This webmap is a subset of Global Urban Density Footprint in 2020 Tile Image Layer. This layer represents an estimate of the footprint of urban settings in 2020. It is intended as a fast-drawing cartographic layer to augment base maps and to focus a map reader's attention on the location of human population. This layer is not intended for analysis. This layer was derived from the 2020 slice of the WorldPop Population Density 2000-2020 100m and 1km layers.Also see the Populated Footprint layer, which like this layer, is intended to provide a fast-drawing cartographic context for the footprint of total population.The following processing steps were used to produce this layer in ArcGIS Pro:1. Int tool (Spatial Analyst) to truncate double precision values; all values less than 0.99 become 0.2. Reclassify tool (Spatial Analyst) to set values 0 through 1499 to NoData (Null) and all other values become 1.3. Copy Raster tool with Output Coordinate System environment set to Web Mercator, bit depth to 1 bit, and NoData Value to 0.Source:WorldPop Population Density 2000-2020 100m, which is created from WorldPop (www.worldpop.org - School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton; Department of Geography and Geosciences, University of Louisville; Departement de Geographie, Universite de Namur) and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University (2018). Global High Resolution Population Denominators Project - Funded by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The DOI for the original WorldPop.org total population population data is 10.5258/SOTON/WP00645.

This layer is a subset of World Populated Footprint in 2020 Tile Image Layer.This layer represents an estimate of the footprint of human settlement in 2020. It is intended as a fast-drawing cartographic layer to augment base maps and to focus a map reader's attention on the location of human population. This layer is not intended for analysis.This layer was derived from the 2020 slice of the WorldPop Population Density 2000-2020 100m and 1km layers. WorldPop modeled this population footprint based on imagery datasets and population data from national statistical organizations and the United Nations. Zooming in to very large scales will often show discrepancies between reality and this or any model. Like all data sources imagery and population counts are subject to many types of error, thus this gridded footprint contains errors of omission and commission. The imagery base maps available in ArcGIS Online were not used in WorldPop's model. Imagery only informs the model of characteristics that indicate a potential for settlement, and cannot intrinsically indicate whether any or how many people live in a building. Also see the Urban Density Footprint layer, which like this layer, is intended to provide a fast-drawing cartographic context for urban populations.The following processing steps were used to produce this layer in ArcGIS Pro:1. Int tool (Spatial Analyst) to truncate double precision values; all values less than 0.99 become 0.2. Reclassify tool (Spatial Analyst) to set values 0 through 14 to NoData (Null) and all other values become 1. The figure of 14 was empirically derived as a good balance between reducing errors of commission, i.e., false-positive cells with lower values, while not introducing errors of omission by eliminating obviously populated cells.3. Copy Raster tool with Output Coordinate System environment set to Web Mercator, bit depth to 1 bit, and NoData Value to 0.Source:WorldPop Population Density 2000-2020 100m, which is created from WorldPop (www.worldpop.org - School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton; Department of Geography and Geosciences, University of Louisville; Departement de Geographie, Universite de Namur) and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University (2018). Global High Resolution Population Denominators Project - Funded by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The DOI for the original WorldPop.org total population population data is 10.5258/SOTON/WP00645.

This layer is a subset of Urban Density Footprint in 2020 global coverage to focus on the Pacific Region. This layer represents an estimate of the footprint of urban settings in 2020. It is intended as a fast-drawing cartographic layer to augment base maps and to focus a map reader's attention on the location of human population. This layer is not intended for analysis. This layer was derived from the 2020 slice of the WorldPop Population Density 2000-2020 100m and 1km layers.Also see the Populated Footprint layer, which like this layer, is intended to provide a fast-drawing cartographic context for the footprint of total population.The following processing steps were used to produce this layer in ArcGIS Pro:1. Int tool (Spatial Analyst) to truncate double precision values; all values less than 0.99 become 0.2. Reclassify tool (Spatial Analyst) to set values 0 through 1499 to NoData (Null) and all other values become 1.3. Copy Raster tool with Output Coordinate System environment set to Web Mercator, bit depth to 1 bit, and NoData Value to 0.Source:WorldPop Population Density 2000-2020 100m, which is created from WorldPop (www.worldpop.org - School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton; Department of Geography and Geosciences, University of Louisville; Departement de Geographie, Universite de Namur) and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University (2018). Global High Resolution Population Denominators Project - Funded by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The DOI for the original WorldPop.org total population population data is 10.5258/SOTON/WP00645.

This layer is a subset of Populated Footprint in 2020 Global Coverage for the Pacific Region. This layer represents an estimate of the footprint of human settlement in 2020. It is intended as a fast-drawing cartographic layer to augment base maps and to focus a map reader's attention on the location of human population. This layer is not intended for analysis.This layer was derived from the 2020 slice of the WorldPop Population Density 2000-2020 100m and 1km layers. WorldPop modeled this population footprint based on imagery datasets and population data from national statistical organizations and the United Nations. Zooming in to very large scales will often show discrepancies between reality and this or any model. Like all data sources imagery and population counts are subject to many types of error, thus this gridded footprint contains errors of omission and commission. The imagery base maps available in ArcGIS Online were not used in WorldPop's model. Imagery only informs the model of characteristics that indicate a potential for settlement, and cannot intrinsically indicate whether any or how many people live in a building. Also see the Urban Density Footprint layer, which like this layer, is intended to provide a fast-drawing cartographic context for urban populations.The following processing steps were used to produce this layer in ArcGIS Pro:1. Int tool (Spatial Analyst) to truncate double precision values; all values less than 0.99 become 0.2. Reclassify tool (Spatial Analyst) to set values 0 through 14 to NoData (Null) and all other values become 1. The figure of 14 was empirically derived as a good balance between reducing errors of commission, i.e., false-positive cells with lower values, while not introducing errors of omission by eliminating obviously populated cells.3. Copy Raster tool with Output Coordinate System environment set to Web Mercator, bit depth to 1 bit, and NoData Value to 0.Source:WorldPop Population Density 2000-2020 100m, which is created from WorldPop (www.worldpop.org - School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton; Department of Geography and Geosciences, University of Louisville; Departement de Geographie, Universite de Namur) and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University (2018). Global High Resolution Population Denominators Project - Funded by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The DOI for the original WorldPop.org total population population data is 10.5258/SOTON/WP00645.

Identifying the spatial scale of population structuring is critical for the conservation of natural populations and for drawing accurate ecological inferences. However, population studies often use spatially aggregated data to draw inferences about population trends and drivers, potentially masking ecologically relevant population sub-structure and dynamics. The goals of this study were to investigate how population dynamics models with and without spatial structure affect inferences on population trends and the identification of intrinsic drivers of population dynamics (e.g. density dependence). Specifically, we developed dynamic, age-structured, state-space models to test different hypotheses regarding the spatial structure of a population complex of coastal Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Data were from a 93-year survey of juvenile (age 0 and 1) cod sampled along >200 km of the Norwegian Skagerrak coast. We compared two models: one which assumes all sampled cod belong to one larger population, and a second which assumes that each fjord contains a unique population with locally determined dynamics. Using the best supported model, we then reconstructed the historical spatial and temporal dynamics of Skagerrak coastal cod. Cross-validation showed that the spatially structured model with local dynamics had better predictive ability. Furthermore, posterior predictive checks showed that a model which assumes one homogeneous population failed to capture the spatial correlation pattern present in the survey data. The spatially structured model indicated that population trends differed markedly among fjords, as did estimates of population parameters including density-dependent survival. Recent biomass was estimated to be at a near-record low all along the coast, but the finer scale model indicated that the decline occurred at different times in different regions. Warm temperatures were associated with poor recruitment, but local changes in habitat and fishing pressure may have played a role in driving local dynamics. More generally, we demonstrated how state-space models can be used to test evidence for population spatial structure based on survey time-series data. Our study shows the importance of considering spatially structured dynamics, as the inferences from such an approach can lead to a different ecological understanding of the drivers of population declines, and fundamentally different management actions to restore populations.

It is now commonplace for scholars to note that the number of international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) has exploded. But, in recent years, the growth rate of INGOs globally and in the United States has stagnated. We argue this stagnation can best be explained by changes in the environment in which INGOs work. Specifically, the now dense population environment discourages new INGOs from being founded, while also encouraging competition. Analysis of a new, comprehensive dataset on American INGOs between 1992 and 2012 supports the argument, as do case studies of trends within the environmental conservation and democracy assistance sectors. The analysis suggests that debates about INGO cooperation and competition overlook a key environmental factor that varies across and within populations of organizations: density. We draw out the implications of this approach for contemporary global governance.

ABS Statistics about the population, density and components of change (births, deaths, migration) for Australia's capital cities and regions.This dataset is based on ABS Population estimates and components by LGA Excel files as data sources.

China-CPZ, the core periphery zones of China, circa 1990. Core-Periphery Zones are based on a regional systems analysis of China, drawing on data about population density and agricultural intensity for county level units (see the Regional Systems Index in the ChinaA datafile). Zones were delineated considering physical geographical features such as rivers, ridge-lines, slope, and the transportation network. China's core zones represent some of the densest populations and highest levels of agricultural productivity anywhere in the post-industrial world. Traveling outward from the metropolitan cores, these levels of intensity decline, reaching their lowest levels in the peripheries along regional boundaries. This analysis complements the central place analysis of cities and towns, represented in the ChinaT datafile, which identifies nested hierarchies of regional, greater, and local city systems.

Customer initiated service requests received by 3-1-1 Contact Centre from 2009 to 2021. Service requests refer only to those call types that generate a request to a City of Vancouver department to provide service. This dataset contains location information such as address or intersection where service was requested and the local area corresponding to the case (incident) location.​Due to the volume of records, we segmented the service requests data into multiple datasets. See 3-1-1 service requests for records since 2022. Note​The 3-1-1 case management system started collecting case service requests data on June 1, 2009. The system was upgraded on August 17, 2022. Department, Division or Call Types beginning with ZZ – OLD refers to obsolete types used in the past. Generally, another call type within the same division, or another division within the same department replaced the obsolete type. When reviewing case location data spatially, consideration should be given to the City’s urban attributes such as vegetation density, population density, age of infrastructure asset, area specific bylaws, etc. Some case types are associated with city locations.​​​ Data currency​Data are static Data accuracyData are electronically extracted from the 3-1-1 case management system.Address data of some selected service request types was not disclosed to provide privacy protection.There may be addresses that do not return coordinates in the gecoding process. These records will appear in the Table view but not on the Map. Websites for further information​​Contact the City of Vancouver​

Provides regional identifiers for county based regions of various types. These can be combined with other datasets for visualization, mapping, analyses, and aggregation. These regions include:Metropolitan Statistical Areas (Current): MSAs as defined by US OMB in 2023Metropolitan Statistical Areas (2010s): MSAs as defined by US OMB in 2013Metropolitan Statistical Areas (2000s): MSAs as defined by US OMB in 2003Region: Three broad regions in North Carolina (Eastern, Western, Central)Council of GovernmentsProsperity Zones: NC Department of Commerce Prosperity ZonesNCDOT Divisions: NC Dept. of Transportation DivisionsNCDOT Districts (within Divisions)Metro Regions: Identifies Triangle, Triad, Charlotte, All Other Metros, & Non-MetropolitanUrban/Rural defined by:NC Rural Center (Urban, Regional/Suburban, Rural) - 2020 Census designations2010 Census (Urban = Counties with 50% or more population living in urban areas in 2010)2010 Census Urbanized (Urban = Counties with 50% or more of the population living in urbanized areas in 2010 (50,000+ sized urban area))Municipal Population - State Demographer (Urban = counties with 50% or more of the population living in a municipality as of July 1, 2019)Isserman Urban-Rural Density Typology

Abstract

The World Values Survey (www.worldvaluessurvey.org) is a global network of social scientists studying changing values and their impact on social and political life, led by an international team of scholars, with the WVS association and secretariat headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden. The survey, which started in 1981, seeks to use the most rigorous, high-quality research designs in each country. The WVS consists of nationally representative surveys conducted in almost 100 countries which contain almost 90 percent of the world’s population, using a common questionnaire. The WVS is the largest non-commercial, cross-national, time series investigation of human beliefs and values ever executed, currently including interviews with almost 400,000 respondents. Moreover the WVS is the only academic study covering the full range of global variations, from very poor to very rich countries, in all of the world’s major cultural zones. The WVS seeks to help scientists and policy makers understand changes in the beliefs, values and motivations of people throughout the world. Thousands of political scientists, sociologists, social psychologists, anthropologists and economists have used these data to analyze such topics as economic development, democratization, religion, gender equality, social capital, and subjective well-being. These data have also been widely used by government officials, journalists and students, and groups at the World Bank have analyzed the linkages between cultural factors and economic development.

Geographic coverage

China

Analysis unit

Household Individual

Universe

National Population, Both sexes,18 and more years

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

Sample size: 1000

The sample is a representative national sample of China containing 40 county/city sample units to collect individual level data of, from a political cultural perspective, the values and attitudes currently held by Chinese citizens. With considerations of representativeness, feasibility, and budgetary constrains, it was decided this project would draw a subsidiary probability sample out of a master sample that RCCC created based on its previous national survey on environmental awareness of the general public in China conducted in 1998. The Environmental Awareness Survey, which was used as a master sample, was a national survey conducted through out the entire country. The target population was the same as the one defined for this survey. Through the stratification, the proportionally allocated multi-stage PPS (probability proportional to size) technique was employed in order to obtain the self-weighted household samples. There were different stages in the sampling procedure: Counties and county-level cities are taken as primary sampling units (PSUs). Family households are the basic sampling unit. Demographic data at all levels was obtained from The Demographic Data for Chinese Cities and Counties, 1997, published by the State Bureau of Statistics.

Nation wide, there were 2,860 county-level units for the first stage sampling (including 1,689 counties, 436 county-level cities, and 735 urban district--with administrative rank equivalent to county--in large cities). The total households were 337,659,447. This was the base for establishing the sampling frames. Some readjustments: Taking into account of cost and accessibility, only the provincial capitals (Lhasa and Urumchi) and their surrounding areas in Tibet and Sinkiang were included in the sampling frame; in other remote western provinces, a few areas that are extremely hard to access were left out as well. After such readjustment the sampling frame then includes 2,708 county-level units, of which the total households are 322,002,173. Compared to the target population, there was a 5.3% reduction (152 units) in the first stage sampling units. However, since the population density in the remote areas of the western provinces is very low, the reduction counts merely 1.4% of the total households in the sampling frame. Geographical administrative divisions of China were regarded as the primary labels of stratification, that is, each province was treated as an independent stratum. Allocation of target sampling units among the sampling stages was designed as following: 135 PSUs out of the first sampling (county-level) units; 2 secondary sampling (townshiplevel) units in each of the PSUs; then 2 third sampling (village-level) units in each of the SSUs; 25 households in each of the third sampling units, on average. Based on the proportional stratification principle, sample allocation to strata was proportional to the size of each stratum, by an equal probability of f = .0042%. Within each stratum (province), sample sizes were calculated and allocated proportionally to each of the sampling stages. A self-weighted national sample thus was obtained.

Multi-stage PPS: -The first stage: equidistance PPS was employed to draw the county sample. -The second stage: in each of the chosen county-level units, a sampling frame was created based on the data of townships/ward and size measurement; then the equidistance PPS is employed to choose the township/streets sample. -The third stage: a third sampling frame was obtained from each of the chosen township-level units (neighbourhoods, villages and size measurement), and, again, the equidistance PPS is employed to choose the village/neighbourhood sample. -The fourth stage: in each of the chosen village/neighbourhood units, the official list of households registration was obtained; using the size measurement of this unit and the desired number of households to count the sampling distance, then households were selected according to the sampling interval. Since the household registration also listed all family members of each of the household, respondents were drawn randomly immediately after the household drawing. The WVS-China sample was drawn out of the above described master sample.

Some readjustments: Primarily because of the budgetary constrains of the WVS project, six remote provinces in the master sample were excluded. They were: Hainan, Tibet, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, and Sinkiang. These provinces are all with very low population density, and all together they count 5.1% of the total population and 4.6% of total households of the country. After the adjustments, seven of the 139 county-level units of the master sample were removed. Therefore, the target 40 PSUs were to be drawn out of the remaining 132 units.

Sampling Stages: -The first stage: 40 units were drawn from 132 county-level units of the master sample were removed. Therefore, the 40 PSUs were to be drawn out of the remaining 132 units. -The second stage: one unit was chosen randomly out of the 2 original township-level units (SSUs) in each of the 40 selected PSUs. -The third stage: one unit was chosen randomly out of the 2 original village-level units in each of the selected SSUs. -The fourth stage: from each of the chosen village-level units, 35 households were drawn out of the household registration list with equidistance, along with one respondent in each selected household.

Remarks about sampling: -Sample unit from office sampling: Housing

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

As a participating country-team of the World Values Survey (WVS), the Research Center of Contemporary China (RCCC) at Peking University implemented the WVS-China survey in 2001. The target population covers those who are between 18 and 65 of age (born between July 2, 1935 and July 1, 1982), formally registered and actually reside in dowelings within the households in China when the survey is conducted.

Response rate

The sample size was determined to be approximately 1,000 -- eligible individuals are to be drawn out of the above defined target population in China. Based on previous experience of response rate, it was decided to increase the target sample to 1,400 in order to reach a satisfied response rate. The final results are summarized as follows: - Target sample size: 1,400 - Sample drawn in the field: 1,385 - Completed, valid interviews: 1,000 - Response rate: 72.2% Summary of Non-Responses Types of Non-Responses (missing cases) % - Be away/not seen for several times: 145-37.7% - Be away for long time/be on a business trip/go abroad/travel:138-35.8% - The interviewer didnt write the reason: 23-6.0% - Rejection: 19-4.9% - Move/investigation reveals no this person: 15-3.9% - Impediments in body or language/at variance with qualification: 12-3.1% - Useless: 11-2.9% - Address is nor clear/cant find the address: 10-2.6% - A vacant house: 6-1.6% - Tenant: 6-1.6% - Total: 385-100%

Sampling error estimates

Estimated Error: 3,2

Odds ratios for individual-level categorical variables can be interpreted relative to the following baseline levels: not in poverty, not graduated from high school, does not own house, age 0−39, male, and White race. For population density, Q denotes quintile with coefficients relative to Q1. Other race denotes races other than White and Black.