Sensitive Regulated Data: Permitted and Restricted UsesPurposeScope and AuthorityStandardViolation of the Standard - Misuse of InformationDefinitionsReferencesAppendix A: Personally Identifiable Information (PII)Appendix B: Security of Personally Owned Devices that Access or Maintain Sensitive Restricted DataAppendix C: Sensitive Security Information (SSI)

This dataset is a compilation of address point data for the City of Tempe. The dataset contains a point location, the official address (as defined by The Building Safety Division of Community Development) for all occupiable units and any other official addresses in the City. There are several additional attributes that may be populated for an address, but they may not be populated for every address. Contact: Lynn Flaaen-Hanna, Development Services Specialist Contact E-mail Link: Map that Lets You Explore and Export Address Data Data Source: The initial dataset was created by combining several datasets and then reviewing the information to remove duplicates and identify errors. This published dataset is the system of record for Tempe addresses going forward, with the address information being created and maintained by The Building Safety Division of Community Development.Data Source Type: ESRI ArcGIS Enterprise GeodatabasePreparation Method: N/APublish Frequency: WeeklyPublish Method: AutomaticData Dictionary

The Division of Drinking Water (DDW) identifies Failing and At-Risk community water systems and K-12 non-transient, non-community schools. This information is displayed online in the Safe and Affordable Funding for Equity and Resilience (SAFER) Dashboard. The data utilized for this assessment is derived from multiple sources: self-reported from water systems, data generated by DDW staff, other California state agencies, and U.S. Census. The data sources, calculation methods, Failing and At-Risk criteria, etc. are fully documented in the annual Drinking Water Needs Assessment report which is published annually on the State Water Board’s website.

Monthly report on DOC security indicators.

City of Tempe Security and Privacy Worksheet includes:Section 1: DATASET NAME Section 2. PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION QUESTIONS Section 3. SECURITY: PROTECTED DATA Section 4. SECURITY: SENSITIVE DATA

Note: This dataset was deprecated effective April 30, 2025. Please refer to the Calls for Service (Consolidated) dataset for current data and access to historical records, including prior reporting years.Archive of Calls for Service data from 2012 to 2019 provided as a single source. Staging for sub-layers for specified time periods.

This data set contains data, HTML and document files downloaded and saved from the first incarnation of the Deep Space 1 Data web site. These data, despite superficial appearances, are not in a PDS standard format, nor is there sufficient documentation on format or content to prepare the data for external review or proper archiving. The bits were saved before the web site disappeared (c.2004) without explanation, in the hopes that resources could be found to decipher them.

Open Data Handbook for Tempe Open Data includes:IntroRoles and ResponsibilitiesData Management ProcessReferences

Snapshot img

Government Open Data Management Platform Market Size 2025-2029

The government open data management platform market size is forecast to increase by USD 189.4 million at a CAGR of 12.5% between 2024 and 2029.

The market is witnessing significant growth, driven by the increasing demand for digitalization in government operations. This trend is leading to an increased adoption of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, in open data management platforms. These technologies enable more efficient data processing, analysis, and dissemination, making it easier for governments to provide accessible and actionable data to the public. However, the market faces challenges related to data privacy concerns.
Additionally, there is a need for clear guidelines and regulations regarding the collection, storage, and sharing of open data to maintain transparency and trust with the public. Companies operating in this market can capitalize on the growing demand for digitalization and advanced technologies while addressing data privacy concerns to gain a competitive edge. With the growing availability of open data, ensuring the security and confidentiality of sensitive information is a major concern. Governments must implement robust security measures to protect data from unauthorized access, misuse, or theft. Computer vision and image recognition are transforming industries like healthcare and education.

What will be the Size of the Government Open Data Management Platform Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free Sample

The market for government open data management platforms continues to evolve, driven by the increasing importance of public data infrastructure and the need for effective data governance policies. Data privacy regulations are shaping the landscape, with a growing emphasis on data reuse promotion and performance benchmarking. Data aggregation methods and data usage patterns are under constant review, as transparency and system scalability become essential. Data storytelling techniques and data usability assessments are gaining traction, while data platform architecture and data integration tools are being refined. A recent study revealed a 25% increase in data accessibility features adoption among government agencies.

Industry growth is expected to reach 15% annually, as open data licensing, role-based access control, and data modeling techniques become standard. Data quality monitoring, data consistency, and data reliability remain key concerns, with data audit procedures and data integrity measures being implemented to address these challenges. Data contextualization and data visualization dashboards are essential for making sense of the vast amounts of data being generated, while open government initiatives continue to drive innovation and collaboration. Data security remains a priority, with privacy concerns driving the need for data mining and edge computing.

How is this Government Open Data Management Platform Industry segmented?

The government open data management platform industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

End-user

  Large enterprises
  SMEs


Deployment

  On-premises
  Cloud-based


Component

  Solutions
  Services


Geography

  North America

    US
    Canada
    Mexico


  Europe

    France
    Germany
    Italy
    UK


  APAC

    Australia
    China
    India


  Rest of World (ROW)

By End-user Insights

The Large enterprises segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. In today's data-driven business landscape, large enterprises are increasingly turning to government open data management platforms to unlock valuable insights and fuel innovation. These platforms enable organizations to access, manage, and analyze vast amounts of data published by government agencies. By integrating government open data with their internal data, businesses can gain a deeper understanding of market trends, consumer behavior, and emerging opportunities. Data interoperability and version control ensure seamless integration of diverse data sources, while data migration strategies facilitate the transfer of data between systems. Data lineage tracking and metadata management provide transparency into the origin and evolution of data, enabling data provenance management and data discovery. Advanced process control and time series forecasting are integral to this evolution, with machine learning algorithms and deep learning frameworks powering predictive analytics tools.

Structured data management, data clea

This piece is a case study from participating in the Replication Games, an organised open science initiative to replicate published papers on Nature Communications.Full transparency of data is highly regarded for open science practices. However, in the attempt of replicating studies using publicly available open data, we noticed the handling of sensitive data is often overlooked. For example, there is very few data minimisation practices, no acknowledging of the 5 safe principles, and a lack of consideration of the risks of disclosure of personal information and re-identification. This poster presents a case study of published open data assessing how identifiable are the anonymised participants, against potential linkage attacks or other techniques. I examine the level of anonymity of a dataset using common techniques.There is a lack of researcher and public awareness of the risks of linkage attacks, and how researchers could ethically manage their data to mitigate these risks, and communicate them proportionately with research participants..Researchers have the responsibility to proportionately and safely share open participant data.

City of Tempe Open Data Terms of Use document includes:Terms of UseData Rights and UsageSecondary UseRight to LimitChangesModeration NoticeDisclaimer of WarrantiesLimitations on LiabilityNo Waiver Rights

On August 25th, 2022, Metro Council Passed Open Data Ordinance; previously open data reports were published on Mayor Fischer's Executive Order, You can find here both the Open Data Ordinance, 2022 (PDF) and the Mayor's Open Data Executive Order, 2013 Open Data Annual ReportsPage 6 of the Open Data Ordinance, Within one year of the effective date of this Ordinance, and thereafter no later than September1 of each year, the Open Data Management Team shall submit to the Mayor and Metro Council an annual Open Data Report.The Open Data Management team (also known as the Data Governance Team is currently led by the city's Data Officer Andrew McKinney in the Office of Civic Innovation and Technology. Previously, it was led by the former Data Officer, Michael Schnuerle and prior to that by Director of IT.Open Data Ordinance O-243-22 TextLouisville Metro GovernmentLegislation TextFile #: O-243-22, Version: 3ORDINANCE NO._, SERIES 2022AN ORDINANCE CREATING A NEW CHAPTER OF THE LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSONCOUNTY METRO CODE OF ORDINANCES CREATING AN OPEN DATA POLICYAND REVIEW. (AMENDMENT BY SUBSTITUTION)(AS AMENDED).SPONSORED BY: COUNCIL MEMBERS ARTHUR, WINKLER, CHAMBERS ARMSTRONG,PIAGENTINI, DORSEY, AND PRESIDENT JAMESWHEREAS, Metro Government is the catalyst for creating a world-class city that provides itscitizens with safe and vibrant neighborhoods, great jobs, a strong system of education and innovationand a high quality of life;WHEREAS, it should be easy to do business with Metro Government. Online governmentinteractions mean more convenient services for citizens and businesses and online governmentinteractions improve the cost effectiveness and accuracy of government operations;WHEREAS, an open government also makes certain that every aspect of the builtenvironment also has reliable digital descriptions available to citizens and entrepreneurs for deepengagement mediated by smart devices;WHEREAS, every citizen has the right to prompt, efficient service from Metro Government;WHEREAS, the adoption of open standards improves transparency, access to publicinformation and improved coordination and efficiencies among Departments and partnerorganizations across the public, non-profit and private sectors;WHEREAS, by publishing structured standardized data in machine readable formats, MetroGovernment seeks to encourage the local technology community to develop software applicationsand tools to display, organize, analyze, and share public record data in new and innovative ways;WHEREAS, Metro Government’s ability to review data and datasets will facilitate a betterUnderstanding of the obstacles the city faces with regard to equity;WHEREAS, Metro Government’s understanding of inequities, through data and datasets, willassist in creating better policies to tackle inequities in the city;WHEREAS, through this Ordinance, Metro Government desires to maintain its continuousimprovement in open data and transparency that it initiated via Mayoral Executive Order No. 1,Series 2013;WHEREAS, Metro Government’s open data work has repeatedly been recognized asevidenced by its achieving What Works Cities Silver (2018), Gold (2019), and Platinum (2020)certifications. What Works Cities recognizes and celebrates local governments for their exceptionaluse of data to inform policy and funding decisions, improve services, create operational efficiencies,and engage residents. The Certification program assesses cities on their data-driven decisionmakingpractices, such as whether they are using data to set goals and track progress, allocatefunding, evaluate the effectiveness of programs, and achieve desired outcomes. These datainformedstrategies enable Certified Cities to be more resilient, respond in crisis situations, increaseeconomic mobility, protect public health, and increase resident satisfaction; andWHEREAS, in commitment to the spirit of Open Government, Metro Government will considerpublic information to be open by default and will proactively publish data and data containinginformation, consistent with the Kentucky Open Meetings and Open Records Act.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THELOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT AS FOLLOWS:SECTION I: A new chapter of the Louisville Metro Code of Ordinances (“LMCO”) mandatingan Open Data Policy and review process is hereby created as follows:§ XXX.01 DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this Chapter, the following definitions shall apply unlessthe context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning.OPEN DATA. Any public record as defined by the Kentucky Open Records Act, which could bemade available online using Open Format data, as well as best practice Open Data structures andformats when possible, that is not Protected Information or Sensitive Information, with no legalrestrictions on use or reuse. Open Data is not information that is treated as exempt under KRS61.878 by Metro Government.OPEN DATA REPORT. The annual report of the Open Data Management Team, which shall (i)summarize and comment on the state of Open Data availability in Metro Government Departmentsfrom the previous year, including, but not limited to, the progress toward achieving the goals of MetroGovernment’s Open Data portal, an assessment of the current scope of compliance, a list of datasetscurrently available on the Open Data portal and a description and publication timeline for datasetsenvisioned to be published on the portal in the following year; and (ii) provide a plan for the next yearto improve online public access to Open Data and maintain data quality.OPEN DATA MANAGEMENT TEAM. A group consisting of representatives from each Departmentwithin Metro Government and chaired by the Data Officer who is responsible for coordinatingimplementation of an Open Data Policy and creating the Open Data Report.DATA COORDINATORS. The members of an Open Data Management Team facilitated by theData Officer and the Office of Civic Innovation and Technology.DEPARTMENT. Any Metro Government department, office, administrative unit, commission, board,advisory committee, or other division of Metro Government.DATA OFFICER. The staff person designated by the city to coordinate and implement the city’sopen data program and policy.DATA. The statistical, factual, quantitative or qualitative information that is maintained or created byor on behalf of Metro Government.DATASET. A named collection of related records, with the collection containing data organized orformatted in a specific or prescribed way.METADATA. Contextual information that makes the Open Data easier to understand and use.OPEN DATA PORTAL. The internet site established and maintained by or on behalf of MetroGovernment located at https://data.louisvilleky.gov/ or its successor website.OPEN FORMAT. Any widely accepted, nonproprietary, searchable, platform-independent, machinereadablemethod for formatting data which permits automated processes.PROTECTED INFORMATION. Any Dataset or portion thereof to which the Department may denyaccess pursuant to any law, rule or regulation.SENSITIVE INFORMATION. Any Data which, if published on the Open Data Portal, could raiseprivacy, confidentiality or security concerns or have the potential to jeopardize public health, safety orwelfare to an extent that is greater than the potential public benefit of publishing that data.§ XXX.02 OPEN DATA PORTAL(A) The Open Data Portal shall serve as the authoritative source for Open Data provided by MetroGovernment.(B) Any Open Data made accessible on Metro Government’s Open Data Portal shall use an OpenFormat.(C) In the event a successor website is used, the Data Officer shall notify the Metro Council andshall provide notice to the public on the main city website.§ XXX.03 OPEN DATA MANAGEMENT TEAM(A) The Data Officer of Metro Government will work with the head of each Department to identify aData Coordinator in each Department. The Open Data Management Team will work to establish arobust, nationally recognized, platform that addresses digital infrastructure and Open Data.(B) The Open Data Management Team will develop an Open Data Policy that will adopt prevailingOpen Format standards for Open Data and develop agreements with regional partners to publish andmaintain Open Data that is open and freely available while respecting exemptions allowed by theKentucky Open Records Act or other federal or state law.§ XXX.04 DEPARTMENT OPEN DATA CATALOGUE(A) Each Department shall retain ownership over the Datasets they submit to the Open DataPortal. The Departments shall also be responsible for all aspects of the quality, integrity and securityPortal. The Departments shall also be responsible for all aspects of the quality, integrity and securityof the Dataset contents, including updating its Data and associated Metadata.(B) Each Department shall be responsible for creating an Open Data catalogue which shall includecomprehensive inventories of information possessed and/or managed by the Department.(C) Each Department’s Open Data catalogue will classify information holdings as currently “public”or “not yet public;” Departments will work with the Office of Civic Innovation and Technology todevelop strategies and timelines for publishing Open Data containing information in a way that iscomplete, reliable and has a high level of detail.§ XXX.05 OPEN DATA REPORT AND POLICY REVIEW(A) Within one year of the effective date of this Ordinance, and thereafter no later than September1 of each year, the Open Data Management Team shall submit to the Mayor and Metro Council anannual Open Data Report.(B) Metro Council may request a specific Department to report on any data or dataset that may bebeneficial or pertinent in implementing policy and legislation.(C) In acknowledgment that technology changes rapidly, in the future, the Open Data Policy shouldshall be reviewed annually and considered for revisions or additions that will continue to positionMetro Government as a leader on issues of

Safety plan

Context

DataSF seeks to transform the way that the City of San Francisco works -- through the use of data.

https://datasf.org/about/

Content

This dataset contains the following tables: ['311_service_requests', 'bikeshare_stations', 'bikeshare_status', 'bikeshare_trips', 'film_locations', 'sffd_service_calls', 'sfpd_incidents', 'street_trees']

• This data includes all San Francisco 311 service requests from July 2008 to the present, and is updated daily. 311 is a non-emergency number that provides access to non-emergency municipal services.
• This data includes fire unit responses to calls from April 2000 to present and is updated daily. Data contains the call number, incident number, address, unit identifier, call type, and disposition. Relevant time intervals are also included. Because this dataset is based on responses, and most calls involved multiple fire units, there are multiple records for each call number. Addresses are associated with a block number, intersection or call box.
• This data includes incidents from the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) Crime Incident Reporting system, from January 2003 until the present (2 weeks ago from current date). The dataset is updated daily. Please note: the SFPD has implemented a new system for tracking crime. This dataset is still sourced from the old system, which is in the process of being retired (a multi-year process).
• This data includes a list of San Francisco Department of Public Works maintained street trees including: planting date, species, and location. Data includes 1955 to present.

This dataset is deprecated and not being updated.

Fork this kernel to get started with this dataset.

Acknowledgements

http://datasf.org/

• https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/public-data/sfo-311
• https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/public-data/sffd-service-calls
• https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/public-data/sfpd-reports
• https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/public-data/sfo-trees

Dataset Source: SF OpenData. This dataset is publicly available for anyone to use under the following terms provided by the Dataset Source - http://sfgov.org/ - and is provided "AS IS" without any warranty, express or implied, from Google. Google disclaims all liability for any damages, direct or indirect, resulting from the use of the dataset.

Banner Photo by @meric from Unplash.

Inspiration

Which neighborhoods have the highest proportion of offensive graffiti?

Which complaint is most likely to be made using Twitter and in which neighborhood?

What are the most complained about Muni stops in San Francisco?

What are the top 10 incident types that the San Francisco Fire Department responds to?

How many medical incidents and structure fires are there in each neighborhood?

What’s the average response time for each type of dispatched vehicle?

Which category of police incidents have historically been the most common in San Francisco?

What were the most common police incidents in the category of LARCENY/THEFT in 2016?

Which non-criminal incidents saw the biggest reporting change from 2015 to 2016?

What is the average tree diameter?

What is the highest number of a particular species of tree planted in a single year?

Which San Francisco locations feature the largest number of trees?

Inmate admissions with attributes (race, gender, legal status, top charge). This data set excludes Sealed Cases. Resulting summaries may differ slightly from other published statistics.

🛡️ Nemotron Content Safety Dataset V1

Nemotron Content Safety Dataset V1, formerly known as Aegis AI Content Safety Dataset, is an open-source content safety dataset (CC-BY-4.0), which adheres to Nvidia's content safety taxonomy, covering 13 critical risk categories (see Dataset Description).

  Dataset Details





  Dataset Description

Nemotron Content Safety Dataset V1 is comprised of approximately 11,000 manually annotated interactions between humans and LLMs, split… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/nvidia/Aegis-AI-Content-Safety-Dataset-1.0.

The Government Open Data Management (ODM) Platform market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing government initiatives promoting transparency, accountability, and citizen engagement. The market's expansion is fueled by the rising need for efficient data management, analysis, and dissemination across various sectors like healthcare, transportation, and public safety. Cloud-based solutions are gaining significant traction due to their scalability, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. The integration of advanced analytics and AI capabilities within ODM platforms is further enhancing their value proposition, enabling governments to derive actionable insights from open data for better policy-making and improved public services. While North America currently holds a significant market share due to early adoption and established technology infrastructure, regions like Asia Pacific are witnessing rapid growth driven by increasing digitalization and government investments in open data initiatives. The market is segmented by application (IT & Cybersecurity, Aerospace & Defense, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals, Energy & Utilities, Logistics & Transportation, and Others) and by type (Cloud-Based and On-Premises). Competition is relatively high, with established players like Socrata and CKAN facing competition from emerging solution providers offering innovative functionalities. However, data security and privacy concerns, along with the complexities of data integration and standardization, pose challenges to market growth. The forecast period (2025-2033) anticipates sustained growth, particularly in developing economies where the potential for utilizing open data for societal improvement is immense. Factors like increasing cybersecurity threats and the need for robust data governance frameworks will shape the market landscape. The increasing adoption of open data standards and interoperability solutions will be crucial for driving wider adoption and maximizing the benefits of government open data initiatives. Specific application segments, such as healthcare and transportation, are poised for significant growth due to the potential for improved public health outcomes and optimized transportation management through data-driven insights. Strategic partnerships between government agencies and technology providers will be critical in accelerating market penetration and ensuring the successful implementation of ODM platforms. A conservative estimation of CAGR (considering a global market size around $2 billion in 2025) suggests an impressive expansion over the forecast period.

Port security

New York City Department of Transportation hosts various safety events throughout New York City at schools, community centers, senior centers and local playground or parks. Types of events includes child passenger safety, bike safety and helmet distribution, public outreach and more to spread safety awareness.

public safety