This dataset is the 20ft Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for all of Buncombe County, NC. The DEMs were developed from Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) data acquired January though February through April 2003, with partial re-flights for gap data in December 2003. Cell values in the DEMs were derived from a Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) produced from the bare earth mass points and breaklines. The dataset was provided to the Buncombe County by the NC Floodplain Mapping Project as pre-release data in July and Sept 2006 .Specific information about individual data tiles can be obtained at www.ncfloodmaps.com

A digital elevation model (DEM) for North Carolina. The grid cell size is 3 feet. Data used to create the DEM was derived from LiDAR collected by the NC Floodplain Mapping Program and processed by NC Department of Public Safety - Division of Emergency Management.Download county-based DEMs from the NC OneMap Direct Data Downloads. Data should not be downloaded using the map on the dataset's item page.

A digital elevation model (DEM) for North Carolina with a grid cell size of 3 feet. This is a version of the NC Digital Elevation Model resource that has been optimized for viewing purposes. This is achieved by applying an equalized stretch to the data so that differences in elevation are easier to see. However, this results in a 3-band image which means that the data values only range from 0-255 rather than the actual elevation values. Therefore, this service should not be used for any type of analysis. If analysis is desired, use the aforementioned NC Digital Elevation Model resource.Data used to create the DEM was derived from LiDAR collected by the NC Floodplain Mapping Program and processed by NC Department of Public Safety - Division of Emergency Management.Download county-based DEMs from the NC OneMap Direct Data Downloads. Data should not be downloaded using the map on the dataset's item page.

An aspect map (slope direction) derived from Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) with a 3ft. grid cell size. Compass direction is rendered using the following colors: red (north), magenta (northwest), blue (west), cyan (southwest), light cyan (south), light green (southeast), light orange (east), orange (northeast). Data used to create the DEMs was derived from LiDAR collected by the NC Floodplain Mapping Program and processed by NC Department of Public Safety - Division of Emergency Management.Download county-based DEMs from the NC OneMap Direct Data Downloads. Data should not be downloaded using the map on the dataset's item page.

This is a lidar DEM at 1m resolution, in EPSG:3358, extracted from the GRASS GIS North Carolina Dataset.

Original CREDITS.txt:

This OSGeo sample dataset for research, development and education was
prepared thanks to agencies providing public access to geospatial
data. We are especially grateful to the North Carolina (NC) Center for
Geographic Information and Analysis, Wake County GIS, NC State Climate
Office, NC Department of Transportation, USGS and NASA for making
their data available. Advice and assistance with the data set by
Julia Harrell, Silvia Terziotti, Robert Austin, Adeola Dokun, Jeff
Essic, and Doug Newcomb, and computer system assistance by Micah Colon
are greatly appreciated. Martin Spott is acknowedged for processing
of geonames.org data for NC.

The processing of MODIS time series (separate MAPSET) was kindly
supported by telascience.org, we are grateful to John Graham for
granting access to these computational resources.

August 2007 Helena Mitasova
Markus Neteler
http://www.grassbook.org

A shaded relief map that provides a clear picture of the topography of the State. The Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) that support this service have a 3ft. grid cell size. They were derived from LiDAR collected by the NC Floodplain Mapping Program and processed by NC Department of Public Safety - Division of Emergency Management. More information about the LiDAR data can be found on the North Carolina LiDAR website.Download county-based DEMs from the NC OneMap Direct Data Downloads section of the website. Data should not be downloaded using the map on the dataset's item page.

This dataset is the 5 foot contour intervals for all of Buncombe County, NC. This data was created using a 20ft Digital Elevation Model (DEM). The DEMs were developed from Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) data acquired January though February through April 2003, with partial re-flights for gap data in December 2003. Cell values in the DEMs were derived from a Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) produced from the bare earth mass points and breaklines. The dataset was provided to the Buncombe County by the NC Floodplain Mapping Project as pre-release data in July and Sept 2006 .Specific information about individual data tiles can be obtained at www.ncfloodmaps.comTo download the 5 foot contours go to https://www.buncombecounty.org/governing/depts/gis/download-digital-data.aspx

A shaded relief map derived from Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) with a 3ft. grid cell size. A vertical exaggeration factor of 3 used for visual effect. Data used to create the DEMs was derived from LiDAR collected by the NC Floodplain Mapping Program and processed by NC Department of Public Safety - Division of Emergency Management.Download county-based DEMs from the NC OneMap Direct Data Downloads. Data should not be downloaded using the map on the dataset's item page.

A layer showing degrees of slope derived from Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) with a 3ft. grid cell size. Steepness is represented in degrees. The range of values is 0 degrees (flat) to 90 degrees (vertical). Data used to create the DEMs was derived from LiDAR collected by the NC Floodplain Mapping Program and processed by NC Department of Public Safety - Division of Emergency Management.Download county-based DEMs from the NC OneMap Direct Data Downloads. Data should not be downloaded using the map on the dataset's item page.

Coweeta Basin reference GIS data that were either commissioned or produced by the USDA Forest Service Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory or the Coweeta LTER starting in the late 1980s.

GRASS GIS Location containing data prepared for a FUTURES urban growth modeling case study for the broader Raleigh-Durham area in North Carolina, USA. Contains NLCD 2001-2019 (land cover for all years; 2001 and 2019 impervious descriptor), county boundaries, USGS DEM, PAD-US protected areas.

This dataset combines the work of several different projects to create a seamless data set for the contiguous United States. Data from four regional Gap Analysis Projects and the LANDFIRE project were combined to make this dataset. In the northwestern United States (Idaho, Oregon, Montana, Washington and Wyoming) data in this map came from the Northwest Gap Analysis Project. In the southwestern United States (Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah) data used in this map came from the Southwest Gap Analysis Project. The data for Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Virginia came from the Southeast Gap Analysis Project and the California data was generated by the updated California Gap land cover project. The Hawaii Gap Analysis project provided the data for Hawaii. In areas of the county (central U.S., Northeast, Alaska) that have not yet been covered by a regional Gap Analysis Project, data from the Landfire project was used. Similarities in the methods used by these projects made possible the combining of the data they derived into one seamless coverage. They all used multi-season satellite imagery (Landsat ETM+) from 1999-2001 in conjunction with digital elevation model (DEM) derived datasets (e.g. elevation, landform) to model natural and semi-natural vegetation. Vegetation classes were drawn from NatureServe's Ecological System Classification (Comer et al. 2003) or classes developed by the Hawaii Gap project. Additionally, all of the projects included land use classes that were employed to describe areas where natural vegetation has been altered. In many areas of the country these classes were derived from the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD). For the majority of classes and, in most areas of the country, a decision tree classifier was used to discriminate ecological system types. In some areas of the country, more manual techniques were used to discriminate small patch systems and systems not distinguishable through topography. The data contains multiple levels of thematic detail. At the most detailed level natural vegetation is represented by NatureServe's Ecological System classification (or in Hawaii the Hawaii GAP classification). These most detailed classifications have been crosswalked to the five highest levels of the National Vegetation Classification (NVC), Class, Subclass, Formation, Division and Macrogroup. This crosswalk allows users to display and analyze the data at different levels of thematic resolution. Developed areas, or areas dominated by introduced species, timber harvest, or water are represented by other classes, collectively refered to as land use classes; these land use classes occur at each of the thematic levels. Raster data in both ArcGIS Grid and ERDAS Imagine format is available for download at http://gis1.usgs.gov/csas/gap/viewer/land_cover/Map.aspx Six layer files are included in the download packages to assist the user in displaying the data at each of the Thematic levels in ArcGIS. In adition to the raster datasets the data is available in Web Mapping Services (WMS) format for each of the six NVC classification levels (Class, Subclass, Formation, Division, Macrogroup, Ecological System) at the following links. http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Class_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Subclass_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Formation_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Division_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Macrogroup_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_Ecological_Systems_Landuse/MapServer

The North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Management, in cooperation with the NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, developed the digital Water Supply Watersheds data to enhance planning, siting and impact analysis in areas directly affecting water supply intakes. This file outlines the extent of protected and critical areas and stream classifications for areas around water supply watersheds in which development directly affects a water supply intake. This file enables users to identify the areas which have special restrictions for building and development based on water supply intakes. This file is updated as changes occur.

This data was created to assist governmental agencies and others in making resource management decisions through use of a Geographic Information System (GIS).

system filename: wsw Revisions and updates to this layer include:

18.) filename: wsw496 The April 1, 1996 update: A) The Upper Frech Broad River (Asheville) water supply watershed was moved from the proposed coverage to the adopted coverage. B) The Mills River (Asheville) water supply watershed was moved from the proposed coverage to the adopted coverage. C) The French Broad River water supply watershed was moved from the adopted coverage into the proposed coverage. These edits affect Buncombe and Henderson Counties. 17.) filename: wsw396 The March 6, 1996 update: A) The Reedy Fork critical area was changed to 'WS-III NSW' to match the protected area. This affected the Greensboro 100k tile area. B) The Belews Creek protected area was changed to 'WS-IV' to match the critical area. This affected the Winston-Salem 100k tile area. 16.) filename: wsw196 The January 25, 1996 update: A) Protected boundary was altered in the Long Creek (Little Tennessee) watershed. The watershed name was renamed to be Rock Creek (Little Tennessee). This affected the Robbinsville 24k quad. B) Protected boundary was altered in the South Fork Catawba River watershed. This affected the Banoke 24k quad. C) Addition of protected boundary for the Belews Creek watershed. This affected the Belews Creek 24k quad. D) Watersheds were deleted by request of DEM-Tranters Creek which was on the Rocky Mount & Plymouth 100k quads and Stokely Hollow which was on the Asheville 100k quad. E) Extensive changes to the actual boundaries of the watersheds throughout the state in an effort to have them coincident with the Hydrologic Units adopted earlier by EHNR-DEM and USDA-NRCS. Boundaries coincident in both coverages were deleted from the watershed file and copied back from the hydrologic units file. PREVIOUS TO THE 1/25/96 FILE, THIS FILE WAS NAMED: NC.WSW 15.) filname: nc.wsw695 The June 30, 1995 update: A) Protected and critical boundaries were altered in the Hiawassee River watershed. This affected the Mocksville, Peachtree, Marble, and Andrews 24k quads. B) The protected boundary was altered in the South Fork Catawba River watershed in Catawbaw and Lincoln Counties. The Banoak, Reepsville, and Maiden 24k quads were affected. C) The entire WSW area in Bear Creek was deleted in Davie County, affecting the Mocksville and Calahan 24k quads. D) Protected and critical boundaries were altered in the North Toe watershed in Avery and Mitchell counties. This affects the Carvers Gap, Newland, Spruce Pine, and Linville Falls 24k quads. 14.) filename: nc.wsw595 The May 4, 1995 update: an arc was deleted which divided the South Yadkin River-Cooleemee protected area. The change affects the area within the Cool Springs, Cooleemee, Calahan, and Mocksville 24k quads. 13.) filename: nc.wsw195 The January 13, 1995 update: A) A new boundary was added to the Hiawassee River (Murphy) in the Hiawassee River Basin. This addition split the existing watershed, and the western half was deleted. The change affects the Hayesville, Peachtree, and Murphy 24k quads. 12.) filename: nc.wsw1194 The November 4, 1994 update: A) The Smith River WSW, in the Roanoke river basin, had one of its boundaries altered. The change affects the Northeastern Eden 24k quad. 11.) filename: nc.wsw994 The September 13, 1994 update: A) The Lands Creek in the Little Tennessee River Basin in Swain County on the Fontana Lake 100k quad had the PAT attributes added. 10.) filename: nc.wsw894 The August 26, 1994 update consisted of the following watershed adoptions (additions). A) The Deep River in Lee County, in the Cape Fear River Basin. B) The Deep Creek in Swain County, in the Little Tennessee River Basin. C) The Yadkin River in Davie County, in the Yadkin River Basin. D.) The Yadkin River in King County, in the Yadkin River Basin, E) The South Yadkin River in Cooleemee City, in the Yadkin River Basin. 9.) filename: nc.wsw594 The May 18, 1994 update: A) The Tar River WSW within the Tar-Pamlico river basin was deleted. 8.) filename: nc.wsw494 The April 28, 1994 update: A) All proposed areas were removed from the data and are managed separately. Only amended areas are now reflected in this data. 7.) filename: nc.wsw194 The January 12, 1994 update: A) The Campbell Creek watershed in the French Broad river basin had the northern boundary moved. The edits affected the Dellwood 24k quad. B) The South Fork Catawba in the Catawba Watershed had its classification modified from WS-IV CA to WS-IV. C)The South Fork Catawba in the Catawba Watershed had its protected area reduced in size. The change affects the Banoak and Reepsville 24k quads. 6.) filename: nc.wsw102893 The October 28, 1993 update: A) The South Fork Catawba had previously had the protected area deleted. An additional portion of the boundary had been deleted, which was supposed to remain. The boundary was added back into the coverage. The affected maps were the 24k Maiden, Reepsville, Lincolnton West, Hickory, and Banoak, 100k quads were Hickory and Gastonia. 5.) filename: nc.wsw101593 The October 15, 1993 update: A) The northern protected area boundary for Clark Creek was deleted and the east and west critical area buffers were redigitized. Affected maps are the 24k Reepsville and Maiden and the Hickory 100k quad. 4.) filename: The September 8, 1993 update: A) The Little Tennessee River (Fontana Lake) protected area had the southeastern radius line removed, and had a northern ridgeline added. Affected maps are the 24k Fontana Dam and Tuskeegee quads, and the Fontana Lake 100k quad. 3.) filename: wsw193 The January 22, 1993 update: A) Cold Water Creek (Lake Fisher) in the Yadkin River Basin was changed from WS-III to WS-IV. 2.) filename: The November 17, 1992 update: A) Stokely Hollow, 100k Asheboro quad changed from WS-I to WS-II. B) Corrected location of Reddies River intake for the Yadkin river basin, Wilkesboro 24k, Boone 100k. C) Changed location of watershed boundary, intake, and critical area for the South Fork New River, New River Basin, Jefferson 24k, West Jefferson 24k Boone 100k. 1.) filename: nc.pcarv.old (protected/critical area with the same state lake as the .coe coverage, but this version was interpreted from USGS maps) filename: nc.pcarv.coe (protected/critical area with the Army Corp of Engineers version of a state lake) filename: nc.pcarv Previous to August 1992, this file was called Public Water Supply watersheds and only included WS-I, WS-II, WS-III classifications. filename: nc.pca filename: nc.pca2

Shows the contours of Wayne County in 2-foot increments. Data is derived from Digital Elevation Model (DEM) raster data.

Publisher: Board of ElectionsVoter registration data as of the 2018 Mid-term Election. Voting Method Definitions:Label Description O ABSENTEE ONESTOP U ABSENTEE CURBSIDE M ABSENTEE BY MAIL B ABSENTEE DID NOT VOTE A ABSENTEE C CURBSIDE N ELIGIBLE DID NOT VOTE V IN-PERSON L LEGACY P PROVISIONAL T TRANSFER Party Definitions:Label Description CST CONSTITUTION DEM DEMOCRATIC GRE GREEN LIB LIBERTARIAN REP REPUBLICAN UNA UNAFFILIATED