NASC is an exercise designed to fill the existing data gap in the agricultural landscape in Nigeria. It is a comprehensive enumeration of all agricultural activities in the country, including crop production, fisheries, forestry, and livestock activities. The implementation of NASC was done in two phases, the first being the Listing Phase, and the second is the Sample Survey Phase. Under the first phase, enumerators visited all the selected Enumeration Areas (EAs) across the Local Government Areas (LGAs) and listed all the farming households in the selected enumeration areas and collected the required information. The scope of information collected under this phase includes demographic details of the holders, type of agricultural activity (crop production, fishery, poultry, or livestock), the type of produce or product (for example: rice, maize, sorghum, chicken, or cow), and the details of the contact persons. The listing exercise was conducted concurrently with the administration of a Community Questionnaire, to gather information about the general views of the communities on the agricultural and non-agricultural activities through focus group discussions.
The main objective of the listing exercise is to collect information on agricultural activities at household level in order to provide a comprehensive frame for agricultural surveys. The main objective of the community questionnaire is to obtain information about the perceptions of the community members on the agricultural and non-agricultural activities in the community.
Additional objectives of the overall NASC program include the following: · To provide data to help the government at different levels in formulating policies on agriculture aimed at attaining food security and poverty alleviation · To provide data for the proposed Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rebasing
Estimation domains are administrative areas from which reliable estimates are expected. The sample size planned for the extended listing operation allowed reporting key structural agricultural statistics at Local Government Area (LGA) level.
Agricultural Households.
Population units of this operation are households with members practicing agricultural activities on their own account (farming households). However, all households in selected EAs were observed as much as possible to ensure a complete coverage of farming households.
Census/enumeration data [cen]
An advanced methodology was adopted in the conduct of the listing exercise. For the first time in Nigeria, the entire listing was conducted digitally. NBS secured newly demarcated digitized enumeration area (EA) maps from the National Population Commission (NPC) and utilized them for the listing exercise. This newly carved out maps served as a basis for the segmentation of the areas visited for listing exercise. With these maps, the process for identifying the boundaries of the enumeration areas by the enumerators was seamless.
The census was carried out in all the 36 States of the Federation and FCT. Forty (40) enumeration Areas (EAs) were selected to be canvassed in each LGA, the number of EAs covered varied by state, which is a function of the number of LGAs in the state. Both urban and rural EAs were canvassed. Out of 774 LGAs in the country, 767 LGAs were covered and the remaining 7 LGAs (4 in Imo and 3 in Borno States) were not covered due to insecurity (99% coverage). In all, thirty thousand, nine hundred and sixty (30,960) EAs were expected to be covered nationwide but 30,546 EAs were canvassed.
The Sampling method adopted involved three levels of stratification. The objective of this was to provide representative data on every Local Government Area (LGA) in Nigeria. Thus, the LGA became the primary reporting domain for the NASC and the first level of stratification. Within each LGA, eighty (80) EAs were systematically selected and stratified into urban and rural EAs, which then formed the second level of stratification, with the 80 EAs proportionally allocated to urban and rural according to the total share of urban/rural EAs within the LGA. These 80 EAs formed the master sample from which the main NASC sample was selected. From the 80 EAs selected across all the LGAs, 40 EAs were systematically selected per LGA to be canvassed. This additional level selection of EAs was again stratified across urban and rural areas with a target allocation of 30 rural and 10 urban EAs in each LGA. The remaining 40 EAs in each LGA from the master sample were set aside for replacement purposes in case there would be need for any inaccessible EA to be replaced.
Details of sampling procedure implemented in the NASC (LISTING COMPONENT). A stratified two-phase cluster sampling method was used. The sampling frame was stratified by urban/rural criteria in each LGA (estimation domain/analytical stratum).
First phase: in each LGA, a total sample of 80 EAs were allocated in each strata (urban/rural) proportionally to their number of EAs with reallocations as need be. In each stratum, the sample was selected with a Pareto probability proportional to size considering the number of households as measure of size.
Second phase: systematic subsampling of 40 EAs was done (10 in Urban and 30 in Rural with reallocations as needed, if there were fewer than 10 Urban or 30 Rural EAs in an LGA). This phase was implicitly stratified through sorting the first phase sample by geography.
With a total of 773 LGAs covered in the frame, the total planned sample size was 30920 EAs. However, during fieldwork 2 LGAs were unable to be covered due to insecurity and additional 4 LGAs were suspended early due to insecurity. For the same reason, replacements of some sampled EAs were needed in many LGAs. The teams were advised to select replacement units where possible considering appurtenance to the same stratum and similarity including in terms of population size. However about 609 EAs replacement units were selected from a different stratum and were discarded from data processing and reporting.
Out of 774 LGAs in the country, 767 LGAs were covered and the remaining 7 LGAs (4 in Imo and 3 in Borno states) were not covered due to insecurity (99% coverage).
Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]
The NASC household listing questionnaire served as a meticulously designed instrument administered within every household to gather comprehensive data. It encompassed various aspects such as household demographics, agricultural activities including crops, livestock (including poultry), fisheries, and ownership of agricultural/non-agricultural enterprises.
The questionnaire was structured into the following sections:
Section 0: ADMINISTRATIVE IDENTIFICATION Section 1: BUILDING LISTING Section 2: HOUSEHOLD LISTING (Administered to the Head of Household or any knowledgeable adult member aged 15 years and above).
Data processing of the NASC household listing survey included checking for inconsistencies, incompleteness, and outliers. Data editing and cleaning was carried out electronically using the Stata software package. In some cases where data inconsistencies were found a call back to the household was carried out. A pre-analysis tabulation plan was developed and the final tables for publication were created using the Stata software package.
Given the complexity of the sample design, sampling errors were estimated through re-sampling approaches (Bootstrap/Jackknife)
As of July 2024, Nigeria's population was estimated at around 229.5 million. Between 1965 and 2024, the number of people living in Nigeria increased at an average rate of over two percent. In 2024, the population grew by 2.42 percent compared to the previous year. Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa. By extension, the African continent records the highest growth rate in the world. Africa's most populous country Nigeria was the most populous country in Africa as of 2023. As of 2022, Lagos held the distinction of being Nigeria's biggest urban center, a status it also retained as the largest city across all of sub-Saharan Africa. The city boasted an excess of 17.5 million residents. Notably, Lagos assumed the pivotal roles of the nation's primary financial hub, cultural epicenter, and educational nucleus. Furthermore, Lagos was one of the largest urban agglomerations in the world. Nigeria's youthful population In Nigeria, a significant 50 percent of the populace is under the age of 19. The most prominent age bracket is constituted by those up to four years old: comprising 8.3 percent of men and eight percent of women as of 2021. Nigeria boasts one of the world's most youthful populations. On a broader scale, both within Africa and internationally, Niger maintains the lowest median age record. Nigeria secures the 20th position in global rankings. Furthermore, the life expectancy in Nigeria is an average of 62 years old. However, this is different between men and women. The main causes of death have been neonatal disorders, malaria, and diarrheal diseases.
The 2008 Sudan Population and Housing Census is the 5th Sudan Population and Housing Census conducted, and one of the most important censuses in the history of Sudan. It is based on the comprehensive peace agreement. It provides hope for Sudanese people to build a new Sudan, with a fair share in power, resources, services and development. To achieve these goals a population census with a high accuracy and a full coverage is a necessity.
Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS)-International is an effort to inventory, preserve, harmonize, and disseminate census microdata from around the world. The project has collected the world's largest archive of publicly available census samples. The data are coded and documented consistently across countries and over time to facillitate comparative research. IPUMS-International makes these data available to qualified researchers free of charge through a web dissemination system.
The IPUMS project is a collaboration of the Minnesota Population Center, National Statistical Offices, and international data archives. Major funding is provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation and the Demographic and Behavioral Sciences Branch of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Additional support is provided by the University of Minnesota Office of the Vice President for Research, the Minnesota Population Center, and Sun Microsystems.
National
The de facto method is applied for the enumeration of the population.
Census/enumeration data [cen]
The sample size (person records) is equal to 5'066'530.
Long form questionnaire for sedentary households (selected enumeration areas) and a sample of nomad households.
Face-to-face [f2f]
As mentioned above the census data is to be collected in two forms. A short form to be used for 90% of EAs with a minimum number of questions ( 11 questions ) and to satisfy the basic population data needed for the election and other basic demographic needs. A long form to be administered in10% of the enumeration areas (EAS) and will provide all other standard social and economic information. The details of these questionnaires are following closely the UN principles and recommendations for censuses as decided by the TWG. That had put sometimes the TWG in conflicts with the governing councils and politicians at the national and regional levels. For e.g. the MOC had requested the deletion of the questions on ethnicity after its endorsement by the PCC in its second meeting. The PCC decided to raise it to the Presidency as the TWG had reconfirmed its technical importance. Based on the understanding that ethnicity and religion are causes of conflicts in Sudan, the Presidency decided to delete these questions. It was suggested as a compromise to use the question on previous residence to give information about Southern people living in the North. The South Sudan Population Census Council (SSPCC) requested an amplification of the question to reflect household origin from the nine 1956 Provinces (Northern, Khartoum, Central, Eastern, Kordofan, Darfur, Upper Nile, Bahr Elghazal and Equatoria) in stead of (north/south). But that was not accepted by many members of the PCC and some politicians in the north who believe that it is another way of bringing back the ethnicity question. The SSPCC then insisted on the re-inclusion of the ethnicity and religion questions. That led to a lot of delays in printing the questionnaires. In order to get out of this dilemma the TWG with support of UNFPA had decided to stick firmly to the UN standards. That is to stick to the previous residence question (origin) which is core one and to neglect the ethnicity question which is an optional one.
For census data entry the Technical Working Group (TWG) decided with endorsement of the PCC that the data entry was to be decentralized. Nine centers were suggested. These are the capitals of old British provinces. The TWG also decided that the short and long forms to be scanned using optical mark recognition (OMR) technology. That decision was based on the field visits to some African countries which used the same technology in their censuses. For quality assurance a high level team from both CBS and SSCCSE were sent to DRS Company in UK to ensure that the forms were correctly printed in both Arabic and English so as to avoid occurrence of any errors or faults during enumeration and the scanning process. It was decided that the census data was to be processed, the results produced and the tabulation prepared centrally. The national and regional tabulation to be analyzed and published using different data dissemination methods such as:-printed reports, electronic media (websites, Emails), data archiving, seminars and workshops. The use of internet as another tool for data dissemination was also suggested.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau.For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the Infrastructure Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.Naming conventions:Prefixes: None Countp Percentr Ratem Mediana Mean (average)t Aggregate (total)ch Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)pch Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)chp Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)s Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed Suffixes: _e19 Estimate from 2014-19 ACS_m19 Margin of Error from 2014-19 ACS_00_v19 Decennial 2000, re-estimated to 2019 geography_00_19 Change, 2000-19_e10_v19 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2019 geography_m10_v19 Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2019 geography_e10_19 Change, 2010-19The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent. The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2015-2019). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available. For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional CommissionDate: 2015-2019Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)Link to the manifest: https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/3d489c725bb24f52a987b302147c46ee/data
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau across all standard and custom geographies at statewide summary level where applicable.
For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the ACS 2016-2020 Data Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
s
Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed
Suffixes:
_e20
Estimate from 2016-20 ACS
_m20
Margin of Error from 2016-20 ACS
_e10
2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography
_m10
Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography
_e10_20
Change, 2010-20 (holding constant at 2020 geography)
Geographies
AAA = Area Agency on Aging (12 geographic units formed from counties providing statewide coverage)
ARWDB7 = Atlanta Regional Workforce Development Board (7 counties merged to a single geographic unit)
Census Tracts (statewide)
CFGA23 = Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta (23 counties merged to a single geographic unit)
City (statewide)
City of Atlanta Council Districts (City of Atlanta)
City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit (City of Atlanta)
City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit STV (subarea of City of Atlanta)
City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas (City of Atlanta)
County (statewide)
Georgia House (statewide)
Georgia Senate (statewide)
MetroWater15 = Atlanta Metropolitan Water District (15 counties merged to a single geographic unit)
Regional Commissions (statewide)
State of Georgia (statewide)
Superdistrict (ARC region)
US Congress (statewide)
UWGA13 = United Way of Greater Atlanta (13 counties merged to a single geographic unit)
WFF = Westside Future Fund (subarea of City of Atlanta)
ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (statewide)
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2016-2020). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission Date: 2016-2020 Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)
Link to the manifest: https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/documents/GARC::acs-2020-data-manifest/about
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau across all standard and custom geographies at statewide summary level where applicable.
For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the ACS 2016-2020 Data Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
s
Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed
Suffixes:
_e20
Estimate from 2016-20 ACS
_m20
Margin of Error from 2016-20 ACS
_e10
2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography
_m10
Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography
_e10_20
Change, 2010-20 (holding constant at 2020 geography)
Geographies
AAA = Area Agency on Aging (12 geographic units formed from counties providing statewide coverage)
ARWDB7 = Atlanta Regional Workforce Development Board (7 counties merged to a single geographic unit)
Census Tracts (statewide)
CFGA23 = Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta (23 counties merged to a single geographic unit)
City (statewide)
City of Atlanta Council Districts (City of Atlanta)
City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit (City of Atlanta)
City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit STV (subarea of City of Atlanta)
City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas (City of Atlanta)
County (statewide)
Georgia House (statewide)
Georgia Senate (statewide)
MetroWater15 = Atlanta Metropolitan Water District (15 counties merged to a single geographic unit)
Regional Commissions (statewide)
State of Georgia (statewide)
Superdistrict (ARC region)
US Congress (statewide)
UWGA13 = United Way of Greater Atlanta (13 counties merged to a single geographic unit)
WFF = Westside Future Fund (subarea of City of Atlanta)
ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (statewide)
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2016-2020). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission Date: 2016-2020 Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)
Link to the manifest: https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/documents/GARC::acs-2020-data-manifest/about
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau.For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the Infrastructure Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.Naming conventions:Prefixes: None Countp Percentr Ratem Mediana Mean (average)t Aggregate (total)ch Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)pch Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)chp Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)s Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed Suffixes: _e19 Estimate from 2014-19 ACS_m19 Margin of Error from 2014-19 ACS_00_v19 Decennial 2000, re-estimated to 2019 geography_00_19 Change, 2000-19_e10_v19 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2019 geography_m10_v19 Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2019 geography_e10_19 Change, 2010-19The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent. The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2015-2019). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available. For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional CommissionDate: 2015-2019Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)Link to the manifest: https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/3d489c725bb24f52a987b302147c46ee/data
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show numbers and percentages for occupation, household income, and commuting pattern by race and by US Congress in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
Attributes and definitions available below under "Attributes" section and in Infrastructure Manifest (due to text box constraints, attributes cannot be displayed here).
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show the birth and citizenship status by Neighborhood Statistical Areas E02 and E06 in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
SumLevel
Summary level of geographic unit (e.g., County, Tract, NSA, NPU, DSNI, Super District, etc)
GEOID
Census tract Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) code
NAME
Name of geographic unit
Planning_Region
Planning region designation for ARC purposes
Acres
Total area within the tract (in acres)
SqMi
Total area within the tract (in square miles)
County
County identifier (combination of Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) codes for state and county)
CountyName
County Name
TotPop_e
# Total population, 2017
TotPop_m
# Total population, 2017 (MOE)
Native_e
# U.S. Native, 2017
Native_m
# U.S. Native, 2017 (MOE)
pNative_e
% U.S. Native, 2017
pNative_m
% U.S. Native, 2017 (MOE)
BornUS_e
# Born in the United States, 2017
BornUS_m
# Born in the United States, 2017 (MOE)
pBornUS_e
% Born in the United States, 2017
pBornUS_m
% Born in the United States, 2017 (MOE)
BornState_e
# Born in state of residence, 2017
BornState_m
# Born in state of residence, 2017 (MOE)
pBornState_e
% Born in state of residence, 2017
pBornState_m
% Born in state of residence, 2017 (MOE)
BornDiffState_e
# Born in different state, 2017
BornDiffState_m
# Born in different state, 2017 (MOE)
pBornDiffState_e
% Born in different state, 2017
pBornDiffState_m
% Born in different state, 2017 (MOE)
BornTerr_e
# Born in Puerto Rico, U.S. Island Areas, or born abroad to American parent(s), 2017
BornTerr_m
# Born in Puerto Rico, U.S. Island Areas, or born abroad to American parent(s), 2017 (MOE)
pBornTerr_e
% Born in Puerto Rico, U.S. Island Areas, or born abroad to American parent(s), 2017
pBornTerr_m
% Born in Puerto Rico, U.S. Island Areas, or born abroad to American parent(s), 2017 (MOE)
ForBorn_e
# Foreign born, 2017
ForBorn_m
# Foreign born, 2017 (MOE)
pForBorn_e
% Foreign born, 2017
pForBorn_m
% Foreign born, 2017 (MOE)
Naturalized_e
# Naturalized U.S. citizen, 2017
Naturalized_m
# Naturalized U.S. citizen, 2017 (MOE)
pNaturalized_e
% Naturalized U.S. citizen, 2017
pNaturalized_m
% Naturalized U.S. citizen, 2017 (MOE)
NotNaturalized_e
# Not a U.S. citizen, 2017
NotNaturalized_m
# Not a U.S. citizen, 2017 (MOE)
pNotNaturalized_e
% Not a U.S. citizen, 2017
pNotNaturalized_m
% Not a U.S. citizen, 2017 (MOE)
last_edited_date
Last date the feature was edited by ARC
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show housing tenure by race and by Regional Commission in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
Attributes and definitions available below under "Attributes" section and in Infrastructure Manifest (due to text box constraints, attributes cannot be displayed here).
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show the number and percentages of migration by Neighborhood Planning Units S, T, and V in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
SumLevel
Summary level of geographic unit (e.g., County, Tract, NSA, NPU, DSNI, SuperDistrict, etc)
GEOID
Census tract Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) code
NAME
Name of geographic unit
Planning_Region
Planning region designation for ARC purposes
Acres
Total area within the tract (in acres)
SqMi
Total area within the tract (in square miles)
County
County identifier (combination of Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) codes for state and county)
CountyName
County Name
Pop1P_e
# Population ages 1 year and over, 2017
Pop1P_m
# Population ages 1 year and over, 2017 (MOE)
SameHouse_e
# Living in the same house as 1 year ago, 2017
SameHouse_m
# Living in the same house as 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pSameHouse_e
% Living in the same house as 1 year ago, 2017
pSameHouse_m
% Living in the same house as 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
DiffHouseInUS_e
# Living in a different house in the U.S. 1 year ago, 2017
DiffHouseInUS_m
# Living in a different house in the U.S. 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pDiffHouseInUS_e
% Living in a different house in the U.S. 1 year ago, 2017
pDiffHouseInUS_m
% Living in a different house in the U.S. 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
SameCounty_e
# Living in a different house in the same county 1 year ago, 2017
SameCounty_m
# Living in a different house in the same county 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pSameCounty_e
% Living in a different house in the same county 1 year ago, 2017
pSameCounty_m
% Living in a different house in the same county 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
DiffCounty_e
# Living in a different county 1 year ago, 2017
DiffCounty_m
# Living in a different county 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pDiffCounty_e
% Living in a different county 1 year ago, 2017
pDiffCounty_m
% Living in a different county 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
SameState_e
# Living in a different county, same state 1 year ago, 2017
SameState_m
# Living in a different county, same state 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pSameState_e
% Living in a different county, same state 1 year ago, 2017
pSameState_m
% Living in a different county, same state 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
Diff_State_e
# Living in a different state 1 year ago, 2017
Diff_State_m
# Living in a different state 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pDiff_State_e
% Living in a different state 1 year ago, 2017
pDiff_State_m
% Living in a different state 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
Abroad_e
# Living abroad 1 year ago, 2017
Abroad_m
# Living abroad 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pAbroad_e
% Living abroad 1 year ago, 2017
pAbroad_m
% Living abroad 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
Moved_e
# Moved in the last year, 2017
Moved_m
# Moved in the last year, 2017 (MOE)
pMoved_e
% Moved in the last year, 2017
pMoved_m
% Moved in the last year, 2017 (MOE)
last_edited_date
Last date the feature was edited by ARC
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show population composition of the renter-occupied housing units by Regional Commission in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
Attributes and definitions available below under "Attributes" section and in Infrastructure Manifest (due to text box constraints, attributes cannot be displayed here).
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show household size, type, and composition data by Regional Commission in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
Attributes and definitions available below under "Attributes" section and in Infrastructure Manifest (due to text box constraints, attributes cannot be displayed here).
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show age, type, vacancy rates, and owner/renter tenure of housing units by US Congress in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
Attributes and definitions available below under "Attributes" section and in Infrastructure Manifest (due to text box constraints, attributes cannot be displayed here).
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau across all standard and custom geographies at statewide summary level where applicable.
For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the ACS 2016-2020 Data Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
s
Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed
Suffixes:
_e20
Estimate from 2016-20 ACS
_m20
Margin of Error from 2016-20 ACS
_e10
2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography
_m10
Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography
_e10_20
Change, 2010-20 (holding constant at 2020 geography)
Geographies
AAA = Area Agency on Aging (12 geographic units formed from counties providing statewide coverage)
ARWDB7 = Atlanta Regional Workforce Development Board (7 counties merged to a single geographic unit)
Census Tracts (statewide)
CFGA23 = Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta (23 counties merged to a single geographic unit)
City (statewide)
City of Atlanta Council Districts (City of Atlanta)
City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit (City of Atlanta)
City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit STV (subarea of City of Atlanta)
City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas (City of Atlanta)
County (statewide)
Georgia House (statewide)
Georgia Senate (statewide)
MetroWater15 = Atlanta Metropolitan Water District (15 counties merged to a single geographic unit)
Regional Commissions (statewide)
State of Georgia (statewide)
Superdistrict (ARC region)
US Congress (statewide)
UWGA13 = United Way of Greater Atlanta (13 counties merged to a single geographic unit)
WFF = Westside Future Fund (subarea of City of Atlanta)
ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (statewide)
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2016-2020). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission Date: 2016-2020 Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)
Link to the manifest: https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/documents/GARC::acs-2020-data-manifest/about
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show household income numbers and ranges by Regional Commission in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
Attributes and definitions available below under "Attributes" section and in Infrastructure Manifest (due to text box constraints, attributes cannot be displayed here). Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show numbers and percentages for voting age population by US Congress in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
SumLevel
Summary level of geographic unit (e.g., County, Tract, NSA, NPU, DSNI, SuperDistrict, etc)
GEOID
Census tract Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) code
NAME
Name of geographic unit
Planning_Region
Planning region designation for ARC purposes
Acres
Total area within the tract (in acres)
SqMi
Total area within the tract (in square miles)
County
County identifier (combination of Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) codes for state and county)
CountyName
County Name
VotingAgeCitizen_e
# Citizen, 18 and over population, 2017
VotingAgeCitizen_m
# Citizen, 18 and over population, 2017 (MOE)
VotingAgeCitizenMale_e
# Male citizen, 18 and over population, 2017
VotingAgeCitizenMale_m
# Male citizen, 18 and over population, 2017 (MOE)
pVotingAgeCitizenMale_e
% Male citizen, 18 and over population, 2017
pVotingAgeCitizenMale_m
% Male citizen, 18 and over population, 2017 (MOE)
VotingAgeCitizenFemale_e
# Female citizen, 18 and over population, 2017
VotingAgeCitizenFemale_m
# Female citizen, 18 and over population, 2017 (MOE)
pVotingAgeCitizenFemale_e
% Female citizen, 18 and over population, 2017
pVotingAgeCitizenFemale_m
% Female citizen, 18 and over population, 2017 (MOE)
last_edited_date
Last date the feature was edited by ARC
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show school enrollment, education attainments, and household composition by race and by US Congressional Districts in Georgia.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
Attributes and definitions available below under "Attributes" section and in Infrastructure Manifest (due to text box constraints, attributes cannot be displayed here).
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau across all standard and custom geographies at statewide summary level where applicable. For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the ACS 2017-2021 Data Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics. Find naming convention prefixes/suffixes, geography definitions and user notes below.Prefixes:NoneCountpPercentrRatemMedianaMean (average)tAggregate (total)chChange in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)pchPercent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)chpChange in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)sSignificance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computedSuffixes:_e21Estimate from 2017-21 ACS_m21Margin of Error from 2017-21 ACS_e102006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography_m10Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography_e10_21Change, 2010-21 (holding constant at 2020 geography)GeographiesAAA = Area Agency on Aging (12 geographic units formed from counties providing statewide coverage)ARC21 = Atlanta Regional Commission modeling area (21 counties merged to a single geographic unit)ARWDB7 = Atlanta Regional Workforce Development Board (7 counties merged to a single geographic unit)BeltLine (buffer)BeltLine Study (subareas)Census Tract (statewide)CFGA23 = Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta (23 counties merged to a single geographic unit)City (statewide)City of Atlanta Council Districts (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit STV (3 NPUs merged to a single geographic unit within City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas E02E06 (2 NSAs merged to single geographic unit within City of Atlanta)County (statewide)Georgia House (statewide)Georgia Senate (statewide)MetroWater15 = Atlanta Metropolitan Water District (15 counties merged to a single geographic unit)Regional Commissions (statewide)SPARCC = Strong, Prosperous And Resilient Communities ChallengeState of Georgia (single geographic unit)Superdistrict (ARC region)US Congress (statewide)UWGA13 = United Way of Greater Atlanta (13 counties merged to a single geographic unit)WFF = Westside Future Fund (subarea of City of Atlanta)ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (statewide)The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent. The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2017-2021). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available. For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional CommissionDate: 2017-2021Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)Link to the data manifest: https://garc.maps.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/34b9adfdcc294788ba9c70bf433bd4c1/data
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Division of the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2014-2018). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the Infrastructure Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
s
Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% Confidence Interval, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed
Suffixes:
_e18
Estimate from 2014-18 ACS
_m18
Margin of Error from 2014-18 ACS
_00_v18
Decennial 2000 in 2018 geography boundary
_00_18
Change, 2000-18
_e10_v18
Estimate from 2006-10 ACS in 2018 geography boundary
_m10_v18
Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS in 2018 geography boundary
_e10_18
Change, 2010-18
NASC is an exercise designed to fill the existing data gap in the agricultural landscape in Nigeria. It is a comprehensive enumeration of all agricultural activities in the country, including crop production, fisheries, forestry, and livestock activities. The implementation of NASC was done in two phases, the first being the Listing Phase, and the second is the Sample Survey Phase. Under the first phase, enumerators visited all the selected Enumeration Areas (EAs) across the Local Government Areas (LGAs) and listed all the farming households in the selected enumeration areas and collected the required information. The scope of information collected under this phase includes demographic details of the holders, type of agricultural activity (crop production, fishery, poultry, or livestock), the type of produce or product (for example: rice, maize, sorghum, chicken, or cow), and the details of the contact persons. The listing exercise was conducted concurrently with the administration of a Community Questionnaire, to gather information about the general views of the communities on the agricultural and non-agricultural activities through focus group discussions.
The main objective of the listing exercise is to collect information on agricultural activities at household level in order to provide a comprehensive frame for agricultural surveys. The main objective of the community questionnaire is to obtain information about the perceptions of the community members on the agricultural and non-agricultural activities in the community.
Additional objectives of the overall NASC program include the following: · To provide data to help the government at different levels in formulating policies on agriculture aimed at attaining food security and poverty alleviation · To provide data for the proposed Gross Domestic Product (GDP) rebasing
Estimation domains are administrative areas from which reliable estimates are expected. The sample size planned for the extended listing operation allowed reporting key structural agricultural statistics at Local Government Area (LGA) level.
Agricultural Households.
Population units of this operation are households with members practicing agricultural activities on their own account (farming households). However, all households in selected EAs were observed as much as possible to ensure a complete coverage of farming households.
Census/enumeration data [cen]
An advanced methodology was adopted in the conduct of the listing exercise. For the first time in Nigeria, the entire listing was conducted digitally. NBS secured newly demarcated digitized enumeration area (EA) maps from the National Population Commission (NPC) and utilized them for the listing exercise. This newly carved out maps served as a basis for the segmentation of the areas visited for listing exercise. With these maps, the process for identifying the boundaries of the enumeration areas by the enumerators was seamless.
The census was carried out in all the 36 States of the Federation and FCT. Forty (40) enumeration Areas (EAs) were selected to be canvassed in each LGA, the number of EAs covered varied by state, which is a function of the number of LGAs in the state. Both urban and rural EAs were canvassed. Out of 774 LGAs in the country, 767 LGAs were covered and the remaining 7 LGAs (4 in Imo and 3 in Borno States) were not covered due to insecurity (99% coverage). In all, thirty thousand, nine hundred and sixty (30,960) EAs were expected to be covered nationwide but 30,546 EAs were canvassed.
The Sampling method adopted involved three levels of stratification. The objective of this was to provide representative data on every Local Government Area (LGA) in Nigeria. Thus, the LGA became the primary reporting domain for the NASC and the first level of stratification. Within each LGA, eighty (80) EAs were systematically selected and stratified into urban and rural EAs, which then formed the second level of stratification, with the 80 EAs proportionally allocated to urban and rural according to the total share of urban/rural EAs within the LGA. These 80 EAs formed the master sample from which the main NASC sample was selected. From the 80 EAs selected across all the LGAs, 40 EAs were systematically selected per LGA to be canvassed. This additional level selection of EAs was again stratified across urban and rural areas with a target allocation of 30 rural and 10 urban EAs in each LGA. The remaining 40 EAs in each LGA from the master sample were set aside for replacement purposes in case there would be need for any inaccessible EA to be replaced.
Details of sampling procedure implemented in the NASC (LISTING COMPONENT). A stratified two-phase cluster sampling method was used. The sampling frame was stratified by urban/rural criteria in each LGA (estimation domain/analytical stratum).
First phase: in each LGA, a total sample of 80 EAs were allocated in each strata (urban/rural) proportionally to their number of EAs with reallocations as need be. In each stratum, the sample was selected with a Pareto probability proportional to size considering the number of households as measure of size.
Second phase: systematic subsampling of 40 EAs was done (10 in Urban and 30 in Rural with reallocations as needed, if there were fewer than 10 Urban or 30 Rural EAs in an LGA). This phase was implicitly stratified through sorting the first phase sample by geography.
With a total of 773 LGAs covered in the frame, the total planned sample size was 30920 EAs. However, during fieldwork 2 LGAs were unable to be covered due to insecurity and additional 4 LGAs were suspended early due to insecurity. For the same reason, replacements of some sampled EAs were needed in many LGAs. The teams were advised to select replacement units where possible considering appurtenance to the same stratum and similarity including in terms of population size. However about 609 EAs replacement units were selected from a different stratum and were discarded from data processing and reporting.
Out of 774 LGAs in the country, 767 LGAs were covered and the remaining 7 LGAs (4 in Imo and 3 in Borno states) were not covered due to insecurity (99% coverage).
Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]
The NASC household listing questionnaire served as a meticulously designed instrument administered within every household to gather comprehensive data. It encompassed various aspects such as household demographics, agricultural activities including crops, livestock (including poultry), fisheries, and ownership of agricultural/non-agricultural enterprises.
The questionnaire was structured into the following sections:
Section 0: ADMINISTRATIVE IDENTIFICATION Section 1: BUILDING LISTING Section 2: HOUSEHOLD LISTING (Administered to the Head of Household or any knowledgeable adult member aged 15 years and above).
Data processing of the NASC household listing survey included checking for inconsistencies, incompleteness, and outliers. Data editing and cleaning was carried out electronically using the Stata software package. In some cases where data inconsistencies were found a call back to the household was carried out. A pre-analysis tabulation plan was developed and the final tables for publication were created using the Stata software package.
Given the complexity of the sample design, sampling errors were estimated through re-sampling approaches (Bootstrap/Jackknife)