The global Fire and Gas Mapping Software market was valued at USD 216.1 million in 2025 and is expected to expand at a CAGR of XX% during the forecast period. The growth of this market is primarily driven by the increasing adoption of fire and gas detection systems, stringent government regulations, and the rising demand for enhanced safety measures in industrial facilities. The market is segmented based on type (cloud-based, on-premise), application (oil and gas, chemical, pharmaceutical, power, others), and region (North America, South America, Europe, Middle East & Africa, Asia Pacific). The cloud-based segment is expected to experience significant growth due to its cost-effectiveness, scalability, and ease of deployment. The oil and gas segment is expected to remain the dominant application segment, driven by the increasing demand for fire and gas mapping software in offshore and onshore drilling operations. Additionally, growing concerns about workplace safety and regulatory compliance are expected to drive demand for fire and gas mapping software in other industries such as chemical, pharmaceutical, and power.

The global Fire and Gas Mapping Software market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $147.1 million in 2025 and maintain a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.6% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by increasing regulatory compliance requirements across industries like oil and gas, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals, mandating comprehensive fire and gas risk assessments. Furthermore, advancements in software capabilities, including enhanced visualization tools, improved data analytics, and cloud-based deployment options, are significantly boosting market adoption. The demand for efficient and reliable solutions to manage complex safety protocols is a key factor propelling this growth. The market is segmented by deployment type (cloud-based and on-premise) and industry application, with oil and gas currently dominating, followed by the chemical and pharmaceutical sectors. Growth in the cloud-based segment is expected to outpace on-premise solutions due to its scalability, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. While the high initial investment for software implementation might pose a restraint in some sectors, the long-term benefits in terms of improved safety, reduced operational costs, and enhanced regulatory compliance are overcoming this hurdle, driving continued market expansion. The competitive landscape comprises both established players and emerging technology providers. Key vendors are focusing on developing innovative features and strategic partnerships to gain a competitive edge. Geographical expansion is also a critical element, with North America currently holding a significant market share, driven by stringent safety regulations and a strong industrial presence. However, growth in regions like Asia Pacific is expected to accelerate, fueled by increasing industrialization and a growing focus on workplace safety. This dynamic interplay of technological advancements, regulatory mandates, and regional growth patterns promises to sustain the upward trajectory of the Fire and Gas Mapping Software market in the foreseeable future.

Fire And Gas Mapping Software Market Outlook

The global fire and gas mapping software market size was estimated to be USD 800 million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 1,600 million by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.4% from 2024 to 2032. The market's growth is primarily driven by the increasing need for advanced safety systems in industrial sectors, stringent regulatory requirements, and advancements in technology.

One of the primary growth factors for the fire and gas mapping software market is the heightened awareness and need for safety measures in the industrial sector. Industries such as oil and gas, chemical, and power generation are particularly susceptible to fire and gas hazards, making the adoption of advanced safety software crucial. The software helps in identifying potential fire and gas leak points, thereby enabling timely interventions and mitigating risks, which is crucial for protecting both human life and assets.

Another significant factor driving the market is the stringent regulations imposed by governments and international bodies regarding workplace safety. Compliance with these regulations often mandates the use of sophisticated fire and gas detection and mapping systems. These regulations are particularly stringent in regions such as North America and Europe, where industrial safety standards are exceptionally high. Companies are therefore investing heavily in fire and gas mapping software to ensure compliance and avoid penalties, which is boosting market growth.

Technological advancements are also playing a crucial role in the growth of this market. Innovations such as the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in fire and gas mapping software are enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of these systems. AI and ML algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data in real-time, providing predictive analytics and early warning systems, which are invaluable for preventing incidents before they escalate. The advent of cloud-based solutions has further facilitated the adoption of these advanced systems by providing scalable and cost-effective options.

Regionally, North America dominates the fire and gas mapping software market due to its robust industrial sector and stringent safety regulations. However, rapid industrialization and urbanization in the Asia Pacific region are expected to drive significant growth in this market over the forecast period. The increasing adoption of industrial safety measures in countries like China and India, coupled with government initiatives aimed at improving workplace safety, are key factors contributing to the market's expansion in this region.

Component Analysis

When analyzing the fire and gas mapping software market by component, it becomes clear that the segment can be divided into software and services. The software segment encompasses specialized programs designed to detect, map, and manage fire and gas hazards within various environments. These programs are crucial in industries such as oil and gas, chemical, and power generation, where the risk of fire and gas leaks is significantly high. The software is often equipped with advanced algorithms and analytics capabilities, allowing for real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance, which are essential for ensuring safety and operational efficiency.

The services segment, on the other hand, includes a range of offerings such as installation, maintenance, training, and consultancy services. These services are vital for the effective implementation and ongoing management of fire and gas mapping systems. Installation services ensure that the software is correctly set up and integrated with existing safety systems, while maintenance services are crucial for keeping the software updated and functional. Training services help users understand how to operate the software effectively, and consultancy services offer expert advice on optimizing safety measures within a facility.

The software segment is expected to hold a larger share of the market due to the increasing demand for advanced and automated safety solutions. The ability of modern software to integrate with other systems, provide real-time data, and offer predictive analytics makes it an attractive option for industries looking to enhance their safety measures. Furthermore, the trend towards digitalization and the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies are driving the growth of the software segment.

However, the services segment is also anticipated to experience substantial growth.

Various map tools from Oil Conservation Division (OCD) of EMNRD.

The Fire and Gas Mapping Software market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $216.1 million in 2025. While the provided CAGR is missing, considering the increasing adoption of digitalization in hazardous industries like oil and gas, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals, a conservative estimate would place the CAGR between 8% and 12% for the forecast period (2025-2033). This growth is driven by stringent safety regulations, the need for enhanced risk mitigation, and the increasing complexity of industrial facilities. The cloud-based segment is expected to witness faster growth compared to on-premise solutions due to its scalability, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. Key applications driving market expansion include oil and gas, followed by the chemical and pharmaceutical sectors. North America and Europe currently hold the largest market share, but the Asia-Pacific region is projected to exhibit significant growth potential over the forecast period, fueled by increasing industrialization and infrastructure development in countries like China and India. The market faces certain restraints, primarily related to the initial investment costs associated with software implementation and the need for specialized expertise to effectively utilize these sophisticated systems. However, the long-term benefits in terms of safety and operational efficiency outweigh these challenges, further propelling market growth. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established players and emerging technology providers. Companies like Micropack, Insight Numerics, Kenexis, BakerRisk, MSA Safety, MES, ESR Technology, and Protex Systems are actively contributing to market innovation, offering diverse solutions tailored to specific industry needs. The future of the Fire and Gas Mapping Software market hinges on the development of advanced analytics capabilities, integration with IoT devices for real-time monitoring, and the adoption of artificial intelligence for predictive maintenance and risk assessment. This will lead to more sophisticated and proactive safety management, ultimately enhancing operational efficiency and reducing the risk of accidents in high-hazard environments.

An Oil and Gas Location is a DEP primary facility type related to the Oil & Gas Program. The sub-facility types related to Oil and Gas that are included in this layer are:_ Land Application -- An area where drilling cuttings or waste are disposed by land application Well-- A well associated with oil and/or gas production Pit -- An approved pit that is used for storage of oil and gas well fluids . Some sub facility types are not included in this layer due to security policies.

This geographic information system combines detailed information and location coordinates for oil wells, gas wells, and pipelines from the Commission's files with base map data captured from U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute quadrangle maps. These interactive maps were developed using Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI) ArcIMS software, and interface with the Commission's Production Data Query and Drilling Permit Query applications.

These maps and database are an update of the Ohio Division of Geological Survey (ODGS) oil and gas fields Digital Chart and Map Series (DCMS 13 through 21), which was completed in 1996. Previous Ohio oil and gas fields maps were also published in 1948, 1953, 1960, 1964, and 1974. The updated maps and database have been created using the GIS-based ESRI/ARCMAP software. All documented oil and gas pools/fields have been digitized as polygons and each polygon is linked to a unique pool/field identification (ID) number and name. Like the previous DCMS oil and gas fields maps, the updated oil and gas pools/fields have been grouped into 8 major plays defined by specific stratigraphic intervals. These are the 1) Pennsylvanian undifferentiated sandstones and coals, 2) Mississippian undifferentiated sandstones (excluding the Berea and Cussewago Sandstone) and Maxville Limestone, 3) Mississippian Berea and Cussewago sandstones), 4) Upper Devonian Ohio Shale and siltstones, 5) Silurian/Devonian Big Lime interval (Onondaga Limestone, Oriskany Sandstone, Bass Islands Dolomite, Salina Group, and Lockport Dolomite), 6) Silurian Cataract/ Medina sandstone (Clinton/Medina) and Dayton Formation (Packer Shell), 7) Middle Ordovician fractured shale, Trenton Limestone and Black River Group and Wells Creek Formation, and 8) Cambrian-Ordovician Knox Dolomite (Beekmantown dolomite, Rose Run sandstone, Copper Ridge dolomite, B-zone, and Krysik sandstone). All oil and gas pool/field ID's are defined and grouped by play and not geographic boundary, since most of the producing oil and gas reservoirs in Ohio occur within stratigraphic traps. This is a departure from the method used in the 1974 map in which oil and gas fields were assigned geographically, and not by producing horizon. Thus on the 1974 map, one field could contain multiple, stacked, partially overlapping, producing horizons from the Cambrian to the Pennsylvanian. Since the 1974 map was produced, over 58,000 additional wells have been drilled and completed in multiple, stacked producing horizons, mostly in unique stratigraphic traps. This has made it too cumbersome to assign all producing horizons to the same pool/field ID within any given geographic area. Assignment of pool/field ID's by play or stratigraphic interval provides a better geologic method of displaying and defining these pools/fields that are dominantly stratigraphic traps. With this method of outlining polygons for producing horizons, a pool is defined as a single polygon that produces from horizons within one play. When more than one polygon is assigned the same ID within the same play, these polygons are defined as a field. Pool/field production types are displayed as gas (red), oil (green), or storage (orange). In most cases, the assignment of production type was determined from the 1974 Ohio oil and gas field map. For updates to the 1974 map, the production type (excluding the Knox Dolomite play) was determined by the dominance of oil or gas symbol as displayed on the township well spot maps. In many cases a subjective decision was made, since many of the wells are displayed as combination oil and gas. With the Knox Dolomite play, the production type was based on gas-to-oil ratio (GOR) using data from the ODGS production database POGO (Production of Oil and Gas in Ohio). Oil production is shown for pools/fields with a GOR less than 5,000, and gas for fields with a GOR greater than 5,000. Calculations are based on cumulative production since 1984. This method of using GOR was not possible for the other, older historical plays because of insufficient production data. Whenever possible, existing outlines from the 1996 digital oil and gas fields maps were used. Exceptions to this are in areas where the 1996-pool/field boundaries were modified or new pool/field boundaries were created from additional drilling. Pool/field boundaries were digitized based upon documented wells from the ODGS township well spot maps, and in some areas from the Ohio Fuel Gas (OFG) well spot maps. The OFG maps were used primarily for the Pennsylvanian and Mississippian plays because many of these older wells are not located on the ODGS township well spot maps. In some areas, digitized pools/fields from the 1996 version were deleted if the oil and gas township and/or the OFG maps or well cards could not verify them. A minimum of 3 producing wells within a 1-mile distance was required to draw a pool/field outline. Storage field outlines are approximate and are based primarily on the 1974 map. In drawing new polygons for pool/field boundaries, a buffer of 1/2 mile was made around each producing well, and boundaries were drawn using these buffers. In assigning pool/field ID's, the historical numbers and names from the 1974 map were maintained whenever possible. Pools/fields may be consolidated into a larger consolidated field only if they occur within the same play. When two or more pools/fields are consolidated, they were assigned a new field ID. The name of the consolidated field was taken from the oldest pool/field within the consolidated field. There may be exceptions to this if the name is firmly entrenched in literature (i.e., Canton Consolidated, East Canton Consolidated, etc.). In a given geographic area of multiple producing horizons, the same ID was maintained for the dominant producing horizon. The less dominant producing horizons in other plays for this geographic area were assigned new pool/field ID's. Every pool/field with an assigned number has also been assigned a unique name. If it is a new pool/field ID that was not on the 1974 map, a new name was assigned using the nearest place name (i.e., town, village, city, etc.) or a named geographic feature (i.e., stream, river, ridge, etc.) from a topographic map.

Maps depicting gas production, shale plays, oil plays, coalbed methane fields, and other data. Maps were developed by GIS software and are in downloadable PDF and JPG format. Maps cover the lower 48 states.

This map was created as part of a worldwide series of geologic maps for the U.S. Geological Survey's World Energy Project. These products are available on CD-ROM and the Internet. The goal of the project is to assess the undiscovered, technically recoverable oil and gas resources of the world. Two previously published digital geologic data sets (U.S. and Caribbean) were clipped to the map extent, while the dataset for Mexico was digitized for this project. Original attributes for all data layers were maintained, and in some cases, graphically merged with common symbology for presentation purposes. The world has been divided into geologic provinces that are used for allocation and prioritization of oil and gas assessments. For the World Energy Project, a subset of those provinces is shown on this map. Each province has a set of geologic characteristics that distinguish it from surrounding provinces. These characteristics may include dominant lithologies, the age of the strata, and/or structural type. The World Geographic Coordinate System of 1984 is used for data storage, and the data are presented in a Lambert Conformal Conic Projection on the OFR 97-470-L map product. Other details about the map compilation and data sources are provided in metadata documents in the data section on this CD-ROM. Several software packages were used to create this map including: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI) ArcGIS 8.3, ArcInfo software, Adobe Photoshop CS, Illustrator CS, and Acrobat 6.0. Tips

Snapshot img

Fire and Gas Detection System Market Size 2024-2028

The fire and gas detection system market is estimated to grow by USD 2.32 billion between 2023 and 2028 at a CAGR of 3.2%. The market is experiencing significant growth, driven by several key factors. The increasing production of shale gas is one such factor, as the extraction process involves potential hazards that necessitate advanced detection systems. Another factor is the growing emphasis on worker safety across various industries, leading to a heightened focus on implementing robust safety measures. Furthermore, the number of industry safety performance standards is on the rise, making it mandatory for organizations to invest in reliable detection systems to ensure regulatory compliance.

What will be the Size of the Market During the Forecast Period?

To learn more about this report, Download Report Sample

Technavio’s Exclusive Market Customer Landscape

Our analysis of the adoption life cycle of the market indicates its movement between the innovator’s stage and the laggard’s stage. The report illustrates the lifecycle of the market, focusing on the adoption rates of the major countries. Technavio has included key purchase criteria, adoption rates, adoption lifecycles, and drivers of price sensitivity to help companies evaluate and develop growth strategies from 2023 to 2028.

Market Customer Landscape

Market Dynamics

The Market encompasses the sales, production, and installation of fire detection systems, including fire alarms, fire detectors, smoke detectors, and heat detectors. The market caters to various industries, primarily focusing on fireprone environments such as power utilities, mining, petrochemical industry, oil and gas exploration industry, and construction-related projects. Fire safety regulations mandate the use of reliable and efficient fire detection systems to minimize damage and loss of life. The Commercial segment dominates the market due to the large-scale infrastructure and the high risk of fire incidents. Residential applications are also growing due to increasing awareness and the availability of sustainable alarm and detection solutions made from recyclable and biodegradable materials like plant-based bioplastics and biodegradable polymers. Technological developments in integrated fire safety systems are driving market growth. The future of the Market lies in the adoption of advanced technologies and the implementation of stricter fire safety regulations. Our researchers studied the data for years, with 2023 as the base year and 2024 as the estimated year, and presented the key drivers, trends, and challenges for the market.

Key Market Driver

One of the key factors driving growth in the market is the rising production of shale gas. Due to the glut of supply, it introduced into the market, which eventually resulted in price drops, shale gas has altered the global structure of oil and gas energy. Unlike conventional petroleum gas, shale gas investigation transmits bigger measures of methane and consequently, has a higher ozone-depleting substance impression. CH4 isn't simply destructive to the climate but additionally a wellspring of blast risks.

Moreover, the rise in shale gas production from countries such as the US, Russia, Iran, Qatar, Canada, China, Norway, and Saudi Arabia has raised the scope for the adoption of gas detection products and solutions. Besides, the growing urge to minimize casualties and an increasing number of government mandates have given rise to the adoption of the latest safety tools in the shale gas manufacturing processes, to their functional benefits. Hence, increasing shale gas production will drive the global market during the forecast period.

Significant Market Trends

The advent of 3D fire and gas mapping tools is the primary trend in the global market. One of the most recent technological advancements in the field of safety instrumentation systems is the appearance of the software tool for 3D fire and gas mapping. The oil and gas, chemical, and petrochemical industries, among other end-user industries, are rapidly adopting this tool. The execution of the 3D fire and gas planning device in a modern arrangement helps streamline the number and area of F&G finders. A unit of United Technologies called Detector Electronics offers a 3D fire and gas mapping tool for industries that require a higher level of protection and safety.

Moreover, some key features offered by the 3D fire and gas mapping software are they are fully 3D flame and gas detection assessments, fully configurable and compliant with every oil and gas design methodology, and coverage optimization resulting in a safe and compliant fire and gas detection design. The results can be presented in 2D or 3D formats, whichever provides the most insight. Therefore, the implementation of the 3D fire and gas mapping tool in an industry helps in the optim

This map service is a one-stop location to view and explore Kentucky geologic map data and related-data (geologic outcrops, photos, and diagrams), Kentucky water wells and springs, Kentucky oil and gas wells. All features are provided by the Kentucky Geological Survey via ArcGIS Server services. This map service displays the 1:500,000-scale geologic map of Kentucky at scales smaller than 1:100,000, and 1:24,000-scale geological quadrangle data at larger scales. The 1:500,000-scale geologic map data were derived from the 1988 Geologic Map of Kentucky, which was compiled by Martin C. Noger (KGS) from the 1981 Geologic Map of Kentucky (Scale 1:250,000) by McDowell and others (USGS). The 1:24,000-scale geologic map data and the fault data were compiled from 707 Geological Survey 7.5-minute geologic quadrangle maps, which were digitized during the Kentucky Geological Survey Digital Mapping Program (1996-2006).The basemap data is provided via ArcGIS Server services hosted by the Kentucky Office of Geographic Information.Some tools are provided to help explore the map data:- Query tool: use this tool to search on the KGS database of lithologic descriptions. Most descriptions are derived from the 707 1:24,000 geological quadrangle maps. Once a search is completed, every unit that contains the search parameters is highlighted on the map service.- ID tools: users can identify and get detailed info on geologic units and other map features using either the point, area, or buffer identification tools.A few notes on this service:- the legend is dynamic for the viewed extent. It is provided via a database call using the current map extent.- the oil and gas and water wells are ArcGIS Server services that update dynamically from the KGS database.- the geologic map and faults are dynamic ArcGIS Server map services.- the user can link to other geologic data for the viewed extent using the links provided in the "Geologic Info" tab.- you can query the entire KGS lithologic description database and highlight the relevant geologic units based on the query.

"This report contains maps and associated spatial data showing historical oil and gas exploration and production in the United States. Because of the proprietary nature of many oil and gas well databases, the United States was divided into cells one-quarter square mile and the production status of all wells in a given cell was aggregated. Base-map reference data are included, using the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Map, the USGS and American Geological Institute (AGI) Global GIS, and a World Shaded Relief map service from the ESRI Geography Network. A hardcopy map was created to synthesize recorded exploration data from 1859, when the first oil well was drilled in the U.S., to 2005. In addition to the hardcopy map product, the data have been refined and made more accessible through the use of Geographic Information System (GIS) tools. The cell data are included in a GIS database constructed for spatial analysis via the USGS Internet Map Service or by importing the data into GIS software such as ArcGIS. The USGS internet map service provides a number of useful and sophisticated geoprocessing and cartographic functions via an internet browser. Also included is a video clip of U.S. oil and gas exploration and production through time."

The Oil And Gas Data Management Software market report offers a thorough competitive analysis, mapping key players’ strategies, market share, and business models. It provides insights into competitor dynamics, helping companies align their strategies with the current market landscape and future trends.

This GIS layer consists of oil and gas field approximate center point locations (approximately 1,800). Oil and gas fields not assigned a center point by the DNR Office of Conservation will not appear on the map. These points are manually placed into the database as allowing the software to automatically plot the geocenters of the fields may place the point outside the field due to the odd shapes of many of the fields. These data are updated weekly. This oil and gas field approximate centerpoint dataset was processed on January 31, 2007 for the Louisiana 2007 GIS DVD from the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (LDNR) Oracle database/ESRI SDE oil/gas fields file. These data are updated weekly and can be downloaded from the LDNR oil/gas well download site - http://sonris-gis.dnr.state.la.us/website/DownloadLogin.html . Detailed information from the DNR Oracle database for fields can be accessed at LDNR's SONRIS web page (www.sonris.com) in the Office of Conservation Reports - Codes and Lookup Tables.

Snapshot img

Oil And Gas Pipeline Market Size 2025-2029

The oil and gas pipeline market size is forecast to increase by USD 65.9 billion, at a CAGR of 4.6% between 2024 and 2029.

The market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the rising global energy consumption and technological advances in pipeline inspection. These advancements enable more efficient and effective maintenance, ensuring the reliability and safety of pipelines. However, the market faces challenges due to the volatility in crude oil prices, which can restrain oil and gas supply and impact the profitability of pipeline operators.
Companies in the market must navigate these challenges and leverage technological innovations to optimize operations, enhance safety, and maintain competitiveness. As energy demand continues to increase, particularly in emerging economies, the need for secure and efficient pipeline infrastructure becomes increasingly crucial. Leak detection technology and data acquisition systems enable swift response to potential issues, minimizing downtime and environmental impact.

What will be the Size of the Oil And Gas Pipeline Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free Sample

The market continues to evolve, with ongoing advancements in technology shaping its landscape. One such development is the integration of SCADA systems with corrosion monitoring systems, enabling real-time data analysis and proactive pipeline maintenance. Gas pipeline compression, facilitated by pipeline compression stations, ensures consistent delivery of natural gas to end-users, even during periods of peak demand. Pipeline maintenance scheduling, facilitated by pipeline integrity surveys and pressure drop calculation, ensures the longevity and safety of these critical infrastructure assets. For instance, a major pipeline operator successfully increased its sales by 8% through the implementation of advanced pipeline automation systems and leak detection technology.

Smart pipeline technology, including pipeline automation systems and remote monitoring solutions, offers enhanced efficiency and reduced operational costs. Pipeline safety regulations mandate the implementation of cathodic protection systems and third-party damage prevention measures, safeguarding against external threats and corrosion. Pipeline rehabilitation techniques, such as pipeline decommissioning processes and pipeline welding techniques, ensure the continued viability of aging pipelines. Underground pipeline mapping and pigging operations, utilizing in-line inspection tools, provide essential data for pipeline network management and infrastructure upgrades. According to industry reports, the market is expected to grow by over 5% annually, driven by increasing energy demand and technological advancements.

How is this Oil And Gas Pipeline Industry segmented?

The oil and gas pipeline industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Application

  Onshore
  Offshore


Type

  Gas
  Oil


End-user

  Industrial
  Residential
  Commercial


Geography

  North America

    US


  Europe

    France
    Germany
    Russia
    UK


  APAC

    China
    India
    Japan
    South Korea


  South America

    Brazil


  Rest of World (ROW)

By Application Insights

The Onshore segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. Onshore oil and gas pipelines play a pivotal role in transporting hydrocarbons from drilling sites to various destinations, catering to the growing energy demands. The integration of advanced technologies in pipeline infrastructure enhances operational efficiency and safety. For instance, corrosion monitoring systems ensure pipeline integrity by detecting and preventing corrosion, saving an estimated USD1 billion annually in the US. SCADA system integration enables real-time pipeline monitoring, reducing response time to potential issues. Gas pipeline compression increases throughput, while pipeline simulation software optimizes operational performance. Pipeline maintenance scheduling, network design, and integrity surveys are crucial for preventing pressure drops and mitigating third-party damage. Pipeline network design and simulation software play a crucial role in optimizing pipeline capacity, with pipeline hydraulic modeling and flow rate measurement providing valuable insights.

Remote monitoring solutions and cathodic protection systems minimize human intervention and improve safety. Pipeline decommissioning processes and rehabilitation techniques extend pipeline life. Hydraulic modeling, risk assessment, and weldin

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Devils Tower National Monument Area, Wyoming is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (dtnm_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (dtnm_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (dtnm_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (deto_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (deto_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (dtnm_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the deto_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Wyoming State Geological Survey and U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (dtnm_geology_metadata.txt or dtnm_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:100,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 50.8 meters or 166.7 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

These maps and database are an update of the Ohio Division of Geological Survey (ODGS) oil and gas fields Digital Chart and Map Series (DCMS 13 through 21), which was completed in 1996. Previous Ohio oil and gas fields maps were also published in 1948, 1953, 1960, 1964, and 1974. The updated maps and database have been created using the GIS-based ESRI/ARCMAP software. All documented oil and gas pools/fields have been digitized as polygons and each polygon is linked to a unique pool/field identification (ID) number and name. Like the previous DCMS oil and gas fields maps, the updated oil and gas pools/fields have been grouped into 8 major plays defined by specific stratigraphic intervals. These are the 1) Pennsylvanian undifferentiated sandstones and coals, 2) Mississippian undifferentiated sandstones (excluding the Berea and Cussewago Sandstone) and Maxville Limestone, 3) Mississippian Berea and Cussewago sandstones), 4) Upper Devonian Ohio Shale and siltstones, 5) Silurian/Devonian "Big Lime" interval (Onondaga Limestone, Oriskany Sandstone, Bass Islands Dolomite, Salina Group, and Lockport Dolomite), 6) Silurian Cataract/ Medina sandstone ("Clinton"/"Medina") and Dayton Formation (Packer Shell"), 7) Middle Ordovician fractured shale, Trenton Limestone and Black River Group and Wells Creek Formation, and 8) Cambrian-Ordovician Knox Dolomite (Beekmantown dolomite, Rose Run sandstone, Copper Ridge dolomite, "B-zone", and Krysik sandstone). All oil and gas pool/field ID's are defined and grouped by play and not geographic boundary, since most of the producing oil and gas reservoirs in Ohio occur within stratigraphic traps. This is a departure from the method used in the 1974 map in which oil and gas fields were assigned geographically, and not by producing horizon. Thus on the 1974 map, one field could contain multiple, stacked, partially overlapping, producing horizons from the Cambrian to the Pennsylvanian. Since the 1974 map was produced, over 58,000 additional wells have been drilled and completed in multiple, stacked producing horizons, mostly in unique stratigraphic traps. This has made it too cumbersome to assign all producing horizons to the same pool/field ID within any given geographic area. Assignment of pool/field ID's by play or stratigraphic interval provides a better geologic method of displaying and defining these pools/fields that are dominantly stratigraphic traps. With this method of outlining polygons for producing horizons, a "pool" is defined as a single polygon that produces from horizons within one play. When more than one polygon is assigned the same ID within the same play, these polygons are defined as a "field." Pool/field production types are displayed as gas (red), oil (green), or storage (orange). In most cases, the assignment of production type was determined from the 1974 Ohio oil and gas field map. For updates to the 1974 map, the production type (excluding the Knox Dolomite play) was determined by the dominance of oil or gas symbol as displayed on the township well spot maps. In many cases a subjective decision was made, since many of the wells are displayed as combination oil and gas. With the Knox Dolomite play, the production type was based on gas-to-oil ratio (GOR) using data from the ODGS production database POGO (Production of Oil and Gas in Ohio). Oil production is shown for pools/fields with a GOR less than 5,000, and gas for fields with a GOR greater than 5,000. Calculations are based on cumulative production since 1984. This method of using GOR was not possible for the other, older historical plays because of insufficient production data. Whenever possible, existing outlines from the 1996 digital oil and gas fields maps were used. Exceptions to this are in areas where the 1996-pool/field boundaries were modified or new pool/field boundaries were created from additional drilling. Pool/field boundaries were digitized based upon documented wells from the ODGS township well spot maps, and in some areas from the Ohio Fuel Gas (OFG) well spot maps. The OFG maps were used primarily for the Pennsylvanian and Mississippian plays because many of these older wells are not located on the ODGS township well spot maps. In some areas, digitized pools/fields from the 1996 version were deleted if the oil and gas township and/or the OFG maps or well cards could not verify them. A minimum of 3 producing wells within a 1-mile distance was required to draw a pool/field outline. Storage field outlines are approximate and are based primarily on the 1974 map. In drawing new polygons for pool/field boundaries, a buffer of 1/2 mile was made around each producing well, and boundaries were drawn using these buffers. In assigning pool/field ID's, the historical numbers and names from the 1974 map were maintained whenever possible. Pools/fields may be consolidated into a larger consolidated field only if they occur within the same play. When two or more pools/fields are consolidated, they were assigned a new field ID. The name of the consolidated field was taken from the oldest pool/field within the consolidated field. There may be exceptions to this if the name is firmly entrenched in literature (i.e., Canton Consolidated, East Canton Consolidated, etc.). In a given geographic area of multiple producing horizons, the same ID was maintained for the dominant producing horizon. The less dominant producing horizons in other plays for this geographic area were assigned new pool/field ID's. Every pool/field with an assigned number has also been assigned a unique name. If it is a new pool/field ID that was not on the 1974 map, a new name was assigned using the nearest place name (i.e., town, village, city, etc.) or a named geographic feature (i.e., stream, river, ridge, etc.) from a topographic map.

The global geophysical surveying and mapping services market is projected to reach USD 17,595.9 million by 2033, with a CAGR of 4.6% from 2025 to 2033. The growth of the market is primarily driven by the increasing demand for oil and gas exploration and production, coupled with the rising awareness of the need for mineral resources for sustainable development. Technological advancements, such as the development of advanced sensors and data processing techniques, are also contributing to the growth of the market. In terms of segments, the oil and gas application segment held the largest market share in 2025, accounting for over 40% of the total revenue. The segment is expected to maintain its dominance throughout the forecast period due to the increasing demand for oil and gas exploration and production. The minerals and mining application segment is also expected to witness significant growth during the forecast period, owing to the rising demand for mineral resources, such as copper, gold, and iron ore, for various industrial applications. North America is the largest market for geophysical surveying and mapping services, followed by Europe and Asia-Pacific. The presence of major oil and gas exploration and production companies in North America is a key factor driving the growth of the market in the region. Asia-Pacific is also expected to witness significant growth during the forecast period, due to the increasing demand for mineral resources and the growing construction industry in the region.