In 2022, the percentage of workers in the U.S. who used public transportation to travel to and from work amounted to a scant 3.1 percent, down from over five percent in the mid-2010s. The public transport share has, however, increased from 2021, when only 2.5 percent of commuters travelled by public transport.

The percentage of commuters that use public transit out of all commuters aged 16 and above. Source: American Community SurveyYears Available: 2007-2011, 2008-2012, 2009-2013, 2010-2014, 2011-2015, 2012-2016, 2013-2017, 2014-2018, 2015-2019, 2016-2020, 2017-2021, 2018-2022, 2019-2023Please note: We do not recommend comparing overlapping years of data due to the nature of this dataset. For more information, please visit: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/guidance/comparing-acs-data.html

The statistic illustrates the results of a survey that took place from 2008 to 2015 among U.S. adults about their public transit use; the results were grouped by household income income. Some 22 percent of the transit riders had an income between 25,000 to 49,999 U.S. dollars.

The statistic depicts the results of a survey that took place from 2008 to 2015 among U.S. adults about the use of public transit; the results were grouped by race or ethnicity and transit mode. Some 35 percent of the bus transit riders were of White or Caucasian origin.

In 2020, the number of public transport trips in Paris and the Île-de-France region amounted to approximately 2.6 billion journeys, from which around 28.4 percent took place in the metro network. During the same year the passenger traffic in the public transport in the whole French territory reached 26.7 billion passenger-kilometers.

A wide public transport network

Public transport in Paris is composed by a large network of metro stations, bus lines, suburban trains and tram services. These different means of transport make it possible to travel in the French capital but also within the large suburbs surrounding Paris. Thus, more than 759 million people used the suburban trains called RER which connects Paris to the suburbs in 2020. The Île-de-France region, which contains Paris, is the most populated region in France. More than 12 million people live in this region and a lot of them work in or around Paris. Almost 70 percent of people living in the French capital use metro, buses or suburban trains to go to work, compared to 40.7 percent of employees in Lyon, the third most populous city in France.

A cheap and sustainable network

In comparison with other cities worldwide, public transportation in Paris seems to be pretty cheap. The average cost for public transport in London was 5.66 US dollars, whereas the average ticket in Berlin amounted to 3.73 US dollars. When it comes to Paris, an average ticket in the French capital had a price of 2.34 US dollars in 2018.

Global Private Bus Service Market market valued at US$ 29.99 Billion in 2023, projected to grow 5.4% CAGR to US$ 48.14 Billion by 2032.

As of 2022, single-ride tickets were the most prevalent type of fare collection media with 54.9 percent of public transport agencies in the United States and Canada using them. Magnetic stored-time cards and smart cards were next with 46.7 and 45.7 percent respectively. The three least common modes are tokens, multi-ride tickets, and punch cards with 18.5, 10.3, and 6.6 percent respectively.

This table contains data on the percent of population residing within ½ mile of a major transit stop for four California regions and the counties, cities/towns, and census tracts within the regions. The percent was calculated using data from four metropolitan planning organizations (San Diego Association of Governments, Southern California Association of Governments, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and Sacramento Council of Governments) and the U.S. Census Bureau. The table is part of a series of indicators in the Healthy Communities Data and Indicators Project of the Office of Health Equity. A strong and sustainable transportation system supports safe, reliable, and affordable transportation opportunities for walking, bicycling, and public transit, and helps reduce health inequities by providing more opportunities for access to healthy food, jobs, health care, education, and other essential services. Active and public transportation promote health by enabling individuals to increase their level of physical activity, potentially reducing the risk of heart disease and obesity, improving mental health, and lowering blood pressure. More information about the data table and a data dictionary can be found in the About/Attachments section.

In 2022, almost 67 percent of workers in the U.S. commuted by personal vehicle on their own. During the same year, only 3.1 percent of Americans workers traveled to work using public transportation. Meanwhile, around 15 percent of U.S. Americans worked from home.

In November 2021, the U.S. Congress passed the new Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill with a five-year total authorized budget for public transit of more than 69 billion U.S. dollars for all the states and other jurisdictions. From 2022 to 2026, the state with the highest public funding for public transportation in the U.S. will be New York with an authorized budget of around 11.2 billion U.S. dollars, followed by California and New Jersey with a budget of 10.3 and 4.5 billion U.S. dollars respectively. Buses dominate U.S. public transport In 2021, the U.S. public transit network generated 53.1 billion U.S. dollars in operating revenue, marking a slight decline from the previous year. Buses remain the primary mode of public transport, making up nearly half of all trips in 2023, with heavy rail accounting for 36 percent of unlinked trips. By 2022, only about three percent of American workers used public transportation for their commute, a drop from roughly five percent in 2015. New York’s public transportation system is leading in the United States The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) runs the New York City metropolitan area public transportation system, and it is the largest transit authority in the United States. In 2023, New York's heavy rail transit system was the busiest in the United States, recording more than two billion passenger journeys annually. That year, the New York subway transported almost more than 15 times as many passengers as the second-largest network in the U.S. in Washington, D.C.

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Bus market size will be USD 51245.6 million in 2024. It will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.60% from 2024 to 2031.

North America held the major market share for more than 40% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 20498.24 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.8% from 2024 to 2031.
Europe accounted for a market share of over 30% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 15373.68 million.
Asia Pacific held a market share of around 23% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 11786.49 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.6% from 2024 to 2031.
Latin America had a market share of more than 5% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 2562.28 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.0% from 2024 to 2031.
Middle East and Africa had a market share of around 2% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD 1024.91 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.3% from 2024 to 2031.
The double deck category is the fastest growing segment of the bus industry

Market Dynamics of Bus Market

Key Drivers for Bus Market

Increasing Urbanization and Demand for Public Transit to Boost Market Growth

The growing global urban population is a key driver of the bus market as cities strive to address the rising demand for efficient public transportation. Urbanization has led to heightened traffic congestion and environmental concerns, making buses a cost-effective and eco-friendly solution for mass transit. Governments and municipalities are expanding public bus networks to accommodate the commuting needs of urban dwellers, particularly in developing regions. Additionally, single-deck buses dominate urban settings for their ability to navigate crowded streets and provide frequent services. With rising fuel prices and the push for reducing carbon footprints, city planners are increasingly opting for electric and hybrid buses, enhancing the sustainability of public transit systems. This trend is further bolstered by the integration of smart technologies, such as GPS-enabled tracking and automated fare systems, making public bus services more accessible and efficient, ultimately driving market growth. In addition, the market is anticipated to grow during the projected period as a result of players in the industry adopting Buss. For instance, In the United States, public transportation systems have experienced substantial usage. In 2023, Americans travelled a total of 36.87 billion passenger miles and undertook 7.11 billion trips via public transit. Notably, 87% of these trips directly benefited the local economy, with 50% related to commuting to and from work and 37% for shopping and recreational activities.

Government Policies Promoting Electric and Hybrid Buses to Drive Market Growth

The bus market is significantly influenced by supportive government initiatives and policies encouraging the adoption of electric and hybrid buses. As concerns over climate change and air pollution grow, authorities across the globe are implementing stringent emission regulations and providing financial incentives for the transition to clean energy vehicles. Subsidies, tax benefits, and funding for electric and hybrid bus manufacturing and infrastructure development have accelerated the adoption of these eco-friendly options. For example, countries like China and India have launched large-scale electrification programs to reduce dependency on fossil fuels and improve urban air quality. Moreover, electric buses not only help in achieving sustainability goals but also offer lower operational costs over time, making them appealing to public and private transit operators. The emphasis on creating robust charging infrastructure and investing in advanced battery technologies further ensures the long-term viability of electric buses, driving their market growth.

Restraint Factor for the Bus Market

High Initial Investment Costs Will Limit Market Growth

One of the primary restraints in the bus market is the high initial investment costs associated with the production and procurement of modern buses, particularly electric and hybrid variants. Advanced buses equipped with eco-friendly powertrains, intelligent systems, and enhanced safety features require significant capi...

Graph and download economic data for Expenditures: Public and Other Transportation by Quintiles of Income Before Taxes: Third 20 Percent (41st to 60th Percentile) (CXUPUBTRANSLB0104M) from 1984 to 2023 about public, percentile, tax, transportation, expenditures, income, and USA.

Graph and download economic data for Gross Domestic Product: Transportation and Utilities for United States Metropolitan Portion (NGMPTRANSUTILUSMP) from 2001 to 2023 about metropolitan portion, utilities, transportation, industry, GDP, and USA.

The North America electric bus market is poised to witness substantial growth, with a projected CAGR of 27.65% during the forecast period (2025-2033). Valued at XX million in 2025, the market is expected to reach an impressive value by 2033. Key drivers fueling this growth include rising environmental concerns, government incentives for adopting sustainable transportation solutions, and increasing focus on reducing carbon emissions. The market is segmented based on fuel category (BEV, FCEV, HEV), company, and region. Prominent companies operating in the market include GreenPower Motor Company Inc, GILLIG LLC, Blue Bird Corporation, and BYD Auto Co Ltd, among others. The United States holds a significant market share and is expected to continue its dominance throughout the forecast period. The market is also witnessing a surge in demand for battery electric buses (BEVs), owing to their superior range and lower operating costs compared to other electric bus types. Recent developments include: December 2023: Proterra announced its new EV battery factory in South Carolina as demand for commercial electric vehicles increased.October 2023: BYD (Build Your Dreams) announced that a partnership with the Los Olivos Elementary School District would bring a BYD Type A electric school bus to Santa Barbara County students, making the Los Olivos Elementary School District the first in the United States to have 100% zero-emission fleet of school buses.October 2023: Solaris Bus & Coach Sp. z o.o. entered a contract with the public transport operator Miejski Zakład Komunikacyjny sp. z o.o. in the city of Opole to supply eight e-buses, including six 12-meter and two 18-meter vehicles, as well as to deliver and install charging infrastructure.. Key drivers for this market are: Aggressive Government Focus to Promote the Adoption of Electric Vehicles Fosters the Growth of the Market. Potential restraints include: High Cost of Setting Up EV Charging Stations Hampers the Growth of the Market. Notable trends are: OTHER KEY INDUSTRY TRENDS COVERED IN THE REPORT.

This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2012-2016, to show the method of transportation, in numbers and percentages, that workers use to get to work and their mean travel time, by census tract in the Atlanta region. The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent. The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2012-2016). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.

For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, click here.Attributes: GEOID10 = 2010 Census tract identifier (combination of Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) codes for state, county, and census tract) County = County identifier (combination of Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) codes for state and county) Area_Name = 2010 Census tract name- - - - - -Total_Population = # Total Population, 2016 Total_Population_MOE_2016 = # Total population (Margin of Error), 2016- - - - - -Workers_16_years_and_over = # Workers, 16 years and over, 2016 Workers_16_years_and_over_MOE = # Workers, 16 years and over (Margin of Error), 2016 Car_Truck_Van_drove_alone = # Car, truck, or van - drove alone to work, 2016 Car_Truck_Van_drove_alone_MOE = # Car, truck, or van - drove alone to work (Margin of Error), 2016 Pct_CarTruckVan_drove_alone = % Car, truck, or van - drove alone to work, 2016 Pct_CarTruckVan_drove_alone_MOE = % Car, truck, or van - drove alone to work (Margin of Error), 2016 Car_truck_or_van_carpooled = # Car, truck, or van - carpooled to work, 2016 Car_truck_or_van_carpooled_MOE = # Car, truck, or van - carpooled to work (Margin of Error), 2016 Pct_Car_Truck_Van_carpooled = % Car, truck, or van - carpooled to work, 2016 Pct_Car_Truck_Van_carpooled_MOE = % Car, truck, or van - carpooled to work (Margin of Error), 2016 Public_Transport_not_Taxi = # Public transportation (excluding taxicab) to work, 2016 Public_Transport_not_Taxi_MOE = # Public transportation (excluding taxicab) to work (Margin of Error), 2016 Pct_Public_Transp_not_Taxi = % Public transportation (excluding taxicab) to work, 2016 Pct_Public_Transp_not_Taxi_MOE = % Public transportation (excluding taxicab) to work (Margin of Error), 2016 Worked_at_home = # Worked at home, 2016 Worked_at_home_MOE = # Worked at home (Margin of Error), 2016 Percent_Worked_at_home = % Worked at home, 2016 Percent_Worked_at_home_MOE = % Worked at home (Margin of Error), 2016 Mean_Travel_Time_toWork_min = Mean travel time to work (minutes), 2016 Mean_Travel_Time_toWork_min_MOE = Mean travel time to work (minutes) (Margin of Error), 2016- - - - - -Planning_Region = Planning region designation for ARC purposes AcresLand = Land area within the tract (in acres) AcresWater = Water area within the tract (in acres) AcresTotal = Total area within the tract (in acres) SqMi_Land = Land area within the tract (in square miles) SqMi_Water = Water area within the tract (in square miles) SqMi_Total = Total area within the tract (in square miles) TRACTCE10 = Census tract Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) code. Census tracts are identified by an up to four-digit integer number and may have an optional two-digit suffix; for example 1457.02 or 23. The census tract codes consist of six digits with an implied decimal between the fourth and fifth digit corresponding to the basic census tract number but with leading zeroes and trailing zeroes for census tracts without a suffix. The tract number examples above would have codes of 145702 and 002300, respectively. CountyName = County Name last_edited_date = Last date the feature was edited by ARC Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional CommissionDate: 2012-2016

For additional information, please visit the Atlanta Regional Commission at www.atlantaregional.com.

This feature service contains data from the American Community Survey: 5-year Estimates Subject Tables for City of Bozeman, MT. The attributes come from the Means of Transportation to Work by Selected Characteristics table (S0802). Processing Notes:Data was downloaded from the U.S. Census Bureau and imported into FME to create an AGOL Feature Service. Each attribute has been given an abbreviated alias name derived from the American Community Survey (ACS) categorical descriptions. The Data Dictionary below includes all given ACS attribute name aliases. For example: PublicTransit_PovBelow100pct is the percentage of the population that is below 100% of the poverty level and uses public transportation to get to work. Data DictionaryACS_EST_YR: American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate Subject Tables data yearGEO_ID: Census Bureau geographic identifierNAME: Specified geographyDroveAlone: Means of Transportation to work is by driving aloneCarpool: Means of Transportation to work is by carpoolingPublicTransit: Means of Transportation to work is by using Public TransportationRace/Ethinicity:A: AsianAIAN: American Indian or Alaska NativeBAA: Black or African AmericanHL: Hispanic or LatinoNHPI: Native Hawaiian or other Pacific IslanderW: WhiteOther: Some other raceTwo: Two or more racesPoverty Status:Below100pct: Below 100% of the poverty level100to149pct: 100-149% of the poverty level150pct: at or above 150% of the poverty levelDownload ACS Means of Transportation to Work by Selected Characteristics data for Bozeman, MTAdditional LinksU.S. Census BureauU.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS)About the American Community Survey

This dataset supports measure M.C.5 of SD 2023. The sources of data are the American Community Survey and the Austin Transportation Department. Each row displays the percentage of people in different demographic categories who participated in mobility engagement process as compared to percentage of people in the same demographic category in Austin. This dataset can be used to understand how well the City reaches different communities and subpopulations when soliciting public input. View more details at https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/Percentage-of-participants-in-mobility-public-enga/pfnb-5uev/

In a 2020 survey, 52 percent of male respondents in the U.S. stated that they would much less likely use public transport, if COVID-19 were to spread in their community. In that same survey, 57 percent of people surveyed in the U.S. revealed that they would much less likely use public transport, if their community were to affected by COVID-19.

Snapshot img

Articulated Bus Market Size 2024-2028

The articulated bus market size is forecast to increase by USD 1.88 billion at a CAGR of 5.68% between 2023 and 2028.

The market is witnessing significant growth due to several key factors. One of the primary reasons is the benefits that articulated buses offer over double-decker buses, including better maneuverability in tight city streets and increased passenger capacity. Another trend driving market growth is the increasing adoption of electric articulated buses, which contribute to reducing carbon emissions and improving air quality in urban areas. Design features include fuel-efficient propulsion systems, passenger-centric amenities, and emission regulations aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving air quality. However, the inadequate bus infrastructure in many cities poses a challenge to the market's growth. Subsidies and incentives from governments and transit authorities help mitigate the financial risk for bus manufacturers, driving the market growth. Despite this, the market is expected to continue expanding as governments and transportation authorities invest in modernizing their public transportation systems. Overall, the market is an essential segment In the global public transportation industry, offering innovative solutions to address the growing demand for efficient and eco-friendly mass transit systems.

What will be the Size of the Articulated Bus Market During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

The market caters to the unique transportation needs of urban populations in dense areas, offering increased passenger capacity compared to conventional buses. These buses, also known as bendy buses or accordion buses, feature an articulated joint that allows them to maneuver effectively in crowded urban areas with limited road space. With a focus on low-floor designs and spacious interiors, articulated buses provide a more comfortable and accessible experience for passengers. Transit agencies in burgeoning cities increasingly turn to these buses to expand public transport options, addressing the challenges of rapid population growth and increasing road traffic. As the demand for eco-friendly and fuel-efficient bus transport solutions continues to rise, articulated buses, available in both single and double-decker configurations, offer a flexible and sustainable alternative to conventional buses.

How is this Articulated Bus Industry segmented and which is the largest segment?

The articulated bus industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

Fuel Type

  Diesel
  Electric and hybrid
  Others


Type

  Single-decker bus
  Double-decker bus


Geography

  Europe

    Germany
    France


  APAC

    China


  North America



  South America



  Middle East and Africa

By Fuel Type Insights

The diesel segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

Articulated buses, available in both single-decker and double-decker configurations, cater to the transportation needs of dense urban areas and intracity routes. These buses, featuring low-floor designs and spacious interiors, accommodate larger passenger capacities compared to conventional buses. Transit agencies prioritize sustainable mobility initiatives, leading to the growing popularity of zero-emission electric buses. However, diesel buses continue to dominate the market due to their high range and versatility, suitable for long-haul intercity routes and areas with limited charging infrastructure.

Moreover, urban populations rely on buses for efficient and flexible transportation, especially in crowded city streets with tight turns. The vehicle market consists of various types, including single-decker buses, double-decker buses, airport shuttle services, tour & charter services, and ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) vehicles. Flexible construction and automation technologies, such as lane assist and collision avoidance, enhance safety and passenger comfort. Urban transportation and public transport options continue to evolve, with government laws and environmental concerns shaping the market landscape.

Get a glance at the Articulated Bus Industry report of share of various segments Request Free Sample

The diesel segment was valued at USD 2.95 billion in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Regional Analysis

Europe is estimated to contribute 44% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period.

Technavio's analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and drivers that shape the market during the forecast period.

For more insights on the market share of various regions, Request Free Sample

Articulated bu

This statistic shows the results of a survey conducted in the United States in 2018 on the use of public transport in local transport. Some 5 percent of respondents use public transport for shorter distances within the community several times a week. The Survey Data Table for the Statista survey Cars & Mobility in the United States 2018 contains the complete tables for the survey including various column headings.