8 datasets found
  1. u

    Utah Urban Areas Census 2020

    • opendata.gis.utah.gov
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jul 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center (AGRC) (2023). Utah Urban Areas Census 2020 [Dataset]. https://opendata.gis.utah.gov/datasets/utah-urban-areas-census-2020/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 12, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center (AGRC)
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    The urban areas created by the US Census Bureau "represent densely developed territory, and encompass residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. Each urban area must encompass at least 2,000 housing units or at least 5,000 people." They were created by the Bureau following the 2020 census based on the population and housing unit density of individual blocks. The 2020 Census increased the urban population and housing unit count requirements for the first time since 1910, resulting in differences between the 2010 and 2020 boundaries beyond those resulting from population change. In addition, they also stopped distinguishing between "urbanized areas" and "urban clusters" and renamed areas as needed to reflect the updated boundaries. Please see the US Census Bureau website for more information.

  2. a

    Utah Moose Habitat

    • dwr-data-utahdnr.hub.arcgis.com
    • opendata.gis.utah.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 3, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Utah DNR Online Maps (2020). Utah Moose Habitat [Dataset]. https://dwr-data-utahdnr.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/utahDNR::utah-moose-habitat/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 3, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Utah DNR Online Maps
    Area covered
    Description

    Moose distribution, season of habitat use, and habitat values are determined by local wildlife biologist relying on observations, surveys, and radio/satellite data. For use in large-scale planning and reporting.Habitat definitions:Crucial value - habitat on which the local population of a wildlife species depends for survival because there are no alternative ranges or habitats available. Crucial value habitat is essential to the life history requirements of a wildlife species. Degradation or unavailability of crucial habitat will lead to significant declines in carrying capacity and/or numbers of wildlife species in question.Substantial value - habitat used by a wildlife species but is not crucial for population survival. Degradation or unavailability of substantial value habitat will not lead to significant declines in carrying capacity and/or numbers of the wildlife species in question.

  3. a

    Utah Chukar Habitat

    • dwr-data-utahdnr.hub.arcgis.com
    • opendata.gis.utah.gov
    • +1more
    Updated May 29, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Utah DNR Online Maps (2020). Utah Chukar Habitat [Dataset]. https://dwr-data-utahdnr.hub.arcgis.com/maps/utah-chukar-habitat
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 29, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Utah DNR Online Maps
    Area covered
    Description

    Chukar distribution, season of habitat use, and habitat values are determined by local wildlife biologist relying on observations, surveys, and translpant locations. For use in large-scale planning and reporting.Habitat definitions:Crucial value - habitat on which the local population of a wildlife species depends for survival because there are no alternative ranges or habitats available. Crucial value habitat is essential to the life history requirements of a wildlife species. Degradation or unavailability of crucial habitat will lead to significant declines in carrying capacity and/or numbers of wildlife species in question.Substantial value - habitat used by a wildlife species but is not crucial for population survival. Degradation or unavailability of substantial value habitat will not lead to significant declines in carrying capacity and/or numbers of the wildlife species in question.

  4. u

    Utah Black Bear Habitat

    • opendata.gis.utah.gov
    • dwr-data-utahdnr.hub.arcgis.com
    • +2more
    Updated May 29, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Utah DNR Online Maps (2020). Utah Black Bear Habitat [Dataset]. https://opendata.gis.utah.gov/maps/utahDNR::utah-black-bear-habitat
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 29, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Utah DNR Online Maps
    Area covered
    Description

    Black bear distribution, season of habitat use, and habitat values are determined by local wildlife biologist relying on observations, surveys, and radio/satellite data. For use in large-scale planning and reporting.Habitat definitions:Crucial value - habitat on which the local population of a wildlife species depends for survival because there are no alternative ranges or habitats available. Crucial value habitat is essential to the life history requirements of a wildlife species. Degradation or unavailability of crucial habitat will lead to significant declines in carrying capacity and/or numbers of wildlife species in question.Substantial value - habitat used by a wildlife species but is not crucial for population survival. Degradation or unavailability of substantial value habitat will not lead to significant declines in carrying capacity and/or numbers of the wildlife species in question.

  5. a

    Utah Census Tracts 2020

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • opendata.gis.utah.gov
    Updated Feb 27, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center (AGRC) (2021). Utah Census Tracts 2020 [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/utah::utah-census-tracts-2020
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 27, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center (AGRC)
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Last Update: 02/2021This datasets was was downloaded from the 2020 Census Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171) page. All 2020 census boundaries are current to January 1, 2020. The Census Bureau will release the first set of corresponding demographic data in September 2021 (the 2020 Census Redistricting P.L. 94-171 Summary Files). Following that release, AGRC will append the demographic data to the existing 2020 geographies served on this page.Census tracts are small, relatively permanent subdivisions of a county designed to present and compare statistical data for areas of roughly equal population. Census tracts generally contain between 1,200 and 8,000 people, with an optimum population of 4,000. A census tract is spatially smaller in a higher-density area and larger in a more sparsely populated area. In higher-density areas, tracts can be considered approximately “neighborhood” sized.Visit the SGID 2020 Census data pagefor more information.

  6. d

    2016 Cartographic Boundary File, 2010 Urban Areas (UA) within 2010 County...

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    html, zip
    Updated Jun 5, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2017). 2016 Cartographic Boundary File, 2010 Urban Areas (UA) within 2010 County and Equivalent for Utah, 1:500,000. [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/665d73d543834afa8c5e44be8bbbc991/html
    Explore at:
    html, zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 5, 2017
    Description

    description: The 2016 cartographic boundary KMLs are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The records in this file allow users to map the parts of Urban Areas that overlap a particular county. After each decennial census, the Census Bureau delineates urban areas that represent densely developed territory, encompassing residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. In general, this territory consists of areas of high population density and urban land use resulting in a representation of the ""urban footprint."" There are two types of urban areas: urbanized areas (UAs) that contain 50,000 or more people and urban clusters (UCs) that contain at least 2,500 people, but fewer than 50,000 people (except in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam which each contain urban clusters with populations greater than 50,000). Each urban area is identified by a 5-character numeric census code that may contain leading zeroes. The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The generalized boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2010.; abstract: The 2016 cartographic boundary KMLs are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The records in this file allow users to map the parts of Urban Areas that overlap a particular county. After each decennial census, the Census Bureau delineates urban areas that represent densely developed territory, encompassing residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. In general, this territory consists of areas of high population density and urban land use resulting in a representation of the ""urban footprint."" There are two types of urban areas: urbanized areas (UAs) that contain 50,000 or more people and urban clusters (UCs) that contain at least 2,500 people, but fewer than 50,000 people (except in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam which each contain urban clusters with populations greater than 50,000). Each urban area is identified by a 5-character numeric census code that may contain leading zeroes. The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The generalized boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2010.

  7. d

    Data from: Forecasting animal distribution through individual habitat...

    • search.dataone.org
    • borealisdata.ca
    • +1more
    Updated Aug 7, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Winter, Veronica; Smith, Brian; Berger, Danielle; Hart, Ronan; Huang, John; Manlove, Kezia; Buderman, Frances; Avgar, Tal (2024). Data from: Forecasting animal distribution through individual habitat selection: Insights for population inference and transferable predictions [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/LZJURD
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Borealis
    Authors
    Winter, Veronica; Smith, Brian; Berger, Danielle; Hart, Ronan; Huang, John; Manlove, Kezia; Buderman, Frances; Avgar, Tal
    Description

    AbstractHabitat selection models frequently use data collected from a small geographic area over a short window of time to extrapolate patterns of relative abundance to unobserved areas or periods of time. However, these types of models often poorly predict how animals will use habitat beyond the place and time of data collection because space-use behaviors vary between individuals and are context-dependent. Here, we present a modelling workflow to advance predictive distribution performance by explicitly accounting for individual variability in habitat selection behavior and dependence on environmental context. Using global positioning system (GPS) data collected from 238 individual pronghorn, (Antilocapra americana), across 3 years in Utah, we combine individual-year-season-specific exponential habitat-selection models with weighted mixed-effects regressions to both draw inference about the drivers of habitat selection and predict space-use in areas/times where/when pronghorn were not monitored. We found a tremendous amount of variation in both the magnitude and direction of habitat selection behavior across seasons, but also across individuals, geographic regions, and years. We were able to attribute portions of this variation to season, movement strategy, sex, and regional variability in resources, conditions, and risks. We were also able to partition residual variation into inter- and intra-individual components. We then used the results to predict population-level, spatially and temporally dynamic, habitat-selection coefficients across Utah, resulting in a temporally dynamic map of pronghorn distribution at a 30x30m resolution but an extent of 220,000km2. We believe our transferable workflow can provide managers and researchers alike a way to turn limitations of traditional habitat selection models - variability in habitat selection - into a tool to understand and predict species-habitat associations across space and time.

  8. a

    Utah Desert Bighorn Sheep Habitat

    • utahdnr.hub.arcgis.com
    • opendata.gis.utah.gov
    Updated May 29, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Utah DNR Online Maps (2020). Utah Desert Bighorn Sheep Habitat [Dataset]. https://utahdnr.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/utahDNR::utah-desert-bighorn-sheep-habitat
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 29, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Utah DNR Online Maps
    Area covered
    Description

    Desert bighorn sheep distribution, season of habitat use, and habitat values are determined by local wildlife biologist relying on observations, surveys, and radio/satellite data. For use in large-scale planning and reporting.Habitat definitions:Crucial value - habitat on which the local population of a wildlife species depends for survival because there are no alternative ranges or habitats available. Crucial value habitat is essential to the life history requirements of a wildlife species. Degradation or unavailability of crucial habitat will lead to significant declines in carrying capacity and/or numbers of wildlife species in question.Substantial value - habitat used by a wildlife species but is not crucial for population survival. Degradation or unavailability of substantial value habitat will not lead to significant declines in carrying capacity and/or numbers of the wildlife species in question.

  9. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center (AGRC) (2023). Utah Urban Areas Census 2020 [Dataset]. https://opendata.gis.utah.gov/datasets/utah-urban-areas-census-2020/about

Utah Urban Areas Census 2020

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jul 12, 2023
Dataset authored and provided by
Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center (AGRC)
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Area covered
Description

The urban areas created by the US Census Bureau "represent densely developed territory, and encompass residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. Each urban area must encompass at least 2,000 housing units or at least 5,000 people." They were created by the Bureau following the 2020 census based on the population and housing unit density of individual blocks. The 2020 Census increased the urban population and housing unit count requirements for the first time since 1910, resulting in differences between the 2010 and 2020 boundaries beyond those resulting from population change. In addition, they also stopped distinguishing between "urbanized areas" and "urban clusters" and renamed areas as needed to reflect the updated boundaries. Please see the US Census Bureau website for more information.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu