Facebook
TwitterMilitary Map of Northern Virgnia 1865
Facebook
TwitterThis map provides the location of both park amenities and trail networks for parks in and around Leesburg, Virginia. The parks vary in size, from the 1/2 acre Catoctin Skate Park to the 138 acre Ida Lee Park. They are all open to the public from dawn to dusk. The amenity information shown was collected during a crowdsourcing effort between AOL staff and Loudoun County Office of Mapping & Geographic Information in May 2015 and individual Mapping & Geographic Information and Parks and Recreation staff in October 2015. Crowdsourcing involves groups of volunteers collecting data and information & was specifically undertaken on AOL's Monster Help Day, which is a world-wide event that encourages volenteerism. This was the third collaboration between AOL staff and Office of Mapping & Geographic Information to collect park amenity information in Loudoun County, which occurred in both early 2013 and 2014 on previous AOL Monster Help Days. The parks shown are administered by the Town of Leesburg, Loudoun County Parks and Recreation, and Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority.
Facebook
TwitterTrails within and around Fairfax County that are not maintained by Fairfax County. Contributors include: the National Park Service, Town of Herndon, Reston Association, City of Fairfax, Burke Center Conservancy, the Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority, and others.
Facebook
TwitterIn December of 1829, nine Lucases of Loudoun County left Northern Virginia for Hampton Roads, where they boarded a brig bound for the western coast of Africa. Two of the men, Mars and Jesse Lucas, had recently been emancipated by Albert and Townsend Heaton of Loudoun County. Over the next decade, the two sets of brothers corresponded about family back home in Loudoun and the challenges of life in Liberia. Seven of those letters are in the Loudoun Museum in Leesburg, Virginia.
This Story Map includes excerpts (and links to copies of) the letters, the locations mentioned within them, and a little about the events that led the Lucas family and other emancipated people to move across the Atlantic for a new life. It was developed as a collaboration among Museum staff, volunteers, and staff from the Loudoun County Office of Mapping and Information.
If you have questions, please contact the Loudoun Museum. For a shortcut to this Story Map, please visit loudounmuseum.org/lucas-heaton....
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.loc.gov/item/gvhs01.vhs00317/TitleMap of Albemarle : Made under the direction of Maj. A.H. Campbell Capt. Engs. in charge of Top. Dept. D.N.V. from surveys and reconnaissancesNamesConfederate States of America. Army. Dept. of Northern Virginia. Chief Engineer's Office.Campbell, Albert H. (Albert Henry), 1826-1899.Dwight, C. S.Created / Published[S.l. : Chief Engineer's Office D.N.V., 1864].Headings- Gilmer, Jeremy Francis,--1818-1883--Map collection- Albemarle County (Va.)--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Maps- United States--Virginia--Albemarle CountyNotes- "Map from the Confederate Engineer Bureau in Richmond, Va. General J.F. Gilmer, Chief Engineer[.] Presented to the Virginia Historical Society by his only daughter, Mrs. J.F. Minis, Sav[ana]h, Ga."--Note on map.- Forms part of the Gilmer Map Collection.- Relief shown by hachures.- Shows towns, waterways, roads, geographical features and land owners.- Available also through the Library of Congress web site as a raster image.- Gift of Mrs. Louisa Porter (Gilmer) Minis (i.e., Mrs. J. F. Minis), Savannah, Ga., in 1911.- Manuscripts o.s. Library of Congress, Geography and Map Division.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset represents the boundaries of Fairfax County Potential Wetlands Areas. Applicants for many plan types are required to certify that all required wetlands permits will be acquired before land disturbance begins in a "wetlands statement". This data can assist property owners and plan preparers in preliminary identification of potential wetlands for which such permits would be necessary.
Applicants for Site Plans must complete the "Potential for Wetlands" information box on the site plan cover sheet. This data is referenced as the "County Potential Wetland Area Map" referred to by the site plan cover sheet.
Landowners and plan preparers should use this information in preliminary phases of projects to identify the need for further study of possible wetlands. This data does not replace the need for site-specific RPA delineation when required by code and does not replace other field analysis required when wetlands permits are necessary from the Army Corps of Engineers.
These areas were classified as Potential Wetlands by intersecting the datasets described below.
Datasets:
Less than 5% Slope: The 2018 Bare Earth Digital Elevation Model (DEM) was used to identify areas in the county with a slope value of 5% or less. Areas with this topography are more likely to be wetlands.
Hydric Soils: These soil types were identified in the 2018 Soils Map by Northern Virginia Soil & Water Conservation District. These are soil types that in an undrained condition, are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during a growing season to develop an anaerobic condition that supports the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation.
Impervious Surface: The assessment of impervious surface was derived using the 2017 Planimetric Data.
Contact: Land Development Services
Data Accessibility: Publicly Available
Update Frequency: As Needed
Last Revision Date: 11/16/2023
Creation Date: 11/16/2023
Layer Name: LDSAMGR.POTENTIAL_WETLANDS
Facebook
TwitterVirginia LiDARThe Virginia LiDAR Inventory Web Mapping Application provides access to LiDAR point cloud and individual project metadata collected in the Commonwealth of Virginia according to the USGS 3DEP specification. Data is obtained from NOAA and USGS data portals. LiDAR Point Clouds are compressed for file storage and transfer. Informational Access Type:1) LiDAR Project Metadata: To download individual LiDAR project Metadata, click on a LiDAR inventory polygon for link to the host FTP site. Once at the host site, locate appropriate directory and .zip file to receive project documentation and accompanying project files. For use within ArcGIS, the geospatial grid and inventory data powering the VGIN LiDAR download inventory services can be downloaded under conversion and analysis resources below.2) LiDAR Point Clouds (Single): To download individual tiles, zoom in on the map until the tile grid appears. The VGIN Composite Geocoding service is available to use when querying by physical address, feature, or community anchor institution name. Click a tile to identify grid information for individual LiDAR Point clouds. Columns note where the LiDAR is hosted and what format is available for download. In many instances, multiple results are returned due to multiple file formats and flight years. If LiDAR data is missing spatial reference information please refer to the metadata in step 1 above. Tile grids are stacked so you will need to scroll through selections:3) LiDAR Point Clouds (Bulk): To download multiple files in a single FTP directory folder, which can be a necessity in many instances, consider the use of a multi-file download manager plugin to use with your browser in conjunction with the URLs provided on the LiDAR inventory polygon. If LiDAR data is missing spatial reference information please refer to the metadata in step 1 above. For use within ArcGIS, the geospatial grid and inventory data powering the VGIN LiDAR Download Inventory Services can be downloaded under conversion and resources below.Conversion and Resources:Convert to LAS from USGS/NOAA hosted .LAZ filesDownload LiDAR Inventory Data Project FootprintsDownload LiDAR Inventory Tile GridContact:For questions about the data please contact USGS For questions about the application please contact vbmp@vdem.virginia.gov
Facebook
TwitterThe database for the Washington West 30- by 60-minute quadrangle covers an area of approximately 4,884 square kilometers (1,343 square miles) in and west of the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area. The eastern part of the area is highly urbanized, and more rural areas to the west are rapidly being developed. The area lies entirely within the Chesapeake Bay drainage basin and mostly within the Potomac River watershed. It contains part of the Nation's main north-south transportation corridor east of the Blue Ridge Mountains, consisting of Interstate Highway 95, U.S. Highway 1, and railroads, as well as parts of the Capital Beltway and Interstate Highway 66. Extensive Federal land holdings in addition to those in Washington, D.C., include the Marine Corps Development and Education Command at Quantico, Fort Belvoir, Vint Hill Farms Station, the Naval Ordnance Station at Indian Head, the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historic Park, Great Falls Park, and Manassas National Battlefield Park. The quadrangle contains most of Washington, D.C.; part or all of Arlington, Culpeper, Fairfax, Fauquier, Loudoun, Prince William, Rappahannock, and Stafford Counties in northern Virginia; and parts of Charles, Montgomery, and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland. The Washington West quadrangle spans four geologic provinces. From west to east these provinces are the Blue Ridge province, the early Mesozoic Culpeper basin, the Piedmont province, and the Coastal Plain province. There is some overlap in ages of rocks in the Blue Ridge and Piedmont provinces. The Blue Ridge province, which occupies the western part of the quadrangle, contains metamorphic and igneous rocks of Mesoproterozoic to Early Cambrian age. Mesoproterozoic (Grenville-aged) rocks are mostly granitic gneisses, although older meta-igneous rocks are found as xenoliths. Small areas of Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks nonconformably overlie Mesoproterozoic rocks. Neoproterozoic granitic rocks of the Robertson River Igneous Suite intruded the Mesoproterozoic rocks. The Mesoproterozoic rocks are nonconformably overlain by Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks of the Fauquier and Lynchburg Groups, which in turn are overlain by metabasalt of the Catoctin Formation. The Catoctin Formation is overlain by Lower Cambrian clastic metasedimentary rocks of the Chilhowee Group. The Piedmont province is exposed in the east-central part of the map area, between overlapping sedimentary units of the Culpeper basin on the west and those of the Coastal Plain province on the east. In this area, the Piedmont province contains Neoproterozoic and lower Paleozoic metamorphosed sedimentary, volcanic, and plutonic rocks. Allochthonous mélange complexes on the western side of the Piedmont are bordered on the east by metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks of the Chopawamsic Formation, which has been interpreted as part of a volcanic arc. The mélange complexes are unconformably overlain by metasedimentary rocks of the Popes Head Formation. The Silurian and Ordovician Quantico Formation is the youngest metasedimentary unit in this part of the Piedmont (Pavlides and others, 1980). Igneous rocks include the Garrisonville Mafic Complex, transported ultramafic and mafic inclusions in mélanges, monzogranite of the Dale City pluton, and Ordovician tonalitic and granitic plutons. Jurassic diabase dikes are the youngest intrusions. The fault boundary between rocks of the Blue Ridge and Piedmont provinces is concealed beneath the Culpeper basin in this area but is exposed farther south (Mixon and others, 2000). Early Mesozoic rocks of the Culpeper basin unconformably overlie those of the Piedmont and Blue Ridge provinces in the central part of the quadrangle. The north-northeast-trending extensional basin contains Upper Triassic to Lower Jurassic nonmarine sedimentary rocks. Lower Jurassic sedimentary strata are interbedded with basalt flows, and both Upper Triassic and Lower Jurassic strata are intruded by diabase of Early Jurassic age. The Bull Run Mountain fault, a major Mesozoic normal fault characterized by down-to-the-east displacement, separates rocks of the Culpeper basin from those of the Blue Ridge province on the west. On the east, the contact between rocks of the Culpeper basin and those of the Piedmont province is an unconformity which has been locally disrupted by normal faults. Sediments of the Coastal Plain province unconformably overlie rocks of the Piedmont province along the Fall Zone and occupy the eastern part of the quadrangle. Lower Cretaceous deposits of the Potomac Formation consist of fluvial-deltaic gravels, sands, silts, and clays. Discontinuous fluvial and estuarine terrace deposits of Pleistocene and middle to late Tertiary age flank the modern Potomac River valley unconformably capping these Cretaceous strata and the crystalline basement where the Cretaceous has been removed by erosion. East of the Potomac River, the Potomac Formation is onlapped and unconformably overlain by a westward thinning wedge of marine sedimentary deposits of Late Cretaceous and early and late Tertiary age. Basement rooted Coastal Plain faults of Tertiary to Quaternary age occur along the Fall Zone and this part of the inner Coastal Plain. These Coastal Plain faults have geomorphic expression that appear to influence river drainage patterns (Mixon and others, 1972; Seiders and Mixon, 1981; Fleming and others, 1994).
Facebook
TwitterFairfax Connector is the largest local bus system in the Northern Virginia region transporting approximately 26,000 passengers on 93 routes daily. This system map shows all Fairfax Connector routes in service.Contact: Fairfax County Department of Transportation (FCDOT)Data Accessibility: PublicUpdate Frequency: As needed
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset combines the work of several different projects to create a seamless data set for the contiguous United States. Data from four regional Gap Analysis Projects and the LANDFIRE project were combined to make this dataset. In the northwestern United States (Idaho, Oregon, Montana, Washington and Wyoming) data in this map came from the Northwest Gap Analysis Project. In the southwestern United States (Colorado, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah) data used in this map came from the Southwest Gap Analysis Project. The data for Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Virginia came from the Southeast Gap Analysis Project and the California data was generated by the updated California Gap land cover project. The Hawaii Gap Analysis project provided the data for Hawaii. In areas of the county (central U.S., Northeast, Alaska) that have not yet been covered by a regional Gap Analysis Project, data from the Landfire project was used. Similarities in the methods used by these projects made possible the combining of the data they derived into one seamless coverage. They all used multi-season satellite imagery (Landsat ETM+) from 1999-2001 in conjunction with digital elevation model (DEM) derived datasets (e.g. elevation, landform) to model natural and semi-natural vegetation. Vegetation classes were drawn from NatureServe's Ecological System Classification (Comer et al. 2003) or classes developed by the Hawaii Gap project. Additionally, all of the projects included land use classes that were employed to describe areas where natural vegetation has been altered. In many areas of the country these classes were derived from the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD). For the majority of classes and, in most areas of the country, a decision tree classifier was used to discriminate ecological system types. In some areas of the country, more manual techniques were used to discriminate small patch systems and systems not distinguishable through topography. The data contains multiple levels of thematic detail. At the most detailed level natural vegetation is represented by NatureServe's Ecological System classification (or in Hawaii the Hawaii GAP classification). These most detailed classifications have been crosswalked to the five highest levels of the National Vegetation Classification (NVC), Class, Subclass, Formation, Division and Macrogroup. This crosswalk allows users to display and analyze the data at different levels of thematic resolution. Developed areas, or areas dominated by introduced species, timber harvest, or water are represented by other classes, collectively refered to as land use classes; these land use classes occur at each of the thematic levels. Raster data in both ArcGIS Grid and ERDAS Imagine format is available for download at http://gis1.usgs.gov/csas/gap/viewer/land_cover/Map.aspx Six layer files are included in the download packages to assist the user in displaying the data at each of the Thematic levels in ArcGIS. In adition to the raster datasets the data is available in Web Mapping Services (WMS) format for each of the six NVC classification levels (Class, Subclass, Formation, Division, Macrogroup, Ecological System) at the following links. http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Class_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Subclass_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Formation_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Division_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_NVC_Macrogroup_Landuse/MapServer http://gis1.usgs.gov/arcgis/rest/services/gap/GAP_Land_Cover_Ecological_Systems_Landuse/MapServer
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMShttps://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMS
A dataset listing the richest zip codes in Virginia per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.
Facebook
TwitterThe 2024 cartographic boundary shapefiles are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The records in this file allow users to map the parts of the 119th Congressional Districts that overlap a particular county. Congressional districts are the 435 areas from which people are elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. After the apportionment of congressional seats among the states based on census population counts, each state is responsible for establishing congressional districts for the purpose of electing representatives. Each congressional district is to be as equal in population to all other congressional districts in a state as practicable. The 119th Congress is seated from January 2025 through December 2026. In Connecticut, Illinois, and New Hampshire, the Redistricting Data Program (RDP) participant did not define the CDs to cover all of the state or state equivalent area. In these areas with no CDs defined, the code "ZZ" has been assigned, which is treated as a single CD for purposes of data presentation. The cartographic boundary files for the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas (American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands) each contain a single record for the non-voting delegate district in these areas. The generalzied boundaries of all other congressional districts are based on information provided to the Census Bureau by the states by May 31, 2024. The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The generalized boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are based on those as of January 1, 2024, primarily as reported through the Census Bureau's Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS).
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Facebook
TwitterMilitary Map of Northern Virgnia 1865