15 datasets found
  1. d

    NIRF - Master Data: Ranking-and-Academic-year- and University/Institute-wise...

    • dataful.in
    Updated May 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NIRF - Master Data: Ranking-and-Academic-year- and University/Institute-wise Total Number of Admitted, Graduated, Placed and Median Salary of Post and Under Graduate Students [Dataset]. https://dataful.in/datasets/19315
    Explore at:
    application/x-parquet, csv, xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 15, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataful (Factly)
    License

    https://dataful.in/terms-and-conditionshttps://dataful.in/terms-and-conditions

    Area covered
    States of India
    Variables measured
    Number of Students Admitted, Graduated, Placed and Salary Amount
    Description

    The dataset contains ranking-and-academic-year-, state-, and university/institute-wise compiled data on the total number of admitted, graduated and placed students of post and graduate students, along with additional details such as number of first year students intaken, number of admitted students through lateral entry, number of students selected for higher studies and median salary of students selected for placements, etc., as per the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) data

  2. Data from: Journal Ranking Dataset

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Aug 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Abir (2023). Journal Ranking Dataset [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/xabirhasan/journal-ranking-dataset
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Aug 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Kaggle
    Authors
    Abir
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Journals & Ranking

    An academic journal or research journal is a periodical publication in which research articles relating to a particular academic discipline is published, according to Wikipedia. Currently, there are more than 25,000 peer-reviewed journals that are indexed in citation index databases such as Scopus and Web of Science. These indexes are ranked on the basis of various metrics such as CiteScore, H-index, etc. The metrics are calculated from yearly citation data of the journal. A lot of efforts are given to make a metric that reflects the journal's quality.

    Journal Ranking Dataset

    This is a comprehensive dataset on the academic journals coving their metadata information as well as citation, metrics, and ranking information. Detailed data on their subject area is also given in this dataset. The dataset is collected from the following indexing databases: - Scimago Journal Ranking - Scopus - Web of Science Master Journal List

    The data is collected by scraping and then it was cleaned, details of which can be found in HERE.

    Key Features

    • Rank: Overall rank of journal (derived from sorted SJR index).
    • Title: Name or title of journal.
    • OA: Open Access or not.
    • Country: Country of origin.
    • SJR-index: A citation index calculated by Scimago.
    • CiteScore: A citation index calculated by Scopus.
    • H-index: Hirsh index, the largest number h such that at least h articles in that journal were cited at least h times each.
    • Best Quartile: Top Q-index or quartile a journal has in any subject area.
    • Best Categories: Subject areas with top quartile.
    • Best Subject Area: Highest ranking subject area.
    • Best Subject Rank: Rank of the highest ranking subject area.
    • Total Docs.: Total number of documents of the journal.
    • Total Docs. 3y: Total number of documents in the past 3 years.
    • Total Refs.: Total number of references of the journal.
    • Total Cites 3y: Total number of citations in the past 3 years.
    • Citable Docs. 3y: Total number of citable documents in the past 3 years.
    • Cites/Doc. 2y: Total number of citations divided by the total number of documents in the past 2 years.
    • Refs./Doc.: Total number of references divided by the total number of documents.
    • Publisher: Name of the publisher company of the journal.
    • Core Collection: Web of Science core collection name.
    • Coverage: Starting year of coverage.
    • Active: Active or inactive.
    • In-Press: Articles in press or not.
    • ISO Language Code: Three-letter ISO 639 code for language.
    • ASJC Codes: All Science Journal Classification codes for the journal.

    Rest of the features provide further details on the journal's subject area or category: - Life Sciences: Top level subject area. - Social Sciences: Top level subject area. - Physical Sciences: Top level subject area. - Health Sciences: Top level subject area. - 1000 General: ASJC main category. - 1100 Agricultural and Biological Sciences: ASJC main category. - 1200 Arts and Humanities: ASJC main category. - 1300 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: ASJC main category. - 1400 Business, Management and Accounting: ASJC main category. - 1500 Chemical Engineering: ASJC main category. - 1600 Chemistry: ASJC main category. - 1700 Computer Science: ASJC main category. - 1800 Decision Sciences: ASJC main category. - 1900 Earth and Planetary Sciences: ASJC main category. - 2000 Economics, Econometrics and Finance: ASJC main category. - 2100 Energy: ASJC main category. - 2200 Engineering: ASJC main category. - 2300 Environmental Science: ASJC main category. - 2400 Immunology and Microbiology: ASJC main category. - 2500 Materials Science: ASJC main category. - 2600 Mathematics: ASJC main category. - 2700 Medicine: ASJC main category. - 2800 Neuroscience: ASJC main category. - 2900 Nursing: ASJC main category. - 3000 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: ASJC main category. - 3100 Physics and Astronomy: ASJC main category. - 3200 Psychology: ASJC main category. - 3300 Social Sciences: ASJC main category. - 3400 Veterinary: ASJC main category. - 3500 Dentistry: ASJC main category. - 3600 Health Professions: ASJC main category.

  3. Computer Science Rankings 2025

    • timeshighereducation.com
    • itswisss.com
    • +1more
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Times Higher Education (THE), Computer Science Rankings 2025 [Dataset]. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2025/subject-ranking/computer-science
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    Times Higher Educationhttp://www.timeshighereducation.com/
    Authors
    Times Higher Education (THE)
    Description

    Data on the top universities for Computer Science in 2025.

  4. Most popular database management systems worldwide 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 30, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Most popular database management systems worldwide 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/809750/worldwide-popularity-ranking-database-management-systems/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jun 2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of June 2024, the most popular database management system (DBMS) worldwide was Oracle, with a ranking score of *******; MySQL and Microsoft SQL server rounded out the top three. Although the database management industry contains some of the largest companies in the tech industry, such as Microsoft, Oracle and IBM, a number of free and open-source DBMSs such as PostgreSQL and MariaDB remain competitive. Database Management Systems As the name implies, DBMSs provide a platform through which developers can organize, update, and control large databases. Given the business world’s growing focus on big data and data analytics, knowledge of SQL programming languages has become an important asset for software developers around the world, and database management skills are seen as highly desirable. In addition to providing developers with the tools needed to operate databases, DBMS are also integral to the way that consumers access information through applications, which further illustrates the importance of the software.

  5. U.S. universities with most Master's degrees conferred to Hispanics 2015

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. universities with most Master's degrees conferred to Hispanics 2015 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/639281/ranking-of-universities-in-the-united-states-by-the-number-of-hispanic-graduates/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2015
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This statistic provides a ranking of universities in the United States in 2015, by their number of Hispanic Master's degree graduates. In 2015, Florida International University conferred ***** Master's degrees to Hispanic students.

  6. ATP Tour Ranking - Decade-wise and year-wise

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Jun 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kalilur Rahman (2025). ATP Tour Ranking - Decade-wise and year-wise [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/kalilurrahman/atp-tennis-player-ranking-dataset
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Jun 3, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Kaggle
    Authors
    Kalilur Rahman
    Description

    The ATP Tour (known as the ATP World Tour from January 2009 until December 2018) is a worldwide top-tier tennis tour for men organized by the Association of Tennis Professionals. The second-tier tour is the ATP Challenger Tour and the third-tier is ITF Men's World Tennis Tour. The equivalent women's organisation is the WTA Tour.

    The ATP Tour comprises ATP Masters 1000, ATP 500, and ATP 250.[1] The ATP also oversees the ATP Challenger Tour,[2] a level below the ATP Tour, and the ATP Champions Tour for seniors. Grand Slam tournaments, a small portion of the Olympic tennis tournament, the Davis Cup, and the entry-level ITF World Tennis Tour do not fall under the purview of the ATP, but are overseen by the ITF instead and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) for the Olympics. In these events, however, ATP ranking points are awarded, with the exception of the Olympics. The four-week ITF Satellite tournaments were discontinued in 2007. Players and doubles teams with the most ranking points (collected during the calendar year) play in the season-ending ATP Finals, which, from 2000–2008, was run jointly with the International Tennis Federation (ITF). The details of the professional tennis tour are:

    Event Number Total prize money (USD) Winner's ranking points Governing body Grand Slam 4 See individual articles 2,000 ITF ATP Finals 1 4,450,000 1,100–1,500 ATP (2009–present) ATP Masters 1000 9 2,450,000 to 3,645,000 1000 ATP ATP 500 13 755,000 to 2,100,000 500 ATP ATP 250 39 416,000 to 1,024,000 250 ATP Olympics 1 See individual articles 0 IOC ATP Challenger Tour 178 40,000 to 220,000 80 to 125 ATP ITF Men's Circuit 534 10,000 and 25,000 18 to 35 ITF

    The dataset is from Jeff Sackmann(https://github.com/JeffSackmann/tennis_atp)

  7. f

    Cross-Correlation of Spectral Count Ranking to Validate Quantitative...

    • acs.figshare.com
    zip
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Olli Kannaste; Tomi Suomi; Jussi Salmi; Esa Uusipaikka; Olli Nevalainen; Garry L. Corthals (2023). Cross-Correlation of Spectral Count Ranking to Validate Quantitative Proteome Measurements [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1021/pr401096z.s001
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    ACS Publications
    Authors
    Olli Kannaste; Tomi Suomi; Jussi Salmi; Esa Uusipaikka; Olli Nevalainen; Garry L. Corthals
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The measurement of change in biological systems through protein quantification is a central theme in modern biosciences and medicine. Label-free MS-based methods have greatly increased the ease and throughput in performing this task. Spectral counting is one such method that uses detected MS2 peptide fragmentation ions as a measure of the protein amount. The method is straightforward to use and has gained widespread interest. Additionally reports on new statistical methods for analyzing spectral count data appear at regular intervals, but a systematic evaluation of these is rarely seen. In this work, we studied how similar the results are from different spectral count data analysis methods, given the same biological input data. For this, we chose the algorithms Beta Binomial, PLGEM, QSpec, and PepC to analyze three biological data sets of varying complexity. For analyzing the capability of the methods to detect differences in protein abundance, we also performed controlled experiments by spiking a mixture of 48 human proteins in varying concentrations into a yeast protein digest to mimic biological fold changes. In general, the agreement of the analysis methods was not particularly good on the proteome-wide scale, as considerable differences were found between the different algorithms. However, we observed good agreements between the methods for the top abundance changed proteins, indicating that for a smaller fraction of the proteome changes are measurable, and the methods may be used as valuable tools in the discovery-validation pipeline when applying a cross-validation approach as described here. Performance ranking of the algorithms using samples of known composition showed PLGEM to be superior, followed by Beta Binomial, PepC, and QSpec. Similarly, the normalized versions of the same method, when available, generally outperformed the standard ones. Statistical detection of protein abundance differences was strongly influenced by the number of spectra acquired for the protein and, correspondingly, its molecular mass.

  8. States ranking for having a baby in the United States in 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 10, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    States ranking for having a baby in the United States in 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1456038/ranking-of-states-to-have-a-baby-in-the-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 10, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2024
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    As of 2024, Massachusetts was ranked as the best state to have a baby in the United States, followed by North Dakota and Minnesota. On the other hand, Mississippi was ranked as the worst state to have a baby. The U.S. state rankings for best states to have a baby were created using ** metrics, which included key metrics like fertility clinics per capita, obstetrician-gynecologists availability, prenatal care access, and birth rates. The ** metrics were grouped under four categories — costs, healthcare, baby friendliness, and family friendliness.

  9. An Empirical Investigation of Open Access Scholarly Publishing Trends in...

    • figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Jul 18, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dr. Mohammad Nazim (2024). An Empirical Investigation of Open Access Scholarly Publishing Trends in Social Sciences at High-Ranked Central Universities of India. Research data.xlsx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26325133.v1
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 18, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Dr. Mohammad Nazim
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    India
    Description

    This study aims to analyze the adoption of Open Access (OA) publishing in social sciences within central universities in India, focusing on various aspects such as the growth of OA literature, the utilization of different OA routes, and collaboration patterns in OA publications.Ten central universities were selected based on their rankings in the National Institute Ranking Framework (NIRF) 2022. Data on OA publishing in social sciences were collected from the Social Science Citation Index of the Web of Science database using the advanced search query "(CU=India OR AD=India) AND PY=(2003-2022) NOT PY=(2023)". Data analysis was conducted using MS Excel (v16.0), BibExcel (version - 2017), Biblioshiny (version 4.1.2), and Google Open Refine (version 3.7).

  10. 'Wet Cat Food (Ms For F)' usage in FR 2021 - 2023, by type

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 13, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). 'Wet Cat Food (Ms For F)' usage in FR 2021 - 2023, by type [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/439855/cat-food-in-tins-foil-trays-and-pouches-usage-by-type-in-france/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 13, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    France
    Description

    Considering the three different types presented in this statistics, 'Pouches' leads the ranking with 6 million people. Contrastingly, 'Foil trays' is ranked last, with 2.4 million people.

  11. Most ATP Masters 1000 titles won by male professional tennis players as of...

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 27, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Most ATP Masters 1000 titles won by male professional tennis players as of 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1121631/atp-event-titles-player/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 27, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of November 2023, Novak Djokovic topped the rankings of male professional tennis players with the most ATP Masters 1000 titles. In a career that began in 2003, the Serbian won a staggering 40 ATP Masters 1000 titles, the latest of which came during the 2023 Rolex Paris Masters against Bulgarian Grigor Dimitrov. In second place was Spaniard Rafael Nadal with 36 titles.

  12. Number of international students in the U.S. 2023/24, by country of origin

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Number of international students in the U.S. 2023/24, by country of origin [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/233880/international-students-in-the-us-by-country-of-origin/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 3, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In the academic year 2023/24, there were 331,602 international students from India studying in the United States. International students The majority of international students studying in the United States are originally from India and China, totaling 331,602 students and 277,398 students respectively in the 2023/24 school year. In 2022/23, there were 467,027 international graduate students , which accounted for over one third of the international students in the country. Typically, engineering and math & computer science programs were among the most common fields of study for these students. The United States is home to many world-renowned schools, most notably, the Ivy League Colleges which provide education that is sought after by both foreign and local students. International students and college Foreign students in the United States pay some of the highest fees in the United States, with an average of 24,914 U.S. dollars. American students attending a college in New England paid an average of 14,900 U.S. dollars for tuition alone and there were about 79,751 international students in Massachusetts . Among high-income families, U.S. students paid an average of 34,700 U.S. dollars for college, whereas the average for all U.S. families reached only 28,026 U.S. dollars. Typically, 40 percent of families paid for college tuition through parent income and savings, while 29 percent relied on grants and scholarships.

  13. 'Wet Dog Food (Ms For F)' usage in FR 2020 - 2022, by type

    • statista.com
    Updated Jan 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). 'Wet Dog Food (Ms For F)' usage in FR 2020 - 2022, by type [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/439568/dog-food-in-tins-foil-trays-and-pouches-usage-by-type-in-france/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 27, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    France
    Description

    Considering the three different types presented in this statistics, 'Tins' leads the French ranking with 1.6 million people. Contrastingly, 'Pouches' is ranked last, with 738.41 thousand people. Their difference, compared to the Types, lies at 850.73 thousand people.

  14. U.S. infant mortality rate by state 2022

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Aug 26, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). U.S. infant mortality rate by state 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/252064/us-infant-mortality-rate-by-ethnicity-2011/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 26, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2022, the state of Mississippi had the highest infant mortality rate in the United States, with around 9.11 deaths per 1,000 live births. Infant mortality is the death of an infant before the age of one. The countries with the lowest infant mortality rates worldwide are Slovenia, Singapore, and Iceland. The countries with the highest infant mortality rates include Afghanistan, Somalia, and the Central African Republic. Causes of infant mortality Rates and causes of infant mortality are different depending on the country and region. However, the leading causes of neonatal deaths include preterm birth complications, intrapartum-related events, and sepsis. The leading causes of death among children aged 1 to 59 months are pneumonia, diarrhea, and injury. In the United States The infant mortality rate in the United States has decreased over the past few decades, reaching a low of 5.4 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2021. The most common causes of infant death in the United States are congenital malformations, low birth weight, and sudden infant death syndrome. In 2022, congenital malformations accounted for around 108 infant deaths per 100,000 live births.

  15. Cost of living index in the U.S. 2024, by state

    • statista.com
    Updated May 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Cost of living index in the U.S. 2024, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1240947/cost-of-living-index-usa-by-state/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 27, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2024
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    West Virginia and Kansas had the lowest cost of living across all U.S. states, with composite costs being half of those found in Hawaii. This was according to a composite index that compares prices for various goods and services on a state-by-state basis. In West Virginia, the cost of living index amounted to **** — well below the national benchmark of 100. Virginia— which had an index value of ***** — was only slightly above that benchmark. Expensive places to live included Hawaii, Massachusetts, and California. Housing costs in the U.S. Housing is usually the highest expense in a household’s budget. In 2023, the average house sold for approximately ******* U.S. dollars, but house prices in the Northeast and West regions were significantly higher. Conversely, the South had some of the least expensive housing. In West Virginia, Mississippi, and Louisiana, the median price of the typical single-family home was less than ******* U.S. dollars. That makes living expenses in these states significantly lower than in states such as Hawaii and California, where housing is much pricier. What other expenses affect the cost of living? Utility costs such as electricity, natural gas, water, and internet also influence the cost of living. In Alaska, Hawaii, and Connecticut, the average monthly utility cost exceeded *** U.S. dollars. That was because of the significantly higher prices for electricity and natural gas in these states.

  16. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
NIRF - Master Data: Ranking-and-Academic-year- and University/Institute-wise Total Number of Admitted, Graduated, Placed and Median Salary of Post and Under Graduate Students [Dataset]. https://dataful.in/datasets/19315

NIRF - Master Data: Ranking-and-Academic-year- and University/Institute-wise Total Number of Admitted, Graduated, Placed and Median Salary of Post and Under Graduate Students

Explore at:
application/x-parquet, csv, xlsxAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
May 15, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Dataful (Factly)
License

https://dataful.in/terms-and-conditionshttps://dataful.in/terms-and-conditions

Area covered
States of India
Variables measured
Number of Students Admitted, Graduated, Placed and Salary Amount
Description

The dataset contains ranking-and-academic-year-, state-, and university/institute-wise compiled data on the total number of admitted, graduated and placed students of post and graduate students, along with additional details such as number of first year students intaken, number of admitted students through lateral entry, number of students selected for higher studies and median salary of students selected for placements, etc., as per the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) data

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu