The price of NVIDIA shares traded on the Nasdaq stock exchange remained rather stable between July 2010 and January 2017. With the beginning of 2017, the price of NVIDIA shares started to increase, standing at 32.68 U.S. dollars per share in November 2021. Since then, the price of NVIDIA shares rose significantly and reached its highest value at 138.25 U.S. dollars as of the end of November 2024.

Nvidia stock price, live market quote, shares value, historical data, intraday chart, earnings per share and news.

Nvidia reported $11.33B in Stock for its fiscal quarter ending in April of 2025. Data for Nvidia | NVDA - Stock including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

Nvidia Saham - Nilai saat ini, data historis, perkiraan, statistik, grafik dan kalender ekonomi - Jun 2025.Data for Nvidia | Saham including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last June in 2025.

Nvidia reported $44.1B in Sales Revenues for its fiscal quarter ending in April of 2025. Data for Nvidia | NVDA - Sales Revenues including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

This dataset is about stocks. It has 5 rows and is filtered where the company is NVIDIA. It features 8 columns including stock name, company, exchange, and exchange symbol.

1. Overview

This dataset provides monthly stock price data for the MAG7 over the past 20 years (2004–2024). The data includes key financial metrics such as opening price, closing price, highest and lowest prices, trading volume, and percentage change. The dataset is valuable for financial analysis, stock trend forecasting, and portfolio optimization.

2. What is MAG7 ?

MAG7 refers to the seven largest and most influential technology companies in the U.S. stock market : - Microsoft (MSFT) - Apple (AAPL) - Google (Alphabet, GOOGL) - Amazon (AMZN) - Nvidia (NVDA) - Meta (META) - Tesla (TSLA)

These companies are known for their market dominance, technological innovation, and significant impact on global stock indices such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100.

3. Dataset Details

The dataset consists of historical monthly stock prices of MAG7, retrieved from Investing.com. It provides an overview of how these stocks have performed over two decades, reflecting market trends, economic cycles, and technological shifts.

4. Columns Descriptions

• Date The recorded month and year (DD-MM-YYYY)
• Price The closing price of the stock at the end of the month
• Open The price at which the stock opened at the beginning of the month
• High The highest stock price recorded in the month
• Low The lowest stock price recorded in the month
• Vol. The total trading volume for the month
• Change % The percentage change in stock price compared to the previous month # 5. Data Source & Format The dataset was obtained from Investing.com and downloaded in CSV format. The data has been processed to ensure consistency and accuracy, with date formats standardized for time-series analysis. # 6. Potential Use Cases This dataset can be used for :
• 📈 Stock price trend analysis over 20 years
• 📊 Building financial models for long-term investing
• 🔎 Machine learning applications in stock market prediction
• 📉 Evaluating market volatility and economic impact on MAG7 stocks

7. Limitations & Considerations

• ⚠️ The dataset is limited to monthly data, meaning short-term price fluctuations are not captured.
• ⚠️ Trading volume (Vol.) may vary in availability due to differences in reporting.
• ⚠️ External factors such as stock splits, dividends, and market crashes are not explicitly noted but may impact historical trends.

Nvidia reported 24.4B in Outstanding Shares in February of 2025. Data for Nvidia | NVDA - Outstanding Shares including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

Iraq Internet Usage: Device Vendor Market Share: Tablet: Nvidia data was reported at 0.000 % in 04 Apr 2024. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 % for 03 Apr 2024. Iraq Internet Usage: Device Vendor Market Share: Tablet: Nvidia data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 % from Mar 2024 (Median) to 04 Apr 2024, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.100 % in 31 Mar 2024 and a record low of 0.000 % in 04 Apr 2024. Iraq Internet Usage: Device Vendor Market Share: Tablet: Nvidia data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statcounter Global Stats. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Iraq – Table IQ.SC.IU: Internet Usage: Device Vendor Market Share.

Nvidia reported $3.74T in Market Capitalization this July of 2025, considering the latest stock price and the number of outstanding shares.Data for Nvidia | NVDA - Market Capitalization including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

Super Micro Computer revises revenue forecasts amid economic uncertainty, impacting stock performance and highlighting market challenges.

The Trump administration is poised to reverse Biden-era AI chip restrictions, aiming to enhance American innovation and secure AI dominance, impacting global semiconductor trade and relations with countries like China and the UAE.

Nvidia reported 47.4 in PE Price to Earnings for its fiscal quarter ending in April of 2025. Data for Nvidia | NVDA - PE Price to Earnings including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

Nvidia reported $80.13B in Current Assets for its fiscal quarter ending in January of 2025. Data for Nvidia | NVDA - Current Assets including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

With a market capitalization of 3.12 trillion U.S. dollars as of May 2024, Microsoft was the world’s largest company that year. Rounding out the top five were some of the world’s most recognizable brands: Apple, NVIDIA, Google’s parent company Alphabet, and Amazon. Saudi Aramco led the ranking of the world's most profitable companies in 2023, with a pre-tax income of nearly 250 billion U.S. dollars. How are market value and market capitalization determined? Market value and market capitalization are two terms frequently used – and confused - when discussing the profitability and viability of companies. Strictly speaking, market capitalization (or market cap) is the worth of a company based on the total value of all their shares; an important metric when determining the comparative value of companies for trading opportunities. Accordingly, many stock exchanges such as the New York or London Stock Exchange release market capitalization data on their listed companies. On the other hand, market value technically refers to what a company is worth in a much broader context. It is determined by multiple factors, including profitability, corporate debt, and the market environment as a whole. In this sense it aims to estimate the overall value of a company, with share price only being one element. Market value is therefore useful for determining whether a company’s shares are over- or undervalued, and in arriving at a price if the company is to be sold. Such valuations are generally made on a case-by-case basis though, and not regularly reported. For this reason, market capitalization is often reported as market value. What are the top companies in the world? The answer to this question depends on the metric used. Although the largest company by market capitalization, Microsoft's global revenue did not manage to crack the top 20 companies. Rather, American multinational retailer Walmart was ranked as the largest company in the world by revenue. Walmart also had the highest number of employees in the world.

The NVIDIA 40 Series graphics card market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand for high-performance computing across gaming, professional workstations, and data centers. The market, encompassing cards like the RTX 4060, RTX 4060 Ti, RTX 4070, RTX 4070 Ti, RTX 4080, and RTX 4090, along with other mobile variants, is projected to reach a value of $15 billion in 2025. This substantial market size reflects the widespread adoption of these cards in both online and offline sales channels. While precise historical data is unavailable, industry analysis suggests a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 25% from 2019 to 2025. This growth is fueled by advancements in ray tracing technology, AI-powered features, and increased resolutions demanded by modern games. Key players like NVIDIA, ASUS, MSI, Gigabyte, and others are aggressively competing to capture market share through innovative designs, improved cooling solutions, and aggressive marketing. However, market restraints include fluctuating component prices, supply chain disruptions, and the potential for economic downturns affecting consumer spending. The market segmentation clearly shows a high demand for the higher-end cards, with the RTX 4080 and 4090 likely holding significant market share due to their superior performance. The forecast period (2025-2033) is anticipated to witness continued growth, though at a slightly moderated CAGR of around 18%. This moderation might be attributed to market saturation at the high end and a shift towards more affordable options in the mid-range. Regional variations are expected, with North America and Asia-Pacific leading the market due to higher adoption rates of advanced technology and gaming culture. The continued development of virtual reality, artificial intelligence, and high-resolution gaming will continue to drive the demand for high-performance graphics cards, ensuring the continued success of the NVIDIA 40 Series and similar future iterations. Competitive landscape analysis reveals a strong presence of established brands leveraging their expertise in manufacturing and distribution networks.

AI stocks are gaining attention on Wall Street as easing U.S.-China tensions and positive economic indicators drive investor interest, despite increased speculation and short-selling activities.

Nvidia reported $0.96 in EPS Earnings Per Share for its fiscal quarter ending in April of 2025. Data for Nvidia | NVDA - EPS Earnings Per Share including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

Nvidia reported $25.22B in Pre-Tax Profit for its fiscal quarter ending in January of 2025. Data for Nvidia | NVDA - Pre Tax Profit including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

KFS was written up by fiverocks in May 2020 and has been a home run - up over 5x since his write up at $1.75 per share and exceeding the price target on his initial thesis, which has largely played out.

The company has:

Re-started investor outreach (IR page now revamped, investor days/earnings calls being held) after years of zero outbound IR. (The company was also dark on its financial statements at the time of previous write up).

Sold down several non-strategic real estate assets and re-allocated the funds to purchasing operating companies (both extended warranty and as part of search accelerator program).

Simplified its balance sheet, with debt coming down massively as large amounts were associated with the non-core real estate assets, while the company also bought back the majority of its Trups preferred debt at discount to face value.

Unfortunately, I haven't partaken in most of the investment gains to date, only buying shares late last year. However thanks to the author's yeoman's work in the comments section, I noticed he was continually raising his price target, as the initial thesis was playing out and a new one was emerging.

• Portfolio Optimization
• Efficient Frontier Calculator
• Asset Correlations
• Backtest Portfolio
• Portfolio Visualizer
• Online Monte Carlo Simulation

One of my favourite signals for further investigating an idea on VIC, is when the author of an idea continues to pound the table on an idea that has already multi-bagged, given they have every incentive to hit that author exit recommendation button and take the W. It worked out well for me on XPEL, HMHC and HQI, where I either didn't take a position on initial recommendation (or took a very small position), but still managed to make some money, thanks to the respective author's subsequent cheerleading, as the thesis played out and evolved.

Thanks to fiverock's cheerleading on KFS, its clear after looking into the company that there is still plenty of meat left on the bone, as the thesis evolves from the complex to the simple thesis outlined by management, towards a potential compounding machine at a very reasonable starting valuation, as the company continues to build out its search accelerator business.

Summary of current business

KFS's much simplified business now consists of two operating segments - 1) the Extended Warranty Business (68% ebitda) and 2) Search Accelerator (32% ebitda). I'll cover the extended warranty briefly, but its search accelerator business that really has the potential to make the stock a multi-bagger from here.

Extended Warranty business:

Kingsway's Extended warranty business operates under four different companies - three targeting the automotive sector (87% ebitda - IWS, PWI and Penn) and one targeting mechanical (13% of ebitda - Trinity).

KFS likes the extended warranty business, due to its lack of capital intensity + the sticky nature of relationships with customers (for example, the automotive extended warranties are mostly sold by credit union/dealer partners with credit union in particular exhibiting little churn). Furthermore, the nature of claims are fairly predictable, typically relating to mechanical failure (eg, transmission issues), with high quality data and little tail risk, resulting in predictable and recurring revenues.

Whilst KFS has in the recent past been able to acquire extended warranty businesses at attractive valuations, they see current valuations as probably too high to contemplate acquisitions here in near future and will be focusing on organic growth.

Search Accelerator:

KFS's search accelerator business 'officially' commenced as a separate operating segment with the purchase of the Ravix business (accounting/HR outsourcing) in 2021, under Timi Okah, their first operator-in-residence. KFS CEO JT Fitzgerald is quite experienced with the search fund model, having been a post-MBA search fund CEO himself, while also being an active investor in the space . Since the acquisition of Ravix, KFS has also purchased CSuite (financial executive search) and SNS (nurse staffing). There are also 4.5 operators-in-residence (OIRs) that are currently searching for businesses to acquire (the 0.5 being Charles Joyce, who is working on initiatives to improve search efficiency and OIR recruitment at holdco level, but is also interested in acquiring a business at some point).

Before describing the current state of affairs for KFS's search accelerator business, I think its worthwhile to give a brief history of the search fund model, its history of lucrative returns and why I believe KFS's search accelerator is well-positioned to perform well.

Search Funds (also knows as 'Entrepreneurs through acquisition' or ETA) are typically set up by freshly minted, high potential MBAs who have the ambition of running their own company, but are lacking in both financial resources and experience. Typically at least some of the search fund principals will have experience in both search funds and/or running a business and in addition to investing are also there to provide mentorship and guidance to the searcher. Whilst the asset class has grown rapidly since the early 80s, professional search investors are still a relatively small group and mostly know each other.

In terms of size, KFS is looking to purchase businesses with ebitda between $1.5mn-$3mn- at the sweet spot of being too small for a mid-market PE fund, whilst also being out of reach for majority of ex-HNWI individuals. In terms of types of business they are looking to acquire, KFS (and search funds in general) look to acquire businesses with predictable, recurring revenues and low operational complexity (given they will be managed by rookie CEOs).

Searchers are typically looking to purchase businesses from owners approaching retirement age, who are looking for both exit liquidity and succession planning (JT has used the phrase 'succession capital' to describe the solution that searchers like KFS are providing to retiring entrepreneurs.) Deals can be sourced in multiple ways including business brokers, cold approaching and purchase of databases. Its typically a very time consuming process, with several rocks needing to be turned over, and can take take anywhere up to two years.

In terms of deal economics, at KFS the OIRs are given a very modest salary and resources to initiate their search (at more traditional search funds, the searchers have to raise a fund to cover search costs, typically upto two years). On consummation of a deal, the searcher is given some equity in the business, with this amount increasing over time, and the amount typically linked to certain return goals. It's also typically structured in such a way that KFS's equity is preferred and they need to be made whole on their investment (+ modest single digit return), before the searcher participates in any upside. While the searcher CEO is paid a salary, it is usually fairly modest and given the typical talent level, well below their opportunity cost if they had entered the corporate world post-MBA, so the carried interest is really their main way of making bank and aligning the incentives between searcher and KFS. It makes more financial + reputational sense for a searcher/OIR to either end or extend their search than consummate a mediocre/bad deal.

Searchers typically look to create value in the business once acquired, either by pursuing additional revenue channels, cutting costs and/or investing in the business. Given that the previous owner is typically approaching retirement age, in several instances the company is a lifestyle business and not necessarily cost or revenue-optimised, so there is usually some low hanging fruit to improve profitability. Early signs at Ravix look promising (although its probably too soon to judge).

Stanford Business School releases a study every couple of years on the financial performance of search funds. The most recent study was 2022, which looked at the performance of 546 search funds in US and Canada between 1984 to 2021. In total, the aggregate pre-tax IRR and MOIC of all funds in the study was 35% and 5.2x, respectively, with this number including 1) search funds that failed to consummate an acquisition (34% of total funds) and 2) search funds that produced a loss (27% of funds that consummated an acquisition), so potential returns could be higher if these left tail outcomes can be mitigated (in the most recent investor day, JT discusses how he believes the KFS model can avoid some of the pitfalls associated with traditional search funds).

• Apple Stock Valuation
• Netflix Stock Valuation
• Microsoft Stock Valuation
• Meta Stock Valuation
• Tesla Stock Valuation
• Amazon Stock Valuation
• Citibank Stock Valuation
• Nvidia Stock Valuation
• <a