8 datasets found
  1. Children living with grandparents in the U.S. 2023, by age of child

    • statista.com
    Updated Dec 9, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Children living with grandparents in the U.S. 2023, by age of child [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/769741/us-children-living-with-grandparents-by-age-of-child/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 9, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In the United States, about 2.71 million children lived in a household with their grandmother and grandfather. In 2023, 568,000 children under the age of three lived in a household where both a grandmother and grandfather were present.

  2. c

    Change and Development of Ways of Family Life - 2nd Wave (Survey of...

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • search.gesis.org
    • +2more
    Updated Mar 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Deutsches Jugendinstitut (DJI), München (2023). Change and Development of Ways of Family Life - 2nd Wave (Survey of Families) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.13197
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 14, 2023
    Authors
    Deutsches Jugendinstitut (DJI), München
    Time period covered
    Jul 1994 - Apr 1995
    Area covered
    Germany
    Measurement technique
    Oral survey with standardized questionnaire
    Description

    Current situation in life and ways of life. Social relations and courses of life. Topics: 1. Children: number of siblings; position in sibling sequence; sex of siblings; growing up with both parents or with single-parent; divorce or other reasons for separation of parents; social origins; educational goals; detailed information for every child on date of birth, sex, status, place of stay, school attendance, attendance at a kindergarten, vocational training and child care after school; desired number of children; living together with a partner; living separately; year of separation; right to support or personal obligation to pay; regularity of payments deposited. 2. Partner biography: steady partnership; detailed information for every partnership regarding: time of getting to know each other, start of actual partnership, start of living together in a residence, number of common children, age difference of partners, original marital status and school degree of partner, differences in nationality, date of marriage and continued existence of partner relation as well as point in time and manner of termination of the relation; difficulties in the partnership; thoughts of divorce; conversation with friends or partner as well as a lawyer about a possible divorce. 3. Questions on social net: person to confide in; persons with whom meals are regularly eaten and to whom emotional relations exist; persons from whom financial support is received or to whom it is given; leisure partner; sex, type of relation, distance to residence and frequency of contact with persons of one´s social surroundings; relation with friends and acquaintances (scale); number of living grandparents. 4. School, training and employment: year of starting school; year of school degree; time of first taking up an occupational activity and complete specification of professional career; current employment status; number of hours each week; temporary employment; work orientation (scale); raising children and employment; information on number of siblings, number of grandchildren, number of grandparents, employment, professional position and number of hours each week of spouse; division of tasks in the partnership; attitude to marriage (scale); estimated weekly effort for activities for family and household; attitude to children (scale); religiousness; postmaterialism; residential status; inheritance or purchase of real estate; gift received to acquire real estate; monthly rent or housing costs; floor space; number of rooms; number of children´s rooms; age at leaving parental home; length of residence; state of parental home; information on infrastructure available in one´s residential area and use of these facilities; presence and use of facilities for children in the immediate vicinity of one´s residence; members of household as recipients of government transfer payments such as earnings-related unemployment benefit, housing benefit or child benefit; household income; regular savings amount; annual construction savings amount; having debts and amount of debt; right to support for children; regularity of payments to child; utilization of social aid and counseling measures; looking after persons in need of care in household; family relation with these persons and weekly number of hours expended for this; support in care by social services or further persons; care activities besides housekeeping and employment; self-assessment of condition of health.

  3. g

    Wandel und Entwicklung familialer Lebensformen (Panel 1988-1994)

    • search.gesis.org
    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • +3more
    Updated Apr 13, 2010
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Deutsches Jugendinstitut (DJI), München (2010). Wandel und Entwicklung familialer Lebensformen (Panel 1988-1994) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.3209
    Explore at:
    application/x-stata-dta(4083185), application/x-spss-sav(4317628)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 13, 2010
    Dataset provided by
    GESIS Data Archive
    GESIS search
    Authors
    Deutsches Jugendinstitut (DJI), München
    License

    https://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-termshttps://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-terms

    Time period covered
    1988 - 1994
    Variables measured
    BIK -, FNR -, BULA -, GBIK -, GMOB -, BOUZO -, FNR94 -, GBULA -, BEZIRK -, EINW_KL -, and 701 more
    Description

    Current life situation and ways of life. Social relations and courses of life. Topics: 1. Children: number of siblings; position in sibling sequence; sex of siblings; growing up with both parents or with single-parent; divorce or other reasons for separation of parents; social origins; child-raising goals; desired number of children. 2. Partner biography: living together with a partner; living separately; year of separation; right to support; regularity of payments deposited; firm partnership; difficulties in partnership; thoughts of divorce; talks with friends or partner as well as a lawyer about a possible divorce. 3. Questions on social net: person to confide in; persons with whom one regularly has meals and to whom emotional relations exist; person from whom financial support is received or to whom provided; leisure partner; sex, type of relation, distance to residence and frequency of contact with persons of one's social surroundings; closeness and relation with other people and friends (scale); number of living grandparents. 4. School, training and employment: year of starting school; year of completion of school; time of first taking up occupational activity and complete information on professional career; current employment status; looking for work; hours worked each week; temporary work; work orientation (scale); most important criteria for choice of occupation (scale); child-raising and employment; information on number of siblings, number of grandchildren, number of grandparents, employment, occupational position and hours worked each week of spouse; division of tasks in the partnership and distribution of decision-making power; attitude to marriage (scale); characterization of partner relation (scale); estimated weekly effort for activities for family and household; attitude to children (scale); religiousness; postmaterialism; residential status; inheritance or purchase of real estate; gift received to purchase real estate; monthly rent or housing costs; floor space; number of rooms; number of children's rooms; age at leaving parental home; duration of residence; state of parental home; information on infrastructure available in one's residential area and use of these facilities; presence and use of facilities for children in the immediate vicinity of one's residence; members of the household as recipients of governmental transfer payments such as unemployment benefit, housing benefit or child benefit; household income; regular savings amount; annual construction savings amount; having debt and amount; right to support for children; regularity of payments for the child; utilization of social aid and counseling measures; looking after persons in need of care in the household; family relation with these persons and number of hours expended weekly for this; support in the care from social services or further persons; care activities along with housekeeping and employment; self-assessment of condition of health; frequency of leisure activities; desire for children. Demography: sex; multi-generation family; family cycle; household size; composition of household; employment situation of man and woman; steady partnership and living together with a partner; second residence; number of hours each week; working time arrangement; flex-time; work according to instructions or independently; income sources; household net income; expenditure areas in which soonest restrictions would be possible; family events that have occurred and problems and intensity of stress perceived from them; use of means of contraception; reasons for non-use; person deciding about use of means of contraception; year of birth; month of birth; district code; state.

  4. d

    Change and Development of Ways of Family Life in Bavaria (Survey of...

    • da-ra.de
    Updated 1994
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Deutsches Jugendinstitut (DJI), München (1994). Change and Development of Ways of Family Life in Bavaria (Survey of Families) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.2393
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    1994
    Dataset provided by
    GESIS Data Archive
    da|ra
    Authors
    Deutsches Jugendinstitut (DJI), München
    Time period covered
    Apr 1989
    Area covered
    Bavaria
    Description

    Sample of women between the ages of 18 to 55 years

  5. d

    Change and Development of Ways of Family Life (Cumulated File 1988-1995) -...

    • b2find.dkrz.de
    Updated May 6, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2023). Change and Development of Ways of Family Life (Cumulated File 1988-1995) - Dataset - B2FIND [Dataset]. https://b2find.dkrz.de/dataset/0e4c4dc9-9102-5e43-b23e-abdc748414dc
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 6, 2023
    Description

    Current life situation and ways of life. Social relations and courses of life. Topics: 1. Children: number of siblings; sex of siblings; growing up with both parents or single-parent; divorce or other reasons for separation of parents; social origins; child-raising goals; number of children; desired number of children; living together with a partner; living separately; year of separation; right to support or personal payment obligations; regularity of payments deposited. 2. Partnership: steady partnership; judgement on living together with partner and quality of partnership (scale); division of decision-making authority in partnership. 3. Questions on social net: person to confide in; persons with whom one regularly has meals and to whom emotional relations exist; persons from whom one receives financial support or whom one supports; leisure partner; number of living grandparents. 4. School, training and employment: year and month of birth; year of school completion; time of first taking up occupational activity and complete information on professional career; current employment status; number of hours each week; temporary work; work orientation (scale); child-raising and employment; information on number of siblings, number of grandchildren, number of grandparents, employment, occupational position and number of hours each week of spouse; division of tasks in partnership; attitude to marriage (scale); estimated weekly effort for activities for family and household; attitude to children (scale); religious denomination; religiousness; postmaterialism; residential status; monthly rent or housing costs; floor space; number of rooms; number of children's rooms; information on infrastructure available in one's residential area and use of these facilities; presence and use of facilities for children in the immediate vicinity of one's residence; household income; income sources; possession of assets; right to support for children; regularity of payments; arrangement for child care; looking after persons in need of care in the household; self-assessment of condition of health; problems occurring in daily life in the family and occupation and perceived stress from this (scale); contraception; person using and deciding about contraception; marriage duration, number of relatives; household size; perceived family; occupational situation of man and woman. Additionally there are various indices in the dataset: family cycle; family form; forms of child-raising; marriage; children as burden, as benefit; postmaterialism; partnership after Featherman; infrastructure; distance to various relatives; income per person. Also encoded was: state and district code. Aktuelle Lebenssituation und Lebensformen. Soziale Beziehungen und Lebensverläufe. Themen: 1. Kinder: Geschwisterzahl; Geschlecht der Geschwister; Aufwachsen bei beiden Elternteilen oder bei alleinerziehenden Elternteilen; Scheidung oder andere Gründe für die Trennung der Eltern; soziale Herkunft; Erziehungsziele; Kinderzahl; gewünschte Kinderzahl; Zusammenleben mit einem Partner; getrenntlebend; Jahr der Trennung; Anspruch auf Unterhaltsgeld oder eigene Zahlungsverpflichtungen; Regelmäßigkeit der eingehenden Zahlungen. 2. Partnerschaft: Feste Partnerschaft; Beurteilung des Zusammenlebens mit dem Partner und der Qualität der Partnerschaft (Skala); Aufteilung der Entscheidungsbefugnisse in der Partnerschaft. 3. Fragen zum sozialen Netz: Vertrauensperson; Personen, mit denen regelmäßig Mahlzeiten eingenommen werden und zu denen gefühlsmäßige Beziehungen bestehen; Personen, von denen eine finanzielle Unterstützung erhalten bzw. an die eine solche gegeben wird; Freizeitpartner; Anzahl der lebenden Großeltern. 4. Schule, Ausbildung und Erwerbstätigkeit: Geburtsjahr und Geburtsmonat; Jahr des Schulabschlusses; Zeitpunkt der ersten Aufnahme einer beruflichen Tätigkeit und lückenlose Angabe der beruflichen Karriere; derzeitiger Erwerbsstatus; Wochenstundenzahl; befristetes Arbeitsverhältnis; Arbeitsorientierung (Skala); Kindererziehung und Berufstätigkeit; Angaben über die Geschwisterzahl, Enkelzahl, Großelternzahl, Erwerbstätigkeit, berufliche Position und Wochenstundenzahl des Ehepartners; Aufgabenteilung in der Partnerschaft; Einstellung zur Ehe (Skala); geschätzter wöchentlicher Aufwand für Familien- und Haushaltstätigkeiten; Einstellung zu Kindern (Skala); Konfession; Religiosität; Postmaterialismus; Wohnstatus; monatliche Miet- bzw. Wohnungskosten; Wohnfläche; Zimmerzahl; Anzahl der Kinderzimmer; Angaben über die Infrastrukturversorgung der Wohngegend und Nutzung dieser Einrichtungen; Vorhandensein und Nutzung von Einrichtungen für Kinder in der näheren Umgebung der Wohnung; Haushaltseinkommen; Einkommensquellen; Vermögensbesitz; Unterhaltsansprüche für Kinder; Regelmäßigkeit des Zahlungseingangs; Kinderbetreuungsregelung; Betreuung pflegebedürftiger Personen im Haushalt; Selbsteinschätzung des Gesundheitszustands; aufgetretene Probleme im familiären und beruflichen Alltag und dadurch empfundene Belastung (Skala); Verhütung; Anwender und Entscheider über die Verhütung; Ehedauer, Anzahl der Verwandten; Haushaltsgröße; wahrgenommene Familie; Berufssituation von Mann und Frau. Zusätzlich im Datensatz sind verschiedene Indizes: Familienzyklus; Familienform; Erziehungsformen; Ehe; Kinder als Last, als Nutzen; Postmaterialismus; Partnerschaft nach Featherman; Infrastruktur; Entfernung zu verschiedenen Verwandten; Pro-Kopf-Einkommen. Zusätzlich verkodet wurden: Bundesland und Kreiskennziffer. Five different surveys with different samples. The details are noted with the individual studies. See the references under further remarks. Fünf verschiedene Erhebungen mit unterschiedlichen Stichproben. Die Details sind bei den Einzelstudien vermerkt. Siehe die Verweise unter weitere Hinweise.

  6. g

    Familie und Partnerbeziehungen in Ostdeutschland (Familiensurvey)

    • search.gesis.org
    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 4, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Deutsches Jugendinstitut (DJI), München (2018). Familie und Partnerbeziehungen in Ostdeutschland (Familiensurvey) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.13196
    Explore at:
    (401235), (436670)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 4, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    GESIS search
    GESIS Data Archive
    Authors
    Deutsches Jugendinstitut (DJI), München
    License

    https://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-termshttps://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-terms

    Variables measured
    BIK -, FNR -, BULA -, AZ_NR -, FNRAZ -, KI_NR -, BER_NR -, UNT_NR -, AUSB_NR -, FNR_BER -, and 432 more
    Description

    Family ways of life in the new states. Situation in life, occupation and partner biography up to now, moral orientations as well as attitude to children. Topics: Number of siblings; growing up with parents; divorce as reason for separation of parents; social origins; preference for a baby year with subsequent nursery care or extension of the baby year to three years; extension of the baby year or job guarantee; attitude to the role of women between raising children and employment (scale); importance of educational goals (scale); desire for children; living together with spouse; separation year; firm partnership; living together with a partner. Partner biography: detailed information on first to fourth or last partner relation; year of meeting and start of partnership; living together with partner in common residence; year of moving together; common children; positive or negative age difference with partner; marital status of partner at start of relation; social origins of partner; same religious denomination of partners; marriage and year of marriage; stability of partner relation or year of termination; year of death or year of separation or divorce; year of giving up common residence; reference persons or conversation partners for personal things; meal partners; person with whom one has a very close instinctive tie; providing financial support to others or receipt of such support; leisure partner; co-residents in main place of residence and as appropriate at a secondary residence; age, sex, degree of relation, frequency of contact and distance to these persons; number of living brothers, sisters, grandchildren and grandparents; year of birth and month of birth of respondent; detailed information on education and occupational training; conclusion of education and time of taking up first employment; career course; year of discontinuation of employment; time worked each week at the start of occupational life; time of changes of time worked each week; start, end, length and reasons for interruptions of employment; search for work; work on weekends and shift work; working according to instructions or working independently; limited employment; most important criteria in choice of occupation (scale); opinion on employment of women; division of child care as well as housework between the two partners (scale); decision-maker with selected purchase decisions as well as in family matters; significance of marriage for the partner and children (scale); number of hours each week for raising children and housework; attitude to children (scale); religiousness; postmaterialism; frequency of selected leisure activities; residential status; year of construction and condition of building; characterization of residential furnishings; total costs for residence; living space; number of rooms; number of children´s room; description of infrastructure of residential area and presence of kindergarten, nursery, playground etc.; information on all sources of income; most important source of income; official right of a child to support payments; regularity of payments deposited; personal stress from particular events in the last year, such as e.g. death, family problems, legal disputes, problems with authorities, unemployment and partner problems; looking after persons in need of care; family relation and weekly time expended for the care; self-classification of condition of health. The following information on spouse/partner of respondent: number of living brothers, sisters, grandchildren and grandparents; occupational position; time worked each week; arrangement of working hours on working days and weekends as well as shift work; search for employment. The following form was filled out by the respondent in writing: characterization of partner relation (scale); user and use of contraceptives; reasons for use of contraceptives. With families with children the following additional detailed information was recorded on all children: date of birth, sex, legal status; time period of living together with family; school attendance; education and institutions or persons looking after the children; desired number of children.

  7. Journal of Family and Economic Issues_Parenting Challenges in Urban...

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated Aug 6, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sainan Zhou (2024). Journal of Family and Economic Issues_Parenting Challenges in Urban China..csv [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26502226.v1
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Sainan Zhou
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Urban Parents’ Parenting Challenges Survey Data Dataset Name: Urban Parents’ Parenting Challenges Survey Data Abstract: This dataset contains survey data on the challenges faced by urban parents in China in raising children aged 2-6 years. The data aims to understand the primary challenges faced by parents, the demographic factors affecting these challenges, and the strategies parents typically use to seek support. Data Collection Method: The data was collected via an online survey conducted from July 2023 to December 2023. Data Structure: File Format: CSV Rows: Each row represents the response of a single participant. Columns: Includes variables such as respondent ID, grade, gender, birth order, parental ages, socioeconomic status (SES), and 16 parenting challenge scores. Variable Descriptions: id: Unique identifier for each respondent. Birth Order: 1 for first-born, 2 for not first-born. Child’s Gender: Gender of the child. Kindergarten Grade: 3 for lower grade, 4 for middle grade, 5 for upper grade. Grandparent Involvement: Indicates whether grandparents are involved in childcare, 1 for involved, 0 for not involved. Maternal Age, Paternal Age: 1 for

  8. c

    Life Story Interviews with Adopted Adults Who Are Now Parents and Adoptive...

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    Updated Mar 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neil, E (2025). Life Story Interviews with Adopted Adults Who Are Now Parents and Adoptive Parents Who Are Now Grandparents, 2018-2020 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-855382
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 23, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    University of East Anglia
    Authors
    Neil, E
    Time period covered
    Jun 1, 2018 - Nov 30, 2020
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Variables measured
    Individual, Family
    Measurement technique
    Participants were recruited using a range of methods. Adoption UK, an adoptive parent membership organisation, sent out mailings to their members about the study. The Post Adoption Centre, who work with all parties affected by adoption, also sent out mailings. Recruitment was also via snowball sampling, including via the professional contacts of the research team and through participants telling other members of their family about the study. The study was publicised on social media (Facebook and Twitter). Thus this was a convenience sample, and may have reached primarily families in touch with adoption organisations, or following adoption -related people or content on social media. Primarily recruitment was focused on people who were adopted or who adopted a child from 1989 onwards, this coinciding with a period of policy promoting the adoption of children from the care system in England and Wales. We aimed to recruit primarily people adopted through the child protection system, but without excluding other forms of adoption such as “relinquished” infants, and overseas adoptions (hence reflecting how adoption has mainly been used since 1989 in England and Wales). Study design, and recruitment were informed through consultation with four stakeholder groups: adopted adults who are parents; adoptive parents who are grandparents; professionals working in adoption; academic advisory group. A quota sampling method was used to ensure that the study recruited a diverse range of individuals as our aim was to hear about a wide range of possible experiences. The first consideration was gender-we recruited roughly equal numbers of men and women. It proved harder to recruit adopted men who were fathers to the study, and in order to recruit 20 adopted men, the research team needed to be flexible in terms of when the father was adopted. This resulted in the sample of adopted fathers generally being older than the mothers, adopted in the more distant past, and more likely to be adopted as “relinquished” infants compared to the mothers (reflecting the historical period in which they were adopted). The adopted fathers therefore had a higher mean age at interview, but a lower mean age at adoption compared to the adopted mothers. Because we were aiming to hear from individuals with a wide range of experiences of adoption, other characteristics that we deliberately set out to ensure were included in the adopted parents and adoptive grandparents sample were: adoptions over the age of five; adoption of sibling groups; transracial adoptions; adoption by single parents or foster parents; adopted adults and adoptive parents who had become estranged from each other; adopted parents who were not living with their children (for example because the child was in care, adopted, or living with another parent or relative); people from ethnic minority groups, adoptions where there had been ongoing birth family contact; adopted adults who became parents as teenagers. In discussion with stakeholder groups, quotas were set for the minimum number of people in the above categories to be included in the sample. Towards the end of data collection this meant that we needed to turn some participants away in order to reserve places in the study for people with particular characteristics.Participants were interviewed using an adapted version of McAdams life story interview method. This asks the person to describe their life now, before telling the story of their life in chapters, including being adopted (or adopting) and becoming a parent (or grandparent). A series of questions about 'key scenes' in their life follow, such as high points, low points, turning points and key challenges. Final questions are specific to this study and focus on family dynamics including birth family relationships and support services. Some participants were from the same family e.g. adoptive mother, adoptive father and adopted daughter in one family may have all been interviewed. Information about which cases are linked is provided as there are extra ethical issues involved in analysing at the family level. Where people from the same family took part, they were always interviewed separately. Almost all interviews were carried out face-to-face,a small number took place during the pandemic in 2020, and these were carried out using video calling. Interviews ranged in length from 1 hour to 5 hours, grandparent interviews tending to be longer. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and anonymised.Ethical approval for the study was granted by the University of East Anglia School of Social Work Research ethics committee.
    Description

    These data were collected as part of an ESRC study exploring the experiences of adopted adults who were now parents, and adoptive parents who had become grandparents. The aim was to better understand the long term impact of adoption on adopted people and adoptive parents, including the arrival of the next generation (children of adopted people). Parents and grandparents were interviewed using a 'life story' interview method (adapted from the work of Dan McAdams) where participants gave an account of their whole life, including adoption and becoming a parent/grandparent. This method generated very rich data about how people viewed their whole life and the role of adoption in their life, with interviews lasting from 1-5 hours. The archive consists of the anonymised transcripts of in-depth interviews with the two groups of participants: (1) 38 people who were adopted as children and who have now become parents (20 mothers and 18 fathers, age range 21-54 years, mean = 33. Age at adoption varied from 0-12, with 60% being adopted over age 1 - median 1.5 years, mean 3.2 years). (2) 43 adoptive parents who are now grandparents through their adopted child/ren (23 grandmothers and 20 grandfathers, age range 47-75 years). This is almost the full dataset from the project - only 2 fathers withheld consent for their transcript to go in the archive. NB adopted adults are described as mothers or fathers; adoptive parents are described as grandmothers or grandfathers. Almost all participants were living in England and had adopted/been adopted in England. Small numbers were living in Scotland or Wales. Interviews took place in 2019-2020. Also archived is data about the demographics of the participants. About half the sample consisted of 'linked' cases - where more than one member of a family had taken part, and information is given about which interviews are linked to each other. Finally, study materials are archived (leaflets, information and debrief sheets, interview schedules, demographic data collection form, consent form).

    For 20 years UK policy has encouraged the adoption of children from care, and tens of thousands are now of an age where they could become a parent. This compulsory form of adoption is controversial at home and abroad and it is vital to fully research the lifespan effects - including what happens when adoptees become parents to the next generation. A child's birth is a key event in any family, bringing joys and challenges. This study will provide a new understanding of the lived experiences and needs of people adopted from care who are now parents, and of adoptive parents who are now grandparents. It will inform support to help adopted young people to prepare for parenthood, promote their resilience, and support them as parents. The majority of children adopted from care will have experienced early adversities such as loss, abuse and neglect. Adoption offers permanence in a new family, but even so about half of adopted young people are likely to have psychological problems which carry on into adulthood. Studies of vulnerable parents (e.g. care leavers) show they are at risk of early parenthood, parenting difficulties, even their own children going into care. But for some, having a child is a positive choice and a healing experience. This study will explore the positives and the challenges of becoming a parent from the perspective of people adopted from care. The concept of 'resilience' (healthy development after exposure to risk) is key and the risk and protective factors that can affect resilience in the context of parenting will be a central focus. This study will also shine a light on the lifelong identity issues for adopted people. For adoptees, building identity can be hampered by gaps in their known life history, feelings of being different or stigmatised, and a lack of connection with birth relatives. Becoming a parent can stir up identity concerns and trigger a search for birth family, but these issues are unexplored for people adopted from care, many of whom will have retained some form of contact with birth relatives. We will explore how adopted people make meaning of their whole life history, including being adopted and being a parent, adding to our understanding of narrative identity development for adoptees in adulthood. The research will also include the perspective of parents who adopted a child from care and who are now grandparents. Adoption has lifelong implications for adopters too, but there is no research on the grandparenting stage of family life in 'from care' adoptions. Because of the ongoing vulnerability of many young people adopted from care, it is important to include grandparents because they may be providing vital support to their child and grandchild. In-depth interview data from 40 adopted people who are now parents (20 men, 20 women), and 40 adoptive parents who are now grandparents will be collected and the sample will include a mixture of linked...

  9. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2024). Children living with grandparents in the U.S. 2023, by age of child [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/769741/us-children-living-with-grandparents-by-age-of-child/
Organization logo

Children living with grandparents in the U.S. 2023, by age of child

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Dec 9, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
2023
Area covered
United States
Description

In the United States, about 2.71 million children lived in a household with their grandmother and grandfather. In 2023, 568,000 children under the age of three lived in a household where both a grandmother and grandfather were present.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu