https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
This dataset provides comprehensive information about various Data Science and Analytics master's programs offered in the United States. It includes details such as the program name, university name, annual tuition fees, program duration, location of the university, and additional information about the programs.
Column Descriptions:
Subject Name:
The name or field of study of the master's program, such as Data Science, Data Analytics, or Applied Biostatistics.
University Name:
The name of the university offering the master's program.
Per Year Fees:
The tuition fees for the program, usually given in euros per year. For some programs, the fees may be listed as "full" or "full-time," indicating a lump sum for the entire program or for full-time enrollment, respectively.
About Program:
A brief description or overview of the master's program, providing insights into its curriculum, focus areas, and any unique features.
Program Duration:
The duration of the master's program, typically expressed in years or months.
University Location:
The location of the university where the program is offered, including the city and state.
Program Name:
The official name of the master's program, often indicating its degree type (e.g., M.Sc. for Master of Science) and format (e.g., full-time, part-time, online).
In 2023, ** percent of prospective graduate business students in the United States were interested in hybrid programs, an increase from ** percent in 2019. However, the overall preference in 2023 was for in-person business school programs, at ** percent.
In the academic year of 2021/22, about 880,250 students were awarded a Master's degree in the United States. This figure is projected to increase by the academic year of 2031/32, when it is forecasted that 1,000,460 students will be awarded a Master's degree.
A file that holds the master records for all online training courses nominated for reimbursement.
Between 2015 and 2024, the number of bachelor's students who graduated from online universities in Italy steadily increased. In 2015, less than ***** people obtained their bachelor's from an online university. After nine years, the number of students more than doubled, reaching ****** graduates. In Italy, bachelor's students represented the largest group of e-learning university students, ******* people.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
The data relates to the paper that analyses the determinants or factors that best explain student research skills and success in the honours research report module during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The data used have been gathered through an online survey created on the Qualtrics software package. The research questions were developed from demographic factors and subject knowledge including assignments to supervisor influence and other factors in terms of experience or belonging that played a role (see anonymous link at https://unisa.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_86OZZOdyA5sBurY. An SMS was sent to all students of the 2021 module group to make them aware of the survey. They were under no obligation to complete it and all information was regarded as anonymous. We received 39 responses. The raw data from the survey was processed through the SPSS statistical, software package. The data file contains the demographics, frequencies, descriptives, and open questions processed.The study reported in this paper employed the mixed methods approach comprising a quantitative and qualitative analysis. The quantitative and econometric analysis of the dependent variable, namely, the final marks for the research report and the independent variables that explain it. The results show significance in terms of the assignments and existing knowledge marks in terms of their bachelor's average mark. We extended the analysis to a qualitative and quantitative survey, which indicated that the mean statistical feedback was above average and therefore strongly agreed/agreed except for library use by the student. Students, therefore, need more guidance in terms of library use and the open questions showed a need for a research methods course in the future. Furthermore, supervision tends to be a significant determinant in all cases. It is also here where supervisors can use social media instruments such as WhatsApp and Facebook to inform students further. This study contributes as the first to investigate the preparation and research skills of students for master's and doctoral studies during the COVID-19 pandemic in an online environment.
Key indicators of broadband adoption, service and infrastructure in New York City. Data Limitations: Data accuracy is limited as of the date of publication and by the methodology and accuracy of the original sources. The City shall not be liable for any costs related to, or in reliance of, the data contained in these datasets.
Key indicators of the availability of internet service choice and speed based on publicly available data from the Federal Communications Commission Data Limitations: Data accuracy is limited as of the date of publication and by the methodology and accuracy of the original sources. The City shall not be liable for any costs related to, or in reliance of, the data contained in these datasets.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Raw data for the manuscript entitled: European Agrifood and Forestry Education for a Sustainable Future - Gap Analysis from an Informatics Approach Abstract Purpose: To evaluate how well European agrifood and forestry Masters program websites use vocabulary associated with the NextFood Project ‘categories of skills’. Methodology: Web-scraping Python scripts were used to collect texts from European Masters programs websites, which were then analysed using statistical tools including Partial Least Squares Regression and contextual relation analysis. A total of fourteen countries, twenty-seven universities, 1303 European Masters programs, 3305 web-pages and almost two million words were studied using this approach. Findings: While agrifood and forestry Masters programs used vocabulary from the NextFood Project ‘categories of skills’ in most cases equal to or more often than non-agrifood and forestry Masters programs, we found evidence for the relative underuse of words associated with networking skills, with least use among agriculture-related Masters programs. Practical Implications: The informatic approach provides evidence that European agrifood and forestry Masters programs are for the most part following the educational paths for meeting future challenges as outlined by the NextFood Project, with the possible exception of networking skills. Theoretical Implications: This text-based, informatic approach complements the more targeted approaches taken by the NextFood Project in studying the skilling-pathways, which involved focus-group interviews, surveys of stakeholders, interviews of individuals with expert-knowledge and literature reviews. Originality: A text-based, web-scraping informatic approach has thus far been limited in the study of agrifood and forestry higher education, especially relative to recent advances made in the social sciences.
According to a 2023 survey, ** percent of undergraduate students who were studying online in the United States were White, while ** percent were Black or African-American. In comparison, ** percent of graduate students studying online in the United States in that year were White, while ** percent were Black or African American.
The Home Office has changed the format of the published data tables for a number of areas (asylum and resettlement, entry clearance visas, extensions, citizenship, returns, detention, and sponsorship). These now include summary tables, and more detailed datasets (available on a separate page, link below). A list of all available datasets on a given topic can be found in the ‘Contents’ sheet in the ‘summary’ tables. Information on where to find historic data in the ‘old’ format is in the ‘Notes’ page of the ‘summary’ tables.
The Home Office intends to make these changes in other areas in the coming publications. If you have any feedback, please email MigrationStatsEnquiries@homeoffice.gov.uk.
Immigration statistics, year ending June 2020
Immigration Statistics Quarterly Release
Immigration Statistics User Guide
Publishing detailed data tables in migration statistics
Policy and legislative changes affecting migration to the UK: timeline
Immigration statistics data archives
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f6cae16e90e077517f05a5f/asylum-summary-jun-2020-tables.xlsx">Asylum and resettlement summary tables, year ending June 2020 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 121 KB)
Detailed asylum and resettlement datasets
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f3bcb1fe90e0732d9008e25/sponsorship-summary-jun-2020-tables.xlsx">Sponsorship summary tables, year ending June 2020 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 72.4 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f3bcb678fa8f5173cc5f9ed/visas-summary-jun-2020-tables.xlsx">Entry clearance visas summary tables, year ending June 2020 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 64.9 KB)
Detailed entry clearance visas datasets
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f3bcbbae90e0732d9008e26/passenger-arrivals-admissions-summary-jun-2020-tables.xlsx">Passenger arrivals (admissions) summary tables, year ending June 2020 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 76 KB)
Detailed Passengers initially refused entry at port datasets
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f3bcbf18fa8f51747a88061/extentions-summary-jun-2020-tables.xlsx">Extensions summary tables, year ending June 2020 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 42.9 KB)
<a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/managed-
https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
The data relates to the paper that analyses the determinants or factors that best explain student research skills and success in the honours research report module during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The data used have been gathered through an online survey created on the Qualtrics software package. The research questions were developed from demographic factors and subject knowledge including assignments to supervisor influence and other factors in terms of experience or belonging that played a role (see anonymous link at https://unisa.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_86OZZOdyA5sBurY. An SMS was sent to all students of the 2021 module group to make them aware of the survey. They were under no obligation to complete it and all information was regarded as anonymous. We received 39 responses. The raw data from the survey was processed through the SPSS statistical, software package. The data file contains the demographics, frequencies, descriptives, and open questions processed.
The study reported in this paper employed the mixed methods approach comprising a quantitative and qualitative analysis. The quantitative and econometric analysis of the dependent variable, namely, the final marks for the research report and the independent variables that explain it. The results show significance in terms of the assignments and existing knowledge marks in terms of their bachelor’s average mark. We extended the analysis to a qualitative and quantitative survey, which indicated that the mean statistical feedback was above average and therefore strongly agreed/agreed except for library use by the student. Students, therefore, need more guidance in terms of library use and the open questions showed a need for a research methods course in the future. Furthermore, supervision tends to be a significant determinant in all cases. It is also here where supervisors can use social media instruments such as WhatsApp and Facebook to inform students further. This study contributes as the first to investigate the preparation and research skills of students for master's and doctoral studies during the COVID-19 pandemic in an online environment.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The COVID-19 data sets and associated Jupyter Hub notebooks are support for a manuscript describing how data science was shown to be effective in developing a transdisciplinary team and the production of novel outputs in part due to the common learning process of all team members being part of an online professional data science and analytics master’s degree program. This online curriculum helped the team members to find a common process that allowed them learn in common (Kläy, Zimmermann, & Schneider, 2015), transdisciplinary learning a key component of transdisciplinary teamwork (Yeung, 2015). Our team's Jupyter Hub files with complete coding and data set explanations are uploaded to document this teamwork and the outputs of the team.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This file set is the basis of a project in which Stephanie Pywell from The Open University Law School created and evaluated some online teaching materials – Fundamentals of Law (FoLs) – to fill a gap in the knowledge of graduate entrants to the Bachelor of Laws (LLB) programme. These students are granted exemption from the Level 1 law modules, from which they would normally acquire the basic knowledge of legal principles and methods that is essential to success in higher-level study. The materials consisted of 12 sessions of learning, each covering one key topic from a Level 1 law module.The dataset includes a Word document that consists of the text of a five-question, multiple-choice Moodle poll, together with the coding for each response option.The rest of the dataset consists of spreadsheets and outputs from SPSS and Excel showing the analyses that were conducted on the cleaned and anonymised data to ascertain students' use of, and views on, the teaching materials, and to explore any statistical association between students' studying of the materials and their academic success on Level 2 law modules, W202 and W203.Students were asked to complete the Moodle poll at the end of every session of study, of which there were 1,013. Only one answer from each of the 240 respondents was retained for Questions 3, 4 and 5, to avoid skewing the data. Some data are presented as percentages of the number of sessions studied; some are presented as percentages of the number of respondents, and some are presented as percentage of the number of respondents who meet specific criteria.Student identifiers, which have been removed to ensure anonymity, are as follows: Open University Computer User code (OUCU) and Personal Identifier (PI). These were used to collate the output from the Moodle poll with students' Level 2 module results.
IntroductionThe assessment of student outcomes is essential for monitoring the quality of graduate programs in healthcare sciences. As such, this study focused on developing a self-employed questionnaire that allowed for the evaluation of elements focused on career impact and levels of satisfaction regarding graduate program education. Following, this instrument was utilized in a cross-sectional study design with alumni that had obtained their degree (MSc or PhD) over a 25-year span (1995–2020) from a graduate program in dentistry located in Brazil.MethodsThe employed instrument comprised a total of 43 questions presenting a mix of both close and open-ended questions coupled with 5-point Likert scales. The questionnaire was hosted online and a total of 528 alumni were invited to participate through e-mail and social media outreach.Results376 alumni answered the questionnaire (71.2% response rate). The majority were female (69.9%), and with a MSc (58.5%). Levels of satisfaction towards the program as well the impact in career and life were higher in alumni that had obtained a PhD degree compared to MSc. After obtaining the degree, an increase in involvement in teaching/research positions (3.4% vs 21.5%, p < 001) and a decrease in unemployment (21.9% vs 2.1%, p < 001) were observed. The highest levels of impact were observed regarding the achievement of the professional goals as nearly 90% of the population agreed with this statement.ConclusionsThis study highlighted the creation and employment of an assessment tool that can be utilized to monitor the perceptions of student outcomes. Among the findings, a decrease in unemployment and a high degree of career impact and satisfaction were observed in the population of this study. Moving forward, it is essential that monitoring educational outcomes remains a priority worldwide.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This deidentified Excel qualitative data set contains graduate outcomes and graduates' views on the skills they acquired while completing the Women's Health Minor (WHM) at the University of Western Australia (UWA) between 2018 and 2023. Data showed that this self-selected sample of graduates (N=38) had acquired new and diverse skills while completing the WHM.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Flipped classroom models encourage student autonomy and reverse the order of traditional classroom content such as lectures and assignments. Virtual learning environments are ideal for executing flipped classroom models to improve critical thinking skills. This paper provides health professions faculty with guidance on developing a virtual flipped classroom in online graduate nutrition courses between September 2021 and January 2022 at the School of Health Professions, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey. Examples of pre-class, live virtual face-to-face, and post-class activities are provided. Active learning, immediate feedback, and enhanced student engagement in a flipped classroom may result in a more thorough synthesis of information, resulting in increased critical thinking skills. This article describes how a flipped classroom model design in graduate online courses that incorporate virtual face-to-face class sessions in a virtual learning environment can be utilized to promote critical thinking skills. Health professions faculty who teach online can apply the examples discussed to their online courses.
Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset provides Census 2021 estimates for National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SeC) by sex in Northern Ireland. The estimates are as at census day, 21 March 2021.
The census collected information on the usually resident population of Northern Ireland on census day (21 March 2021). Initial contact letters or questionnaire packs were delivered to every household and communal establishment, and residents were asked to complete online or return the questionnaire with information as correct on census day. Special arrangements were made to enumerate special groups such as students, members of the Travellers Community, HM Forces personnel etc. The Census Coverage Survey (an independent doorstep survey) followed between 12 May and 29 June 2021 and was used to adjust the census counts for under-enumeration.
The quality assurance report can be found here
https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/7893/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/7893/terms
This data collection contains energy commodity production statistics for approximately 200 United Nations reporting countries for the years 1970-1979. In this file, each record refers to an individual reporting country and the quantity of its various transactions (e.g., production, imports, exports, bunkers, additions to stocks, and capacity) for a given energy commodity in a given year. Only annual data are included. The 70 types of commodities reported include solid fuels (e.g., coal, peat, and charcoal), liquid fuels (e.g., crude petroleum, gasoline, and kerosene), gases, uranium, and both industrial and public types of geothermal, hydro, and nuclear generated electricity. Information is also included on the population (in thousands) of the reporting country, the quantity of the commodity per transaction, and the date of the transaction. Supplementary data not contained in this data collection are in the introduction and footnotes of the individual tables published in the YEARBOOK OF WORLD ENERGY STATISTICS, 1979.
https://www.factmr.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.factmr.com/privacy-policy
The global massive open online course (MOOC) market size is calculated to advance at a CAGR of 32% through 2034, which is set to increase its market value from US$ 13.2 billion in 2024 to US$ 212.7 billion by the end of 2034.
Report Attribute | Detail |
---|---|
MOOC Market Size (2024E) | US$ 13.2 Billion |
Projected Market Value (2034F) | US$ 212.7 Billion |
Global Market Growth Rate (2024 to 2034) | 32% CAGR |
China Market Value (2034F) | US$ 23.3 Billion |
Japan Market Growth Rate (2024 to 2034) | 32.6% CAGR |
North America Market Share (2024E) | 23.9% |
East Asia Market Value (2034F) | US$ 49.1 Billion |
Key Companies Profiled |
Alison; Coursera Inc; edX Inc; Federica.EU; FutureLearn; Instructure; Intellipaat; iverity; Jigsaw Academy; Kadenze. |
Country Wise Insights
Attribute | United States |
---|---|
Market Value (2024E) | US$ 1.4 Billion |
Growth Rate (2024 to 2034) | 32.5% CAGR |
Projected Value (2034F) | US$ 23.6 Billion |
Attribute | China |
---|---|
Market Value (2024E) | US$ 1.5 Billion |
Growth Rate (2024 to 2034) | 32% CAGR |
Projected Value (2034F) | US$ 23.3 Billion |
Category-wise Insights
Attribute | xMOOC |
---|---|
Segment Value (2024E) | US$ 9.3 Billion |
Growth Rate (2024 to 2034) | 30.8% CAGR |
Projected Value (2034F) | US$ 136.1 Billion |
Attribute | Degree & Master Programs |
---|---|
Segment Value (2024E) | US$ 6.4 Billion |
Growth Rate (2024 to 2034) | 30.2% CAGR |
Projected Value (2034F) | US$ 89.3 Billion |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
This dataset provides comprehensive information about various Data Science and Analytics master's programs offered in the United States. It includes details such as the program name, university name, annual tuition fees, program duration, location of the university, and additional information about the programs.
Column Descriptions:
Subject Name:
The name or field of study of the master's program, such as Data Science, Data Analytics, or Applied Biostatistics.
University Name:
The name of the university offering the master's program.
Per Year Fees:
The tuition fees for the program, usually given in euros per year. For some programs, the fees may be listed as "full" or "full-time," indicating a lump sum for the entire program or for full-time enrollment, respectively.
About Program:
A brief description or overview of the master's program, providing insights into its curriculum, focus areas, and any unique features.
Program Duration:
The duration of the master's program, typically expressed in years or months.
University Location:
The location of the university where the program is offered, including the city and state.
Program Name:
The official name of the master's program, often indicating its degree type (e.g., M.Sc. for Master of Science) and format (e.g., full-time, part-time, online).