The majority of the existing natural gas wells in the United States as of 2018 operated within a wide range of production rates, varying from ** to ***** barrels of oil equivalent per day. Natural gas wells with a very low or very high daily production had almost no participation in this industry.

Canadian Marketable Natural Gas Production, The Energy Market Assessment, Short-term Canadian Natural Gas Deliverability 2016-2018, provides an estimate of the amount of marketable natural gas by gas grouping and by province from the beginning of 2016 to the end of 2018. The outlook presents three distinct cases, a Higher Price Case, Mid-Range Price Case, and a Lower Price Case, each of which are based on a set of assumptions, which are described in detail at: http://www.neb-one.gc.ca/nrg/sttstc/ntrlgs/rprt/2016-2018ntrlgsdlvrblty/index-eng.html. The dataset also provides monthly historical production by Western Canada gas grouping from the beginning of 1998 to the end of 2015. Annual drilling days and number of wells drilled by gas grouping and well depth are included, as are initial production rates and decline parameters by well vintage by grouping for the period 2000-2018.

The total amount of horizontal oil and gas wells in the United States has considerably increased between 2008 and 2018, from some 28,400 to approximately 140,000 horizontal wells. The majority of these wells have a production rate ranging between 15 and 100 barrels of oil equivalent per day.

Oil and natural gas wells are a prominent source of the greenhouse gas methane (CH4), but most measurements are from newer, high producing wells. There are nearly 700,000 marginal “stripper” wells in the US, which produce less than 15 barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) d−1. We made direct measurements of CH4 and volatile organic carbon (VOC) emissions from marginal oil and gas wells in the Appalachian Basin of southeastern Ohio, all producing < 1 BOE d−1. Methane and VOC emissions followed a skewed distribution, with many wells having zero or low emissions and a few wells responsible for the majority of emissions. The average CH4 emission rate from marginal wells was 128 g h−1 (median: 18 g h−1; range: 0– 907 g h−1). Follow-up measurements at five wells indicated high emissions were not episodic. Some wells were emitting all or more of the reported gas produced at each well, or venting gas from wells with no reported gas production. Measurements were made from wellheads only, not tanks, so our estimates may be conservative. Stochastic processes such as maintenance may be the main driver of emissions. Marginal wells are a disproportionate source of CH4 and VOCs relative to oil and gas production. We estimate that oil and gas wells in this lowest production category emit approximately 11% of total annual CH4 from oil and gas production in the EPA greenhouse gas inventory, although they produce about 0.2% of oil and 0.4% of gas in the US per year. Implications: Low producing marginal wells are the most abundant type of oil and gas well in the United States, and a surprising number of them are venting all or more of their reported produced gas to the atmosphere. This makes marginal wells a disproportionate greenhouse gas emissions source compared to their energy return, and a good target for environmental mitigation.

The following data set contains all the Oil & Gas Wells in Pennsylvania that the Dept of Environmental Protection has locational information on. The wells are broken into two formation types of conventional and unconventional wells. A conventional well is a bore hole drilled or being drilled for the purpose of or to be used for the production of oil or natural gas from only conventional formation(s). A conventional formation is any formation that does not meet the statutory definition of an unconventional formation. An unconventional gas well is a bore hole drilled or being drilled for the purpose of or to be used for the production of natural gas from an unconventional formation. Unconventional formation is a geological shale formation existing below the base of the Elk Sandstone or its geologic equivalent stratigraphic interval where natural gas generally cannot be produced at economic flow rates or in economic volumes except by vertical or horizontal well bores stimulated by hydraulic fracture treatments or by using multilateral well bores or other techniques to expose more of the formation to the well bore.

The size of the US Natural Gas Market was valued at USD XX Million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD XXX Million by 2032, with an expected CAGR of 5.00">> 5.00% during the forecast period. Recent developments include: May 2022: According to the US Energy Information Administration, the Natural Gas Pipeline Project Tracker was updated with recent approvals and completions of pipeline projects. As of the end of the first quarter of 2022, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approved three projects to increase the export of US natural gas by pipeline and LNG. FERC approved two projects connecting LNG terminals in Louisiana. The Evangeline Pass Expansion Project, owned by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, is 1.1 billion cubic feet in size. It is intended that the proposed Plaquemines LNG Project in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, be supplied with natural gas by constructing 13.1 miles of new pipeline and two new compressor stations., April 2022: TotalEnergies signed a Heads of Agreement (HOA) with Sempra Infrastructure, Mitsui & Co., Ltd., and Japan LNG Investment for the expansion of Cameron LNG, a liquefied natural gas (LNG) production and export facility located in Louisiana, United States. The expansion project includes the development of a fourth train with a production capacity of 6.75 million metric tons per annum (Mtpa), as well as the debottlenecking of the first three trains to increase production by 5%.. Key drivers for this market are: Increasing Global Demand for Refined Petroleum Products4., Economic Growth and Industrialization. Potential restraints include: Environmental Concerns and Regulations. Notable trends are: Power Generation Segment to Dominate the Market.

Snapshot img

Shale Gas Market Size 2025-2029

The shale gas market size is forecast to increase by USD 22.1 billion, at a CAGR of 5.5% between 2024 and 2029.

The market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing adoption of green fracking methods. This eco-friendly approach to extracting shale gas reduces the environmental impact compared to traditional methods, making it an attractive alternative for energy companies. However, the market faces a substantial challenge in the form of water scarcity for fracking operations. The extraction process requires large volumes of water, and the availability of this resource is becoming increasingly limited in certain regions. Fossil fuels, including oil and natural gas, remain the primary fuel sources, but the energy transition towards renewable energy sources is gaining momentum.
This dynamic market requires strategic planning and innovation from companies to capitalize on the opportunities presented by green fracking while mitigating the challenges associated with water scarcity. Companies must address this issue by implementing water recycling and conservation techniques or exploring alternative water sources to ensure the sustainability of their operations and maintain competitiveness in the market. Gas-fired power plants and enhanced gas recovery techniques offer solutions for energy independence and reduced greenhouse gas emissions.

What will be the Size of the Shale Gas Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free Sample

The market continues to evolve, driven by advancements in technologies and the ongoing pursuit of energy security. Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, has revolutionized the extraction of natural gas from shale formations, leading to a rise in production. However, the intricacies of shale reservoirs require a multidisciplinary approach, encompassing natural gas storage, pipeline infrastructure, well completion, and gas transportation. For instance, accurate stress field characterization and gas flow modeling are crucial for optimizing well completion and ensuring economic viability. Geomechanical modeling and rock mechanics help assess the integrity of wells and prevent formation damage mechanisms. Proppant selection, well testing procedures, and horizontal drilling are essential for maximizing production.

Moreover, environmental impact assessment and produced water treatment are vital components of the shale gas value chain. Induced seismicity, a concern for some, is being addressed through advancements in frac fluid chemistry, microseismic monitoring, and well integrity management. The shale gas industry anticipates robust growth, with expectations of a 5% compound annual growth rate over the next decade. This expansion will necessitate the development of gas processing technologies, such as pressure transient analysis and water management, to ensure flow assurance and reduce methane emissions. Additionally, the increasing importance of liquefied natural gas in the global energy landscape will further shape the market dynamics.

How is this Shale Gas Industry segmented?

The shale gas industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Technology

  Horizontal fracking
  Vertical fracking
  Rotary fracking


Application

  Industrial
  Buildings
  Transportation


Type

  Direct channel
  Indirect channel


Geography

  North America

    US
    Canada


  Europe

    Germany
    Russia
    UK


  APAC

    China
    India
    Japan
    South Korea


  South America

    Brazil


  Rest of World (ROW)

By Technology Insights

The Horizontal fracking segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. Shale gas production in the US has seen significant advancements in recent years, driven by the adoption of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques. Horizontal fracking increases the contact area between the wellbore and the shale rock, enabling more efficient gas extraction and higher production rates. This results in greater gas recovery compared to vertical drilling, making shale gas production economically viable despite higher initial costs. The success of shale gas production is underpinned by various technological advancements. Stress field characterization and geomechanical modeling help optimize well completion and drilling processes. Gas flow modeling and reservoir simulation enable better understanding of reservoir behavior and production forecasting. The transition towards renewable energy and green hydrogen production is gaining momentum, with hydrogen derived from natural gas, k

Oil and gas field service providers are directly tied to oil and gas production, so the industry typically follows trends that are significant to that industry (IBISWorld Report 21111). The period started off on a low note as the pandemic massively weakened production, cutting down the need for field service providers as the number of rigs operating saw a steep drop. This drop carried on in 2021 but resurged in 2022, driven by favorable pricing because of supply chain issues from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which briefly bolstered field services providers. This revenue growth carried on into 2023 and 2024 as production continued to push up. Even so, prices took a dip, so growth was not as significant. Overall revenue pushed up at a CAGR of 2.5%, reaching $109.8 billion through 2025, including a 5.1% push down in 2025 as crude oil pricess are set to fall. Amid these fluctuations, the adoption of advanced enhanced oil recovery techniques initially benefited oil and gas field services providers as companies enlisted support for new technologies. Yet, increased efficiency led to a reduced need for rigs, fundamentally constraining growth for oil and gas field service providers. Despite this, profit has swelled amid lower operational costs. Nonetheless, with this uptick in efficiency, field service providers have cut down their workforce as employment has pushed down at a CAGR of 1.9% from 2020 to 2025. Looking ahead, oil and gas field services providers are poised to enjoy modest growth. The stabilization of natural gas and crude oil prices will continue, allowing for more investment in the industry and providing a much-needed boost to field service providers. Even so, the continued push for investment in renewable energy poses a competitive threat. Despite these challenges, US oil and gas producers will sustain robust production levels, particularly for exports, which will positively influence field service providers. The need for natural gas will also support growth in this sector. Overall, revenue for oil and gas field services providers is set to climb at a CAGR of 0.5%, reaching $112.7 billion in 2030.

There are three types of petroleum wells potentially capable of supplying geothermal energy for electric power generation: (a) a producing oil or gas well with a water cut, (b) an oil or gas well abandoned because of a high water cut, and (c) a geopressured brine well with dissolved gas. This paper considers the basic technical and economic aspects of power generations from each of the three types of wells and presents case histories of estimating the available power capacity of a typical well (or a group of wells) in each of the above categories. We have conducted these assessments for commercial developers and operators.The power capacity of wells in the first category is determined primarily by the production rate and temperature of the produced water, ambient temperature, and conversion efficiency of the geothermal power plant. The factors that control the wellhead temperature of the produced fluid are: formation temperature, well depth, well diameter and production rate. Our assessment of some producing oil wells in the Middle East showed that in spite of an attractive formation temperature, the wellhead temperature of the produced water was too low compared to the ambient temperature to allow commercial generation of geothermal power. However, solar energy or the gas being flared in such a field could be used to boost the temperature of the produced water and increase the power capacity.The power capacity of an abandoned gas well depends on: (a) production rate and temperature of the produced water, (b) ambient temperature, (c) conversion efficiency of the geothermal power plant, (d) water salinity, (e) gas content in the produced fluid, (f) heating value of the gas, and (g) the characteristics of the equipment used to generate power from the produced gas. The production rates of water and gas from such a well depend on the hydraulic properties of the formation, gas content (dissolved as well as free) in the formation water, formation temperature and pressure, and well design. It is shown that the well’s productivity could be substantially improved by working it over; both pumping and self-flowing the well are considered. A conceptual design of a hybrid system to produce power from both the produced gas and water is proposed. A case history of assessment of such a gas well from the U.S. Gulf Coast is presented in the paper; it is concluded that power generation from the well is technically feasible, and can be commercially acceptable. The possible approaches to improving the project economics are discussed.The power capacity of a geopressured well is determined by all of the factors considered above for an abandoned oil or gas well plus the amount of overpressure in the formation. A geopressured production well that supplied the U.S. Department of Energy’s demonstration power project in Pleasant Bayou, Texas, in the late 1980’s was re-assessed. The well is estimated to be capable of generating 3.9 MW of which 1.5 MW is from geothermal energy, 1.9 MW from the produced methane and 0.5 MW from kinetic energy of the produced fluid. Injection of the power plant waste fluid is an important issue in developing a geopressured project. For the example above, the net power available after deducting the parasitic power for injection is 3.1 MW. The economics of such a project is dependent on the market price of natural gas; if the gas price is high enough it would be more profitable to sell the produced gas rather than generating power from it.

Global oil and gas production companies have gone through significant turbulence for most of the period. Revenue started off in a downturn amid the pandemic and its accompanying lockdowns, primarily the industry's largest market, the transportation sector, was limited. This was quickly reversed as the economy opened and supply outpaced demand, causing prices to skyrocket. High prices, accompanied by swelling production, led to surging revenue. This was further amplified by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which forced many countries to put sanctions on Russia. With countries scrambling to find new suppliers, prices continued to shoot up in 2022. Nonetheless, prices eventually cooled back down later in the period, but still remained well above pre-pandemic levels. Overall revenue has pushed up at a CAGR of 11.7% to $4.0 trillion through the end of 2025, including a slight 7.3% dip in 2025 alone. Profit also surged as purchase costs came down. Emerging markets in BRIC nations, Southeast Asia and Africa continue to drive growth because of rapid industrialization and population increases, heightening the need for crude oil, natural gas and related downstream products. Even so, the gradual shift toward renewable energy poses challenges for producers, as many countries have implemented regulations and incentives to promote clean energy use. Geopolitical tensions and the uncertainties stemming from the global pandemic underscore the importance of diversifying supply sources to ensure energy security. Overall, industry revenue is set to push down at a CAGR of 2.5% to $3.6 trillion through the end of 2030. The bulk of this period will be highlighted by more efforts in oil and gas exploration and production in emerging markets, potentially transforming these regions into major global producers. Established countries will take this time to upgrade their technology and infrastructure to make production more efficient to keep profitability steady. Even so, the excess supply of oil and gas, combined with the push for sustainability, will drive prices down, leading to revenue contractions.

Natural gas demand in the Netherlands amounted to **** billion cubic meters in 2024. Between 2005 and 2010, natural gas consumption in the Netherlands increased to **** billion cubic meters. This was the highest consumption rate during the displayed period. Domestic production decline Natural gas production has seen an overall decline since 2010, when output stood at a peak of **** billion cubic meters. By 2024, the production of natural gas in the Netherlands was just **** percent of that produced in 2010. The Netherlands is the fifth-largest natural gas producer in Europe, not including Russia. Oil and gas well decommissioning activity to pick up The Netherlands is expected to dismantle more than *** oil and gas wells located in the North Sea between 2024 and 2029. Other countries set to see greater offshore decommissioning activity are the United Kingdom and Norway.

The following data set contains all the Oil & Gas Wells in Pennsylvania that the Dept of Enviromental Protection has locational information on. The wells are broken into two formation types of conventional and unconventional wells. A conventional well is a bore hole drilled or being drilled for the purpose of or to be used for the production of oil or natureal gas from only conventional formation(s). A conventional formation is any formation that does not meet the statutory definition of an unconventional formation. An unconventional gas well is a bore hole drilled or being drilled for the purpose of or to be used for the production of natural gas from an unconventional formation. Unconventional formation is a geological shale formation existing below the base of the Elk Sandstone or its geologic equivalent stratigraphic interval where natural gas generally cannot be produced at economic flow rates or in economic volumes except by vertical or horizontal well bores stimulated by hydraulic fracture treatments or by using multilateral well bores or other techniques to expose more of the formation to the well bore. The following fields are displayed in the data set: PERMIT_NUM is the Permit Number associated with the well, WELL_NAME is the name given to the well by DEP or the Operator, OPERATOR the name of the current operator for the well, OPER_NUM is the Operator Number associated with the current operator, WELL_TYPE describes the type of well, WELL_TYPECD is the code associated with the Well type, WELL_STAT is the current status of the well, WELL_STATCD is the code associated with the current well status, PERM_DATE is the date associated with the permit number, SPUD_DATE is the drilling commencement date, or proposed drilling commencement date as reported by the operator, CONSV_IND indicates whether thie wellbore penetrates the Onondaga horizon as defined in the PA Oil & Gas Conservation Law, COUNTY is the county the well is permitted in, COUNTY_ID is the code associated to the county, MCD is the municipality that the well is in, MCD_TYPE is the type of municipality that the well is in, MCD_CD is the code associated to the municipality name, LATITUDE is the latitude of the well bore hole, LONGITUDE is the longitude of the well bore hole, PRMRY_FID is a system generated id associated with the primary facility record for this well in the DEP eFACTS database, UNCV_IND indicates whether this is a conventional or unconventional well, SURFACE_ELEV is the ground elevation at the well head location, WELL_CONFIG_CD indicates the well configuration, COAL_IND indicates if the well is in a coal or non coal region, PLUG_C_DATE is the well plug completion date, WELL_PAD is the name of the well pad on which the well is located.

The global Oil and Gas Supporting Activities market is poised for significant expansion, projected to reach an estimated USD 150,000 million by 2025, with a robust Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7.5% anticipated through 2033. This growth is primarily propelled by escalating global energy demand, necessitating enhanced exploration and production efforts. Key drivers include advancements in drilling technologies, the increasing complexity of extraction from unconventional reserves, and the vital need for efficient well maintenance to sustain production levels. The Natural Gas Extraction segment, in particular, is expected to witness substantial investment due to the growing global preference for cleaner energy sources and the strategic importance of natural gas in transitioning economies. Furthermore, the rising focus on operational efficiency and safety standards across the oil and gas value chain underpins the demand for specialized supporting activities. The market landscape is characterized by a dynamic interplay of drivers and restraints. While growing energy needs fuel market expansion, fluctuating crude oil prices and increasing regulatory pressures related to environmental impact present considerable challenges. Geopolitical instability in key oil-producing regions can also disrupt supply chains and investment. However, the industry is actively responding to these challenges through innovation, with a pronounced trend towards digitalization and automation in supporting activities to improve efficiency and reduce costs. The Application segment, encompassing Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas Extraction, will see varied growth trajectories based on regional resource potential and investment climates. Halliburton, Saipem, Schlumberger, GE (Baker Hughes), and Weatherford are key players expected to lead innovation and market share in this evolving sector. Here is a unique report description for "Oil and Gas Supporting Activities," incorporating your specified requirements:

This comprehensive report offers an in-depth analysis of the global Oil and Gas Supporting Activities market, providing a detailed examination of its current state and future trajectory. The study encompasses a Historical Period from 2019-2024, a Base Year of 2025, and an Estimated Year also of 2025, with a robust Forecast Period extending from 2025-2033. We present a projected market size of USD 550 million for the base year, with expectations to reach USD 720 million by 2033, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.5%. This report delves into the intricate dynamics of exploration, development, and maintenance services essential for the upstream oil and gas sector.

Shale gas and tight oil production in the United States is forecast to increase to more than 35 trillion cubic feet by 2050, up from 29.4 trillion cubic feet in 2024. Shale gas refers to natural gas that is trapped within dense shale formations. Tight oil is crude oil contained in such rock formations. It is extracted by drilling wells and pumping a sand, water, and chemical mixture into the rock. The pressure under which the mixture is pushed into fissures cracks the rock open, allowing for the gas and oil to be removed. Origins of U.S. shale gas production The extraction of shale gas and tight oil in the U.S. has increased dramatically since 2000; from about 1.77 trillion cubic feet to over 29 trillion cubic feet in 2024. The economic viability of shale exploration is a result of technological advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (fracking), as well as a surge in oil benchmark prices in the late 2000s and early 2010s. China's fast-growing economy meant it required ever greater amounts of petroleum products, while the largest oil producing body, OPEC, tightly controlled production output in order to push prices higher. This led to the WTI crude oil price climbing to an annual average of nearly 100 U.S. dollars in 2008, despite the onset of the financial crisis. Although early shale pioneer Mitchell Energy had experimented with horizontal drilling and fracking, it took until the 2000s for the technology to hit off. Shale gas production is concentrated primarily in regions such as the Northeast and the Gulf Coast, with Appalachia being the most productive U.S. natural gas region. Fossil fuel reserves in the U.S. The United States had 17.4 trillion cubic meters of proved natural gas reserves, as of 2023. The North American country ranked fourth among the leading countries by proved natural gas reserves. Russia led the ranking with over 44 trillion cubic meters. The same year, U.S. oil reserves amounted to over 47 billion barrels, more than double the amount in 2000.

Though often cited as the deepest oil well in the world, O-14 in the Chayvo field off the coast of Sakhalin, Russia is actually only some 3,300 feet deep when measured by its vertical drilling depth. However, it has an impressive length of 49,000 feet achieved mainly through directional or horizontal drilling.

The following data set contains all the Oil & Gas Wells in Pennsylvania that the Dept of Enviromental Protection has locational information on. The wells are broken into two formation types of conventional and unconventional wells. A conventional well is a bore hole drilled or being drilled for the purpose of or to be used for the production of oil or natureal gas from only conventional formation(s). A conventional formation is any formation that does not meet the statutory definition of an unconventional formation. An unconventional gas well is a bore hole drilled or being drilled for the purpose of or to be used for the production of natural gas from an unconventional formation. Unconventional formation is a geological shale formation existing below the base of the Elk Sandstone or its geologic equivalent stratigraphic interval where natural gas generally cannot be produced at economic flow rates or in economic volumes except by vertical or horizontal well bores stimulated by hydraulic fracture treatments or by using multilateral well bores or other techniques to expose more of the formation to the well bore.

This data is hosted at, and may be downloaded or accessed from PASDA, the Pennsylvania Spatial Data Access Geospatial Data Clearinghouse http://www.pasda.psu.edu/uci/DataSummary.aspx?dataset=1088

The decline rate of gas wells varies with production time and is related to reservoir and working system. A typical single well numerical model of low permeability gas wells is established. The variation law of decline rate and its main influencing factors are studied by single factor analysis method. The results show that there are two stages of rapid and slow decline for the decline rate of gas wells, and the decline rate tends to be stable after the gas wells entering the decline period of 2–3 years; the decline rate increases with the increase of permeability, gas saturation and wellhead pressure, and decreases with the increase of porosity and well-controlled reserves; the decline rate in late production does not change with the change of reservoir thickness, initial production allocation and formation pressure. Then the decline rate model is and Then the decline rate model and the non-linear model of each factor are established by using response surface method are used to predict the decline rate quickly and accurately. According to the prediction model, the larger the well-controlled reserves, the smaller the permeability and the smaller the decline rate. In order to reduce production decline rate in gas well production process, it is suggested that the influence of various parameters on production decline rate should be considered comprehensively, and the well-controlled reserves of gas well should be increased as far as possible.

As a result of crude oil price crash followed by the economic crisis sparked by Covid-19, crude oil demand has plummeted due to restricted mobility as lockdown measures were implemented. Operators were swift to readjust their capital and production guidance for the year of 2020. From a list of 17 operators, the total capital expenditure cut sums up to approximately US$ 38 billion, with Exxon leading the cut with US$ 10 billion followed by Chevron with US$ 6 billion. However, Occidental Petroleum has the biggest percentage cut of 55%. The withdrawal of investments in development plan in US Lower 48 states has led to a decline in production in 2020. The oil production cuts intensified during Q2 2020 with Permian Basin experienced the biggest decline in crude oil, summing up to approximate 1 million barrels a day (mmbd). As for the natural gas decline, Permian and Eagle Ford contribute to approximately 3.5 billion cubic feet per day (bcfd) and 1 bcfd as a result of oil well production curtailment. Read More