Displays a report of the entire enterprise data inventory for all published data assets in Mobius so that this data can be reported to OMB.

This file contains historical outlays and offsetting receipts for 1962 through the current budget year, as well as four years of projections. It can be used to reproduce many of the totals published in the Budget and examine unpublished details below the levels of aggregation published in the Budget.

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) publishes the Capital Commitment Plan three times a year as a series of pdf files, generally in the months of January, April, and September as part of the publication of the Preliminary, Executive, and Adopted Capital Budgets.

To explore the data, please visit Capital Planning Explorer

For additional information, please visit A Guide to The Capital Budget

The Capital Projects Database reports information at the project level on discrete capital investments from the Capital Commitment Plan.Each row is uniquely identified by its Financial Management Service (FMS) ID, and contains data pertaining to the sponsoring and managing agency.

To explore the data, please visit Capital Planning Explorer

For additional information, please visit A Guide to The Capital Budget

This dataset includes the Fiscal Year* 2015 County Executive Recommended and County Council Approved operating budgets for Montgomery County, for comparison purposes. The dataset does not include revenues and agency budget information; each agency, such as Montgomery County Public Schools, maintain their individual budget information. The data can be sorted, filtered, and exported by the following elements: Function (grouping, such as “Public Safety”), Department, Program, Cost Center (activity within a program), Fund Type , Fund Subtype, Fund Name, Subfund Name, Personnel & Operating Expenses, Object Name, and Account Name. *The 12-month period to which the annual operating and capital budgets and their respective appropriations apply. The Montgomery County fiscal year starts on July 1st and ends on June 30th. Update Frequency: Annually

This dataset includes the County Executive’s Recommended and Approved Capital funding for the recent fiscal years.

OMB Recommended Vs Approved Operating Budget

Graph and download economic data for Federal Surplus or Deficit - from 1901 to 2024 about budget, federal, and USA.

Historical information about the annual Stakeholder Ratings of OMB Services survey is distributed by the Management Assistant in OMB at the direction of the Operations Budget Coordinator and OMB Department Director. The number of participants in the survey is dependent on the individuals who participate in the budget process with OMB. Larger departments will have multiple individuals involved in the budget process to fulfill different roles of the process such as Year End Estimates, operational budget construction, budget requests and other elements based on need. Smaller departments will only involve one person in the creation of the budget.

The results from the survey are defined by a percentage of respondents that answer Strongly Agree or Agree that the OMB staff was responsive, the quality of instructions, the clarity of communication, and the ease of tools such as PB, FIN and Sharepoint Site. Respondents who do not answer Strongly Agree or Agree count as a partial percentage towards failure.

The Core Based Statistical Areas boundaries were defined by OMB based on the 2010 Census, and the dataset was updated on August 09, 2019 from the United States Census Bureau (USCB) and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas are together termed Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) and are defined by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and consist of the county or counties or equivalent entities associated with at least one urban core (urbanized area or urban cluster) of at least 10,000 population, plus adjacent counties having a high degree of social and economic integration with the core as measured through commuting ties with the counties containing the core. Categories of CBSAs are: Metropolitan Statistical Areas, based on urbanized areas of 50,000 or more population; and Micropolitan Statistical Areas, based on urban clusters of at least 10,000 population but less than 50,000 population. The CBSA boundaries are those defined by OMB based on the 2010 Census, published in 2013, and updated in 2018.

The OMB Office of the Chief Information Officer (OFCIO) has a long-standing practice of making information about Federal IT available to the public through various tools and reports to Congress. Consistent with this practice, OMB OFCIO will be making agency cost savings and avoidances data available to the public via http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/e-gov. This dataset links to USDAs Realized Cost Savings and Avoidances data in JSON format.

Replication Code and Data to recreate tables and graphs from "New OMB's race and ethnicity standards will affect how Americans self-identify." (2024-10-04)

This dataset includes the Fiscal Year* 2026 County Executive Recommended operating budgets for Montgomery County. The data can be sorted, filtered, and exported by the following elements: Function (grouping, such as “Public Safety”), Department, Program, Cost Center (activity within a program), Fund Type , Subfund Name, Expense Type, Recommended Amount, and Account Name.The Montgomery County fiscal year starts on July 1st and ends on June 30th. Update Frequency: Annually

Graph and download economic data for Federal Outlays: Interest as Percent of Gross Domestic Product (FYOIGDA188S) from 1940 to 2024 about outlays, federal, percent, interest, GDP, and USA.

Progress Needed on Identifying Expenditures, Building and Utilizing a Data Infrastructure, and Reducing Duplicative Efforts The federal government collects, maintains, and uses geospatial information—data linked to specific geographic locations—to help support varied missions, including national security and natural resources conservation. To coordinate geospatial activities, in 1994 the President issued an executive order to develop a National Spatial Data Infrastructure—a framework for coordination that includes standards, data themes, and a clearinghouse. GAO was asked to review federal and state coordination of geospatial data. GAO’s objectives were to (1) describe the geospatial data that selected federal agencies and states use and how much is spent on geospatial data; (2) assess progress in establishing the National Spatial Data Infrastructure; and (3) determine whether selected federal agencies and states invest in duplicative geospatial data. To do so, GAO identified federal and state uses of geospatial data; evaluated available cost data from 2013 to 2015; assessed FGDC’s and selected agencies’ efforts to establish the infrastructure; and analyzed federal and state datasets to identify duplication. What GAO Found Federal agencies and state governments use a variety of geospatial datasets to support their missions. For example, after Hurricane Sandy in 2012, the Federal Emergency Management Agency used geospatial data to identify 44,000 households that were damaged and inaccessible and reported that, as a result, it was able to provide expedited assistance to area residents. Federal agencies report spending billions of dollars on geospatial investments; however, the estimates are understated because agencies do not always track geospatial investments. For example, these estimates do not include billions of dollars spent on earth-observing satellites that produce volumes of geospatial data. The Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) have started an initiative to have agencies identify and report annually on geospatial-related investments as part of the fiscal year 2017 budget process. FGDC and selected federal agencies have made progress in implementing their responsibilities for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure as outlined in OMB guidance; however, critical items remain incomplete. For example, the committee established a clearinghouse for records on geospatial data, but the clearinghouse lacks an effective search capability and performance monitoring. FGDC also initiated plans and activities for coordinating with state governments on the collection of geospatial data; however, state officials GAO contacted are generally not satisfied with the committee’s efforts to coordinate with them. Among other reasons, they feel that the committee is focused on a federal perspective rather than a national one, and that state recommendations are often ignored. In addition, selected agencies have made limited progress in their own strategic planning efforts and in using the clearinghouse to register their data to ensure they do not invest in duplicative data. For example, 8 of the committee’s 32 member agencies have begun to register their data on the clearinghouse, and they have registered 59 percent of the geospatial data they deemed critical. Part of the reason that agencies are not fulfilling their responsibilities is that OMB has not made it a priority to oversee these efforts. Until OMB ensures that FGDC and federal agencies fully implement their responsibilities, the vision of improving the coordination of geospatial information and reducing duplicative investments will not be fully realized. OMB guidance calls for agencies to eliminate duplication, avoid redundant expenditures, and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the sharing and dissemination of geospatial data. However, some data are collected multiple times by federal, state, and local entities, resulting in duplication in effort and resources. A new initiative to create a national address database could potentially result in significant savings for federal, state, and local governments. However, agencies face challenges in effectively coordinating address data collection efforts, including statutory restrictions on sharing certain federal address data. Until there is effective coordination across the National Spatial Data Infrastructure, there will continue to be duplicative efforts to obtain and maintain these data at every level of government.https://www.gao.gov/assets/d15193.pdfWhat GAO Recommends GAO suggests that Congress consider assessing statutory limitations on address data to foster progress toward a national address database. GAO also recommends that OMB improve its oversight of FGDC and federal agency initiatives, and that FGDC and selected agencies fully implement initiatives. The agencies generally agreed with the recommendations and identified plans to implement them.

This dataset includes the County Council Approved Capital funding for the projects to the recent fiscal years. Update Frequency : Annually

This dataset includes the County Council Approved operating budgets expenditures for Montgomery County. The data can be sorted, filtered, and exported by the following elements: Service, Department, Program, Cost Center (activity within a program), Fund Type , Expense Category, Subfund Name, Expense Type, and Account Name. Update Frequency : Annually

This dataset includes the County Executive Recommended operating budgets revenues for Montgomery County. The data can be sorted, filtered, and exported by the following elements: Service, Fund Type , Item Category, Fund, and Description. Update Frequency : Annually

The OMB Office of the Chief Information Officer (OFCIO) has a long-standing practice of making information about Federal IT available to the public through various tools and reports to Congress. Consistent with this practice, OMB OFCIO will be making agency cost savings and avoidances data available to the public via http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/e-gov. This dataset links to NASA's Realized Cost Savings and Avoidances data in JSON format.

The Capital Projects Database reports information at the project level on discrete capital investments from the Capital Commitment Plan.Each row is uniquely identified by its Financial Management Service (FMS) ID, and contains data pertaining to the sponsoring and managing agency.

To explore the data, please visit Capital Planning Explorer

For additional information, please visit A Guide to The Capital Budget