Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Introduction This dataset contains the terms and definitions included on the UKPN Open Data Portal Glossary Page.
Methodological Approach This dataset is sourced from UK Power Networks internal business glossary.
Quality Control Statement Quality Control Measures include:
Manual review and correction of data inconsistencies Use of additional verification steps to ensure accuracy in the methodology
Assurance Statement The Open Data Team and Data Governance Team worked together to ensure data accuracy and consistency.
Other UKPN Open Data Portal Glossary helps ensure common understanding of terms, used or related to the datasets published on UKPN Open Data Portal. Download dataset information: Metadata (JSON) Definitions of key terms related to this dataset can be found in the Open Data Portal Glossary: https://ukpowernetworks.opendatasoft.com/pages/glossary/
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
glosario is an open-source glossary of terms used in data science that is available online and also as a library in both R and Python. By adding glossary keys to a lesson’s metadata, authors can indicate what the lesson teaches, what learners ought to know before they start, and where they can go to find that knowledge. Authors can also use the library’s functions to insert consistent hyperlinks for terms and definitions in their lessons in any of several languages. The master copy of the glossary lives in the glossary.yml file.
Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
This dataset comprises detailed information about GitHub repositories, issues, and pull requests, collected using the GitHub API. The data includes repository metadata (such as stars, forks, and open issues), along with historical data on issues and pull requests (PRs), including their creation, closure, and merging timelines.
This dataset contains information about GitHub repositories, including metadata such as stars, forks, and activity status.
| Column Name | Data Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
id | object | Unique identifier for the repository. |
name | object | Name of the repository (e.g., "docker"). |
full_name | object | Full name of the repository (e.g., "prometheus/alertmanager"). |
description | object | Description of the repository, may be empty. |
stars | int64 | Number of stars the repository has. |
forks | int64 | Number of times the repository has been forked. |
open_issues | int64 | Number of open issues in the repository. |
created_at | datetime | Date and time when the repository was created. |
updated_at | datetime | Date and time when the repository was last updated. |
size_category | object | Categorization of the repository based on the number of stars (micro, small, medium, large, mega). |
stale | bool | Boolean flag indicating if the repository is "stale" (hasn't been updated in over 6 months). |
stars_per_fork | float64 | Number of stars per fork (calculated). |
stars_per_issue | float64 | Number of stars per open issue (calculated). |
contributor_per_star | float64 | Number of contributors per star (calculated). |
total_contributors | int64 | Total number of contributors from issues and pull requests. |
This dataset contains details of issues raised in the repositories, including information about their creation, closing, and state.
| Column Name | Data Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
id | object | Unique identifier for the issue. |
created_at | datetime | Date and time when the issue was created. |
updated_at | datetime | Date and time when the issue was last updated. |
closed_at | datetime | Date and time when the issue was closed (optional, null if open). |
number | int64 | Issue number in the GitHub repository. |
repository | object | The repository that the issue belongs to (name). |
state | object | Current state of the issue (either "open" or "closed"). |
title | object | Title of the issue. |
resolution_time_days | float64 | Number of days taken to resolve the issue (calculated, -1 for unresolved issues). |
This dataset contains information about pull requests (PRs) in the repositories, including metadata such as their state, creation, closing, and merging time.
| Column Name | Data Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
id | object | Unique identifier for the pull request. |
created_at | datetime | Date and time when the pull request was created. |
updated_at | datetime | Date and time when the pull request was last updated. |
closed_at | datetime | Date and time when the pull request was closed (optional, null if open). |
merged_at | datetime | Date and time when the pull request was merged (optional, null if not merge... |
Facebook
TwitterThe General Offense Crime Report Dataset includes criminal and city code violation offenses which document the scope and nature of each offense or information gathering activity. It is used to computate the Uniform Crime Report Index as reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and for local crime reporting purposes.Contact E-mailLink: N/AData Source: Versaterm Informix RMS \Data Source Type: Informix and/or SQL ServerPreparation Method: Preparation Method: Automated View pulled from SQL Server and published as hosted resource onto ArcGIS OnlinePublish Frequency: WeeklyPublish Method: AutomaticData Dictionary
Facebook
Twitterhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
Background: Critical care units (CCUs) with wide use of various monitoring devices generate massive data. To utilize the valuable information of these devices; data are collected and stored using systems like Clinical Information System (CIS), Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), etc. These systems are proprietary in nature, allow limited access to their database and have vendor specific clinical implementation. In this study we focus on developing an open source web-based meta-data repository for CCU representing stay of patient with relevant details.
Methods: After developing the web-based open source repository we analyzed prospective data from two sites for four months for data quality dimensions (completeness, timeliness, validity, accuracy and consistency), morbidity and clinical outcomes. We used a regression model to highlight the significance of practice variations linked with various quality indicators. Results: Data dictionary (DD) with 1447 fields (90.39% categorical and 9.6% text fields) is presented to cover clinical workflow of NICU. The overall quality of 1795 patient days data with respect to standard quality dimensions is 87%. The data exhibit 82% completeness, 97% accuracy, 91% timeliness and 94% validity in terms of representing CCU processes. The data scores only 67% in terms of consistency. Furthermore, quality indicator and practice variations are strongly correlated (p-value < 0.05).
Results: Data dictionary (DD) with 1555 fields (89.6% categorical and 11.4% text fields) is presented to cover clinical workflow of a CCU. The overall quality of 1795 patient days data with respect to standard quality dimensions is 87%. The data exhibit 82% completeness, 97% accuracy, 91% timeliness and 94% validity in terms of representing CCU processes. The data scores only 67% in terms of consistency. Furthermore, quality indicators and practice variations are strongly correlated (p-value < 0.05).
Conclusion: This study documents DD for standardized data collection in CCU. This provides robust data and insights for audit purposes and pathways for CCU to target practice improvements leading to specific quality improvements.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Database License (ODbL) v1.0https://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Note: This dataset is under active development and the schema is subject to change without notice. This represents the current list of fields available within the open data portal organized by dataset. Fields may be documented within through attached documentation or not at all. Over time we will collect and merge all field definitions to this dataset to simplify access to field documentation. It will be updated on a rolling basis.
This is a dataset hosted by the city of San Francisco. The organization has an open data platform found here and they update their information according the amount of data that is brought in. Explore San Francisco's Data using Kaggle and all of the data sources available through the San Francisco organization page!
This dataset is maintained using Socrata's API and Kaggle's API. Socrata has assisted countless organizations with hosting their open data and has been an integral part of the process of bringing more data to the public.
Cover photo by _HealthyMond on Unsplash
Unsplash Images are distributed under a unique Unsplash License.
Facebook
TwitterA compilation of experimental forage data from 108 unique locations across the United States, with harvest dates ranging from 1958 to 2022. This dataset contains a subset of the data compiled in the initial stages of development of the Forage Data Hub. In particular, these are the 37,970 data entries used for the forage system resiliency analysis presented in the primary article. Resources in this dataset: Resource Title: FDH Data Dictionary File Name: FDH_Data_Dictionary.csv Resource Description: Data dictionary for the data compiled as a result of the efforts described in Ashworth et al. (2023) - Framework to Develop an Open-Source Forage Data Network to Improve Primary Productivity and Enhance System Resiliency (in review). Includes descriptions for the data fields in the FDH Data data file. Resource Title: FDH Data File Name: FDH_Data_03-04-2023.csv Resource Description: Data compiled as a result of the efforts described in Ashworth et al. (2023) - Framework to Develop an Open-Source Forage Data Network to Improve Primary Productivity and Enhance System Resiliency (in review). Includes a lightly preprocessed version of the data housed in the Forage Data Hub as of March 4th, 2023.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Description: All sites shown within the “PRA State Assets” layer are folios sourced from searching the PRAI database and are accurate from the date of that PRAI search. The registered owner field may have been changed to keep consistency throughout the database.The folio boundary data available on this site is derived from source data provided by the Property Registration Authority (PRA) and is subject to PRA copyright. The currency and accuracy of this data at the time of inspection cannot be guaranteed. Those wishing to ensure that folio boundary data is the most accurate and up to date available should access this information through landdirect.ie.The information shown within the “PRA State Assets” layer depicts sites we believe to be within the ownership of the state however at the time of compiling this layer they were not registered with the PRAI. Please note the State Assets Sourced by the LDA sites have been manually sourced and drawn by the LDA and will be updated regularly.Please contact assetdatabase@lda.ie if we have shown any incorrect information or if we are missing State-owned assets within these layers.Access and Constraints: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Facebook
TwitterThe National Bridge Inventory Elements dataset is as of June 20, 2025 from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The data describes more than 620,000 of the Nation's bridges located on public roads, including Interstate Highways, U.S. highways, State and county roads, as well as publicly-accessible bridges on Federal and Tribal lands. The element data present a breakdown of the condition of each structural and bridge management element for each bridge on the National Highway System (NHS). The Specification for the National Bridge Inventory Bridge Elements contains a detailed description of each data element including coding instructions and attribute definitions. The Coding Guide is available at: https://doi.org/10.21949/1519106. A data dictionary, or other source of attribute information, is accessible at https://doi.org/10.21949/1519106
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataverse.csuc.cat/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.0/customlicense?persistentId=doi:10.34810/data277https://dataverse.csuc.cat/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.0/customlicense?persistentId=doi:10.34810/data277
This is the LMF version of the Basque Apertium dictionary. Monolingual dictionaries for Spanish, Catalan, Gallego and Euskera have been generated from the Apertium expanded lexicons of the es-ca (for both Spanish andCatalan) es-gl (for Galician) and eu-es (for Basque). Apertium is a free/open-source machine translation platform, initially aimed at related-language pairs but recently expanded to deal with more divergent language pairs (such as English-Catalan). The platform provides: a language-independent machine translation engine; tools to manage the linguistic data necessary to build a machine translation system for a given language pair and linguistic data for a growing number of language pairs.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataverse.csuc.cat/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.0/customlicense?persistentId=doi:10.34810/data317https://dataverse.csuc.cat/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.0/customlicense?persistentId=doi:10.34810/data317
This is the LMF version of the Apertium bilingual dictionary for Esperanto and English languages. Bilingual LMF dictionaries were generated from Apertium bilingual dix files. For each Apertium bilingual correspondence, the corresponding source and target monolingual entries (LexicalEntry) were generated in addition to the bilingual correspondence (SenseAxis) element. Apertium is a free/open-source machine translation platform, initially aimed at related-language pairs but recently expanded to deal with more divergent language pairs (such as Esperanto-English). The platform provides: a language-independent machine translation engine; tools to manage the linguistic data necessary to build a machine translation system for a given language pair and linguistic data for a growing number of language pairs.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
IntroductionFollowing the identification of Local Area Energy Planning (LAEP) use cases, this dataset lists the data sources and/or information that could help facilitate this research. View our dedicated page to find out how we derived this list: Local Area Energy Plan — UK Power Networks (opendatasoft.com)
Methodological Approach Data upload: a list of datasets and ancillary details are uploaded into a static Excel file before uploaded onto the Open Data Portal.
Quality Control Statement
Quality Control Measures include: Manual review and correct of data inconsistencies Use of additional verification steps to ensure accuracy in the methodology
Assurance Statement The Open Data Team and Local Net Zero Team worked together to ensure data accuracy and consistency.
Other Download dataset information: Metadata (JSON)
Definitions of key terms related to this dataset can be found in the Open Data Portal Glossary: https://ukpowernetworks.opendatasoft.com/pages/glossary/
Please note that "number of records" in the top left corner is higher than the number of datasets available as many datasets are indexed against multiple use cases leading to them being counted as multiple records.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Introduction
This dataset shows the half-hourly load profiles of identified data centres within UK Power Networks' licence areas.
The loads have been determined using actual demand data from connected sites within UK Power Networks' licence areas, from 1 January 2023 onwards.
Loads are expressed proportionally, by comparing the half-hourly observed import power seen across the site's meter point(s), against the meter's maximum import capacity. Units for both measures are apparent power, in kilovolt amperes (kVA).
To protect the identity of the sites, data points have been anonymised and only the site's voltage level information - and our estimation of the data centre type - has been provided.
Methodological Approach
Over 100 operational data centre sites (and at least 10 per voltage level) were identified through internal desktop exercises and corroboration with external sources.
After identifying these sites, their addresses, connection point, and MPAN(s) (Meter Point Administration Number(s)) were identified using internal systems.
Half-hourly smart meter import data were retrieved using internal systems. This included both half-hourly meter data, and static data (such as the MPAN's maximum import capacity and voltage group, the latter through the MPAN's Line Loss Factor Class Description). Half-hourly meter import data came in the form of active and reactive power, and the apparent power was calculated using the power triangle.
In cases where there are numerous meter points for a given data centre site, the observed import powers across all relevant meter points were summed, and compared against the sum total of maximum import capacity for the meters.
The percentage utilisation for each half-hour for each data centre was determined via the following equation:
% Utilisation_data centre site =
SUM( S_MPAN half-hourly observed import)
SUM( S_MPAN Maximum Import Capacity)
Where S = Apparent Power in kilovolt amperes (kVA)
To ensure the dataset includes only operational data centres, the dataset was then cleansed to exclude sites where utilisation was consistently at 0% across the year.
Based on the MPAN's address and corroboration with other open data sources, a data centre type was derived: either enterprise (i.e. company-owned and operated), or co-located (i.e. one company owns the data centre, but other customers operate IT load in the premises as tenants).
Each data centre site was then anonymised by removing any identifiers other than voltage level and UK Power Networks' view of the data centre type.
Quality Control Statement
The dataset is primarily built upon customer smart meter data for connected customer sites within the UK Power Networks' licence areas.
The smart meter data that is used is sourced from external providers. While UK Power Networks does not control the quality of this data directly, these data have been incorporated into our models with careful validation and alignment.
Any missing or bad data has been addressed though robust data cleaning methods, such as omission.
Assurance Statement
The dataset is generated through a manual process, conducted by the Distribution System Operator's Regional Development Team.
The dataset will be reviewed quarterly - both in terms of the operational data centre sites identified, their maximum observed demands and their maximum import capacities - to assess any changes and determine if updates of demand specific profiles are necessary.
Deriving the data centre type is a desktop-based process based on the MPAN's address and through corroboration with external, online sources.
This process ensures that the dataset remains relevant and reflective of real-world data centre usage over time.
There are sufficient data centre sites per voltage level to assure anonymity of data centre sites.
Other Definitions of key terms related to this dataset can be found in the Open Data Portal Glossary: https://ukpowernetworks.opendatasoft.com/pages/glossary/Download dataset information: Metadata (JSON)To view this data please register and login.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://catalogue.elra.info/static/from_media/metashare/licences/ELRA_END_USER.pdfhttps://catalogue.elra.info/static/from_media/metashare/licences/ELRA_END_USER.pdf
https://catalogue.elra.info/static/from_media/metashare/licences/ELRA_VAR.pdfhttps://catalogue.elra.info/static/from_media/metashare/licences/ELRA_VAR.pdf
The Arabic dictionary of inflected words consists of a list of 6 million inflected forms, fully vowelized, generated in compliance with the grammatical rules of Arabic and tagged with grammatical information which includes POS and grammatical features, including number, gender, case, definiteness, tense, mood and compatibility with clitic agglutination.The data is formatted in conformity with the data formats of Unitex/GramLab, an open source corpus processing system for language processing. These data formats are publicly documented. The data can either be converted into user-specific formats, or be used directly with Unitex/GramLab. This dictionary is also available together with recognition of agglutinated clitics and inflection system in the ELRA Catalogue under reference ELRA-L0099.Authors: Alexis NEME et Eric LAPORTE
Facebook
Twitterhttps://catalog.elda.org/static/from_media/metashare/licences/ELRA_VAR.pdfhttps://catalog.elda.org/static/from_media/metashare/licences/ELRA_VAR.pdf
This dictionary consists of 6 million inflected forms, fully vowelized, generated in compliance with the grammatical rules of Arabic and tagged with grammatical information which includes POS and grammatical features, including number, gender, case, definiteness, tense, mood and compatibility with clitic agglutination.It is accompanied by a grammatical resource that recognizes hundreds of millions of valid agglutinated words, i.e. words consisting of one of the forms in the dictionary preceded and/or followed by clitics (conjunctions, prepositions, articles, pronouns) in compliance with the grammatical rules of Arabic.In order to be able to update the full-form dictionary, a dictionary of 65 000 lemmas and the data required to inflect them and regenerate the full-form dictionary are also provided. This allows adapting the dictionary to specific applications by deleting and/or adding entries. The resource as it stands covers more than 98% of the forms found in any sort of literature, newspaper articles...; the remaining 2% include proper names, which can be relevant.The data is formatted in conformity with the data formats of Unitex/GramLab, an open source corpus processing system for language processing. These data formats are publicly documented. The data can either be converted into user-specific formats, or be used directly with Unitex/GramLab.This dictionary is also available without recognition of agglutinated clitics and without inflection system in the ELRA Catalogue under reference ELRA-L0098.Authors: Alexis NEME et Eric LAPORTE
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Introduction This dataset shows an anonymised list of live, committed, import-related projects within UK Power Networks' licence areas. This includes demand-only projects that are 5,000 kilovolt-amperes (kVA) and above, as well as battery energy storage systems (BESS).
This list has been determined using internal systems UK Power Networks uses to manage all committed projects in the process of connecting to our network. To protect the identity of the sites, entries have been anonymised and only the licence area, the grid supply point the project is connecting at (or under), rounded requested import capacity, and application date have been provided.
Methodological Approach Live, committed demand projects are identified through desktop exercises using UK Power Networks' internal customer relationship management system and extracted.
The projects are then filtered to only show projects where The required import capacity is more than or equal to 5,000kVAThe required export capacity is 0MVA.
These project entries are then cross-referenced with other sources to verify its status. Any discrepancies are manually reviewed and kept/omitted as appropriate.To protect the identity of the demand projects the required import capacity is rounded, and the project names are anonymised by providing an arbitrary sequential number.
Quality Control Statement The dataset is primarily built upon internal data, relating to live demand projects in UK Power Networks' licence areas. Information about battery energy storage systems are taken from existing datasets relating to Appendix G information UK Power Networks manages.Data have been checked with both automatic and manual validation methods.
Assurance Statement The dataset is generated through a manual process, conducted by the Distribution System Operator's Regional Development Team. The dataset will be reviewed monthly to assess any changes, and to determine if any updates to the methodology are necessary. This process ensures that the dataset remains relevant and reflective of the live large demand projects UK Power Networks is working on. There are sufficient projects per licence area to assure anonymity of projects.While all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided in this dataset, neither the licensee nor any of its directors or employees is under any liability for any errors, or for any misstatement on which a user of the data seeks to rely. Please view our Terms and Conditions for more information.The data provided constitutes UK Power Networks’ provisional view of the status at this GSP at the date of publication and is for general information only.
Other Download dataset information: Metadata (JSON)
Definitions of key terms related to this dataset can be found in the Open Data Portal Glossary: https://ukpowernetworks.opendatasoft.com/pages/glossary/For prospective customers considering a connection to our network, we provide pre-application support on our website to make the connection journey as smooth as possible: Pre-application support and advice | UK Power NetworksWe also offer an "Ask the Expert" service, designed for some of your more complex connection questions that go beyond our FAQs. You can request an "Ask the Expert" surgery session, where our specialists can provide more specific technical guidance: Ask the Expert | UK Power NetworksTo view this data please register and login.
Facebook
TwitterExample: pandas.read_csv(path_to_file,encoding = 'ISO-8859-1')
- This dataset is extracted from Canada Government Website
- Published by: Canada Border Services Agency
- License: Open Government Licence - Canada
Travel Date: The date when travellers came through Canada
Traveller: A person who is traveling or who often travels
Volumes: An amount or quantity of travellers entering Canada
Year: The period of time according to calendar year the traveller came into Canada
Month: The month the travellers came into Canada
Port of Entry: The location in which the traveller is entering Canada
Mode: The type of way or manner in which travellers used to enter Canada
Air: Travellers entering Canada via airplane/ Voyageurs entrant le Canada par avion
Marine: Relating to any vessel and traveller entering Canada via water including ship, boat or craft being used for marine navigation
Rail: Travellers entering Canada via a train or railroad
Land: Travellers entering Canada via land rather than in water or air
Border: A line separating two political or geographical areas
Data: Facts and statistics collected together for reference or analysis on travellers
Highway: A main road connecting to major towns or cities the traveller used to enter Canada
Immigration: The action of travellers coming to live permanently in a foreign country
Large Port of entry: A considerable or relatively great size port of entryimportante
Small port of entry: A size that is less than normal or usual port of entry
Region: An area or division especially part of a country that the travellers are entering Canada
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Introduction
5 December 2024: The National Chargepoint Registry (NCR) was decommissioned on 28 November 2024 by the Department of Transport. All public EV chargepoint operators are now required to share open data free of charge on elements such as location, real-time availability, connector types, and payment methods. The archived NCR data will be available on request to users and researchers. For any enquiries contact consumerofferconsult@ozev.gov.uk.
Methodological Approach This dataset was provided by the Office for Zero Emission Vehicles.
Quality Control Statement The data is provided "as is".
Assurance Statement The Open Data team has checked the code for the API pull against source to ensure data accuracy and consistency.
For more information, please visit their website: Department for Transport
The National Chargepoint Register (NCR) is a database of publicly available chargepoints for electric vehicles in the UK established in 2011. The underlying dataset from the Office of Zero Emission Vehicles (OZEV) is continually updated by chargepoint networks, owners and controllers.Note, we have restricted the coverage to overlap with UK Power Networks three licence areas of Eastern Power Networks, London Power Networks and South Eastern Power Networks.Other
Download dataset information: Metadata (JSON)
Definitions of key terms related to this dataset can be found in the Open Data Portal Glossary: https://ukpowernetworks.opendatasoft.com/pages/glossary/
Facebook
TwitterThese are economic models in Make and Use formats with variations of one and two-region versions where the one region is just a U.S. state of interest (SoI) and the two-region version include both the SoI and Rest of the U.S. (RoUS). Inudstry and Commodity output vectors are also provided. Models are available representing annual totals for each year for each state from 2012 to 2017. Variations for "Domestic" forms of models are available. See the associated publication, also available without fees in PubMed, for details. These models were created with stateior v0.1.0 (https://github.com/USEPA/stateior/releases/tag/0.1.0). and can be used in that R software. See https://github.com/USEPA/stateior/tree/0.1.0 for usage details. The provided data link reveals many R Data Format (.RDS) files that can be read into R, along with metadata files in JSON format that provide information on provenance of the data. File names corresponded with the definitions in the associated data dictionary (for two-region files) and the associated supporting link (for one-region files). Other files are precursors to the one and two-region models with data that are used in the model building process and can be read into R. All model files corresponding to the associated publication have the the text "0.1.0" in the filename, for example "Census_StateExport_2013_0.1.0.rds". Each file contains all states for the year in the file name with a year is included. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Li, M., J. Ferreira, C.D. Court, D. Meyer, M. Li, and W.W. Ingwersen. StateIO - Open Source Economic Input-Output Models for the 50 States of the United States of America. International Regional Science Review. SAGE Publications, THOUSAND OAKS, CA, USA, 46(4): 428-481, (2023).
Facebook
TwitterThis report summarizes the 2018 NSDUH methods and other supporting information relevant to estimates of substance use and mental health issues, and organized into five chapters. Chapter 1 is an introduction to the report. Chapter 2 describes the survey, including information about the sample design; data collection procedures; and key aspects of data processing, such as development of analysis weights. Chapter 3 presents technical details on the statistical methods and measurement, such as suppression criteria for unreliable estimates, statistical testing procedures, and issues for selected substance use and mental health measures. Chapter 4 covers special topics related to prescription psychotherapeutic drugs. Chapter 5 describes other sources of data on substance use and mental health issues, including data sources for populations outside the NSDUH target population. Appendix A is a glossary that covers key definitions for use as a resource with the 2018 NSDUH reports and detailed tables. Appendix B provides a list of contributors to the report.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Introduction This dataset contains the terms and definitions included on the UKPN Open Data Portal Glossary Page.
Methodological Approach This dataset is sourced from UK Power Networks internal business glossary.
Quality Control Statement Quality Control Measures include:
Manual review and correction of data inconsistencies Use of additional verification steps to ensure accuracy in the methodology
Assurance Statement The Open Data Team and Data Governance Team worked together to ensure data accuracy and consistency.
Other UKPN Open Data Portal Glossary helps ensure common understanding of terms, used or related to the datasets published on UKPN Open Data Portal. Download dataset information: Metadata (JSON) Definitions of key terms related to this dataset can be found in the Open Data Portal Glossary: https://ukpowernetworks.opendatasoft.com/pages/glossary/