Data from the Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (OPN) on perceptions of personal safety in different settings, by personal characteristics, collected between 16 February to 13 March 2022. Also contains data on experiences of harassment in the previous 12 months.

The survey charted Finnish opinion and experiences on policing, public safety and security, victimisation, and services in the neighbourhood. First, the respondents were asked whether certain factors diminishing the attractiveness of the neighbourhood (e.g. drug dealing, vandalism, drinking in public places) occurred in the area. They were asked how often they walk outside in the population centre of their municipality in the evenings or at night, how safe they felt walking outside in their neighbourhood or in the population centre of the municipality late at night during weekend, and how safe they felt alone at home after dark. Views were probed on how serious a threat crime was in the neighbourhood. Experience of crime was investigated by asking whether the respondents had been victims of certain crimes (e.g. actual or attempted car or vehicle theft, housebreaking, other type of theft, violent robbery, threat of violence at work, domestic violence, rape) during the past three years, and where this had happened. Fear of crime was charted by asking how worried the respondents were about particular crimes (e.g. housebreaking, fire, traffic accident, rape or sexual harassment, being offered drugs, being threatened with violence) happening to them. Experiences of the police were studied by asking whether the respondents had had contact with the police as crime victims, witnesses or suspects, while getting a driving licence or a new passport, or during traffic control. The respondents rated with a scale of 4-10 how well the police performed in its tasks (crime prevention, traffic control, handling domestic violence situations, solving crimes, etc.). They also rated how important various police services and tasks were. Worry over certain things happening to them or in general in the future (e.g. loneliness, financial difficulties, illness, cuts in health or police services, exclusion, international terrorism) was charted. Views on whether certain measures would increase the safety of the neighbourhood were studied. The respondents rated the services of the municipality, including care of persons with drug or alcohol problems, child care, youth services, road maintenance, environmental protection, etc. General trust in people and satisfaction with the neighbourhood were charted. Background variables included the respondent's gender, year of birth, education, employment status, type of accommodation, housing tenure, type of neighbourhood, number of children aged under 18 living at home, jurisdictional district, and province and region of residence.

This dataset evaluates 'Ever-partnered women aged 18 years and over who experienced violence or emotional abuse by a partner they lived with'. Cells in this table have been randomly adjusted to avoid the release of confidential data. Discrepancies may occur between sums of the component items and totals. 'Physical violence' includes physical assault and/or physical threat. 'Total violence' includes physical violence and/or sexual violence. 'Total ever-partnered women' includes all women who have or had a partner since the age of 15. 'Has a disability or long-term health condition' refers to a person who was defined as having a disability or long-term health condition if they had one or more conditions which had lasted, or were likely to last, for six months or more, and that restricted every day activities. People were identified as having a profound or severe core-activity limitation if they required help or supervision for one or more core activities, such as self-care, mobility or communication. For further information refer to the Glossary. Further, a specific requirement of the PSS was that interviews were conducted in private. Where a respondent required the assistance of another person to communicate with the interviewer, proxy interviews were conducted for a limited amount of the survey and this data was not retained on the final weighted file. Therefore it is likely that the PSS will under represent those with a profound or severe disability. For more details regarding proxy interviews refer to the Proxy section of the Survey Development and Data Collection page of the Personal Safety Survey, Australia: User Guide, 2016 (cat. no. 4906.0.55.003). Approximately 33% of respondents who reported a profound/severe disability, were not included in the final sample due to proxy use, or opting out. 'Australia' includes external territories. 'Main English speaking countries' includes Canada, Republic of Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa, United Kingdom and United States of America. 'Other countries' are inadequately described.

The following table, produced by the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR) provides information on rates, trends and patterns in domestic violence incidents reported to, or detected by, the NSW Police Force for the period of 2017/18. The data has been aggregated to location following the 2018 Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) edition of the Local Government Areas (LGAs). Domestic violence is a serious problem which impacts many NSW families. In 2012, an estimated 16.9 per cent of Australian women aged 18 years and over had experienced partner violence since the age of 15 years (ABS Personal Safety Survey 2012). Rate calculations should also be treated very cautiously for LGAs that have high visitor numbers relative to their residential population. This is because rate calculations are based on estimated residential population and no adjustment has been made for the number of people visiting each LGA per year. For the rate calculations, specialised population data were prepared and provided to BOCSAR by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). For more information please visit the BOSCAR Portal. Please note: AURIN has spatially enabled the original data. LGAs which have populations less than 3000 has been suppressed to maintain confidentiality. Original data values of "n.c." have been set to null.

Estimates from the sources of support and personal safety module of the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) on young people aged 16- to 29-year-olds perceptions and experiences of violence and who they trust.

The General Social Survey (GSS) program gathers data on social subjects in order to monitor changes in the living conditions and well being of Canadians over time and to provide immediate information on specific social policy issues of current or emerging interest.Cycle 18 of the GSS is the fourth cycle dedicated to the topic of victimization; previous cycles were carried out in 1988, 1993, and 1999. Content from Cycle 13 on senior abuse and public perception of alternatives to imprisonment was not repeated. New topics of interest were added including stalking, use of restraining orders and social disorder. Other subjects common to all four cycles include perceptions of crime, police and courts; crime prevention precautions; and accident and crime incident reports.

Tempe’s trust data for this measure is collected every month and comes from the “Safety” result from the monthly administered Police Sentiment Survey. There is one question which feeds into these results: "When it comes to the threat of crime, how safe do you feel in your neighborhood?" Benchmark data is from cohorts of communities with similar characteristics, such as size, population density, and region. This data is collected every month and quarter via a recurring report.This page provides data for the Feeling of Safety in Your Neighborhood performance measure. The performance measure dashboard is available at 1.05 Feeling of Safety in Your Neighborhood.Data Dictionary Additional Information Source: Zencity Contact: Amber Asburry Contact email: strategic_management_innovation@tempe.gov Data Source Type: Excel, CSV Preparation Method: Take the "Safety" score from the Police Sentiment Survey. This score includes the average of the top two results from the question underneath this area on the report. These months are then averaged to get the quarterly score. Publish Frequency: Monthly Publish Method: Manual

The mission of the Tempe Police Department is to reduce harm in our community, and an important component of this mission is to ensure citizens and visitors feel safe in Tempe. One of the Police Department’s five Key Initiatives is to address crime and fear of crime. This is achieved through responding to citizen calls for police service, addressing crime throughout the city, and working with the community to prevent crime. The Police Department uses data from the annual Community Survey and the Business Survey and other data sources to study crime trends and implement strategies to enhance safety and the feeling of safety in Tempe. Data for this performance measure is drawn from a monthly survey of Tempe residents conducted by Elucd.This data contains monthly survey results on residents feelings of safety in their neighborhood, ranging between 0 and 100.The performance measure page is available at 1.05 Feeling of Safety in Your Neighborhood.Additional InformationSource: This measure comes from a question asked of residents in the monthly sentiment survey conducted by Elucd. Contact (author): Contact E-Mail (author): Contact (maintainer): Brooks LoutonContact E-Mail (maintainer): Brooks_Louton@tempe.govData Source Type: ExcelPreparation Method: ManualPublish Frequency: AnnuallyPublish Method: ManualData Dictionary

YPBAS is a school-based survey conducted among 11-16 year-olds. The research covers a range of topics such as demographics, social support, money, school, subject choices & further education, starting a business, nutrition, sport and physical activity, libraries, arts, modern technology, environment, travelling to school, road safety, policing, attitudes towards domestic violence, anti-social behaviour and personal safety, knife culture, smoking, alcohol, drugs and sexual experience & knowledge. Source agency: Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency Designation: Official Statistics not designated as National Statistics Language: English Alternative title: YBAS

These surveys are part of Waka Kotahi's commitment to delivering Road to Zero 2020-30, New Zealand's road safety strategy.Each survey details the results of responses provided by New Zealanders to a broad range of questions focused on specific road safety topics, including attitudes to enforcement, speed, vehicle safety, impaired driving, distraction, driver fatigue and personal safety.This 17MB download contains the survey results and resources divided by year for the years 2020, 2021 & 2022.In 2020, we surveyed over 3,000 respondents in two separate questionnaire streams.In 2021, we surveyed over 1,600 respondents using CATI (computer assisted telephone interviewing).In 2022, we surveyed 3,330 people in two separate questionnaire streams. The research fieldwork was carried out between 14 July – 16 September 2022.File contents for each year:Questionnaire (docx): survey questionsTechnical report (docx): technical report with the methodology and other background information of the studyData (sav): weighted SPSS data file that can be used to conduct bespoke analysis. You will require a statistical software programme such as SPSS, Q or similar.Data dictionary (xlsx): data dictionary to assist the use of the SPSS fileData tables (xlsx): Excel cross-tabulations which are more commonly used by most research users. Report (pdf): report prepared by Waka Kotahi and Kantar Public based on the survey results.Data reuse caveatsAs per license. Additionally, we have used weightings in the data. The weightings are built into the SPSS raw data, and the tabulated excel document.Data quality statementSee the technical report file included in the zip download.Data quality caveatsThere are differences in data collection methodology over the years. Before 2020, the Ministry of Transport conducted surveys face-to-face. In 2020, the survey changed to using CATI (computer assisted telephone interviewing) due to COVID-19.

This survey examines the safety of women both inside and outside the home - perceptions of fear, sexual harassment, sexual violence, physical violence and threats by strangers, dates/boyfriends, other known men, husbands and common-law partners. The objective of this survey were to provide reliable estimates of the nature and extent of violence against women by male partners, acquaintances and strangers and to examine womens fear of violence in order to support current and future federal government activities.

The goal of this study was to test specific hypotheses illustrating the relationships among serious victimization experiences, the mental health effects of victimization, substance abuse/use, and delinquent behavior in adolescents. The study assessed familial and nonfamilial types of violence. It was designed as a telephone survey of American youth aged 12-17 living in United States households and residing with a parent or guardian. One parent or guardian in each household was interviewed briefly to establish rapport, secure permission to interview the targeted adolescent, and to ensure the collection of comparative data to examine potential nonresponse bias from households without adolescent participation. All interviews with both parents and adolescents were conducted using Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) technology. From the surveys of parents and adolescents, the principal investigators created one data file by attaching the data from the parents to the records of their respective adolescents. Adolescents were asked whether violence and drug abuse were problems in their schools and communities and what types of violence they had personally witnessed. They were also asked about other stressful events in their lives, such as the loss of a family member, divorce, unemployment, moving to a new home or school, serious illness or injury, and natural disaster. Questions regarding history of sexual assault, physical assault, and harsh physical discipline elicited a description of the event and perpetrator, extent of injuries, age at abuse, whether alcohol or drugs were involved, and who was informed of the incident. Information was also gathered on the delinquent behavior of respondents and their friends, including destruction of property, assault, theft, sexual assault, and gang activity. Other questions covered history of personal and family substance use and mental health indicators, such as major depression, post-traumatic stress disorders, weight changes, sleeping disorders, and problems concentrating. Demographic information was gathered from the adolescents on age, race, gender, number of people living in household, and grade in school. Parents were asked whether they were concerned about violent crime, affordable child care, drug abuse, educational quality, gangs, and the safety of their children at school. In addition, they were questioned about their own victimization experiences and whether they discussed personal safety issues with their children. Parents also supplied demographic information on gender, marital status, number of children, employment status, education, race, and income.

The survey charted the general health, functional ability, need for help, use of and satisfaction with social and health services, perceptions of the neighbourhood, and sense of safety and security of people living in the city of Tampere (Finland). Previous surveys were carried out in 1990 and 1993. Perceived general health and use of medicine were surveyed. The respondents were also asked whether they have a disability, injury or long-term illness, whether that disability/injury/illness limited their daily activities or work, whether they needed help at home because of it, and what kind of help they had received. Mental problems and symptoms such as insomnia, anxiety, sense of loneliness were examined. One question explored whether the respondents themselves regularly helped someone else. Use of health services was charted by asking about hospitalization spells and visits to a doctor. Satisfaction and opinions on the health and social services in Tampere were surveyed with a number of questions. Use of social services was charted by asking about the use of different services. The survey also covered opinions on the adequacy of social security. Perceptions of safety and security were charted by asking about how safe the respondents felt walking or cycling in their neighbourhood, whether they had experienced violence or threats of violence in their neighbourhood, and what kinds of other problems there were (e.g. noise, pollution). The respondents were asked to what extent certain factors caused them feelings of insecurity or uncertainty (e.g. immigrants, the unemployed, violence). They were also asked to evaluate different aspects of their neighbourhood. Background variables included the respondent's gender, age, household composition, education, economic activity and occupational status, duration of possible unemployment, and the service unit area where R lived.

This supplementary volume explores topics from the 2009/10 British Crime Survey interviews with children aged 10 to 15, providing analysis of children’s contact with and attitude to the police, experience of and attitudes to knife carrying, crime prevention behaviours, being in public spaces and access to leisure activities.

This subsample of the national crime surveys consists of data on personal and household victimization for persons aged 12 and older in 26 major United States cities in the period 1972-1975. The National Crime Surveys were designed by the Bureau of Justice Statistics to meet three primary objectives: (1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, (2) to estimate the numbers and types of crimes not reported to police, and (3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes in order to permit reliable comparisons over time and between areas. The surveys provide measures of victimization on the basis of six crimes (including attempts): rape, robbery, assault, burglary, larceny, and motor vehicle theft. The total National Crime Survey employed two distinct samples: a National Sample, and a Cities Sample. The cities sample consists of information about victimization in 26 major United States cities. The data collection was conducted by the United States Census Bureau, initial processing of the data and documentation was performed by the Data Use and Access Laboratories (DUALabs), and subsequent processing was performed by the ICPSR under grants from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). This Cities Attitude Sub-Sample study also includes information on personal attitudes and perceptions of crime and the police, the fear of crime, and the effect of this fear on behavioral patterns such as choice of shopping areas and places of entertainment. Data are provided on reasons for respondents' choice of neighborhood, and feelings about neighborhood, crime, personal safety, and the local police. Also specified are date, type, place, and nature of the incidents, injuries suffered, hospital treatment and medical expenses incurred, offender's personal profile, relationship of offender to victim, property stolen and value, items recovered and value, insurance coverage, and police report and reasons if incident was not reported to the police. Demographic items cover age, sex, marital status, race, ethnicity, education, employment, family income, and previous residence and reasons for migrating. This subsample is a one-half random sample of the Complete Sample, NATIONAL CRIME SURVEYS: CITIES, 1972-1975 (ICPSR 7658), in which an attitude questionnaire was administered. The subsample contains data from the same 26 cities that were used in the Complete Sample.

The Security Monitor (VM) is a biennial population survey into safety, victimization and disrespectful behaviour. This provides unequivocal figures on the (perception of) safety at a national level. This table focuses on the perception of (un)safety by citizens. This concerns the perception of safety in one's own neighbor and in general. The theme of disrespectful behavior is also discussed. The data are presented for the personal characteristics gender, age, migration background, level of education and also for the total. In addition, the personal characteristics of age, migration background and level of education are presented for women and men. The Safety Monitor is a random sample survey. This means that the figures shown are estimates, for which confidence margins apply. The symmetrical 95% confidence margins are also included in the table. If margins are less than 0 or greater than 100, they will be truncated to 0 or 100, respectively. Figures refer to individuals aged 15 and over, unless otherwise stated. The survey was conducted in the period August-November. Status of the figures: The figures in this table are final. Change as of November 30, 2022: None, this table has been discontinued. Change as of November 27, 2020: The figures for 2019 have been added. When the figures (2012-2017) were read in, a number of topics were shifted in the previous version, as a result of which the data were incorrect. It concerns the topics of perception of insecurity/general/chance of victimization -of pickpocketing -of robbery in the street -of burglary at home -of abuse perception of insecurity/neighbourhood -sometimes feels unsafe in the neighborhood -often feels unsafe in the neighborhood -acts at night not open -Drives or runs around That has been corrected in this version Changes as of December 18, 2019: The table has been supplemented with the feature “Position in the household” When will new figures be released? Not applicable anymore.

The global market for Medical Radiation Detection, Monitoring, and Safety Equipment is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing adoption of advanced imaging technologies in healthcare, stringent regulatory requirements for radiation safety, and rising awareness of radiation risks among healthcare professionals and patients. The market size in 2025 is estimated at $2.5 billion, with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7% projected from 2025 to 2033. This growth is fueled by several key trends, including the development of more sophisticated and portable radiation detection devices, increasing demand for real-time radiation monitoring systems in hospitals and research facilities, and a growing focus on personalized radiation therapy. Furthermore, technological advancements like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of radiation detection and safety equipment, further stimulating market expansion. While the market faces restraints such as high initial investment costs for advanced equipment and potential regulatory hurdles in certain regions, the overall growth trajectory remains positive. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established multinational corporations and specialized smaller players. Key players like Mirion Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Fortive Corporation hold significant market share due to their strong brand reputation, extensive product portfolios, and global distribution networks. However, smaller, innovative companies are also contributing significantly to market growth through the introduction of niche products and technological advancements. Geographic expansion, particularly in emerging economies with developing healthcare infrastructure, presents substantial opportunities for market players. The market segmentation is influenced by equipment type (e.g., dosimeters, survey meters, personal protective equipment), application (e.g., diagnostic radiology, radiotherapy, nuclear medicine), and end-user (e.g., hospitals, research institutions, regulatory agencies). Continuous advancements in radiation detection technology, coupled with increasing regulatory scrutiny, will further shape the market dynamics in the coming years.

This guide is for cycle 13 of the General Social Survey (GSS). Cycle 13 is the third cycle (following cycles 3 and 8) that collected information in 1999 on the nature and extent of criminal victimisation in Canada. Focus content for cycle 13 addressed two areas of emerging interest: public perception toward alternatives to imprisonment; and spousal violence and senior abuse. Other subjects common to all three cycles include perceptions of crime, police and courts; crime prevention precautions; accident and crime screening sections; and accident and crime incident reports. The target population of the GSS is all individuals aged 15 and over living in a private household in one of the ten provinces.

This table provides data on the perception of (un)safety and the assessment of crime and safety by residents of the Caribbean Netherlands aged 15 years and older in private households. It concerns the perception of safety in general and the assessment of crime in one’s own neighbourhood. Breakdowns by sex, age and level of education are presented. These aspects are shown for the Caribbean Netherlands and also for the islands Bonaire, St Eustatius and Saba separately. The research is a sample survey. This means that the figures shown are estimates for which reliability margins apply. These margins are also included in the table. The Omnibus survey was carried out for the first time on Bonaire, Saba and St. Eustatius in 2013 during the month of June and the first week of July. For the second time the Omnibus survey was carried out on Bonaire during the months of October and November 2017, and on Saba and St. Eustatius in the period January to March 2018.

Data available from: 2013

Status of the figures: The figures in this table are final.

Changes as of 4 April 2019 None, this is a new table.

When will new figures be published? New data will be published every four years.

Interactions with flying foxes pose disease transmission risks to volunteer rehabilitators (carers) who treat injured, ill, and orphaned bats. In particular, Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV) can be transmitted directly from flying foxes to humans in Australia. Personal protective equipment (PPE) and rabies vaccination can be used to protect against lyssavirus infection. During May and June 2014, active Australian flying fox carers participated in an online survey (SOAR: Survey Of Australian flying fox Rehabilitators) designed to gather demographic data, assess perceptions of disease risk, and explore safety practices. Responses to open-ended questions were analysed thematically. A logistic regression was performed to assess whether rehabilitators’ gender, use of PPE, threat perception, and years of experience predicted variation in their odds of being bitten or scratched. Eligible responses were received from 122 rehabilitators located predominantly on the eastern coast of Australia. Eighty-four percent of respondents were female. Years of experience ranged from <1 to 30 years (median 5 years). Respondents were highly educated. All rehabilitators were vaccinated against rabies and 94% received a rabies titre check at least every two years. Sixty-three percent of carers did not perceive viruses in flying foxes as a potential threat to their health, yet 74% of carers reported using PPE when handling flying foxes. Eighty-three percent of rehabilitators had received a flying fox bite or scratch at some point during their career. Carers provide an important community service by rescuing and rehabilitating flying foxes. While rehabilitators in this study have many excellent safety practices, including a 100% vaccination rate against rabies, there is room for improvement in PPE use. We recommend 1) the establishment of an Australia-wide set of guidelines for safety when caring for bats and 2) that the responsible government agencies in Australia support carers who rescue potentially ABLV-infected bats by offering compensation for PPE.