessed by the National Rifle Association through their lobbying of public officials. The National Rifle Association also lobbies for the interests of firearm manufacturing in the United States, which has continued to rise since a fall in the early 2000s.

In recent years, gun violence in the United States has become an alarmingly common occurrence. From 2016, there has been over ****** homicides by firearm in the U.S. each year and firearms have been found to make up the majority of murder weapons in the country by far, demonstrating increasing rates of gun violence occurring throughout the nation. As of 2025, Mississippi was the state with the highest gun violence rate per 100,000 residents in the United States, at **** percent, followed by Louisiana, at **** percent. In comparison, Massachusetts had a gun violence rate of *** percent, the lowest out of all the states. The importance of gun laws Gun laws in the United States vary from state to state, which has been found to affect the differing rates of gun violence throughout the country. Fewer people die by gun violence in states where gun safety laws have been passed, while gun violence rates remain high in states where gun usage is easily permitted and even encouraged. In addition, some states suffer from high rates of gun violence despite having strong gun safety laws due to gun trafficking, as traffickers can distribute firearms illegally past state lines. The right to bear arms Despite evidence from other countries demonstrating that strict gun control measures reduce rates of gun violence, the United States has remained reluctant to enact gun control laws. This can largely be attributed to the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which states that citizens have the right to bear arms. Consequently, gun control has become a highly partisan issue in the U.S., with ** percent of Democrats believing that it was more important to limit gun ownership while ** percent of Republicans felt that it was more important to protect the right of Americans to own guns.

The civilian guns and bullets market exhibits robust growth potential, driven by factors such as increasing personal safety concerns, a rise in recreational shooting activities, and the expanding popularity of hunting. While precise market size figures are unavailable, based on industry reports and comparable markets, we can reasonably estimate the 2025 market size to be approximately $15 billion USD. This substantial market is expected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 5% from 2025 to 2033. This growth trajectory is influenced by several key factors including rising disposable incomes in developing economies leading to increased purchasing power for recreational goods, and advancements in firearm technology, offering consumers more sophisticated and appealing options. However, stringent government regulations regarding firearm ownership and sales, coupled with increasing social awareness surrounding gun violence, present significant constraints to market expansion. The market is segmented by various firearm types (handguns, rifles, shotguns), ammunition calibers, and distribution channels (retailers, online platforms). Leading manufacturers such as FN Herstal, Remington Arms, Beretta, Heckler & Koch, and others, are actively engaged in product innovation and strategic partnerships to maintain a competitive edge. Regional variations in market size and growth rate are expected, with North America and Europe anticipated to represent major market shares, driven by established gun cultures and higher per capita spending on firearms. The long-term outlook remains positive, contingent upon regulatory changes and evolving consumer preferences within this dynamic industry. Continued emphasis on safety regulations and responsible gun ownership will be crucial to shaping future market growth. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the civilian guns and bullets market, a sector characterized by significant growth and evolving dynamics. We delve into market concentration, key trends, dominant regions, product insights, and future projections, offering actionable intelligence for industry stakeholders.

In the United States in 2023, ** percent of Republicans reported that they owned at least one gun, and ** percent said that they lived in a household with a gun. In comparison, only ** percent of Democrats owned at least one gun, and ** percent lived in a gun household. Who are gun owners? In 2022, significantly more Democrats were in favor of limiting gun ownership in comparison to Republicans. On the other hand, more Republicans were in favor of protecting the right to own guns in comparison to Democrats. When examined by education level, respondents who said they only had some college, but no degree were the most likely to have said that there is at least one gun in their household. However, nearly a ******* of Americans over 18 years old said that they rarely carry a gun on their person. Republicans vs Democrats Debate The gun control debate in the United States has been a highly contested one. In light of frequent mass shootings, gun control laws have become the center of policy discussions. Democratic politicians tend to put significant emphasis on their gun control policies and are overall more in favor of stricter gun control laws and want more background checks for those who want to purchase a gun. However, Republicans tend to work in favor of gun rights.

Context

The Gun Violence Archive is an online archive of gun violence incidents collected from over 2,000 media, law enforcement, government and commercial sources daily in an effort to provide near-real time data about the results of gun violence. GVA in an independent data collection and research group with no affiliation with any advocacy organization.

Content

This dataset includes files that separate gun violence incidents by category, including deaths and injuries of children and teens, and a collection of mass shootings.

Inspiration

• What has been the trend of gun violence in the past few years?
• What states have the highest incidents per capita per year? How has this metric changed over time?
• Are officer involved shootings on the rise? Where are they most concentrated? Do they correlate with the rates of accidental deaths and mass shootings?

Acknowledgements

This dataset is owned by the Gun Violence Archive, and can be accessed in its original form here.

Global sales of massage guns are valued at USD 1.5 billion in 2025 and are expected to rise to USD 3.7 billion by 2035 at an 8.1% CAGR.

Metric	Value
Industry Size (2025E)	USD 1.5 billion
Industry Value (2035F)	USD 3.7 billion
CAGR (2025 to 2035)	8.1%

Top 5 Countries Driving the Massage Guns Market

Country	United States
Population (millions)	345.4
Estimated Per Capita Spending (USD)	15.20

Country	China
Population (millions)	1,419.3
Estimated Per Capita Spending (USD)	8.30

Country	Germany
Population (millions)	84.1
Estimated Per Capita Spending (USD)	12.40

Country	United Kingdom
Population (millions)	68.3
Estimated Per Capita Spending (USD)	11.10

Country	Japan
Population (millions)	123.3
Estimated Per Capita Spending (USD)	9.70

Massage Guns Market - Global Country-Wise Outlook

Country	CAGR (2025 to 2035)
United States	7.5%

Country	CAGR (2025 to 2035)
United Kingdom	7.2%

Country	CAGR (2025 to 2035)
Germany	7.4%

Country	CAGR (2025 to 2035)
India	8.1%

Country	CAGR (2025 to 2035)
China	8.5%

Competition Outlook

Company Name	Estimated Market Share (%)
Therabody	15-20%
Hyperice	10-15%
TimTam	5-10%
DMS	5-10%
Other Companies	50-65%

Number and percentage of homicide victims, by type of firearm used to commit the homicide (total firearms; handgun; rifle or shotgun; other firearm-like weapons; firearm, type of firearm is unknown), Canada, 1974 to 2024.

Forehead Thermometer Gun Market Outlook

The global forehead thermometer gun market size was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 2.5 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.1%. This growth is primarily driven by the rising demand for non-contact temperature measurement devices, spurred by increasing health awareness and the ongoing need for infection control, particularly in light of global health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

The growing concern for hygiene and safety in medical settings has contributed significantly to the escalating demand for forehead thermometer guns. In healthcare environments where minimizing the risk of cross-contamination is critical, these non-contact devices offer a highly sanitary solution for monitoring body temperature. Additionally, the healthcare sector globally is undergoing rapid advancements and expansion, thereby driving the adoption of more sophisticated and convenient medical devices like forehead thermometer guns.

Furthermore, technological advancements in thermometer gun functionalities, such as faster readings, better accuracy, and user-friendly interfaces, have made these devices incredibly appealing to a broad range of users. Enhanced features, including memory storage, backlit displays, and contactless operation, are becoming standard, thereby fueling market growth. The increasing availability and affordability of these advanced devices have further amplified their adoption across various segments.

The market growth is also catalyzed by the rising prevalence of infectious diseases, necessitating rigorous and frequent temperature monitoring in public spaces like airports, shopping malls, and workplaces. Governments and private organizations are increasingly investing in health monitoring solutions, which has significantly boosted the market for forehead thermometer guns. The convenience and rapid results offered by these devices make them indispensable tools in managing public health.

Regionally, North America and Asia Pacific are expected to dominate the forehead thermometer gun market owing to strong healthcare infrastructure, high health awareness, and significant investments in healthcare technologies. North America, with its high per capita healthcare expenditure and established market players, continues to lead the market. Meanwhile, Asia Pacific is experiencing rapid growth due to increasing population density, improving healthcare facilities, and the rising incidence of infectious diseases.

Product Type Analysis

The forehead thermometer gun market can be segmented by product type into infrared forehead thermometer guns and digital forehead thermometer guns. Infrared forehead thermometer guns are particularly favored for their ability to provide quick, accurate, and non-contact temperature readings. These devices use infrared sensors to measure the temperature from the forehead without any physical contact, making them ideal for use in situations where hygiene and safety are of paramount importance. Their application is widespread in hospitals, clinics, and other medical settings due to their reliability and ease of use.

Digital forehead thermometer guns, on the other hand, also offer non-contact temperature measurement but use different technology. These devices often incorporate advanced digital sensors and display features that make them user-friendly and convenient for at-home monitoring. Digital thermometer guns have gained popularity among households and small clinics due to their affordability and ease of use. The integration of digital features such as memory recall, multiple user settings, and illuminated displays further enhances their appeal, particularly in home care settings.

The infrared segment is expected to maintain a dominant share of the market owing to its widespread use in professional healthcare settings. However, the digital segment is anticipated to witness faster growth during the forecast period, driven by increasing demand from household users seeking reliable and easy-to-use medical devices. The technological advancements in digital thermometer guns that offer enhanced accuracy and user convenience are playing a crucial role in this segment's growth.

Both product types are continuously evolving with advancements in sensor technology and ergonomic design. Manufacturers are focusing on improving the accuracy and response time of these devices, which is essential for both medical and non-medical applications. Additionally, the trend of integrating

Information about GDP per capita; GDP growth; total public expenditure as percent of GDP; percent public consumption; gini coefficient for equivalent disposable income; percent imports from developing countries; inflation; percent social security transfers; percent unionized; percent unemployed; female labor force participation rate; percent employed in industry; percent employed in agriculture; percent employed in service sector; percent of population aged 0-14 years; percent of population aged 15-64 years; percent of population aged 65 years or more for 16 industrialized countries during the period 1966-1994.

Purpose:

Find the reason to why income distribution change in industrialized countries.

Ishikawa gun furudono Town(Ishikawa gun furudono Machi)'s Tax debtor (per capita basis) is 2,449person which is the 1460th highest in Japan (by City). It also ranks 45th in Fukushima Prefecture, with 0.26% share of the entire Fukushima. Transition Graphs and Comparison chart between Ishikawa gun furudono Town and Myozai gun kamiyama Town(Tokushima) and Niseko Town(Hokkai do)(Closest City in Population) are available. Various data can be downloaded and output in csv format for use in EXCEL free of charge.

THIS DATASET WAS LAST UPDATED AT 7:11 AM EASTERN ON DEC. 1

OVERVIEW

2019 had the most mass killings since at least the 1970s, according to the Associated Press/USA TODAY/Northeastern University Mass Killings Database.

In all, there were 45 mass killings, defined as when four or more people are killed excluding the perpetrator. Of those, 33 were mass shootings . This summer was especially violent, with three high-profile public mass shootings occurring in the span of just four weeks, leaving 38 killed and 66 injured.

A total of 229 people died in mass killings in 2019.

The AP's analysis found that more than 50% of the incidents were family annihilations, which is similar to prior years. Although they are far less common, the 9 public mass shootings during the year were the most deadly type of mass murder, resulting in 73 people's deaths, not including the assailants.

One-third of the offenders died at the scene of the killing or soon after, half from suicides.

About this Dataset

The Associated Press/USA TODAY/Northeastern University Mass Killings database tracks all U.S. homicides since 2006 involving four or more people killed (not including the offender) over a short period of time (24 hours) regardless of weapon, location, victim-offender relationship or motive. The database includes information on these and other characteristics concerning the incidents, offenders, and victims.

The AP/USA TODAY/Northeastern database represents the most complete tracking of mass murders by the above definition currently available. Other efforts, such as the Gun Violence Archive or Everytown for Gun Safety may include events that do not meet our criteria, but a review of these sites and others indicates that this database contains every event that matches the definition, including some not tracked by other organizations.

This data will be updated periodically and can be used as an ongoing resource to help cover these events.

Using this Dataset

To get basic counts of incidents of mass killings and mass shootings by year nationwide, use these queries:

Mass killings by year

Mass shootings by year

To get these counts just for your state:

Filter killings by state

Definition of "mass murder"

Mass murder is defined as the intentional killing of four or more victims by any means within a 24-hour period, excluding the deaths of unborn children and the offender(s). The standard of four or more dead was initially set by the FBI.

This definition does not exclude cases based on method (e.g., shootings only), type or motivation (e.g., public only), victim-offender relationship (e.g., strangers only), or number of locations (e.g., one). The time frame of 24 hours was chosen to eliminate conflation with spree killers, who kill multiple victims in quick succession in different locations or incidents, and to satisfy the traditional requirement of occurring in a “single incident.”

Offenders who commit mass murder during a spree (before or after committing additional homicides) are included in the database, and all victims within seven days of the mass murder are included in the victim count. Negligent homicides related to driving under the influence or accidental fires are excluded due to the lack of offender intent. Only incidents occurring within the 50 states and Washington D.C. are considered.

Methodology

Project researchers first identified potential incidents using the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR). Homicide incidents in the SHR were flagged as potential mass murder cases if four or more victims were reported on the same record, and the type of death was murder or non-negligent manslaughter.

Cases were subsequently verified utilizing media accounts, court documents, academic journal articles, books, and local law enforcement records obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Each data point was corroborated by multiple sources, which were compiled into a single document to assess the quality of information.

In case(s) of contradiction among sources, official law enforcement or court records were used, when available, followed by the most recent media or academic source.

Case information was subsequently compared with every other known mass murder database to ensure reliability and validity. Incidents listed in the SHR that could not be independently verified were excluded from the database.

Project researchers also conducted extensive searches for incidents not reported in the SHR during the time period, utilizing internet search engines, Lexis-Nexis, and Newspapers.com. Search terms include: [number] dead, [number] killed, [number] slain, [number] murdered, [number] homicide, mass murder, mass shooting, massacre, rampage, family killing, familicide, and arson murder. Offender, victim, and location names were also directly searched when available.

This project started at USA TODAY in 2012.

Contacts

Contact AP Data Editor Justin Myers with questions, suggestions or comments about this dataset at jmyers@ap.org. The Northeastern University researcher working with AP and USA TODAY is Professor James Alan Fox, who can be reached at j.fox@northeastern.edu or 617-416-4400.

The global sports pistol market, encompassing competitive shooting and recreational activities, is experiencing robust growth. While precise market size figures for 2025 aren't provided, considering the typical size of the firearms market and growth trends in related sectors, a reasonable estimate for the 2025 market value could be in the range of $2.5 billion USD. This market is driven by increasing participation in shooting sports, both competitively and recreationally, fueled by a rising global population and increased disposable incomes in many developing nations. Further growth is fueled by technological advancements in pistol design, leading to improved accuracy, ergonomics, and overall performance. The 25m Rapid Fire Pistol and 10m Air Pistol segments are major contributors, benefiting from dedicated training facilities and competitive leagues worldwide. However, stringent regulations regarding firearm ownership and use in various regions, along with safety concerns, act as significant restraints on market expansion. The market is also seeing a shift towards more technologically advanced pistols incorporating features like improved sights and enhanced trigger mechanisms, catering to both professional and amateur shooters. Regional differences exist, with North America and Europe currently holding significant market shares due to established shooting cultures and higher per capita income levels. However, the Asia-Pacific region is projected to witness substantial growth over the forecast period driven by increasing participation in shooting sports, particularly in countries like India and China. The forecast period (2025-2033) is expected to witness continued expansion, driven by the aforementioned factors. A conservative Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) estimate of 5% is feasible, resulting in a projected market value exceeding $3.7 billion by 2033. Key players like American Outdoor Brands, Beretta, Colt's, and others are actively investing in research and development to enhance product offerings and cater to evolving consumer preferences. Maintaining a strong focus on safety, compliance with regulations, and continuous innovation will be key to success within this dynamic and competitive market landscape. Furthermore, strategic partnerships with shooting ranges and associations, coupled with targeted marketing campaigns, will be crucial for capturing a larger share of the burgeoning market.

In the United States, Black people have higher rates of gun homicide than White people across all age groups. As of 2022, gun homicide rates were highest among Black people aged between 15 and 24 years, at ***** gun homicides per 100,000 of the population. In comparison, there were only **** gun homicides per 100,000 of the White population within this age range. However, the risk for gun homicide was greatest among all adolescents and adults between the ages of 15 to 44 in that year. The impact of guns on young Americans In the last few years, firearms have become the leading cause of death for American children and teenagers aged one to 19 years old, accounting for more deaths than car crashes and diseases. School shootings also remain on the rise recently, with the U.S. recording ** times as many school shootings than other high-income nations from 2009 to 2018. Black students in particular experience a disproportionately high number of school shootings relative to their population, and K-12 teachers at schools made up mostly of students of color are more likely to report feeling afraid that they or their students would be a victim of attack or harm. The right to bear arms Despite increasingly high rates of gun-related violence, gun ownership remains a significant part of American culture, largely due to the fact that the right to bear arms is written into the U.S. Constitution. Although firearms are the most common murder weapon used in the U.S., accounting for approximately ****** homicides in 2022, almost **** of American households have at least one firearm in their possession. Consequently, it is evident that firearms remain easily accessible nationwide, even though gun laws may vary from state to state. However, the topic of gun control still causes political controversy, as the majority of Republicans agree that it is more important to protect the right of Americans to own guns, while Democrats are more inclined to believe that it is more important to limit gun ownership.

There has been little research on United States homicide rates from a long-term perspective, primarily because there has been no consistent data series on a particular place preceding the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR), which began its first full year in 1931. To fill this research gap, this project created a data series that spans two centuries on homicides per capita for the city of Los Angeles. The goal was to create a site-specific, individual-based data series that could be used to examine major social shifts related to homicide, such as mass immigration, urban growth, war, demographic changes, and changes in laws. The basic approach to the data collection was to obtain the best possible estimate of annual counts and the most complete information on individual homicides. Data were derived from multiple sources, including Los Angeles court records, as well as annual reports of the coroner and daily newspapers. Part 1 (Annual Homicides and Related Data) variables include Los Angeles County annual counts of homicides, counts of female victims, method of killing such as drowning, suffocating, or strangling, and the homicide rate. Part 2 (Individual Homicide Data) variables include the date and place of the murder, the age, sex, race, and place of birth of the offender and victim, type of weapon used, and source of data.

Handguns are by far the most common murder weapon used in the United States, accounting for 7,159 homicides in 2023. This is followed by firearms of an unstated type, with 5,295 cases in that year. Why do murders happen in the U.S.? While most of the time the circumstances of murders in the U.S. remain unknown, homicides due to narcotics come in as the second most common circumstance – making them more common than, for example, gang killings. Despite these gruesome facts, the violent crime rate has fallen significantly since 1990, and the United States is much safer than it was in the 1980s and 1990s. Knife crime vs disease: Leading causes of death The death rate in the U.S. had hovered around the same level since 1990 until there was a large increase due to the COVID-19 pandemic in recent years. Heart disease, cancer, and accidents were the three leading causes of death in the country in 2022. The rate of death from heart disease is significantly higher than the homicide rate in the United States, at 167.2 deaths per 100,000 population compared to a 5.7 homicides per 100,000. Given just 1,562 murders were caused by knife crime, it is fair to say that heart disease is a far bigger killer in the U.S.

Abstract: Although recent research has yielded some determining elements to civil war, the influence of political factors on internal conflicts remains disputed. This article presents a critical review of the most widely used indices of democracy in civil war studies, and suggests that the competitiveness of the executive power can be a useful measure for quantitative conflict research. The paper also analyses, by means of statistical regression, the relationship between the competitiveness in the executive recruitment and civil war incidence from 1976 to 2000. The findings indicate that both single-candidate and multi-party elections reduce the incidence of civil war. Furthermore, the results lend support to the hypotheses put forward by recent literature that ethnic fractionalisation, mountainous terrain, large population and centralised political systems significantly heighten the risk of incidence of civil war, while high GDP per capita and economic growth decrease the likelihood of internal conflicts. Article: http://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/view/37638/21156