51 datasets found
  1. d

    TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019, state, Oregon, Current County Subdivision...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Oct 12, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2021). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019, state, Oregon, Current County Subdivision State-based [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2019-state-oregon-current-county-subdivision-state-based
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 12, 2021
    Area covered
    Oregon
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. County subdivisions are the primary divisions of counties and their equivalent entities for the reporting of Census Bureau data. They include legally- recognized minor civil divisions (MCDs) and statistical census county divisions (CCDs), and unorganized territories. For the 2010 Census, the MCDs are the primary governmental and/or administrative divisions of counties in 29 States and Puerto Rico; Tennessee changed from having CCDs for Census 2000 to having MCDs for the 2010 Census. In MCD States where no MCD exists or is not defined, the Census Bureau creates statistical unorganized territories to complete coverage. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas are covered by county subdivisions. The boundaries of most legal MCDs are as of January 1, 2019, as reported through the Census Bureau's Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS). The boundaries of all CCDs, delineated in 20 states, are those as reported as part of the Census Bureau's Participant Statistical Areas Program (PSAP) for the 2010 Census.

  2. 2020 Cartographic Boundary File (SHP), Current County Subdivision for...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Dec 14, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Customer Engagement Branch (Point of Contact) (2023). 2020 Cartographic Boundary File (SHP), Current County Subdivision for Oregon, 1:500,000 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/2020-cartographic-boundary-file-shp-current-county-subdivision-for-oregon-1-500000
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    Description

    The 2020 cartographic boundary shapefiles are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. County subdivisions are the primary divisions of counties and their equivalent entities for the reporting of Census Bureau data. They include legally-recognized minor civil divisions (MCDs) and statistical census county divisions (CCDs), and unorganized territories. In MCD states where no MCD exists or no MCD is defined, the Census Bureau creates statistical unorganized territories to complete coverage. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas are covered by county subdivisions. The generalized boundaries of legal MCDs are based on those as of January 1, 2020 as reported through the Census Bureau's Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS). The generalized boundaries of all CCDs, delineated in 21 states, are those as reported as part of the Census Bureau's Participant Statistical Areas Program (PSAP) for the 2020 Census.

  3. W

    DIGITAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DATABASE, COOS COUNTY, OREGON, USA

    • cloud.csiss.gmu.edu
    • gimi9.com
    • +5more
    Updated Mar 8, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States (2021). DIGITAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DATABASE, COOS COUNTY, OREGON, USA [Dataset]. https://cloud.csiss.gmu.edu/uddi/dataset/digital-flood-insurance-rate-map-database-coos-county-oregon-usa
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 8, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    United States
    Area covered
    Coos County, Oregon, United States
    Description

    The Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) Database depicts flood risk Information And supporting data used to develop the risk data. The primary risk; classificatons used are the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event, the 0.2-percent- annual-chance flood event, and areas of minimal flood risk. The DFIRM Database is derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data, where available. The FISs and FIRMs are published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The file is georeferenced to earth's surface using the UTM projection and coordinate system. The specifications for the horizontal control of DFIRM data files are consistent with those required for mapping at a scale of 1:12,000.

  4. o

    Zoning

    • geohub.oregon.gov
    • data.oregon.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Jul 19, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    State of Oregon (2023). Zoning [Dataset]. https://geohub.oregon.gov/datasets/oregon-geo::zoning
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 19, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    State of Oregon
    Area covered
    Description

    This Zoning feature class is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework statewide, Zoning spatial data. This version is authorized for public use. Attributes include zoning districts that have been generalized to state classes. As of June 30, 2023, this feature class contains zoning data from 229 local jurisdictions. DLCD plans to continue adding to and updating this statewide zoning dataset as they receive zoning information from the local jurisdictions. Jurisdictions included in the latest version of the statewide zoning geodatabase:

    Cities: Adams, Adrian, Albany, Amity, Antelope, Ashland, Astoria, Athena, Aurora, Banks, Barlow, Bay City, Beaverton, Bend, Boardman, Bonanza, Brookings, Brownsville, Burns, Butte Falls, Canby, Cannon Beach, Carlton, Cascade Locks, Cave Junction, Central Point, Chiloquin, Coburg, Columbia City, Coos Bay, Cornelius, Corvallis, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Culver, Dayton, Detroit, Donald, Drain, Dufur, Dundee, Dunes City, Durham, Eagle Point, Echo, Enterprise, Estacada, Eugene, Fairview, Falls City, Florence, Forest Grove, Fossil, Garibaldi, Gaston, Gates, Gearhart, Gervais, Gladstone, Gold Beach, Gold Hill, Grants Pass, Grass Valley, Gresham, Halsey, Happy Valley, Harrisburg, Helix, Hermiston, Hillsboro, Hines, Hood River, Hubbard, Idanha, Independence, Jacksonville, Jefferson, Johnson City, Jordan Valley, Junction City, Keizer, King City, Klamath Falls, La Grande, La Pine, Lafayette, Lake Oswego, Lebanon, Lincoln City, Lowell, Lyons, Madras, Malin, Manzanita, Maupin, Maywood Park, McMinnville, Medford, Merrill, Metolius, Mill City, Millersburg, Milton-Freewater, Milwaukie, Mitchell, Molalla, Monmouth, Moro, Mosier, Mount Angel, Myrtle Creek, Myrtle Point, Nehalem, Newberg, Newport, North Bend, North Plains, Nyssa, Oakridge, Ontario, Oregon City, Pendleton, Philomath, Phoenix, Pilot Rock, Port Orford, Portland, Prescott, Prineville, Rainier, Redmond, Reedsport, Rivergrove, Rockaway Beach, Rogue River, Roseburg, Rufus, Saint Helens, Salem, Sandy, Scappoose, Scio, Scotts Mills, Seaside, Shady Cove, Shaniko, Sheridan, Sherwood, Silverton, Sisters, Sodaville, Spray, Springfield, Stanfield, Stayton, Sublimity, Sutherlin, Sweet Home, Talent, Tangent, The Dalles, Tigard, Tillamook, Toledo, Troutdale, Tualatin, Turner, Ukiah, Umatilla, Vale, Veneta, Vernonia, Warrenton, Wasco, Waterloo, West Linn, Westfir, Weston, Wheeler, Willamina, Wilsonville, Winston, Wood Village, Woodburn, Yamhill.

    Counties: Baker County, Benton County, Clackamas County, Clatsop County, Columbia County, Coos County, Crook County, Curry County, Deschutes County, Douglas County, Harney County, Hood River County, Jackson County, Jefferson County, Josephine County, Klamath County, Lane County, Lincoln County, Linn County, Malheur County, Marion County, Multnomah County, Polk County, Sherman County, Tillamook County, Umatilla County, Union County, Wasco County, Washington County, Wheeler County, Yamhill County.

    R emaining jurisdictions either chose not to share data to incorporate into the public, statewide dataset or did not respond to DLCD’s request for data. These jurisdictions’ attributes are designated “not shared” in the orZDesc field and “NS” in the orZCode field.

  5. d

    ORMAP The Oregon Property Tax Map

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.oregon.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 29, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.oregon.gov (2025). ORMAP The Oregon Property Tax Map [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/ormap-the-oregon-property-tax-map
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 29, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    data.oregon.gov
    Area covered
    Oregon
    Description

    To access the tax lot layer you will need to contact the county Assessor's office. ORMAP is a statewide digital cadastral base map that is publicly accessible, continually maintained, supports the Oregon property tax system, supports a multi-purpose land information system, strives to comply with appropriate state and national standards, and will continue to be improved over time.

  6. DIGITAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DATABASE, COOS COUNTY, OREGON, USA

    • datasets.ai
    • gimi9.com
    • +1more
    0
    Updated Sep 11, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security (2024). DIGITAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DATABASE, COOS COUNTY, OREGON, USA [Dataset]. https://datasets.ai/datasets/digital-flood-insurance-rate-map-database-coos-county-oregon-usa
    Explore at:
    0Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 11, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Homeland Securityhttp://www.dhs.gov/
    Federal Emergency Management Agencyhttp://www.fema.gov/
    Authors
    Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security
    Area covered
    Coos County, United States, Oregon
    Description

    The Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) Database depicts flood risk information and supporting data used to develop the risk data. The primary risk classifications used are the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event, the 0.2-percent-annual- chance flood event, and areas of minimal flood risk. The DFIRM Database is derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data, where available. The FISs and FIRMs are published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

  7. a

    Contours 2ft - Jacksonville

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Dec 18, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jackson County GIS (2019). Contours 2ft - Jacksonville [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/2bfe3bb271a64bc49d823a762727a510
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 18, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Jackson County GIS
    Description

    Use the app to find the downloadable area within Jackson County - 2 Foot Contour MapThe 2-foot Contour Map shows contours that were derived from several different LiDAR projects in the Rogue Valley over the last 10 years. The map can be used to both download and view the contour data. To use the map, search or zoom in to an address. When zoomed in to a specific scale, the map will change from the downloadable areas layer to 2-foot interval contour lines. The LiDAR Project Dates layer can be used to identify the date when the elevation was collected in an area. Please note that data is available only for the valley floor areas at this time.The 2ft contours were created from 1-meter pixel DEM and then cleaned to remove very small elevation changes and to create a smooth contour line. This information should not be used to create topographic surveys or other applications where the precise elevation of a location is required. For additional information on LiDAR in Oregon or to download the source data, please visit the DOGAMI Lidar Viewer.The downloadable data is a zipped ESRI Shapefile and is projected to Oregon State Plane South (Intl Feet) with NAD 1983 datum.

  8. a

    City and County Comprehensive Plan Designations

    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    • data.oregon.gov
    • +4more
    Updated May 31, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    State of Oregon (2019). City and County Comprehensive Plan Designations [Dataset]. https://arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/76882e24c07b41949bfdd5a6a0e60b81
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    State of Oregon
    Area covered
    Description

    The data was collected from local jurisdictions in the state and then assembled into a single dataset. The attributes were generalized to a set of comp plan codes that could be applied to data from all jurisdictions. The list of state comp plan codes and their descriptions can be found in this metadata. Please contact the local jurisdictions for the more detailed (not generalized) data. As of May 31, 2019 this feature class contains comprehensive plan data from 189 local jurisdictions. DLCD plans to continue adding to and updating this statewide comp plan dataset as they receive information from the local jurisdictions. New releases of this data by DLCD are planned for publication every 2 years. Note: This data layer has gaps in the data and is not complete for the entire state of Oregon. Participating cities and counties are listed below. City data included:Adams, Adrian, Albany, Amity, Arlington, Ashland, Athena, Aumsville, Aurora, Baker City, Bandon, Bay City, Bend, Burns, Canby, Cannon Beach, Canyonville, Carlton, Cave Junction, Central Point, Clatskanie, Coburg, Columbia City, Condon, Coos Bay, Corvallis, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Culver, Dallas, Depoe Bay, Detroit, Donald, Dufur, Dundee, Dunes City, Eagle Point, Enterprise, Eugene, Falls City, Florence, Garibaldi, Gaston, Gates, Gearhart, Gervais, Glendale, Gold Hill, Grants Pass, Grass Valley, Haines, Harrisburg, Hermiston, Hines, Hubbard, Huntington, Idanha, Independence, Jacksonville, Jefferson, Jordan Valley, Joseph, Junction City, Keizer, La Pine, Lafayette, Lakeview, Lebanon, Lincoln City, Lostine, Lowell, Lyons, Madras, Malin, Manzanita, Maupin, Medford, Metolius, Mill City, Millersburg, Milton-Freewater, Monmouth, Mosier, Mt. Angel, Myrtle Creek, Nehalem, Newberg, Newport, North Bend, Nyssa, Oakridge, Ontario, Paisley, Philomath, Phoenix, Prineville, Redmond, Richland, Riddle, Rockaway Beach, Rogue River, Roseburg, Salem, Scappoose, Scio, Scotts Mills, Seaside, Seneca, Shady Cove, Shaniko, Sheridan, Silverton, Sisters, Sodaville, St. Helens, St. Paul, Stanfield, Stayton, Sublimity, Sweet Home, Talent, Tangent, The Dalles, Tillamook, Turner, Umatilla, Vale, Veneta, Vernonia, Wallowa, Westfir, Wheeler, Willamina, Woodburn and all the cities in Metro.County data included:Baker, Benton, Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Coos, Crook, Deschutes, Douglas, Grant, Harney, Hood River, Jackson, Jefferson, Josephine, Klamath, Lake, Lane, Linn, Malheur, Marion, Multnomah, Polk, Tillamook, Umatilla, Wallowa, Wasco, Washington and Yamhill

  9. W

    Floodplain Mapping Submission for Douglas County, Oregon

    • cloud.csiss.gmu.edu
    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    • +2more
    Updated Mar 5, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States (2021). Floodplain Mapping Submission for Douglas County, Oregon [Dataset]. https://cloud.csiss.gmu.edu/uddi/dataset/floodplain-mapping-submission-for-douglas-county-oregon1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 5, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    United States
    Area covered
    Douglas County, Oregon
    Description

    The Floodplain Mapping study deliverables depict and quantify the flood risks for the study area. The primary risk classifications used are the 1-percent annual chance flood event, the 0.2-percent annual chance flood event, and areas of minimal flood risk. The Floodplain Mapping flood risk boundaries are derived from the engineering information Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data. The FISs and FIRMs are published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

  10. a

    OR Counties Shapefile

    • usfs.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2023). OR Counties Shapefile [Dataset]. https://usfs.hub.arcgis.com/maps/usfs::or-counties-shapefile
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 4, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    U.S. Forest Service
    Area covered
    Description

    This theme is a graphic depiction of the legal jurisdictional county perimeters for the State of Oregon.

  11. j

    Jackson Josephine Counties

    • gis.jacksoncounty.org
    Updated Jan 28, 2014
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jackson County GIS (2014). Jackson Josephine Counties [Dataset]. https://gis.jacksoncounty.org/datasets/c9510ee1a96d4a50bbd1c26ca70bd013
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 28, 2014
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Jackson County GIS
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset was created by Jackson County GIS by incoorporating fuels treatment data from various State, Local, and Federal agencies responsible for maintaining fuels treatment data. The feature class was developed for use within the Community and Agency Fuels Effectiveness (CAFE) map hosted by Jackson County through a federal grant. The fuels treatments are updated at least annually based on agency input.

  12. o

    2020 Census Tracts

    • geohub.oregon.gov
    • data.oregon.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Jul 1, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    State of Oregon (2020). 2020 Census Tracts [Dataset]. https://geohub.oregon.gov/datasets/2020-census-tracts/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 1, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    State of Oregon
    Area covered
    Description

    This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation.

    Census tracts are small, relatively permanent statistical subdivisions of a county or equivalent entity, and were defined by local participants as part of the 2020 Census Participant Statistical Areas Program. The Census Bureau delineated the census tracts in situations where no local participant existed or where all the potential participants declined to participate. The primary purpose of census tracts is to provide a stable set of geographic units for the presentation of census data and comparison back to previous decennial censuses. Census tracts generally have a population size between 1,200 and 8,000 people, with an optimum size of 4,000 people. When first delineated, census tracts were designed to be homogeneous with respect to population characteristics, economic status, and living conditions. The spatial size of census tracts varies widely depending on the density of settlement. Physical changes in street patterns caused by highway construction, new development, and so forth, may require boundary revisions. In addition, census tracts occasionally are split due to population growth, or combined as a result of substantial population decline. Census tract boundaries generally follow visible and identifiable features. They may follow legal boundaries such as minor civil division (MCD) or incorporated place boundaries in some States and situations to allow for census tract-to-governmental unit relationships where the governmental boundaries tend to remain unchanged between censuses. State and county boundaries always are census tract boundaries in the standard census geographic hierarchy. In a few rare instances, a census tract may consist of noncontiguous areas. These noncontiguous areas may occur where the census tracts are coextensive with all or parts of legal entities that are themselves noncontiguous. For the 2010 Census and beyond, the census tract code range of 9400 through 9499 was enforced for census tracts that include a majority American Indian population according to Census 2000 data and/or their area was primarily covered by federally recognized American Indian reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands; the code range 9800 through 9899 was enforced for those census tracts that contained little or no population and represented a relatively large special land use area such as a National Park, military installation, or a business/industrial park; and the code range 9900 through 9998 was enforced for those census tracts that contained only water area, no land area.

  13. d

    Digital data for the geologic map of Scoggins Dam, Henry Hagg Lake, and...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jul 20, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). Digital data for the geologic map of Scoggins Dam, Henry Hagg Lake, and Scoggins Valley, Washington County, Oregon [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/digital-data-for-the-geologic-map-of-scoggins-dam-henry-hagg-lake-and-scoggins-valley-wash
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 20, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Area covered
    Henry Hagg Lake Loop Trail, Washington County, Oregon, Southwest Scoggins Valley Road
    Description

    Scoggins Dam in northwest Oregon lies within the Gales Creek fault zone (GCF), a northwest-striking system of active faults forming the boundary between the Coast Range and the Tualatin Valley about 25 km east of Portland, Oregon. Geologic mapping published in 2020 shows the dam to lie within a block-faulted releasing stepover between the right-lateral, NW-striking Scoggins Creek and Parsons Creek strands of the GCF. The Scoggins Creek strand is presently mapped beneath the existing dam about 200 m north of the south abutment. Preliminary results from paleoseismic trenching by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Portland State University, and the U.S. Geological Survey indicate that these two major fault strands have had multiple surface rupturing earthquakes in the Holocene. To confirm the accuracy of the 2020 geologic map and the geometry of the GCF in the releasing stepover region, we completed additional geologic mapping of the dam, reservoir, and an alternative dam site downstream between July 2018 and May 2020. Using high-resolution lidar topographic data and satellite imagery on handheld digital tablets, we collected data at ~500 field sites in the heavily forested terrain. We used these detailed field observations to locate and digitally map the main Scoggins Creek and Parsons Creek fault strands, as well as the cross faults linking the two main strands, to produce an improved and more detailed geologic map and cross sections of Scoggins Valley and its existing and proposed dam sites.

  14. a

    City Limits (2009)

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Oct 22, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oregon ArcGIS Online (2015). City Limits (2009) [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/712341ca52d147ba9fbb2229ae18adb4
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 22, 2015
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oregon ArcGIS Online
    Area covered
    Description

    This map represents the Oregon City Limit boundaries. Each city limit is defined as a continuous area within the statutory boundary of an incorporated city, which is the smallest subdivision of an annexed area, as of 2009.

    An incorporated city may have multiple areas that are not contiguous. Each such area is represented separately with its own polygon (boundary on map).

    Metadata https://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/details;id=fc688695127e4cb9b59d800657b2d600 Download http://navigator.state.or.us/sdl/data/shapefile/k24/citylim_2009.zip

  15. Ownership and Admin Boundaries

    • nifc.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jul 11, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Interagency Fire Center (2019). Ownership and Admin Boundaries [Dataset]. https://nifc.hub.arcgis.com/maps/d3342f8b19df4b9ebea46a2ba0772804
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 11, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    National Interagency Fire Centerhttps://www.nifc.gov/
    Area covered
    Description

    Oregon Ownership and Admin Boundaries managed by Oregon Department of Forestry (2021).This includes Public Ownership, Counties, ODF Forest Protection Districts, and ODF Units, for the entire State of Oregon. This is only an export of the master data and is not updated on a regular schedule. Please see the source data to ensure accuracy and ensure it is up to date. Last updated on 7/11/2021, BRM..Useful Links:www.oregon.gov/odfhttps://www.oregon.gov/ODF/AboutODF/Pages/MapsData

  16. DIGITAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DATABASE, YAMHILL COUNTY, OREGON

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Nov 8, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Federal Emergency Management Agency (Point of Contact) (2023). DIGITAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DATABASE, YAMHILL COUNTY, OREGON [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/digital-flood-insurance-rate-map-database-yamhill-county-oregon
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 8, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Federal Emergency Management Agencyhttp://www.fema.gov/
    Area covered
    Yamhill County, Oregon
    Description

    The Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) Database depicts flood risk information and supporting data used to develop the risk data. The primary risk classifications used are the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event, the 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood event, and areas of minimal flood risk. The DFIRM Database is derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data, where available. The FISs and FIRMs are published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The file is georeferenced to earth's surface using the State Plane projection and coordinate system. The specifications for the horizontal control of DFIRM data files are consistent with those required for mapping at a scale of 1:12000.

  17. j

    Contours 2ft - Ruch

    • gis.jacksoncountyor.gov
    • gis-jcgis.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Dec 18, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jackson County GIS (2019). Contours 2ft - Ruch [Dataset]. https://gis.jacksoncountyor.gov/datasets/99dfaa6c3cad472290c0c3c24e2295dd
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 18, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Jackson County GIS
    Description

    Ruch 2ft Contours Use the app to find the downloadable area within Jackson County - 2 Foot Contour MapThe 2-foot Contour Map shows contours that were derived from several different LiDAR projects in the Rogue Valley over the last 10 years. The map can be used to both download and view the contour data. To use the map, search or zoom in to an address. When zoomed in to a specific scale, the map will change from the downloadable areas layer to 2-foot interval contour lines. The LiDAR Project Dates layer can be used to identify the date when the elevation was collected in an area. Please note that data is available only for the valley floor areas at this time.The 2ft contours were created from 1-meter pixel DEM and then cleaned to remove very small elevation changes and to create a smooth contour line. This information should not be used to create topographic surveys or other applications where the precise elevation of a location is required. For additional information on LiDAR in Oregon or to download the source data, please visit the DOGAMI Lidar Viewer.The downloadable data is a zipped ESRI Shapefile and is projected to Oregon State Plane South (Intl Feet) with NAD 1983 datum.

  18. DIGITAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DATABASE, LANE COUNTY, OREGON,USA

    • s.cnmilf.com
    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Nov 8, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Federal Emergency Management Agency (Point of Contact) (2023). DIGITAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP DATABASE, LANE COUNTY, OREGON,USA [Dataset]. https://s.cnmilf.com/user74170196/https/catalog.data.gov/dataset/digital-flood-insurance-rate-map-database-lane-county-oregonusa
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 8, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Federal Emergency Management Agencyhttp://www.fema.gov/
    Area covered
    Lane County, Oregon, United States
    Description

    FEMA Framework Basemap datasets comprise six of the seven FGDC themes of geospatial data that are used by most GIS applications (Note: the seventh framework theme, orthographic imagery, is packaged in a separate NFIP Metadata Profile): cadastral, geodetic control, governmental unit, transportation, general structures, hydrography (water areas & lines. These data include an encoding of the geographic extent of the features and a minimal number of attributes needed to identify and describe the features. (Source: Circular A16, p. 13)

  19. j

    Urban Growth Boundary

    • gis.jacksoncountyor.gov
    • gis.jacksoncounty.org
    Updated Sep 9, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jackson County GIS (2015). Urban Growth Boundary [Dataset]. https://gis.jacksoncountyor.gov/datasets/JCGIS::urban-growth-boundary/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 9, 2015
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Jackson County GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    This theme delineates Urban Growth Boundaries (UGBs) in the state of Oregon. Oregon land use laws limit development outside of urban growth boundaries. The line work was created by various sources including the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD), the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Metro Regional Council of Governments (Metro), county and city GIS departments, and the Oregon Department of Administrative Services - Geospatial Enterprise Office (DAS-GEO).

  20. d

    Data Release for Luminescence: Geologic map of Scoggins Dam, Henry Hagg...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    Updated Jul 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). Data Release for Luminescence: Geologic map of Scoggins Dam, Henry Hagg Lake, and the Scoggins Valley area, Washington County, Oregon [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/data-release-for-luminescence-geologic-map-of-scoggins-dam-henry-hagg-lake-and-the-scoggin
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Area covered
    Washington County, Oregon, Southwest Scoggins Valley Road, Henry Hagg Lake
    Description

    The Bureau of Reclamation's Scoggins Dam lies within the Gales Creek fault zone southwest of Hillsboro, Oregon. Recent geologic mapping shows the dam to overlie a potentially active strand of the fault. This report describes the geology of the dam in detail and confirms that the dam overlies a strand of the Gales Creek fault. The report documents small faults in the reservoir and off the north end of the dam along the Parsons Creek strand of the fault. The report further documents the geology of an alternative dam site downstream of the existing dam.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
(2021). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019, state, Oregon, Current County Subdivision State-based [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2019-state-oregon-current-county-subdivision-state-based

TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019, state, Oregon, Current County Subdivision State-based

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Oct 12, 2021
Area covered
Oregon
Description

The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. County subdivisions are the primary divisions of counties and their equivalent entities for the reporting of Census Bureau data. They include legally- recognized minor civil divisions (MCDs) and statistical census county divisions (CCDs), and unorganized territories. For the 2010 Census, the MCDs are the primary governmental and/or administrative divisions of counties in 29 States and Puerto Rico; Tennessee changed from having CCDs for Census 2000 to having MCDs for the 2010 Census. In MCD States where no MCD exists or is not defined, the Census Bureau creates statistical unorganized territories to complete coverage. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas are covered by county subdivisions. The boundaries of most legal MCDs are as of January 1, 2019, as reported through the Census Bureau's Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS). The boundaries of all CCDs, delineated in 20 states, are those as reported as part of the Census Bureau's Participant Statistical Areas Program (PSAP) for the 2010 Census.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu