Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset provides detailed information on website traffic, including page views, session duration, bounce rate, traffic source, time spent on page, previous visits, and conversion rate.
This dataset can be used for various analyses such as:
This dataset was generated for educational purposes and is not from a real website. It serves as a tool for learning data analysis and machine learning techniques.
Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
Website Traffic Analysis
Website traffic analysis is the process of monitoring and evaluating the visitors to a website. It provides insights into how users are interacting with the site, where they are coming from, which pages they visit most often, and how long they stay. By analyzing this data, businesses can understand user behavior, improve site performance, and optimize content to increase engagement and conversions.
Key metrics include the number of visitors, page views, bounce rate, traffic sources (organic, referral, direct), and geographic location. Website traffic analysis is essential for enhancing SEO, refining marketing strategies, and boosting overall user experience.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/terms-conditions/open-licencehttps://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/terms-conditions/open-licence
Digital technology and Internet use, website traffic strategies, by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and size of enterprise for Canada from 2012 to 2013.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policy
Unlock explosive website growth! Discover the booming $15 billion website traffic analysis tool market, projected to reach $45 billion by 2033. Explore key trends, leading companies (Semrush, Ahrefs, Google Analytics), and regional insights in our comprehensive market analysis.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The size of the Website Traffic Analysis Tool market was valued at USD XXX million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD XXX million by 2033, with an expected CAGR of XX % during the forecast period.
Facebook
TwitterWeb traffic statistics for the top 2000 most visited pages on nyc.gov by month.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Learn how to measure dark social traffic in Google Analytics, which drives 40% of blog visitors. Essential tracking insights for startup founders and content marketers.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
out of which 20 used plaintext HTTP browsing
Facebook
TwitterIn the measured time period, November 2024 saw the highest figures for online traffic to the C2C fashion marketplace vestiairecollective.com. According to the data, desktop and mobile visits to vestiairecollective.com reached **** million visits that month.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Context
The data presented here was obtained in a Kali Machine from University of Cincinnati,Cincinnati,OHIO by carrying out packet captures for 1 hour during the evening on Oct 9th,2023 using Wireshark.This dataset consists of 394137 instances were obtained and stored in a CSV (Comma Separated Values) file.This large dataset could be used utilised for different machine learning applications for instance classification of Network traffic,Network performance monitoring,Network Security Management , Network Traffic Management ,network intrusion detection and anomaly detection.
The dataset can be used for a variety of machine learning tasks, such as network intrusion detection, traffic classification, and anomaly detection.
Content :
This network traffic dataset consists of 7 features.Each instance contains the information of source and destination IP addresses, The majority of the properties are numeric in nature, however there are also nominal and date kinds due to the Timestamp.
The network traffic flow statistics (No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info) were obtained using Wireshark (https://www.wireshark.org/).
Dataset Columns:
No : Number of Instance. Timestamp : Timestamp of instance of network traffic Source IP: IP address of Source Destination IP: IP address of Destination Portocol: Protocol used by the instance Length: Length of Instance Info: Information of Traffic Instance
Acknowledgements :
I would like thank University of Cincinnati for giving the infrastructure for generation of network traffic data set.
Ravikumar Gattu , Susmitha Choppadandi
Inspiration : This dataset goes beyond the majority of network traffic classification datasets, which only identify the type of application (WWW, DNS, ICMP,ARP,RARP) that an IP flow contains. Instead, it generates machine learning models that can identify specific applications (like Tiktok,Wikipedia,Instagram,Youtube,Websites,Blogs etc.) from IP flow statistics (there are currently 25 applications in total).
**Dataset License: ** CC0: Public Domain
Dataset Usages : This dataset can be used for different machine learning applications in the field of cybersecurity such as classification of Network traffic,Network performance monitoring,Network Security Management , Network Traffic Management ,network intrusion detection and anomaly detection.
ML techniques benefits from this Dataset :
This dataset is highly useful because it consists of 394137 instances of network traffic data obtained by using the 25 applications on a public,private and Enterprise networks.Also,the dataset consists of very important features that can be used for most of the applications of Machine learning in cybersecurity.Here are few of the potential machine learning applications that could be benefited from this dataset are :
Network Performance Monitoring : This large network traffic data set can be utilised for analysing the network traffic to identifying the network patterns in the network .This help in designing the network security algorithms for minimise the network probelms.
Anamoly Detection : Large network traffic dataset can be utilised training the machine learning models for finding the irregularitues in the traffic which could help identify the cyber attacks.
3.Network Intrusion Detection : This large dataset could be utilised for machine algorithms training and designing the models for detection of the traffic issues,Malicious traffic network attacks and DOS attacks as well.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
General data recollected for the studio " Analysis of the Quantitative Impact of Social Networks on Web Traffic of Cybermedia in the 27 Countries of the European Union".
Four research questions are posed: what percentage of the total web traffic generated by cybermedia in the European Union comes from social networks? Is said percentage higher or lower than that provided through direct traffic and through the use of search engines via SEO positioning? Which social networks have a greater impact? And is there any degree of relationship between the specific weight of social networks in the web traffic of a cybermedia and circumstances such as the average duration of the user's visit, the number of page views or the bounce rate understood in its formal aspect of not performing any kind of interaction on the visited page beyond reading its content?
To answer these questions, we have first proceeded to a selection of the cybermedia with the highest web traffic of the 27 countries that are currently part of the European Union after the United Kingdom left on December 31, 2020. In each nation we have selected five media using a combination of the global web traffic metrics provided by the tools Alexa (https://www.alexa.com/), which ceased to be operational on May 1, 2022, and SimilarWeb (https:// www.similarweb.com/). We have not used local metrics by country since the results obtained with these first two tools were sufficiently significant and our objective is not to establish a ranking of cybermedia by nation but to examine the relevance of social networks in their web traffic.
In all cases, cybermedia whose property corresponds to a journalistic company have been selected, ruling out those belonging to telecommunications portals or service providers; in some cases they correspond to classic information companies (both newspapers and televisions) while in others they refer to digital natives, without this circumstance affecting the nature of the research proposed.
Below we have proceeded to examine the web traffic data of said cybermedia. The period corresponding to the months of October, November and December 2021 and January, February and March 2022 has been selected. We believe that this six-month stretch allows possible one-time variations to be overcome for a month, reinforcing the precision of the data obtained.
To secure this data, we have used the SimilarWeb tool, currently the most precise tool that exists when examining the web traffic of a portal, although it is limited to that coming from desktops and laptops, without taking into account those that come from mobile devices, currently impossible to determine with existing measurement tools on the market.
It includes:
Web traffic general data: average visit duration, pages per visit and bounce rate Web traffic origin by country Percentage of traffic generated from social media over total web traffic Distribution of web traffic generated from social networks Comparison of web traffic generated from social netwoks with direct and search procedures
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
You can also access an API version of this dataset.
TMS
(traffic monitoring system) daily-updated traffic counts API
Important note: due to the size of this dataset, you won't be able to open it fully in Excel. Use notepad / R / any software package which can open more than a million rows.
Data reuse caveats: as per license.
Data quality
statement: please read the accompanying user manual, explaining:
how
this data is collected identification
of count stations traffic
monitoring technology monitoring
hierarchy and conventions typical
survey specification data
calculation TMS
operation.
Traffic
monitoring for state highways: user manual
[PDF 465 KB]
The data is at daily granularity. However, the actual update
frequency of the data depends on the contract the site falls within. For telemetry
sites it's once a week on a Wednesday. Some regional sites are fortnightly, and
some monthly or quarterly. Some are only 4 weeks a year, with timing depending
on contractors’ programme of work.
Data quality caveats: you must use this data in
conjunction with the user manual and the following caveats.
The
road sensors used in data collection are subject to both technical errors and
environmental interference.Data
is compiled from a variety of sources. Accuracy may vary and the data
should only be used as a guide.As
not all road sections are monitored, a direct calculation of Vehicle
Kilometres Travelled (VKT) for a region is not possible.Data
is sourced from Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency TMS data.For
sites that use dual loops classification is by length. Vehicles with a length of less than 5.5m are
classed as light vehicles. Vehicles over 11m long are classed as heavy
vehicles. Vehicles between 5.5 and 11m are split 50:50 into light and
heavy.In September 2022, the National Telemetry contract was handed to a new contractor. During the handover process, due to some missing documents and aged technology, 40 of the 96 national telemetry traffic count sites went offline. Current contractor has continued to upload data from all active sites and have gradually worked to bring most offline sites back online. Please note and account for possible gaps in data from National Telemetry Sites.
The NZTA Vehicle
Classification Relationships diagram below shows the length classification (typically dual loops) and axle classification (typically pneumatic tube counts),
and how these map to the Monetised benefits and costs manual, table A37,
page 254.
Monetised benefits and costs manual [PDF 9 MB]
For the full TMS
classification schema see Appendix A of the traffic counting manual vehicle
classification scheme (NZTA 2011), below.
Traffic monitoring for state highways: user manual [PDF 465 KB]
State highway traffic monitoring (map)
State highway traffic monitoring sites
Facebook
Twitterhttps://semrush.ebundletools.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/https://semrush.ebundletools.com/company/legal/terms-of-service/
app-measurement.com is ranked #11840 in HK with 25.88K Traffic. Categories: . Learn more about website traffic, market share, and more!
Facebook
TwitterIn the measured time period, November 2025 saw the highest figures for online traffic to the fashion retail website hm.com. According to the data, desktop and mobile visits to hm.com reached nearly *** million visits that month.
Facebook
TwitterThis statistic presents the distribution of global e-commerce sessions as of October 2019, by source and medium. During the measured period, search traffic generated ** percent of total e-commerce session. Overall, ** percent were generated through organic search traffic and ** percent were generated through paid search.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2024, most of the global website traffic was still generated by humans, but bot traffic is constantly growing. Fraudulent traffic through bad bot actors accounted for 37 percent of global web traffic in the most recently measured period, representing an increase of 12 percent from the previous year. Sophistication of Bad Bots on the rise The complexity of malicious bot activity has dramatically increased in recent years. Advanced bad bots have doubled in prevalence over the past 2 years, indicating a surge in the sophistication of cyber threats. Simultaneously, the share of simple bad bots drastically increased over the last years, suggesting a shift in the landscape of automated threats. Meanwhile, areas like food and groceries, sports, gambling, and entertainment faced the highest amount of advanced bad bots, with more than 70 percent of their bot traffic affected by evasive applications. Good and bad bots across industries The impact of bot traffic varies across different sectors. Bad bots accounted for over 50 percent of the telecom and ISPs, community and society, and computing and IT segments web traffic. However, not all bot traffic is considered bad. Some of these applications help index websites for search engines or monitor website performance, assisting users throughout their online search. Therefore, areas like entertainment, food and groceries, and even areas targeted by bad bots themselves experienced notable levels of good bot traffic, demonstrating the diverse applications of benign automated systems across different sectors.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Code:
Packet_Features_Generator.py & Features.py
To run this code:
pkt_features.py [-h] -i TXTFILE [-x X] [-y Y] [-z Z] [-ml] [-s S] -j
-h, --help show this help message and exit -i TXTFILE input text file -x X Add first X number of total packets as features. -y Y Add first Y number of negative packets as features. -z Z Add first Z number of positive packets as features. -ml Output to text file all websites in the format of websiteNumber1,feature1,feature2,... -s S Generate samples using size s. -j
Purpose:
Turns a text file containing lists of incomeing and outgoing network packet sizes into separate website objects with associative features.
Uses Features.py to calcualte the features.
startMachineLearning.sh & machineLearning.py
To run this code:
bash startMachineLearning.sh
This code then runs machineLearning.py in a tmux session with the nessisary file paths and flags
Options (to be edited within this file):
--evaluate-only to test 5 fold cross validation accuracy
--test-scaling-normalization to test 6 different combinations of scalers and normalizers
Note: once the best combination is determined, it should be added to the data_preprocessing function in machineLearning.py for future use
--grid-search to test the best grid search hyperparameters - note: the possible hyperparameters must be added to train_model under 'if not evaluateOnly:' - once best hyperparameters are determined, add them to train_model under 'if evaluateOnly:'
Purpose:
Using the .ml file generated by Packet_Features_Generator.py & Features.py, this program trains a RandomForest Classifier on the provided data and provides results using cross validation. These results include the best scaling and normailzation options for each data set as well as the best grid search hyperparameters based on the provided ranges.
Data
Encrypted network traffic was collected on an isolated computer visiting different Wikipedia and New York Times articles, different Google search queres (collected in the form of their autocomplete results and their results page), and different actions taken on a Virtual Reality head set.
Data for this experiment was stored and analyzed in the form of a txt file for each experiment which contains:
First number is a classification number to denote what website, query, or vr action is taking place.
The remaining numbers in each line denote:
The size of a packet,
and the direction it is traveling.
negative numbers denote incoming packets
positive numbers denote outgoing packets
Figure 4 Data
This data uses specific lines from the Virtual Reality.txt file.
The action 'LongText Search' refers to a user searching for "Saint Basils Cathedral" with text in the Wander app.
The action 'ShortText Search' refers to a user searching for "Mexico" with text in the Wander app.
The .xlsx and .csv file are identical
Each file includes (from right to left):
The origional packet data,
each line of data organized from smallest to largest packet size in order to calculate the mean and standard deviation of each packet capture,
and the final Cumulative Distrubution Function (CDF) caluclation that generated the Figure 4 Graph.
Facebook
Twitter
Facebook
TwitterThis edition of the Traffic Monitoring Guide (TMG) is intended to provide the most up-to-date guidance to State highway agencies about the policies, standards, procedures, reporting, and equipment utilized in a traffic monitoring program. The TMG presents recommendations that help improve and advance current programs with a view toward the future of traffic monitoring and with consideration for transportation regulations resulting from the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act and its predecessors.The needs for traffic monitoring data at both the Federal, State, and local levels require that agencies have a well-designed traffic monitoring program. Traffic data are needed to assess current and past system performance and to predict future performance. Improved traffic data, including data on ramps, are needed for reporting in the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS), and there are now opportunities to use traffic data acquired from Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) to support coordination of planning and operations functions at the various agency levels.Continued improvements in traffic data collection technology have allowed States to improve their data collection processes and to streamline quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures. New technology also enables States to collect data on micromobility traffic, including bicycle and pedestrian traffic. The use of micromobility traffic data supports analyses regarding the impacts to the transportation network (on volumes and safety) resulting from the use of bicycles and other micromobility devices as alternative travel methods. The new technologies and procedures for traffic monitoring presented in the TMG are supplemented with practical examples from State experiences to improve traffic monitoring programs.The TMG is written to assist both experienced traffic data collection personnel and those who are less experienced or new to traffic data collection. Reference material that will benefit traffic data collection programs is found in the Appendices.This edition of the TMG also includes data formats for reporting traffic data, including the Individual Vehicle Record (IVR) format for reporting volume, vehicle speed, vehicle classification, and vehicle weight data. Data formats are also provided for reporting micromobility data for those agencies with capabilities to collect this type of data. This edition of the TMG has been developed with considerable input from State traffic data program managers. This approach has resulted in a practical guidance document that FHWA anticipates will be helpful to States in improving their business processes, technology, and equipment used to successfully manage their traffic monitoring programs.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset provides detailed information on website traffic, including page views, session duration, bounce rate, traffic source, time spent on page, previous visits, and conversion rate.
This dataset can be used for various analyses such as:
This dataset was generated for educational purposes and is not from a real website. It serves as a tool for learning data analysis and machine learning techniques.