100+ datasets found
  1. o

    Property Gateway

    • accessoakland.oakgov.com
    • detroitdata.org
    • +1more
    Updated Apr 23, 2013
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2013). Property Gateway [Dataset]. https://accessoakland.oakgov.com/datasets/property-gateway
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 23, 2013
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Description

    Oakland County's public-facing parcel viewer. Oakland County staff and CVTs can request free accounts by contacting the Oakland County Service Center (servicecenter@oakgov.com, 248-858-8812). More information about the products available in Property Gateway can be found here: https://www.oakgov.com/propertygateway/Pages/default.aspx.

  2. D

    OC Tax Parcels (Public)

    • detroitdata.org
    • accessoakland.oakgov.com
    • +5more
    Updated Nov 10, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2020). OC Tax Parcels (Public) [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/oc-tax-parcels-public1
    Explore at:
    arcgis geoservices rest api, csv, html, kml, zip, geojsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 10, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE.
    A spatial representation of Tax Parcels. Key attributes include KeyPIN. The KeyPIN is the unique parcel identification number used to link the tax parcel to the parcel attributes which are stored and maintained in Oakland County land records.


    There is no definite accuracy related to parcel boundaries. The information shown on these maps is for representation purposes only and is not intended to be a legally recorded map or survey. The information was compiled from a number of sources including recorded deeds, plats, tax maps surveys and other public records and data. Users of this data should consult the information sources listed above for verification of the information.


  3. D

    Property Gateway

    • detroitdata.org
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Apr 28, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2017). Property Gateway [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/property-gateway3
    Explore at:
    html, arcgis geoservices rest apiAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 28, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Description

    Property Gateway is a leading-edge Internet tool built to provide free and fee-based online access to Oakland County's land and property information including tax parcel reports and maps. Reports and maps can be purchased via a credit card transaction; recurring users request a business account. Visit Property Gateway, HERE.

  4. a

    Michigan Forest Land Ownership 2019

    • usfs.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 14, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2021). Michigan Forest Land Ownership 2019 [Dataset]. https://usfs.hub.arcgis.com/maps/f1a15650f89f4da794030f65044f7ef9
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 14, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    U.S. Forest Service
    Area covered
    Description

    This geospatial dataset depicts ownership patterns of forest land across Michigan, circa 2019. The data sources are listed below. The first seven sources of data supersede the final data source. The final data source is modeled from Forest Inventory and Analysis points from 2012-2017 and the most up-to-date publicly available boundaries of federal, state, and tribal lands.1.MI_State_Boundary_Census_Gov_2019.shp (State of MI boundary) clipped from cb_2019_us_state_500k from https://www.census.gov/geographies/mapping-files/time-series/geo/cartographic-boundary.html2.NPS_Land_Resources_Division_MI.shp clipped from NPS_-_Land_Resources_Division_Boundary_and_Tract_Data_Service-shp taken from https://public-nps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/nps-land-resources-division-boundary-and-tract-data-service/data?layer=1Published December 12, 2019This service depicts National Park Service tract and boundary data that was created by the Land Resources Division. NPS Director's Order #25 states: "Land status maps will be prepared to identify the ownership of the lands within the authorized boundaries of the park unit. These maps, showing ownership and acreage, are the 'official record' of the acreage of Federal and non-federal lands within the park boundaries. While these maps are the official record of the lands and acreage within the unit's authorized boundaries, they are not of survey quality and not intended to be used for survey purposes." As such this data is intended for use as a tool for GIS analysis. It is in no way intended for engineering or legal purposes. The data accuracy is checked against best available sources which may be dated and vary by location. NPS assumes no liability for use of this data. The boundary polygons represent the current legislated boundary of a given NPS unit. NPS does not necessarily have full fee ownership or hold another interest (easement, right of way, etc...) in all parcels contained within this boundary. Equivalently NPS may own or have an interest in parcels outside the legislated boundary of a given unit. In order to obtain complete information about current NPS interests both inside and outside a unit’s legislated boundary tract level polygons are also created by NPS Land Resources Division and should be used in conjunction with this boundary data. To download this data directly from the NPS go to https://irma.nps.gov/App/Portal/Home Property ownership data is compiled from deeds, plats, surveys, and other source data. These are not engineering quality drawings and should be used for administrative purposes only. The National Park Service (NPS) shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. These data and related graphics are not legal documents and are not intended to be used as such. The information contained in these data is dynamic and may change over time. The data are not better than the original sources from which they were derived. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data appropriately and consistent within the limitations of geospatial data in general and these data in particular. The related graphics are intended to aid the data user in acquiring relevant data; it is not appropriate to use the related graphics as data. The National Park Service gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. It is strongly recommended that these data are directly acquired from an NPS server and not indirectly through other sources which may have changed the data in some way. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the National Park Service, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the utility of the data on another system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data and aggregate use with other data. Terms of UseProperty ownership data is compiled from deeds, plats, surveys, and other source data. These are not engineering quality drawings and should be used for administrative purposes only. The National Park Service shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. These data and related graphics are not legal documents and are not intended to be used as such. The information contained in these data is dynamic and may change over time. The data are not better than the original sources from which they were derived. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data appropriately and consistent within the limitations of geospatial data in general and these data in particular. The related graphics are intended to aid the data user in acquiring relevant data; it is not appropriate to use the related graphics as data. The National Park Service gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. It is strongly recommended that these data are directly acquired from an NPS server and not indirectly through other sources which may have changed the data in some way. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the National Park Service, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the utility of the data on another system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data and aggregate use with other data.3.Isle Royale.shp only Isle Royale clipped from MI_State_Boundary_Census_Gov_2019.shp4.FWSInterest_MI.shp (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) clipped from FWSInterest from FWSInterest_Apr2020.zipfrom https://www.fws.gov/gis/data/CadastralDB/index_cadastral.html (being moved on 6/26/2020)Use inttype1 = OThis data layer depicts lands and waters administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in North America, U.S. Trust Territories and Possessions. It may also include inholdings that are not administered by USFWS. The primary source for this information is the USFWS Realty program.5.surfaceownership_MI.shp (U.S. National Forest Service) clipped from S_USA.SurfaceOwnership.gdb and downloaded fromhttps://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.phphttps://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?xmlKeyword=surfaceownershiprefreshed May 26, 2020Used NFSLandU_4 field and surfaceO_3 and surfaceO_3 to identify NFS parcelsAn area depicting ownership parcels of the surface estate. Each surface ownership parcel is tied to a particular legal transaction. The same individual or organization may currently own many parcels that may or may not have been acquired through the same legal transaction. Therefore, they are captured as separate entities rather than merged together. This is in contrast to Basic Ownership, in which the surface ownership parcels having the same owner are merged together. Basic Ownership provides the general user with the Forest Service versus non-Forest Service view of land ownership within National Forest boundaries. Surface Ownership provides the land status user with a current snapshot of ownership within National Forest boundaries.6.MichiganDNR_02062020.shp (State of Michigan) from the State of MI delivered @ email on 5/14/2020Has State forests, State Wildlife areas, and State parks.7.The previous public ownership layers supersede this Sass et al. (2020) layer.In Sass et al. (2020), the nonforest areas are masked out.Identification_Information:Citation:Citation_Information:Originator: Sass, Emma M.Originator: Butler, Brett J.Originator: Markowski-Lindsay, Marla Publication_Date: 2020Title:Estimated distribution of forest ownership across the conterminous United States – geospatial datasetGeospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital dataPublication_Information:Publication_Place: Fort Collins, COPublisher: Forest Service Research Data ArchiveEight values of ownership type:1 = Family (Private): Owned by families, individuals, trusts, estates, family partnerships, and other unincorporated groups of individuals that own forest land. FIACode 45.2 = Corporate (Private): Owned by corporations. FIA Code 41.3 = TIMO/REIT (Private): Owned by Timber Investment Management Organizations or Real Estate Investment Trusts. Included in FIA Code 414 = Other Private (Private): Owned by conservation and natural resource organizations, unincorporated partnerships and associations. FIA Codes 42-43.5 = Federal (Public): Owned by the federal government. FIA Codes 11-13, 21-25.6 = State (Public): Owned by a state government. FIA Code 31.7 = Local (Public): Owned by a local government. FIA Code 32.8 = Tribal: Owned by Native American tribes. FIA Code 44.8.FIA inventory units developed by FIA, 2020

  5. K

    Oakland County, Michigan Lot Lines

    • koordinates.com
    csv, dwg, geodatabase +6
    Updated Sep 19, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2018). Oakland County, Michigan Lot Lines [Dataset]. https://koordinates.com/layer/97418-oakland-county-michigan-lot-lines/
    Explore at:
    kml, geodatabase, pdf, csv, geopackage / sqlite, shapefile, mapinfo mif, mapinfo tab, dwgAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 19, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    Geospatial data about Oakland County, Michigan Lot Lines. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

  6. K

    Wayne County, Michigan Parcels

    • koordinates.com
    csv, dwg, geodatabase +6
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Wayne County, Michigan, Wayne County, Michigan Parcels [Dataset]. https://koordinates.com/layer/108020-wayne-county-michigan-parcels/
    Explore at:
    mapinfo mif, geopackage / sqlite, kml, csv, mapinfo tab, dwg, shapefile, pdf, geodatabaseAvailable download formats
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Wayne County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    Geospatial data about Wayne County, Michigan Parcels. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

  7. a

    Parcels

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 1, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Washtenaw County (2019). Parcels [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/documents/washtenaw::parcels/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 1, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Washtenaw County
    Description

    Parcels for Washtenaw County, Michigan. Zipped file includes a shapefile and file geodatabase. See their metadata for more information. View the parcels in MapWashtenaw.

  8. a

    Monroe County Property Data Exchange

    • monroe-county-michigan-gis-monroemi.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Sep 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Monroe County - Geographic Information System (2024). Monroe County Property Data Exchange [Dataset]. https://monroe-county-michigan-gis-monroemi.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/monroe-county-property-data-exchange-1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 19, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Monroe County - Geographic Information System
    Description

    As more Property Data is created it will be published on the Property Data Exchange. We encourage you to share this mapping tool with your staff, coworkers, and the public. Although reviews of the data are conducted weekly, there still may be instances where errors are discovered. If so, we encourage you to contact the Monroe County Community Planning and Engagement Department at (734)240-3294 to assist us in correcting any errors.

  9. Michigan DNR Parcel Class

    • gis-michigan.opendata.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +2more
    Updated Aug 14, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michigan Department of Natural Resources (2019). Michigan DNR Parcel Class [Dataset]. https://gis-michigan.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/midnr::michigan-dnr-parcel-class
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 14, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Michigan Department of Natural Resourceshttp://michigan.gov/dnr
    Area covered
    Description

    Michigan DNR Parcel Classes. Updated Monthly.

  10. a

    Parcels AGO

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • home-ecgis.hub.arcgis.com
    • +2more
    Updated Oct 17, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Eaton County Michigan (2019). Parcels AGO [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/ecGIS::parcels-ago
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 17, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Eaton County Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    This hosted feature layer contains tax parcel boundaries for Eaton County, Michigan. The tax parcel attributes are updated daily, and the parcel geometry is updated twice annually in the fall and spring to reflect maintenance edits as well as land division changes.

  11. D

    Right of Way Street and Alley Vacations

    • detroitdata.org
    Updated Jan 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Detroit (2025). Right of Way Street and Alley Vacations [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/right-of-way-street-and-alley-vacations
    Explore at:
    zip, txt, gpkg, html, geojson, gdb, csv, xlsx, kml, arcgis geoservices rest apiAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 27, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    City of Detroit
    Description

    This data is intended as a reference material of street and alley vacations, but not designed for survey, accurate positioning, or legal documents. It is created as polygon feature class, vacation information based on field measurements, types of Right of Way, and citations of Journal of the Common Council (J.C.C.) and the plat Liber and Page is listed under the column titled 'Sub_Plat'. The paper maps of the Street and Alley Vacation, the raster layer version of those maps (Linen Map Markup Mosaic), and the Detroit parcel layer are used as base maps to create this data.

    The street and alley vacations were recorded from 1831 to 2022 throughout the whole city, and it will be updated weekly. The existed and/or active street and alley vacations are ready to view, the authors are working on pending and historical records.

    Red Features - Have been "Outright" vacated, meaning the right of way has become private property with no restrictions.
    Blue Features - Have been vacated with reserve of a utility easement, meaning the right of way has become private property with access rights for utility companies.

    Spatial Reference: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere

    *Note: Special values within the 'Jurisdiction' field:
    • "2" means that the feature was approved under Jurisdiction of Wayne County, the State of Michigan, or a Township that was annexed by the City of Detroit, No City record on file.
    • "1" means that the feature was approved under City of Detroit jurisdiction.
    • "0" means the feature was approved per circuit court decision. No City record on file.
    For more information please visit the Maps and Records website.

  12. p

    Property Administration Services in Michigan, United States - 22 Verified...

    • poidata.io
    csv, excel, json
    Updated Jul 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Poidata.io (2025). Property Administration Services in Michigan, United States - 22 Verified Listings Database [Dataset]. https://www.poidata.io/report/property-administration-service/united-states/michigan
    Explore at:
    csv, excel, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 27, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Poidata.io
    Area covered
    United States, Michigan
    Description

    Comprehensive dataset of 22 Property administration services in Michigan, United States as of July, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.

  13. f

    OC Current Land Use

    • data.ferndalemi.gov
    • detroitdata.org
    • +5more
    Updated Feb 17, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2021). OC Current Land Use [Dataset]. https://data.ferndalemi.gov/items/c60463c62ffa4600bdd3ffe70ee6198f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 17, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. A spatial representation of land use. The polygons contained in this feature class were derived from the Oakland County Tax Parcel feature class. Each parcel was categorized by its land use. When a parcel has multiple land uses, the dominant land use is shown. Assessing records and orthophotography were the main sources used to attribute each tax parcel with land use information. The data was collected in 2021. Key attributes are the land use and key pin (Sidwell number). Land Use stores the Land Use description for each parcel. The Key Pin is the unique Parcel Identification Number (Pin) used to link the parcel to the parcel attributes which are stored and maintained in Oakland County Land Records.

  14. d

    Land Survey Parcels 2017

    • datasets.ai
    • detroitdata.org
    • +6more
    15, 21, 25, 3, 57, 8
    Updated Aug 1, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Ferndale, Michigan (2017). Land Survey Parcels 2017 [Dataset]. https://datasets.ai/datasets/land-survey-parcels-2017-7c622
    Explore at:
    21, 8, 3, 15, 57, 25Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 1, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Ferndale, Michigan
    Description

    This dataset contains parcel level information on property and land use for parcels within the Arena District, including structure and/or lot condition and use. This dataset was created by University of Michigan students during a land survey in April 2017. Data was obtained for the Building and Conditions section of Little Caesar's Arena District Needs Assessment.


    Click here for metadata (descriptions of the fields).

  15. D

    OC Development Authority

    • detroitdata.org
    • portal.datadrivendetroit.org
    • +5more
    Updated Oct 14, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2020). OC Development Authority [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/oc-development-authority1
    Explore at:
    kml, geojson, csv, arcgis geoservices rest api, html, zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 14, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE.
    The DevelopmentAuthority polygon feature class identifies certain types of entities that encourage development/redevelopment in designated areas. This feature class currently represents Downtown Development Authorities (DDA), Tax Increment Finance Authorities (TIFA), and Local Development Finance Authorities (LDFA); however, it will also depict Corridor Improvement Authorities (CIA) and Brownfield Redevelopment Authorities (BRA) in the future. These five types of authorities have the ability to capture tax increment financing (TIF).

    The features were digitized using legal descriptions, parcel lists, and maps that were provided to the State of Michigan Office of the Great Seal and/or Oakland County Equalization by the authority. The key attributes are Name (official name of the authority), Type (the type of development authority), and DevelopmentPlan (yes/no indicating if the feature represents an area that is part of a development plan and can caputre tax increment financing).

    Tax Increment Financing is a tool used to promote redevelopment and community improvement projects by channeling funding toward projects in targeted areas. TIF is captured from the increase of property values from a base year. Millage rates from taxing jurisdictions are applied to the increased value. The resulting tax revenue is directed to the authority, rather than the appropriate jurisdiction.

    Beginning in 1994, taxing jurisdictions have the option to "opt out" of having its taxes captured by the authority. Also since 1994, school taxes may no longer be captured unless they are necessary to make payments on existing eligible obligations. For more information about TIF, see Michigan Department of Treasury's Tax Increment Financing FAQ web page at http://www.michigan.gov/treasury/0,1607,7-121-3218---F,00.html. The State of Michigan has adopted enabling legislation to allow TIF through five types of authorities. Each type of authority has a focus relating to development/redevelopment: Downtown Development Authority (PA 197 of 1975)
    • Correct and prevent deterioration in business districts
    • Encourage historic preservation
    • Promote economic growth of the districts Tax Increment Finance Authority (PA 450 of 1980)
    • Prevent urban deterioration
    • Encourage economic development and activity
    • Encourage neighborhood revitalization and historic preservation
    • Closed to new applicants since 1987
    • Allows the development of virtually any type of land use Local Development Finance Authority (PA 281 of 1986)
    • Encourage local development
    • Promote conditions of employment
    • Promote economic growth
    • Limited to business activities involving:
    • Manufacturing
    • Agricultural processing
    • High-technology activities
    • Energy production
    • Business incubators Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (PA 381 of 1996)
    • Promote revitalization, redevelopment, and reuse of certain property
    • Focus on tax reverted, blighted, or functionally obsolete property
    • MDEQ must approve brownfield redevelopment areas Corridor Improvement Authority (PA 281 of 2005)
    • Correct and prevent deterioration in business districts
    • Encourage historic preservation
    • Promote economic growth of the districts
    • Must be adjacent to a road classified as an arterial or collector
    These quasi-public entities are created by resolution through a community's governing body. CIA and LDFA boundaries may cross municipal boundaries. In the case of these multi-jurisdictional authorities, both communities must pass resolutions establishing authority. There is currently only one Joint LDFA (Cities of Southfield and Troy) and there are no CIAs in Oakland County. When the community establishes the authority, it must also define the geographic boundaries in which it will operate. DDAs and CIAs are authorized to levy and collect taxes through a special assessment on all properties within the authority boundary.

    After the authority and its boundaries are established, the authority creates a tax increment financing and development plan. The plan estimates the amount of tax increment financing that will be captured and lists specific projects on which it will be spent. It also defines the development area where the tax increment financing and projects will occur. The development area must be completely within the authority boundary; however, it may be coincident with the authority boundary.

    An authority may contain multiple development areas, each with its own development and tax increment financing plan. BRAs normally designate development areas as a one or two parcels for a specific development project, while the other types of authorities define development areas as a larger area. Also, LDFAs are only allowed to capture TIF from parcels in a permitted use, such as manufacturing.

    There may be both eliglible and inelgible parcels within a development area; however, the inelgible parcels do not participate in TIF capture. The base year used to calculate the amount of tax increment financing is set when the development plan is adopted. If the development plan is expanded at a later date, the base year could be reset for the entire development area or the capture could be calculated using multiple base years.

    The source for the base year was the tax billing code used by Oakland County Equalization. When no tax billing code was available (for communities that don't use the county's assessing system), the community was contacted to obtain the base year. When two separate authorities overlap, each authority can establish overlapping development areas. The authority that first created the development area has first claim on tax increment financing capture.

    Authority boundaries are represented using multiple features when the development area is not coincident with the authority boundary. One feature represents the development area and a second feature represents the remainder of the authority district that is not part of the development area. Multiple features are also used to represent authorities that have multiple development areas or development areas that have multiple base years.

    Brownfield Redevelopment Authorities are unique in that the authority boundaries are generally defined as the entire municipality. For this reason, the non-development areas of BRA's have been excluded from this data. The following list shows communities in Oakland County that have established a BRA: City of Auburn Hills City of Birmingham City of Farmington City of Farmington Hills City of Ferndale City of Hazel Park Charter Township of Highland Village of Holly City of Madison Heights Village of Milford County of Oakland City of Oak Park City of Pontiac City of Rochester City of Rochester Hills Charter Twp of Royal Oak City of Royal Oak City of Southfield City of Troy Charter Township of Waterford

    Source documents for the boundary of each feature were obtained from the State of Michigan Office of the Great Seal, Oakland County Equalization, and the Oakland County Treasurer's office. These could be in the form of a legal description, parcel list, and/or map.

    <span style='font-family: "Avenir Next W01", "Avenir Next W00", "Avenir Next",

  16. o

    Allison Drive Cross Street Data in Michigan Center, MI

    • ownerly.com
    Updated Jan 14, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ownerly (2022). Allison Drive Cross Street Data in Michigan Center, MI [Dataset]. https://www.ownerly.com/mi/michigan-center/allison-dr-home-details
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 14, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Ownerly
    Area covered
    Allison Drive, Michigan Center
    Description

    This dataset provides information about the number of properties, residents, and average property values for Allison Drive cross streets in Michigan Center, MI.

  17. d

    OC Parcel History

    • portal.datadrivendetroit.org
    • detroitdata.org
    • +4more
    Updated Oct 17, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2016). OC Parcel History [Dataset]. https://portal.datadrivendetroit.org/datasets/oakgov::oc-parcel-history/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 17, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. A spatial representation of parcel history. This polygon feature class is created and maintained through the use of a customized tool for parcel maintenance management. As parcel splits and combinations create child parcels, the parent parcels are saved out to the parcel history feature class. Retired tax parcels have been maintained since 1998. Right of way and alley vacations are also maintained in this feature class. Vacations have been maintained since Spring, 2005. The key attributes include parcel identification number (KeyPIN) and the creation date (RevisionDate).

  18. f

    OC Farmland Agreement

    • data.ferndalemi.gov
    • detroitdata.org
    Updated Oct 16, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2016). OC Farmland Agreement [Dataset]. https://data.ferndalemi.gov/datasets/3f5b293909844703a09d290450e172c3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 16, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Area covered
    Description

    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. A spatial representation of land that is currently protected by a Farmland Development Rights Agreement (commonly known as PA 116) with the State of Michigan. The sites were located by a recorded document search through Land Access. Polygons were created using parcels as a base when applicable and by using coordinate geometry to digitize the legal description associated with agreement. The key attributes include the start and end date of the agreement, the name of the initiator, and the liber/page of the recorded document.Each agreement was located through Land Access, Oakland County's public records tool. A search was conducted to find all recorded documents where the State of Michigan is the Grantee and the document type is an Agreement. Each search result was verified to be a current Farmland Development Rights Agreement and was then digitized. When a parcel identification number (PIN) was available, the polygon was simply copied from the Tax Parcel Feature Class. If a PIN was not available, the polygon was created using coordinate geometry. If only part of a parcel is described in the legal description, then only that part is represented in the dataset. The attribute information was also collected from Land Access.

  19. d

    Property Sales

    • data.detroitmi.gov
    • data.ferndalemi.gov
    Updated May 30, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Detroit (2025). Property Sales [Dataset]. https://data.detroitmi.gov/datasets/property-sales
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Detroit
    Area covered
    Description

    The Office of the Assessor compiles property sales data to perform an annual property sales study to adjust calculated costs of property values based on local market conditions. This dataset includes property sales data obtained for annual sales studies from 2018 to the present. While only Valid Arm's Length transactions that occurred in the two years prior to when a given sales study is finalized are included in each study, this dataset includes all sales transactions obtained to perform the sales studies, whether or not the sales transactions met inclusion criteria for a study. More information about the Sales Study is available from the Office of the Assessor.Values in categorical fields such as 'Sales Instrument' are recorded based on State of Michigan CAMA standards at the time the value was recorded. Some variation in field value codes occurs over time as a related CAMA standard is updated. CAMA standards are available from the State of Michigan Department of Treasury State Tax Commission.Click here for the Analytics Hub visualization of Property Sales.

  20. o

    Showerman Road Cross Street Data in Michigan Center, MI

    • ownerly.com
    Updated Dec 11, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ownerly (2021). Showerman Road Cross Street Data in Michigan Center, MI [Dataset]. https://www.ownerly.com/mi/michigan-center/showerman-rd-home-details
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 11, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Ownerly
    Area covered
    Michigan Center, Showerman Road
    Description

    This dataset provides information about the number of properties, residents, and average property values for Showerman Road cross streets in Michigan Center, MI.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Oakland County, Michigan (2013). Property Gateway [Dataset]. https://accessoakland.oakgov.com/datasets/property-gateway

Property Gateway

Explore at:
27 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Apr 23, 2013
Dataset authored and provided by
Oakland County, Michigan
Description

Oakland County's public-facing parcel viewer. Oakland County staff and CVTs can request free accounts by contacting the Oakland County Service Center (servicecenter@oakgov.com, 248-858-8812). More information about the products available in Property Gateway can be found here: https://www.oakgov.com/propertygateway/Pages/default.aspx.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu