14 datasets found
  1. Most popular database management systems worldwide 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Most popular database management systems worldwide 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/809750/worldwide-popularity-ranking-database-management-systems/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 19, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jun 2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of June 2024, the most popular database management system (DBMS) worldwide was Oracle, with a ranking score of 1244.08; MySQL and Microsoft SQL server rounded out the top three. Although the database management industry contains some of the largest companies in the tech industry, such as Microsoft, Oracle and IBM, a number of free and open-source DBMSs such as PostgreSQL and MariaDB remain competitive. Database Management Systems As the name implies, DBMSs provide a platform through which developers can organize, update, and control large databases. Given the business world’s growing focus on big data and data analytics, knowledge of SQL programming languages has become an important asset for software developers around the world, and database management skills are seen as highly desirable. In addition to providing developers with the tools needed to operate databases, DBMS are also integral to the way that consumers access information through applications, which further illustrates the importance of the software.

  2. Popularity distribution of database management systems worldwide 2024, by...

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Popularity distribution of database management systems worldwide 2024, by model [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1131595/worldwide-popularity-database-management-systems-category/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 19, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jun 2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of December 2022, relational database management systems (RDBMS) were the most popular type of DBMS, accounting for a 72 percent popularity share. The most popular RDBMS in the world has been reported as Oracle, while MySQL and Microsoft SQL server rounded out the top three.

  3. Most used databases by companies worldwide 2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Jan 2, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Most used databases by companies worldwide 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1304901/databases-usage-by-companies-worldwide/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 2, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    World
    Description

    The most used database by companies worldwide in 2022 was Amazon Web Services. Additionally, 60 percent of respondents used Google Cloud Platform.

  4. Most popular database management systems in software companies in Russia...

    • statista.com
    Updated Oct 8, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Most popular database management systems in software companies in Russia 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1330732/most-popular-dbms-in-software-companies-russia/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 8, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Feb 2022 - May 2022
    Area covered
    Russia
    Description

    Approximately 82 percent of the surveyed software companies in Russia mentioned PostgreSQL, making it the most popular database management system (DBMS) in the period between February and May 2022. MS SQL and MySQL followed, having been mentioned by 47 percent and 41 percent of respondents, respectively.

  5. I

    In Memory Database Market Report

    • promarketreports.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Feb 5, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Pro Market Reports (2025). In Memory Database Market Report [Dataset]. https://www.promarketreports.com/reports/in-memory-database-market-8867
    Explore at:
    doc, ppt, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 5, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Pro Market Reports
    License

    https://www.promarketreports.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.promarketreports.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The global in-memory database market size was valued at USD 10.5643 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.19% during the forecast period (2025-2033). The growth of the market is attributed to the increasing adoption of in-memory databases in various industries to improve data processing speed and performance. In-memory databases store data in the computer's main memory (RAM) instead of on a physical disk, which allows for faster data access and retrieval. Key market drivers include the growing volume of data, the need for real-time data analysis, and the increasing adoption of cloud computing. The growing volume of data, often referred to as "big data," is a significant factor driving market growth. The need for real-time data analysis is another key driver, as in-memory databases can provide faster data access than traditional databases. The increasing adoption of cloud computing is also driving market growth, as cloud-based in-memory databases offer scalability and flexibility. Recent developments include: March 2023: SAP revealed SAP Datasphere, the company's next-gen data management system. It gives customers easy access to business-ready data across the data landscape. SAP also announced strategic agreements with top data and AI companies, including Collibra NV, Confluent Inc., Databricks Inc., and DataRobot Inc., to improve SAP Datasphere and allow organizations to build a unified data architecture that securely combines SAP software data and non-SAP data., June 2023: IBM has released a new tool to aid corporations in monitoring their carbon footprint pollution across cloud services and improve their sustainability as they move to hybrid and multi-cloud environments. The IBM Cloud Carbon Calculator, an AI-powered dashboard, is now available to everyone. It can help clients access emissions data for various IBM Cloud tasks, such as AI, high-performance computing (HPC), and financial services., SingleStoreDB for December 2022 was announced last year by IBM and SingleStore. With IBM introducing SingleStoreDB as a solution, businesses are now moving forward in their strategic relationship to deliver the quickest, most scalable data platform that supports data-intensive programs. For Azure, AWS, and Microsoft Azure marketplace, IBM has released SingleStoreDB as a service., In April 2022, McObject issued the eXtremeDB/rt database management system (DBMS) for Green Hills Software’s Integrity RTOS. The first-ever commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) real-time DBMS satisfying basic criteria of temporal and deterministic consistency in data is known as eXtremeDB/rt. It was initially conceived and built as an integrated in-memory database system for embedded systems., November 2022: Redis, provider of real-time in-memory databases, and Amazon Web Services have formed a multi-year strategic alliance. It is a networked open-source NoSQL system that stores data on disk for durability before moving it to DRAM as required. As such, it can be used as a message broker cache, streaming engine, or database., December 2022: The largest Indian stock exchange, National Stock Exchange, opted for Raima Database Manager (RDM) Workgroup 12.0 In-Memory System as its foundational component for upcoming versions of its trading platform front-end called National Exchange for Automated Trading (NEAT)., On January 13th, 2021, Oracle launched Oracle Database 21c – the latest version of the world’s leading converged database available on Oracle Cloud with the Always Free tier of Oracle Autonomous Database included. It includes more than two hundred new features, according to Oracle’s press release, including immutable blockchain tables; In-Database JavaScript; native JSON binary data type; AutoML for in-database machine learning (ML); persistent memory store; enhancements, including improvements regarding graph processing performance that support sharding, multitenant, and security., Stanford engineers have developed a new chip to increase the efficiency of AI computing in August 2022. Stanford engineers have created a more efficient and flexible AI chip that could bring the power of AI into tiny edge devices., In-Memory Database Market Segmentation,

    Relational

    NoSQL

    NewSQL

    ,

    Online Analytical Processing (OLAP)

    Online Transaction Processing (OLTP)

    ,

    Transaction

    Reporting

    Analytics

    ,

    North America

    US

    Canada

    Europe

    Germany

    France

    UK

    Italy

    Spain

    Rest of Europe

    Asia-Pacific

    China

    Japan

    India

    Australia

    South Korea

    Australia

    Rest of Asia-Pacific

    Rest of the World

    Middle East

    Africa

    Latin America

    , . Potential restraints include: Security And Data Privacy Concerns 26.

  6. Most commonly used database technologies among developers worldwide 2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Most commonly used database technologies among developers worldwide 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/794187/united-states-developer-survey-most-wanted-used-database-technologies/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 19, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    May 8, 2023 - May 19, 2023
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In 2023, over 45 percent of surveyed software developers worldwide reported using PostgreSQL, the highest share of any database technology. Other popular database tools among developers included MySQL and SQLite.

  7. f

    Descriptions of the included studied.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Apr 16, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Afsana Afroz; Bodrun Naher Siddiquea; Hasina Akhter Chowdhury; Timothy NW Jackson; Andrew D. Watt (2024). Descriptions of the included studied. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012080.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 16, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
    Authors
    Afsana Afroz; Bodrun Naher Siddiquea; Hasina Akhter Chowdhury; Timothy NW Jackson; Andrew D. Watt
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundSnakebite envenoming represents a significant and often neglected public health challenge, particularly in rural communities across tropical and subtropical regions. An estimated 1.2–5.5 million people are envenomed by snakebites annually. More than 125,000 of these bites are fatal, and 3–4 times as many results in disability/disfigurement. Despite its prevalence, collecting accurate epidemiological data on snakebite is challenging. This systematic review and meta-analysis collates global epidemiology data on snakebite morbidity and mortality.MethodsMedline, Embase, Cochrane and CINAHL Plus databases were searched for articles published between 2001–2022. Pooled incidence and mortality were obtained using random effects modelling, heterogeneity (I2) was tested, and sensitivity analyses performed. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed study quality.ResultsOut of the four databases, 5,312 articles were found. After removing duplicates, 3,953 articles were screened by title and abstract and 65 articles containing information on snakebite epidemiology, encompassing 663,460 snakebites, were selected for analysis. The people most at risk for snakebite were men (59%), engaged in agricultural labour (27.5%), and residing in rural areas (66.7%). More than half (57%) of the reported bites resulted in envenoming. Incidents occurred frequently in the summer season (38.5%), during daytime (56.7%), and bites were most often to the lower limb (56.4%). Envenoming severity was frequently mild (46.7%), treated in hospital (68.3%), and was treated with anti-venom (64.7%). The pooled global incidence and mortality was 69.4 /100,000 population (95%CI: 36.8 to 101.9) and 0.33/100,000 population (95%CI, 0.14 to 0.52) per year, respectively.Stratified by continents, Asia had the highest incidence of 130.7/100,000 population (95%CI: 48.3 to 213.1) while Europe has the lowest with 0.7/100,000 population (95%CI: -0.2 to 1.5). The highest mortality was reported in Asia at 0.96/100,000 population (95% CI: 0.22 to 1.70), and Africa 0.44/100,000 population (95%CI: -0.03 to 0.84). Incidence was highest among inhabitants of lower-middle-income countries 132.7/100,000 population (95%CI: 55.4 to 209.9) while mortality was highest in low-income countries at 0.85/100,000 population (95% CI: -0.06 to 2.31).ConclusionIncidence and mortality rates noted here highlight the global impact of snakebite and underscore the critical need to address the burden of snakebite envenoming. It also reveals that while reported snakebite incidence was higher in lower-middle-income countries, the burden of mortality was greatest among inhabitants of low-income countries, again emphasising the need for greater efforts to tackle this neglected tropical disease.

  8. Top cloud database vendors by funding worldwide 2021, by vendor

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 23, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Top cloud database vendors by funding worldwide 2021, by vendor [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1251520/top-cloud-database-vendors-by-funding/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 23, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jun 2021
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    By June 2021, Databricks received 1.9 billion U.S. dollars of funding. Importantly, cloud database companies offer specialized services via public cloud. By the end of 2022, 75 percent of databases are expected to be moved to the cloud. Additionally, spending on database software is forecast to amount to more than 100 billion U.S. dollars by 2025.

  9. f

    Outcomes and results of the included studies.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Feb 8, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Boram Lee; Chan-Young Kwon; Ye Ji Kim; Jae Hyun Kim; Kwan-Il Kim; Beom-Joon Lee; Jun-Hwan Lee (2024). Outcomes and results of the included studies. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296898.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 8, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Boram Lee; Chan-Young Kwon; Ye Ji Kim; Jae Hyun Kim; Kwan-Il Kim; Beom-Joon Lee; Jun-Hwan Lee
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundWhen patients continue to experience cough despite conventional treatment, East Asian traditional medicine (EATM) including herbal medicine and/or acupuncture has been frequently used. Previous systematic reviews of EATM treatment for chronic cough have been conducted mainly on herbal medicine, targeting patients with conditions that cause cough. In clinical practice, EATM interventions are not limited to herbal medicine, and considering that chronic cough is often caused by two or more conditions or unspecific causes, a comprehensive investigation is clinically relevant. We examined the current research status of EATM for chronic cough.MethodsBased on Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodological framework, a total of six English, Chinese, Korean, and Japanese electronic databases were searched on August 2022. Any clinical studies on EATM targeting chronic cough patients (regardless of their cause) were included.ResultsAmong 474 included studies, the study designs were mainly randomized controlled trials (72.4%), and the population was evenly distributed between children and adults. The cause of cough was not reported in most studies (56.1%). The common cause of cough was upper airway cough syndrome and post-respiratory infection (9.5%, each), followed by mixed cause (7.6%), nonspecific cause (5.9%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (4.0%). EATM was conducted for a mean of 19.1 days, and herbal medicine was the most common (80.6%). Conventional medication was frequently used as a control (81.2%). For outcomes, the total effective rate was the most frequently utilized (94.3%), followed by cough severity (53.8%). EATM treatment showed positive outcomes in most studies.ConclusionsIn future EATM studies, it is necessary to either specify the cause of chronic cough or to report that the study was targeting nonspecific chronic cough. In addition, high-quality studies assessing the efficacy of EATM with placebo control treatment should be conducted, using validated evaluation tools.

  10. H

    Database of influencers' tweets in cryptocurrency (2021-2022).

    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    • search.dataone.org
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 10, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    mohammad ali zare chahooki; Fereshte Rahmanian (2023). Database of influencers' tweets in cryptocurrency (2021-2022). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GVX9WE
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Mar 10, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    mohammad ali zare chahooki; Fereshte Rahmanian
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Authors, through Twitter API, collected this database over eight months. These data are tweets of over 50 experts regarding market analysis of 40 cryptocurrencies. These experts are known as influencers on social networks such as Twitter. The theory of Behavioral economics shows that the opinions of people, especially experts, can impact the stock market trend (here, cryptocurrencies). Existing databases often cover tweets related to one or more cryptocurrencies. Also, in these databases, no attention is paid to the user's expertise, and most of the data is extracted using hashtags. Failure to pay attention to the user's expertise causes the irrelevant volume to increase and the neutral polarity to increase considerably. This database has a main table named "Tweets1" with 11 columns and 40 tables to separate comments related to each cryptocurrency. The columns of the main table and the cryptocurrency tables are explained in the attached document. Researchers can use this dataset in various machine learning tasks, such as sentiment analysis and deep transfer learning with sentiment analysis. Also, this data can be used to check the impact of influencers' opinions on the cryptocurrency market trend. The use of this database is allowed by mentioning the source.

  11. f

    Application of the NASSS framework.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Mar 17, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Hwayeon Danielle Shin; Emily Hamovitch; Evgenia Gatov; Madison MacKinnon; Luma Samawi; Rhonda Boateng; Kevin E. Thorpe; Melanie Barwick (2025). Application of the NASSS framework. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000418.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 17, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS Digital Health
    Authors
    Hwayeon Danielle Shin; Emily Hamovitch; Evgenia Gatov; Madison MacKinnon; Luma Samawi; Rhonda Boateng; Kevin E. Thorpe; Melanie Barwick
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, Sustainability (NASSS) framework (2017) was established as an evidence-based, theory-informed tool to predict and evaluate the success of implementing health and care technologies. While the NASSS is gaining popularity, its use has not been systematically described. Literature reviews on the applications of popular implementation frameworks, such as the RE-AIM and the CFIR, have enabled their advancement in implementation science. Similarly, we sought to advance the science of implementation and application of theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) in research by exploring the application of the NASSS in the five years since its inception. We aim to understand the characteristics of studies that used the NASSS, how it was used, and the lessons learned from its application. We conducted a scoping review following the JBI methodology. On December 20, 2022, we searched the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and LISTA. We used typologies and frameworks to characterize evidence to address our aim. This review included 57 studies that were qualitative (n=28), mixed/multi-methods (n=13), case studies (n=6), observational (n=3), experimental (n=3), and other designs (e.g., quality improvement) (n=4). The four most common types of digital applications being implemented were telemedicine/virtual care (n=24), personal health devices (n=10), digital interventions such as internet Cognitive Behavioural Therapies (n=10), and knowledge generation applications (n=9). Studies used the NASSS to inform study design (n=9), data collection (n=35), analysis (n=41), data presentation (n=33), and interpretation (n=39). Most studies applied the NASSS retrospectively to implementation (n=33). The remainder applied the NASSS prospectively (n=15) or concurrently (n=8) with implementation. We also collated reported barriers and enablers to implementation. We found the most reported barriers fell within the Organization and Adopter System domains, and the most frequently reported enablers fell within the Value Proposition domain. Eighteen studies highlighted the NASSS as a valuable and practical resource, particularly for unravelling complexities, comprehending implementation context, understanding contextual relevance in implementing health technology, and recognizing its adaptable nature to cater to researchers’ requirements. Most studies used the NASSS retrospectively, which may be attributed to the framework’s novelty. However, this finding highlights the need for prospective and concurrent application of the NASSS within the implementation process. In addition, almost all included studies reported multiple domains as barriers and enablers to implementation, indicating that implementation is a highly complex process that requires careful preparation to ensure implementation success. Finally, we identified a need for better reporting when using the NASSS in implementation research to contribute to the collective knowledge in the field.

  12. Compilation of open asset-level data, as of Dec 2022

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    bin, csv
    Updated Jul 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Rafael Camargo; Rafael Camargo; Andrés Salazar; Alexis Morgan; Andrés Salazar; Alexis Morgan (2024). Compilation of open asset-level data, as of Dec 2022 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7804659
    Explore at:
    bin, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 12, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Rafael Camargo; Rafael Camargo; Andrés Salazar; Alexis Morgan; Andrés Salazar; Alexis Morgan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset is a compilation of open asset-level data, which means the location of sites (e.g., operation, manufacturing, processing facilities of global supply chains), as of December 2022. This included data from 9 publicly available sources, that after data cleaning and harmonization, resulted in 189,075 data points.

    Data sourceNumber of data points
    Open Supply Hub (former Open Apparel Registry)96,736
    Global Power Plant Database35,419
    Climate trace19,945
    FDA database12,898
    Global Dam Watch11,017
    EudraGMDP database5,181
    Sustainable Finance Initiative GeoAsset Databases4,716
    Global Tailings Portal1,956
    Fine print Mining Database1,207

    This data was assigned with the industry in which the asset is. The summary table below shows the number of assets by industry.

    IndustryNumber of assets
    Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Good Production 96,736
    Health Care, Pharma and Biotechnology18,079
    Energy - Solar, Wind16,282
    Energy - Hydropower14,515
    Energy - Geothermal or Combustion11,724
    Metals & Mining11,210
    Transportation Services4,872
    Construction Materials3,117
    Agriculture (animal products)2,388
    Agriculture (plant products)1,896
    Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels1,194
    Water utilities / Water Service Providers892
    Hospitality Services294
    Fishing and aquaculture14
    Other5,862

    Note that this compilation is based on an extensive search, however, we acknowledge that there is a significant discrepancy in data coverage/comprehensiveness among the different industries. The industry "Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Good Production" is by far the most complete, while other are clearly far from complete, for example, “Construction Materials”, "Agriculture (animal products)”, “Agriculture (plant products)”, “Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels”, “Water utilities / Water Service Providers”, “Hospitality Services”, “Fishing and aquaculture”. Therefore, any comparison between industries should take this coverage/comprehensiveness bias into consideration.

  13. Results of network meta-analysis.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kaiyu Zhang; Yi Zhang; Shengwei Hong; Yutian Cao; Chengjiang Liu (2023). Results of network meta-analysis. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280821.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 21, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Kaiyu Zhang; Yi Zhang; Shengwei Hong; Yutian Cao; Chengjiang Liu
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundCombination therapy of α-receptor blockers (α-RBs) and traditional Chinese medicine external therapy can serve as a treatment of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). α-RBs includes tamsulosin, terazosin and so on and the traditional Chinese medicine external therapy includes needling, moxibustion, acupoint catgut embedding, acupoint application, auricular point sticking and hot medicated compress and so forth. Currently, there is no study in which Bayesian network meta-analysis is applied to making a comparative analysis of efficacy of different combination therapies of α-RBs and traditional Chinese medicine external therapy in the treatment of CP/CPPS. Therefore, based on Bayesian algorithm, a network meta-analysis was conducted by us to make a comparison between different combination therapies of α-RBs and traditional Chinese medicine external therapy.MethodsA document retrieval was conducted in the databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data Dissertations of China database, VIP China Science and Technology Journal Database, SinoMed. Literatures were searched for published in biomedical journals concerning clinical study on α-RBs combined with various traditional Chinese medicine external therapies in the treatment of CP/CPPS from inception of database to July 2022. Newest version risks of bias assessment tool (RoB2) was used to assess the risks of bias of studies included in this analysis. Stata 16.0 software and R4.1.3 software were used to make a Bayesian network meta-analysis and charts.Results19 literatures were included involving 1739 patients concerning 12 interventions which were used in the treatment of CP/CPPS. With respect to the total effective rate, α-RBs+ needling was most likely to be the optimal treatment. Concerning National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) total score, α-RBs+ moxibustion+ auricular point sticking was most likely to be optimal treatment, the therapy ranking second was α-RBs+ needling, and the therapy ranking third was α-RBs+ moxibustion. Pain score, voiding score and quality-of-life score are subdomains of the NIH-CPSI total score. With regard to pain score, α-RBs+ moxibustion was most likely to be optimal treatment. In reference to voiding and quality-of-life score, there was no statistically significant difference between the efficacy of various interventions.Conclusionsα-RBs+ needling, α-RBs+ moxibustion and α-RBs+ moxibustion+ auricular point sticking provided relatively good efficacy in the treatment of CP/CPPS. In these treatments, attention should be paid on α-RBs+ needling and α-RBs+ moxibustion which ranked higher many times in the evaluation of various outcome indicators. However, there still were certain limitations in this study, so large-sample clinical randomized control trials with a rigor design following the evidence-based medicine standards need to be conducted to justify the results of this study.Systematic review registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier: [CRD42022341824].

  14. f

    Studies summary.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jul 14, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Aia Boldovskaia; Nuno Manuel Gonçalves Dias; Marlene N. Silva; Eliana V. Carraça (2023). Studies summary. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288541.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Aia Boldovskaia; Nuno Manuel Gonçalves Dias; Marlene N. Silva; Eliana V. Carraça
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Physical literacy is a multidimensional construct that has been defined and interpreted in various ways, one of the most common being “the motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge and understanding to maintain physical activity throughout the life course”. Although its improvement can positively affect many behavioral, psychological, social, and physical variables, debate remains over an appropriate method of collecting empirical physical literacy data. This systematic review sought to identify and critically evaluate all primary studies (published and unpublished, regardless of design or language) that assessed physical literacy in adults or have proposed measurement criteria. Relevant studies were identified by searching four databases (Pubmed, SportDiscus, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science), scanning reference lists of included articles, and manual cross-referencing of bibliographies cited in prior reviews. The final search was concluded on July 15, 2022. Thirty-one studies, published from 2016 to 2022, were analyzed. We found seven instruments measuring physical literacy in adults, of which six were questionnaires. The Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument was the first developed for adults and the most adopted. The included studies approached physical literacy definition in two ways: by pre-defining domains and assessing them discretely (through pre-validated or self-constructed instruments) and by defining domains as sub-scales after factorial analyses. We found a fair use of objective and subjective measures to assess different domains. The wide use of instruments developed for other purposes in combined assessments suggests the need for further instrument development and the potential oversimplification of the holistic concept, which may not result in a better understanding of physical literacy. Quality and usability characteristics of measurements were generally insufficiently reported. This lack of data makes it impossible to compare and make robust conclusions. We could not identify if any of the existing physical literacy assessments for adults is appropriate for large-scale/epidemiological studies.

  15. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2024). Most popular database management systems worldwide 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/809750/worldwide-popularity-ranking-database-management-systems/
Organization logo

Most popular database management systems worldwide 2024

Explore at:
44 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Jun 19, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
Jun 2024
Area covered
Worldwide
Description

As of June 2024, the most popular database management system (DBMS) worldwide was Oracle, with a ranking score of 1244.08; MySQL and Microsoft SQL server rounded out the top three. Although the database management industry contains some of the largest companies in the tech industry, such as Microsoft, Oracle and IBM, a number of free and open-source DBMSs such as PostgreSQL and MariaDB remain competitive. Database Management Systems As the name implies, DBMSs provide a platform through which developers can organize, update, and control large databases. Given the business world’s growing focus on big data and data analytics, knowledge of SQL programming languages has become an important asset for software developers around the world, and database management skills are seen as highly desirable. In addition to providing developers with the tools needed to operate databases, DBMS are also integral to the way that consumers access information through applications, which further illustrates the importance of the software.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu