Map of election districts in Monmouth County with polling locations.

This webmap demarcates municipal voting districts in Allegheny County. If viewing this description on the Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center’s open data portal (http://www.wprdc.org), this dataset is harvested on a weekly basis from Allegheny County’s GIS data portal (http://openac.alcogis.opendata.arcgis.com/). The full metadata record for this dataset can also be found on Allegheny County’s GIS portal. You can access the metadata record and other resources on the GIS portal by clicking on the “Explore” button (and choosing the “Go to resource” option) to the right of the “ArcGIS Open Dataset” text below. Category: Civic Vitality and Governance Organization: Allegheny County Department: Elections Division; Department of Administrative Services Temporal Coverage: 2016 Data Notes: Coordinate System: Pennsylvania State Plane South Zone 3702; U.S. Survey Foot Development Notes: County staff scanned original court maps into the GIS and rubber-sheeted them to fit the Allegheny County GIS Base Data developed from a flyover in 1992-93. Other: none Related Document(s): Data Dictionary (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HR24LyBNpLwvJZoaGp-tBGRw0HRoXNIef6nU4UQQMMo/edit?usp=sharing) Frequency - Data Change: As needed Frequency - Publishing: As needed Data Steward Name: Eli Thomas Data Steward Email: gishelp@alleghenycounty.us

Surveys from swing states conducted the day before the 2024 election indicated an extremely close contest between Trump and Harris. Trump held a slight lead over of Harris in the majority of swing states.

The typical statewide or county-wide red/blue map (shown at left) depicts presidential voting results on a winner-take-all basis, so they award an entire geographical area to the Republican or Democratic candidate no matter how close the actual vote tally The large map in the attachment factors in both the percentage of the popular vote won by each candidate as well as the population density of each county. So, the sparsely populated Great Plains and Rocky Mountain West are shown in a much lighter color than the Eastern Seaboard, and the map as a whole is more purple than either red or blue. Perhaps the United States is less divided than some maps would lead us to believe.

Suburban Cook County Election Precincts maintained by the Cook County Clerk's Election Department. Not included are the City of Chicago Election Precincts which are maintained by the Chicago Board Of Elections. An ArcGIS Service is available at: https://hub-cookcountyil.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/0e91b48d49744346be343f0cb99d25bd_0/

Voting District Project of the Census Redistricting Data Program commenced in Summer of 2017 to establish the state’s Voting precincts within the bureau’s tiger geography. The initial phase used the Bureau’s GUPS plugin for QGIS to update the districts from the 2010 round, and then a secondary verification phase took place to ensure the updated voting districts were properly enacted into Tiger geographic files. A post census effort took place in December 2021 to cut the number of precincts down countywide to 1430. Election Data Services conducted Phase 2 of the Census Redistricting Data Program for the State of Illinois, as well as implemented changes made post census in Cook County.

Precincts are updated as needed before every election by the Cook County Clerk's Elections Department.

According to exit polling in ten key states of the 2024 presidential election in the United States, almost two-thirds of voters who had never attended college reported voting for Donald Trump. In comparison, a similar share of voters with advanced degrees reported voting for Kamala Harris.

This dataset contains the Polling Place locations in suburban Cook County for the 2016 Presidential Primary Election on March 15. For more information on Polling Locations see http://www.cookcountyclerk.com/elections/pollinglocations/Pages/default.aspx

4.3. Election map data by voting district in the Presidential election 2018, first round, Oulu.

A map used in the Election Polling Places application to locate the polling place where ballots can be cast on Election Day.

According to exit polling in ten key states of the 2024 presidential election in the United States, 57 percent of surveyed white voters reported voting for Donald Trump. In contrast, 85 percent of Black voters reported voting for Kamala Harris.

4.1. Election map data by voting district in the Presidential election 2018, first round, Greater Helsinki region.

These polling place locations are from the North Carolina State Board of Elections at https://www.ncsbe.gov. It depicts polling places for all 100 counties in NC.

Every four years in the United States, the electoral college system is used to determine the winner of the presidential election. In this system, each state has a fixed number of electors based on their population size, and (generally speaking) these electors then vote for their candidate with the most popular votes within their state or district. Since 1964, there have been 538 electoral votes available for presidential candidates, who need a minimum of 270 votes to win the election. Because of this system, candidates do not have to win over fifty percent of the popular votes across the country, but just win in enough states to receive a total of 270 electoral college votes. The use of this system is a source of debate in the U.S.; those in favor claim that it prevents candidates from focusing on the interests of urban populations, and must also appeal to smaller and less-populous states, and they say that this system preserves federalism and the two-party system. However, critics argue that this system does not represent the will of the majority of American voters, and that it encourages candidates to disproportionally focus on winning in swing states, where the outcome is more difficult to predict. Popular results From 1789 until 1820, there was no popular vote, and the President was then chosen only by the electors from each state. George Washington was unanimously voted for by the electorate, receiving one hundred percent of the votes in both elections. From 1824, the popular vote has been conducted among American citizens, to help electors decide who to vote for (although the 1824 winner was chosen by the House of Representatives, as no candidate received over fifty percent of electoral votes). Since 1924, the difference in the share of both votes has varied, with several candidates receiving over ninety percent of the electoral votes while only receiving between fifty and sixty percent of the popular vote. The highest difference was for Ronald Reagan in 1980, where he received just 50.4 percent of the popular vote, but 90.9 percent of the electoral votes. Unpopular winners Since 1824, there have been 49 elections, and in 18 of these the winner did not receive over fifty percent of the popular vote. In the majority of these cases, the winner did receive a plurality of the votes, however there have been five instances where the winner of the electoral college vote lost the popular vote to another candidate. The most recent examples of this were in 2000, when George W. Bush received roughly half a million fewer votes than Al Gore, and in 2016, where Hillary Clinton won approximately three million more votes than Donald Trump.

This service contains infromation for polling places, voting precincts and Town of Cary Council Members.

When the districts running on a particular election ballot are identical for 2-6 adjacent regular precincts, California Election Code 12241 allows for those precincts to be consolidated. In Sacramento County it is policy that the consolidated precinct will bear the lowest precinct number of the original regular precincts. Through the 2016 elections, consolidated precincts with 250 or more registered voters were assigned a polling place and designated "Polling Place" precincts. Consolidated precincts with less than 250 registered voters were designated "Mail Ballot" precincts. For every Polling Place Precinct there also existed a coextensive "Vote by Mail" precinct for the registered voters of that precinct who voted by mail. Since the 2018 elections, there is no longer a distinction between "Polling Place" precincts and "Mail Ballot" precincts. All Consolidated Precincts also have a corresponding and coextensive "Vote by Mail" precinct. Because the combination of contests on ballot is unique to a particular election, the set of consolidated precincts is unique to that particular election.Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

4.4. Election map data by voting district in the Presidential election 2018, first round, Turku.

Election Maps - Statewide

4.2. Election map data by voting district in the Presidential election 2012, first round, Tampere.

4.7. Election map data by voting district in the Parliamentary elections 2015, Lahti.

County of Berks - Election Services Department Precinct Map that depicts precinct boundary extents and polling place details.