Vector polygon map data of property parcels from Washoe County, Nevada containing 209,859 features.

​

Property parcel GIS map data consists of detailed information about individual land parcels, including their boundaries, ownership details, and geographic coordinates.

​

Property parcel data can be used to analyze and visualize land-related information for purposes such as real estate assessment, urban planning, or environmental management.

​

Available for viewing and sharing as a map in a Koordinates map viewer. This data is also available for export to DWG for CAD, PDF, KML, CSV, and GIS data formats, including Shapefile, MapInfo, and Geodatabase.

Vector polygon map data of property parcels from Las Vegas, Nevada, containing 794,465 features.

Property parcel GIS map data consists of detailed information about individual land parcels, including their boundaries, ownership details, and geographic coordinates.

Property parcel data can be used to analyze and visualize land-related information for purposes such as real estate assessment, urban planning, or environmental management.

Available for viewing and sharing as a map in a Koordinates map viewer. This data is also available for export to DWG for CAD, PDF, KML, CSV, and GIS data formats, including Shapefile, MapInfo, and Geodatabase.

This parcel layer contains the parcel's situs (physical) address maintained by the Planning Department. The parcel geometry provides a rough representation of tax parcels in relation to one another and to district boundaries. Parcels with multiple site addresses are represented by overlapping polygons.

Analysis of ‘Nevada County Land Use Survey 2005’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/fb334d6e-f04f-47ff-bca4-2a23239bb0cb on 28 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

Vector polygon map data of city limits from Las Vegas, Nevada containing 87 features.

City limits GIS (Geographic Information System) data provides valuable information about the boundaries of a city, which is crucial for various planning and decision-making processes. Urban planners and government officials use this data to understand the extent of their jurisdiction and to make informed decisions regarding zoning, land use, and infrastructure development within the city limits.

By overlaying city limits GIS data with other layers such as population density, land parcels, and environmental features, planners can analyze spatial patterns and identify areas for growth, conservation, or redevelopment. This data also aids in emergency management by defining the areas of responsibility for different emergency services, helping to streamline response efforts during crises..

This city limits data is available for viewing and sharing as a map in a Koordinates map viewer. This data is also available for export to DWG for CAD, PDF, KML, CSV, and GIS data formats, including Shapefile, MapInfo, and Geodatabase.

Every published digital survey is designated as either ‘Final’, or ‘Provisional’, depending upon its status in a peer review process. Final surveys are peer reviewed with extensive quality control methods to confirm that field attributes reflect the most detailed and specific land-use classification available, following the standard DWR Land Use Legendspecific to the survey year. Data sets are considered ‘final’ following the reconciliation of peer review comments and confirmation by the originating Regional Office. During final review, individual polygons are evaluated using a combination of aerial photointerpretation, satellite image multi-spectral data and time series analysis, comparison with other sources of land use data, and general knowledge of land use patterns at the local level.Provisional data sets have been reviewed for conformance with DWR’s published data record format, and for general agreement with other sources of land use trends. Comments based on peer review findings may not be reconciled, and no significant edits or changes are made to the original survey data.The 2005 Nevada County land use survey data was developed by the State of California, Department of Water Resources (DWR) through its Division of Integrated Regional Water Management (DIRWM) and Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management (DSIWM). Land use boundaries were digitized and land use was mapped by staff of DWR’s North Central Region using 2004 U.S.D.A National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery, and the Google Earth website. Land use polygons in agricultural areas were mapped in greater detail than areas of urban or native vegetation. Quality control procedures were performed jointly by staff at DWR’s DSIWM headquarters, under the leadership of Jean Woods, and North Central Region, under the supervision of: Kim Rosmaier. This data was developed to aid DWR’s ongoing efforts to monitor land use for the main purpose of determining current and projected water uses. The associated data are considered DWR enterprise GIS data, which meet all appropriate requirements of the DWR Spatial Data Standards, specifically the DWR Spatial Data Standards version 2.1, dated March 9, 2016. DWR makes no warranties or guarantees - either expressed or implied - as to the completeness, accuracy, or correctness of the data. DWR neither accepts nor assumes liability arising from or for any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading subject data. Comments, problems, improvements, updates, or suggestions should be forwarded to gis@water.ca.gov. This data represents a land use survey of San Francisco County conducted by the California Department of Water Resources, North Central Region Office staff. Land use field boundaries were digitized with ArcGIS 9.x using 2004 and 2005 NAIP imagery as the base. Agricultural fields were delineated by following actual field boundaries instead of using the centerlines of roads to represent the field borders. Field boundaries were not drawn to represent legal parcel (ownership) boundaries, and are not meant to be used as parcel boundaries. Sources of irrigation water were not identified. Before final processing, standard quality control procedures were performed jointly by staff at DWR’s North Central Region, and at DSIWM headquarters under the leadership of Jean Woods. Senior Land and Water Use Supervisor. After quality control procedures were completed, the data was finalized. The positional accuracy of the digital line work, which is based upon the orthorectified NAIP imagery, is approximately 6 meters. The land use attribute accuracy for agricultural fields is high, because almost every delineated field was visited by a surveyor. The accuracy is 95 percent because some errors may have occurred. Possible sources of attribute errors are: a) Human error in the identification of crop types, b) Data entry errors.

Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

Clark County Planned Land Use. This data is maintained by the Clark County Comprehensive Planning Department.

The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The All Roads Shapefile includes all features within the MTDB Super Class "Road/Path Features" distinguished where the MAF/TIGER Feature Classification Code (MTFCC) for the feature in MTDB that begins with "S". This includes all primary, secondary, local neighborhood, and rural roads, city streets, vehicular trails (4wd), ramps, service drives, alleys, parking lot roads, private roads for service vehicles (logging, oil fields, ranches, etc.), bike paths or trails, bridle/horse paths, walkways/pedestrian trails, and stairways.

This parcel layer contains additional Assessor, political, environmental, service related information, and owner mailing address. Owner name is not included. The parcel geometry provides a rough representation of parcels in relation to one another and to district boundaries. Parcels with multiple owners are represented by overlapping polygons.

This feature class is updated every business day using Python scripts and the Permit database. Please disregard the "Date Updated" field as it does not keep in sync with DWR's internal enterprise geodatabase updates. This dataset contains the places of use (POU) for water rights based on the polygon ID. A POU is the location (area) where permitted water is used. Since there can be multiple permits on the same POU site, this dataset contains duplicate area features where several permits may be stacked on top of each other spatially. The advantage to using this dataset is that all permits in NDWR’s Permit database are available. Use a filter or definition query to restrict the permits needed. If the permit does not have a polygon ID, the area feature for the permit will not be available in this dataset.Background:While NDWR’s Permit Database was created in 1992, water rights mapping started in August 2007. Water right places of use are mapped from the description or map included with the permit application. If township-range-section and quarter-quarter descriptions are provided, boundary lines are traced from the Public Land Survey System (PLSS) dataset provided by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). County parcel maps may also be used to trace boundaries of water use. If the POU does not follow PLSS or county parcel boundaries, the application map is georeferenced and the area is plotted from the boundary on the map. The Water Rights Section of NDWR is responsible for reviewing and approving water rights applications, for new appropriations and for changes to existing water rights, as well as evaluating and responding to protests of applications, approving subdivision dedications for water quantity, evaluating domestic well credits and relinquishments, issuing certificates for permitted water rights, conducting field investigations, and processing requests for extensions of time for filing proofs of completion and proofs of beneficial use.Please note that this POU feature class may not contain all water right information on a site or permit. POUs with boundaries for an entire basin or county are not drawn as the large area makes it difficult to see other POUs. POUs for stockwater permits were not consistently mapped before 2021. The GIS Team is working to map active permits that may have been previously skipped. The GIS datasets do not replace the need to review the Permit database and hard copy permit files and are intended for convenience in sharing information on a map, finding a location, seeing spatial patterns, and planning.Code Descriptions:app_status app_status_nameABN ABANDONED (inactive)ABR ABROGATED (inactive)APP APPLICATION (pending)CAN CANCELLED (inactive)CER CERTIFICATE (active)CUR CURTAILED (inactive)DEC DECREED (active)DEN DENIED (inactive)EXP EXPIRED (inactive)FOR FORFEITED (inactive)PER PERMIT (active)REJ REJECTED (inactive)REL RELINQUISHED (inactive)RES RESERVED (pending)RFA READY FOR ACTION (pending)RFP READY FOR ACTION PROTESTED (pending)RLP RELINQUISH A PORTION (active)RSC RESCINDED (inactive)RVK REVOKED (inactive)RVP REVOCABLE PERMIT (active)SUP SUPERSEDED (inactive)SUS SUSPENDED (inactive)VST VESTED RIGHT (pending)WDR WITHDRAWN (inactive)manner of use (mou) use_nameCOM COMMERCIALCON CONSTRUCTIONDEC AS DECREEDDOM DOMESTICDWR DEWATERINGENV ENVIRONMENTALIND INDUSTRIALIRC IRRIGATION-CAREY ACTIRD IRRIGATION-DLEIRR IRRIGATIONMM MINING AND MILLINGMUN MUNICIPALOTH OTHERPWR POWERQM QUASI-MUNICIPALREC RECREATIONALSTK STOCKWATERINGSTO STORAGEUKN UNKNOWNWLD WILDLIFEMMD MINING, MILLING AND DEWATERINGEVP EVAPORATIONsource source_nameEFF EFFLUENTGEO GEOTHERMALLAK LAKEOGW OTHER GROUND WATEROSW OTHER SURFACE WATERRES RESERVOIRSPR SPRINGSTO STORAGESTR STREAMUG UNDERGROUNDDate Field Descriptions:Permit Date—Date the permit was issued.File Date—Date application was filed at the Division.Sent for Publication—Date the notice that the application was filed was sent to the newspaper of record for publication.Last Publication—The last date of publication of said notice in the paper; 30 days from this date is the last day for filing a protest to an application.POC Filed Date—When a Proof of Completion of Work is accepted by this office, it becomes “filed” rather than just received. The filed date is the same as the received date.

Placer County: https://www.placer.ca.gov/departments/assessorEl Dorado: https://www.edcgov.us/Government/AssessorAt this point we cannot offer Nevada parcels for download. Please contact the assessors at Douglas County, Carson City County, or Washoe County directly for their parcel boundaries.Washoe County: https://www.washoecounty.us/assessorDouglas County: https://www.douglascountynv.gov/45/AssessorCarson City County: https://carson.org/government/departments-a-f/assessorSpatial Reference: NAD83 / UTM zone 10N (26910)Area Covered: Tahoe Basin, Nevada, CaliforniaUpdate Frequency: Quarterly

Planning and Zoning includes: Planned Land Use, Zoning, Historic Neighborhood Overlay District, Hard Rural Neighborhood Preservation, ROIS, PC Overlay, RNP Boundary, Flood Control Layers

BLM NV PLSSTownship: This dataset represents the GIS Version of the Public Land Survey System including both rectangular and non-rectangular surveys. The primary source for the data is cadastral survey records housed by the BLM supplemented with local records and geographic control coordinates from states, counties as well as other federal agencies such as the USGS and USFS. The data has been converted from source documents to digital form and transferred into a GIS format that is compliant with FGDC Cadastral Data Content Standards and Guidelines for publication. This data is optimized for data publication and sharing rather than for specific "production" or operation and maintenance. This data set includes the following: PLSS Fully Intersected (all of the PLSS feature at the atomic or smallest polygon level), PLSS Townships, First Divisions and Second Divisions (the hierarchical break down of the PLSS Rectangular surveys) PLSS Special surveys (non rectangular components of the PLSS) Meandered Water, Corners and Conflicted Areas (known areas of gaps or overlaps between Townships or state boundaries). The Entity-Attribute section of this metadata describes these components in greater detail.

This feature class contains parcel boundaries and their environmental covenant status within the Onda Verde Subdivision in Churchill County, Nevada. An environmental covenant is an instrument used to define the appropriate activities and/or uses on real property that has been subject to contamination. It is a recordable instrument that is attached to the deed and runs with the property. It is almost always used on a property that was subject to clean-up action by a regulatory authority, either the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) or the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). In 2005 environmental covenants were created with the passage of Senate Bill No. 263 by the Nevada Legislature. The covenants meet a need to protect both the responsible party and regulatory agencies. Responsible parties must invest significant resources for removing contamination and constructing and maintaining engineering controls to limit the potential exposure from remnant contamination. Regulatory agencies on the other hand, such as NDEP or the US EPA, are responsible for enforcing and overseeing clean-up actions to assure protections remain in-place and are effective through their design life. The Onda Verde subdivision is located within Operable Unit 2 of the Carson River Mercury Site (CRMS).