LC-MS analysis data (average of normalized values ± standard error).

1000 simulated data sets stored in a list of R dataframes used in support of Reisetter et al. (submitted) 'Mixture model normalization for non-targeted gas chromatography / mass spectrometry metabolomics data'. These are results after normalization using mean centering as described in Reisetter et al.

Normalized gene expression levels

Normalized 2020 and 2050 First Street flood risk data aggregated at the census-tract level. A lower number indicates less risk (0 is minimum) and a higher number indicates more risk (1 is maximum). The normalization process subtracts the mean from the local value and divides it by the standard deviation: ((tract_value - overall mean) / stand_dev). The overall mean is the national average of all census tracts.

If you are interested in acquiring First Street flood data, you can request to access the data here. More information on First Street's flood risk statistics can be found here and information on First Street's hazards can be found here.

No description is available. Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/82077d2c6ff994929e263133b1ed68c4 for complete metadata about this dataset.

BackgroundGene expression analysis is an essential part of biological and medical investigations. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is characterized with excellent sensitivity, dynamic range, reproducibility and is still regarded to be the gold standard for quantifying transcripts abundance. Parallelization of qPCR such as by microfluidic Taqman Fluidigm Biomark Platform enables evaluation of multiple transcripts in samples treated under various conditions. Despite advanced technologies, correct evaluation of the measurements remains challenging. Most widely used methods for evaluating or calculating gene expression data include geNorm and ΔΔCt, respectively. They rely on one or several stable reference genes (RGs) for normalization, thus potentially causing biased results. We therefore applied multivariable regression with a tailored error model to overcome the necessity of stable RGs.ResultsWe developed a RG independent data normalization approach based on a tailored linear error model for parallel qPCR data, called LEMming. It uses the assumption that the mean Ct values within samples of similarly treated groups are equal. Performance of LEMming was evaluated in three data sets with different stability patterns of RGs and compared to the results of geNorm normalization. Data set 1 showed that both methods gave similar results if stable RGs are available. Data set 2 included RGs which are stable according to geNorm criteria, but became differentially expressed in normalized data evaluated by a t-test. geNorm-normalized data showed an effect of a shifted mean per gene per condition whereas LEMming-normalized data did not. Comparing the decrease of standard deviation from raw data to geNorm and to LEMming, the latter was superior. In data set 3 according to geNorm calculated average expression stability and pairwise variation, stable RGs were available, but t-tests of raw data contradicted this. Normalization with RGs resulted in distorted data contradicting literature, while LEMming normalized data did not.ConclusionsIf RGs are coexpressed but are not independent of the experimental conditions the stability criteria based on inter- and intragroup variation fail. The linear error model developed, LEMming, overcomes the dependency of using RGs for parallel qPCR measurements, besides resolving biases of both technical and biological nature in qPCR. However, to distinguish systematic errors per treated group from a global treatment effect an additional measurement is needed. Quantification of total cDNA content per sample helps to identify systematic errors.

📰 Related Paper

Sichkar V. N. Effect of various dimension convolutional layer filters on traffic sign classification accuracy. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2019, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. DOI: 10.17586/2226-1494-2019-19-3-546-552 (Full-text available here ResearchGate.net/profile/Valentyn_Sichkar)

Test online with custom Traffic Sign here: https://valentynsichkar.name/mnist.html

:mortar_board: Related course for classification tasks

Design, Train & Test deep CNN for Image Classification. Join the course & enjoy new opportunities to get deep learning skills: https://www.udemy.com/course/convolutional-neural-networks-for-image-classification/

https://github.com/sichkar-valentyn/1-million-images-for-Traffic-Signs-Classification-tasks/blob/main/images/slideshow_classification.gif?raw=true%20=470x516" alt="CNN Course" title="CNN Course">

🗺️ Concept Map of the Course

https://github.com/sichkar-valentyn/1-million-images-for-Traffic-Signs-Classification-tasks/blob/main/images/concept_map.png?raw=true%20=570x410" alt="Concept map" title="Concept map">

👉 Join the Course

https://www.udemy.com/course/convolutional-neural-networks-for-image-classification/

Content

This is ready to use preprocessed data saved into pickle file.
Preprocessing stages are as follows:
- Normalizing whole data by dividing / 255.0.
- Dividing whole data into three datasets: train, validation and test.
- Normalizing whole data by subtracting mean image and dividing by standard deviation.
- Transposing every dataset to make channels come first.

mean image and standard deviation were calculated from train dataset and applied to all datasets.
When using user's image for classification, it has to be preprocessed firstly in the same way: normalized, subtracted with mean image and divided by standard deviation.

Data written as dictionary with following keys:
x_train: (59000, 1, 28, 28)
y_train: (59000,)
x_validation: (1000, 1, 28, 28)
y_validation: (1000,)
x_test: (1000, 1, 28, 28)
y_test: (1000,)

Contains pretrained weights model_params_ConvNet1.pickle for the model with following architecture:
Input --> Conv --> ReLU --> Pool --> Affine --> ReLU --> Affine --> Softmax

Parameters:

• Input is 1-channeled GrayScale image.
• 32 filters of Convolutional Layer.
• Stride for Pool is 2 and height = width = 2.
• Number of hidden neurons is 500.
• Number of output neurons is 10.

Architecture also can be understood as follows:
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F3400968%2Fc23041248e82134b7d43ed94307b720e%2FModel_1_Architecture_MNIST.png?generation=1563654250901965&alt=media" alt="">

Acknowledgements

Initial data is MNIST that was collected by Yann LeCun, Corinna Cortes, Christopher J.C. Burges.

Data underlying Figure 5. Upper Soldier Creek, KS predicted daily total phosphorus loads normalized for year of average precipitation adjusted for climate change (2021 – 2050) based on GISS-E2-H change scenario for RCP4.5 and implementation of least-cost optimized management solutions for 2014. Target load of 1039.6 lb P/day is shown with dashed line to highlight projected exceedances.

This dataset provides processed and normalized/standardized indices for the management tool group focused on 'Growth Strategies'. Derived from five distinct raw data sources, these indices are specifically designed for comparative longitudinal analysis, enabling the examination of trends and relationships across different empirical domains (web search, literature, academic publishing, and executive adoption). The data presented here represent transformed versions of the original source data, aimed at achieving metric comparability. Users requiring the unprocessed source data should consult the corresponding Growth Strategies dataset in the Management Tool Source Data (Raw Extracts) Dataverse. Data Files and Processing Methodologies: Google Trends File (Prefix: GT_): Normalized Relative Search Interest (RSI) Input Data: Native monthly RSI values from Google Trends (Jan 2004 - Jan 2025) for the query "growth strategies" + "growth strategy" + "growth strategies business". Processing: None. Utilizes the original base-100 normalized Google Trends index. Output Metric: Monthly Normalized RSI (Base 100). Frequency: Monthly. Google Books Ngram Viewer File (Prefix: GB_): Normalized Relative Frequency Input Data: Annual relative frequency values from Google Books Ngram Viewer (1950-2022, English corpus, no smoothing) for the query Growth Strategies + Growth Strategy. Processing: Annual relative frequency series normalized (peak year = 100). Output Metric: Annual Normalized Relative Frequency Index (Base 100). Frequency: Annual. Crossref.org File (Prefix: CR_): Normalized Relative Publication Share Index Input Data: Absolute monthly publication counts matching Growth Strategies-related keywords [("growth strategies" OR ...) AND (...) - see raw data for full query] in titles/abstracts (1950-2025), alongside total monthly Crossref publications. Deduplicated via DOIs. Processing: Monthly relative share calculated (Growth Strat. Count / Total Count). Monthly relative share series normalized (peak month's share = 100). Output Metric: Monthly Normalized Relative Publication Share Index (Base 100). Frequency: Monthly. Bain & Co. Survey - Usability File (Prefix: BU_): Normalized Usability Index Input Data: Original usability percentages (%) from Bain surveys for specific years: Growth Strategies (1996, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004); Growth Strategy Tools (2006, 2008). Note: Not reported after 2008. Processing: Semantic Grouping: Data points for "Growth Strategies" and "Growth Strategy Tools" were treated as a single conceptual series. Normalization: Combined series normalized relative to its historical peak (Max % = 100). Output Metric: Biennial Estimated Normalized Usability Index (Base 100 relative to historical peak). Frequency: Biennial (Approx.). Bain & Co. Survey - Satisfaction File (Prefix: BS_): Standardized Satisfaction Index Input Data: Original average satisfaction scores (1-5 scale) from Bain surveys for specific years: Growth Strategies (1996-2004); Growth Strategy Tools (2006, 2008). Note: Not reported after 2008. Processing: Semantic Grouping: Data points treated as a single conceptual series. Standardization (Z-scores): Using Z = (X - 3.0) / 0.891609. Index Scale Transformation: Index = 50 + (Z * 22). Output Metric: Biennial Standardized Satisfaction Index (Center=50, Range?[1,100]). Frequency: Biennial (Approx.). File Naming Convention: Files generally follow the pattern: PREFIX_Tool_Processed.csv or similar, where the PREFIX indicates the data source (GT_, GB_, CR_, BU_, BS_). Consult the parent Dataverse description (Management Tool Comparative Indices) for general context and the methodological disclaimer. For original extraction details (specific keywords, URLs, etc.), refer to the corresponding Growth Strategies dataset in the Raw Extracts Dataverse. Comprehensive project documentation provides full details on all processing steps.

Dataset

This dataset was created by SurajKumarJha21

Contents

These data were compiled for evaluating river-reach level vegetation greenness data in the riparian corridor of the Colorado River delta as specified under Minute 319 of the 1944 Water Treaty. The seven reach areas from the Northerly International Boundary (NIB) to the end of the delta at the Sea of Cortez were defined for research activities. Also, these seven reaches are being monitored under Minute 323 of the 1944 Water Treaty. Additionally, these data were compiled for evaluating restoration-level vegetation greenness data in Reach 2 and Reach 4, as specified under Minute 323 of the 1944 Water Treaty. Objectives of our study were to measure satellite vegetation index data, specifically using the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) from Landsat, for the average of months in summer-fall (May to October) for the seven reaches, for the full riparian corridor, and for four restoration sites, from 2000 through 2020. These data represent measurements of enhanced vegetation index (EVI) La ...

This dataset is an annual time-serie of Landsat Analysis Ready Data (ARD)-derived Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) computed from Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) and Landsat 8 Opeational Land Imager (OLI). To ensure a consistent dataset, Landsat 7 has not been used because the Scan Line Correct (SLC) failure creates gaps into the data. NDWI quantifies plant water content by measuring the difference between Near-Infrared (NIR) and Short Wave Infrared (SWIR) (or Green) channels using this generic formula: (NIR - SWIR) / (NIR + SWIR) For Landsat sensors, this corresponds to the following bands: Landsat 5, NDVI = (Band 4 – Band 2) / (Band 4 + Band 2). Landsat 8, NDVI = (Band 5 – Band 3) / (Band 5 + Band 3). NDWI values ranges from -1 to +1. NDWI is a good proxy for plant water stress and therefore useful for drought monitoring and early warning. NDWI is sometimes alos refered as Normalized Difference Moisture Index (NDMI) Standard Deviation is also provided for each time step. Data format: GeoTiff This dataset has been genereated with the Swiss Data Cube (http://www.swissdatacube.ch)

📰 Related Paper

Sichkar V. N. Effect of various dimension convolutional layer filters on traffic sign classification accuracy. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2019, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. DOI: 10.17586/2226-1494-2019-19-3-546-552 (Full-text available here ResearchGate.net/profile/Valentyn_Sichkar)

Test online with custom Traffic Sign here: https://valentynsichkar.name/cifar10.html

:mortar_board: Related course for classification tasks

Design, Train & Test deep CNN for Image Classification. Join the course & enjoy new opportunities to get deep learning skills: https://www.udemy.com/course/convolutional-neural-networks-for-image-classification/

https://github.com/sichkar-valentyn/1-million-images-for-Traffic-Signs-Classification-tasks/blob/main/images/slideshow_classification.gif?raw=true%20=470x516" alt="CNN Course" title="CNN Course">

🗺️ Concept Map of the Course

https://github.com/sichkar-valentyn/1-million-images-for-Traffic-Signs-Classification-tasks/blob/main/images/concept_map.png?raw=true%20=570x410" alt="Concept map" title="Concept map">

👉 Join the Course

https://www.udemy.com/course/convolutional-neural-networks-for-image-classification/

Content

This is ready to use preprocessed data saved into pickle file.
Preprocessing stages are as follows:
- Normalizing whole data by dividing / 255.0.
- Dividing whole data into three datasets: train, validation and test.
- Normalizing whole data by subtracting mean image and dividing by standard deviation.
- Transposing every dataset to make channels come first.

mean image and standard deviation were calculated from train dataset and applied to all datasets.
When using user's image for classification, it has to be preprocessed firstly in the same way: normalized, subtracted with mean image and divided by standard deviation.

Data written as dictionary with following keys:
x_train: (49000, 3, 32, 32)
y_train: (49000,)
x_validation: (1000, 3, 32, 32)
y_validation: (1000,)
x_test: (1000, 3, 32, 32)
y_test: (1000,)

Contains pretrained weights model_params_ConvNet1.pickle for the model with following architecture:
Input --> Conv --> ReLU --> Pool --> Affine --> ReLU --> Affine --> Softmax

Parameters:

• Input is 3-channeled RGB image.
• 32 filters of Convolutional Layer.
• Stride for Pool is 2 and height = width = 2.
• Number of hidden neurons is 500.
• Number of output neurons is 10.

Architecture also can be understood as follows:
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F3400968%2F5d50bf46a9494d60016759b4690e6662%2FModel_1_Architecture.png?generation=1563650302359604&alt=media" alt="">

Acknowledgements

Initial data is CIFAR-10 that was collected by Alex Krizhevsky, Vinod Nair, and Geoffrey Hinton.

This updated version includes a Python script (glucose_analysis.py) that performs statistical evaluation of the glucose normalization process described in the associated thesis. The script supports key analyses, including normality assessment (Shapiro–Wilk test), variance homogeneity (Levene’s test), mean comparison (ANOVA), effect size estimation (Cohen’s d), and calculation of confidence intervals for the mean difference. These results validate the impact of Min-Max normalization on clinical data structure and usability within CDSS workflows. The script is designed to be reproducible and complements the processed dataset already included in this repository.

N = number of individuals. Adult females groomed others the most, while adult males received the most grooming. Values were averaged across groups and years.

Normalized Average MAP Amplitude (Fluid Compensated) curve from Schlumberger. Measured in electric potential difference.

This dataset provides processed and normalized/standardized indices for the management tool group focused on 'Mission and Vision Statements', including related concepts like Purpose Statements. Derived from five distinct raw data sources, these indices are specifically designed for comparative longitudinal analysis, enabling the examination of trends and relationships across different empirical domains (web search, literature, academic publishing, and executive adoption). The data presented here represent transformed versions of the original source data, aimed at achieving metric comparability. Users requiring the unprocessed source data should consult the corresponding Mission/Vision dataset in the Management Tool Source Data (Raw Extracts) Dataverse. Data Files and Processing Methodologies: Google Trends File (Prefix: GT_): Normalized Relative Search Interest (RSI) Input Data: Native monthly RSI values from Google Trends (Jan 2004 - Jan 2025) for the query "mission statement" + "vision statement" + "mission and vision corporate". Processing: None. Utilizes the original base-100 normalized Google Trends index. Output Metric: Monthly Normalized RSI (Base 100). Frequency: Monthly. Google Books Ngram Viewer File (Prefix: GB_): Normalized Relative Frequency Input Data: Annual relative frequency values from Google Books Ngram Viewer (1950-2022, English corpus, no smoothing) for the query Mission Statements + Vision Statements + Purpose Statements + Mission and Vision. Processing: Annual relative frequency series normalized (peak year = 100). Output Metric: Annual Normalized Relative Frequency Index (Base 100). Frequency: Annual. Crossref.org File (Prefix: CR_): Normalized Relative Publication Share Index Input Data: Absolute monthly publication counts matching Mission/Vision-related keywords [("mission statement" OR ...) AND (...) - see raw data for full query] in titles/abstracts (1950-2025), alongside total monthly Crossref publications. Deduplicated via DOIs. Processing: Monthly relative share calculated (Mission/Vision Count / Total Count). Monthly relative share series normalized (peak month's share = 100). Output Metric: Monthly Normalized Relative Publication Share Index (Base 100). Frequency: Monthly. Bain & Co. Survey - Usability File (Prefix: BU_): Normalized Usability Index Input Data: Original usability percentages (%) from Bain surveys for specific years: Mission/Vision (1993); Mission Statements (1996); Mission and Vision Statements (1999-2017); Purpose, Mission, and Vision Statements (2022). Processing: Semantic Grouping: Data points across the different naming conventions were treated as a single conceptual series. Normalization: Combined series normalized relative to its historical peak (Max % = 100). Output Metric: Biennial Estimated Normalized Usability Index (Base 100 relative to historical peak). Frequency: Biennial (Approx.). Bain & Co. Survey - Satisfaction File (Prefix: BS_): Standardized Satisfaction Index Input Data: Original average satisfaction scores (1-5 scale) from Bain surveys for specific years (same names/years as Usability). Processing: Semantic Grouping: Data points treated as a single conceptual series. Standardization (Z-scores): Using Z = (X - 3.0) / 0.891609. Index Scale Transformation: Index = 50 + (Z * 22). Output Metric: Biennial Standardized Satisfaction Index (Center=50, Range?[1,100]). Frequency: Biennial (Approx.). File Naming Convention: Files generally follow the pattern: PREFIX_Tool_Processed.csv or similar, where the PREFIX indicates the data source (GT_, GB_, CR_, BU_, BS_). Consult the parent Dataverse description (Management Tool Comparative Indices) for general context and the methodological disclaimer. For original extraction details (specific keywords, URLs, etc.), refer to the corresponding Mission/Vision dataset in the Raw Extracts Dataverse. Comprehensive project documentation provides full details on all processing steps.

Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) for the western United States, from 1989-2002.

The data set contains MODIS Normalized Differenced Vegetation Index (NDVI) monthly averages for the summer months of June, July and August in the Lena Delta. The data are based on NDVI monthly average values derived from MODIS satellite data (MOD13A3) with a pixel size of one kilometer over a period from 2009 to 2013. In the Lena Delta it is possible to distinguished three terraces (terrace 1 (LD T1), terrace 2 (LD-T2) and terrace 3 (LD-T3)), because the vegetation structure on the terraces are quite different to each other. Please refer also to Morgenstern et. al (2011, doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.758728). […]

No description is available. Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/7bbe3044073a2d425f3781750330f553 for complete metadata about this dataset.