Population Numbers By New York City Neighborhood Tabulation Areas

The data was collected from Census Bureaus' Decennial data dissemination (SF1). Neighborhood Tabulation Areas (NTAs), are aggregations of census tracts that are subsets of New York City's 55 Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs). Primarily due to these constraints, NTA boundaries and their associated names may not definitively represent neighborhoods. This report shows change in population from 2000 to 2010 for each NTA. Compiled by the Population Division – New York City Department of City Planning.

These data were reported to the NYC DOHMH by March 31, 2021

This dataset includes data on new diagnoses of HIV and AIDS in NYC for the calendar years 2016 through 2020. Reported cases and case rates (per 100,000 population) are stratified by United Hospital Fund (UHF) neighborhood, age group, and race/ethnicity.

This dataset contains information on antibody testing for COVID-19: the number of people who received a test, the number of people with positive results, the percentage of people tested who tested positive, and the rate of testing per 100,000 people, stratified by ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) neighborhood poverty group. These data can also be accessed here: https://github.com/nychealth/coronavirus-data/blob/master/totals/antibody-by-poverty.csv Exposure to COVID-19 can be detected by measuring antibodies to the disease in a person’s blood, which can indicate that a person may have had an immune response to the virus. Antibodies are proteins produced by the body’s immune system that can be found in the blood. People can test positive for antibodies after they have been exposed, sometimes when they no longer test positive for the virus itself. It is important to note that the science around COVID-19 antibody tests is evolving rapidly and there is still much uncertainty about what individual antibody test results mean for a single person and what population-level antibody test results mean for understanding the epidemiology of COVID-19 at a population level. These data only provide information on people tested. People receiving an antibody test do not reflect all people in New York City; therefore, these data may not reflect antibody prevalence among all New Yorkers. Increasing instances of screening programs further impact the generalizability of these data, as screening programs influence who and how many people are tested over time. Examples of screening programs in NYC include: employers screening their workers (e.g., hospitals), and long-term care facilities screening their residents. In addition, there may be potential biases toward people receiving an antibody test who have a positive result because people who were previously ill are preferentially seeking testing, in addition to the testing of persons with higher exposure (e.g., health care workers, first responders.) Neighborhood-level poverty groups were classified in a manner consistent with Health Department practices to describe and monitor disparities in health in NYC. Neighborhood poverty measures are defined as the percentage of people earning below the Federal Poverty Threshold (FPT) within a ZCTA. The standard cut-points for defining categories of neighborhood-level poverty in NYC are: • Low: <10% of residents in ZCTA living below the FPT • Medium: 10% to <20% • High: 20% to <30% • Very high: ≥30% residents living below the FPT The ZCTAs used for classification reflect the first non-missing address within NYC for each person reported with an antibody test result. Rates were calculated using interpolated intercensal population estimates updated in 2019. These rates differ from previously reported rates based on the 2000 Census or previous versions of population estimates. The Health Department produced these population estimates based on estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau and NYC Department of City Planning. Rates for poverty were calculated using direct standardization for age at diagnosis and weighting by the US 2000 standard population. Antibody tests are categorized based on the date of specimen collection and are aggregated by full weeks starting each Sunday and ending on Saturday. For example, a person whose blood was collected for antibody testing on Wednesday, May 6 would be categorized as tested during the week ending May 9. A person tested twice in one week would only be counted once in that week. This dataset includes testing data beginning April 5, 2020. Data are updated daily, and the dataset preserves historical records and source data changes, so each extract date reflects the current copy of the data as of that date. For example, an extract date of 11/04/2020 and extract date of 11/03/2020 will both contain all records as they were as of that extract date. Without filtering or grouping by extract date, an analysis will almost certain

This file contains demographic, social, economic, and housing information from the "complete count" or "100-percent" data and sample data from the 1980 census for locally defined neighborhoods. The Neighborhood Publication Area (NPA) is the total area within which neighborhoods were defined by each participant in the Neighborhood Statistics Program (NSP), which was developed by the Census Bureau. Population items include age, race, sex, marital status, Spanish origin, household type, and household relationship. Housing items include occupancy/vacancy status, tenure, contract rent, value, condominium status, number of rooms, and plumbing facilities. Selected aggregates, means, and medians are also provided. Data are presented in 59 tables consisting of 321 cells.

This file contains demographic, social, economic, and housing information from the "100-percent" and unweighted sample counts from the 1980 census for locally defined neighborhoods. The Neighborhood Publication Area (NPA) is the total area within which neighborhoods were defined by each participant in the Neighborhood Statistics Program (NSP), which was developed by the Census Bureau. Population items include age, race, sex, marital status, Spanish origin, employment status, and language spoken at home. Housing items include occupancy/vacancy status, tenure, contract rent, value, condominium status, number of rooms, and plumbing facilities.

Summary results from NYC Community Health Survey 2010-2016: adults ages 18 years and older Source: NYC Community Health Survey (CHS) 2010-16. The Community Health Survey (CHS) includes self-reported data from adults, years 18 and older. CHS has included adults with landline phones since 2002 and, starting in 2009, also has included adults who can be reached by cell-phone. Starting in 2011, CHS weighting methods were updated to use Census 2010 and additional demographic characteristics (http://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/epi/epiresearch-chsmethods.pdf ).

Data are age-adjusted to the US 2000 Standard Population.
Data prepared by Bureau of Epidemiology Services, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

The New York City Community Health Survey (CHS) is a telephone survey conducted annually by the DOHMH, Division of Epidemiology, Bureau of Epidemiology Services. CHS provides robust data on the health of New Yorkers, including neighborhood, borough, and citywide estimates on a broad range of chronic diseases and behavioral risk factors. The data are analyzed and disseminated to influence health program decisions, and increase the understanding of the relationship between health behavior and health status. For more information see EpiQuery, https://a816-healthpsi.nyc.gov/epiquery/CHS/CHSXIndex.html

"TARGET POPULATION The target population of the CHS includes non-institutionalized adults aged 18 and older who live in a household with a landline telephone in New York City (the five borough area). Starting in 2009, adults living in households with only cell phones have also been included in the survey.

HEALTH TOPICS Most years the CHS includes approximately 125 questions, covering the following health topics: general health status and mental health, health care access, cardiovascular health, diabetes, asthma, immunizations, nutrition and physical activity, smoking, HIV, sexual behavior, alcohol consumption, cancer screening and other health topics. A core group of demographics variables are included every year to facilitate weighting and comparisons among different groups of New Yorkers.

SAMPLING The CHS uses a stratified random sample to produce neighborhood and citywide estimates. Neighborhoods are defined using the United Hospital Fund's (UHF) neighborhood designation, which assigns neighborhood based on the ZIP code of the respondent. New ZIP codes have been added since the UHF's were originally defined. There are 42 UHF neighborhoods in NYC. However, to avoid small sample sizes for CHS estimates, UHF estimates are generally collapsed into 34 UHFs/groups.

Starting in 2009, a second sample consisting of cell-only households with New York City exchanges was added. This design is non-overlapping because in the cell-only sample, adults living in households with landline telephones were screened out.

A computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) system is used to collect the survey data. The CHS sampling frame was constructed with a list of telephone numbers provided by a commercial vendor. Upon agreement to participate in the survey, one adult is randomly selected from the household to complete the interview.

Interviewing is conducted in a variety of languages. Every year, the questionnaire is translated from English into Spanish, Russian, and Chinese. Some years, live translation services are provided by Language Line (including Hindi, Arabic, Farsi, and Haitian Creole). Typically, data collection begins in March of the study year and ends in December. The average length of the survey is 25 minutes.

LIMITATIONS The survey sampling methodology does not capture the following groups: households without any telephone service and (prior to 2009) households that only have a cell phone. The CHS also excludes adults living in institutional group housing, such as college dormitories.

"

Context:

PLUTO is a master record of the locations and characteristics of buildings in New York City. It’s published by the New York City Department of City Planning on an approximately quarterly-to-half-yearly basis, and is one of the more important datasets for civic analysis in New York City.

Content:

PLUTO includes information on building height, square footage, location, type, landmark status, number of units, owner, year of construction, and other related fields.

Acknowledgements:

This dataset is published as-is by the New York City Department of Planning.

Inspiration:

• What is the distribution of the heights of buildings in New York City? The age?
• Can you define neighborhoods by clustering similar buildings within them?
• What (and where) is the split between commercial, residential, and office space in New York City?

This survey of minority groups was part of a larger project to investigate the patterns, predictors, and consequences of midlife development in the areas of physical health, psychological well-being, and social responsibility. Conducted in Chicago and New York City, the survey was designed to assess the well-being of middle-aged, urban, ethnic minority adults living in both hyper-segregated neighborhoods and in areas with lower concentrations of minorities. Respondents' views were sought on issues relevant to quality of life, including health, childhood and family background, religion, race and ethnicity, personal beliefs, work experiences, marital and close relationships, financial situation, children, community involvement, and neighborhood characteristics. Questions on health explored the respondents' physical and emotional well-being, past and future attitudes toward health, physical limitations, energy level and appetite, amount of time spent worrying about health, and physical reactions to those worries. Questions about childhood and family background elicited information on family structure, the role of the parents with regard to child rearing, parental education, employment status, and supervisory responsibilities at work, the family financial situation including experiences with the welfare system, relationships with siblings, and whether as a child the respondent slept in the same bed as a parent or adult relative. Questions on religion covered religious preference, whether it is good to explore different religious teachings, and the role of religion in daily decision-making. Questions about race and ethnicity investigated respondents' backgrounds and experiences as minorities, including whether respondents preferred to be with people of the same racial group, how important they thought it was to marry within one's racial or ethnic group, citizenship, reasons for moving to the United States and the challenges faced since their arrival, their native language, how they would rate the work ethic of certain ethnic groups, their views on race relations, and their experiences with discrimination. Questions on personal beliefs probed for respondents' satisfaction with life and confidence in their opinions. Respondents were asked whether they had control over changing their life or their personality, and what age they viewed as the ideal age. They also rated people in their late 20s in the areas of physical health, contribution to the welfare and well-being of others, marriage and close relationships, relationships with their children, work situation, and financial situation. Questions on work experiences covered respondents' employment status, employment history, future employment goals, number of hours worked weekly, number of nights away from home due to work, exposure to the risk of accident or injury, relationships with coworkers and supervisors, work-related stress, and experience with discrimination in the workplace. A series of questions was posed on marriage and close relationships, including marital status, quality and length of relationships, whether the respondent had control over his or her relationships, and spouse/partner's education, physical and mental health, employment status, and work schedule. Questions on finance explored respondents' financial situation, financial planning, household income, retirement plans, insurance coverage, and whether the household had enough money. Questions on children included the number of children in the household, quality of respondents' relationships with their children, prospects for their children's future, child care coverage, and whether respondents had changed their work schedules to accommodate a child's illness. Additional topics focused on children's identification with their culture, their relationships with friends of different backgrounds, and their experiences with racism. Community involvement was another area of investigation, with items on respondents' role in child-rearing, participation on a jury, voting behavior, involvement in charitable organizations, volunteer experiences, whether they made monetary or clothing donations, and experiences living in an institutional setting or being homeless. Respondents were also queried about their neighborhoods, with items on neighborhood problems including racism, vandalism, crime, drugs, poor schools, teenag

Condominiums and cooperatives are valued as if they were residential rental apartments. Income information from similar rental properties is applied to determine value. The Department of Finance (DOF) chooses similar properties to value condos and coops. Properties are selected based on a combination of factors such as: land location, income levels, building age and construction and exemptions and subsidies.

This project investigated the experiences of New York City youth ages 16-24 who were at high risk for gun violence (e.g., carried a gun, been shot or shot at). Youth participants were recruited from three neighborhoods with historically high rates of gun violence when compared to the city as a whole--Brownsville (Brooklyn), Morrisania (Bronx), and East Harlem (Manhattan). This study explores the complex confluence of individual, situational, and environmental factors that influence youth gun acquisition and use. This study is part of a broader effort to build an evidence-based foundation for individual and community interventions, and policies that will more effectively support these young people and prevent youth gun violence. Through interviews with 330 youth, this study seeks to answer these questions: What are the reasons young people carry guns? How do young people talk about having and using guns? What are young people's social networks like, and what roles do guns play in thesenetworks? Interviews covered the following topics: neighborhood perceptions; perceptions of and experiences with the police, gangs, guns, and violence; substance use; criminal history; and demographics: race, gender, age, legal status, relationship status, living situation, _location, number of children, drug use, and education.

We are also including a tabular version that’s slightly more comprehensive (would include anything that didn’t join to the parcel basefile due to lot alterations or resubdivisions since 2023 and/or due to parcels comprised of condos). This Excel file can be downloaded HERE, and does not contain the latitude and longitude information.Data Dictionary: Attribute Label Definition Source

TAX_ID Unique 26 character property tax identification number Onondaga County Planning

PRINTKEY Abbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot) Onondaga County Planning

ADDRESSNUM Property’s physical street address Onondaga County Planning

ADDRESSNAM Property’s physical street name Onondaga County Planning

LAT Latitude Onondaga County Planning

LONG Longitude Onondaga County Planning

TAX_ID_1 City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping) City of Syracuse - Assessment

SBL Property Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot) City of Syracuse - Assessment

PNUMBR Property Number (10 digit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment

StNum Parcel street number City of Syracuse - Assessment

StName Parcel street name City of Syracuse - Assessment

FullAddress Street number and street name City of Syracuse - Assessment

Zip Parcel zip code City of Syracuse - Assessment

desc_1 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

desc_2 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

desc_3 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

SHAPE_IND

City of Syracuse - Assessment

LUC_parcel New York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htm City of Syracuse - Assessment

LU_parcel New York State property type classification name City of Syracuse - Assessment

LUCat_Old Legacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc. NA

land_av Land assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment

total_av Full assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment

Owner Property owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix) City of Syracuse - Assessment

Add1_OwnPOBox Property owner mailing address (PO Box) City of Syracuse - Assessment

Add2_OwnStAdd Property owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction) City of Syracuse - Assessment

Add3_OwnUnitInfo Property owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment

Add4_OwnCityStateZip Property owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code) City of Syracuse - Assessment

FRONT Front footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feet City of Syracuse - Assessment

DEPTH Actual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet) City of Syracuse - Assessment

ACRES Number of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560) City of Syracuse - Assessment

yr_built Year built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.) City of Syracuse - Assessment

n_ResUnits Number of residential units NA - Calculated field

IPSVacant Is it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

IPS_Condition Property Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

NREligible National Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

LPSS Locally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

WTR_ACTIVE Water activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active) City of Syracuse - Water

RNI Is property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

DPW_Quad Geographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments. City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works

TNT_NAME TNT Sector property is located in City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

NHOOD City Neighborhood Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

NRSA Is property located in Neighborhood Revitilization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

DOCE_Area Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

ZONE_DIST_PREV Former zoning district code Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

REZONE ReZone designation (adopted June 2023) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

New_CC_DIST Current Common Council District property is located in Onondaga County Board of Elections

CTID_2020 Census Tract ID (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

CTLAB_2020 Census Tract Label (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

CT_2020 Census Tract (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

SpecNhood Is property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

InPD Is property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

PDNAME Preservation District name Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

ELECT_DIST Election district number Onondaga County Board of Elections

CITY_WARD City ward number Onondaga County Board of Elections

COUNTY_LEG Onondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections

NYS_ASSEMB New York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections

NYS_SENATE New York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections

US_CONGR United States Congressional District number Onondaga County Board of Elections

Dataset Contact InformationOrganization: Neighborhood & Business DevelopmentPosition:Data Program ManagerCity:Syracuse, NYE-Mail Address:opendata@syrgov.netPlease note there is a data quality issue in this iteration with the preservation district (“InPD,” “PDNAME”) and special neighborhood historic district (“SpecNhood”) fields erroneously showing null results for all parcels.