22 datasets found
  1. Population density in Michigan 1960-2018

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 5, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Population density in Michigan 1960-2018 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/588903/michigan-population-density/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 5, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This graph shows the population density in the federal state of Michigan from 1960 to 2018. In 2018, the population density of Michigan stood at 176.8 residents per square mile of land area.

  2. Michigan Population density

    • knoema.com
    csv, json, sdmx, xls
    Updated Jun 28, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Knoema (2023). Michigan Population density [Dataset]. https://knoema.com/atlas/estados-unidos-de-am%C3%A9rica/michigan/population-density
    Explore at:
    xls, json, csv, sdmxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 28, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Knoemahttp://knoema.com/
    Time period covered
    2011 - 2022
    Area covered
    Michigan, United States
    Variables measured
    Population density
    Description

    Population density of Michigan slipped by 0.04% from 68.23 persons per sq. km in 2021 to 68.20 persons per sq. km in 2022. Since the 0.81% growth in 2020, population density declined by 0.34% in 2022.

  3. Michigan Population density

    • knoema.es
    • knoema.de
    csv, json, sdmx, xls
    Updated Jun 28, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Knoema (2023). Michigan Population density [Dataset]. https://knoema.es/atlas/Estados-Unidos-de-Am%C3%A9rica/Michigan/Population-density
    Explore at:
    json, csv, xls, sdmxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 28, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Knoemahttp://knoema.com/
    Time period covered
    2011 - 2022
    Area covered
    Míchigan, Estados Unidos
    Variables measured
    Population density
    Description

    68,20 (persons per sq. km) in 2022.

  4. m

    20 Richest Counties in Michigan

    • michigan-demographics.com
    Updated Jun 20, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kristen Carney (2024). 20 Richest Counties in Michigan [Dataset]. https://www.michigan-demographics.com/counties_by_population
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 20, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Cubit Planning, Inc.
    Authors
    Kristen Carney
    License

    https://www.michigan-demographics.com/terms_and_conditionshttps://www.michigan-demographics.com/terms_and_conditions

    Area covered
    Michigan
    Description

    A dataset listing Michigan counties by population for 2024.

  5. a

    Michigan Association of Regions

    • gis-michigan.opendata.arcgis.com
    • gis-egle.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michigan Dept. of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (2023). Michigan Association of Regions [Dataset]. https://gis-michigan.opendata.arcgis.com/items/6a0cea555ed34873ade031320451f226
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 2, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Michigan Dept. of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy
    Area covered
    Description

    This data is used in the Materials Management Facilities Web App (Item Details). From the Michigan Association of Regions (MAR) website: "The Michigan Association of Regions is a state association of the fourteen (14) regional councils in Michigan. MAR consists of a policy board of local elected and appointed officials that meets periodically to discuss regional policy issues and programs, and adopts legislative positions. MAR also has an Executive Directors Committee that meets monthly. Member services consists of advocacy of regional programs, training and education, research, membership surveys, networking, as well as liaison to national associations, including the National Association of Regional Councils (NARC) and the National Association of Development Organizations (NADO).State Designated Planning and Development Regions are voluntary organizations comprised of local governments dedicated to serving the regional planning needs of multi-county areas in all parts of Michigan. They are a form of local government voluntarily created by their members, which are largely representative of local governments in the region; although membership also includes road authorities, nonprofit organizations and representatives of the business community in many regions.The land area of Michigan is divided into 14 planning & development regions with counties as the organizing unit. They range widely in size. Five have only three counties, while one has fourteen counties. The two smallest are only 1,711-13 square miles each in size, while the largest is 8,735 square miles in size. Population served varies from 57,510 persons to 4,833,493 based on Census estimates in 2000. Population density ranges from under 14 persons/square mile in Region 13 (Western U.P.), to over 1,043 persons/square mile in Region 1 (Southeast Michigan). The oldest of today’s regions, Tri-County Regional Planning Commission (Region 6 in Lansing, formed in 1956), and the three county Detroit Metropolitan Area Regional Planning Commission (formed in 1947and subsequently replaced by the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments in 1968 (SEMCOG, which covers seven counties in SE Michigan), originated out of a desire by local officials to coordinate transportation infrastructure planning and to serve as a forum for other regional issues."These boundaries are static and were digitized from boundaries shared on the Michigan Association of Regions (MAR) website in March 2023. They were digitized for inclusion on the Materials Management Division's facilities web map. For questions or comments, reach out to EGLE-Maps@Michigan.gov.

  6. Data from: Kellogg Biological Station site, station Ionia County, MI (FIPS...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Michael R. Haines; Ted Gragson; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Christopher Boone; Nichole Rosamilia; EcoTrends Project (2015). Kellogg Biological Station site, station Ionia County, MI (FIPS 26067), study of human population density in units of numberPerKilometerSquared on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F9218%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Michael R. Haines; Ted Gragson; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Christopher Boone; Nichole Rosamilia; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1880 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) contains human population density measurements in numberPerKilometerSquared units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  7. U

    Bottom Trawl Catch Alewife Densities and Ages in Lakes Michigan and Huron

    • data.usgs.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Mar 15, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Darryl Hondorp; David Bunnell; Charles Madenjian; Andrew Honsey (2024). Bottom Trawl Catch Alewife Densities and Ages in Lakes Michigan and Huron [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5066/P95KVYGG
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    Darryl Hondorp; David Bunnell; Charles Madenjian; Andrew Honsey
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    1973 - 2022
    Area covered
    Michigan
    Description

    This data release provides catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) data by age-class for alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus) based on bottom trawl surveys from Lake Michigan (1973-2022) or Lake Huron (1976-2004). These data are associated with a study that sought to evaluate whether alewife populations across the Great Lakes are synchronous in their time series.

  8. d

    2019 Cartographic Boundary Shapefile, 2010 Urban Areas (UA) within 2010...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Dec 3, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2020). 2019 Cartographic Boundary Shapefile, 2010 Urban Areas (UA) within 2010 County and Equivalent for Michigan, 1:500,000 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/2019-cartographic-boundary-shapefile-2010-urban-areas-ua-within-2010-county-and-equivalent-for-12
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 2020
    Description

    The 2019 cartographic boundary shapefiles are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The records in this file allow users to map the parts of Urban Areas that overlap a particular county. After each decennial census, the Census Bureau delineates urban areas that represent densely developed territory, encompassing residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. In general, this territory consists of areas of high population density and urban land use resulting in a representation of the ""urban footprint."" There are two types of urban areas: urbanized areas (UAs) that contain 50,000 or more people and urban clusters (UCs) that contain at least 2,500 people, but fewer than 50,000 people (except in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam which each contain urban clusters with populations greater than 50,000). Each urban area is identified by a 5-character numeric census code that may contain leading zeroes. The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The generalized boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2010.

  9. Data from: High-density genomic data reveal fine-scale population structure...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • zenodo.org
    • +1more
    zip
    Updated Sep 23, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yue Shi (2022). High-density genomic data reveal fine-scale population structure and pronounced islands of adaptive divergence in lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) from Lake Michigan [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.r4xgxd2gq
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 23, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    University of Alaska Fairbanks
    Authors
    Yue Shi
    License

    https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html

    Area covered
    Lake Michigan, Michigan
    Description

    Understanding patterns of genetic structure and adaptive variation in natural populations is crucial for informing conservation and management. Past genetic research using 11 microsatellite loci identified six genetic stocks of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) within Lake Michigan, USA. However, ambiguity in genetic stock assignments suggested those neutral microsatellite markers did not provide adequate power for delineating lake whitefish stocks in this system, prompting calls for a genomics approach to investigate stock structure. Here, we generated a dense genomic dataset to characterize population structure and investigate patterns of neutral and adaptive genetic diversity among lake whitefish populations in Lake Michigan. Using Rapture sequencing, we genotyped 829 individuals collected from 17 baseline populations at 197,588 SNP markers after quality filtering. Although the overall pattern of genetic structure was similar to the previous microsatellite study, our genomic data provided several novel insights. Our results indicated a large genetic break between the northwestern and eastern sides of Lake Michigan, and we found a much greater level of population structure on the eastern side compared to the northwestern side. Collectively, we observed five genomic islands of adaptive divergence on five different chromosomes. Each island displayed a different pattern of population structure, suggesting that combinations of genotypes at these adaptive regions are facilitating local adaptation to spatially heterogenous selection pressures. Additionally, we identified a large linkage disequilibrium block of ~8.5 Mb on chromosome 20 that is suggestive of a putative inversion but with a low frequency of the minor haplotype. Our study provides a comprehensive assessment of population structure and adaptive variation that can help inform management of Lake Michigan's lake whitefish fishery and highlights the utility of incorporating adaptive loci into fisheries management.

  10. d

    2015 Cartographic Boundary File, Urban Area-State-County for Michigan,...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jan 13, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2021). 2015 Cartographic Boundary File, Urban Area-State-County for Michigan, 1:500,000 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/2015-cartographic-boundary-file-urban-area-state-county-for-michigan-1-5000001
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 13, 2021
    Area covered
    Michigan
    Description

    The 2015 cartographic boundary shapefiles are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The records in this file allow users to map the parts of Urban Areas that overlap a particular county. After each decennial census, the Census Bureau delineates urban areas that represent densely developed territory, encompassing residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. In general, this territory consists of areas of high population density and urban land use resulting in a representation of the "urban footprint." There are two types of urban areas: urbanized areas (UAs) that contain 50,000 or more people and urban clusters (UCs) that contain at least 2,500 people, but fewer than 50,000 people (except in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam which each contain urban clusters with populations greater than 50,000). Each urban area is identified by a 5-character numeric census code that may contain leading zeroes. The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2010.

  11. o

    National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA): Socioeconomic Status and...

    • openicpsr.org
    sas, stata
    Updated May 14, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Robert Melendez; Philippa Clarke; Anam Khan; Iris Gomez-Lopez; Mao Li; Megan Chenoweth (2020). National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA): Socioeconomic Status and Demographic Characteristics of Census Tracts, United States, 2008-2017 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/E119451V2
    Explore at:
    sas, stataAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 14, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    University of Michigan Institute for Social Research
    University of Michigan. Institute for Social Research
    Authors
    Robert Melendez; Philippa Clarke; Anam Khan; Iris Gomez-Lopez; Mao Li; Megan Chenoweth
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2008 - 2017
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This dataset contains measures of socioeconomic and demographic characteristics by US census tract for the years 2008-2017. Example measures include population density; population distribution by race, ethnicity, age, and income; and proportion of population living below the poverty level, receiving public assistance, and female-headed families. The dataset also contains a set of index variables to represent neighborhood disadvantage and affluence.A curated version of this data is available through ICPSR at http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38528.v1.

  12. o

    National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA): Urbanicity by Census Tract,...

    • openicpsr.org
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    • +1more
    sas, stata
    Updated Jan 11, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stephanie Miller; Robert Melendez; Megan Chenoweth (2021). National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA): Urbanicity by Census Tract, United States, 2010 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/E130542V1
    Explore at:
    sas, stataAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 11, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    University of Michigan
    University of Michigan. Institute for Social Research
    Authors
    Stephanie Miller; Robert Melendez; Megan Chenoweth
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2010
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This dataset contains measures of the urban/rural characteristics of each census tract in the United States. These include proportions of urban and rural population, population density, rural/urban commuting area (RUCA) codes, and RUCA-based four- and seven- category urbanicity scales. A curated version of this data is available through ICPSR at https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38606/versions/V1

  13. u

    Data from: Emerald ash borer biocontrol in ash saplings: the potential for...

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    xlsx
    Updated Jan 31, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jian Duan; Leah S. Bauer; Roy G. van Driesche (2024). Data from: Emerald ash borer biocontrol in ash saplings: the potential for early stage recovery of North American Ash trees [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/1347361
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 31, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Ag Data Commons
    Authors
    Jian Duan; Leah S. Bauer; Roy G. van Driesche
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Our study on saplings was conducted in six forested sites in three southern Michigan counties: Ingham Co. (three sites), Gratiot Co. (two sites), and Shiawassee Co. (one site), with 10 to 60 km between sites.Data set one - on the fate and density of emerald ash borer larvae and associated parasitoids on ash saplings from both biocontrol-release and non-release control plots in southern Michigan during the three-year study (2013–2015). Data set one was used for calculations and associated analyses for of the parameters presented in Figure 1, 2, 3, and 4.Data set two - on ash tree abundance (per 100 m2) and healthy conditions (or crown classes) at the six study sites in southern Michigan observed in summer 2015. Data set two was used for estimation of tree density (Figure 5) and healthy condition (or crown classes).Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Emerald ash borer biocontrol in ash saplings: the potential for early stage recovery of North American ash trees. File Name: Sapling Data 2013-2015 FINAL.xlsx Resource Description: Data set one - on fate and density of emerald ash borer larvae and/or pupae and associated mortality factors (parasitoids, predators, and undetermined diseases/plant resistance /competition)Resource Title: Emerald ash borer biocontrol in ash saplings: the potential for early stage recovery of North American ash trees. File Name: MI Ash Transect 2015 - All trees.xlsx Resource Description: Data on ash abundance and healthy conditions from transect surveyResource Title: Data Dictionary - EAB biocontrol in ash saplings. File Name: EAB_data_dictionary.csvResource Title: 2013-2014 data sorted. File Name: 2013-2014_data_sorted_EAB.csv Resource Description: Data set one - on fate and density of emerald ash borer larvae and/or pupae and associated mortality factors (parasitoids, predators, and undetermined diseases/plant resistance /competition)Resource Title: 2014-2015 data sorted. File Name: 2014-2015_data_sorted_EAB.csv Resource Description: Data set one - on fate and density of emerald ash borer larvae and/or pupae and associated mortality factors (parasitoids, predators, and undetermined diseases/plant resistance /competition)Resource Title: 2015-2016 data sorted. File Name: 2015-2016_data_sorted_EAB.csv Resource Description: Data set one - on fate and density of emerald ash borer larvae and/or pupae and associated mortality factors (parasitoids, predators, and undetermined diseases/plant resistance /competition)Resource Title: Combined: Emerald ash borer biocontrol in ash saplings: the potential for early stage recovery of North American ash trees. File Name: Emerald ash borer biocontrol in ash saplings the potential for early stage recovery of North American ash trees.csv Resource Description: Data set one - on fate and density of emerald ash borer larvae and/or pupae and associated mortality factors (parasitoids, predators, and undetermined diseases/plant resistance /competition) All 3 sets (2013-2016) combined into a CSV for visualization purposesResource Title: Emerald ash borer biocontrol in ash saplings: the potential for early stage recovery of North American ash trees. File Name: MI Ash Transect 2015 - All trees.csv Resource Description: Data on ash abundance and healthy conditions from transect survey (CSV version for data visualization)Resource Title: Estimates of the net population growth rate of emerald ash borer on saplings from life tables constructed from Dataset One. File Name: DUAN J Data on EAB Life Tables Calculation for Saplings 2013-2015.xlsx Resource Description: This life table of emerald ash borer on saplings was constructed from Dataset One and used to estimate the next population growth rate according to method described in Duan et al. (2014, 2017)Resource Title: Estimates of the net population growth rate of emerald ash borer on saplings from life tables constructed from Dataset One. File Name: EAB_Life_Tables_Calculation_for_Saplings_2013-2015.csv Resource Description: CSV version of the data - This life table of emerald ash borer on saplings was constructed from Dataset One and used to estimate the next population growth rate according to method described in Duan et al. (2014, 2017)

  14. S

    Data from: Evaluating consumptive and nonconsumptive predator effects on...

    • data.subak.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +2more
    csv
    Updated Feb 16, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bradley University (2023). Data from: Evaluating consumptive and nonconsumptive predator effects on prey density using field times series data [Dataset]. https://data.subak.org/dataset/data-from-evaluating-consumptive-and-nonconsumptive-predator-effects-on-prey-density-using-fiel
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Bradley University
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Determining the degree to which predation affects prey abundance in natural communities constitutes a key goal of ecological research. Predators can affect prey through both consumptive effects (CEs) and nonconsumptive effects (NCEs), although the contributions of each mechanism to the density of prey populations remain largely hypothetical in most systems. Common statistical methods applied to time series data cannot elucidate the mechanisms responsible for hypothesized predator effects on prey density (e.g., differentiate CEs from NCEs), nor provide parameters for predictive models. State space models (SSMs) applied to time series data offer a way to meet these goals. Here, we employ SSMs to assess effects of an invasive predatory zooplankter, Bythotrephes longimanus, on an important prey species, Daphnia mendotae, in Lake Michigan. We fit mechanistic models in a SSM framework to seasonal time series (1994-2012) using a recently developed, maximum likelihood-based optimization method, iterated filtering, which can overcome challenges in ecological data (e.g. nonlinearities, measurement error, and irregular sampling intervals). Our results indicate that B. longimanus strongly influences D. mendotae dynamics, with mean annual peak densities of B. longimanus observed in Lake Michigan estimated to cause a 61% reduction in D. mendotae population growth rate and a 59% reduction in peak biomass density. Further, the mechanism underlying the B. longimanus effect is most consistent with an NCE via reduced birth rates. The SSM approach also provided estimates for key biological parameters (e.g., demographic rates) and the contribution of dynamic stochasticity and measurement error. Our study therefore highlights the utility of SSMs to enhance inference for species interactions from time series data. In particular, our findings provide evidence derived directly from survey data that the invasive zooplankter B. longimanus is affecting zooplankton demographics and offer parameter estimates needed to inform predictive models that explore the effect of B. longimanus under different scenarios such as climate change.

  15. n

    Güney Karolina daki şehirler ve kasabalar listesi

    • wikipedia.tr-tr.nina.az
    Updated Jul 16, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2024). Güney Karolina daki şehirler ve kasabalar listesi [Dataset]. https://www.wikipedia.tr-tr.nina.az/G%C3%BCney_Karolina'daki_%C5%9Fehirler_ve_kasabalar_listesi.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 16, 2024
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    South Carolina
    Description

    Place Name A Type of incorporation Population 2011 Area 2010 Density 2010 sq mi km2 sq mi km2Abbeville Abbeville County

  16. o

    National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA): Grocery Stores by Census Tract,...

    • openicpsr.org
    • test.openicpsr.org
    Updated Nov 4, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jessica Finlay; Mao Li; Michael Esposito; Iris Gomez-Lopez; Anam Khan; Philippa Clarke; Megan Chenoweth (2019). National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA): Grocery Stores by Census Tract, United States, 2003-2017 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/E123001V1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 4, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    University of Michigan. Institute for Social Research
    Authors
    Jessica Finlay; Mao Li; Michael Esposito; Iris Gomez-Lopez; Anam Khan; Philippa Clarke; Megan Chenoweth
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This dataset contains measures of the number and density of grocery stores – including supermarkets, specialty food stores, and warehouse clubs – per United States census tract from 2003 through 2017. These types of businesses represent places where neighborhood residents can obtain fresh and healthy foods.

  17. Data from: North Temperate Lakes site, station Gogebic County, MI (FIPS...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Christopher Boone; Nichole Rosamilia; Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project (2015). North Temperate Lakes site, station Gogebic County, MI (FIPS 26053), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F11067%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Christopher Boone; Nichole Rosamilia; Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1890 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from North Temperate Lakes (NTL) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  18. Data from: Kellogg Biological Station site, station Eaton County, MI (FIPS...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ted Gragson; Christopher Boone; Michael R. Haines; Nichole Rosamilia; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project (2015). Kellogg Biological Station site, station Eaton County, MI (FIPS 26045), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F9206%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Ted Gragson; Christopher Boone; Michael R. Haines; Nichole Rosamilia; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1840 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  19. Kellogg Biological Station site, station Barry County, MI (FIPS 26015),...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Christopher Boone; Ted Gragson; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Michael R. Haines; Nichole Rosamilia; EcoTrends Project (2015). Kellogg Biological Station site, station Barry County, MI (FIPS 26015), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F9162%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Christopher Boone; Ted Gragson; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Michael R. Haines; Nichole Rosamilia; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1840 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  20. Data from: Kellogg Biological Station site, station Kalamazoo County, MI...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Christopher Boone; Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Nichole Rosamilia; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Ted Gragson; EcoTrends Project (2015). Kellogg Biological Station site, station Kalamazoo County, MI (FIPS 26077), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F9228%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Christopher Boone; Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Nichole Rosamilia; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Ted Gragson; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1840 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2024). Population density in Michigan 1960-2018 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/588903/michigan-population-density/
Organization logo

Population density in Michigan 1960-2018

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jul 5, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
United States
Description

This graph shows the population density in the federal state of Michigan from 1960 to 2018. In 2018, the population density of Michigan stood at 176.8 residents per square mile of land area.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu