30 datasets found
  1. w

    Oklahoma Well locations and operators

    • data.wu.ac.at
    • data.amerigeoss.org
    shp
    Updated Mar 23, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2015). Oklahoma Well locations and operators [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/edx_netl_doe_gov/MDNhNWIxMzgtYmI3Zi00NjczLTg1MGUtYjc1NTQxYjc3MDU0
    Explore at:
    shpAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 23, 2015
    Area covered
    1350c1019a67d148c59b50f2a9e90aeb5b22cded
    Description

    Locations of oil and gas wells in Oklahoma. Also contains information on the formation and well operator.

  2. OCC WELL DATA FINDER

    • gisdata-occokc.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 21, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oklahoma Corporation Commission (2022). OCC WELL DATA FINDER [Dataset]. https://gisdata-occokc.opendata.arcgis.com/items/5636f186e8a040c9b34c4c8519c8560e
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 21, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oklahoma Corporation Commissionhttps://oklahoma.gov/occ.html
    Area covered
    Description

    Layer-rich searchable mapping application displaying available well data curated by the Oklahoma Corporation Commission. Multiple outside data sources are included for geologic and hydrogeologic reference (sources cited in item descriptions). Cultural data and political districts also included for convenience.

  3. o

    Datasets and U-Net Model for "A Deep Learning Based Framework to Identify...

    • osti.gov
    Updated Oct 21, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    LBNL (2024). Datasets and U-Net Model for "A Deep Learning Based Framework to Identify Undocumented Orphaned Oil and Gas Wells from Historical Maps: a Case Study for California and Oklahoma" [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.18141/2452768
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 21, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    LBNL
    USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE)
    National Energy Technology Laboratory - Energy Data eXchange
    Area covered
    California
    Description

    This dataset has results and the model associated with the publication Ciulla et al., (2024). It contains a U-Net semantic segmentation model (unet_model.h5) and associated code implemented in tensorflow 2.0 for the model training and identification of oil and gas well symbols in USGS historical topographic maps (HTMC). Given a quadrangle map (7.5 minutes), downloadable at this url: https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/, and a list of coordinates of the documented wells present in the area, the model returns the coordinates of oil and gas symbols in the HTMC maps. For reproducibility of our workflow, we provide a sample map in California and the documented well locations for the entire State of California (CalGEM_AllWells_20231128.csv) downloaded from https://www.conservation.ca.gov/calgem/maps/Pages/GISMapping2.aspx. Additionally, the locations of 1,301 potential undocumented orphaned wells identified using our deep learning framework or the counties of Los Angeles and Kern in California, and Osage and Oklahoma in Oklahoma are provided in the file found_potential_UOWs.zip. The results of the visual inspection of satellite imagery in Osage County is in the file visible_potential_UOWs.zip. The dataset also includes a custom tool to validate the detected symbols in the HTMC maps (vetting_tool.py). More details about the methodology can be found in the associated paper: Ciulla, F., Santos, A., Jordan, P., Kneafsey, T., Biraud, S.C., and Varadharajan, C. (2024) A Deep Learning Based Framework to Identify Undocumented Orphaned Oil and Gas Wells from Historical Maps: a Case Study for California and Oklahoma. Accepted for publication in Environmental Science and Technology. The geographical coordinates provided correspond to the locations of potential undocumented orphaned oil and gas wells (UOWs) extracted from historical maps. The actual presence of wells need to be confirmed with on-the-ground investigations. For your safety, do not attempt to visit or investigate these sites without appropriate safety training, proper equipment, and authorization from local authorities. Approaching these well sites without proper personal protective equipment (PPE) may pose significant health and safety risks. Oil and gas wells can emit hazardous gasses including methane, which is flammable, odorless and colorless, as well as hydrogen sulfide, which can be fatal even at low concentrations. Additionally, there may be unstable ground near the wellhead that may collapse around the wellbore. This dataset was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor the Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or the Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof or the Regents of the University of California.

  4. Oil Drilling & Gas Extraction in Oklahoma - Market Research Report...

    • ibisworld.com
    Updated Aug 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    IBISWorld (2025). Oil Drilling & Gas Extraction in Oklahoma - Market Research Report (2015-2030) [Dataset]. https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/industry/oklahoma/oil-drilling-gas-extraction/35418/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 15, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    IBISWorld
    License

    https://www.ibisworld.com/about/termsofuse/https://www.ibisworld.com/about/termsofuse/

    Time period covered
    2015 - 2030
    Description

    The Oil Drilling & Gas Extraction industry in Oklahoma is expected to grow an annualized x.x% to $x.x billion over the five years to 2025, while the national industry will likely grow at x.x% during the same period. Industry establishments decreased an annualized -x.x% to x,xxx locations. Industry employment has decreased an annualized -x.x% to x,xxx workers, while industry wages have decreased an annualized -x.x% to $x.x billion.

  5. a

    Oil and Natural Gas Wells

    • hifld-geoplatform.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 21, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GeoPlatform ArcGIS Online (2019). Oil and Natural Gas Wells [Dataset]. https://hifld-geoplatform.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/oil-and-natural-gas-wells/data
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 21, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    GeoPlatform ArcGIS Online
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This feature class/shapefile represents Oil and Natural Gas Wells. An Oil and Natural Gas Well is a hole drilled in the earth for the purpose of finding or producing crude oil or natural gas; or producing services related to the production of crude or natural gas. Geographic coverage includes the United States (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wyoming) as well Oil and Natural Gas wells in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia and Manitoba that are within 100 miles of the country's border with the United States. According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA) the following states do not have active/producing Oil or Natural Gas Wells: Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Idaho, Massachusetts, Maine, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont, and Wisconsin. Some states do have wells for underground Natural Gas storage facilities where these have been identified they were included. This layer is derived from well data from individual states and provinces and United States Agencies. This layer is complete for the United States but further development of data missing from two Canadian provinces and Mexico is in process. This update release includes an additional 497,036 wells covering Texas. Oil and gas exploration in Texas takes advantage of drilling technology to use a single surface well drilling location to drill multiple bottom hole well connections to extract oil and gas. The addition of Well data from Texas results in the addition of a related table to support this one surface well to many bottom hole connections. This related table provides records for Wells that have more than one bottom hole linked to the surface well.

  6. Crude oil production in the U.S. by state 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Crude oil production in the U.S. by state 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/714376/crude-oil-production-by-us-state/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 27, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2024
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Texas is by far the largest oil-producing state in the United States. In 2024, Texas produced a total of over two billion barrels. In a distant second place is New Mexico, which produced 744.6 million barrels in the same year. Virginia is the smallest producing state in the country, at three thousand barrels. Macro perspective of U.S. oil production The U.S. oil production totaled some 19.4 million barrels of oil per day, or a total annual oil production of 827 million metric tons in 2023. As the largest oil producer in the U.S., it is not surprising that Texas is home to the most productive U.S. oil basin, the Permian. The Permian has routinely accounted for at least 50 percent of total onshore production. Regional distribution of U.S. oil production A total of 32 of the 50 U.S. states produce oil. There are five regional divisions for oil production in the U.S., known as the Petroleum Administration for Defense Districts (PADD). These five regional divisions of the allocation of fuels derived from petroleum products were established in the U.S. during the Second World War and they are still used today for data collection purposes. In line with the fact that Texas is by far the largest U.S. oil producing state, PADD 3 (Gulf Coast) is also the largest oil producing PADD, as it also includes the federal offshore region in the Gulf of Mexico. There are around 590 operational oil and gas rigs in the country as of February 2025.

  7. f

    Data from: A Deep Learning Based Framework to Identify Undocumented Orphaned...

    • acs.figshare.com
    zip
    Updated Nov 25, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Fabio Ciulla; Andre Santos; Preston Jordan; Timothy Kneafsey; Sebastien C. Biraud; Charuleka Varadharajan (2024). A Deep Learning Based Framework to Identify Undocumented Orphaned Oil and Gas Wells from Historical Maps: A Case Study for California and Oklahoma [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c04413.s001
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 25, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    ACS Publications
    Authors
    Fabio Ciulla; Andre Santos; Preston Jordan; Timothy Kneafsey; Sebastien C. Biraud; Charuleka Varadharajan
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    California
    Description

    Undocumented Orphaned Wells (UOWs) are wells without an operator that have limited or no documentation with regulatory authorities. An estimated 310,000 to 800,000 UOWs exist in the United States (US), whose locations are largely unknown. These wells can potentially leak methane and other volatile organic compounds to the atmosphere, and contaminate groundwater. In this study, we developed a novel framework utilizing a state-of-the-art computer vision neural network model to identify the precise locations of potential UOWs. The U-Net model is trained to detect oil and gas well symbols in georeferenced historical topographic maps, and potential UOWs are identified as symbols that are further than 100 m from any documented well. A custom tool was developed to rapidly validate the potential UOW locations. We applied this framework to four counties in California and Oklahoma, leading to the discovery of 1301 potential UOWs across >40,000 km2. We confirmed the presence of 29 UOWs from satellite images and 15 UOWs from magnetic surveys in the field with a spatial accuracy on the order of 10 m. This framework can be scaled to identify potential UOWs across the US since the historical maps are available for the entire nation.

  8. w

    The drilling of a horizontal well in a mature oil field

    • data.wu.ac.at
    html
    Updated Sep 29, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2016). The drilling of a horizontal well in a mature oil field [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/edx_netl_doe_gov/NWNlNjA3YjQtNmY5OS00MDRmLTg2NDUtZWM3NjNjNzJhMzIw
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 29, 2016
    Description

    This report documents the drilling of a medium radius horizontal well in the Bartlesville Sand of the Flatrock Field, Osage County, Oklahoma by Rougeot Oil and Gas Corporation (Rougeot) of Sperry, Oklahoma. The report includes the rationale for selecting the particular site, the details of drilling the well, the production response, conclusions reached, and recommendations made for the future drilling of horizontal wells. 11 figs., 2 tabs.

  9. Z

    Data from: Locating undocumented orphaned oil and gas wells with smartphones...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Apr 13, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Saneiyan, Sina; Mansourian, Danial (2024). Locating undocumented orphaned oil and gas wells with smartphones [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_7697214
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 13, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    University of Oklahoma
    Authors
    Saneiyan, Sina; Mansourian, Danial
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Majority of the estimated 3 million abandoned oil and gas wells in the U.S. have missing documents and lack surface equipment making them difficult to locate. However, most of them have casings made of iron alloys which are magnetic and can be sensed by magnetometers. Here we utilize an iPhone 12 mini smartphone as a magnetometer to locate two abandoned wells. We designed a simple unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) survey setup where the iPhone 12 mini was hung from an inexpensive small drone. We surveyed the two sites by flying the drone at altitudes, 10 m, 15 m, and 20 m above ground level. Our results show that at altitude of 10 magl the smartphone magnetometer could pick the magnetic anomaly of either of the wells at intensities ≥ 52 μT; sufficient to accurately locate the wells. At altitude of 15 magl the smartphone could locate the wells within ~5 m radius of the actual wells’ location, and it was unable to detect any magnetic anomalies at 20 magl. Simplicity of the setup, minimal required scientific knowledge and low cost of the setup makes this setup an ideal tool for locating orphaned wells by citizen scientists.

  10. o

    Oklahoma Wellbore Rasters

    • osti.gov
    • data.amerigeoss.org
    Updated Apr 1, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NETL (2018). Oklahoma Wellbore Rasters [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.18141/1503686
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 1, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE)
    NETL
    National Energy Technology Laboratory - Energy Data eXchange
    Description

    Seven raster surfaces generated from wellbore information that are thought to influence fluid and or gas migration in the subsurface. Wellbore information was originally retrieved from the IHS Energy Group (current as of April 2015), which is a proprietary, commercial database containing information for most oil and gas wells in the U.S. Processing of wellbore information into gridded cells was performed to provide a graphic solution to overcome the problem of displaying proprietary well data. No proprietary data are displayed or included in the cell maps. These rasters were developed to serve as inputs to the SIMPA (Spatially Weighted Multivariate Probabilistic Assessment) tool. Each raster surface is a derivative product of wellbore dataset. Each raster represents a single wellbore attribute or combination of attributes that speak to the following wellbore characteristics: number of recompletions, year spud, year abandoned, year completed, number of abandoned wells, hole direction, switch from production to injection. The original wellbore information, retrieved from the IHS Energy Group, are in the form of points – these derivative rasters aggregate point attributes to approximately 1,000-meter resolution grid cells. Each raster only includes cells that contain wellbores with the characteristics represented in each surface (i.e. if the wellbores in a given cell have no year abandoned data, the cell is not included in the raster). Since the raster cells combine data from multiple points in many cases, methods such as the average, minimum, and count are used to summarize the information in each cell. The specific operations used to develop each raster are detailed in its metadata.

  11. m

    Cherokee Platform Wells Data

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Sep 22, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Patricia Saint-Vincent (2020). Cherokee Platform Wells Data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/nvdrt2yk3n.1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 22, 2020
    Authors
    Patricia Saint-Vincent
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Methane and ethane emissions from individual abandoned oil and gas wells presented and analyzed in the publication entitled "An Analysis of Abandoned Oil Well Characteristics Affecting Methane Emissions Estimates in the Cherokee Platform in Eastern Oklahoma."

  12. d

    Data from: Hexane extractable material in water-based and oil-based drilling...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    Updated Nov 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2025). Hexane extractable material in water-based and oil-based drilling fluid wastes collected from sites in Oklahoma, North Dakota, and Wyoming in 2021 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/hexane-extractable-material-in-water-based-and-oil-based-drilling-fluid-wastes-collected-f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 27, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Description

    Wells drilled during oil and gas exploration use drilling fluids to cool and lubricate the drilling bit and clear the borehole of cuttings. These fluids are recycled during the drilling process, but eventually can no longer be used. This is an important waste stream from petroleum generation that requires disposal. Chemical characterization of these materials is important to determine if these wastes have value or pose a risk if improperly handled. This study collected 13 samples of water-based and oil-based drilling fluid waste for hexane extractable material (also referred to as oil and grease) analysis.

  13. d

    National Assessment of Oil and Gas Project Bend Arch-Ft. Worth Basin...

    • search.dataone.org
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +5more
    Updated Oct 29, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2016). National Assessment of Oil and Gas Project Bend Arch-Ft. Worth Basin Province (045) Quarter-Mile Cells [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/a65baaa4-ac0d-464a-adee-cca72187e44a
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    United States Geological Survey (USGS)
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    REG_NUM, TPSCODE, TPSNAME, CELLSYMB, PROVCODE, REG_NAME, PROV_NAME, ASSESSCODE, ASSESSNAME
    Description

    Cell maps for each oil and gas assessment unit were created by the USGS as a method for illustrating the degree of exploration, type of production, and distribution of production in an assessment unit or province. Each cell represents a quarter-mile square of the land surface, and the cells are coded to represent whether the wells included within the cell are predominantly oil-producing, gas-producing, both oil and gas-producing, dry, or the type of production of the wells located within the cell is unknown. The well information was initially retrieved from the IHS Energy Group, PI/Dwights PLUS Well Data on CD-ROM, which is a proprietary, commercial database containing information for most oil and gas wells in the U.S. Cells were developed as a graphic solution to overcome the problem of displaying proprietary PI/Dwights PLUS Well Data. No proprietary data are displayed or included in the cell maps. The data from PI/Dwights PLUS Well Data were current as of April 2003 when the cell maps were created in 2003.

  14. Oklahoma oil and gas wells in the Sand Sagebrush Prairie Ecoregion.

    • plos.figshare.com
    application/csv
    Updated May 31, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Megan P. Vhay; David A. Haukos; Daniel S. Sullins; Mindy B. Rice (2024). Oklahoma oil and gas wells in the Sand Sagebrush Prairie Ecoregion. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304452.s004
    Explore at:
    application/csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Megan P. Vhay; David A. Haukos; Daniel S. Sullins; Mindy B. Rice
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Oklahoma
    Description

    Oklahoma oil and gas wells in the Sand Sagebrush Prairie Ecoregion.

  15. A

    Conference: Symposium on enhanced oil and gas recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma,...

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    • data.wu.ac.at
    pdf
    Updated Aug 9, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Energy Data Exchange (2019). Conference: Symposium on enhanced oil and gas recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 30 Aug 1977 [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/el/dataset/conference-symposium-on-enhanced-oil-and-gas-recovery-tulsa-oklahoma-usa-30-aug-1977
    Explore at:
    pdf(6398154), pdf(31317209)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 9, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    Energy Data Exchange
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Tulsa, United States, Oklahoma
    Description

    Conference proceedings on enhanced oil and gas recovery and improved drilling methods in , Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 30 Aug 1977

  16. w

    Data from: A Small Independent Producer's Design, Construction and Operation...

    • data.wu.ac.at
    pdf
    Updated Sep 29, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2016). A Small Independent Producer's Design, Construction and Operation of a Flue Gas Injection Project, East Edna Field, Okmulgee County, Oklahoma [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/edx_netl_doe_gov/NzE3ZDcyMjQtNmI5ZC00OTAxLWFmNGItMDFmY2VhZjgxODY4
    Explore at:
    pdf(128224.0)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 29, 2016
    Description

    Driver Production was one of four companies awarded a grant from the U.S. Department of Energy as a result of a competitive procurement for small independent producers to demonstrate economic application of gas repressurization of oil reservoirs. Driver Production proposed a Flue Gas Injection (N2 and CO2 ) project in a five-spot pattern in the East Edna Field, Okmulgee County, Oklahoma, USA. The paper describes the design, construction, start-up, expansion and operation of a flue gas project that uses produced natural gas as the energy source for combustion and compression. Changing the engine to a larger unit to allow for higher gas injection capacity and for injection at higher pressure demonstrated the need for critical control of flue gas quality to minimize corrosion problems associated with CO2 injection. The project has demonstrated that even small operators can successfully implement gas repressurization to increase oil production from a pressure-depleted reservoir. The project, initiated in 1996, continues to increase oil and natural gas production as long as flue gas is injected. The economics of the project and success to date have prompted the project operator and other operators who have visited and analyzed the project to consider application of flue gas in their small pressure depleted reservoirs.

  17. m

    Mach Natural Resources LP - Ebitda

    • macro-rankings.com
    csv, excel
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    macro-rankings, Mach Natural Resources LP - Ebitda [Dataset]. https://www.macro-rankings.com/markets/stocks/mnr-nyse/income-statement/ebitda
    Explore at:
    csv, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset authored and provided by
    macro-rankings
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    united states
    Description

    Ebitda Time Series for Mach Natural Resources LP. Mach Natural Resources LP, an independent upstream oil and gas company, focuses on the acquisition, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids reserves in the Anadarko Basin region of Western Oklahoma, Southern Kansas, and the panhandle of Texas. It owns a portfolio of midstream assets, as well as owns plants and water infrastructure. The company was incorporated in 2023 and is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

  18. d

    Crude Oil Analysis (COA) Database

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.openei.org
    • +1more
    Updated Aug 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2025). Crude Oil Analysis (COA) Database [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/crude-oil-analysis-coa-database-510c1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 23, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Renewable Energy Laboratory
    Description

    The Crude Oil Analysis (COA) database contains the digital data compilation of 9,076 crude oil analyses from samples collected from 1920 through 1983 from the United States and around the world and analyzed by the United States Bureau of Mines (National Institute for Petroleum and Energy Research, 1995). Two laboratories (Bartlesville, Oklahoma, and Laramie, Wyoming) performed routine crude oil analyses by a standardized method, and the data were originally reported in more than 50 reports by the Bureau of Mines. Analyses include specific gravity, API gravity, pour point, viscosity, sulfur content, nitrogen content, and color of the crude oil, as well as the bulk properties of the distillation cuts. The data were digitized in the late 1970s and a database retrieval system was implemented in 1980 and made available to the public. The Department of Energy (DOE) updated this system in 1995-96 with public access through a dial-up bulletin board system. The database was operated by the National Institute for Petroleum and Energy Research (NIPER) in Bartlesville, Oklahoma. A stand-alone version of the database (COADB) was available in 1995 in the form of a series of tables in Foxpro (.dbf) format. In 1998, an updated version of COADB was available on the NIPER website that included a Microsoft Access 97 version of the database called "coadb.mdb". The file contains more tables than the original 1995 version but we believe the number of oil samples and the amount of raw data are the same. The additional tables contain text translations for codes used in other tables regarding color, county, laboratory, formation, geologic age, lithology, and state name. Sample location information is generally inadequate to identify the specific well in most cases. The sample location information lacks lease name and in many cases well number and section-township-range. In rare cases, the latitude and longitude are given. A 2002 version was provided by the National Energy Technology Laboratory.

  19. w

    Data from: STIMULATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR DEEP WELL COMPLETIONS

    • data.wu.ac.at
    html
    Updated Sep 29, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2016). STIMULATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR DEEP WELL COMPLETIONS [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/edx_netl_doe_gov/OWM3ZTVmMDgtYzQ5Ny00NGUxLThhYTMtNjU0ZTEyZmZmYzFj
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 29, 2016
    Description

    The Department of Energy (DOE) is sponsoring a Deep Trek Program targeted at improving the economics of drilling and completing deep gas wells. Under the DOE program, Pinnacle Technologies is conducting a project to evaluate the stimulation of deep wells. The objective of the project is to assess U.S. deep well drilling & stimulation activity, review rock mechanics & fracture growth in deep, high pressure/temperature wells and evaluate stimulation technology in several key deep plays. Phase 1 was recently completed and consisted of assessing deep gas well drilling activity (1995-2007) and an industry survey on deep gas well stimulation practices by region. Of the 29,000 oil, gas and dry holes drilled in 2002, about 300 were drilled in the deep well; 25% were dry, 50% were high temperature/high pressure completions and 25% were simply deep completions. South Texas has about 30% of these wells, Oklahoma 20%, Gulf of Mexico Shelf 15% and the Gulf Coast about 15%. The Rockies represent only 2% of deep drilling. Of the 60 operators who drill deep and HTHP wells, the top 20 drill almost 80% of the wells. Six operators drill half the U.S. deep wells. Deep drilling peaked at 425 wells in 1998 and fell to 250 in 1999. Drilling is expected to rise through 2004 after which drilling should cycle down as overall drilling declines.

  20. F

    Gross Domestic Product: Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing (324) in...

    • fred.stlouisfed.org
    json
    Updated Sep 26, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Gross Domestic Product: Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing (324) in Oklahoma [Dataset]. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/OKPETCOALMANNGSP
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 26, 2025
    License

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain

    Area covered
    Oklahoma
    Description

    Graph and download economic data for Gross Domestic Product: Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing (324) in Oklahoma (OKPETCOALMANNGSP) from 1997 to 2024 about coal, petroleum, OK, nondurable goods, GSP, private industries, production, goods, private, manufacturing, industry, GDP, and USA.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
(2015). Oklahoma Well locations and operators [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/edx_netl_doe_gov/MDNhNWIxMzgtYmI3Zi00NjczLTg1MGUtYjc1NTQxYjc3MDU0

Oklahoma Well locations and operators

Explore at:
shpAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Mar 23, 2015
Area covered
1350c1019a67d148c59b50f2a9e90aeb5b22cded
Description

Locations of oil and gas wells in Oklahoma. Also contains information on the formation and well operator.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu