8 datasets found
  1. Supplementary material from "Visual comparison of two data sets: Do people...

    • figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Mar 14, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Robin Kramer; Caitlin Telfer; Alice Towler (2017). Supplementary material from "Visual comparison of two data sets: Do people use the means and the variability?" [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4751095.v1
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 14, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    figshare
    Authors
    Robin Kramer; Caitlin Telfer; Alice Towler
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In our everyday lives, we are required to make decisions based upon our statistical intuitions. Often, these involve the comparison of two groups, such as luxury versus family cars and their suitability. Research has shown that the mean difference affects judgements where two sets of data are compared, but the variability of the data has only a minor influence, if any at all. However, prior research has tended to present raw data as simple lists of values. Here, we investigated whether displaying data visually, in the form of parallel dot plots, would lead viewers to incorporate variability information. In Experiment 1, we asked a large sample of people to compare two fictional groups (children who drank ‘Brain Juice’ versus water) in a one-shot design, where only a single comparison was made. Our results confirmed that only the mean difference between the groups predicted subsequent judgements of how much they differed, in line with previous work using lists of numbers. In Experiment 2, we asked each participant to make multiple comparisons, with both the mean difference and the pooled standard deviation varying across data sets they were shown. Here, we found that both sources of information were correctly incorporated when making responses. Taken together, we suggest that increasing the salience of variability information, through manipulating this factor across items seen, encourages viewers to consider this in their judgements. Such findings may have useful applications for best practices when teaching difficult concepts like sampling variation.

  2. Quantitative results for different metrics under varying levels of distance...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Oct 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei (2024). Quantitative results for different metrics under varying levels of distance between instances are presented in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307432.t005
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Quantitative results for different metrics under varying levels of distance between instances are presented in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset.

  3. Quantitative results for different metrics under varying levels of occlusion...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Oct 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei (2024). Quantitative results for different metrics under varying levels of occlusion in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307432.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Quantitative results for different metrics under varying levels of occlusion in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset.

  4. A comparison of instance segmentation results between different metrics for...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Oct 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei (2024). A comparison of instance segmentation results between different metrics for creating the affinity matrix, with the proposed metric, regarding mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 and OVIS datasets. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307432.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    A comparison of instance segmentation results between different metrics for creating the affinity matrix, with the proposed metric, regarding mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 and OVIS datasets.

  5. Quantitative results for different metrics under varying levels of FG/BG...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Oct 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei (2024). Quantitative results for different metrics under varying levels of FG/BG smoothness in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307432.t006
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Quantitative results for different metrics under varying levels of FG/BG smoothness in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset.

  6. Quantitative results for instance segmentation considering different ratio...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Oct 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei (2024). Quantitative results for instance segmentation considering different ratio values, in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307432.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    YouTube
    Description

    Quantitative results for instance segmentation considering different ratio values, in terms of mIoU on the Youtube-VIS 2019 dataset.

  7. An ablation study to analyze the impact of proposed components on mIoU.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Oct 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei (2024). An ablation study to analyze the impact of proposed components on mIoU. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307432.t007
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    An ablation study to analyze the impact of proposed components on mIoU.

  8. F-score results for Fg-Bg segmentation, considering different values of M,...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Oct 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei (2024). F-score results for Fg-Bg segmentation, considering different values of M, with and without post-processing. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307432.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Farnoosh Arefi; Amir M. Mansourian; Shohreh Kasaei
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    F-score results for Fg-Bg segmentation, considering different values of M, with and without post-processing.

  9. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Robin Kramer; Caitlin Telfer; Alice Towler (2017). Supplementary material from "Visual comparison of two data sets: Do people use the means and the variability?" [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4751095.v1
Organization logoOrganization logo

Supplementary material from "Visual comparison of two data sets: Do people use the means and the variability?"

Explore at:
xlsxAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Mar 14, 2017
Dataset provided by
Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
figshare
Authors
Robin Kramer; Caitlin Telfer; Alice Towler
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

In our everyday lives, we are required to make decisions based upon our statistical intuitions. Often, these involve the comparison of two groups, such as luxury versus family cars and their suitability. Research has shown that the mean difference affects judgements where two sets of data are compared, but the variability of the data has only a minor influence, if any at all. However, prior research has tended to present raw data as simple lists of values. Here, we investigated whether displaying data visually, in the form of parallel dot plots, would lead viewers to incorporate variability information. In Experiment 1, we asked a large sample of people to compare two fictional groups (children who drank ‘Brain Juice’ versus water) in a one-shot design, where only a single comparison was made. Our results confirmed that only the mean difference between the groups predicted subsequent judgements of how much they differed, in line with previous work using lists of numbers. In Experiment 2, we asked each participant to make multiple comparisons, with both the mean difference and the pooled standard deviation varying across data sets they were shown. Here, we found that both sources of information were correctly incorporated when making responses. Taken together, we suggest that increasing the salience of variability information, through manipulating this factor across items seen, encourages viewers to consider this in their judgements. Such findings may have useful applications for best practices when teaching difficult concepts like sampling variation.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu