Geographic Information System (GIS) analyses are an essential part of natural resource management and research. Calculating and summarizing data within intersecting GIS layers is common practice for analysts and researchers. However, the various tools and steps required to complete this process are slow and tedious, requiring many tools iterating over hundreds, or even thousands of datasets. USGS scientists will combine a series of ArcGIS geoprocessing capabilities with custom scripts to create tools that will calculate, summarize, and organize large amounts of data that can span many temporal and spatial scales with minimal user input. The tools work with polygons, lines, points, and rasters to calculate relevant summary data and combine them into a single output table that can be easily incorporated into statistical analyses. These tools are useful for anyone interested in using an automated script to quickly compile summary information within all areas of interest in a GIS dataset

The Counties clipped layer was created using ArcGIS's Clip (Analysis) Tool to extract the DRCOG County Boundaries that overlay the MHFD District Boundary.

Lesson 1. An Introduction to working with multispectral satellite data in ArcGIS Pro In which we learn: • How to unpack tar and gz files from USGS EROS • The basic map interface in ArcGIS • How to add image files • What each individual band of Landsat spectral data looks like • The difference between: o Analysis-ready data: surface reflectance and surface temperature o Landsat Collection 1 Level 3 data: burned area and dynamic surface water o Sentinel2data o ISRO AWiFS and LISS-3 data Lesson 2. Basic image preprocessing In which we learn: • How to composite using the composite band tool • How to represent composite images • All about band combinations • How to composite using raster functions • How to subset data into a rectangle • How to clip to a polygon Lesson 3. Working with mosaic datasets In which we learn: o How to prepare an empty mosaic dataset o How to add images to a mosaic dataset o How to change symbology in a mosaic dataset o How to add a time attribute o How to add a time dimension to the mosaic dataset o How to view time series data in a mosaic dataset Lesson 4. Working with and creating derived datasets In which we learn: • How to visualize Landsat ARD surface temperature • How to calculate F° from K° using ARD surface temperature • How to generate and apply .lyrx files • How to calculate an NDVI raster using ISRO LISS-3 data • How to visualize burned areas using Landsat Level 3 data • How to visualize dynamic surface water extent using Landsat Level 3 data

Local land ownership for Southeast Alaska is shown. The data includes agency, administration group and the unit. File generated from running the Extract Data solution.

Publication Date: May 2025.

U.S. Counties represents the counties of the United States in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.

This dataset is available for download from: Wetlands (File Geodatabase).

Wetlands in California are protected by several federal and state laws, regulations, and policies. This layer was extracted from the broader land cover raster from the CA Nature project which was recently enhanced to include a more comprehensive definition of wetland. This wetlands dataset is used as an exclusion as part of the biological planning priorities in the CEC 2023 Land-Use Screens.

This layer is featured in the CEC 2023 Land-Use Screens for Electric System Planning data viewer.

For more information about this layer and its use in electric system planning, please refer to the Land Use Screens Staff Report in the CEC Energy Planning Library.

Change Log

Version 1.1 (January 26, 2023)

• Full resolution of wetlands replaced a coarser resolution version that was previously shared. Also, file type changed from polygon to raster (feature service to tile layer service).

Polygon layer

Notice: this is not the latest Heat Island Severity image service.This layer contains the relative heat severity for every pixel for every city in the United States, including Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico. Heat Severity is a reclassified version of Heat Anomalies raster which is also published on this site. This data is generated from 30-meter Landsat 8 imagery band 10 (ground-level thermal sensor) from the summer of 2023.To explore previous versions of the data, visit the links below:Heat Severity - USA 2022Heat Severity - USA 2021Heat Severity - USA 2020Heat Severity - USA 2019Federal statistics over a 30-year period show extreme heat is the leading cause of weather-related deaths in the United States. Extreme heat exacerbated by urban heat islands can lead to increased respiratory difficulties, heat exhaustion, and heat stroke. These heat impacts significantly affect the most vulnerable—children, the elderly, and those with preexisting conditions.The purpose of this layer is to show where certain areas of cities are hotter than the average temperature for that same city as a whole. Severity is measured on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being a relatively mild heat area (slightly above the mean for the city), and 5 being a severe heat area (significantly above the mean for the city). The absolute heat above mean values are classified into these 5 classes using the Jenks Natural Breaks classification method, which seeks to reduce the variance within classes and maximize the variance between classes. Knowing where areas of high heat are located can help a city government plan for mitigation strategies.This dataset represents a snapshot in time. It will be updated yearly, but is static between updates. It does not take into account changes in heat during a single day, for example, from building shadows moving. The thermal readings detected by the Landsat 8 sensor are surface-level, whether that surface is the ground or the top of a building. Although there is strong correlation between surface temperature and air temperature, they are not the same. We believe that this is useful at the national level, and for cities that don’t have the ability to conduct their own hyper local temperature survey. Where local data is available, it may be more accurate than this dataset. Dataset SummaryThis dataset was developed using proprietary Python code developed at Trust for Public Land, running on the Descartes Labs platform through the Descartes Labs API for Python. The Descartes Labs platform allows for extremely fast retrieval and processing of imagery, which makes it possible to produce heat island data for all cities in the United States in a relatively short amount of time.What can you do with this layer?This layer has query, identify, and export image services available. Since it is served as an image service, it is not necessary to download the data; the service itself is data that can be used directly in any Esri geoprocessing tool that accepts raster data as input.In order to click on the image service and see the raw pixel values in a map viewer, you must be signed in to ArcGIS Online, then Enable Pop-Ups and Configure Pop-Ups.Using the Urban Heat Island (UHI) Image ServicesThe data is made available as an image service. There is a processing template applied that supplies the yellow-to-red or blue-to-red color ramp, but once this processing template is removed (you can do this in ArcGIS Pro or ArcGIS Desktop, or in QGIS), the actual data values come through the service and can be used directly in a geoprocessing tool (for example, to extract an area of interest). Following are instructions for doing this in Pro.In ArcGIS Pro, in a Map view, in the Catalog window, click on Portal. In the Portal window, click on the far-right icon representing Living Atlas. Search on the acronyms “tpl” and “uhi”. The results returned will be the UHI image services. Right click on a result and select “Add to current map” from the context menu. When the image service is added to the map, right-click on it in the map view, and select Properties. In the Properties window, select Processing Templates. On the drop-down menu at the top of the window, the default Processing Template is either a yellow-to-red ramp or a blue-to-red ramp. Click the drop-down, and select “None”, then “OK”. Now you will have the actual pixel values displayed in the map, and available to any geoprocessing tool that takes a raster as input. Below is a screenshot of ArcGIS Pro with a UHI image service loaded, color ramp removed, and symbology changed back to a yellow-to-red ramp (a classified renderer can also be used): A typical operation at this point is to clip out your area of interest. To do this, add your polygon shapefile or feature class to the map view, and use the Clip Raster tool to export your area of interest as a geoTIFF raster (file extension ".tif"). In the environments tab for the Clip Raster tool, click the dropdown for "Extent" and select "Same as Layer:", and select the name of your polygon. If you then need to convert the output raster to a polygon shapefile or feature class, run the Raster to Polygon tool, and select "Value" as the field.Other Sources of Heat Island InformationPlease see these websites for valuable information on heat islands and to learn about exciting new heat island research being led by scientists across the country:EPA’s Heat Island Resource CenterDr. Ladd Keith, University of ArizonaDr. Ben McMahan, University of Arizona Dr. Jeremy Hoffman, Science Museum of Virginia Dr. Hunter Jones, NOAA Daphne Lundi, Senior Policy Advisor, NYC Mayor's Office of Recovery and ResiliencyDisclaimer/FeedbackWith nearly 14,000 cities represented, checking each city's heat island raster for quality assurance would be prohibitively time-consuming, so Trust for Public Land checked a statistically significant sample size for data quality. The sample passed all quality checks, with about 98.5% of the output cities error-free, but there could be instances where the user finds errors in the data. These errors will most likely take the form of a line of discontinuity where there is no city boundary; this type of error is caused by large temperature differences in two adjacent Landsat scenes, so the discontinuity occurs along scene boundaries (see figure below). Trust for Public Land would appreciate feedback on these errors so that version 2 of the national UHI dataset can be improved. Contact Dale.Watt@tpl.org with feedback.

We were required to Georeference topographical maps which had been shared. I digitised a polygon shapefile within the mosaicked image. I used the polygon to clip the raster dataset in which I digitised line, polygon and point features within the clipped raster. The final product was a map of Meru which is shown. We added Kenya counties layer, Kenya schools layer, Kenya health layer and Kenya streets layer to Arcmap. I then clipped my respective county which is Laikipia County,in Kenya. I then clipped the added layers to fit my county so that I could process the required data. I buffered health layer so that it could help me know which schools were within 120 m from the health facilities. Also, i buffered steets to 55m from the schools to know which were closest and their accessibility. This data was to be used by the Ministry of Health to plan for polio vaccination in the county. The finished product was a map as shown below.

The Grid Garage Toolbox is designed to help you undertake the Geographic Information System (GIS) tasks required to process GIS data (geodata) into a standard, spatially aligned format. This format is required by most, grid or raster, spatial modelling tools such as the Multi-criteria Analysis Shell for Spatial Decision Support (MCAS-S). Grid Garage contains 36 tools designed to save you time by batch processing repetitive GIS tasks as well diagnosing problems with data and capturing a record of processing step and any errors encountered. Grid Garage provides tools that function using a list based approach to batch processing where both inputs and outputs are specified in tables to enable selective batch processing and detailed result reporting. In many cases the tools simply extend the functionality of standard ArcGIS tools, providing some or all of the inputs required by these tools via the input table to enable batch processing on a 'per item' basis. This approach differs slightly from normal batch processing in ArcGIS, instead of manually selecting single items or a folder on which to apply a tool or model you provide a table listing target datasets. In summary the Grid Garage allows you to: * List, describe and manage very large volumes of geodata. * Batch process repetitive GIS tasks such as managing (renaming, describing etc.) or processing (clipping, resampling, reprojecting etc.) many geodata inputs such as time-series geodata derived from satellite imagery or climate models. * Record any errors when batch processing and diagnose errors by interrogating the input geodata that failed. * Develop your own models in ArcGIS ModelBuilder that allow you to automate any GIS workflow utilising one or more of the Grid Garage tools that can process an unlimited number of inputs. * Automate the process of generating MCAS-S TIP metadata files for any number of input raster datasets. The Grid Garage is intended for use by anyone with an understanding of GIS principles and an intermediate to advanced level of GIS skills. Using the Grid Garage tools in ArcGIS ModelBuilder requires skills in the use of the ArcGIS ModelBuilder tool. Download Instructions: Create a new folder on your computer or network and then download and unzip the zip file from the GitHub Release page for each of the following items in the 'Data and Resources' section below. There is a folder in each zip file that contains all the files. See the Grid Garage User Guide for instructions on how to install and use the Grid Garage Toolbox with the sample data provided.

Tree canopy was derived from high-resolution remotely sensed data -- 2018 NAIP and 2019 LiDAR. Object-based image analysis techniques (OBIA) were employed to extract potential tree canopy and trees using the best available remotely sensed and vector GIS datasets. OBIA systems work by grouping pixels into meaningful objects based on their spectral and spatial properties, while taking into account boundaries imposed by existing vector datasets. Within the OBIA environment a rule-based expert system was designed to effectively mimic the process of manual image analysis by incorporating the elements of image interpretation (color/tone, texture, pattern, location, size, and shape) into the classification process. A series of morphological procedures were employed to insure that the end product is both accurate and cartographically pleasing. Following the automated OBIA mapping a detailed manual review of the dataset was carried out at a scale of 1:2000 and all observable errors were corrected.

These points represent private schools as approved through the Washington State Board of Education. For more information please visit the SBE website.

Displays data from CARTO.PRIV_SCH. Labels based on the attribute NAME. Data is downloaded from website as an .xlsx, then queried for City = Seattle, then geocoded.

Updated as needed, last update August 2024.

Complete accounting of all incorporated cities, including the boundary and name of each individual city. From 2009 to 2022 CAL FIRE maintained this dataset by processing and digitally capturing annexations sent by the state Board of Equalization (BOE). In 2022 CAL FIRE began sourcing data directly from BOE, in order to allow the authoritative department provide data directly. This data is then adjusted so it resembles the previous formats.Processing includes:• Clipping the dataset to traditional state boundaries• Erasing areas that span the Bay Area (derived from calw221.gdb)• Querying for incorporated areas only• Dissolving each incorporated polygon into a single feature• Calculating the COUNTY field to remove the word 'County'Version 24_1 is based on BOE_CityCounty_20240315, and includes all annexations present in BOE_CityAnx2023_20240315. Note: The Board of Equalization represents incorporated city boundaries as extending significantly into waterways, including beyond coastal boundaries. To see the representation in its original form please reference the datasets listed above.Note: The Board of Equalization represents incorporated city boundaries is extending significantly into waterways, including beyond coastal boundaries. To see the representation in its original form please reference the datasets listed above.

Distribution map of Crataegus monogyna.These maps were produced by combining numerous and heterogeneous data collected from atlas monographs providing complete species distribution maps, from national to regional atlases, occurrence geo-databases, scientific and grey literature. The maps were created using ESRI shapefiles (*.shp, *.shx, *.dbf, *.prj files) archived in the ZIP file. Species range is mapped with polygon features (name suffix "plg"), which define continuous areas of occupancy of the species, and with point features (name suffix "pnt"), which identify more fragmented and isolated populations. If synanthropic occurrences are reported outside the species natural range, additional point and/or polygon shapefiles are also present (suffix "syn"). Polygon borders delimiting species ranges are generalized across the mainland and sea boundaries. This offers the possibility to mask sea areas or to clip and extract the terrestrial range parts using GIS data layers of the users' choice. An additional version of polygon ranges are clipped with a coastline (name suffix "clip"), which have been derived from Natural Earth dataset "Admin 0 - Countries" 1:50M version 4.1.0 (https://www.naturalearthdata.com).Please cite as: Caudullo, G., Welk, E., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., 2017. Chorological maps for the main European woody species. Data in Brief 12, 662-666. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.007Additional information and used references are on 'supplementary materials' document: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5091901Chorological maps are part of the "European Atlas of Forest Tree Species" project: https://w3id.org/mtv/FISE-Comm/v01

Distribution map of Atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica)These maps were produced by combining numerous and heterogeneous data collected from atlas monographs providing complete species distribution maps, from national to regional atlases, occurrence geo-databases, scientific and grey literature.The maps were created using ESRI shapefiles (*.shp, *.shx, *.dbf, *.prj files) archived in the ZIP file. Species range is mapped with polygon features (name suffix "plg"), which define continuous areas of occupancy of the species, and with point features (name suffix "pnt"), which identify more fragmented and isolated populations. If synanthropic occurrences are reported outside the species natural range, additional point and/or polygon shapefiles are also present (suffix "syn").Polygon borders delimiting species ranges are generalized across the mainland and sea boundaries. This offers the possibility to mask sea areas or to clip and extract the terrestrial range parts using GIS data layers of the users' choice. An additional version of polygon ranges are clipped with a coastline (name suffix "clip"), which have been derived from Natural Earth dataset "Admin 0 - Countries" 1:50M version 4.1.0 (https://www.naturalearthdata.com)Please cite as:Caudullo, G., Welk, E., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., 2017. Chorological maps for the main European woody species. Data in Brief 12, 662-666. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.007Additional information and used references are on 'supplementary materials' document:https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5091901Chorological maps are part of the "European Atlas of Forest Tree Species" project:https://w3id.org/mtv/FISE-Comm/v01

A Groundwater Body (GWB) under the Water Framework Directive (WFD) Art. 2 is defined as a distinct volume of groundwater within an aquifer or aquifers, whereas an aquifer is defined as a geological layer with significant groundwater flow. This definition of a GWB allows a wide scope of interpretations. EU Member States (MS) are under obligation to report the GWBs including the results of the GWB survey periodically according to the schedule of the WFD. Reportnet is used for the submission of GWB data to the EEA by MS and includes spatial data as GIS polygons and GWB characteristics in an XML schema.

The WISE provisional reference GIS WFD Dataset on GWBs combines spatial data consisting of several shape files and certain GWB attributes in a single table submitted by the MS according to Art. 13. The GWBs are divided into horizons, which represent distinct vertical layers of groundwater resources. All GWBs assigned to a certain horizon from one to five are merged into one shape file. GWBs assigned to horizons six or seven are combined in a single further shape file. Another two shape files comprise the GWBs of Reunion Island in the southern hemisphere and the GWBs from Switzerland as a non EU MS, all of which assigned to horizon 1.

The dbf tables of the shape files include the columns “EU_CD_GW” as the GWB identifier and “Horizon” describing the vertical positioning. The polygon identifier “Polygon_ID” was added subsequently, because some GWBs consist of several polygons with identical “EU_CD_GW”even in the same horizon. Some further GWB characteristics are provided with the Microsoft Excel file “GWB_attributes_2012June.xls” including the column “EU_CD_GW”, which serves as a key for joining spatial and attribute data. There is no corresponding spatial data for GWBs in the Microsoft Excel table without an entry in column “EU_CD_GW”. The spatial resolution is given for about a half of the GWBs in the column “Scale” of the xls file, which is varying between the MS from 1 : 10,000 to 1 : 1,000,000 and mostly in the range from 1 : 50,000 to 1 : 250,000. The processing of some of the GWB shape files by GIS routines as clip or intersect in combination with a test polygon resulted in errors. Therefore a correction of erroneous topological features causing routine failures was carried out. However, the GWB layer includes a multitude of in parts very tiny, distinct areas resulting in a highly detailed or fragmented pattern. In certain parts topological inconsistencies appear quite frequently and delineation methodologies are currently varying between the MS in terms of size and three dimensional positioning of GWBs. This version of the dataset has to be considered as a first step towards a consistent GWB picture throughout Europe, but it is not yet of a sufficient quality to support spatial analyses i.e. it is not a fully developed reference GIS dataset. Therefore, the layer is published as a preliminary version and use of this data is subject to certain restrictions outlined in the explanatory notes.

It should be underlined that the methodology used is still under discussion (Working Group C -Groundwater) and is not fully harmonised throughout the EU MS.

For the external publication the whole United Kingdom had to be removed due to licensing restrictions.