ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Internal view of the parcel layer. This view contains all the attributes that can be seen by County employees.There are approximately 51,300 real property parcels in Napa County. Parcels delineate the approximate boundaries of property ownership as described in Napa County deeds, filed maps, and other source documents. GIS parcel boundaries are maintained by the Information Technology Services GIS team. Assessor Parcel Maps are created and maintained by the Assessor Division Mapping Section. Each parcel has an Assessor Parcel Number (APN) that is its unique identifier. The APN is the link to various Napa County databases containing information such as owner name, situs address, property value, land use, zoning, flood data, and other related information. Data for this map service is sourced from the Napa County Parcels dataset which is updated nightly with any recent changes made by the mapping team. There may at times be a delay between when a document is recorded and when the new parcel boundary configuration and corresponding information is available in the online GIS parcel viewer.From 1850 to early 1900s assessor staff wrote the name of the property owner and the property value on map pages. They began using larger maps, called “tank maps” because of the large steel cabinet they were kept in, organized by school district (before unification) on which names and values were written. In the 1920s, the assessor kept large books of maps by road district on which names were written. In the 1950s, most county assessors contracted with the State Board of Equalization for board staff to draw standardized 11x17 inch maps following the provisions of Assessor Handbook 215. Maps were originally drawn on linen. By the 1980’s Assessor maps were being drawn on mylar rather than linen. In the early 1990s Napa County transitioned from drawing on mylar to creating maps in AutoCAD. When GIS arrived in Napa County in the mid-1990s, the AutoCAD images were copied over into the GIS parcel layer. Sidwell, an independent consultant, was then contracted by the Assessor’s Office to convert these APN files into the current seamless ArcGIS parcel fabric for the entire County. Beginning with the 2024-2025 assessment roll, the maps are being drawn directly in the parcel fabric layer.Parcels in the GIS parcel fabric are drawn according to the legal description using coordinate geometry (COGO) drawing tools and various reference data such as Public Lands Survey section boundaries and road centerlines. The legal descriptions are not defined by the GIS parcel fabric. Any changes made in the GIS parcel fabric via official records, filed maps, and other source documents are uploaded overnight. There is always at least a 6-month delay between when a document is recorded and when the new parcel configuration and corresponding information is available in the online parcel viewer for search or download.Parcel boundary accuracy can vary significantly, with errors ranging from a few feet to several hundred feet. These distortions are caused by several factors such as: the map projection - the error derived when a spherical coordinate system model is projected into a planar coordinate system using the local projected coordinate system; and the ground to grid conversion - the distortion between ground survey measurements and the virtual grid measurements. The aim of the parcel fabric is to construct a visual interpretation that is adequate for basic geographic understanding. This digital data is intended for illustration and demonstration purposes only and is not considered a legal resource, nor legally authoritative.SFAP & CFAP DISCLAIMER: Per the California Code, RTC 606. some legal parcels may have been combined for assessment purposes (CFAP) or separated for assessment purposes (SFAP) into multiple parcels for a variety of tax assessment reasons. SFAP and CFAP parcels are assigned their own APN number and primarily result from a parcel being split by a tax rate area boundary, due to a recorded land use lease, or by request of the property owner. Assessor parcel (APN) maps reflect when parcels have been separated or combined for assessment purposes, and are one legal entity. The goal of the GIS parcel fabric data is to distinguish the SFAP and CFAP parcel configurations from the legal configurations, to convey the legal parcel configurations. This workflow is in progress. Please be advised that while we endeavor to restore SFAP and CFAP parcels back to their legal configurations in the primary parcel fabric layer, SFAP and CFAP parcels may be distributed throughout the dataset. Parcels that have been restored to their legal configurations, do not reflect the SFAP or CFAP parcel configurations that correspond to the current property tax delineations. We intend for parcel reports and parcel data to capture when a parcel has been separated or combined for assessment purposes, however in some cases, information may not be available in GIS for the SFAP/CFAP status of a parcel configuration shown. For help or questions regarding a parcel’s SFAP/CFAP status, or property survey data, please visit Napa County’s Surveying Services or Property Mapping Information. For more information you can visit our website: When a Parcel is Not a Parcel | Napa County, CA
We are also including a tabular version that’s slightly more comprehensive (would include anything that didn’t join to the parcel basefile due to lot alterations or resubdivisions since 2023 and/or due to parcels comprised of condos). This Excel file can be downloaded HERE, and does not contain the latitude and longitude information.Data Dictionary: Attribute Label Definition Source
TAX_ID Unique 26 character property tax identification number Onondaga County Planning
PRINTKEY Abbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot) Onondaga County Planning
ADDRESSNUM Property’s physical street address Onondaga County Planning
ADDRESSNAM Property’s physical street name Onondaga County Planning
LAT Latitude Onondaga County Planning
LONG Longitude Onondaga County Planning
TAX_ID_1 City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping) City of Syracuse - Assessment
SBL Property Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot) City of Syracuse - Assessment
PNUMBR Property Number (10 digit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment
StNum Parcel street number City of Syracuse - Assessment
StName Parcel street name City of Syracuse - Assessment
FullAddress Street number and street name City of Syracuse - Assessment
Zip Parcel zip code City of Syracuse - Assessment
desc_1 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment
desc_2 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment
desc_3 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment
SHAPE_IND
City of Syracuse - Assessment
LUC_parcel New York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htm City of Syracuse - Assessment
LU_parcel New York State property type classification name City of Syracuse - Assessment
LUCat_Old Legacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc. NA
land_av Land assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment
total_av Full assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment
Owner Property owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix) City of Syracuse - Assessment
Add1_OwnPOBox Property owner mailing address (PO Box) City of Syracuse - Assessment
Add2_OwnStAdd Property owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction) City of Syracuse - Assessment
Add3_OwnUnitInfo Property owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment
Add4_OwnCityStateZip Property owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code) City of Syracuse - Assessment
FRONT Front footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feet City of Syracuse - Assessment
DEPTH Actual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet) City of Syracuse - Assessment
ACRES Number of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560) City of Syracuse - Assessment
yr_built Year built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.) City of Syracuse - Assessment
n_ResUnits Number of residential units NA - Calculated field
IPSVacant Is it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement
IPS_Condition Property Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement
NREligible National Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
LPSS Locally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
WTR_ACTIVE Water activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active) City of Syracuse - Water
RNI Is property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
DPW_Quad Geographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments. City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works
TNT_NAME TNT Sector property is located in City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
NHOOD City Neighborhood Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)
NRSA Is property located in Neighborhood Revitilization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
DOCE_Area Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
ZONE_DIST_PREV Former zoning district code Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)
REZONE ReZone designation (adopted June 2023) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
New_CC_DIST Current Common Council District property is located in Onondaga County Board of Elections
CTID_2020 Census Tract ID (2020) U.S. Census Bureau
CTLAB_2020 Census Tract Label (2020) U.S. Census Bureau
CT_2020 Census Tract (2020) U.S. Census Bureau
SpecNhood Is property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)
InPD Is property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)
PDNAME Preservation District name Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)
ELECT_DIST Election district number Onondaga County Board of Elections
CITY_WARD City ward number Onondaga County Board of Elections
COUNTY_LEG Onondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections
NYS_ASSEMB New York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections
NYS_SENATE New York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections
US_CONGR United States Congressional District number Onondaga County Board of Elections
Dataset Contact InformationOrganization: Neighborhood & Business DevelopmentPosition:Data Program ManagerCity:Syracuse, NYE-Mail Address:opendata@syrgov.netPlease note there is a data quality issue in this iteration with the preservation district (“InPD,” “PDNAME”) and special neighborhood historic district (“SpecNhood”) fields erroneously showing null results for all parcels.
http://www.carteretcountync.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4659http://www.carteretcountync.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4659
This data provides the geographic location for parcel boundary lines within the jurisdiction of the Carteret County, NC and is based on recorded surveys and deeds. This dataset is maintained by the Carteret County Mapping/Land Records Division. Data is updated on an as needed basis. The description for each field name in the layer is included below:PIN: first 8 digits of PIN15; this would include the MAPNUM, SUBMAP, and BLOCKMAPNUM: first 4 digits of PIN15BLOCK: two digit block number found on old mylars; also digits number 7 and 8 of the PIN15PDOT: part of the PIN15; digits number 9-12 (before the last 3 digits of the PIN15)MAPNAM: first 6 digits of PIN15 map and submapAll fields above are parts of the PIN15 (primary parcel identifier), which is determined by the location of the centroid of a parcel within the State Plane NC Grid SystemCONDO_: condo unit number and also the last 3 digits of the PIN15MOTHER: if a parcel was split from another parcel, the new parcel number would be considered the child and the original would be considered the parent or motherPRID: old parcel number style based on prior mapping system before NC Grid system mapsPIN15: the primary tax parcel identifierWHAT: acreage calculated within ArcGISDeedDate_2: unused fieldOWNER: tax parcel ownerDBOOK: deed book containing most recent deed to propertyDPAGE: deed page containing most recent deed to propertyDDATE: most recent deed date for propertySALE_PRICE: recorded sale priceLAND_VALUE: value of land on propertySTRUC_VAL: value of structure(s) on propertyOTHER_VAL: other value of the propertyBLT_CONDO: year condo was builtMAIL_APT: property owner mailing address unitMAIL_HOUSE: property owner mailing address house numberMAIL_DIR: property owner mailing address street directionalMAIL_ST: property owner mailing address street nameMAIL_STTYP: property owner mailing address street suffix (e.g. Dr., St. etc.)MAIL_CITY: mailing address cityMAIL_STATE: mailing address stateMAIL_ZI4: mailing address zip +4MAIL_ZI5: mailing address zip codeMAIL_ADD2: mailing address additional part (e.g. P.O. Box)TOWNSHIP: township codeCITY_LIMIT: the city limit that the parcel is withinNBHD: Neighborhood codeFIRE_DIST: fire district that the parcel is withinRESCUE_DST: rescue district that the parcel is withinLEGAL_DSC: legal descriptionTOTAL_ACR: total deeded acreageY_BLT_HOUS: year house was builtTOT_SQ_FT: total square footage of structure on propertyROLL_TYPE: roll type of property (regularly taxed property or tax-exempt)BATHROOMS: number of bathroomsBEDROOMS: number of bedroomsSITE_HOUSE: site address house numberSITE_ST: site address street nameSITE_DIR: site address street directionalSITE_STTYP: site address street suffix (e.g. Dr., St., etc.)SITE_APTNO: site address unitSITE_CITY: site address city/communityExpr1: old deed date field; not usedTotal_EMV: total estimated tax valueUse_Val: plat book containing survey of propertyDef_Val: plat page containing survey of propertyMAIL_APT_N: mailing address unit (not used)CONDO_SQFT: condo unit square footageDistrict: district code (indicates the community)CONDO_NUM: condo number of floorsTowns_Desc: township nameTrue_City: true city Use_code: land use codeUse_desc: land use descriptionPerm_N1: permit #1Perm_N2: permit #2Perm_Ty1: permit #1 typePerm_Ty2: permit #2 typePerm_De1: permit #1 descriptionPerm_De2: permit #2 descriptionPerm_Is1: permit #1 issue datePerm_Is2: permit #2 issue dateSCH_Dat1: permit #1 scheduled completion dateSCH_Dat2: permit #2 scheduled completion dateACTL_DA1: permit #1 actual completion date ACTL_DA2: permit #2 actual completion dateFondTyp1: foundation type 1FondDes1: foundation type 1 descriptionFondTyp2: foundation type 2FondDes2: foundation type 2 descriptionExWllTyp1: exterior wall type 1ExWllDes1: exterior wall type 1 descriptionExWllTyp2: exterior wall type 2ExWllDes2: exterior wall type 2 descriptionHeatTyp1: heating type 1HeatDes1: heating type 1 descriptionHeatTyp2: heating type 2HeatDes2: heating type 2 descriptionFlrTyp1: flooring type 1FlrDes1: flooring type 1 descriptionFlrTyp2: flooring type 2FlrDes2: flooring type 2 descriptionCondCod: condition codeCondDes: condition descriptionRStrTyp1: roof structure type 1RStrDes: roof structure type 1 descriptionRStrTyp2: roof structure type 2RStrDes2: roof structure type 2 descriptionRCovTyp1: roof covering type 1RCovDes1: roof covering type 1 descriptionRCovTyp2: roof covering type 2RCovDes2: roof covering type 2 descriptionaicuz: stands for "Air Installation Compatible Use Zone"; planning zones pertaining to military air bases and the surrounding real estateRisk_level: risk level for military air plane accident potential within the AICUZ zonesNoise_lvl: noise level zones surrounding military air basesHtdSqFt: heated square footage of structure on the property
https://data.syr.gov/pages/termsofusehttps://data.syr.gov/pages/termsofuse
We are also including tabular version that’s slightly more comprehensive (would include anything that didn’t join to the parcel basefile due to lot alterations or resubdivisions since 2023 and/or due to parcels comprised of condos). There are approximately 200 records that don't join to the spatial parcel file and some additional that are null in the spatial parcel file, altogether around 560 total. This Excel file can be downloaded HERE, and does not contain the latitude and longitude information.Data Dictionary:Attribute LabelDefinitionSourceTAX_IDUnique 26 character property tax identification numberOnondaga County PlanningPRINTKEYAbbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot)Onondaga County PlanningADDRESSNUMProperty’s physical street addressOnondaga County PlanningADDRESSNAMProperty’s physical street nameOnondaga County PlanningTAX_ID_1City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping)City of Syracuse - AssessmentSBLProperty Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot)City of Syracuse - AssessmentPNUMBRProperty Number (10 digit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentStNumParcel street numberCity of Syracuse - AssessmentStNameParcel street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentFullAddressStreet number and street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentZipParcel zip codeCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_1Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_2Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_3Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - AssessmentSHAPE_IND City of Syracuse - AssessmentLUC_parcelNew York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htmCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLU_parcelNew York State property type classification nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLUCat_OldLegacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc.NAland_avLand assessed valueCity of Syracuse - Assessmenttotal_avFull assessed valueCity of Syracuse - AssessmentOwnerProperty owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd1_OwnPOBoxProperty owner mailing address (PO Box)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd2_OwnStAddProperty owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd3_OwnUnitInfoProperty owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd4_OwnCityStateZipProperty owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code)City of Syracuse - AssessmentFRONTFront footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feetCity of Syracuse - AssessmentDEPTHActual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet)City of Syracuse - AssessmentACRESNumber of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560)City of Syracuse - Assessmentyr_builtYear built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.)City of Syracuse - Assessmentn_ResUnitsNumber of residential unitsNA - Calculated fieldIPSVacantIs it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No)City of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementIPS_ConditionProperty Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best)City of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementNREligibleNational Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentLPSSLocally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentWTR_ACTIVEWater activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active)City of Syracuse - WaterRNIIs property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDPW_QuadGeographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments.City of Syracuse - Department of Public WorksTNT_NAMETNT Sector property is located inCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNHOODCity NeighborhoodSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)NRSAIs property located in Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDOCE_AreaGeographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement casesCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentZONE_DIST_PREVFormer zoning district codeSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)REZONEReZone designation (adopted June 2023)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNew_CC_DISTCurrent Common Council District property is located inOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCTID_2020Census Tract ID (2020)U.S. Census BureauCTLAB_2020Census Tract Label (2020)U.S. Census BureauCT_2020Census Tract (2020)U.S. Census BureauSpecNhoodIs property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)InPDIs property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)PDNAMEPreservation District nameSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)ELECT_DISTElection district numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCITY_WARDCity ward numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCOUNTY_LEGOnondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_ASSEMBNew York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_SENATENew York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsUS_CONGRUnited States Congressional District numberOnondaga County Board of Elections
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Webmap of Allegheny municipalities and parcel data. Zoom for a clickable parcel map with owner name, property photograph, and link to the County Real Estate website for property sales information.
https://data.syr.gov/pages/termsofusehttps://data.syr.gov/pages/termsofuse
Data Dictionary: Attribute Label Definition Source
TAX_ID Unique 26 character property tax identification number Onondaga County Planning
SHAPE_Leng Shape length NA - Calculated field
SHAPE_Area Shape area NA - Calculated field
PRINTKEY Abbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot) Onondaga County Planning
ADDRESSNUM Property’s physical street address Onondaga County Planning
ADDRESSNAM Property’s physical street name Onondaga County Planning
SBL Property Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot) City of Syracuse - Assessment
PNUMBR Property Number (10 digit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment
StNum Parcel street number City of Syracuse - Assessment
StName Parcel street name City of Syracuse - Assessment
FullAddress Street number and street name City of Syracuse - Assessment
Zip Parcel zip code City of Syracuse - Assessment
desc_1 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment
desc_2 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment
desc_3 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment
SHAPE_IND
City of Syracuse - Assessment
LUC_parcel New York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htm City of Syracuse - Assessment
LU_parcel New York State property type classification name City of Syracuse - Assessment
LUCat_Old Legacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc. NA
land_av Land assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment
total_av Full assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment
Owner Property owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix) City of Syracuse - Assessment
OwnerFullAddress Property owner assessed address (street number, street name, street direction [or PO Box], unit name, unit number, city, state or country, zip code) City of Syracuse - Assessment
Add1_OwnPOBox Property owner mailing address (PO Box) City of Syracuse - Assessment
Add2_OwnStAdd Property owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction) City of Syracuse - Assessment
Add3_OwnUnitInfo Property owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment
Add4_OwnCityStateZip Property owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code) City of Syracuse - Assessment
FRONT Front footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feet City of Syracuse - Assessment
DEPTH Actual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet) City of Syracuse - Assessment
ACRES Number of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560) City of Syracuse - Assessment
yr_built Year built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.) City of Syracuse - Assessment
n_ResUnits Number of residential units NA - Calculated field
IPSVacant Is it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement
IPS_Condition Property Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement
NREligible National Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
LPSS Locally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
WTR_ACTIVE Water activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active) City of Syracuse - Water
RNI Is property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
DPW_Quad Geographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments. City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works
DPW_Sani DPW sanitation trash and recycling pick-up day (trash service weekly, recycling biweekly) City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works
DPW_Recycle DPW recycling biweekly pick-up group (either Week A or Week B), collection occurs every other week City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works
TNT_NAME TNT Sector property is located in City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
NHOOD City Neighborhood Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)
NRSA Is property located in Neighborhood Revitilization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
DOCE_Insp1 Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for housing inspectors City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement
DOCE_Insp2 Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for building inspectors City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement
DOCE_Permit Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for permit inspectors City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement
DOCE_Comm Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases for commercial and electrical inspectors City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement
FIRE_DIST Fire engine districts City of Syracuse - Fire Department
ZONE_DIST_PREV Former zoning district code Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)
REZONE ReZone designation (adopted June 2023, last updated 2024-12-17) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development
CC_DIST Current Common Council District property is located in Onondaga County Board of Elections
CTID_2020 Census Tract ID (2020) U.S. Census Bureau
CTLAB_2020 Census Tract Label (2020) U.S. Census Bureau
CT_2020 Census Tract (2020) U.S. Census Bureau
SpecNhood Is property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)
InPD Is property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)
PDNAME Preservation District name Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)
ELECT_DIST Election district number Onondaga County Board of Elections
CITY_WARD City ward number Onondaga County Board of Elections
COUNTY_LEG Onondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2024) Onondaga County Board of Elections
NYS_ASSEMB New York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2024) Onondaga County Board of Elections
NYS_SENATE New York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2024) Onondaga County Board of Elections
US_CONGR United States Congressional District number Onondaga County Board of Elections
See full Data Guide here. Connecticut Parcels for Protected Open Space Mapping is a polygon feature-based layer that includes basic parcel-level information for some towns in Connecticut. This 2009 parcel layer includes information provided by individual municipalities. These parcel data are incomplete and out of date. The accuracy, currency and completeness of the data reflect the content of the data at the time DEEP acquired the data from the individual municipalities. Attribute information is comprised of values such as town name and map lot block number. These data are not updated by CT DEEP and should only be used as a general reference. Critical decisions involving parcel-level information should be based on more recently acquired information from the respective municipalities. These parcels are not to be considered legal boundaries such as boundaries determined from certain classified survey maps or deed descriptions. Parcel boundaries shown in this layer are based on information from municipalities used for property tax purposes. Largely due to differences in horizontal accuracy among various data layers, do not expect these parcel boundaries to line up exactly with or be properly postioned relative to features shown on other layers available from CT DEEP such as scanned USGS topography quadrangle maps, roads, hydrography, town boundaries, and even orthophotograpy. The data in the parcel layer was obtained from individual Connecticut municipalities. An effort was made to collect data once from each municipality. The data acquisition date for each set of municipally-supplied parcel data was not recorded and CT DEEP does not keep this information up-to-date. Consequently, these data are out-of-date, incomplete and do not reflect the current state of property ownership in these municipalities. These parcels are not to be considered legal boundaries such as boundaries determined from certain classified survey maps or deed descriptions. Parcel boundaries shown in this layer are based on information from municipalities used for property tax purposes. Parcel boundaries and attribute information have not been updated in this layer since the time the information was originally acquired by CT DEEP. For example, property boundaries are incorrect where subdivisions have occurred. Also, field attribute values are populated only if the information was supplied to CT DEEP. For example, parcels in some towns lack location (street name) information or possibly map lot block values. Therefore, field attributes are inconsistent, may include gaps, and do not represent complete sets of values among all towns. They should not be compared and analyzed across towns. It is emphasized that critical decisions involving parcel-level information be based on more recently obtained information from the respective municipalities. These data are only suitable for general reference purposes. Be cautious when using these data. Many Connecticut municipalities provide access to more up-to-date and more detailed property ownership information on the Internet. This dataset includes parcel information for the following towns: Andover, Ansonia, Ashford, Avon, Beacon Falls, Berlin, Bethany, Bethel, Bethlehem, Bloomfield, Bolton, Branford, Bridgewater, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Canaan, Canterbury, Canton, Chaplin, Cheshire, Chester, Clinton, Colchester, Colebrook, Columbia, Cornwall, Coventry, Cromwell, Danbury, Darien, Deep River, Derby, East Granby, East Haddam, East Hampton, East Hartford, East Lyme, East Windsor, Eastford, Ellington, Enfield, Essex, Farmington, Franklin, Glastonbury, Granby, Greenwich, Griswold, Groton, Guilford, Haddam, Hamden, Hartford, Hebron, Kent, Killingly, Killingworth, Lebanon, Ledyard, Lisbon, Litchfield, Lyme, Madison, Manchester, Mansfield, Marlborough, Meriden, Middlebury, Middlefield, Middletown, Milford,
Parcels and property data maintained and provided by Lee County Property Appraiser. This dataset includes condominium units. Property attribute data joined to parcel GIS layer by Lee County Government GIS.Projected coordinate system name: NAD_1983_StatePlane_Florida_West_FIPS_0902_FeetGeographic coordinate system name: GCS_North_American_1983
Name
Type
Length
Description
STRAP
String
25
17-digit Property ID (Section, Township, Range, Area, Block, Lot)
BLOCK
String
10
5-digit portion of STRAP (positions 9-13)
LOT
String
8
Last 4-digits of STRAP
FOLIOID
Double
8
Unique Property ID
MAINTDATE
Date
8
Date LeePA staff updated record
MAINTWHO
String
20
LeePA staff who updated record
UPDATED
Date
8
Data compilation date
HIDE_STRAP
String
1
Confidential parcel ownership
TRSPARCEL
String
17
Parcel ID sorted by Township, Range & Section
DORCODE
String
2
Department of Revenue property classification code
CONDOTYPE
String
1
Type of condominium: C (commercial) or R (residential)
UNITOFMEAS
String
2
Type of Unit of Measure (ex: AC=acre, LT=lot, FF=frontage in feet)
NUMUNITS
Double
8
Number of Land Units (units defined in UNITOFMEAS)
FRONTAGE
Integer
4
Road Frontage in Feet
DEPTH
Integer
4
Property Depth in Feet
GISACRES
Double
8
Total Computed Acres from GIS
TAXINGDIST
String
3
Taxing District of Property
TAXDISTDES
String
60
Taxing District Description
FIREDIST
String
3
Fire District of Property
FIREDISTDE
String
60
Fire District Description
ZONING
String
10
Zoning of Property
ZONINGAREA
String
3
Governing Area for Zoning
LANDUSECOD
SmallInteger
2
Land Use Code
LANDUSEDES
String
60
Land Use Description
LANDISON
String
5
BAY,CANAL,CREEK,GULF,LAKE,RIVER & GOLF
SITEADDR
String
55
Lee County Addressing/E911
SITENUMBER
String
10
Property Location - Street Number
SITESTREET
String
40
Street Name
SITEUNIT
String
5
Unit Number
SITECITY
String
20
City
SITEZIP
String
5
Zip Code
JUST
Double
8
Market Value
ASSESSED
Double
8
Building Value + Land Value
TAXABLE
Double
8
Taxable Value
LAND
Double
8
Land Value
BUILDING
Double
8
Building Value
LXFV
Double
8
Land Extra Feature Value
BXFV
Double
8
Building Extra Feature value
NEWBUILT
Double
8
New Construction Value
AGAMOUNT
Double
8
Agriculture Exemption Value
DISAMOUNT
Double
8
Disability Exemption Value
HISTAMOUNT
Double
8
Historical Exemption Value
HSTDAMOUNT
Double
8
Homestead Exemption Value
SNRAMOUNT
Double
8
Senior Exemption Value
WHLYAMOUNT
Double
8
Wholly Exemption Value
WIDAMOUNT
Double
8
Widow Exemption Value
WIDRAMOUNT
Double
8
Widower Exemption Value
BLDGCOUNT
SmallInteger
2
Total Number of Buildings on Parcel
MINBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Oldest Building Built
MAXBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Newest Building Built
TOTALAREA
Double
8
Total Building Area
HEATEDAREA
Double
8
Total Heated Area
MAXSTORIES
Double
8
Tallest Building on Parcel
BEDROOMS
Integer
4
Total Number of Bedrooms
BATHROOMS
Double
8
Total Number of Bathrooms / Not For Comm
GARAGE
String
1
Garage on Property 'Y'
CARPORT
String
1
Carport on Property 'Y'
POOL
String
1
Pool on Property 'Y'
BOATDOCK
String
1
Boat Dock on Property 'Y'
SEAWALL
String
1
Sea Wall on Property 'Y'
NBLDGCOUNT
SmallInteger
2
Total Number of New Buildings on ParcelTotal Number of New Buildings on Parcel
NMINBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Oldest New Building Built
NMAXBUILTY
SmallInteger
2
Newest New Building Built
NTOTALAREA
Double
8
Total New Building Area
NHEATEDARE
Double
8
Total New Heated Area
NMAXSTORIE
Double
8
Tallest New Building on Parcel
NBEDROOMS
Integer
4
Total Number of New Bedrooms
NBATHROOMS
Double
8
Total Number of New Bathrooms/Not For Comm
NGARAGE
String
1
New Garage on Property 'Y'
NCARPORT
String
1
New Carport on Property 'Y'
NPOOL
String
1
New Pool on Property 'Y'
NBOATDOCK
String
1
New Boat Dock on Property 'Y'
NSEAWALL
String
1
New Sea Wall on Property 'Y'
O_NAME
String
30
Owner Name
O_OTHERS
String
120
Other Owners
O_CAREOF
String
30
In Care Of Line
O_ADDR1
String
30
Owner Mailing Address Line 1
O_ADDR2
String
30
Owner Mailing Address Line 2
O_CITY
String
30
Owner Mailing City
O_STATE
String
2
Owner Mailing State
O_ZIP
String
9
Owner Mailing Zip
O_COUNTRY
String
30
Owner Mailing Country
S_1DATE
Date
8
Most Current Sale Date > $100.00
S_1AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_1VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_1TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_1TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_1OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
S_2DATE
Date
8
Previous Sale Date > $100.00
S_2AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_2VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_2TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_2TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_2OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
S_3DATE
Date
8
Next Previous Sale Date > $100.00
S_3AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_3VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_3TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_3TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_3OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
S_4DATE
Date
8
Next Previous Sale Date > $100.00
S_4AMOUNT
Double
8
Sale Amount
S_4VI
String
1
Sale Vacant or Improved
S_4TC
String
2
Sale Transaction Code
S_4TOC
String
2
Sale Transaction Override Code
S_4OR_NUM
String
13
Original Record (Lee County Clerk)
LEGAL
String
255
Full Legal Description (On Deed)
GARBDIST
String
3
County Garbage Hauling Area
GARBTYPE
String
1
County Garbage Pick-up Type
GARBCOMCAT
String
1
County Garbage Commercial Category
GARBHEADER
String
1
Garbage Header Code
GARBUNITS
Double
8
Number of Garbage Units
CREATEYEAR
Data Dictionary: AttributeLabelDefinitionSourceTAX_IDUnique 26 character property taxOnondaga County PlanningPRINTKEYAbbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot)Onondaga County PlanningEASTGRIDEast grid coordinate of centroid in feetOnondaga County PlanningNORTHGRIDNorth grid coordinate of centroid in feetOnondaga County PlanningTAX_ID_1City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping)City of Syracuse - AssessmentSBLProperty Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot)City of Syracuse - AssessmentPNUMBRProperty Number (10 digit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentStNumParcel street numberCity of Syracuse - AssessmentStNameParcel street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentFullAddressStreet number and street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentZipParcel zip codeCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_1Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_2Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_3Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - AssessmentSHAPE_INDCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLUC_parcelNew York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htmCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLU_parcelNew York State property type classification nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLUCat_OldLegacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc. City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Developmentland_avLand valueCity of Syracuse - Assessmenttotal_avFull valueCity of Syracuse - AssessmentOwnerProperty owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd1_OwnPOProperty owner mailing address (PO Box)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd2_OwnStProperty owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd3_OwnUnProperty owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd4_OwnCiProperty owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code)City of Syracuse - AssessmentFRONTFront footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feetCity of Syracuse - AssessmentDEPTH_1Actual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet)City of Syracuse - AssessmentACRES_1Number of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560)City of Syracuse - Assessmentyr_builtYear builtCity of Syracuse - AssessmentIPSVacantIs it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentIPS_ConditProperty Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNREligibleNational Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentLPSSLocally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentWTR_ACTIVEWater activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active)City of Syracuse - WaterRNIIs property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDPW_QuadGeographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments.City of Syracuse - Department of Public WorksTNT_NAMETNT Sector property is located inCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNHOODCity NeighborhoodCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNRSAIs property located in Neighborhood Revitilization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDOCE_AreaGeographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement casesCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentZONE_DIST_Former zoning district codeCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentREZONEReZone designation (adopted June 2023)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNew_CC_DISTCurrent Common Council District property is located inCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentCTID_2020Census Tract ID (2020)U.S. Census BureauCTLAB_2020Census Tract Label (2020)U.S. Census BureauCT_2020Census Tract (2020)U.S. Census BureauSpecNhoodIs property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentInPDIs property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentPDNAMEPreservation District nameCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentELECT_DISTElection district numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCITY_WARDCity ward numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCOUNTY_LEGOnondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_ASSEMBNew York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_SENATENew York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsUS_CONGRUnited States Congressional District numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsDataset Contact InformationOrganization: Neighborhood & Business DevelopmentPosition:Data Program ManagerCity:Syracuse, NYE-Mail Address:opendata@syrgov.net
Web App. Use the tabs provided to discover information about map features and capabilities. Link to Metadata. A variety of searches can be performed to find the parcel of interest. Use the Query Tool to build searches. Click Apply button at the bottom of the tool.Query by Name (Last First) (e.g. Bond James)Query by Address (e.g. 41 S Central)Query by Locator number (e.g. 21J411046)Search results will be listed under the Results tab. Click on a parcel in the list to zoom to that parcel. Click on the parcel in the map and scroll through the pop-up to see more information about the parcel. Click the ellipse in the Results tab or in the pop-up to view information in a table. Attribute information can be exported to CSV file. Build a custom Filter to select and map properties by opening the Parcels attribute table:1. Click the arrow tab at the bottom middle of the map to expand the attribute table window2. Click on the Parcels tab3. Check off Filter by map extent4. Open Options>Filter5. Build expressions as needed to filter by owner name or other variables6. Select the needed records from the returned list7. Click Zoom to which will zoom to the selected recordsPlease note that as the map zooms out detailed layers, such as the parcel boundaries will not display.In addition to Search capabilities, the following tools are provided:MeasureThe measure tool provides the capabilities to draw a point, line, or polygon on the map and specify the unit of measurement.DrawThe draw tool provides the capabilities to draw a point, line, or polygon on the map as graphics. PrintThe print tool exports the map to either a PDF or image file. Click Settings button to configure map or remove legend.Map navigation using mouse and keyboard:Drag to panSHIFT + CTRL + Drag to zoom outMouse Scroll Forward to zoom inMouse Scroll Backward to zoom outUse Arrow keys to pan+ key to zoom in a level- key to zoom out a levelDouble Click to Zoom inFAQsHow to select a parcel: Click on a parcel in the map, or use Query Tool to search for parcel by owner, address or parcel id.How to select more than one parcel: Go to Select Tool and choose options on Select button.How to clear selected parcel(s): Go to Select Tool and click Clear.
Please note: this data is live (updated nightly) to reflect the latest changes in the City's systems of record.Overview of the Data:This dataset is a polygon feature layer with the boundaries of all tax parcels owned by the City of Rochester. This includes all public parks, and municipal buildings, as well as vacant land and structures currently owned by the City. The data includes fields with features about each property including property type, date of sale, land value, dimensions, and more.About City Owned Properties:The City's real estate inventory is managed by the Division of Real Estate in the Department of Neighborhood and Business Development. Properties like municipal buildings and parks are expected to be in long term ownership of the City. Properties such as vacant land and vacant structures are ones the City is actively seeking to reposition for redevelopment to increase the City's tax base and economic activity. The City acquires many of these properties through the tax foreclosure auction process when no private entity bids the minimum bid. Some of these properties stay in the City's ownership for years, while others are quickly sold to development partners. For more information please visit the City's webpage for the Division of Real Estate: https://www.cityofrochester.gov/realestate/Data Dictionary: SBL: The twenty-digit unique identifier assigned to a tax parcel. PRINTKEY: A unique identifier for a tax parcel, typically in the format of “Tax map section – Block – Lot". Street Number: The street number where the tax parcel is located. Street Name: The street name where the tax parcel is located. NAME: The street number and street name for the tax parcel. City: The city where the tax parcel is located. Property Class Code: The standardized code to identify the type and/or use of the tax parcel. For a full list of codes, view the NYS Real Property System (RPS) property classification codes guide. Property Class: The name of the property class associated with the property class code. Property Type: The type of property associated with the property class code. There are nine different types of property according to RPS: 100: Agricultural 200: Residential 300: Vacant Land 400: Commercial 500: Recreation & Entertainment 600: Community Services 700: Industrial 800: Public Services 900: Wild, forested, conservation lands and public parks First Owner Name: The name of the property owner of the vacant tax parcel. If there are multiple owners, then the first one is displayed. Postal Address: The USPS postal address for the vacant landowner. Postal City: The USPS postal city, state, and zip code for the vacant landowner. Lot Frontage: The length (in feet) of how wide the lot is across the street. Lot Depth: The length (in feet) of how far the lot goes back from the street. Stated Area: The area of the vacant tax parcel. Current Land Value: The current value (in USD) of the tax parcel. Current Total Assessed Value: The current value (in USD) assigned by a tax assessor, which takes into consideration both the land value, buildings on the land, etc. Current Taxable Value: The amount (in USD) of the assessed value that can be taxed. Tentative Land Value: The current value (in USD) of the land on the tax parcel, subject to change based on appeals, reassessments, and public review. Tentative Total Assessed Value: The preliminary estimate (in USD) of the tax parcel’s assessed value, which includes tentative land value and tentative improvement value. Tentative Taxable Value: The preliminary estimate (in USD) of the tax parcel’s value used to calculate property taxes. Sale Date: The date (MM/DD/YYYY) of when the vacant tax parcel was sold. Sale Price: The price (in USD) of what the vacant tax parcel was sold for. Book: The record book that the property deed or sale is recorded in. Page: The page in the record book where the property deed or sale is recorded in. Deed Type: The type of deed associated with the vacant tax parcel sale. RESCOM: Notes whether the vacant tax parcel is zoned for residential or commercial use. R: Residential C: Commercial BISZONING: Notes the zoning district the vacant tax parcel is in. For more information on zoning, visit the City’s Zoning District map. OWNERSHIPCODE: Code to note type of ownership (if applicable). Number of Residential Units: Notes how many residential units are available on the tax parcel (if applicable). LOW_STREET_NUM: The street number of the vacant tax parcel. HIGH_STREET_NUM: The street number of the vacant tax parcel. GISEXTDATE: The date and time when the data was last updated. SALE_DATE_datefield: The recorded date of sale of the vacant tax parcel (if available). Source: This data comes from the department of Neighborhood and Business Development, Bureau of Real Estate.
This data is the source of all current parcel identification numbers and the approximate location of the parcel boundaries. These features were created through various means including conversion from mylar maps, heads up digitizing and coordinate geometry. The graphic depiction of the parcel boundaries in this layer is a derivative of the recorded documents that contain the official boundary of each parcel. To determine the accurate definition of any given parcel go to the recorded document housed in the official court recorded system, CPAN.
This layer contains cadastral information for Fairfax County, Virginia. This includes, but is not limited to the portrayal of polygonal features (such as parcels, subdivisions and easements), text (parcel numbers, street names and addresses), and symbols (parkland, schools, "double circles", etc.). This layer was initially developed as a digital copy of the ink-on-mylar property maps maintained by the County since the early 1960's.
For more information go to the Geospatial Property Data Guide.
Contact: Fairfax County Department of Information Technology GIS Division
Data Accessibility: Publicly Available
Update Frequency: Daily
Last Revision Date: 1/1/2000
Creation Date: 1/1/2000
Feature Dataset Name: GISMGR.PARCELS
Layer Name: GISMGR.PARCELS
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Update information can be found within the layer’s attributes and in a table on the Utah Parcel Data webpage under LIR Parcels.In Spring of 2016, the Land Information Records work group, an informal committee organized by the Governor’s Office of Management and Budget’s State Planning Coordinator, produced recommendations for expanding the sharing of GIS-based parcel information. Participants in the LIR work group included representatives from county, regional, and state government, including the Utah Association of Counties (County Assessors and County Recorders), Wasatch Front Regional Council, Mountainland and Bear River AOGs, Utah League of Cities and Towns, UDOT, DNR, AGRC, the Division of Emergency Management, Blue Stakes, economic developers, and academic researchers. The LIR work group’s recommendations set the stage for voluntary sharing of additional objective/quantitative parcel GIS data, primarily around tax assessment-related information. Specifically the recommendations document establishes objectives, principles (including the role of local and state government), data content items, expected users, and a general process for data aggregation and publishing. An important realization made by the group was that ‘parcel data’ or ‘parcel record’ products have a different meaning to different users and data stewards. The LIR group focused, specifically, on defining a data sharing recommendation around a tax year parcel GIS data product, aligned with the finalization of the property tax roll by County Assessors on May 22nd of each year. The LIR recommendations do not impact the periodic sharing of basic parcel GIS data (boundary, ID, address) from the County Recorders to AGRC per 63F-1-506 (3.b.vi). Both the tax year parcel and the basic parcel GIS layers are designed for general purpose uses, and are not substitutes for researching and obtaining the most current, legal land records information on file in County records. This document, below, proposes a schedule, guidelines, and process for assembling county parcel and assessment data into an annual, statewide tax parcel GIS layer. gis.utah.gov/data/sgid-cadastre/ It is hoped that this new expanded parcel GIS layer will be put to immediate use supporting the best possible outcomes in public safety, economic development, transportation, planning, and the provision of public services. Another aim of the work group was to improve the usability of the data, through development of content guidelines and consistent metadata documentation, and the efficiency with which the data sharing is distributed.GIS Layer Boundary Geometry:GIS Format Data Files: Ideally, Tax Year Parcel data should be provided in a shapefile (please include the .shp, .shx, .dbf, .prj, and .xml component files) or file geodatabase format. An empty shapefile and file geodatabase schema are available for download at:At the request of a county, AGRC will provide technical assistance to counties to extract, transform, and load parcel and assessment information into the GIS layer format.Geographic Coverage: Tax year parcel polygons should cover the area of each county for which assessment information is created and digital parcels are available. Full coverage may not be available yet for each county. The county may provide parcels that have been adjusted to remove gaps and overlaps for administrative tax purposes or parcels that retain these expected discrepancies that take their source from the legally described boundary or the process of digital conversion. The diversity of topological approaches will be noted in the metadata.One Tax Parcel Record Per Unique Tax Notice: Some counties produce an annual tax year parcel GIS layer with one parcel polygon per tax notice. In some cases, adjacent parcel polygons that compose a single taxed property must be merged into a single polygon. This is the goal for the statewide layer but may not be possible in all counties. AGRC will provide technical support to counties, where needed, to merge GIS parcel boundaries into the best format to match with the annual assessment information.Standard Coordinate System: Parcels will be loaded into Utah’s statewide coordinate system, Universal Transverse Mercator coordinates (NAD83, Zone 12 North). However, boundaries stored in other industry standard coordinate systems will be accepted if they are both defined within the data file(s) and documented in the metadata (see below).Descriptive Attributes:Database Field/Column Definitions: The table below indicates the field names and definitions for attributes requested for each Tax Parcel Polygon record.FIELD NAME FIELD TYPE LENGTH DESCRIPTION EXAMPLE SHAPE (expected) Geometry n/a The boundary of an individual parcel or merged parcels that corresponds with a single county tax notice ex. polygon boundary in UTM NAD83 Zone 12 N or other industry standard coordinates including state plane systemsCOUNTY_NAME Text 20 - County name including spaces ex. BOX ELDERCOUNTY_ID (expected) Text 2 - County ID Number ex. Beaver = 1, Box Elder = 2, Cache = 3,..., Weber = 29ASSESSOR_SRC (expected) Text 100 - Website URL, will be to County Assessor in most all cases ex. webercounty.org/assessorBOUNDARY_SRC (expected) Text 100 - Website URL, will be to County Recorder in most all cases ex. webercounty.org/recorderDISCLAIMER (added by State) Text 50 - Disclaimer URL ex. gis.utah.gov...CURRENT_ASOF (expected) Date - Parcels current as of date ex. 01/01/2016PARCEL_ID (expected) Text 50 - County designated Unique ID number for individual parcels ex. 15034520070000PARCEL_ADD (expected, where available) Text 100 - Parcel’s street address location. Usually the address at recordation ex. 810 S 900 E #304 (example for a condo)TAXEXEMPT_TYPE (expected) Text 100 - Primary category of granted tax exemption ex. None, Religious, Government, Agriculture, Conservation Easement, Other Open Space, OtherTAX_DISTRICT (expected, where applicable) Text 10 - The coding the county uses to identify a unique combination of property tax levying entities ex. 17ATOTAL_MKT_VALUE (expected) Decimal - Total market value of parcel's land, structures, and other improvements as determined by the Assessor for the most current tax year ex. 332000LAND _MKT_VALUE (expected) Decimal - The market value of the parcel's land as determined by the Assessor for the most current tax year ex. 80600PARCEL_ACRES (expected) Decimal - Parcel size in acres ex. 20.360PROP_CLASS (expected) Text 100 - Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Mixed, Agricultural, Vacant, Open Space, Other ex. ResidentialPRIMARY_RES (expected) Text 1 - Is the property a primary residence(s): Y'(es), 'N'(o), or 'U'(nknown) ex. YHOUSING_CNT (expected, where applicable) Text 10 - Number of housing units, can be single number or range like '5-10' ex. 1SUBDIV_NAME (optional) Text 100 - Subdivision name if applicable ex. Highland Manor SubdivisionBLDG_SQFT (expected, where applicable) Integer - Square footage of primary bldg(s) ex. 2816BLDG_SQFT_INFO (expected, where applicable) Text 100 - Note for how building square footage is counted by the County ex. Only finished above and below grade areas are counted.FLOORS_CNT (expected, where applicable) Decimal - Number of floors as reported in county records ex. 2FLOORS_INFO (expected, where applicable) Text 100 - Note for how floors are counted by the County ex. Only above grade floors are countedBUILT_YR (expected, where applicable) Short - Estimated year of initial construction of primary buildings ex. 1968EFFBUILT_YR (optional, where applicable) Short - The 'effective' year built' of primary buildings that factors in updates after construction ex. 1980CONST_MATERIAL (optional, where applicable) Text 100 - Construction Material Types, Values for this field are expected to vary greatly by county ex. Wood Frame, Brick, etc Contact: Sean Fernandez, Cadastral Manager (email: sfernandez@utah.gov; office phone: 801-209-9359)
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Update information can be found within the layer’s attributes and in a table on the Utah Parcel Data webpage under LIR Parcels.In Spring of 2016, the Land Information Records work group, an informal committee organized by the Governor’s Office of Management and Budget’s State Planning Coordinator, produced recommendations for expanding the sharing of GIS-based parcel information. Participants in the LIR work group included representatives from county, regional, and state government, including the Utah Association of Counties (County Assessors and County Recorders), Wasatch Front Regional Council, Mountainland and Bear River AOGs, Utah League of Cities and Towns, UDOT, DNR, AGRC, the Division of Emergency Management, Blue Stakes, economic developers, and academic researchers. The LIR work group’s recommendations set the stage for voluntary sharing of additional objective/quantitative parcel GIS data, primarily around tax assessment-related information. Specifically the recommendations document establishes objectives, principles (including the role of local and state government), data content items, expected users, and a general process for data aggregation and publishing. An important realization made by the group was that ‘parcel data’ or ‘parcel record’ products have a different meaning to different users and data stewards. The LIR group focused, specifically, on defining a data sharing recommendation around a tax year parcel GIS data product, aligned with the finalization of the property tax roll by County Assessors on May 22nd of each year. The LIR recommendations do not impact the periodic sharing of basic parcel GIS data (boundary, ID, address) from the County Recorders to AGRC per 63F-1-506 (3.b.vi). Both the tax year parcel and the basic parcel GIS layers are designed for general purpose uses, and are not substitutes for researching and obtaining the most current, legal land records information on file in County records. This document, below, proposes a schedule, guidelines, and process for assembling county parcel and assessment data into an annual, statewide tax parcel GIS layer. gis.utah.gov/data/sgid-cadastre/It is hoped that this new expanded parcel GIS layer will be put to immediate use supporting the best possible outcomes in public safety, economic development, transportation, planning, and the provision of public services. Another aim of the work group was to improve the usability of the data, through development of content guidelines and consistent metadata documentation, and the efficiency with which the data sharing is distributed.GIS Layer Boundary Geometry:GIS Format Data Files: Ideally, Tax Year Parcel data should be provided in a shapefile (please include the .shp, .shx, .dbf, .prj, and .xml component files) or file geodatabase format. An empty shapefile and file geodatabase schema are available for download at:At the request of a county, AGRC will provide technical assistance to counties to extract, transform, and load parcel and assessment information into the GIS layer format.Geographic Coverage: Tax year parcel polygons should cover the area of each county for which assessment information is created and digital parcels are available. Full coverage may not be available yet for each county. The county may provide parcels that have been adjusted to remove gaps and overlaps for administrative tax purposes or parcels that retain these expected discrepancies that take their source from the legally described boundary or the process of digital conversion. The diversity of topological approaches will be noted in the metadata.One Tax Parcel Record Per Unique Tax Notice: Some counties produce an annual tax year parcel GIS layer with one parcel polygon per tax notice. In some cases, adjacent parcel polygons that compose a single taxed property must be merged into a single polygon. This is the goal for the statewide layer but may not be possible in all counties. AGRC will provide technical support to counties, where needed, to merge GIS parcel boundaries into the best format to match with the annual assessment information.Standard Coordinate System: Parcels will be loaded into Utah’s statewide coordinate system, Universal Transverse Mercator coordinates (NAD83, Zone 12 North). However, boundaries stored in other industry standard coordinate systems will be accepted if they are both defined within the data file(s) and documented in the metadata (see below).Descriptive Attributes:Database Field/Column Definitions: The table below indicates the field names and definitions for attributes requested for each Tax Parcel Polygon record.FIELD NAME FIELD TYPE LENGTH DESCRIPTION EXAMPLE SHAPE (expected) Geometry n/a The boundary of an individual parcel or merged parcels that corresponds with a single county tax notice ex. polygon boundary in UTM NAD83 Zone 12 N or other industry standard coordinates including state plane systemsCOUNTY_NAME Text 20 - County name including spaces ex. BOX ELDERCOUNTY_ID (expected) Text 2 - County ID Number ex. Beaver = 1, Box Elder = 2, Cache = 3,..., Weber = 29ASSESSOR_SRC (expected) Text 100 - Website URL, will be to County Assessor in most all cases ex. webercounty.org/assessorBOUNDARY_SRC (expected) Text 100 - Website URL, will be to County Recorder in most all cases ex. webercounty.org/recorderDISCLAIMER (added by State) Text 50 - Disclaimer URL ex. gis.utah.gov...CURRENT_ASOF (expected) Date - Parcels current as of date ex. 01/01/2016PARCEL_ID (expected) Text 50 - County designated Unique ID number for individual parcels ex. 15034520070000PARCEL_ADD (expected, where available) Text 100 - Parcel’s street address location. Usually the address at recordation ex. 810 S 900 E #304 (example for a condo)TAXEXEMPT_TYPE (expected) Text 100 - Primary category of granted tax exemption ex. None, Religious, Government, Agriculture, Conservation Easement, Other Open Space, OtherTAX_DISTRICT (expected, where applicable) Text 10 - The coding the county uses to identify a unique combination of property tax levying entities ex. 17ATOTAL_MKT_VALUE (expected) Decimal - Total market value of parcel's land, structures, and other improvements as determined by the Assessor for the most current tax year ex. 332000LAND _MKT_VALUE (expected) Decimal - The market value of the parcel's land as determined by the Assessor for the most current tax year ex. 80600PARCEL_ACRES (expected) Decimal - Parcel size in acres ex. 20.360PROP_CLASS (expected) Text 100 - Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Mixed, Agricultural, Vacant, Open Space, Other ex. ResidentialPRIMARY_RES (expected) Text 1 - Is the property a primary residence(s): Y'(es), 'N'(o), or 'U'(nknown) ex. YHOUSING_CNT (expected, where applicable) Text 10 - Number of housing units, can be single number or range like '5-10' ex. 1SUBDIV_NAME (optional) Text 100 - Subdivision name if applicable ex. Highland Manor SubdivisionBLDG_SQFT (expected, where applicable) Integer - Square footage of primary bldg(s) ex. 2816BLDG_SQFT_INFO (expected, where applicable) Text 100 - Note for how building square footage is counted by the County ex. Only finished above and below grade areas are counted.FLOORS_CNT (expected, where applicable) Decimal - Number of floors as reported in county records ex. 2FLOORS_INFO (expected, where applicable) Text 100 - Note for how floors are counted by the County ex. Only above grade floors are countedBUILT_YR (expected, where applicable) Short - Estimated year of initial construction of primary buildings ex. 1968EFFBUILT_YR (optional, where applicable) Short - The 'effective' year built' of primary buildings that factors in updates after construction ex. 1980CONST_MATERIAL (optional, where applicable) Text 100 - Construction Material Types, Values for this field are expected to vary greatly by county ex. Wood Frame, Brick, etc Contact: Sean Fernandez, Cadastral Manager (email: sfernandez@utah.gov; office phone: 801-209-9359)
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
An area depicting ownership parcels of the surface estate. Each surface ownership parcel is tied to a particular legal transaction. The same individual or organization may currently own many parcels that may or may not have been acquired through the same legal transaction. Therefore, they are captured as separate entities rather than merged together. This is in contrast to Basic Ownership, in which the surface ownership parcels having the same owner are merged together. Basic Ownership provides the general user with the Forest Service versus non-Forest Service view of land ownership within National Forest boundaries. Surface Ownership provides the land status user with a current snapshot of ownership within National Forest boundaries. MetadataThis record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: ISO-19139 metadata ArcGIS Hub Dataset ArcGIS GeoService CSV Shapefile GeoJSON KML For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.
Dataset SummaryPlease note: this data is live (updated nightly) to reflect the latest changes in the City's systems of record.About this data:The operational purpose of the vacant land dataset is to facilitate the tracking and mapping of vacant land for the purposes of promoting redevelopment of lots to increase the City's tax base and spur increased economic activity. These properties are both City owned and privately owned. The vast majority of vacant lots are the result of a demolition of a structure that once stood on the property. Vacant lots are noted in the official tax parcel assessment records with a class code beginning with 3, which denotes the category vacant land.Related Resources:For a searchable interactive mapping application, please visit the City of Rochester's Property Information explorer tool. For further information about the city's property tax assessments, please contact the City of Rochester Assessment Bureau. To access the City's zoning code, please click here.Data Dictionary: SBL: The twenty-digit unique identifier assigned to a tax parcel. PRINTKEY: A unique identifier for a tax parcel, typically in the format of “Tax map section – Block – Lot". Street Number: The street number where the tax parcel is located. Street Name: The street name where the tax parcel is located. NAME: The street number and street name for the tax parcel. City: The city where the tax parcel is located. Property Class Code: The standardized code to identify the type and/or use of the tax parcel. For a full list of codes, view the NYS Real Property System (RPS) property classification codes guide. Property Class: The name of the property class associated with the property class code. Property Type: The type of property associated with the property class code. There are nine different types of property according to RPS: 100: Agricultural 200: Residential 300: Vacant Land 400: Commercial 500: Recreation & Entertainment 600: Community Services 700: Industrial 800: Public Services 900: Wild, forested, conservation lands and public parks First Owner Name: The name of the property owner of the vacant tax parcel. If there are multiple owners, then the first one is displayed. Postal Address: The USPS postal address for the vacant landowner. Postal City: The USPS postal city, state, and zip code for the vacant landowner. Lot Frontage: The length (in feet) of how wide the lot is across the street. Lot Depth: The length (in feet) of how far the lot goes back from the street. Stated Area: The area of the vacant tax parcel. Current Land Value: The current value (in USD) of the tax parcel. Current Total Assessed Value: The current value (in USD) assigned by a tax assessor, which takes into consideration both the land value, buildings on the land, etc. Current Taxable Value: The amount (in USD) of the assessed value that can be taxed. Tentative Land Value: The current value (in USD) of the land on the tax parcel, subject to change based on appeals, reassessments, and public review. Tentative Total Assessed Value: The preliminary estimate (in USD) of the tax parcel’s assessed value, which includes tentative land value and tentative improvement value. Tentative Taxable Value: The preliminary estimate (in USD) of the tax parcel’s value used to calculate property taxes. Sale Date: The date (MM/DD/YYYY) of when the vacant tax parcel was sold. Sale Price: The price (in USD) of what the vacant tax parcel was sold for. Book: The record book that the property deed or sale is recorded in. Page: The page in the record book where the property deed or sale is recorded in. Deed Type: The type of deed associated with the vacant tax parcel sale. RESCOM: Notes whether the vacant tax parcel is zoned for residential or commercial use. R: Residential C: Commercial BISZONING: Notes the zoning district the vacant tax parcel is in. For more information on zoning, visit the City’s Zoning District map. OWNERSHIPCODE: Code to note type of ownership (if applicable). Number of Residential Units: Notes how many residential units are available on the tax parcel (if applicable). LOW_STREET_NUM: The street number of the vacant tax parcel. HIGH_STREET_NUM: The street number of the vacant tax parcel. GISEXTDATE: The date and time when the data was last updated. SALE_DATE_datefield: The recorded date of sale of the vacant tax parcel (if available). Source: This data comes from the department of Neighborhood and Business Development, Bureau of Business and Zoning.
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Parcels delineate the approximate boundaries of property ownership as described in Napa County deeds, filed maps, and other source documents. Parcel boundaries in GIS are created and maintained by the Assessor’s Division Mapping section and Information Technology Services. There are approximately 51,300 real property parcels in Napa County. Parcels delineate the approximate boundaries of property ownership as described in Napa County deeds, filed maps, and other source documents. GIS parcel boundaries are maintained by the Information Technology Services GIS team. Assessor Parcel Maps are created and maintained by the Assessor Division Mapping Section. Each parcel has an Assessor Parcel Number (APN) that is its unique identifier. The APN is the link to various Napa County databases containing information such as owner name, situs address, property value, land use, zoning, flood data, and other related information. Data for this map service is sourced from the Napa County Parcels dataset which is updated nightly with any recent changes made by the mapping team. There may at times be a delay between when a document is recorded and when the new parcel boundary configuration and corresponding information is available in the online GIS parcel viewer.From 1850 to early 1900s assessor staff wrote the name of the property owner and the property value on map pages. They began using larger maps, called “tank maps” because of the large steel cabinet they were kept in, organized by school district (before unification) on which names and values were written. In the 1920s, the assessor kept large books of maps by road district on which names were written. In the 1950s, most county assessors contracted with the State Board of Equalization for board staff to draw standardized 11x17 inch maps following the provisions of Assessor Handbook 215. Maps were originally drawn on linen. By the 1980’s Assessor maps were being drawn on mylar rather than linen. In the early 1990s Napa County transitioned from drawing on mylar to creating maps in AutoCAD. When GIS arrived in Napa County in the mid-1990s, the AutoCAD images were copied over into the GIS parcel layer. Sidwell, an independent consultant, was then contracted by the Assessor’s Office to convert these APN files into the current seamless ArcGIS parcel fabric for the entire County. Beginning with the 2024-2025 assessment roll, the maps are being drawn directly in the parcel fabric layer.Parcels in the GIS parcel fabric are drawn according to the legal description using coordinate geometry (COGO) drawing tools and various reference data such as Public Lands Survey section boundaries and road centerlines. The legal descriptions are not defined by the GIS parcel fabric. Any changes made in the GIS parcel fabric via official records, filed maps, and other source documents are uploaded overnight. There is always at least a 6-month delay between when a document is recorded and when the new parcel configuration and corresponding information is available in the online parcel viewer for search or download.Parcel boundary accuracy can vary significantly, with errors ranging from a few feet to several hundred feet. These distortions are caused by several factors such as: the map projection - the error derived when a spherical coordinate system model is projected into a planar coordinate system using the local projected coordinate system; and the ground to grid conversion - the distortion between ground survey measurements and the virtual grid measurements. The aim of the parcel fabric is to construct a visual interpretation that is adequate for basic geographic understanding. This digital data is intended for illustration and demonstration purposes only and is not considered a legal resource, nor legally authoritative.SFAP & CFAP DISCLAIMER: Per the California Code, RTC 606. some legal parcels may have been combined for assessment purposes (CFAP) or separated for assessment purposes (SFAP) into multiple parcels for a variety of tax assessment reasons. SFAP and CFAP parcels are assigned their own APN number and primarily result from a parcel being split by a tax rate area boundary, due to a recorded land use lease, or by request of the property owner. Assessor parcel (APN) maps reflect when parcels have been separated or combined for assessment purposes, and are one legal entity. The goal of the GIS parcel fabric data is to distinguish the SFAP and CFAP parcel configurations from the legal configurations, to convey the legal parcel configurations. This workflow is in progress. Please be advised that while we endeavor to restore SFAP and CFAP parcels back to their legal configurations in the primary parcel fabric layer, SFAP and CFAP parcels may be distributed throughout the dataset. Parcels that have been restored to their legal configurations, do not reflect the SFAP or CFAP parcel configurations that correspond to the current property tax delineations. We intend for parcel reports and parcel data to capture when a parcel has been separated or combined for assessment purposes, however in some cases, information may not be available in GIS for the SFAP/CFAP status of a parcel configuration shown. For help or questions regarding a parcel’s SFAP/CFAP status, or property survey data, please visit Napa County’s Surveying Services or Property Mapping Information. For more information you can visit our website: When a Parcel is Not a Parcel | Napa County, CA
Data last synced 08-29-2025 04:24. Data synced on a Weekly interval.
Parcel feature class was created 03/02/2023. It is actively undergoing edits and is updated on a monthly basis.
SCIPS Statistics:
- 378 parcels have no SCIPS table match
- 213 are parcels added to The Villages at Vanden Meadows
- 125 are parcels with no APN recorded in the Tax Map (these are marked with 'No GIS Primary Table APN Match' in the PARCELID field).
- 27 are parcels that have APNs in the tax maps but have been prerecorded as not having a SCIPS match (these are marked with 'Currently Under Review as of 6/30/2022' in the Data Notes field).
- 5 represent land/base parcels that have condos overlaying them- the land parcels have an APN in the tax map.
- 8 remaining have land use codes of VACANT COMMERCIAL, VACANT RESIDENTIAL, TRANSITIONAL LAND, TAXABLE BELOW MINIMUM VALUE, & LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
- 34 SCIPS table records have no parcel match
- 2 SCIPS records with an ACTIVE status have a use description of NEWLY CREATED PARCELS.
- 32 SCIPS records with an ACTIVE status have a use description of one of the following: RIGHT OF WAY, GOVERNMENTAL & MISCELLANEOUS, AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY, VACANT COMMERCIAL LAND, TAXABLE BELOW MINIMUM VALUE, RAW SUBDIVISION LAND, VACANT RESIDENTIAL LAND < 1 AC.
Topology is built to flag overlaps and gaps within the data. However, the current data condition has exceptions. Overlap exceptions include overlapping air parcels depicting multistory buildings, such as condos, business parks, and trailer parks. Gap exceptions include missing right-of-way parcels and open space areas. These exceptions are being corrected where information within the Tax Maps is available.
As of the data's creation date:
- 4568 gaps exist
- 2403 overlaps exist
Fields:
PARCELID - APN Number
Data_Notes - Notes from GTG Team
GIS_Acreage - Measured Acreage Value
Xcentroid - X Centroid Value
Ycentroid - Y Centroid Value
AssessorMap - Link to Tax Map
PropertyChar - Link to Property Characteristics
TaxInfo - Link to Tax Information
asmtnum – PIN
rollyear - Current Tax Roll Year
acres - Recorded Acreage Value
lotsize – Lot Size Square Footage
usecode - Use Code
use_desc - Use Code Description
subdiv – Subdivision Name
qclass – Quality Class
yrblt - Year Built
status – PIN Status
valland - Land Value
valimp – Improvement Value
valtv – Trees & Vine Value
valfme – Fixed Machinery & Equipment Value
valpp – Personal Property Value
valpen – Penalty Value
assessee – Assessee Name
addr1 – Mailing Address 1
addr2 – Mailing Address 2
addr3 – Mailing Address 3
addr3_city - Address 3 City Name
addr3_state - Address 3 State Name
addrzip – Mailing Address Zip Code
situs – Site Address (YS/NO)
sitenum – Site Number
siteroad – Site Street Name
parceladdress – Site Number & Street
sitecity – Site City Name
unitbldg – Site Unit/Building
williamson_act – Williamson Act (YS/NO)
wa_status – Williamson Act Status Code
wa_contract – Williamson Act Contract Number
wa_prime – Total Prime Acreage
wa_nonprime – Total Nonprime Acreage
wa_excluded – Total Excluded Acreage
pcl_createdate - Parcel Creation Date
pcl_inactdate - Parcel Inactivation Date
first_area - First Floor Area
second_area - Second Floor Area
third_area - Third Area
other_area - Other Area
garage_area - Garage Area
total_area - Total Area
stories - Number of Stories
bedroom - Number of Bedrooms
bathroom - Number of Bathrooms
dining - Dining Room (Space, YS, NO)
family - Family Room (Space, YS, NO)
other_room - Number of Other Rooms
utility - Utility Room (Space, YS, NO)
total_rooms - Total Rooms
fireplc – Fireplace (Space, YS, NO, 1, 2…)
hvac - HVAC Code
pool – Swimming Pool (Space, YS, NO)
solar - Solar (Space, YS, NO)
tac - TAG
tac_city – TAG City Name
govt_owned – Govt Owned
hotype – Home Owner Exemption Type
zone1 – Zoning Code #1
zone2 – Zoning Code #2
z2acres – Zoning Code #2 Acreage
remark – Zoning Remark
lndivnum – Land Division Number
lndivdate – Land Division Date
site_status – Zoning Site Status
pudnum - Public Utility District Number
datevar – Date Verified
varnum – Variance Number
plfiltyp1 – File Type 1
plfilno1 – File 1 Number
plfiltyp2 – File Type 2
plfilno2 – File 2 Number
fund_fire – Fire District
desc_fire - Fire District Description
fund_school - School District
desc_school – School District Description
fund_water – Water District
desc_water – Water District Description
fund_air_board – Air Board District
desc_air_board - Air Board District Description
fund_soil_cons - Soil Conservation District
desc_soil_cons – Soil Conservation District Description
Acreage_Diff - Acreage Difference
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Update information can be found within the layer’s attributes and in a table on the Utah Parcel Data webpage under LIR Parcels.In Spring of 2016, the Land Information Records work group, an informal committee organized by the Governor’s Office of Management and Budget’s State Planning Coordinator, produced recommendations for expanding the sharing of GIS-based parcel information. Participants in the LIR work group included representatives from county, regional, and state government, including the Utah Association of Counties (County Assessors and County Recorders), Wasatch Front Regional Council, Mountainland and Bear River AOGs, Utah League of Cities and Towns, UDOT, DNR, AGRC, the Division of Emergency Management, Blue Stakes, economic developers, and academic researchers. The LIR work group’s recommendations set the stage for voluntary sharing of additional objective/quantitative parcel GIS data, primarily around tax assessment-related information. Specifically the recommendations document establishes objectives, principles (including the role of local and state government), data content items, expected users, and a general process for data aggregation and publishing. An important realization made by the group was that ‘parcel data’ or ‘parcel record’ products have a different meaning to different users and data stewards. The LIR group focused, specifically, on defining a data sharing recommendation around a tax year parcel GIS data product, aligned with the finalization of the property tax roll by County Assessors on May 22nd of each year. The LIR recommendations do not impact the periodic sharing of basic parcel GIS data (boundary, ID, address) from the County Recorders to AGRC per 63F-1-506 (3.b.vi). Both the tax year parcel and the basic parcel GIS layers are designed for general purpose uses, and are not substitutes for researching and obtaining the most current, legal land records information on file in County records. This document, below, proposes a schedule, guidelines, and process for assembling county parcel and assessment data into an annual, statewide tax parcel GIS layer. gis.utah.gov/data/sgid-cadastre/ It is hoped that this new expanded parcel GIS layer will be put to immediate use supporting the best possible outcomes in public safety, economic development, transportation, planning, and the provision of public services. Another aim of the work group was to improve the usability of the data, through development of content guidelines and consistent metadata documentation, and the efficiency with which the data sharing is distributed.GIS Layer Boundary Geometry:GIS Format Data Files: Ideally, Tax Year Parcel data should be provided in a shapefile (please include the .shp, .shx, .dbf, .prj, and .xml component files) or file geodatabase format. An empty shapefile and file geodatabase schema are available for download at:At the request of a county, AGRC will provide technical assistance to counties to extract, transform, and load parcel and assessment information into the GIS layer format.Geographic Coverage: Tax year parcel polygons should cover the area of each county for which assessment information is created and digital parcels are available. Full coverage may not be available yet for each county. The county may provide parcels that have been adjusted to remove gaps and overlaps for administrative tax purposes or parcels that retain these expected discrepancies that take their source from the legally described boundary or the process of digital conversion. The diversity of topological approaches will be noted in the metadata.One Tax Parcel Record Per Unique Tax Notice: Some counties produce an annual tax year parcel GIS layer with one parcel polygon per tax notice. In some cases, adjacent parcel polygons that compose a single taxed property must be merged into a single polygon. This is the goal for the statewide layer but may not be possible in all counties. AGRC will provide technical support to counties, where needed, to merge GIS parcel boundaries into the best format to match with the annual assessment information.Standard Coordinate System: Parcels will be loaded into Utah’s statewide coordinate system, Universal Transverse Mercator coordinates (NAD83, Zone 12 North). However, boundaries stored in other industry standard coordinate systems will be accepted if they are both defined within the data file(s) and documented in the metadata (see below).Descriptive Attributes:Database Field/Column Definitions: The table below indicates the field names and definitions for attributes requested for each Tax Parcel Polygon record.FIELD NAME FIELD TYPE LENGTH DESCRIPTION EXAMPLE SHAPE (expected) Geometry n/a The boundary of an individual parcel or merged parcels that corresponds with a single county tax notice ex. polygon boundary in UTM NAD83 Zone 12 N or other industry standard coordinates including state plane systemsCOUNTY_NAME Text 20 - County name including spaces ex. BOX ELDERCOUNTY_ID (expected) Text 2 - County ID Number ex. Beaver = 1, Box Elder = 2, Cache = 3,..., Weber = 29ASSESSOR_SRC (expected) Text 100 - Website URL, will be to County Assessor in most all cases ex. webercounty.org/assessorBOUNDARY_SRC (expected) Text 100 - Website URL, will be to County Recorder in most all cases ex. webercounty.org/recorderDISCLAIMER (added by State) Text 50 - Disclaimer URL ex. gis.utah.gov...CURRENT_ASOF (expected) Date - Parcels current as of date ex. 01/01/2016PARCEL_ID (expected) Text 50 - County designated Unique ID number for individual parcels ex. 15034520070000PARCEL_ADD (expected, where available) Text 100 - Parcel’s street address location. Usually the address at recordation ex. 810 S 900 E #304 (example for a condo)TAXEXEMPT_TYPE (expected) Text 100 - Primary category of granted tax exemption ex. None, Religious, Government, Agriculture, Conservation Easement, Other Open Space, OtherTAX_DISTRICT (expected, where applicable) Text 10 - The coding the county uses to identify a unique combination of property tax levying entities ex. 17ATOTAL_MKT_VALUE (expected) Decimal - Total market value of parcel's land, structures, and other improvements as determined by the Assessor for the most current tax year ex. 332000LAND _MKT_VALUE (expected) Decimal - The market value of the parcel's land as determined by the Assessor for the most current tax year ex. 80600PARCEL_ACRES (expected) Decimal - Parcel size in acres ex. 20.360PROP_CLASS (expected) Text 100 - Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Mixed, Agricultural, Vacant, Open Space, Other ex. ResidentialPRIMARY_RES (expected) Text 1 - Is the property a primary residence(s): Y'(es), 'N'(o), or 'U'(nknown) ex. YHOUSING_CNT (expected, where applicable) Text 10 - Number of housing units, can be single number or range like '5-10' ex. 1SUBDIV_NAME (optional) Text 100 - Subdivision name if applicable ex. Highland Manor SubdivisionBLDG_SQFT (expected, where applicable) Integer - Square footage of primary bldg(s) ex. 2816BLDG_SQFT_INFO (expected, where applicable) Text 100 - Note for how building square footage is counted by the County ex. Only finished above and below grade areas are counted.FLOORS_CNT (expected, where applicable) Decimal - Number of floors as reported in county records ex. 2FLOORS_INFO (expected, where applicable) Text 100 - Note for how floors are counted by the County ex. Only above grade floors are countedBUILT_YR (expected, where applicable) Short - Estimated year of initial construction of primary buildings ex. 1968EFFBUILT_YR (optional, where applicable) Short - The 'effective' year built' of primary buildings that factors in updates after construction ex. 1980CONST_MATERIAL (optional, where applicable) Text 100 - Construction Material Types, Values for this field are expected to vary greatly by county ex. Wood Frame, Brick, etc Contact: Sean Fernandez, Cadastral Manager (email: sfernandez@utah.gov; office phone: 801-209-9359)
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset contains files created, digitized, or georeferenced by Chris DeRolph for mapping the pre-urban renewal community within the boundaries of the Riverfront-Willow St. and Mountain View urban renewal projects in Knoxville TN. Detailed occupant information for properties within boundaries of these two urban renewal projects was extracted from the 1953 Knoxville City Directory. The year 1953 was chosen as a representative snapshot of the Black community before urban renewal projects were implemented. The first urban renewal project to be approved was the Riverfront-Willow Street project, which was approved in 1954 according to the University of Richmond Renewing Inequality project titled ‘Family Displacements through Urban Renewal, 1950-1966’ (link below in the 'Other shapefiles' section). For ArcGIS Online users, the shapefile and tiff layers are available in AGOL and can be found by clicking the ellipsis next to the layer name and selecting 'Show item details' for the layers in this webmap https://knoxatlas.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=43a66c3cfcde4f5f8e7ab13af9bbcebecityDirectory1953 is a folder that contains:JPG images of 1953 City Directory for street segments within the urban renewal project boundaries; images collected at the McClung Historical CollectionTXT files of extracted text from each image that was used to join occupant information from directory to GIS address datashp is a folder that contains the following shapefiles:Residential:Black_owned_residential_1953.shp: residential entries in the 1953 City Directory identified as Black and property ownersBlack_rented_residential_1953.shp: residential entries in the 1953 City Directory identified as Black and non-owners of the propertyNon_Black_owned_residential_1953.shp: residential entries in the 1953 City Directory identified as property owners that were not listed as BlackNon_Black_rented_residential_1953.shp: residential entries in the 1953 City Directory not listed as Black or property ownersResidential shapefile attributes:cityDrctryString: full text string from 1953 City Directory entryfileName: name of TXT file that contains the information for the street segmentsOccupant: the name of the occupant listed in the City Directory, enclosed in square brackets []Number: the address number listed in the 1953 City DirectoryBlackOccpt: flag for whether the occupant was identified in the City Directory as Black, designated by the (c) or (e) character string in the cityDrctryString fieldOwnerOccpd: flag for whether the occupant was identified in the City Directory as the property owner, designated by the @ character in the cityDrctryString fieldUnit: unit if listed (e.g. Apt 1, 2d fl, b'ment, etc)streetName: street name in ~1953Lat: latitude coordinate in decimal degrees for the property locationLon: longitude coordinate in decimal degrees for the property locationrace_own: combines the BlackOccpt and OwnerOccpd fieldsmapLabel: combines the Number and Occupant fields for map labeling purposeslastName: occupant's last namelabelShort: combines the Number and lastName fields for map labeling purposesNon-residential:Black_nonResidential_1953.shp: non-residential entries in the 1953 City Directory listed as Black-occupiedNonBlack_nonResidential_1953.shp: non-residential entries in the 1953 City Directory not listed as Black-occupiedNon-residential shapefile attributes:cityDrctryString: full text string from 1953 City Directory entryfileName: name of TXT file that contains the information for the street segmentsOccupant: the name of the occupant listed in the City Directory, enclosed in square brackets []Number: the address number listed in the 1953 City DirectoryBlackOccpt: flag for whether the occupant was identified in the City Directory as Black, designated by the (c) or (e) character string in the cityDrctryString fieldOwnerOccpd: flag for whether the occupant was identified in the City Directory as the property owner, designated by the @ character in the cityDrctryString fieldUnit: unit if listed (e.g. Apt 1, 2d fl, b'ment, etc)streetName: street name in ~1953Lat: latitude coordinate in decimal degrees for the property locationLon: longitude coordinate in decimal degrees for the property locationNAICS6: 2022 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) six-digit business code, designated by Chris DeRolph rapidly and without careful considerationNAICS6title: NAICS6 title/short descriptionNAICS3: 2022 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) three-digit business code, designated by Chris DeRolph rapidly and without careful considerationNAICS3title: NAICS3 title/short descriptionflag: flags whether the occupant is part of the public sector or an NGO; a flag of '0' indicates the occupant is assumed to be a privately-owned businessrace_own: combines the BlackOccpt and OwnerOccpd fieldsmapLabel: combines the Number and Occupant fields for map labeling purposesOther shapefiles:razedArea_1972.shp: approximate area that appears to have been razed during urban renewal based on visual overlay of usgsImage_grayscale_1956.tif and usgsImage_colorinfrared_1972.tif; digitized by Chris DeRolphroadNetwork_preUrbanRenewal.shp: road network present in urban renewal area before razing occurred; removed attribute indicates whether road was removed or remains today; historically removed roads were digitized by Chris DeRolph; remaining roads sourced from TDOT GIS roads dataTheBottom.shp: the approximate extent of the razed neighborhood known as The Bottom; digitized by Chris DeRolphUrbanRenewalProjects.shp: boundaries of the East Knoxville urban renewal projects, as mapped by the University of Richmond's Digital Scholarship Lab https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/renewal/#view=0/0/1&viz=cartogram&city=knoxvilleTN&loc=15/35.9700/-83.9080tiff is a folder that contains the following images:streetMap_1952.tif: relevant section of 1952 map 'Knoxville Tennessee and Surrounding Area'; copyright by J.U.G. Rich and East Tenn Auto Club; drawn by R.G. Austin; full map accessed at McClung Historical Collection, 601 S Gay St, Knoxville, TN 37902; used as reference for street names in roadNetwork_preUrbanRenewal.shp; georeferenced by Chris DeRolphnewsSentinelRdMap_1958.tif: urban renewal area map from 1958 Knox News Sentinel article; used as reference for street names in roadNetwork_preUrbanRenewal.shp; georeferenced by Chris DeRolphusgsImage_grayscale_1956.tif: May 18, 1956 black-and-white USGS aerial photograph, georeferenced by Chris DeRolph; accessed here https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/scene/metadata/full/5e83d8e4870f4473/ARA550590030582/usgsImage_colorinfrared_1972.tif: April 18, 1972 color infrared USGS aerial photograph, georeferenced by Chris DeRolph; accessed here https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/scene/metadata/full/5e83d8e4870f4473/AR6197002600096/usgsImage_grayscale_1976.tif: November 8, 1976 black-and-white USGS aerial photograph, georeferenced by Chris DeRolph; accessed here https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/scene/metadata/full/5e83d8e4870f4473/AR1VDUT00390010/
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Internal view of the parcel layer. This view contains all the attributes that can be seen by County employees.There are approximately 51,300 real property parcels in Napa County. Parcels delineate the approximate boundaries of property ownership as described in Napa County deeds, filed maps, and other source documents. GIS parcel boundaries are maintained by the Information Technology Services GIS team. Assessor Parcel Maps are created and maintained by the Assessor Division Mapping Section. Each parcel has an Assessor Parcel Number (APN) that is its unique identifier. The APN is the link to various Napa County databases containing information such as owner name, situs address, property value, land use, zoning, flood data, and other related information. Data for this map service is sourced from the Napa County Parcels dataset which is updated nightly with any recent changes made by the mapping team. There may at times be a delay between when a document is recorded and when the new parcel boundary configuration and corresponding information is available in the online GIS parcel viewer.From 1850 to early 1900s assessor staff wrote the name of the property owner and the property value on map pages. They began using larger maps, called “tank maps” because of the large steel cabinet they were kept in, organized by school district (before unification) on which names and values were written. In the 1920s, the assessor kept large books of maps by road district on which names were written. In the 1950s, most county assessors contracted with the State Board of Equalization for board staff to draw standardized 11x17 inch maps following the provisions of Assessor Handbook 215. Maps were originally drawn on linen. By the 1980’s Assessor maps were being drawn on mylar rather than linen. In the early 1990s Napa County transitioned from drawing on mylar to creating maps in AutoCAD. When GIS arrived in Napa County in the mid-1990s, the AutoCAD images were copied over into the GIS parcel layer. Sidwell, an independent consultant, was then contracted by the Assessor’s Office to convert these APN files into the current seamless ArcGIS parcel fabric for the entire County. Beginning with the 2024-2025 assessment roll, the maps are being drawn directly in the parcel fabric layer.Parcels in the GIS parcel fabric are drawn according to the legal description using coordinate geometry (COGO) drawing tools and various reference data such as Public Lands Survey section boundaries and road centerlines. The legal descriptions are not defined by the GIS parcel fabric. Any changes made in the GIS parcel fabric via official records, filed maps, and other source documents are uploaded overnight. There is always at least a 6-month delay between when a document is recorded and when the new parcel configuration and corresponding information is available in the online parcel viewer for search or download.Parcel boundary accuracy can vary significantly, with errors ranging from a few feet to several hundred feet. These distortions are caused by several factors such as: the map projection - the error derived when a spherical coordinate system model is projected into a planar coordinate system using the local projected coordinate system; and the ground to grid conversion - the distortion between ground survey measurements and the virtual grid measurements. The aim of the parcel fabric is to construct a visual interpretation that is adequate for basic geographic understanding. This digital data is intended for illustration and demonstration purposes only and is not considered a legal resource, nor legally authoritative.SFAP & CFAP DISCLAIMER: Per the California Code, RTC 606. some legal parcels may have been combined for assessment purposes (CFAP) or separated for assessment purposes (SFAP) into multiple parcels for a variety of tax assessment reasons. SFAP and CFAP parcels are assigned their own APN number and primarily result from a parcel being split by a tax rate area boundary, due to a recorded land use lease, or by request of the property owner. Assessor parcel (APN) maps reflect when parcels have been separated or combined for assessment purposes, and are one legal entity. The goal of the GIS parcel fabric data is to distinguish the SFAP and CFAP parcel configurations from the legal configurations, to convey the legal parcel configurations. This workflow is in progress. Please be advised that while we endeavor to restore SFAP and CFAP parcels back to their legal configurations in the primary parcel fabric layer, SFAP and CFAP parcels may be distributed throughout the dataset. Parcels that have been restored to their legal configurations, do not reflect the SFAP or CFAP parcel configurations that correspond to the current property tax delineations. We intend for parcel reports and parcel data to capture when a parcel has been separated or combined for assessment purposes, however in some cases, information may not be available in GIS for the SFAP/CFAP status of a parcel configuration shown. For help or questions regarding a parcel’s SFAP/CFAP status, or property survey data, please visit Napa County’s Surveying Services or Property Mapping Information. For more information you can visit our website: When a Parcel is Not a Parcel | Napa County, CA