14 datasets found
  1. a

    Property Gateway

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • detroitdata.org
    • +4more
    Updated Apr 23, 2013
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2013). Property Gateway [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/oakgov::property-gateway
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 23, 2013
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Description

    Oakland County's public-facing parcel viewer. Oakland County staff and CVTs can request free accounts by contacting the Oakland County Service Center (servicecenter@oakgov.com, 248-858-8812). More information about the products available in Property Gateway can be found here: https://www.oakgov.com/propertygateway/Pages/default.aspx.

  2. D

    Property Gateway

    • detroitdata.org
    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Apr 28, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2017). Property Gateway [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/property-gateway3
    Explore at:
    arcgis geoservices rest api, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 28, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Description

    Property Gateway is a leading-edge Internet tool built to provide free and fee-based online access to Oakland County's land and property information including tax parcel reports and maps. Reports and maps can be purchased via a credit card transaction; recurring users request a business account. Visit Property Gateway, HERE.

  3. D

    OC Tax Parcels (Public)

    • detroitdata.org
    • data.ferndalemi.gov
    • +6more
    Updated Nov 10, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2020). OC Tax Parcels (Public) [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/oc-tax-parcels-public1
    Explore at:
    html, zip, kml, arcgis geoservices rest api, csv, geojsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 10, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE.
    A spatial representation of Tax Parcels. Key attributes include KeyPIN. The KeyPIN is the unique parcel identification number used to link the tax parcel to the parcel attributes which are stored and maintained in Oakland County land records.


    There is no definite accuracy related to parcel boundaries. The information shown on these maps is for representation purposes only and is not intended to be a legally recorded map or survey. The information was compiled from a number of sources including recorded deeds, plats, tax maps surveys and other public records and data. Users of this data should consult the information sources listed above for verification of the information.


  4. TIGER/Line Shapefile, Current, County, Oakland County, MI, All Roads

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Aug 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division (Point of Contact) (2025). TIGER/Line Shapefile, Current, County, Oakland County, MI, All Roads [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-current-county-oakland-county-mi-all-roads
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 8, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Oakland County
    Description

    This resource is a member of a series. The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) System (MTS). The MTS represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The All Roads shapefile includes all features within the MTS Super Class "Road/Path Features" distinguished where the MAF/TIGER Feature Classification Code (MTFCC) for the feature in the MTS that begins with "S". This includes all primary, secondary, local neighborhood, and rural roads, city streets, vehicular trails (4wd), ramps, service drives, alleys, parking lot roads, private roads for service vehicles (logging, oil fields, ranches, etc.), bike paths or trails, bridle/horse paths, walkways/pedestrian trails, and stairways.

  5. d

    OC Land Use 1966

    • portal.datadrivendetroit.org
    • detroitdata.org
    Updated Oct 16, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2016). OC Land Use 1966 [Dataset]. https://portal.datadrivendetroit.org/datasets/oakgov::oc-land-use-1966/data
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 16, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. The primary purpose of this data is to be used by Oakland County Planning and Economic Development Services, other County departments, and and local communities for planning purposes. The two major uses are cartographic output and creating summaries at various spatial extents.

    The intent of this feature class was to provide a very general representation of a hard copy 1966 land use map. The spatial accuracy and number of vertices used to represent each feature was limited by the intended purpose of the data.

    The land use features were heads-up digitized from a 1966 land use map that was scanned and georefereneced using each section corner as a control point. The features were digitized at a scale not greater than 1:15,000, one square-mile section at a time. After the entire county was completely digitized, the features were dissolved based on the Landuse.

    Right-of-Way was burned in to the final feature class using the following process. First, the current RoadCenterline feature class was modifed to reflect roads in 1966 using the scanned 1966 land use map and 1963 orthophotography as a reference. Next, the road lines were buffered at specified distanced based on the RoadCode attribute from RoadCenterline to create polygons. Major Roads were split into two types (Perscriptive Easement and Dedicated) based on if the adjacent property was platted prior to 1966. According to the Oakland County Register of Deeds, in 1966 Oakland County was recording documents in liber 120. For the purpose of this feature class it was assumed that simultaneous conveyances recorded in liber 120 or earlier existed in 1966. Major roads that intersected or were adjacent with these simultaneous conveyances were classified as Dedicated and the remainder of Major Roads were classified as a Perscriptive Easement. The buffer distances, representing half the total Right-of-Way width, used for each road code are listed below:

     Minor Road - 30 feet
     Major Road (Perscriptive Easement) - 33 feet
     Major Road (Dedicated) - 46.5 feet
     State Highway - 46.5 feet
    

    U.S. Highway - 46.5 feet Interstate - 60 feet feet

    These Right-of-Way widths generally approximate those that actually existed in 1966 and are not intended to indicate the exact width of a specific Right-of-Way. All areas completely surrounded by Right-of-Way such as between directions of travel of a boulevard or interstate or the area inside of a freeway interchange were manually attributed as Right-of-Way.

    Water features were burned in the final feature class using a modified version the of the Oakland County Waterbody feature class.
    This data was modified to reflect waterbodies in 1966 using the 1966 land use map and 1963 orthophotography as a reference.

    Lastly, the features that intersected community boudaries were split using the Identity tool to increase cartographic and analytic performance.

  6. f

    OC Current Land Use

    • data.ferndalemi.gov
    • detroitdata.org
    • +5more
    Updated Feb 17, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2021). OC Current Land Use [Dataset]. https://data.ferndalemi.gov/items/c60463c62ffa4600bdd3ffe70ee6198f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 17, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. A spatial representation of land use. The polygons contained in this feature class were derived from the Oakland County Tax Parcel feature class. Each parcel was categorized by its land use. When a parcel has multiple land uses, the dominant land use is shown. Assessing records and orthophotography were the main sources used to attribute each tax parcel with land use information. The data was collected in 2021. Key attributes are the land use and key pin (Sidwell number). Land Use stores the Land Use description for each parcel. The Key Pin is the unique Parcel Identification Number (Pin) used to link the parcel to the parcel attributes which are stored and maintained in Oakland County Land Records.

  7. D

    OC Composite Master Plan

    • detroitdata.org
    • portal.datadrivendetroit.org
    • +4more
    Updated Oct 14, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2020). OC Composite Master Plan [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/oc-composite-master-plan
    Explore at:
    csv, arcgis geoservices rest api, html, kml, zip, geojsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 14, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Description
    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE.
    A spatial representation of generalized Oakland County community master plans. These polygons were digitized from each of Oakland's 62 community's future land use map in their master plan. The data was completed in March of 2006 and will be updated as each community amends their plan. The key attribute is Composite Plan representing generalized, countywide future land uses.

    This data depicts a future land use based on each community's master plan as currently adopted. The data will be updated each time a community amends their master plan. Below is a list recording the master plan and date of adoption that was used to digitize each community.
    • Township of Addison Addison Township Land Use Master Plan - 7/9/2002
    • City of Auburn Hills City of Auburn Hills Master Land Use Plan - 11/7/2002 Auburn Hills Opkyke Road Corridor Study - 2/1/2007 Auburn Hills Collier Road Area Land Use Study - 1/3/2008
    • City of Berkley City of Berkley, Michigan Master Plan Update - 1/23/2007
    • Village of Beverly Hills Village of Beverly Hills Master Plan - 3/28/2007
    • Village of Bingham Farms Village of Bingham Farms Master Plan - 9/13/2004
    • City of Birmingham The Birmingham Plan - 1/1/1979
    • Township of Bloomfield Charter Township of Bloomfield Master Plan Update - 3/26/2007
    • City of Bloomfield Hills Master Plan of Land Use City of Bloomfield Hills - 8/11/1987
    • Township of Brandon Brandon Township Land Use Plan Update - 3/14/2000
    • City of the Village of Clarkston Master Plan City of the Village of Clarkston - 8/4/1997
    • City of Clawson Downtown Clawson Framework Urban Design Plan - 11/1/2004 Master Plan City of Clawson - 1/23/1990
    • Township of Commerce Commerce Charter Township Master Plan 2003 - 6/28/2004 Commerce Charter Township Master Plan Amendment - 11/27/2006
    • City of Farmington Master Plan City of Farmington - 2/1/1998 City of Farmington Hills Master Plan for Future Land Use
    • City of Farmington Hills - 3/28/1996
    • City of Fenton Holly Township Master Plan - 11/10/2003 (Used the Holly Township Master Plan because Fenton's was unavailable)
    • City of Ferndale City of Ferndale Land Use Plan - 6/1/1998
    • Village of Franklin Franklin Village Master Plan Update - 10/15/1997
    • Township of Groveland Master Plan for Future Land Use - 5/9/2005
    • City of Hazel Park Master Plan, Hazel Park Michigan - 3/21/2000
    • Township of Highland Highland Township Comprehensive Land Use Plan 2000-2020 - 7/6/2000 South Milford Road Corridor Micro-Area Analysis - 4/13/2005 East Highland Commercial District Micro Area Analysis - 12/19/2002 West Highland Micro-Area Analysis - 8/2/2001 North Hickory Ridge Road Micro-Area Analysis - 12/7/2006
    • Township of Holly Holly Township Master Plan - 11/10/2003
    • Village of Holly Village of Holly Master Plan - 1/24/2007
    • City of Huntington Woods Huntington Woods Master Plan - 12/17/2007
    • Township of Independence Independence Township Vision 2020 Master Plan - 12/9/1999
    • City of Keego Harbor City of Keego Harbor Comprehensive Master Plan - 9/5/2002
    • City of Lake Angelus City of Lake Angelus Master Plan - 7/25/1994
    • Village of Lake Orion Master Plan 2002-2022 - 1/6/2003 Amendment #1 to Lake Orion Master Plan - 3/3/2008
    • City of Lathrup Village The Lathrup Village Plan - 1/1/1981
    • Village of Leonard Master Plan Village of Leonard - 10/17/1991
    • Township of Lyon Charter Township of Lyon Master Plan - 3/27/2006
    • City of Madison Heights Madison Heights Master Plan: 1990, 2000, 2010 - 10/16/1990 Madison Heights Future Land Use Plan Amendment - 5/15/2007
    • Township of Milford Charter Township of Milford Land Use Plan Update - 5/27/1999
    • Village of Milford Village of Milford Master Plan - 3/1/1998
    • City of Northville City of Northville Master Plan - 2/22/2000
    • City of Novi City of Novi Master Plan for Land Use 2004 - 12/1/2004 City of Novi Master Plan for Land Use Amendments - 4/16/2008
    • Township of Novi None (Does not have a Master Plan, assumed to be Single Family Residential)
    • City of Oak Park City of Oak Park Master Plan - 9/9/1996 City of Oak Park Master Plan Addition - Unknown
    • Township of Oakland Oakland Charter Township A Community Master Plan - 1/4/2005
    • City of Orchard Lake Village Master Plan City of Orchard Lake Village - 6/6/2006
    • Township of Orion Orion Township Master Plan - 5/7/2003 Lapeer Road Master Plan Update - 4/19/2006
    • Village of Ortonville The Ortonville Plan - 1/1/1980
    • Township of Oxford Charter Township of Oxford Master Plan - 7/14/2005 Village of Oxford Village of Oxford Master Plan - 5/10/2005
    • City of Pleasant Ridge City of Pleasant Ridge Community Master Plan - 9/1/1999
    • City of Pontiac Pontiac 2010 A New Reality - 12/4/1991 City of Rochester Master Plan: 2000
    • City of Rochester - 6/3/2000 Downtown Development Area MP amendment - 5/2/2005
    • City of Rochester Hills Rochester Hills Master Land Use Plan 2007 - 2/6/2007 Township of Rose Master Plan Rose Township - 7/7/2005
    • City of Royal Oak Master Plan City of Royal Oak - 8/24/1999
    • Township of Royal Oak A Vision for the Year 2010 Master Plan 1996 Update - 12/11/1996
    • City of South Lyon Master Plan of Future Land Use City of South Lyon - 1/10/2002
    • City of Southfield Southfield Master Plan - 1/1/1988 Township of Southfield Southfield Township Master Plan - 11/25/2002
    • Township of Springfield Springfield Township Master Plan - 3/7/2002
    • City of Sylvan Lake Sylvan Lake Master Plan 2005 - 4/10/2007
    • City of Troy City of Troy Future Land Use Plan - 1/8/2002 City of Walled Lake City of Walled Lake Master Plan - 8/1/2002
    • Township of Waterford Waterford Master Plan 2003-2023 - 1/2/2003
    • Township of West Bloomfield West Bloomfield Township 2005 Master Land Use Plan Update - 7/26/2005
    • Township of White Lake White Lake Township Master Plan - 10/6/2006
    • City of Wixom City of Wixom Master Plan - 8/9/2005
    • Village of Wolverine Lake Village of Wolverine Lake Land Use Plan - 12/4/1985

    Every category identified on the future land use map within each master plan was translated into a composite value. For example, one community may have two commercial districts- Local Commerical and General Commercial. Another community may have three commercial districts- Neighborhood Commercial, Hi-Tech Office, and Retail Commercial. A wide range of uses could be included in these categories, but for the purpose of this feature class, they are all translated into "Commercial/Office." In some cases a category on community's future land use map could not be translated into a single composite category. When this occurred, areas were manually translated into the appropriate generalized category. For example, a Public Lands class on a community's map would be manually translated into the Public/Institutional and Recreation/Conservation composite categories.
  8. d

    OC Parcel History

    • portal.datadrivendetroit.org
    • detroitdata.org
    • +6more
    Updated Oct 17, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2016). OC Parcel History [Dataset]. https://portal.datadrivendetroit.org/datasets/oakgov::oc-parcel-history
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 17, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. A spatial representation of parcel history. This polygon feature class is created and maintained through the use of a customized tool for parcel maintenance management. As parcel splits and combinations create child parcels, the parent parcels are saved out to the parcel history feature class. Retired tax parcels have been maintained since 1998. Right of way and alley vacations are also maintained in this feature class. Vacations have been maintained since Spring, 2005. The key attributes include parcel identification number (KeyPIN) and the creation date (RevisionDate).

  9. o

    OC School District

    • accessoakland.oakgov.com
    • detroitdata.org
    • +5more
    Updated Oct 16, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2016). OC School District [Dataset]. https://accessoakland.oakgov.com/datasets/oc-school-district
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 16, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. A spatial representation of school district boundaries. This polygon feature class was initially derived from the 1998 Parcel polygon feature class, based on a common school district code as maintained in the Oakland County Land Records database. The key attribute is Name (the school district name).

  10. d

    OC Development Authority

    • portal.datadrivendetroit.org
    • detroitdata.org
    • +7more
    Updated Oct 16, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2016). OC Development Authority [Dataset]. https://portal.datadrivendetroit.org/datasets/oakgov::oc-development-authority
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 16, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. The DevelopmentAuthority polygon feature class identifies certain types of entities that encourage development/redevelopment in designated areas. This feature class currently represents Downtown Development Authorities (DDA), Tax Increment Finance Authorities (TIFA), and Local Development Finance Authorities (LDFA); however, it will also depict Corridor Improvement Authorities (CIA) and Brownfield Redevelopment Authorities (BRA) in the future. These five types of authorities have the ability to capture tax increment financing (TIF). The features were digitized using legal descriptions, parcel lists, and maps that were provided to the State of Michigan Office of the Great Seal and/or Oakland County Equalization by the authority. The key attributes are Name (official name of the authority), Type (the type of development authority), and DevelopmentPlan (yes/no indicating if the feature represents an area that is part of a development plan and can caputre tax increment financing).Tax Increment Financing is a tool used to promote redevelopment and community improvement projects by channeling funding toward projects in targeted areas. TIF is captured from the increase of property values from a base year. Millage rates from taxing jurisdictions are applied to the increased value. The resulting tax revenue is directed to the authority, rather than the appropriate jurisdiction. Beginning in 1994, taxing jurisdictions have the option to "opt out" of having its taxes captured by the authority. Also since 1994, school taxes may no longer be captured unless they are necessary to make payments on existing eligible obligations. For more information about TIF, see Michigan Department of Treasury's Tax Increment Financing FAQ web page at http://www.michigan.gov/treasury/0,1607,7-121-3218---F,00.html. The State of Michigan has adopted enabling legislation to allow TIF through five types of authorities. Each type of authority has a focus relating to development/redevelopment: Downtown Development Authority (PA 197 of 1975) Correct and prevent deterioration in business districtsEncourage historic preservationPromote economic growth of the districts Tax Increment Finance Authority (PA 450 of 1980)Prevent urban deteriorationEncourage economic development and activityEncourage neighborhood revitalization and historic preservationClosed to new applicants since 1987Allows the development of virtually any type of land use Local Development Finance Authority (PA 281 of 1986)Encourage local developmentPromote conditions of employmentPromote economic growthLimited to business activities involving:ManufacturingAgricultural processingHigh-technology activitiesEnergy productionBusiness incubators Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (PA 381 of 1996)Promote revitalization, redevelopment, and reuse of certain propertyFocus on tax reverted, blighted, or functionally obsolete propertyMDEQ must approve brownfield redevelopment areas Corridor Improvement Authority (PA 281 of 2005)Correct and prevent deterioration in business districtsEncourage historic preservationPromote economic growth of the districtsMust be adjacent to a road classified as an arterial or collectorThese quasi-public entities are created by resolution through a community's governing body. CIA and LDFA boundaries may cross municipal boundaries. In the case of these multi-jurisdictional authorities, both communities must pass resolutions establishing authority. There is currently only one Joint LDFA (Cities of Southfield and Troy) and there are no CIAs in Oakland County. When the community establishes the authority, it must also define the geographic boundaries in which it will operate. DDAs and CIAs are authorized to levy and collect taxes through a special assessment on all properties within the authority boundary. After the authority and its boundaries are established, the authority creates a tax increment financing and development plan. The plan estimates the amount of tax increment financing that will be captured and lists specific projects on which it will be spent. It also defines the development area where the tax increment financing and projects will occur. The development area must be completely within the authority boundary; however, it may be coincident with the authority boundary. An authority may contain multiple development areas, each with its own development and tax increment financing plan. BRAs normally designate development areas as a one or two parcels for a specific development project, while the other types of authorities define development areas as a larger area. Also, LDFAs are only allowed to capture TIF from parcels in a permitted use, such as manufacturing. There may be both eliglible and inelgible parcels within a development area; however, the inelgible parcels do not participate in TIF capture. The base year used to calculate the amount of tax increment financing is set when the development plan is adopted. If the development plan is expanded at a later date, the base year could be reset for the entire development area or the capture could be calculated using multiple base years. The source for the base year was the tax billing code used by Oakland County Equalization. When no tax billing code was available (for communities that don't use the county's assessing system), the community was contacted to obtain the base year. When two separate authorities overlap, each authority can establish overlapping development areas. The authority that first created the development area has first claim on tax increment financing capture. Authority boundaries are represented using multiple features when the development area is not coincident with the authority boundary. One feature represents the development area and a second feature represents the remainder of the authority district that is not part of the development area. Multiple features are also used to represent authorities that have multiple development areas or development areas that have multiple base years. Brownfield Redevelopment Authorities are unique in that the authority boundaries are generally defined as the entire municipality. For this reason, the non-development areas of BRA's have been excluded from this data. The following list shows communities in Oakland County that have established a BRA: City of Auburn Hills City of Birmingham City of Farmington City of Farmington Hills City of Ferndale City of Hazel Park Charter Township of Highland Village of Holly City of Madison Heights Village of Milford County of Oakland City of Oak Park City of Pontiac City of Rochester City of Rochester Hills Charter Twp of Royal Oak City of Royal Oak City of Southfield City of Troy Charter Township of Waterford Source documents for the boundary of each feature were obtained from the State of Michigan Office of the Great Seal, Oakland County Equalization, and the Oakland County Treasurer's office. These could be in the form of a legal description, parcel list, and/or map. For several boundaries, multiple sources were available and conflicted with each other. When this occurred, hierarchy was given to the legal description, then a parcel list, over the map, and the conflict is noted in the Comments field. However, if a parcel was shown in a parcel list, but not described in the authority based on the legal description, then it was still shown in the authority.It should also be noted that legal descriptions were not digitized using exact coordinate geometry. Instead, features were created by referencing the legal description to snap vertices to parcels, right-of-way, section corners, subdivisions, and lots. Features digitized from a legal description or map included road and railroad rights-of-way as it was described or shown in the document.For vague legal descriptions and parcel lists, right-of-way was addressed uniquely for each authority. Some source documents had statements that all or half of the surrounding right-of-way is to be included in the boundary, but some did not address right-of-way at all. In these cases, right-of-way was addressed distinctly for each authority based on the type of authority and the source documents with the method used recorded in the Comments field. The data will be updated on an "as needed" basis when authorities amend their development plans or new authorities are established. Oakland County Equalization and the Oakland County Treasurer's Office will notify and forward the source documents of necessary revisions to Oakland County Planning and Economic Development Services who is the custodian of the feature class. Communities will be contacted annually to verify that the districts have not changed without the knowledge of county departments. In particular, county departments may not be aware of BRA development projects when no TIF is captured. Lastly, because the tax parcel feature class is revised periodically and it is important for the features to be coincident with the tax parcel feature class, the development authority feature class will also be updated annually to correct conflicts due to parcel shifting.

  11. d

    OC Recreation Land

    • portal.datadrivendetroit.org
    • detroitdata.org
    • +6more
    Updated Oct 17, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2016). OC Recreation Land [Dataset]. https://portal.datadrivendetroit.org/maps/oakgov::oc-recreation-land
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 17, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. The recreation lands coverage is a single county wide coverage containing recreation land and educational institution information compiled from several sources including: the State of Michigan, Oakland County Parks & Recreation, Oakland County cities, villages, and townships (CVTs), school districts, and the Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority (HCMA). Polygons of the parcels are used to represent the recreation/education lands. The hard copy source formats included listings, maps, and aerial photography. Key attributes include: Name, Agency, Acres, and various activities associated with the feature.

  12. D

    Access Oakland Account Services

    • detroitdata.org
    Updated Oct 31, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2016). Access Oakland Account Services [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/access-oakland-account-services1
    Explore at:
    arcgis geoservices rest api, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 31, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Oakland County
    Description

    Access Oakland Account Services provides secure account access and management for a variety of Oakland County Applications, including:

    • Property Gateway: is a leading-edge Internet tool built to provide free and fee-based online access to Oakland County's land and property information including tax parcel reports and maps. If you are a business and wish to use Property Gateway on a regular basis, you can request an Access Oakland business account by clicking the button at the top right corner of this page. Please note that you do not need to establish a business account for one-time use Property Gateway.
    • Pay Local Taxes: is a service provided by the Oakland County Treasurer to assist local governments within Oakland County in accepting tax payments online.
    • G2G Cloud Solutions: is an initiative of Oakland County that allows government agencies to take credit card payments at the counter or online.
    • CLEMIS Citations: provides a service to the public in an effort to make paying tickets more convenient by allowing participating Police Departments and District Courts the ability for citizens to pay Civil Infraction and Misdemeanor tickets online.
    • Court Recurring Payments: provides collections through recurring payments for Admin, Circuit Court and Family Court.
    • Survey Oakland: is subscription-based application that licensed surveyors and related professionals can use to view section corners (with dossiers for peer-approved remounted corners), NGS control, unrecorded surveys, property controlling corners, and scanned original survey/site plans for condos (Exhibit Bs), along with other related spatial data.

  13. f

    OC PSAP Boundary

    • data.ferndalemi.gov
    • detroitdata.org
    • +5more
    Updated Jun 6, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2017). OC PSAP Boundary [Dataset]. https://data.ferndalemi.gov/datasets/oakgov::oc-psap-boundary/geoservice
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 6, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. The primary function for these features is to display for 911 the public service answering points (PSAPs). Polygon features represent the the real world PSAPs. The PSAP's boundaries are a representation of the Municipal boundaries created for CLEMIS agencies. The key attributes are the CVT (City, Village, or Township) the PSAP falls in and the PSAP receiving the 911 call.

  14. D

    Halloween Light Display 2018

    • detroitdata.org
    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Oct 14, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2020). Halloween Light Display 2018 [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/halloween-light-display-20181
    Explore at:
    arcgis geoservices rest api, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 14, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Description

    A web-mapping application to explore Halloween Light Displays submitted by other residents of Oakland County. One can also find a link to the user-submission to get your own light display featured on our map!


    Terms & Conditions for Light Display Location Submission
    I am submitting a photo of my own property, and I acknowledge that I have the right to share this photo. I am aware that submitting a photo may encourage people to visit my property. I further acknowledge that this photo may be shared on Oakland County's digital media channels.

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE.

  15. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Oakland County, Michigan (2013). Property Gateway [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/oakgov::property-gateway

Property Gateway

Explore at:
31 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Apr 23, 2013
Dataset authored and provided by
Oakland County, Michigan
Description

Oakland County's public-facing parcel viewer. Oakland County staff and CVTs can request free accounts by contacting the Oakland County Service Center (servicecenter@oakgov.com, 248-858-8812). More information about the products available in Property Gateway can be found here: https://www.oakgov.com/propertygateway/Pages/default.aspx.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu