82 datasets found
  1. Y-o-y percentage change of online reviews on restaurants in Italy 2018-2019

    • statista.com
    Updated Oct 10, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2019). Y-o-y percentage change of online reviews on restaurants in Italy 2018-2019 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1061118/y-o-y-percentage-change-on-online-reviews-to-restaurants-in-italy/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 10, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Sep 2018 - Aug 2019
    Area covered
    Italy
    Description

    Between ************** and ***********, Google recorded the highest increase in the number of online reviews on restaurants in Italy compared to the reviews published on the platform during the previous 12 months. According to the data, the number of online reviews of restaurants published on Google increased by ** percent. Conversely, the number of online reviews on restaurants published on Tripadvisor decreased by ** percent compared to the previous 12 months.

  2. Information that U.S. internet users find most helpful in product reviews in...

    • statista.com
    Updated May 6, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Information that U.S. internet users find most helpful in product reviews in 2018 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/713308/leading-us-online-review-information/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 6, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Aug 23, 2018 - Sep 3, 2018
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This statistic presents the information that is considered the most helpful in product reviews according to internet users in the United States as of September 2018. According to the findings, 60 percent of respondents stated that information regarding product performance was considered the most helpful when reading reviews, while in comparison 55 percent of respondents reported that purchaser satisfaction was considered to be most useful for them.

  3. u

    Amazon review data 2018

    • cseweb.ucsd.edu
    • nijianmo.github.io
    • +1more
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    UCSD CSE Research Project, Amazon review data 2018 [Dataset]. https://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~jmcauley/datasets/amazon_v2/
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    UCSD CSE Research Project
    Description

    Context

    This Dataset is an updated version of the Amazon review dataset released in 2014. As in the previous version, this dataset includes reviews (ratings, text, helpfulness votes), product metadata (descriptions, category information, price, brand, and image features), and links (also viewed/also bought graphs). In addition, this version provides the following features:

    • More reviews:

      • The total number of reviews is 233.1 million (142.8 million in 2014).
    • New reviews:

      • Current data includes reviews in the range May 1996 - Oct 2018.
    • Metadata: - We have added transaction metadata for each review shown on the review page.

      • Added more detailed metadata of the product landing page.

    Acknowledgements

    If you publish articles based on this dataset, please cite the following paper:

    • Jianmo Ni, Jiacheng Li, Julian McAuley. Justifying recommendations using distantly-labeled reviews and fined-grained aspects. EMNLP, 2019.
  4. ICLR papers and reviews data 2018 2023

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Jan 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    JuanJo Montero (2025). ICLR papers and reviews data 2018 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/juanjomontero/iclr-papers-and-reviews-data-2018-2023
    Explore at:
    zip(55182176 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 9, 2025
    Authors
    JuanJo Montero
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset provides detailed information on links, papers, and peer reviews from the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) for the years 2018 through 2023. The dataset can be used to replicate experiments or conduct new analyses on scientific reviews and decisions from OpenReview.

    Content overview: - iclr_{year}_links.csv: Contains the IDs and links to the articles on OpenReview. - iclr_{year}_papers.csv: Includes the article IDs, titles, and forum identifiers (Forum) on OpenReview. - iclr_{year}_reviews.csv: Provides review data, including: - Forum: The article's unique identifier. - Type: The type of review content (e.g., title, comment, decision, rating). - Content: The text associated with each type.

  5. Average review volume comparison in H1 2018-2019, by industry

    • statista.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista, Average review volume comparison in H1 2018-2019, by industry [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1143351/average-review-volume-comparison-industry/
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    According to 2018 and 2019 industry data, review volume is a deciding factor in terms of business conversion rates. The only notable exceptions are the food & beverage and the retail industry. On average, businesses in the food and beverage segment had *** reviews but only require ** reviews to achieve maximum growth rate. In contrast, service & B2B companies had an average review count of ** and needed ** reviews to achieve maximum growth rate.

  6. Canadians whose purchases are strongly influenced by online reviews...

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Canadians whose purchases are strongly influenced by online reviews 2018-2019 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/444397/review-online-influence-canada/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Oct 2018 - Dec 2019
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    A survey between October 2018 and December 2019 found that 37.3 percent of Canadians felt that online reviews had a major influenced on their shopping decisions. However, approximately 31 percent of survey respondents disagreed that online reviews played a major role in their shopping decisions.

  7. d

    Data from: 2018 A Year In Review

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +1more
    Updated Oct 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.austintexas.gov (2025). 2018 A Year In Review [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/2018-a-year-in-review
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 25, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    data.austintexas.gov
    Description

    Austin Code Department's 2018 Annual Report

  8. d

    Cavallo (2018) \"Scraped Data and Sticky Prices\". Review of Economics and...

    • search.dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Nov 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cavallo, Alberto (2023). Cavallo (2018) \"Scraped Data and Sticky Prices\". Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 100, p.105-119 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IAH6Z6
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 21, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Cavallo, Alberto
    Description

    I use daily prices collected from online retailers in five countries to study the impact of measurement bias on three common price stickiness statistics. Relative to previous results, I find that online prices have longer durations, with fewer price changes close to zero, and hazard functions that initially increase over time. I show that time-averaging and imputed prices in scanner and CPI data can fully explain the differences with the literature. I then report summary statistics for the duration and size of price changes using scraped data collected from 181 retailers in 31 countries.

  9. Amazon Reviews 2018 - Electronics

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated May 24, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Magda Wójcicka (2021). Amazon Reviews 2018 - Electronics [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/magdawjcicka/amazon-reviews-2018-electronics
    Explore at:
    zip(249623758 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 24, 2021
    Authors
    Magda Wójcicka
    Description

    Context

    Dataset is a subset of Amazon Review 2018 dataset. Data used in this project includes reviews for category Electronics. These data have been reduced to extract the 5-core, such that each of the remaining users and items have 5 reviews each. Only part of the data was left.

    Content

    Includes reviews and corresponding ratings. Columns are following:

    • overall - rating of the product (1 to 5)
    • vote - helpful votes of the review
    • reviewText - text of the review
    • summary - summary of the review
    • reviewTime - time of the review (raw)

    Acknowledgements

    Original Data

    Amazon Review Data (2018)

    Source: https://nijianmo.github.io/amazon/index.html
    Description: This Dataset is an updated version of the Amazon review dataset released in 2014.
    As in the previous version, this dataset includes reviews (ratings, text, helpfulness votes),
    product metadata (descriptions, category information, price, brand, and image features), and
    links (also viewed/also bought graphs).

    Original Paper

    Justifying recommendations using distantly-labeled reviews and fined-grained aspects
    Jianmo Ni, Jiacheng Li, Julian McAuley
    Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2019

    Inspiration

    Dataset with reviews and coresponding ratings from 1 to 5 can be used for Sentiment Analysis and other NLP tasks.

  10. d

    2018-2019 Quality Review School List

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.cityofnewyork.us
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 29, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.cityofnewyork.us (2024). 2018-2019 Quality Review School List [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/2018-2019-quality-review-school-list
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 29, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    data.cityofnewyork.us
    Description

    A list of schools receiving Quality Reviews during the 2018-19 school year

  11. Share of consumers reading online reviews or blogs Australia 2011-2018

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Share of consumers reading online reviews or blogs Australia 2011-2018 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/650550/australia-share-of-people-reading-online-reviews-or-blogs/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Australia
    Description

    This statistic displays the proportion of people reading online reviews or blogs in Australia from 2011 to 2018. In 2018, ** percent of respondents stated they read online reviews and blogs.

  12. Amazon Reviews 2018 (Full Dataset)

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Jan 17, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Asido Rogate (2021). Amazon Reviews 2018 (Full Dataset) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/rogate16/amazon-reviews-2018-full-dataset/discussion
    Explore at:
    zip(368363964 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 17, 2021
    Authors
    Asido Rogate
    Description

    This dataset was collected from an open-source Amazon reviews made available by Jianmo Ni

    Preprocess

    The data was originally in JSON, and divided into metadata and reviews. I converted the data into data frame and then join both the metadata and the reviews, before converting it to CSV file. No further process was done afterwards.

    Content

    This dataset contains full reviews from Amazon in 2018, consists of 500000+ reviews from 100000+ users. The columns are pretty much self-explanatory, such as userName, itemName, rating, reviewText, etc

    Task

    This dataset can be used to build a recommender system, since it has the user-item-rating information. This can also be used for NLP tasks, using the reviewText column.

  13. Share of consumers reading online reviews or blogs Australia 2018 by age

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Share of consumers reading online reviews or blogs Australia 2018 by age [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/650581/australia-share-of-people-reading-online-reviews-or-blogs-by-age/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Mar 1, 2018 - Apr 5, 2018
    Area covered
    Australia
    Description

    This statistic displays the proportion of people reading online reviews or blogs in Australia in 2018, by age. That year, ** percent of respondents aged between ** to ** stated they read online reviews and blogs.

  14. g

    Data Portal Annual Review 2018 | gimi9.com

    • gimi9.com
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Portal Annual Review 2018 | gimi9.com [Dataset]. https://gimi9.com/dataset/eu_fb25520a-713c-4185-b445-8282ec344dc5
    Explore at:
    Description

    🇩🇪 독일

  15. Goodreads Book Reviews

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Oct 30, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ahmad (2023). Goodreads Book Reviews [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/pypiahmad/goodreads-book-reviews1
    Explore at:
    zip(8738754435 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 30, 2023
    Authors
    Ahmad
    License

    Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Goodreads Book Reviews dataset encapsulates a wealth of reviews and various attributes concerning the books listed on the Goodreads platform. A distinguishing feature of this dataset is its capture of multiple tiers of user interaction, ranging from adding a book to a "shelf", to rating and reading it. This dataset is a treasure trove for those interested in understanding user behavior, book recommendations, sentiment analysis, and the interplay between various attributes of books and user interactions.

    Basic Statistics: - Items: 1,561,465 - Users: 808,749 - Interactions: 225,394,930

    Metadata: - Reviews: The text of the reviews provided by users. - Add-to-shelf, Read, Review Actions: Various interactions users have with the books. - Book Attributes: Attributes describing the books including title, and ISBN. - Graph of Similar Books: A graph depicting similarity relations between books.

    Example (interaction data): json { "user_id": "8842281e1d1347389f2ab93d60773d4d", "book_id": "130580", "review_id": "330f9c153c8d3347eb914c06b89c94da", "isRead": true, "rating": 4, "date_added": "Mon Aug 01 13:41:57 -0700 2011", "date_updated": "Mon Aug 01 13:42:41 -0700 2011", "read_at": "Fri Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 1988", "started_at": "" }

    Use Cases: - Book Recommendations: Creating personalized book recommendations based on user interactions and preferences. - Sentiment Analysis: Analyzing sentiment in reviews and understanding how different book attributes influence sentiment. - User Behavior Analysis: Understanding user interaction patterns with books and deriving insights to enhance user engagement. - Natural Language Processing: Training models to process and analyze user-generated text in reviews. - Similarity Analysis: Analyzing the graph of similar books to understand book similarities and clustering.

    Citation: Please cite the following if you use the data: Item recommendation on monotonic behavior chains Mengting Wan, Julian McAuley RecSys, 2018 [PDF](https://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~jmcauley/pdfs/recsys18e.pdf)

    Code Samples: A curated set of code samples is provided in the dataset's Github repository, aiding in seamless interaction with the datasets. These include: - Downloading datasets without GUI: Facilitating dataset download in a non-GUI environment. - Displaying Sample Records: Showcasing sample records to get a glimpse of the dataset structure. - Calculating Basic Statistics: Computing basic statistics to understand the dataset's distribution and characteristics. - Exploring the Interaction Data: Delving into interaction data to grasp user-book interaction patterns. - Exploring the Review Data: Analyzing review data to extract valuable insights from user reviews.

    Additional Dataset: - Complete book reviews (~15m multilingual reviews about ~2m books and 465k users): This dataset comprises a comprehensive collection of reviews, showcasing a multilingual facet with reviews about around 2 million books from 465,000 users.

    Datasets:

    Meta-Data of Books:

    • Detailed Book Graph (goodreads_books.json.gz): A comprehensive graph detailing around 2.3 million books, acting as a rich source of book attributes and metadata.
    • Detailed Information of Authors (goodreads_book_authors.json.gz):
      • An extensive dataset containing detailed information about book authors, essential for understanding author-centric trends and insights.
      • Download Link
    • Detailed Information of Works (goodreads_book_works.json.gz):
      • This dataset provides abstract information about a book disregarding any particular editions, facilitating a high-level understanding of each work.
      • Download Link
    • Detailed Information of Book Series (goodreads_book_series.json.gz):
      • A dataset encompassing detailed information about book series, aiding in understanding series-related trends and insights. Note that the series id included here cannot be used for URL hack.
      • Download Link
    • Extracted Fuzzy Book Genres (goodreads_book_genres_initial.json....
  16. d

    School Nutrition Programs - Administrative Review Summary - Program Year...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.texas.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 25, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.austintexas.gov (2024). School Nutrition Programs - Administrative Review Summary - Program Year 2018 - 2019 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/school-nutrition-programs-administrative-review-summary-program-year-2018-2019
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 25, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    data.austintexas.gov
    Description

    About the Dataset This dataset contains: A list of School Food Authorities (SFAs) that have recently undergone Administrative Reviews with TDA, including: Types of school nutrition program operated Special provision programs utilized Whether or not there were Findings This report can be found on SquareMeals Compliance for NSLP for the current program year and will be posted to ODP within three months after the end of the program year.

  17. p

    Saca Online

    • publicschoolreview.com
    json, xml
    Updated Oct 26, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public School Review (2025). Saca Online [Dataset]. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/saca-online-profile
    Explore at:
    json, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 26, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Public School Review
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2017 - Dec 31, 2025
    Description

    Historical Dataset of Saca Online is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (2017-2023),Distribution of Students By Grade Trends,American Indian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2017-2018),Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2017-2023),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2021-2023),White Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2017-2023),Two or More Races Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2019-2020),Diversity Score Comparison Over Years (2017-2023),Graduation Rate Comparison Over Years (2018-2021)

  18. Employee Review

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Feb 2, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Fiodar Ryzhykau (2021). Employee Review [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/fiodarryzhykau/employee-review
    Explore at:
    zip(313547 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 2, 2021
    Authors
    Fiodar Ryzhykau
    License

    http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.htmlhttp://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html

    Description

    Context

    (Disclaimer: Description update and experiments are still in progress).

    The dataset was collected for the research related to Stanford NLU Course, and specifically with the goal to compare the performance of deep-learning transfer models like BERT, GPT-2, ROBERTA and more classic type of models that were previously used for the Sentiment Analysis. The paper could be found here: Leveraging BERT for Multi-Dimensional Sentiment Analysis of Employee Reviews

    Most of the publicly available datasets for the Social Science-related tasks contain mainly statistical data (numeric values or Boolean-type gradation for a particular characteristic). Formal employee reviews usually contain sensitive data that can only be shared with either direct manager or senior members of the company. Such data cannot leave the premises of the company, and thus had to be generated or collected explicitly.

    Data was collected with the help of Amazon MTurk Workers. A custom task was created in order to make sure that there is a good level of variability and quality of data. The task instructions looked as follows: > In this task you’re asked to generate a free-form review for your imaginary colleague. The review should assess employee’s performance for the last quarter by one of ”9-box” categories below. Note: Review should be in English and not shorter than 4 sentences. Avoid using word combinations from the given Category as is (i.e. phrases containing words ”performance” and ”potential”).

    And categories can be visualized like this: https://performanceculture.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/9-box-https.png%20=350x350" alt="9 Box Performance and Potential Model">

    One of the goals of the experiment is to validate how good performance of DL models is on a pretty raw data (without significant cleansing and review), thus current version of Train/Validation dataset is provided, where about 70% of records still need to be reviewed for consistency (i.e. does the feedback actually match provided class).

    Content

    There are 2 main datasets (which do not overlap): 1. Core dataset that was used for Training and Evaluation (partially reviewed, unbalanced distribution of classes) 2. Test dataset (225 records, all reviewed, 25 for each class)

    (train, validation) and test - are enriched datasets that were used in experiments, but using data from 2 main datasets respectively. Train/Validation were obtained via stratified split. Code can be found here: https://github.com/fryzhykau/BERT-employee-reviews-analysis

    Main columns: - id - unique identifier of the record - person_name - imaginary employee name, for which feedback was given - nine_box _category - human-readable 9-box category - feedback - the actual review on the employee - updated or adjusted - whether original category provided by MTurk employee was updated to properly match with the feedback (to sustain high degree of consistency) - reviewed - flag that says whether this record was thoroughly reviewed or not with another pair of eyes

    Additional columns: - label - 0-based nine_box_category id - feedback_len - length of the feedback - num_of_sent - number of sentences in feedback - performance_class - 0-based performance class id - potential_class - 0-based potential class id - feedback_clean - pre-processed feedback value

    Acknowledgements

    Big acknowledgement to my wife Hanna for persistently reviewing the data with me to validate the judgement and achieve the highest level of consistency and quality.

    Inspiration

    I hope this data will help inspire additional ideas in the area of Social Science, and would trigger more "personal-like" data available for a realistic research.

  19. Hotel Reviews

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Jun 24, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Datafiniti (2019). Hotel Reviews [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/datafiniti/hotel-reviews/code?sortBy=hotness&group=everyone
    Explore at:
    zip(13705194 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 24, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Datafiniti
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    About This Data

    This is a list of 1,000 hotels and their reviews provided by Datafiniti's Business Database. The dataset includes hotel location, name, rating, review data, title, username, and more.

    Note that this is a sample of a large dataset. The full dataset is available through Datafiniti.

    What You Can Do With This Data

    You can use this data to compare hotel reviews on a state-by-state basis; experiment with sentiment scoring and other natural language processing techniques. The review data lets you correlate keywords in the review text with ratings. E.g.:

    • What are the bottom and top states for hotel reviews by average rating?
    • What is the correlation between a state’s population and their number of hotel reviews?
    • What is the correlation between a state’s tourism budget and their number of hotel reviews?

    Data Schema

    A full schema for the data is available in our support documentation.

    About Datafiniti

    Datafiniti provides instant access to web data. We compile data from thousands of websites to create standardized databases of business, product, and property information. Learn more.

    Interested in the Full Dataset?

    You can access the full dataset by running the following query with Datafiniti’s Business API.

    { "query": "dateUpdated:[2018-01-01 TO *] AND categories:(Hotel OR Hotels) AND country:US* AND name:* AND reviews:* AND sourceURLs:*", "format": "csv", "download": true }

    **The total number of results may vary.*

    Get this data and more by creating a free Datafiniti account or requesting a demo.

  20. Cumulative number of reviews submitted to Yelp 2009-2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Cumulative number of reviews submitted to Yelp 2009-2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/278032/cumulative-number-of-reviews-submitted-to-yelp/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 15, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    At the end of 2021, a total of 244 million reviews had been submitted to the local business review and recommendation site Yelp, representing a nine percent year-on-year increase from the 224 million reviews at the end of the previous year.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2019). Y-o-y percentage change of online reviews on restaurants in Italy 2018-2019 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1061118/y-o-y-percentage-change-on-online-reviews-to-restaurants-in-italy/
Organization logo

Y-o-y percentage change of online reviews on restaurants in Italy 2018-2019

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Oct 10, 2019
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
Sep 2018 - Aug 2019
Area covered
Italy
Description

Between ************** and ***********, Google recorded the highest increase in the number of online reviews on restaurants in Italy compared to the reviews published on the platform during the previous 12 months. According to the data, the number of online reviews of restaurants published on Google increased by ** percent. Conversely, the number of online reviews on restaurants published on Tripadvisor decreased by ** percent compared to the previous 12 months.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu