In 2022, Texas was the state recording the highest volume of fatalities resulting from alcohol-impaired driving at ***** number of fatalities, followed by California, which reported around ***** fatalities from drunk driving. These two states alone, out of 51, account for nearly ********* of the total fatalities incurred by alcohol-impaired driving. The Golden state amounted to the largest share of motor vehicle registrations in the country in 2021.
In 2021, *** Canadians were killed in a road crash that involved a drunk driver, the lowest number in the provided time interval. The number of people killed in road crashes due to drunk driving has, in general, declined from 1996 to 2021. This statistic illustrates the number of people killed in road crashes that involved drunk driving in Canada from 1996 to 2021.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Driving Under the Influence (DUI) Crashes reports the number of recorded DUI crashes, fatalities, and injuries per town, for a given year. Domain
This dataset contains information on Death Rate according to age and race which is caused by impaired driving in year 2012 and 2014.
In 2021, more than one out of four Canadians killed in a road accident were involved in a crash with a drunk driver, a significant decrease from the previous year. This statistic illustrates the share of people killed in road crashes that involved drinking drivers in Canada from 1996 to 2021.
In 2023, the number of traffic accidents caused by driving under the influence of alcohol amounted to just over 13 thousand cases, a decrease compared to the previous year but still notably lower than in the years prior to that. Drink-driving accidents in South Korea has overall decreased in the last years.
https://data.gov.tw/licensehttps://data.gov.tw/license
In 2023, the authorities in Japan reported *** fatal accidents involving drunk driving, decreasing to a decade low. Fatal accidents were several times as likely to occur when the motor vehicle driver was under the influence of alcohol.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Background: The use of legal sanctions is often framed as a way to deter driving under the influence (DUI). Yet little research has assessed frequent drinkers’ knowledge of DUI penalties. Objectives: To assess the general public’s knowledge of DUI penalties (an important element of deterrence) in their state and factors associated with more accurate knowledge. Methods: This US-based cross-sectional study used data from a Connect Platform survey of adult drinkers (n = 583, 58.0% male, 41.4% female) that asked their beliefs on the usual DUI fine and jail time penalty in their state, and how much they expected to be charged if imprisoned (jail fee). Responses were compared with data on minimum/maximum DUI penalties that appear in state statutes pertaining to DUI. For fines, responses were considered accurate if within $100 of the penalty on statute, and for jail time, if they matched the penalty on statute. Regression models were used to assess respondent characteristics associated with accurate penalty knowledge. Results: Among respondents, 83.7% and 67.2% underestimated the minimum DUI fine and jail time penalty in their state, respectively, and 8.7% and 19.7% overestimated. Although 75.4% of respondents lived in a state that charged jail fees, less than half were aware of this. No demographic or characteristic was consistently associated with accurate penalty knowledge across regression models (p > .05). Conclusions: The majority of respondents underestimated the DUI penalty in their state and suggest that large-scale campaigns to educate the public on the severity of DUI penalties are warranted.
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Indiana is apparently on track to legalize Sunday package sales of alcoholic beverages for carry out. One argument promulgated by enemies of Sunday sales is that permitting such sales would significantly increase DUI and vehicle-related deaths due to alcohol. This dataset is to partially investigate that question.
This data was compiled from individual state records at Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility (https://www.responsibility.org/get-the-facts/state-map/) and the US Census. It consists only of data for the year 2015. That is all that was available from the FAAR web site, as far as I know.
Final estimates of casualties in accidents involving at least one driver or rider over the drink-drive limit in Great Britain for 2020 show that:
Alongside these statistics, we have updated the feasibility study on drug-driving fatalities to add data for 2019 and provide details of those with levels of drugs over the legal limits.
We have also provided response to feedback received relating to changes to drink-drive statistics including changes to tables published as part of these statistics. In future, provisional drink-drive statistics will no longer be produced and the next update will be statistics for 2021 scheduled for publication in July 2023. We thank all those who took the time to provide feedback on the proposed changes.
Road safety statistics
Email mailto:roadacc.stats@dft.gov.uk">roadacc.stats@dft.gov.uk
Data Source: California Office of Traffic Safety
This data biography shares the how, who, what, where, when, and why about this dataset. We, the epidemiology team at Napa County Health and Human Services Agency, Public Health Division, created it to help you understand where the data we analyze and share comes from. If you have any further questions, we can be reached at epidemiology@countyofnapa.org.
Data dashboard featuring this data: https://data.countyofnapa.org/stories/s/abqu-wcty
Why was the data collected? California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) ranking metric is a tool used to compare similarly sized cities on traffic safety statistics. A smaller the assigned number means that the city is ranked higher, and a higher ranking means the city has worse traffic safety compared to similar locations.
How was the data collected? Crash data comes from Statewide Traffic Records System (SWITRS). This system collects and processes data gathered from a collision scene. Population estimates come from California Department of Finance (DoF), which are based on changes in births, deaths, domestic migration, and international migration. Estimates are developed using aggregate data from a variety of sources, including birth and death counts provided by the Department of Public Health, driver's license data from the Department of Motor Vehicles, housing unit data from local governments, school enrollment data from the Department of Education, and federal income tax return data from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (DVMT) come from California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The Traffic Data Branch at Caltrans estimates the number of vehicle miles that motorists traveled on California State Highways using a sampling of up to 20 traffic monitoring sites and reports on that data. Crash rankings are based on a ranking method that assigns statistical weights to categories including observed crash counts, population, and vehicle miles traveled. Counties are assigned statewide rankings, while cities are assigned population group rankings. DUI arrests data comes from the Department of Justice.
Who was included and excluded from the data & Where was the data collected? Data for the rankings is taken from Incorporated cities only. This includes local streets and state highways within city limits that share jurisdiction with the CHP. DUI arrest data is only available for cities that report it to the Department of Justice. Data from the OTS crash was sources specifically for Napa County, the City of Napa, American Canyon, Calistoga, St. Helena and Yountville.
When was the data collected? 2017-2022
Where can I learn more about this data? Office of traffic safety: https://www.ots.ca.gov/media-and-research/crash-rankings/ Methodology: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/24410
Motor-vehicle deaths in the United States have decreased greatly since the 1970s and 1980s. In 2023, there were around **** deaths from motor vehicles per 100,000 population, compared to a rate of **** deaths per 100,000 in 1970. Laws requiring drivers and passengers to wear safety belts and advancements in safety technology in vehicles are major drivers for these reductions. Motor-vehicle accidents in the U.S. Americans spend a significant amount of time behind the wheel. Many cities lack convenient and reliable public transportation and, especially in rural areas, cars are a necessary means of transportation. In 2020, August was the month with the highest number of fatal crashes, followed by September and June. The deadliest time of day for fatal vehicle crashes is between * and * p.m., most likely due to the after-work rush hour and more people who are under the influence of alcohol. Drinking and driving among youth Drinking and driving remains a relevant problem across the United States and can be especially problematic among younger people. In 2023, around *** percent of those aged 21 to 25 years in the United States reported driving under the influence of alcohol in the preceding year. Furthermore, around ***** percent of those aged 16 to 20 drove after drinking within the past year.
This dataset contains incident reports recorded by the Norfolk Police Department that occurred over the last five years. Incidents can be searched by type, location, date and time of occurrence. This dataset is updated daily.
In 2024, the least accidents caused by Poles driving under the influence of alcohol occurred in January, with a total of ** road accidents. On the other hand, the ************* recorded the highest number of road accidents caused by drunk drivers that year.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset contains Crime and Safety data from the Cary Police Department.
This data is extracted by the Town of Cary's Police Department's RMS application. The police incidents will provide data on the Part I crimes of arson, motor vehicle thefts, larcenies, burglaries, aggravated assaults, robberies and homicides. Sexual assaults and crimes involving juveniles will not appear to help protect the identities of victims.
This dataset includes criminal offenses in the Town of Cary for the previous 10 calendar years plus the current year. The data is based on the National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) which includes all victims of person crimes and all crimes within an incident. The data is dynamic, which allows for additions, deletions and/or modifications at any time, resulting in more accurate information in the database. Due to continuous data entry, the number of records in subsequent extractions are subject to change. Crime data is updated daily however, incidents may be up to three days old before they first appear.
About Crime Data
The Cary Police Department strives to make crime data as accurate as possible, but there is no avoiding the introduction of errors into this process, which relies on data furnished by many people and that cannot always be verified. Data on this site are updated daily, adding new incidents and updating existing data with information gathered through the investigative process.
This dynamic nature of crime data means that content provided here today will probably differ from content provided a week from now. Additional, content provided on this site may differ somewhat from crime statistics published elsewhere by other media outlets, even though they draw from the same database.
Withheld Data
In accordance with legal restrictions against identifying sexual assault and child abuse victims and juvenile perpetrators, victims, and witnesses of certain crimes, this site includes the following precautionary measures: (a) Addresses of sexual assaults are not included. (b) Child abuse cases, and other crimes which by their nature involve juveniles, or which the reports indicate involve juveniles as victims, suspects, or witnesses, are not reported at all.
Certain crimes that are under current investigation may be omitted from the results in avoid comprising the investigative process.
Incidents five days old or newer may not be included until the internal audit process has been completed.
This data is updated daily.
On average, between seven and ten percent of French people have been or nearly been involved in a car accident caused by excessive alcohol consumption between 2018 and 2023. Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs is identified as one of the main causes of fatal accidents by a significant share of French road users.
In 2020, there were nearly 15.6 thousand road accidents involving drink-driving drivers in Russia. This marked a decrease compared to the figure recorded in the previous year, when it was measured at approximately 15.8 thousand.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
In 2022, Texas was the state recording the highest volume of fatalities resulting from alcohol-impaired driving at ***** number of fatalities, followed by California, which reported around ***** fatalities from drunk driving. These two states alone, out of 51, account for nearly ********* of the total fatalities incurred by alcohol-impaired driving. The Golden state amounted to the largest share of motor vehicle registrations in the country in 2021.