Facebook
TwitterThis data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. This theme contains PLS lines for the State of Oregon. This PLS theme includes donation claims lands. Attributes in this theme show Township Range and Section values.
Facebook
TwitterThis Zoning feature class is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework statewide, Zoning spatial data. This version is authorized for public use. Attributes include zoning districts that have been generalized to state classes. As of June 30, 2023, this feature class contains zoning data from 229 local jurisdictions. DLCD plans to continue adding to and updating this statewide zoning dataset as they receive zoning information from the local jurisdictions. Jurisdictions included in the latest version of the statewide zoning geodatabase: Cities: Adams, Adrian, Albany, Amity, Antelope, Ashland, Astoria, Athena, Aurora, Banks, Barlow, Bay City, Beaverton, Bend, Boardman, Bonanza, Brookings, Brownsville, Burns, Butte Falls, Canby, Cannon Beach, Carlton, Cascade Locks, Cave Junction, Central Point, Chiloquin, Coburg, Columbia City, Coos Bay, Cornelius, Corvallis, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Culver, Dayton, Detroit, Donald, Drain, Dufur, Dundee, Dunes City, Durham, Eagle Point, Echo, Enterprise, Estacada, Eugene, Fairview, Falls City, Florence, Forest Grove, Fossil, Garibaldi, Gaston, Gates, Gearhart, Gervais, Gladstone, Gold Beach, Gold Hill, Grants Pass, Grass Valley, Gresham, Halsey, Happy Valley, Harrisburg, Helix, Hermiston, Hillsboro, Hines, Hood River, Hubbard, Idanha, Independence, Jacksonville, Jefferson, Johnson City, Jordan Valley, Junction City, Keizer, King City, Klamath Falls, La Grande, La Pine, Lafayette, Lake Oswego, Lebanon, Lincoln City, Lowell, Lyons, Madras, Malin, Manzanita, Maupin, Maywood Park, McMinnville, Medford, Merrill, Metolius, Mill City, Millersburg, Milton-Freewater, Milwaukie, Mitchell, Molalla, Monmouth, Moro, Mosier, Mount Angel, Myrtle Creek, Myrtle Point, Nehalem, Newberg, Newport, North Bend, North Plains, Nyssa, Oakridge, Ontario, Oregon City, Pendleton, Philomath, Phoenix, Pilot Rock, Port Orford, Portland, Prescott, Prineville, Rainier, Redmond, Reedsport, Rivergrove, Rockaway Beach, Rogue River, Roseburg, Rufus, Saint Helens, Salem, Sandy, Scappoose, Scio, Scotts Mills, Seaside, Shady Cove, Shaniko, Sheridan, Sherwood, Silverton, Sisters, Sodaville, Spray, Springfield, Stanfield, Stayton, Sublimity, Sutherlin, Sweet Home, Talent, Tangent, The Dalles, Tigard, Tillamook, Toledo, Troutdale, Tualatin, Turner, Ukiah, Umatilla, Vale, Veneta, Vernonia, Warrenton, Wasco, Waterloo, West Linn, Westfir, Weston, Wheeler, Willamina, Wilsonville, Winston, Wood Village, Woodburn, Yamhill. Counties: Baker County, Benton County, Clackamas County, Clatsop County, Columbia County, Coos County, Crook County, Curry County, Deschutes County, Douglas County, Harney County, Hood River County, Jackson County, Jefferson County, Josephine County, Klamath County, Lane County, Lincoln County, Linn County, Malheur County, Marion County, Multnomah County, Polk County, Sherman County, Tillamook County, Umatilla County, Union County, Wasco County, Washington County, Wheeler County, Yamhill County. R emaining jurisdictions either chose not to share data to incorporate into the public, statewide dataset or did not respond to DLCD’s request for data. These jurisdictions’ attributes are designated “not shared” in the orZDesc field and “NS” in the orZCode field.
Facebook
TwitterThis is a dataset download, not a document. The Open Document button will start the download.This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. This data layer represents the Existing Vegetation data element. This statewide grid was created by combining four independently-generated datasets: one for western Oregon (USGS zones 2 and 7), and two for eastern Oregon (USGS zones 8 and 9; forested and non-forested lands), and selected wetland types from the Oregon Wetlands geodatabase. The landcover grid for zones 2 and 7 was produced using a modification of Breiman's Random Forest classifier to model landcover. Multi-season satellite imagery (Landsat ETM+, 1999-2003) and digital elevation model (DEM) derived datasets (e.g. elevation, landform, aspect, etc.) were utilized to build two predictive models for the forested landcover classes, and the nonforested landcover classes. The grids resulting from the models were then modified to improve the distribution of the following classes: volcanic systems and wetland vegetation. Along the eastern edge, the sagebrush systems were modified to help match with the map for the adjacent region. Additional classes were then layered on top of the modified models from other sources. These include disturbed classes (harvested and burned), cliffs, riparian, and NLCD's developed, agriculture, and water classes. A validation for forest classes was performed on a withheld of the sample data to assess model performance. Due to data limitations, the nonforest classes were evaluated using the same data that were used to build the original nonforest model. Two independent grids were combined to map landcover in adjacent zones 8 and 9. Tree canopy greater than 10% (from NLCD 2001), complemented with a disturbance grid, served as a mask to delineate forested areas. A grid of non-forested areas was extracted from a larger, regional grid (Sagemap) created using decision tree classifier and other techniques. Multi-season satellite imagery (Landsat ETM+, 1999-2003) and digital elevation model (DEM) derived datasets (e.g. elevation, landform, aspect, etc.) were utilized to derive rule sets for the various landcover classes. Eleven mapping areas, each characterized by similar ecological and spectral characteristics, were modeled independently of one another and mosaicked. An internal validation for modeled classes was performed on a withheld 20% of the sample data to assess model performance. The portion of this original grid corresponding to USGS map zones 8 and 9 was extracted and split into three mapping areas (one for USGS zone 8, two for USGS zone 9: Northern Basin and Range in the south, Blue Mountains in the north) and modified to improve the distribution of the following classes: cliffs, subalpine zone, dunes, lava flows, silver sagebrush, ash beds, playas, scabland, and riparian vegetation. Agriculture and urban areas were extracted from NLCD 2001. A forest grid was generated using Gradient Nearest Neighbor (GNN) imputation process. GNN uses multivariate gradient modeling to integrate data from regional grids of field plots with satellite imagery and mapped environmental data. A suite of fine-scale plot variables is imputed to each pixel in a digital map, and regional maps can be created for most of the same vegetation attributes available from the field plots. However, due to lack of sampling plots in the southern half of zone 9, the GNN model proved unreliable there; forest data from Landfire were used instead. To compensate for known under-representation of wetlands, selected wetland types from the Oregon Wetlands Geodatabase (version 2009-1030) were converted to raster and overlaid (replaced) pixel value assignments from the previous steps just detailed. See Process Steps for more information. The ecological systems were crosswalked to landcover (based on Oregon landcover standard, modified from NLCD 2001) and to wildlife habitats (based on integrated habitats used in the Oreg
Facebook
TwitterThis is a dataset download, not a document. The Open button will start the download.Digital Elevation Model. 10m pixels. Elevation values in feet. Elevation data assembled from merged 7.5-minute DEM blocks (10- by 10-m data spacing).
Facebook
TwitterCDFW BIOS GIS Dataset, Contact: Steve Stone, Description: This dataset depicts the general boundaries of the Southern OR and Northern CA Coastal Chinook Salmon evolutionarily significant unit (ESU) (i.e., a distinct population segment (DPS) under the U.S. Endangered Species Act) as well as the historical population structure of the species.
Facebook
Twitter
Facebook
TwitterThis is a dataset download, not a document. The Open button will start the download.This data represents the map extent for current and historical USGS topographic maps for the United States and Territories, including 1 X 2 Degree, 1 X 1 Degree, 30 X 60 Minute, 15 X 15 Minute, 7.5 X 7.5 Minute, and 3.75 X 3.75 Minute. The grid was generated using ESRI ArcInfo GIS software.
Facebook
TwitterThis is a dataset download, not a document. The Open button will start the download.This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. This feature dataset contains the following feature classes: 1. FEMA Flood Insurance Study base flood elevation (BFE) lines: The FEMA_BFE feature class is a compilation of FEMA Flood Insurance Study base flood elevation (BFE) lines for the state of Oregon. The FEMA Flood Insurance Study base flood elevation (BFE) lines were derived from Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps and georeferenced paper Flood Insurance Rate Maps. 2. FEMA Flood Insurance Study inundation zones: The FEMA_FLD_HAZ_AR feature class is a compilation of FEMA Flood Insurance Study inundation zones for the state of Oregon. The FEMA Flood Insurance Study inundation zones were derived from Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps and georeferenced paper Flood Insurance Rate Maps. 3. FEMA Letter of Map Change (LOMC) Locations: The FEMA_LOMC feature class is a compilation of FEMA Letter of Map Change (LOMC) Locations for the state of Oregon. The FEMA Letter of Map Change (LOMC) Locations were downloaded from the FEMA Map Service Center Website. The LOMC points were precisely located using county-level assessor data, orthoimagery, and lidar hillshades. 4. FEMA Flood Insurance Study profile baselines: The FEMA_PROFIL_BASLN feature class is a compilation of FEMA Flood Insurance Study profile baselines for the state of Oregon. The FEMA Flood Insurance Study profile baselines were derived from Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps and paper Flood Insurance Rate Maps. 5. FEMA Flood Insurance Study cross section (XS) lines: The FEMA_XS feature class is a compilation of FEMA Flood Insurance Study cross section (XS) lines for the state of Oregon. The FEMA Flood Insurance Study cross section (XS) lines were derived from Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps and paper Flood Insurance Rate Maps. See feature class metadata for detailed information about each feature class.
Facebook
TwitterCDFW BIOS GIS Dataset, Contact: Steve Stone, Description: This dataset depicts the general boundaries of the Southern OR\Northern CA Coasts Coho Salmon evolutionarily significant unit (ESU) (i.e., a distinct population segment (DPS) under the U.S. Endangered Species Act) as well as the historical population structure of the species.
Facebook
TwitterThe Oregon Department of Forestry has three programs that are outlined by district boundaries. Use this hosted feature layer to display one or more in webmaps. Current June 7, 2019.Contact:Steve TimbrookGIS Data AdministratorAdministrative BranchInformation Technology Program - GIS UnitOregon Department of Forestrysteve.timbrook@odf.oregon.gov503.931.2755
Facebook
TwitterThis data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. Electric transmission lines as imported from DLG and traced from orthoimagery and lidar surface models. Some distribution lines could be included. NOTE These data are no longer being maintained on a regular basis. Dataset was last updated in 2020.
Facebook
TwitterTo access the tax lot layer you will need to contact the county Assessor's office. ORMAP is a statewide digital cadastral base map that is publicly accessible, continually maintained, supports the Oregon property tax system, supports a multi-purpose land information system, strives to comply with appropriate state and national standards, and will continue to be improved over time.
Facebook
TwitterCDFW BIOS GIS Dataset, Contact: CWHR California Wildlife Habitat Relationships, Description: Vector datasets of CWHR range maps are one component of California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR), a comprehensive information system and predictive model for California's wildlife. The CWHR System was developed to support habitat conservation and management, land use planning, impact assessment, education, and research involving terrestrial vertebrates in California.
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
This data release for the reconnaissance geologic map of the Hells Canyon Study Area, Wallowa County, Oregon, and Idaho and Adams Counties, Idaho, is a Geologic Map Schema (GeMS, 2020)-compliant version of the geologic map published in U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Scientific Investigations Report Map SIR 2007-5046 (Simmons, et al, 2007). The database represents the geology for the 625,177-acre (2,530 square kilometers), geologically complex Hells Canyon Study Area in two plates, at a publication scale of 1:48,000. The study area includes (1) the Hells Canyon Wilderness; (2) parts of the Snake River, Rapid River, and West Fork Rapid River Wild and Scenic Rivers; (3) lands included in the second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II); and (4) part of the Hells Canyon National Recreation Area. References: Simmons, G.C., Gualtieri, J.L., Close, T.J., Federspiel, F.E., and Leszcykowski, A.M., 2007, Mineral resources of the Hells Canyon study area, Wallowa County, Oregon, and Id ...
Facebook
TwitterDepicts the location of each water right place of use (POU) polygon and provides basic information about the associated water right. All current and individually held water rights are shown in this data set except for those held by irrigation districts, applications, temporary transfers, instream leases, and limited licenses.Current code definitions at: https://www.oregon.gov/owrd/WRDFormsPDF/wris_code_key.pdf.Compilation procedures document at: https://arcgis.wrd.state.or.us/data/OWRD_WR_GIS_procedures.pdf.
Facebook
TwitterElevation Point Cloud data is available from various sources. Visit the links below or contact Reed Burgette (reed.burgette@dogami.oregon.gov) at Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) for more information. Resources: https://gis.dogami.oregon.gov/maps/lidarviewer/ ftp://lidar.engr.oregonstate.edu/ https://coast.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/ https://www.usgs.gov/programs/national-geospatial-program/national-map
Facebook
TwitterThis is a dataset download, not a document. The Open button will start the download.This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. The Oregon Biodiversity Information Center (ORBIC), part of the Institute for Natural Resources (INR) within the Oregon University System, has been the steward of Oregon’s protected areas data since 1989. This data is incorporated into the NavigatOR GIS utility and the national US protected areas database maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey. New data in Oregon on conservation easements and newly developed protected area maps from local land trusts and County and City governments were incorporated in 2011-2013. The result is a very comprehensive map and protected areas database for Oregon. Updates and edits will continue to be made to improve the dataset.
Facebook
TwitterThe new Oregon Address Geocoder is used to find the location coordinates for street addresses in the State of Oregon. This service is:Free PublicUpdated regularlyOutputs location coordinates in Oregon Lambert, feet (SRID 2992)Uses over 2 million address points and 288,000 streets for referenceIt is an ArcGIS multirole locator with two roles:Point Address - Generally more accurate results from rooftop location points. Includes a Subaddress if a unit number is located. Street Address - Less accurate results from an estimated distance along a street centerline address range if a Point Address was not found.Instructions for using the Geocoder via ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, and REST Services are below:ArcGIS ProWeb ServicesArcGIS Online
Facebook
TwitterThis is a dataset download, not a document. The Open button will start the download.This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. Monthly 30-year "normal" dataset covering Oregon, averaged over the climatological period 1991-2020. Contains spatially gridded average annual total precipitation at 800m (30 arc-second) grid cell resolution. Distribution of the point measurements to the spatial grid was accomplished using the PRISM model, developed and applied by Dr. Christopher Daly of the PRISM Climate Group at Oregon State University. This dataset is available free-of-charge on the PRISM website.
Facebook
TwitterThis feature class is a compliation GIS dataset that contains building footprints depicting building shape and location in the state of Oregon. All contributing datasets were compiled into the stateside dataset. Static datasets or infrequently maintained datasets were reviewed for quality. New building footprint data were reviewed and digitized from 2017 and 2018 imagery accessed from the Oregon Statewide Imagery Program.
Facebook
TwitterThis data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. This theme contains PLS lines for the State of Oregon. This PLS theme includes donation claims lands. Attributes in this theme show Township Range and Section values.