10 datasets found
  1. r

    Open Access Series of Imaging Studies

    • rrid.site
    • scicrunch.org
    • +2more
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Open Access Series of Imaging Studies [Dataset]. http://identifiers.org/RRID:SCR_007385
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Description

    Project aimed at making neuroimaging data sets of brain freely available to scientific community. By compiling and freely distributing neuroimaging data sets, future discoveries in basic and clinical neuroscience are facilitated.

  2. MRI and Alzheimers

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Aug 16, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jacob Boysen (2017). MRI and Alzheimers [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jboysen/mri-and-alzheimers/data?select=oasis_longitudinal.csv
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Aug 16, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    Kaggle
    Authors
    Jacob Boysen
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Context:

    The Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS) is a project aimed at making MRI data sets of the brain freely available to the scientific community. By compiling and freely distributing MRI data sets, we hope to facilitate future discoveries in basic and clinical neuroscience. OASIS is made available by the Washington University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Dr. Randy Buckner at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)( at Harvard University, the Neuroinformatics Research Group (NRG) at Washington University School of Medicine, and the Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN).

    Content:

    • Cross-sectional MRI Data in Young, Middle Aged, Nondemented and Demented Older Adults: This set consists of a cross-sectional collection of 416 subjects aged 18 to 96. For each subject, 3 or 4 individual T1-weighted MRI scans obtained in single scan sessions are included. The subjects are all right-handed and include both men and women. 100 of the included subjects over the age of 60 have been clinically diagnosed with very mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Additionally, a reliability data set is included containing 20 nondemented subjects imaged on a subsequent visit within 90 days of their initial session.
    • Longitudinal MRI Data in Nondemented and Demented Older Adults: This set consists of a longitudinal collection of 150 subjects aged 60 to 96. Each subject was scanned on two or more visits, separated by at least one year for a total of 373 imaging sessions. For each subject, 3 or 4 individual T1-weighted MRI scans obtained in single scan sessions are included. The subjects are all right-handed and include both men and women. 72 of the subjects were characterized as nondemented throughout the study. 64 of the included subjects were characterized as demented at the time of their initial visits and remained so for subsequent scans, including 51 individuals with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Another 14 subjects were characterized as nondemented at the time of their initial visit and were subsequently characterized as demented at a later visit.

    Acknowledgements:

    When publishing findings that benefit from OASIS data, please include the following grant numbers in the acknowledgements section and in the associated Pubmed Central submission: P50 AG05681, P01 AG03991, R01 AG021910, P20 MH071616, U24 RR0213

    Inspiration:

    Can you predict dementia? Alzheimer’s?

  3. Z

    Denoised brains of the OASIS dataset post-classification

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • datadryad.org
    Updated Jun 2, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Hur, Matthew (2022). Denoised brains of the OASIS dataset post-classification [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_3963216
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Hur, Matthew
    Aghajanyan, Armen
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    These brains have been classified by IVAM and denoised using an Ising model.

  4. f

    DataSheet_1_A Biomarker for Alzheimer’s Disease Based on Patterns of...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stefan Frenzel; Katharina Wittfeld; Mohamad Habes; Johanna Klinger-König; Robin Bülow; Henry Völzke; Hans Jörgen Grabe (2023). DataSheet_1_A Biomarker for Alzheimer’s Disease Based on Patterns of Regional Brain Atrophy.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00953.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Stefan Frenzel; Katharina Wittfeld; Mohamad Habes; Johanna Klinger-König; Robin Bülow; Henry Völzke; Hans Jörgen Grabe
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Introduction: It has been shown that Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is accompanied by marked structural brain changes that can be detected several years before clinical diagnosis via structural magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. In this study, we developed a structural MR-based biomarker for in vivo detection of AD using a supervised machine learning approach. Based on an individual’s pattern of brain atrophy a continuous AD score is assigned which measures the similarity with brain atrophy patterns seen in clinical cases of AD.Methods: The underlying statistical model was trained with MR scans of patients and healthy controls from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI-1 screening). Validation was performed within ADNI-1 and in an independent patient sample from the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS-1). In addition, our analyses included data from a large general population sample of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-Trend).Results: Based on the proposed AD score we were able to differentiate patients from healthy controls in ADNI-1 and OASIS-1 with an accuracy of 89% (AUC = 95%) and 87% (AUC = 93%), respectively. Moreover, we found the AD score to be significantly associated with cognitive functioning as assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination in the OASIS-1 sample after correcting for diagnosis, age, sex, age·sex, and total intracranial volume (Cohen’s f2 = 0.13). Additional analyses showed that the prediction accuracy of AD status based on both the AD score and the MMSE score is significantly higher than when using just one of them. In SHIP-Trend we found the AD score to be weakly but significantly associated with a test of verbal memory consisting of an immediate and a delayed word list recall (again after correcting for age, sex, age·sex, and total intracranial volume, Cohen’s f2 = 0.009). This association was mainly driven by the immediate recall performance.Discussion: In summary, our proposed biomarker well differentiated between patients and healthy controls in an independent test sample. It was associated with measures of cognitive functioning both in a patient sample and a general population sample. Our approach might be useful for defining robust MR-based biomarkers for other neurodegenerative diseases, too.

  5. f

    Information for OASIS and IBSR datasets.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bumshik Lee; Nagaraj Yamanakkanavar; Jae Young Choi (2023). Information for OASIS and IBSR datasets. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236493.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Bumshik Lee; Nagaraj Yamanakkanavar; Jae Young Choi
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Information for OASIS and IBSR datasets.

  6. f

    Proportions of differing classifications by lobe.

    • figshare.com
    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    David Alexander Dickie; Dominic E. Job; David Rodriguez Gonzalez; Susan D. Shenkin; Joanna M. Wardlaw (2023). Proportions of differing classifications by lobe. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127939.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    David Alexander Dickie; Dominic E. Job; David Rodriguez Gonzalez; Susan D. Shenkin; Joanna M. Wardlaw
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Note: P = parametric; NP = nonparametric; ADNI = Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; OASIS = Open Access Series of Imaging Studies. Rounding errors mean that not all rows in this table sum to exactly 1.Proportions of differing classifications by lobe.

  7. f

    Segmentation result comparisons between the proposed, the conventional...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bumshik Lee; Nagaraj Yamanakkanavar; Jae Young Choi (2023). Segmentation result comparisons between the proposed, the conventional U-net, and SegNet based methods for OASIS and IBSR datasets (DSC: Dice Similarity Coefficient, JI: Jaccard Index, MSE: Mean Square error, GM: Grey Matter, WM: White Mater, CSF: Cerebrospinal Fluid, HD: Hausdorff distance). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236493.t005
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Bumshik Lee; Nagaraj Yamanakkanavar; Jae Young Choi
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Segmentation result comparisons between the proposed, the conventional U-net, and SegNet based methods for OASIS and IBSR datasets (DSC: Dice Similarity Coefficient, JI: Jaccard Index, MSE: Mean Square error, GM: Grey Matter, WM: White Mater, CSF: Cerebrospinal Fluid, HD: Hausdorff distance).

  8. f

    Description of multimodal dataset.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Nov 16, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sobhana Jahan; Kazi Abu Taher; M. Shamim Kaiser; Mufti Mahmud; Md. Sazzadur Rahman; A. S. M. Sanwar Hosen; In-Ho Ra (2023). Description of multimodal dataset. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294253.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Sobhana Jahan; Kazi Abu Taher; M. Shamim Kaiser; Mufti Mahmud; Md. Sazzadur Rahman; A. S. M. Sanwar Hosen; In-Ho Ra
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundAccording to the World Health Organization (WHO), dementia is the seventh leading reason of death among all illnesses and one of the leading causes of disability among the world’s elderly people. Day by day the number of Alzheimer’s patients is rising. Considering the increasing rate and the dangers, Alzheimer’s disease should be diagnosed carefully. Machine learning is a potential technique for Alzheimer’s diagnosis but general users do not trust machine learning models due to the black-box nature. Even, some of those models do not provide the best performance because of using only neuroimaging data.ObjectiveTo solve these issues, this paper proposes a novel explainable Alzheimer’s disease prediction model using a multimodal dataset. This approach performs a data-level fusion using clinical data, MRI segmentation data, and psychological data. However, currently, there is very little understanding of multimodal five-class classification of Alzheimer’s disease.MethodFor predicting five class classifications, 9 most popular Machine Learning models are used. These models are Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Gradient Boosting (GB), Adaptive Boosting (AdaB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Naive Bayes (NB). Among these models RF has scored the highest value. Besides for explainability, SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) is used in this research work.Results and conclusionsThe performance evaluation demonstrates that the RF classifier has a 10-fold cross-validation accuracy of 98.81% for predicting Alzheimer’s disease, cognitively normal, non-Alzheimer’s dementia, uncertain dementia, and others. In addition, the study utilized Explainable Artificial Intelligence based on the SHAP model and analyzed the causes of prediction. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to present this multimodal (Clinical, Psychological, and MRI segmentation data) five-class classification of Alzheimer’s disease using Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS-3) dataset. Besides, a novel Alzheimer’s patient management architecture is also proposed in this work.

  9. f

    Features selection on multimodal dataset.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Nov 16, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sobhana Jahan; Kazi Abu Taher; M. Shamim Kaiser; Mufti Mahmud; Md. Sazzadur Rahman; A. S. M. Sanwar Hosen; In-Ho Ra (2023). Features selection on multimodal dataset. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294253.t006
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Sobhana Jahan; Kazi Abu Taher; M. Shamim Kaiser; Mufti Mahmud; Md. Sazzadur Rahman; A. S. M. Sanwar Hosen; In-Ho Ra
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundAccording to the World Health Organization (WHO), dementia is the seventh leading reason of death among all illnesses and one of the leading causes of disability among the world’s elderly people. Day by day the number of Alzheimer’s patients is rising. Considering the increasing rate and the dangers, Alzheimer’s disease should be diagnosed carefully. Machine learning is a potential technique for Alzheimer’s diagnosis but general users do not trust machine learning models due to the black-box nature. Even, some of those models do not provide the best performance because of using only neuroimaging data.ObjectiveTo solve these issues, this paper proposes a novel explainable Alzheimer’s disease prediction model using a multimodal dataset. This approach performs a data-level fusion using clinical data, MRI segmentation data, and psychological data. However, currently, there is very little understanding of multimodal five-class classification of Alzheimer’s disease.MethodFor predicting five class classifications, 9 most popular Machine Learning models are used. These models are Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Gradient Boosting (GB), Adaptive Boosting (AdaB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Naive Bayes (NB). Among these models RF has scored the highest value. Besides for explainability, SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) is used in this research work.Results and conclusionsThe performance evaluation demonstrates that the RF classifier has a 10-fold cross-validation accuracy of 98.81% for predicting Alzheimer’s disease, cognitively normal, non-Alzheimer’s dementia, uncertain dementia, and others. In addition, the study utilized Explainable Artificial Intelligence based on the SHAP model and analyzed the causes of prediction. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to present this multimodal (Clinical, Psychological, and MRI segmentation data) five-class classification of Alzheimer’s disease using Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS-3) dataset. Besides, a novel Alzheimer’s patient management architecture is also proposed in this work.

  10. f

    Statistical analysis of features.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Nov 16, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sobhana Jahan; Kazi Abu Taher; M. Shamim Kaiser; Mufti Mahmud; Md. Sazzadur Rahman; A. S. M. Sanwar Hosen; In-Ho Ra (2023). Statistical analysis of features. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294253.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Sobhana Jahan; Kazi Abu Taher; M. Shamim Kaiser; Mufti Mahmud; Md. Sazzadur Rahman; A. S. M. Sanwar Hosen; In-Ho Ra
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundAccording to the World Health Organization (WHO), dementia is the seventh leading reason of death among all illnesses and one of the leading causes of disability among the world’s elderly people. Day by day the number of Alzheimer’s patients is rising. Considering the increasing rate and the dangers, Alzheimer’s disease should be diagnosed carefully. Machine learning is a potential technique for Alzheimer’s diagnosis but general users do not trust machine learning models due to the black-box nature. Even, some of those models do not provide the best performance because of using only neuroimaging data.ObjectiveTo solve these issues, this paper proposes a novel explainable Alzheimer’s disease prediction model using a multimodal dataset. This approach performs a data-level fusion using clinical data, MRI segmentation data, and psychological data. However, currently, there is very little understanding of multimodal five-class classification of Alzheimer’s disease.MethodFor predicting five class classifications, 9 most popular Machine Learning models are used. These models are Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Gradient Boosting (GB), Adaptive Boosting (AdaB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Naive Bayes (NB). Among these models RF has scored the highest value. Besides for explainability, SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) is used in this research work.Results and conclusionsThe performance evaluation demonstrates that the RF classifier has a 10-fold cross-validation accuracy of 98.81% for predicting Alzheimer’s disease, cognitively normal, non-Alzheimer’s dementia, uncertain dementia, and others. In addition, the study utilized Explainable Artificial Intelligence based on the SHAP model and analyzed the causes of prediction. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to present this multimodal (Clinical, Psychological, and MRI segmentation data) five-class classification of Alzheimer’s disease using Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS-3) dataset. Besides, a novel Alzheimer’s patient management architecture is also proposed in this work.

  11. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
(2025). Open Access Series of Imaging Studies [Dataset]. http://identifiers.org/RRID:SCR_007385

Open Access Series of Imaging Studies

RRID:SCR_007385, nif-0000-00387, Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (RRID:SCR_007385), OASIS, The Open Access Series of Imaging Studies, Open Access Series of Imaging Studies, OASIS

Explore at:
5 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Mar 12, 2025
Description

Project aimed at making neuroimaging data sets of brain freely available to scientific community. By compiling and freely distributing neuroimaging data sets, future discoveries in basic and clinical neuroscience are facilitated.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu