A collection of anonymous, self-reported dream logs capturing emotional states, dream themes (e.g., flying, falling, being chased), sleep patterns, and next-day mood. Useful for exploring connections between subconscious activity, mental well-being, and sleep quality.

List of Top Journals of Pathology Patterns Reviews sorted by citations.

List of Top Authors of Journal of Education and Recreation Patterns sorted by citations.

This is the Altmetric.com data for the set of journal articles used in this research. The data was provided by Altmetric.com, a research metrics company who track and collect the online conversations around millions of scholarly outputs. Altmetric continually monitors a variety of non-traditional sources to provide real-time updates on new mentions and shares of individual research outputs, which are collated and presented to users via Altmetric.com. The data was collated on the 15/08/2016. Any subsequent adjustments to the original data have been made by Dr Lauren Cadwallader and are fully explained in the document.

Predicting the number of citations by article characteristics and tweets.

Predicting the number of tweets by article characteristics.

The graph shows the changes in the g-index of ^ and the corresponding percentile for the sake of comparison with the entire literature. g-index is a scientometric index similar to g-index but put a more weight on the sum of citations. The g-index of a journal is g if the journal has published at least g papers with total citations of g2.

There is a widespread perception in the academic community that peer review is subject to many biases and can be influenced by the identity and biographic features (such as gender) of manuscript authors. We examined how patterns of authorship differ between men and women, and whether author gender influences editorial and peer review outcomes and/or the peer review process for papers submitted to the journal Functional Ecology between 2010 and 2014. Women represented approximately a third of all authors on papers submitted to Functional Ecology. Relative to overall frequency of authorship, women were underrepresented as solo authors (26% were women). On multi-authored papers, women were also underrepresented as last/senior authors (25% were women) but overrepresented as first authors (43% were women). Women first authors were less likely than men first authors to serve as corresponding and submitting author of their papers; this difference was not influenced by the gender of the last author. Women were more likely to be authors on papers if the last author was female. Papers with female authors (i) were equally likely to be sent for peer review, (ii) obtained equivalent peer review scores and (iii) were equally likely to be accepted for publication, compared to papers with male authors. There was no evidence that male editors or male reviewers treated papers authored by women differently than did female editors and reviewers, and no evidence that more senior editors reached different decisions than younger editors after review, or cumulative through the entire process, for papers authored by men vs. women. Papers authored by women were more likely to be reviewed by women. This is primarily because women were more likely to be invited to review if the authors on a paper were female than if the authors were male. Patterns of authorship, and the role undertaken as author (e.g., submitting and serving as corresponding author), differ notably between men and women for papers submitted to Functional Ecology. However, consistent with a growing body of literature indicating that peer review underlying the scholarly publishing process is largely gender-neutral, outcomes of editorial and peer review at Functional Ecology were not influenced by author gender.

The dataset includes benthic infaunal abundance data derived from the EPA National Coastal Assessment and Southern California Coastal Water Research Program Bight ’03 studies west coast shelf assessment studies in 2003, that were combined to form a composite data matrix of 255 stations by 1470 taxa. NCA successfully sampled 146 stations from Cape Flattery, WA, to Pt. Conception, CA in the period June 1 - 26, 2003 (NOAA Cruise AR-03-01-NC), with data from one additional NCA station off Santa Catalina Island provided to the study by SCCWRP. Fifty stations each within Washington and Oregon and 47 stations from California were successfully sampled. An additional 110 stations, located within the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary (27) and throughout the Southern California Bight (83, Pt. Conception, CA to the Mexican border), were successfully sampled for some or all of the NCA parameters within the target depth range by participants in the Bight ’03 survey (Ranasinghe et al. 2007). Benthic macrofaunal samples were obtained from these 257 stations, but two stations (OR03-0010, CA03-4339) failed quality assurance checks, and the final total included benthic samples from 255 stations. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Henkel, S., and W. Nelson. Assessment of spatial patterns in benthic macrofauna of the U.S. west coast continental shelf. Journal of Biogeography. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, USA, 45(12): 2701-2717, (2018).

Objectives: To analyse the total number of newspaper articles citing the four leading general medical journals and to describe national citation patterns. Design: Quantitative content analysis Setting/sample: Full text of 22 general newspapers in 14 countries over the period 2008-2015, collected from LexisNexis. The 14 countries have been categorized into four regions: US, UK, Western World (EU countries other than UK, and Australia, New Zealand and Canada) and Rest of the World (other countries). Main outcome measure: Press citations of four medical journals (two American: NEJM and JAMA; and two British: The Lancet and The BMJ) in 22 newspapers. Results: British and American newspapers cited some of the four analysed medical journals about three times a week in 2008-2015 (weekly mean 3.2 and 2.7 citations respectively); the newspapers from other Western countries did so about once a week (weekly mean 1.1), and those from the Rest of the World cited them about once a month (monthly mean 1.1). The New York Times cited above all other newspapers (weekly mean 4.7). The analysis showed the existence of three national citation patterns in the daily press: American newspapers cited mostly American journals (70.0% of citations), British newspapers cited mostly British journals (86.5%), and the rest of the analysed press cited more British journals than American ones. The Lancet was the most cited journal in the press of almost all Western countries outside the US and the UK. Multivariate correspondence analysis confirmed the national patterns and showed that over 85% of the citation data variability is retained in just one single new variable: the national dimension. Conclusion: British and American newspapers are the ones that cite the four analysed medical journals more often, showing a domestic preference for their respective national journals; non-British and non-American newspapers show a common international citation pattern.

Response data for "A Psychology-based Unified Dynamic Framework for Curriculum Learning", accepted at Computational Linguistics journal. This data can be used in conjunction with the GitHub repository for the paper.

  Citation

If you use this code, please cite our paper: @article{meng2025psychology, title={A Psychology-based Unified Dynamic Framework for Curriculum Learning}, author={Meng, Guangyu and Zeng, Qinkai and Lalor, John P. and Yu, Hong}, journal={Computational… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/nd-ball/response-patterns.

Patterns of functional diversity along latitudinal gradients of species richness in eleven fish families This repository comprises the raw data relevant for entry into the scripts that generated the patterns for the manuscript titled: Patterns of functional diversity along latitudinal gradients of species richness in eleven fish families, authored by Jonathan Diamond and Denis Roy, in press with Global Ecology and Biogeography https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14668238. You can download the raw data used for this research by clicking on the appropriate files. To process the files as we have for the manuscript, please see the scripts available at the following GitHub script repository: https://github.com/denisroy1/Patterns-of-Functional-Diversity-in-Fishes • Files listed as 'disdffamilyname.txt' correspond to family-specific estimates of functional diversity from the null model with 95% confidence intervals at each latitude. • Files listed 'familyname.txt' represent actual family-l...

This dataset analyzes citations to 994 retracted articles published in Nature Index journals. It classifies how these citations are made, the context in which they appear, and how retracted articles continue to be referenced in scientific discourse.

The dataset includes the following information:

Type of citation: Indicates whether the citation is supportive, neutral, or critical.

Cited DOI & Citing DOI: Unique identifiers for the retracted article and the citing paper.

In-text citation section: Specifies where in the citing paper the citation appears (e.g., introduction, methods, discussion).

In-text citation statement: The direct citation statement referencing the retracted study in the citing paper.

Classification of citation statement: Categorization of how the retracted article is cited (e.g., supportive, neutral, critical).

Metadata of citing papers:

Title, publication year, authors, journal name, volume, issue, and publisher details.

Editorial notices (corrections, expressions of concern, or retraction statements).

Citation statistics:

Total citing publications: The number of papers citing the retracted article.

Total citation statements: The total number of individual references to the retracted article across different papers.

Supporting citations: Citations that endorse the retracted study.

Mentioning citations: Neutral references to the retracted study.

Contrasting citations: Citations that criticize or refute the retracted study.

This dataset provides a comprehensive resource for analyzing how retracted articles continue to receive citations in academic literature.

Date: March 2025

The following dataset presents all of the specimen records included in the paper titled: Distributional and species richness patterns of the stoneflies (Insecta, Plecoptera) in New York State. This paper is published in Biodiversity Data Journal. This dataset combines specimen record data from Colorado State University Insect Collection, Lake Champlain Research Institute, New York State Museum, Illinois Natural History Survey Insect Collection, Cornell University Insect Collection, and several other institutional, personal, and literature records. The data includes specimens to their lowest possible taxonomic rank based on identification and determination. The data includes geo-references for all specimens. This data file contains a total of 6553 records, structured in 62 columns of data in DwCA format.

Authorship of submitted papers_anonymizedThe submitted papers dataset used for analyses in Fox et al. The dataset has been anonymized by removing author country identifiers (and associated country data), inclusion of which could allow some authors to be identified; the dataset only includes higher level geographic locations.Data for Dryad_anonymized.xlsx

This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Turner, Ian M., Utteridge, Timothy M. A. (2017): Annonaceae in the Western Pacific: geographic patterns and four new species. European Journal of Taxonomy 339: 1-44, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2017.339

List of Top Institutions of Journal of Education and Recreation Patterns sorted by citations.

This dataset cotains supplementary data for the journal article "Simulating past land use patterns; the impact of the Romans on the Lower-Rhine delta in the first century AD" published in the "Journal of Archaeological Science Research"

Our primary aim was to assess the hypothesis that distinctive features of the patterns of vegetation change during successive Quaternary glacial–interglacial cycles reflect climatic differences arising from forcing differences. We addressed this hypothesis using 207 half-degree resolution global biome pattern simulations, for time slices between 800 ka and 2 ka, made using the LPJ-GUESS dynamic global vegetation model. Simulations were driven using ice-core atmospheric CO2 concentrations, Earth’s obliquity, and outputs from a pre-industrial and 206 palaeoclimate experiments; four additional simulations were driven using projected future CO2 concentrations. Climate experiments were run using HadCM3. Using a rule-based approach, above-ground biomass and leaf area index of LPJ-GUESS plant functional types were used to infer each grid cell’s biome. The hypothesis is supported by the palaeobiome simulations. To enable comparisons with the climatic forcing, multivariate analyses were performe...

Data to support a paper in revision for Journal of Biogeography: Fabio Mologni, Peter J. Bellingham, Even Tjorve, Ewen K. Cameron, Anthony E. Wright, and Kevin C. Burns “Similar yet distinct distributional patterns characterize native and exotic plant species richness across islands in New Zealand”