Overview

Empower your location data visualizations with our edge-matched polygons, even in difficult geographies.

Our self-hosted GIS data cover administrative and postal divisions with up to 6 precision levels: a zip code layer and up to 5 administrative levels. All levels follow a seamless hierarchical structure with no gaps or overlaps.

The geospatial data shapes are offered in high-precision and visualization resolution and are easily customized on-premise.

Use cases for the Global Boundaries Database (GIS data, Geospatial data)

• In-depth spatial analysis

• Clustering

• Geofencing

• Reverse Geocoding

• Reporting and Business Intelligence (BI)

Product Features

• Coherence and precision at every level

• Edge-matched polygons

• High-precision shapes for spatial analysis

• Fast-loading polygons for reporting and BI

• Multi-language support

For additional insights, you can combine the GIS data with:

• Population data: Historical and future trends

• UNLOCODE and IATA codes

• Time zones and Daylight Saving Time (DST)

Data export methodology

Our geospatial data packages are offered in variable formats, including - .shp - .gpkg - .kml - .shp - .gpkg - .kml - .geojson

All GIS data are optimized for seamless integration with popular systems like Esri ArcGIS, Snowflake, QGIS, and more.

Why companies choose our map data

• Precision at every level

• Coverage of difficult geographies

• No gaps, nor overlaps

Note: Custom geospatial data packages are available. Please submit a request via the above contact button for more details.

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) Hazardous Waste Site Polygon Data with CIESIN Modifications, Version 2 is a database providing georeferenced data for 1,572 National Priorities List (NPL) Superfund sites. These were selected from the larger set of the ATSDR Hazardous Waste Site Polygon Data, Version 2 data set with polygons from May 26, 2010. The modified data set contains only sites that have been proposed, currently on, or deleted from the final NPL as of October 25, 2013. Of the 2,080 ATSDR polygons from 2010, 1,575 were NPL sites but three sites were excluded - 2 in the Virgin Islands and 1 in Guam. This data set is modified by the Columbia University Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). The modified polygon database includes all the attributes for these NPL sites provided in the ATSDR GRASP Hazardous Waste Site Polygon database and selected attributes from the EPA List 9 Active CERCLIS sites and SCAP 12 NPL sites databases. These polygons represent sites considered for cleanup under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). The Geospatial Research, Analysis, and Services Program (GRASP, Division of Health Studies, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) has created site boundary data using the best available information for those sites where health assessments or consultations have been requested.

Overview

Empower your location data visualizations with our edge-matched polygons, even in difficult geographies.

Our self-hosted geospatial data cover postal divisions for the whole world. The geospatial data shapes are offered in high-precision and visualization resolution and are easily customized on-premise.

Use cases for the Global Boundaries Database (Geospatial data, Map data, Polygon daa)

• In-depth spatial analysis

• Clustering

• Geofencing

• Reverse Geocoding

• Reporting and Business Intelligence (BI)

Product Features

• Coherence and precision at every level

• Edge-matched polygons

• High-precision shapes for spatial analysis

• Fast-loading polygons for reporting and BI

• Multi-language support

For additional insights, you can combine the map data with:

• Population data: Historical and future trends

• UNLOCODE and IATA codes

• Time zones and Daylight Saving Time (DST)

Data export methodology

Our location data packages are offered in variable formats, including - .shp - .gpkg - .kml - .shp - .gpkg - .kml - .geojson

All geospatial data are optimized for seamless integration with popular systems like Esri ArcGIS, Snowflake, QGIS, and more.

Why companies choose our map data

• Precision at every level

• Coverage of difficult geographies

• No gaps, nor overlaps

Note: Custom geospatial data packages are available. Please submit a request via the above contact button for more details.

This specialized location dataset delivers detailed information about marina establishments. Maritime industry professionals, coastal planners, and tourism researchers can leverage precise location insights to understand maritime infrastructure, analyze recreational boating landscapes, and develop targeted strategies.

How Do We Create Polygons? -All our polygons are manually crafted using advanced GIS tools like QGIS, ArcGIS, and similar applications. This involves leveraging aerial imagery and street-level views to ensure precision. -Beyond visual data, our expert GIS data engineers integrate venue layout/elevation plans sourced from official company websites to construct detailed indoor polygons. This meticulous process ensures higher accuracy and consistency. -We verify our polygons through multiple quality checks, focusing on accuracy, relevance, and completeness.

What's More? -Custom Polygon Creation: Our team can build polygons for any location or category based on your specific requirements. Whether it’s a new retail chain, transportation hub, or niche point of interest, we’ve got you covered. -Enhanced Customization: In addition to polygons, we capture critical details such as entry and exit points, parking areas, and adjacent pathways, adding greater context to your geospatial data. -Flexible Data Delivery Formats: We provide datasets in industry-standard formats like WKT, GeoJSON, Shapefile, and GDB, making them compatible with various systems and tools. -Regular Data Updates: Stay ahead with our customizable refresh schedules, ensuring your polygon data is always up-to-date for evolving business needs.

Unlock the Power of POI and Geospatial Data With our robust polygon datasets and point-of-interest data, you can: -Perform detailed market analyses to identify growth opportunities. -Pinpoint the ideal location for your next store or business expansion. -Decode consumer behavior patterns using geospatial insights. -Execute targeted, location-driven marketing campaigns for better ROI. -Gain an edge over competitors by leveraging geofencing and spatial intelligence.

Why Choose LocationsXYZ? LocationsXYZ is trusted by leading brands to unlock actionable business insights with our spatial data solutions. Join our growing network of successful clients who have scaled their operations with precise polygon and POI data. Request your free sample today and explore how we can help accelerate your business growth.

This geodatabase of point, line and polygon features is an effort to consolidate all of the range improvement locations on BLM-managed land in Idaho into one database. Currently, the polygon feature class has some data for all of the BLM field offices except the Coeur d'Alene and Cottonwood field offices. Range improvements are structures intended to enhance rangeland resources, including wildlife, watershed, and livestock management. Examples of range improvements include water troughs, spring headboxes, culverts, fences, water pipelines, gates, wildlife guzzlers, artificial nest structures, reservoirs, developed springs, corrals, exclosures, etc. These structures were first tracked by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in the Job Documentation Report (JDR) System in the early 1960s, which was predominately a paper-based tracking system. In 1988 the JDRs were migrated into and replaced by the automated Range Improvement Project System (RIPS), and version 2.0 is currently being used today. It tracks inventory, status, objectives, treatment, maintenance cycle, maintenance inspection, monetary contributions and reporting. Not all range improvements are documented in the RIPS database; there may be some older range improvements that were built before the JDR tracking system was established. There also may be unauthorized projects that are not in RIPS. Official project files of paper maps, reports, NEPA documents, checklists, etc., document the status of each project and are physically kept in the office with management authority for that project area. In addition, project data is entered into the RIPS system to enable managers to access the data to track progress, run reports, analyze the data, etc. Before Geographic Information System technology most offices kept paper atlases or overlay systems that mapped the locations of the range improvements. The objective of this geodatabase is to migrate the location of historic range improvement projects into a GIS for geospatial use with other data and to centralize the range improvement data for the state. This data set is a work in progress and does not have all range improvement projects that are on BLM lands. Some field offices have not migrated their data into this database, and others are partially completed. New projects may have been built but have not been entered into the system. Historic or unauthorized projects may not have case files and are being mapped and documented as they are found. Many field offices are trying to verify the locations and status of range improvements with GPS, and locations may change or projects that have been abandoned or removed on the ground may be deleted. Attributes may be incomplete or inaccurate. This data was created using the standard for range improvements set forth in Idaho IM 2009-044, dated 6/30/2009. However, it does not have all of the fields the standard requires. Fields that are missing from the polygon feature class that are in the standard are: ALLOT_NO, POLY_TYPE, MGMT_AGCY, ADMIN_ST, and ADMIN_OFF. The polygon feature class also does not have a coincident line feature class, so some of the fields from the polygon arc feature class are included in the polygon feature class: COORD_SRC, COORD_SRC2, DEF_FET, DEF_FEAT2, ACCURACY, CREATE_DT, CREATE_BY, MODIFY_DT, MODIFY_BY, GPS_DATE, and DATAFILE. There is no National BLM standard for GIS range improvement data at this time.

Geophysics that are shown as polygons. Sometimes the real position of geophysical lines cannot be shown because of confidentiality reasons and in this case a polygon that shows the approximate location is used instead. In other cases the geophysics is best represented by a polygon – for example for 3D seismic surveys.

BodyParts3D organ model data with the polygon reduction rate of 99%. The zip-compressed download files contain multiple files of ELEMENT file ID-specific polygon data in Wavefront OBJ format.

HARV_POLY: This dataset represents completed harvest land treatments on BLM managed lands in the states of Oregon and Washington. Harvest treatments are the cutting and removal or trees or biomass.

New York City’s comprehensive effort to reduce or eliminate potential losses from the hazards described in the Hazard Specific section of the website. The map includes existing and completed mitigation actions that will minimize the effects of a hazard event on New York City’s population, economy, property, building stock, and infrastructure. It is the result of a coordinated effort by 46 New York City agencies and partners to develop and implement a broad range of inventive and effective ways to mitigate hazards. Point, line, polygon features and a table for the Mitigation Actions map on the Hazard Mitigation website: www.nychazardmitigation.com/all-hazards/mitigation/actions-map/

The hydrographic polygon coverages were created using TIGER/LINE 2000 shapefile data gathered from ESRI's Geography Network. The individual county hydrography line shapefiles were processed into Arc/Info coverages and then appended together to create complete state coverages. They were then edited to remove unwanted features, leaving a state-by-state database of both important and navigable water features. Attributes were added to denote navigable features and names. Also, an attribute was added to the polygons to denote which were water and which were land features. The state databases were then appended together to create a single, nationwide hydrography network containing named arcs and polygons. These features also contain a state FIPS. Because some of the hydro features are represented by lines instead of polygons, the complete hydro dataset consists of 2 shapefiles, one for lines and one for polygons. They must be used together to paint a complete picture.

© US Census and ESRI This layer is sourced from maps.bts.dot.gov.

The hydrographic polygon coverages (NTAD 2015) were created using TIGER/LINE 2000 shapefile data gathered from ESRI's Geography Network. The individual county hydrography line shapefiles were processed into Arc/Info coverages and then appended together to create complete state coverages. They were then edited to remove unwanted features, leaving a state-by-state database of both important and navigable water features. Attributes were added to denote navigable features and names. Also, an attribute was added to the polygons to denote which were water and which were land features. The state databases were then appended together to create a single, nationwide hydrography network containing named arcs and polygons. These features also contain a state FIPS. Because some of the hydro features are represented by lines instead of polygons, the complete hydro dataset consists of 2 shapefiles, one for lines and one for polygons. They must be used together to paint a complete picture.

© US Census and ESRI

Comprehensive global POI data and polygon datasets featuring 6M+ worldwide locations across 11 industries. Includes international location data with detailed geospatial coverage and custom geofence insights. Ideal for global market analysis and international expansion across multiple countries.

The reference spatial database for 2019 contains 5142 plots. We use it to calculate a land use map from satellite images. It is organized according to a nested 3-level nomenclature. This is an update of the 2018 database. The sources and techniques used to build the database by land use groups are described below: For agricultural areas, we use a land use database based on farmers' declarations (for EU subsidies). This is the "Registre Parcellaire Graphique" (RPG) published in France by the French Institute for Geographical and Forestry Informations (IGN). The description of this data is available here: http://professionnels.ign.fr/doc/DC_DL_RPG-2-0.pdf. These vector data localize the crops. The release times imply that we use the RPG for last year (2018). It is therefore necessary to verify the good coherence of the data with the image at very high spatial resolution (VHSR) Pleiades. The RPG provides little information on arboriculture. For these classes we called on colleagues specialized in mango, lychee and citrus crops who are familiar with their area and can locate plots in the VHSR image. The plots of the "greenhouse or shade cultivation" class are derived from the "industrial building" layer of the IGN's "BD Topo" product. A random selection of 20% of the polygons in the layer height field allows to keep a diversity of greenhouse types. Each polygon was verified by photo-interpretation of the Pleiades image. If the greenhouse or shade was not visible in the image, the polygon was removed. The distinction between mowed and grazed grasslands was completed through collaboration with colleagues from the SELMET joint research unit (Emmanuel Tillard, Expédit Rivière, Colas Gabriel Tovmassian and Jeanne Averna). For natural areas , there is no regularly updated mapping, but the main classes can be recognized from the GIS layers of government departments that manage these areas (ONF and DEAL). Two specific classes have been added (identified by photo-interpretation): a class of shadows due to the island's steep relief (areas not visible because of the cast shade) and a class of vegetation located on steep slopes facing the morning sun called "rampart moor". The polygons for the distinction of savannahs have been improved thanks to the knowledge of Xavier Amelot (CNRS), Béatrice Moppert and Quentin Rivière (University of La Réunion). For wet land areas , the "marsh" and "water" classes were obtained by photo-interpretation of the 2019 Pleiades image. These classes are easily recognizable on this type of image. For urban areas we randomly selected polygons from the IGN BD Topo product. For the housing type building, 4 building height classes have previously been created (depending on the height of the layer field) in order to preserve a good diversity of the types of buildings present on the island. A random selection of polygons from each class was then made. The "built" layer was completed by a random selection of industrial buildings from the "industrial built" layer of the IGN's BD TOPO product. This selection was made in the "nature" field of the layer (i‧e. the following types: silo, industrial and livestock). The "photovoltaic panel" class was obtained by photo-interpretation of the polygons on 2019 Pleiades image. La base de données spatiale de référence pour 2019, est constituée de 5142 polygones. Nous l'utilisons pour calculer une carte d'occupation du sol à partir d'images satellites. Elle est organisée selon une nomenclature emboitée à 3 niveaux. Il s'agit d'une mise à jour de la base de données pour 2018. Voici une brève description des sources et techniques utilisées pour la constituer en fonction des groupes d’occupation du sol : Pour les espaces agricoles , nous disposons d’une base de données d’occupation du sol basée sur les déclarations que font des agriculteurs pour demander les subventions de l’Union Européenne. Il s’agit du Registre Parcellaire Graphique (RPG) diffusé en France par l’Institut français de l’information géographique et forestière (IGN). La description de cette donnée est disponible ici : http://professionnels.ign.fr/doc/DC_DL_RPG-2-0.pdf. Ces données vecteur sont précises et peuvent servir de modèle pour localiser les cultures. Les délais de diffusion impliquent que nous utilisons le RPG de l’année N -1. Il est donc nécessaire de vérifier la bonne cohérence des données par photo-interprétation de l’image THRS. Le RPG fournit peu d’informations sur l’arboriculture. Pour ces classes nous avons fait appel aux collègues techniciens spécialisés dans les cultures de mangues, litchis et agrumes qui connaissent bien leur secteur et peuvent localiser des parcelles sur l’image THRS. Les parcelles de la classe « culture sous serre ou ombrage » sont issues de la couche « bâti industriel » de la BD Topo de l’IGN. Une sélection aléatoire de 20% des polygones dans le champ hauteur de la couche de l’IGN permet de conserver une diversité des types de serre. Chacun des polygones...

geodata data package providing geojson polygons for all the world's countries

A Research Polygon is a feature representing a geographic area (polygon), where some form of research observation, test, trial, measure, or monitoring activity has, or will take place. The mapped features in this layer can be derived existing feature geometry (e.g. plantation), or as generated feature geometry (e.g., 11.28 meter diameter circular plot around a centre post). This layer will also store research areas which represent formalized groupings where research occurs. There will be significant overlaps between features in this layer. This data class is one of three primitive data classes: Research Point (RESPOINT), Research Line (RESLINE), and Research Polygon (RESPOLY).

Additional DocumentationResearch Polygon - Data Description (PDF)Research Polygon - Documentation (Word) Research Plot - User Guide (Word) Research Plot - FAQ (Word)

Status

On going: data is being continually updated

Maintenance and Update Frequency

As needed: data is updated as deemed necessary

Contact

Adam Hogg, adam.hogg@ontario.ca

The data referenced here is licensed under the Ontario Geospatial Data Exchange (OGDE) Agreement and is available to members of the OGDE for professional, non-commercial use only. To find out more about the OGDE visit Land Information Ontario on Ontario.ca.

The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) is the most comprehensive global database of marine and terrestrial protected areas and is one of the key global biodiversity datasets being widely used by scientists, businesses, governments, International secretariats and others to inform planning, policy decisions and management.The WDPA is a joint project between the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The compilation and management of the WDPA is carried out by UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), in collaboration with governments, non-governmental organisations, academia and industry. There are monthly updates of the data which are made available online through the Protected Planet website where the data is both viewable and downloadable.Data and information on the world's protected areas compiled in the WDPA are used for reporting to the Convention on Biological Diversity on progress towards reaching the Aichi Biodiversity Targets (particularly Target 11), to the UN to track progress towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, to some of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) core indicators, and other international assessments and reports including the Global Biodiversity Outlook, as well as for the publication of the United Nations List of Protected Areas. Every two years, UNEP-WCMC releases the Protected Planet Report on the status of the world's protected areas and recommendations on how to meet international goals and targets.Many platforms are incorporating the WDPA to provide integrated information to diverse users, including businesses and governments, in a range of sectors including mining, oil and gas, and finance. For example, the WDPA is included in the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool, an innovative decision support tool that gives users easy access to up-to-date information that allows them to identify biodiversity risks and opportunities within a project boundary.The reach of the WDPA is further enhanced in services developed by other parties, such as theGlobal Forest Watch and the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas, which provide decision makers with access to monitoring and alert systems that allow whole landscapes to be managed better. Together, these applications of the WDPA demonstrate the growing value and significance of the Protected Planet initiative.For more details on the WDPA please read through the WDPA User Manual.

This cadastral polygon dataset is a digital representation of all land parcel boundaries within Western Australia. It represents all crown land (land owned by the State) and freehold land (land held in fee simple) and is sourced from the Spatial Cadastral Database (SCDB) which is the official digital cadastral map base of all crown and freehold land parcels within the State of Western Australia. The dataset covers the State of Western Australia and the Commonwealth jurisdictions of Cocos Keeling Island and Christmas Island. NOTE: This product is for information purposes only and is not guaranteed. The information may be out of date and should not be relied upon without further verification from the original documents. Where the information is being used for legal purposes then the original documents must be searched for all legal requirements. © Western Australian Land Information Authority (Landgate). Use of Landgate data is subject to Personal Use License terms and conditions unless otherwise authorised under approved License terms and conditions. For further information please contact your Landgate Service Manager or email BusinessSolutions@landgate.wa.gov.au.

description: This data represents the GIS Version of the Public Land Survey System including both rectangular and non-rectangular survey data. The rectangular survey data are a reference system for land tenure based upon meridian, township/range, section, section subdivision and government lots. The non-rectangular survey data represent surveys that were largely performed to protect and/or convey title on specific parcels of land such as mineral surveys and tracts. The data are largely complete in reference to the rectangular survey data at the level of first division. However, the data varies in terms of granularity of its spatial representation as well as its content below the first division. Therefore, depending upon the data source and steward, accurate subdivision of the rectangular data may not be available below the first division and the non-rectangular minerals surveys may not be present. At times, the complexity of surveys rendered the collection of data cost prohibitive such as in areas characterized by numerous, overlapping mineral surveys. In these situations, the data were often not abstracted or were only partially abstracted and incorporated into the data set. These PLSS data were compiled from a broad spectrum or sources including federal, county, and private survey records such as field notes and plats as well as map sources such as USGS 7 minute quadrangles. The metadata in each data set describes the production methods for the data content. This data is optimized for data publication and sharing rather than for specific "production" or operation and maintenance. A complete PLSS data set includes the following: PLSS Townships, First Divisions and Second Divisions (the hierarchical break down of the PLSS Rectangular surveys) PLSS Special surveys (non-rectangular components of the PLSS) Meandered Water, Corners, Metadata at a Glance (which identified last revised date and data steward) and Conflicted Areas (known areas of gaps or overlaps or inconsistencies). The Entity-Attribute section of this metadata describes these components in greater detail. This is a graphic representation of the data stewards based on PLSS Townships in PLSS areas. In non-PLSS areas the metadata at a glance is based on a data steward defined polygons such as a city or county or other units. The identification of the data steward is a general indication of the agency that will be responsible for updates and providing the authoritative data sources. In other implementations this may have been termed the alternate source, meaning alternate to the BLM. But in the shared environment of the NSDI the data steward for an area is the primary coordinator or agency responsible for making updates or causing updates to be made. The data stewardship polygons are defined and provided by the data steward.; abstract: This data represents the GIS Version of the Public Land Survey System including both rectangular and non-rectangular survey data. The rectangular survey data are a reference system for land tenure based upon meridian, township/range, section, section subdivision and government lots. The non-rectangular survey data represent surveys that were largely performed to protect and/or convey title on specific parcels of land such as mineral surveys and tracts. The data are largely complete in reference to the rectangular survey data at the level of first division. However, the data varies in terms of granularity of its spatial representation as well as its content below the first division. Therefore, depending upon the data source and steward, accurate subdivision of the rectangular data may not be available below the first division and the non-rectangular minerals surveys may not be present. At times, the complexity of surveys rendered the collection of data cost prohibitive such as in areas characterized by numerous, overlapping mineral surveys. In these situations, the data were often not abstracted or were only partially abstracted and incorporated into the data set. These PLSS data were compiled from a broad spectrum or sources including federal, county, and private survey records such as field notes and plats as well as map sources such as USGS 7 minute quadrangles. The metadata in each data set describes the production methods for the data content. This data is optimized for data publication and sharing rather than for specific "production" or operation and maintenance. A complete PLSS data set includes the following: PLSS Townships, First Divisions and Second Divisions (the hierarchical break down of the PLSS Rectangular surveys) PLSS Special surveys (non-rectangular components of the PLSS) Meandered Water, Corners, Metadata at a Glance (which identified last revised date and data steward) and Conflicted Areas (known areas of gaps or overlaps or inconsistencies). The Entity-Attribute section of this metadata describes these components in greater detail. This is a graphic representation of the data stewards based on PLSS Townships in PLSS areas. In non-PLSS areas the metadata at a glance is based on a data steward defined polygons such as a city or county or other units. The identification of the data steward is a general indication of the agency that will be responsible for updates and providing the authoritative data sources. In other implementations this may have been termed the alternate source, meaning alternate to the BLM. But in the shared environment of the NSDI the data steward for an area is the primary coordinator or agency responsible for making updates or causing updates to be made. The data stewardship polygons are defined and provided by the data steward.

Water quality in the Barnegat Bay estuary along the New Jersey coast is the focus of a multidisciplinary research project begun in 2011 by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in cooperation with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. This narrow estuary is the drainage for the Barnegat Bay watershed and flushed by just three inlets connecting it to the Atlantic Ocean, is experiencing degraded water quality, algal blooms, loss of seagrass, and increases in oxygen-depletion events. The scale of the estuary and the scope of the problems within it required a regional approach to understand and model water circulation within the bay and adjacent ocean. A continuous elevation surface (terrain model) integrating all available elevation data in the area was produced for the water circulation modeling efforts.

This dataset represents the GIS Version of the Public Land Survey System including both rectangular and non-rectangular surveys. The primary source for the data is cadastral survey records housed by the BLM supplemented with local records and geographic control coordinates from states, counties as well as other federal agencies such as the USGS and USFS. The data has been converted from source documents to digital form and transferred into a GIS format that is compliant with FGDC Cadastral Data Content Standards and Guidelines for publication. This data is optimized for data publication and sharing rather than for specific 'production' or operation and maintenance. This data set includes the following: PLSS Fully Intersected (all of the PLSS feature at the atomic or smallest polygon level), PLSS Townships, First Divisions and Second Divisions (the hierarchical break down of the PLSS Rectangular surveys), and the Bureau of Census 2015 Cartographic State Boundaries. The Entity-Attribute section of this metadata describes these components in greater detail. Please note that the data on this site, although published at regular intervals, may not be the most current PLSS data that is available from the BLM. Updates to the PLSS data at the BLM State Offices may have occurred since this data was published. To ensure users have the most current data, please contact the BLM PLSS Data Set Manager.

The Capital Projects Database reports information at the project level on discrete capital investments from the Capital Commitment Plan.Each row is uniquely identified by its Financial Management Service (FMS) ID, and contains data pertaining to the sponsoring and managing agency. To explore the data, please visit Capital Planning Explorer For additional information, please visit A Guide to The Capital Budget