Oakland County's public-facing parcel viewer. Oakland County staff and CVTs can request free accounts by contacting the Oakland County Service Center (servicecenter@oakgov.com, 248-858-8812). More information about the products available in Property Gateway can be found here: https://www.oakgov.com/propertygateway/Pages/default.aspx.

Access Oakland Account Services provides secure account access and management for a variety of Oakland County Applications, including:

• Property Gateway: is a leading-edge Internet tool built to provide free and fee-based online access to Oakland County's land and property information including tax parcel reports and maps. If you are a business and wish to use Property Gateway on a regular basis, you can request an Access Oakland business account by clicking the button at the top right corner of this page. Please note that you do not need to establish a business account for one-time use Property Gateway.
  
• Pay Local Taxes: is a service provided by the Oakland County Treasurer to assist local governments within Oakland County in accepting tax payments online.
  
• G2G Cloud Solutions: is an initiative of Oakland County that allows government agencies to take credit card payments at the counter or online.
  
• CLEMIS Citations: provides a service to the public in an effort to make paying tickets more convenient by allowing participating Police Departments and District Courts the ability for citizens to pay Civil Infraction and Misdemeanor tickets online.
  
• Court Recurring Payments: provides collections through recurring payments for Admin, Circuit Court and Family Court.
  
• Survey Oakland: is subscription-based application that licensed surveyors and related professionals can use to view section corners (with dossiers for peer-approved remounted corners), NGS control, unrecorded surveys, property controlling corners, and scanned original survey/site plans for condos (Exhibit Bs), along with other related spatial data.

Property Gateway is a leading-edge Internet tool built to provide free and fee-based online access to Oakland County's land and property information including tax parcel reports and maps. Reports and maps can be purchased via a credit card transaction; recurring users request a business account. Visit Property Gateway, HERE.

Geospatial data about Oakland County, Michigan Lot Lines. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

Geospatial data about Oakland County, MI Subdivisions. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE.
The downloaded SSURGO data included an ArcGIS Shapefile of the soil type features for Oakland County, tabular data in text file format, and an empty pre-formatted Microsoft Access database containing queries, macros and reports. The Shapefile was intially projected in State Plane Michigan South Meters NAD 83, but was then reprojected by Oakland County staff to State Plane Michigan South International Feet NAD 83. The USDA-NRCS provided instructions for automatically importing the tabular text files into the Microsoft Access database. The key attribute of this feature class is the map unit key (MUSYM field), which relates the polygon features to the SoilAttribute table stored within SDE. The related SoilAttribute table in SDE contains some of the tabular data which was initially imported into the aforementioned Microsoft Access database.

A spatial representation of a subset of parcel features that contain special use characteristics. This polygon feature class is maintained in a geodatabase using topology with the TaxParcel feature class. The key attribute is AccessType, which describes the type of access (Prescriptive, Dedicated, or Private) on the feature.

© Oakland County, MI

This data was created as part of a study that examined the accessibility to jobs by auto in the 50 largest (by population) metropolitan areas in the United States. It is the most detailed evaluation to date of access to jobs by auto, and it allows for a direct comparison of the auto accessibility performance of America's largest metropolitan areas. This data is part of a longitudinal study. The data available describe access to jobs by auto in the states of Arkansas, California, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Tennessee, Washington, and Virginia, and the metropolitan areas within these states. Downloads are available for individual metropolitan regions, as well as states, in Geopackage format. A combined ZIP file containing the data for all metropolitan regions is available, and is labeled as "All Metropolitan Regions."

BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE.
A spatial representation of land that is currently protected by a Farmland Development Rights Agreement (commonly known as PA 116) with the State of Michigan. The sites were located by a recorded document search through Land Access. Polygons were created using parcels as a base when applicable and by using coordinate geometry to digitize the legal description associated with agreement. The key attributes include the start and end date of the agreement, the name of the initiator, and the liber/page of the recorded document.

Each agreement was located through Land Access, Oakland County's public records tool. A search was conducted to find all recorded documents where the State of Michigan is the Grantee and the document type is an Agreement. Each search result was verified to be a current Farmland Development Rights Agreement and was then digitized. When a parcel identification number (PIN) was available, the polygon was simply copied from the Tax Parcel Feature Class. If a PIN was not available, the polygon was created using coordinate geometry. If only part of a parcel is described in the legal description, then only that part is represented in the dataset. The attribute information was also collected from Land Access.

PayLocalTaxes.com is a service provided by the Oakland County Treasurer to assist local governments within Oakland County in accepting tax payments online. Please make a selection to pay current or delinquent taxes.Please note that online payments may require the purchase of a Tax Statement or Current Tax Profile. A small fee to purchase a Tax Statement or Current Tax Profile is charged by Oakland County to recover costs associated with developing the technology required in providing this online payment service.In addition, all online payments will include an Enhanced Access Fee as provided by Public Act 462 of 1996, Enhanced Access to Public Records Act. This fee is based on a percentage of the total amount of the payment you are making online.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. A spatial representation of a subset of parcel features that contain special use characteristics. This polygon feature class is maintained in a geodatabase using topology with the TaxParcel feature class. The key attribute is AccessType, which describes the type of access (Prescriptive, Dedicated, or Private) on the feature.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. Each point represents the spatial location of adult foster care facilities in Oakland County. This feature class will be used in support of Emergency Response and Preparedness (ERP). This feature class contains only the unique ID (LicenseNumber) that is used to relate this feature class to the associated object class containing the remaining attribute information. To create this feature class, the following process was used: a text file was downloaded from the DHS Web site (http://www.michigan.gov/dhs/0,1607,7-124-5455_27716_27717-82231--,00.html) on April 20, 2010. The text file was imported into Access. A copy of the table was made for geocoding puposes, and some of the attributes changed to get a better hit rate when geocoding (e.g., the zip codes were changed to 5 digit numbers, and obvious spelling errors in the road names were fixed). The table was first geocoded to parcel centers, then geocoded to the road centerline. Point features from the previous feature class were copied over for some of remaining unmatched addresses. Of the 577 records, 572 (99%) of them were geocoded using one of these methods. DHS's list of adult care facilities updated on a daily basis. Oakland County plans to update their geocoded file on a yearly basis.

Geospatial data about Oakland County, Michigan Airport Contours. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. Student safety zones are 1000' buffers around a school facility (Elementary, Middle and High school). Registered sex offenders are not permitted to live within these buffers. When a sex offender moves, they are required by law to register with the local law enforcement, who must verify that the address is not within a safety zone. Though the definition of a school safety zone could change with legislation, the parameters that were used to create this data were: A buffer of 1000’ from the parcel boundary of the school (versus just the centroid of the parcel, or from the building itself)Any K-12 school, public or private, should have a buffer. Teaching needs to occur in the building (i.e., not admin-only buildings)Preschools and day cares are excludedThis polygon feature class was originally created by buffering the Oakland County's Educational feature class. The key attributes include the facility Name, Address,Type (Elementary, Middle, High) and Access (Public, Private).

Analysis of ‘OC Conservation Easement’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/f3bdd9f9-8e30-4f3d-8d60-4ffa1e02e3f5 on 26 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

Analysis of ‘OC 2004 MNFI Potential Natural Areas’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/374a078a-6d92-458e-98eb-16592e4c225a on 26 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE.
A spatial representation of potential natural areas. The polygons contained in this feature class were derived from data developed for the 2004 Oakland County Natural Areas Report update. Each feature was assigned a priority of One, Two, or Three. Digital Landcover, orthophotography, and USGS quadrangle maps were the main sources used to identify each natural area. The data from the Oakland County Natural Areas update project was collected in 2004. Key attributes include Priority and TotalScore. "Priority" is a reflection of quality and indicates the level of priority to retain or conserve the natural state of the identified area.

The NaturalArea2004 data should be distributed with the Oakland County Potential Conservation/Natural Areas Report - April 2004. This document provides essential information for the attributes and procedures used to create the features in the dataset.

Shiawassee & Huron Headwaters Resource Preservation Project - March 2000
Project Staff:

• Carlisle Wortman & Associates - Richard Carlisle, PCP, and Carey Nyberg
• Land Information Access Association - Joe VanderMeulen
• Michigan Natural Features Inventory - John Paskus
• Oakland County Planning & Economic Development Services - Bret C. Rasegan, RA, Charlotte P. Burckhardt, AICP, PCP, Lawrence S. Falardeau, RLA, Russell Lewis, RA, Leslie E. Kettren, AICP, Jim Keglovitz, and JoAnn Browning

The Shiawassee and Huron Headwaters Resource Preservation Project involved six communities (Highland, Milford, Rose, Springfield, and White Lake Townships, and the Village of Milford) in western Oakland County. A Steering Committee composed of local officials, developers, property owners, and land conservancy members was the policy group that directed the project. The Steering Committee contracted with the Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) to identify potentially significant natural areas.

Oakland County Potential Conservation/Natural Areas Report - July 2002
Prepared by:
John Paskus, Associate Program Leader - Conservation
Michael Penskar, Program Leader - Botany
Helen Enander, Information Technologist I

Oakland County Potential Conservation/Natural Areas Report - April 2004
Prepared by:
John Paskus, Associate Program Leader - Conservation
Helen Enander, Information Technologist I Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 8th Floor, Mason Bldg. Lansing, MI 48909-7944

This report identifies and ranks Potential Natural Areas remaining in Oakland County. Potential Natural Areas are defined as places on the landscape dominated by native vegetation that have various levels of potential for harboring high quality natural areas and unique natural features. In addition these areas may provide critical ecological services such as maintaining water quality and quantity, soil development and stabilization, pollination of cropland, wildlife travel corridors, stopover sites for migratory birds, sources of genetic diversity, and floodwater retention. However, the actual ecological value of these areas can only be truly ascertained through on the ground biological surveys. The process established by the Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) of identifying potential conservation areas can also be used to update and track the status of these remaining sites. The site map and ranking data can be used by local municipalities, land trusts, and other agencies to prioritize conservation efforts and assist in finding opportunities to establish an open space system of linked natural areas throughout Oakland County.

In this report the term "potential natural area" has been used in place of the term "potential conservation area". The substitution was made in order to convey to the reader a clearer picture of the type of sites that are being delineated. It is felt that more people have a better understanding of the term "natural area". The term "potential natural area", however, is not to be confused with the legal term "dedicated Natural Area" as described in Part 351, Wilderness and Natural Areas, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act of 1994 which gives land special legal protection.

When using this information it is important to keep in mind that site boundaries and ranking are a starting point and tend to be somewhat general in nature. Consequently, each community, group or individual using this information should determine what additional expertise is needed in order to establish more exact boundaries and the most appropriate conservation efforts.

Materials and Interpretation Methodology:
Interpretation of the 25-township area in Oakland County was conducted by using digital aerial photography taken in 2002, Tax Parcel, and 2002 Oakland County Potential Conservation/Natural Areas provided by Oakland County's Planning and Economic Development Services Division.

As the townships were methodically interpreted and digitized using this imagery, the same areas were examined using: Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG) 2000 digital landcover, Michigan Center for Geographic Information (MCGI) MI Geographic Framework Hydrography (v3b), and Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) Biotics Database. These additional data sources were used to enhance and corroborate the interpretation process.

Delineation of sites was done through aerial photo interpretation, with emphasis placed on 1) intactness, 2) wetlands and wetland complexes, 3) riparian corridors, and 4) forested tracts. Delineation of sites during this phase of the process was done conservatively, such that the chance of capturing sites that may end up being eliminated upon closer inspection, was greater than the chance of omitting sites that should have been delineated. Sites were delineated by focusing on wetlands and forest tracts and eliminating as much development (including roads), active agriculture and old fields as possible. Boundaries typically were defined by hard edges such as roads, parking lots, developments, and railroad beds. All potential natural areas were identified and delineated regardless of size. Municipal boundaries were not utilized to delineate site boundaries unless the boundary corresponded to a defined hard edge, such as a road. Once all sites were delineated, sites under 20 acres were deleted.

Following the aerial photo interpretation and the delineation of potential natural areas, a more rigorous level of examination was undertaken based upon specific scaled criteria to prioritize sites. The criteria used to first delineate the sites were translated to a numerical scale. Each site could then be assessed based upon the scaled criteria and a total calculated score, based upon the sum of the scores for each criterion.

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

Analysis of ‘OC Soils’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/004d7041-c722-4d8c-a19e-c4e2eb9307bf on 28 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE.
The downloaded SSURGO data included an ArcGIS Shapefile of the soil type features for Oakland County, tabular data in text file format, and an empty pre-formatted Microsoft Access database containing queries, macros and reports. The Shapefile was intially projected in State Plane Michigan South Meters NAD 83, but was then reprojected by Oakland County staff to State Plane Michigan South International Feet NAD 83. The USDA-NRCS provided instructions for automatically importing the tabular text files into the Microsoft Access database. The key attribute of this feature class is the map unit key (MUSYM field), which relates the polygon features to the SoilAttribute table stored within SDE. The related SoilAttribute table in SDE contains some of the tabular data which was initially imported into the aforementioned Microsoft Access database.

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE.A spatial representation of the locations of Michigan UIA Problem Resolution Offices (PRO).Data Source: PRO Locations

Problem Resolution Offices - Need Help?The UIA's Problem Resolution Offices (PROs) resolve customer problems and provide access to automated resources.PROs provide:Telephones and computers for the convenience of customers who may not have access to a computer or telephone to file their claim. If you are going to file an unemployment claim at a PRO, please bring: Your Social Security Number, your Driver's License Number or State Identification or your MARVIN PIN (if you have one); along with the names and addresses of employers you have worked for in the past 18 months with your quarterly gross earnings and the last date of employment with each employer. If you are not a U.S. citizen or national, you will need your Alien Registration Number and the expiration date of your work authorization.In-person help for problems with claimsA presence in the community that includes, on request, presentations about unemployment insurance services to employer, business, labor, and community groupsFile at a PRO: If you are going to file an unemployment claim at a PRO, please bring:Your Social Security Number, your Driver's License Number or State Identification or your MARVIN PIN (if you have one)If you are not a U.S. citizen or national, you will need your Alien Registration Number and the expiration date of your work authorization.Names and addresses of employers you have worked for in the past 18 months including quarterly gross earnings and the last date of employment with each.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. A spatial representation of potential natural areas. The polygons contained in this feature class were derived from data developed for the 2004 Oakland County Natural Areas Report update. Each feature was assigned a priority of One, Two, or Three. Digital Landcover, orthophotography, and USGS quadrangle maps were the main sources used to identify each natural area. The data from the Oakland County Natural Areas update project was collected in 2004. Key attributes include Priority and TotalScore. "Priority" is a reflection of quality and indicates the level of priority to retain or conserve the natural state of the identified area.The NaturalArea2004 data should be distributed with the Oakland County Potential Conservation/Natural Areas Report - April 2004. This document provides essential information for the attributes and procedures used to create the features in the dataset. Shiawassee & Huron Headwaters Resource Preservation Project - March 2000 Project Staff: Carlisle Wortman & Associates - Richard Carlisle, PCP, and Carey Nyberg Land Information Access Association - Joe VanderMeulen Michigan Natural Features Inventory - John Paskus Oakland County Planning & Economic Development Services - Bret C. Rasegan, RA, Charlotte P. Burckhardt, AICP, PCP, Lawrence S. Falardeau, RLA, Russell Lewis, RA, Leslie E. Kettren, AICP, Jim Keglovitz, and JoAnn Browning The Shiawassee and Huron Headwaters Resource Preservation Project involved six communities (Highland, Milford, Rose, Springfield, and White Lake Townships, and the Village of Milford) in western Oakland County. A Steering Committee composed of local officials, developers, property owners, and land conservancy members was the policy group that directed the project. The Steering Committee contracted with the Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) to identify potentially significant natural areas. Oakland County Potential Conservation/Natural Areas Report - July 2002 Prepared by: John Paskus, Associate Program Leader - Conservation Michael Penskar, Program Leader - Botany Helen Enander, Information Technologist I Oakland County Potential Conservation/Natural Areas Report - April 2004 Prepared by: John Paskus, Associate Program Leader - Conservation Helen Enander, Information Technologist I Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 8th Floor, Mason Bldg. Lansing, MI 48909-7944 This report identifies and ranks Potential Natural Areas remaining in Oakland County. Potential Natural Areas are defined as places on the landscape dominated by native vegetation that have various levels of potential for harboring high quality natural areas and unique natural features. In addition these areas may provide critical ecological services such as maintaining water quality and quantity, soil development and stabilization, pollination of cropland, wildlife travel corridors, stopover sites for migratory birds, sources of genetic diversity, and floodwater retention. However, the actual ecological value of these areas can only be truly ascertained through on the ground biological surveys. The process established by the Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) of identifying potential conservation areas can also be used to update and track the status of these remaining sites. The site map and ranking data can be used by local municipalities, land trusts, and other agencies to prioritize conservation efforts and assist in finding opportunities to establish an open space system of linked natural areas throughout Oakland County. In this report the term "potential natural area" has been used in place of the term "potential conservation area". The substitution was made in order to convey to the reader a clearer picture of the type of sites that are being delineated. It is felt that more people have a better understanding of the term "natural area". The term "potential natural area", however, is not to be confused with the legal term "dedicated Natural Area" as described in Part 351, Wilderness and Natural Areas, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act of 1994 which gives land special legal protection.When using this information it is important to keep in mind that site boundaries and ranking are a starting point and tend to be somewhat general in nature. Consequently, each community, group or individual using this information should determine what additional expertise is needed in order to establish more exact boundaries and the most appropriate conservation efforts. Materials and Interpretation Methodology: Interpretation of the 25-township area in Oakland County was conducted by using digital aerial photography taken in 2002, Tax Parcel, and 2002 Oakland County Potential Conservation/Natural Areas provided by Oakland County's Planning and Economic Development Services Division. As the townships were methodically interpreted and digitized using this imagery, the same areas were examined using: Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG) 2000 digital landcover, Michigan Center for Geographic Information (MCGI) MI Geographic Framework Hydrography (v3b), and Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) Biotics Database. These additional data sources were used to enhance and corroborate the interpretation process. Delineation of sites was done through aerial photo interpretation, with emphasis placed on 1) intactness, 2) wetlands and wetland complexes, 3) riparian corridors, and 4) forested tracts. Delineation of sites during this phase of the process was done conservatively, such that the chance of capturing sites that may end up being eliminated upon closer inspection, was greater than the chance of omitting sites that should have been delineated. Sites were delineated by focusing on wetlands and forest tracts and eliminating as much development (including roads), active agriculture and old fields as possible. Boundaries typically were defined by hard edges such as roads, parking lots, developments, and railroad beds. All potential natural areas were identified and delineated regardless of size. Municipal boundaries were not utilized to delineate site boundaries unless the boundary corresponded to a defined hard edge, such as a road. Once all sites were delineated, sites under 20 acres were deleted. Following the aerial photo interpretation and the delineation of potential natural areas, a more rigorous level of examination was undertaken based upon specific scaled criteria to prioritize sites. The criteria used to first delineate the sites were translated to a numerical scale. Each site could then be assessed based upon the scaled criteria and a total calculated score, based upon the sum of the scores for each criterion.