As of 2023, Indonesia had approximately 2.41 billion barrels worth of proven oil reserves, indicating an incline compared to the year prior. Oil has been a major sector in the Indonesian economy but has recently become less important due to its finite nature. Oil production Within Indonesia, considerable amounts of oil are found in the Sumatra, Borneo, Java, and West Papua regions. The main oil fields in Indonesia include the Rokan Block in Riau in Sumatra, previously operated by Chevron Pacific Indonesia. After decades, the US-based firm stopped its operations in Rokan Block in 2021, which was then taken over by Indonesia's state-owned oil and gas corporation PT Pertamina. In recent years, domestic consumption has continued to rise while production of oil has been falling. In 2022, Indonesia is also one of the highest oil consumers in the world. Oil shortageA country that was once one of the world's leading oil producers is now facing a shortage. Most of the unexplored oil and gas blocks are in Indonesia's under-developed Eastern regions, such as in Sulawesi, Kalimantan, and Papua. These areas lack necessary infrastructure, capital and other barriers to entry, making it even more expensive to pull new oil out of the ground. Without opening up new oilfields, the country would have depleted its oil reserves in a little over a decade. Due to the costs of opening up a new oil field, few companies are willing to invest in the long-term project.

Version: GOGI_V10_2This data was downloaded as a File Geodatabse from EDX at https://edx.netl.doe.gov/dataset/global-oil-gas-features-database. This data was developed using a combination of big data computing, custom search and data integration algorithms, and expert driven search to collect open oil and gas data resources worldwide. This approach identified over 380 data sets and integrated more than 4.8 million features into the GOGI database.Access the technical report describing how this database was produced using the following link: https://edx.netl.doe.gov/dataset/development-of-an-open-global-oil-and-gas-infrastructure-inventory-and-geodatabase” Acknowledgements: This work was funded under the Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC) Oil and Gas Methane Science Studies. The studies are managed by United Nations Environment in collaboration with the Office of the Chief Scientist, Steven Hamburg of the Environmental Defense Fund. Funding was provided by the Environmental Defense Fund, OGCI Companies (Shell, BP, ENI, Petrobras, Repsol, Total, Equinor, CNPC, Saudi Aramco, Exxon, Oxy, Chevron, Pemex) and CCAC.Link to SourcePoint of Contact: Jennifer Bauer email:jennifer.bauer@netl.doe.govMichael D Sabbatino email:michael.sabbatino@netl.doe.gov

Global oil reserves by country, 1990 - 2014

This map service displays present and past oil and gas production in the United States, as well as the location and intensity of exploratory drilling outside producing areas.

To construct this map, digital data were used from more than 3 million wells in IHS Inc.'s PI/Dwights PLUS Well Data on CD-ROM, current through 10/1/2005. In some areas, the PI/Dwights data tend not to be complete, particularly for pre-1920 production. IHS data was supplemented with state wells databases for Indiana, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Illinois, and Ohio, (current as of 2004 to 2006).

Because of the proprietary nature of many of these databases, the area of the United States was divided into cells one quarter-mile square and the production information of each well is aggregated in each cell. No proprietary data are displayed or included in the cell maps. The cells are coded to represent whether the wells included within the cell are predominantly oil-producing, gas-producing, both oil and gas-producing, or the type of production of the wells located within the cell is unknown or dry. The cell attributes also contain the latitude and longitude values of the center-cell coordinates.

The Oil and Gas Fields Map layer contains polygon representations of the boundaries of oil and gas fields in Kansas as defined by the Oil and Gas Nomenclature Committee. The Oil and Gas Fields dataset is maintained by the Kansas Geological Survey for research purposes and for use by citizens interested in the oil and gas resources of the state. The data is maintained and updated by the Kansas Geological Survey.This resource solely represent field boundary data. For a full mapping experience, please visit the Oil & Gas interactive map.For information on oil and gas field production, please see the KGS website- https://www.kgs.ku.edu/Magellan/Field/index.html

The Middle East accounts for the greatest share of proved oil reserves of any region in the world. As of 2024, the Middle East housed some **** percent of known oil reserves. In the past three decades, the Middle East’s share of global oil reserves dropped from nearly ** percent in 1960 to less than ** percent in 2020. This was mainly due to greater reserves discovered in the Americas and by 2023 Latin America’s share had almost *******. The regional distribution shifts The Middle East and Latin America are home to the two countries with the highest proven oil reserves worldwide - Venezuela and Saudi Arabia. Venezuela and Saudi Arabia are also among the founding members of OPEC, an organization currently comprised of 13 countries that produce around ** percent of total crude oil globally. In 2009, Venezuela confirmed significant oil discoveries, and in the span of just a few years, Central and South American proved oil reserves rose from *** to around *** billion barrels of crude oil. Venezuela announced in 2011 that its proven oil reserves had surpassed Saudi Arabia as the largest in the world. Most of these reserves are in the form of oil sands and other very heavy oil types.

Canada has significant proven reserves of crude oil (178 billion barrels), second only to those of Saudi Arabia. Canadian natural gas reserves were 58 trillion cubic feet as of year-end 2006. These resources are found in the country’s seven major sedimentary basins. The primary petroleum-producing sedimentary basin is the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB), which extends from the Canadian Shield to the Rocky Mountains through Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and northeastern British Columbia. There are also producing basins in southern Ontario, offshore Newfoundland, and the Scotian Shelf. Potential reserves are also found in Northern Canada, where an estimated 30 per cent of Canada’s conventional oil resources are located. The map shows the major petroleum-producing fields (or pools) of conventional natural gas, crude oil and the oil sands, as well as the extensive pipeline network.

This digital dataset is comprised of two separate data files that contain total dissolved solids, well construction, and well identifying information for 1,131 petroleum wells used to map salinity in and around 31 southern and central California oil fields. Salinity mapping was done for 27 fields located in the southern San Joaquin Valley of Kern County (North Belridge, South Belridge, Canfield Ranch, North Coles Levee, South Coles Levee, Cymric, Edison, Elk Hills, Fruitvale, Greeley, Jasmin, Kern Bluff, Kern Front, Kern River, Lost Hills, Mount Poso, Mountain View, Poso Creek, Rio Bravo, Rosedale, Rosedale Ranch, Round Mountain, San Emidio Nose, Tejon, Ten Section, Wheeler Ridge, and Yowlumne), 3 fields in the Los Angeles (LA) Basin of Los Angeles County (Montebello, Santa Fe Springs, and Wilmington), and 1 field in the central coast area of Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties (Santa Maria Valley). Only petroleum wells that were located within the administrative boundaries of these 31 fields were used for salinity mapping. The dataset includes total dissolved solids (TDS) analyses from 1930 to 2015. TDS data for each well varies from a single analysis to multiple analyses for different sample dates and (or) collected from different depths within the same well. For wells having multiple analyses TDS represents the median value. There are 159 wells in the dataset each having 2-4 TDS analyses, including 15 wells having TDS values from different depths. This dataset also includes ancillary data in the form of top perforation depth, land-surface elevation at the well head, and well location and identifier information. For petroleum wells missing top perforation depth (3 percent), the median top perforation depth for all wells within the field having top of perforation depth is provided as an approximation for the purpose of vertical plotting. Summary data about each well used for salinity mapping is contained in the file called Petroleum_Wells_Summary_Data. Detailed information about all individual TDS values including those used for determining median TDS values, are contained in the file called Petroleum_Wells_All_Data.

This time-enabled map shows global energy production and reserves by country from 1990 to 2014. Coal production, oil production, oil reserves, natural gas production, and natural gas reserves are shown.Unit Definitions:BBL = billion barrels of petroleum liquids (1 bbl = 42 million US gallons)TBPD = thousand barrels per dayTCF = trillion cubic feet (natural gas unit of volume)BCF = billion cubic feet (natural gas unit of volume)The data is sourced from the U.S. Energy Information Agency “International Energy Statistics” - www.eia.gov/beta/international.

description: 3 Files Volume 1 Central California.Volume 2 Southern, Central Coastal, and Offshore California. Volume 3 Northern California.Contour maps, cross section, data sheets and representative well logs for California oil and gas fields. This resource is available online for download as 3 pdfs. For more information see links provided; abstract: 3 Files Volume 1 Central California.Volume 2 Southern, Central Coastal, and Offshore California. Volume 3 Northern California.Contour maps, cross section, data sheets and representative well logs for California oil and gas fields. This resource is available online for download as 3 pdfs. For more information see links provided

This layer is a component of Overview Map for ILOIL Web Mapping Application.

© Illinois State Geological Survey

There are 487 onshore oil and gas fields in California encompassing 3,392 square miles of aggregated area. The California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) initiated a Regional Monitoring Program (RMP) in July 2015, intended to determine where and to what degree groundwater quality may be at potential risk to contamination related to oil and gas development activities including well stimulation, well integrity issues, produced water ponds, and underground injection. The first step in monitoring groundwater in and near oil and gas fields is to prioritize the 487 fields using consistent statewide analysis of available data that indicate potential risk of groundwater to oil and gas development. There were limited existing data on potential groundwater risk factors available for oil and gas fields across the state. During 2014-2016, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) extracted and compiled data from various sources, including the California Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) and the Department of Water Resources (DWR). Geospatial data from the DOGGR were used in the prioritization analysis. Dataset include geospatial data for 222,637 petroleum wells, administrative boundaries for 514 oil, gas, and geothermal fields, and boundaries for DOGGR's 6 juristictional districts. The data were downloaded from DOGGR's Geographic Information System (GIS) Mapping website at http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dog/maps. The DOGGR GIS Mapping website is periodally updated, and the datasets downloaded by the U.S. Geological Survey in 2014 may no longer be available on the DOGGR website.

This map is created by georeferencing the Middle East oil and gas fields map published by United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in 2007. Parrallel and meridian intersections on the map are used as control points and the second-order polynomial transformation is applied to georeference the map to a Lambert Conformal Conic projection based on the WGS 1984 datum. The map states the standard parallels used in the map projection, but not central meridan. East 45 degress is selected as the central meridian.

16 control points are used. Total RMS error is 429.7 meters with individual residuals ranging 96.7 - 649.8 meters. Alignment appears good with Esri World Street basemap at the scale of 1:1,000,000.

The source map is downloaded from Library of Congress at https://www.loc.gov/resource/g7421h.ct002142/

description: This digitally compiled map includes geology, oil and gas fields, and geologic provinces of Europe. The oil and gas map is part of a worldwide series released on CD-ROM by the World Energy Project of the U.S. Geological Survey. For data management purposes the world is divided into eight energy regions corresponding approximately to the economic regions of the world as defined by the U.S. Department of State. Europe (Region 4) including Turkey (Region 2) includes Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, Vatican City, Faroe Islands, Gibraltar, Guernsey, Jersey, Isle of Man, Svalbard; abstract: This digitally compiled map includes geology, oil and gas fields, and geologic provinces of Europe. The oil and gas map is part of a worldwide series released on CD-ROM by the World Energy Project of the U.S. Geological Survey. For data management purposes the world is divided into eight energy regions corresponding approximately to the economic regions of the world as defined by the U.S. Department of State. Europe (Region 4) including Turkey (Region 2) includes Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, Vatican City, Faroe Islands, Gibraltar, Guernsey, Jersey, Isle of Man, Svalbard

This map service was created to assemble oil and gas well information for a comprehensive inventory of energy data pertinent to the Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative decision-making process. These data are available as online resources for scientists, resource managers engaged in the Initiative, and other researchers. The GIS data and map documents created for this study are available for interactive analysis and/or download at the Energy Geoscience Center website.

IMPORTANT NOTICE This item has moved to a new organization and will enter Mature Support on May 7th, 2025. This item is scheduled to be Retired and removed from ArcGIS Online on July 7th, 2025. We encourage you to switch to using the item on the new organization as soon as possible to avoid any disruptions within your workflows. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a comment below or email our Living Atlas Curator (livingatlascurator@esri.ca) The new version of this item can be found here. This dataset provides information related to the principal producing oil and gas fields operating in Canada during the given reference year. The dataset is maintained by the National Energy Board.See Principal Mineral Areas, Producing Mines, and Oil and Gas Fields (900A) for additional resources, formats, services, and contact information.

This release contains geospatial data digitized from the Map Showing Geology, Structure, and Oil and Gas Fields in the Sterling 1x2 Degree Quadrangle, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas (Scott, 1978) and was compiled as part of the National Geologic Synthesis project. The geospatial data depicts the geology of this quadrangle, which is dominated by Quaternary alluvial and aeolian deposits overlying Tertiary and Cretaceous sedimentary rock, including the Ogallala formation, the Fox Hills sandstone, and the Pierre shale. The included database includes spatial data depicting the locations of mapped geologic contacts and faults, polygons denoting the mapped surficial extent of geologic formations, and structural contours denoting the depth to the top of the D sandstone of the Dakota Group. The database also contains non-spatial tables, including a list of data sources, a description of map units, a glossary of terms, and a data dictionary.

These maps and database are an update of the Ohio Division of Geological Survey (ODGS) oil and gas fields Digital Chart and Map Series (DCMS 13 through 21), which was completed in 1996. Previous Ohio oil and gas fields maps were also published in 1948, 1953, 1960, 1964, and 1974. The updated maps and database have been created using the GIS-based ESRI/ARCMAP software. All documented oil and gas pools/fields have been digitized as polygons and each polygon is linked to a unique pool/field identification (ID) number and name. Like the previous DCMS oil and gas fields maps, the updated oil and gas pools/fields have been grouped into 8 major plays defined by specific stratigraphic intervals. These are the 1) Pennsylvanian undifferentiated sandstones and coals, 2) Mississippian undifferentiated sandstones (excluding the Berea and Cussewago Sandstone) and Maxville Limestone, 3) Mississippian Berea and Cussewago sandstones), 4) Upper Devonian Ohio Shale and siltstones, 5) Silurian/Devonian Big Lime interval (Onondaga Limestone, Oriskany Sandstone, Bass Islands Dolomite, Salina Group, and Lockport Dolomite), 6) Silurian Cataract/ Medina sandstone (Clinton/Medina) and Dayton Formation (Packer Shell), 7) Middle Ordovician fractured shale, Trenton Limestone and Black River Group and Wells Creek Formation, and 8) Cambrian-Ordovician Knox Dolomite (Beekmantown dolomite, Rose Run sandstone, Copper Ridge dolomite, B-zone, and Krysik sandstone). All oil and gas pool/field ID's are defined and grouped by play and not geographic boundary, since most of the producing oil and gas reservoirs in Ohio occur within stratigraphic traps. This is a departure from the method used in the 1974 map in which oil and gas fields were assigned geographically, and not by producing horizon. Thus on the 1974 map, one field could contain multiple, stacked, partially overlapping, producing horizons from the Cambrian to the Pennsylvanian. Since the 1974 map was produced, over 58,000 additional wells have been drilled and completed in multiple, stacked producing horizons, mostly in unique stratigraphic traps. This has made it too cumbersome to assign all producing horizons to the same pool/field ID within any given geographic area. Assignment of pool/field ID's by play or stratigraphic interval provides a better geologic method of displaying and defining these pools/fields that are dominantly stratigraphic traps. With this method of outlining polygons for producing horizons, a pool is defined as a single polygon that produces from horizons within one play. When more than one polygon is assigned the same ID within the same play, these polygons are defined as a field. Pool/field production types are displayed as gas (red), oil (green), or storage (orange). In most cases, the assignment of production type was determined from the 1974 Ohio oil and gas field map. For updates to the 1974 map, the production type (excluding the Knox Dolomite play) was determined by the dominance of oil or gas symbol as displayed on the township well spot maps. In many cases a subjective decision was made, since many of the wells are displayed as combination oil and gas. With the Knox Dolomite play, the production type was based on gas-to-oil ratio (GOR) using data from the ODGS production database POGO (Production of Oil and Gas in Ohio). Oil production is shown for pools/fields with a GOR less than 5,000, and gas for fields with a GOR greater than 5,000. Calculations are based on cumulative production since 1984. This method of using GOR was not possible for the other, older historical plays because of insufficient production data. Whenever possible, existing outlines from the 1996 digital oil and gas fields maps were used. Exceptions to this are in areas where the 1996-pool/field boundaries were modified or new pool/field boundaries were created from additional drilling. Pool/field boundaries were digitized based upon documented wells from the ODGS township well spot maps, and in some areas from the Ohio Fuel Gas (OFG) well spot maps. The OFG maps were used primarily for the Pennsylvanian and Mississippian plays because many of these older wells are not located on the ODGS township well spot maps. In some areas, digitized pools/fields from the 1996 version were deleted if the oil and gas township and/or the OFG maps or well cards could not verify them. A minimum of 3 producing wells within a 1-mile distance was required to draw a pool/field outline. Storage field outlines are approximate and are based primarily on the 1974 map. In drawing new polygons for pool/field boundaries, a buffer of 1/2 mile was made around each producing well, and boundaries were drawn using these buffers. In assigning pool/field ID's, the historical numbers and names from the 1974 map were maintained whenever possible. Pools/fields may be consolidated into a larger consolidated field only if they occur within the same play. When two or more pools/fields are consolidated, they were assigned a new field ID. The name of the consolidated field was taken from the oldest pool/field within the consolidated field. There may be exceptions to this if the name is firmly entrenched in literature (i.e., Canton Consolidated, East Canton Consolidated, etc.). In a given geographic area of multiple producing horizons, the same ID was maintained for the dominant producing horizon. The less dominant producing horizons in other plays for this geographic area were assigned new pool/field ID's. Every pool/field with an assigned number has also been assigned a unique name. If it is a new pool/field ID that was not on the 1974 map, a new name was assigned using the nearest place name (i.e., town, village, city, etc.) or a named geographic feature (i.e., stream, river, ridge, etc.) from a topographic map.

This layer is the most up-to-date version of the oil and gas fields in Utah. 10 fields were expanded in 2020 to incorporate wildcat/undesignated wells within the Uinta Basin specifically. for information, including PROD_FORM codes, please see the SGID datapage for this item.

Contained within the 4th Edition (1974) of the Atlas of Canada is a collection of graphics and two maps. The first map shows the location of oil and gas fields, pipelines and processing plants for Eastern Canada. The capacity and location of oil refineries and gas processing plants are also denoted. The second map shows distribution and production of coal for 1970. The location and types of coal deposits are denoted as well as coal mine locations and type of operation. Graphs for coal producing areas are superimposed on the second map and collectively represent the value and weight of more than 99% of the coal produced in Canada for 1970. These maps are accompanied by a set of graphs providing coal production by type and province, total estimated reserves and value of all mineral production for 1970.