This survey shows the Job approval rating of president Barack Obama in the United States from January to June 2012, by state. Obama gets the highest approval rating from citizens in the District of Columbia (83 percent) and Hawaii (63 percent).Further data on Barack Obama's job approval rating can be found here.

Historical Dataset of President Barack Obama Elementary School is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (1990-2023),Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (1991-2023),Distribution of Students By Grade Trends,Student-Teacher Ratio Comparison Over Years (1991-2023),Asian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (1992-2023),Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (1992-2023),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (1992-2023),White Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (1992-2023),Two or More Races Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2019-2023),Diversity Score Comparison Over Years (1992-2023),Free Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (1991-2023),Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2002-2023),Reading and Language Arts Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2011-2022),Math Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2011-2022),Science Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2021-2022),Overall School Rank Trends Over Years (2011-2022)

The survey shows the public approval towards president Obama regarding important national issues. The poll was done on April 5 to 8, 2012. 44 percent of the respondents approved his handling with the topic economy, while 54 percent disapproved and 2 percent had no opinion.

The Public Papers of the Presidents, which is compiled and published by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, began in 1957 in response to a recommendation of the National Historical Publications Commission. Noting the lack of uniform compilations of messages and papers of the Presidents before this time, the Commission recommended the establishment of an official series in which Presidential writings, addresses, and remarks of a public nature could be made available.

Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Obama Foundation

This dataset provides information about the number of properties, residents, and average property values for Barack Obama Avenue cross streets in Ruleville, MS.

The above is a data set that compares Trump's and Obama's presidency in USA

This survey shows the average job approval ratings of U.S. presidents since World War II from Truman to Obama. As of January 2017, Barack Obama had an average approval rating of **** percent throughout his tenure.

This folder contains data behind the story Obama Granted Clemency Unlike Any Other President In History.

The data in obama_commutations.csv is copied from the Justice Department website. The python ...

Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Barack Obama Green Charter School Inc.

Do Democrats and Republicans appeal to different sets of moral foundations in their national convention speeches? Do they make efforts to frame their messages so that it is attractive to their base and moderate voters? This study examines the moral appeals that political elites use to communicate to their supporters. I analyze speeches starting from the 2008 to the 2020 Republican and Democrat National Conventions to see if there are differences in appeals to Harm, Fairness, Ingroup, Authority and Purity, which are tenets of the Moral Foundations Theory. I find that Republicans are more likely to appeal to Authority, and in 2020, Purity, while Democrats appeal mostly to Harm. Using qualitative content analyses, we see that both parties apply the moral language favored by the other side in their convention speeches on top of making appeals to moral foundations that are favored by their own base.

Did the 2008 United States presidential election produce stronger future mobilization for Blacks than non-Blacks? First-time voting influences long-term political behavior, but do minority voters see the most powerful effects when the formative election is tied to their group's political empowerment? I test this hypothesis in the context of the election of the first Black president in United States history, using voting eligibility discontinuities to identify the effect of voting in 2008 on future voting for Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites. Voting in 2008 caused a greater increase in the likelihood of voting in 2010 for Blacks than for other new voters, but there is no evidence of a sustained mobilizing advantage in subsequent elections. Furthermore, 2008 was not a unique formative voting experience for new Black voters, but rather produced similar effects on future voting as other presidential elections. These results signal that group political empowerment does not drive habitual voting.

This statistic provides a breakdown of the differences between the Obama and Trump administrations in regards to the composition of their White House staff in terms of salaries and numbers, as of *********. The Trump administration had ** White House staff earning more than ******* U.S. dollars per year. The corresponding figure for the Obama administration was **.

Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Obama Biden Transition Project Inc

Obama City(Obama Shi)'s Woodland area is 19,083[ha] which is the 458th highest in Japan (by City). It also ranks 6th in Fukui Prefecture, with 6.15% share of the entire Fukui. Transition Graphs and Comparison chart between Obama City and Mima City(Tokushima) and Tainai City(Niigata)(Closest City in Population) are available. Various data can be downloaded and output in csv format for use in EXCEL free of charge.

Historical Dataset of Barack Obama Charter is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (2019-2023),Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (2019-2023),Distribution of Students By Grade Trends,Student-Teacher Ratio Comparison Over Years (2019-2023),Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2019-2023),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2019-2023),Two or More Races Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2019-2023),Diversity Score Comparison Over Years (2019-2023),Free Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2019-2023),Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2019-2023),Reading and Language Arts Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2019-2022),Math Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2019-2022),Overall School Rank Trends Over Years (2019-2022)

Population dynamics and the way abundance fluctuates over time may be key determinants of the invasion success of an introduced species. Fine-scale temporal monitoring of invasive species is rarely carried out due to the difficulties in collecting data regularly and over a long period. Thanks to the collaboration of an amateur naturalist, a unique dataset on the abundance of the invasive land flatworm Obama nungara was obtained during a four-year survey of a French private garden, where up to 1585 O. nungara were recorded in one month. Daily monitoring data revealed high population size fluctuations that may be explained by meteorological factors as well as intra- and inter-specific interactions. Bayesian modelling confirmed that O. nungara’s abundance fluctuates depending on temperature, humidity and precipitation. Population growth seems to be favoured by mild winters and precipitation while it is disadvantaged by drought. These exogenous factors affect both directly this species, which is sensitive to desiccation, and indirectly since they are known to affect the populations of its prey (earthworms and terrestrial gastropods). We also suggested the important resilience of O. nungara population in this site, which was able to recover from a drastic demographic bottleneck due to a severe drought, as well to systematic removal by the owner of the site. These findings highlight the potentially high invasiveness of O. nungara and raise concerns regarding the strong threat that these invasive flatworms represent for the populations of its prey.

This special topic poll, fielded September 10, 2009, re-interviewed 648 adults first surveyed August 27-31 2009. This continuing series of monthly surveys solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. The dataset includes their responses to call-back questions as well as to selected questions in the original poll (ICPSR 27803) which asked whether they approved of the way Barack Obama was handling the presidency, the war in Afghanistan, health care, and the economy. Several questions addressed health care, including whether respondents thought the health care system in the United States worked well, whether Medicare worked well, and whether the government would do a better job than private health care companies in keeping health care costs down and providing medical coverage. Respondents were also asked their opinions on whether President Obama's proposals for reform would increase competition in the private insurance market, the health insurance industry, whether they believed in the possibility of expanding health care coverage without increasing budget deficits or taxes on the middle class, whether President Obama or the Republicans in Congress had better ideas about reforming the health care system, and whether they understood the health care reforms that Congress was considering. Whether President Obama's proposals for reform would increase competition in the private insurance market, whether the health care reform proposed by President Obama would make health care better in the United States and would help the respondent personally, and whether respondents favored the ideas of requiring all Americans to buy health insurance and the government offering everyone a government administered health insurance plan. Information was collected on how respondents thought health care reforms under consideration in Congress would effect the middle class, senior citizens, small businesses, the respondent personally, their health care costs, and the quality of health care. Additional topics that were covered included the pullout of troops from Iraq, credit card debt, how the federal government should use taxpayer's money, personal finances, the best way to discourage obesity, terrorist attacks, the war in Afghanistan, the swine flu, and job security. Respondents were re-interviewed on September 10, 2009, and asked whether they approved of the way Barak Obama was handling health care, if they had listened to the president's address of September 9th, the clarity of his explanation in regard to reform, if they agreed with the proposed reforms, whether Congress would pass and President Obama would sign a bill reforming the system. Questions in regard to budget deficit, expanded health care, regulation of the health insurance industry were also asked. Demographic variables include sex, age, race, marital status, education level, household income, political party affiliation, political philosophy, perceived social class, religious preference, and voter registration status and participation history.

This statistic shows the job approval ratings of U.S. president Barack Obama, on a monthly basis during his time in office from 2009 to 2017. The survey is conducted doing telephone interviews among about 15,000 adults per month in the U.S. The graph shows the results for the monthly aggregate to depict an annual trend. About 47 percent of the American public approved of President Barack Obama's doings in September 2015.

Data and code for four studies: 1) MTurk Experiment; 2) Content Analysis of 2008 Political Ads; 3) 2012 ANES-EGSS Survey; 4) 2012 ANES Times Series Survey