19 datasets found
  1. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2021, State, Kansas, Census Tracts

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Nov 1, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Spatial Data Collection and Products Branch (Publisher) (2022). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2021, State, Kansas, Census Tracts [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2021-state-kansas-census-tracts
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 1, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    Area covered
    Kansas
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Census tracts are small, relatively permanent statistical subdivisions of a county or equivalent entity, and were defined by local participants as part of the 2020 Census Participant Statistical Areas Program. The Census Bureau delineated the census tracts in situations where no local participant existed or where all the potential participants declined to participate. The primary purpose of census tracts is to provide a stable set of geographic units for the presentation of census data and comparison back to previous decennial censuses. Census tracts generally have a population size between 1,200 and 8,000 people, with an optimum size of 4,000 people. When first delineated, census tracts were designed to be homogeneous with respect to population characteristics, economic status, and living conditions. The spatial size of census tracts varies widely depending on the density of settlement. Physical changes in street patterns caused by highway construction, new development, and so forth, may require boundary revisions. In addition, census tracts occasionally are split due to population growth, or combined as a result of substantial population decline. Census tract boundaries generally follow visible and identifiable features. They may follow legal boundaries such as minor civil division (MCD) or incorporated place boundaries in some States and situations to allow for census tract-to-governmental unit relationships where the governmental boundaries tend to remain unchanged between censuses. State and county boundaries always are census tract boundaries in the standard census geographic hierarchy. In a few rare instances, a census tract may consist of noncontiguous areas. These noncontiguous areas may occur where the census tracts are coextensive with all or parts of legal entities that are themselves noncontiguous. For the 2010 Census and beyond, the census tract code range of 9400 through 9499 was enforced for census tracts that include a majority American Indian population according to Census 2000 data and/or their area was primarily covered by federally recognized American Indian reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands; the code range 9800 through 9899 was enforced for those census tracts that contained little or no population and represented a relatively large special land use area such as a National Park, military installation, or a business/industrial park; and the code range 9900 through 9998 was enforced for those census tracts that contained only water area, no land area.

  2. Data from: Konza Prairie site, station Chautauqua County, KS (FIPS 20019),...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michael R. Haines; Nichole Rosamilia; Christopher Boone; Ted Gragson; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project (2015). Konza Prairie site, station Chautauqua County, KS (FIPS 20019), study of human population density in units of numberPerKilometerSquared on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F10109%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Michael R. Haines; Nichole Rosamilia; Christopher Boone; Ted Gragson; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1880 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Konza Prairie (KNZ) contains human population density measurements in numberPerKilometerSquared units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  3. Data from: Konza Prairie site, station Wabaunsee County, KS (FIPS 20197),...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Christopher Boone; Ted Gragson; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Nichole Rosamilia; EcoTrends Project (2015). Konza Prairie site, station Wabaunsee County, KS (FIPS 20197), study of human population density in units of numberPerKilometerSquared on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F10208%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Christopher Boone; Ted Gragson; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Nichole Rosamilia; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1880 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Konza Prairie (KNZ) contains human population density measurements in numberPerKilometerSquared units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  4. a

    Socio-Economic Index

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Nov 12, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Unified Government of Wyandotte County Kansas City, Ks (2016). Socio-Economic Index [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/unifiedgov::socio-economic-index/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 12, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Unified Government of Wyandotte County Kansas City, Ks
    Area covered
    Description

    Socio-Economic Index of 7 variables overlayed to compare with the physical blight index- Education, Median Household Income, Renter Occupied, Single Parent Households, Population Density, Poverty Rate, and Unemployment Rate. This map was used to help question what socio-economic factors correlate with the observance of blighted areas in order to better create strategic decisions on how to best prevent blight.By using this dataset you acknowledge the following:Kansas Open Records Act StatementThe Kansas Open Records Act provides in K.S.A. 45-230 that "no person shall knowingly sell, give or receive, for the purpose of selling or offering for sale, any property or service to persons listed therein, any list of names and addresses contained in, or derived from public records..." Violation of this law may subject the violator to a civil penalty of $500.00 for each violation. Violators will be reported for prosecution.By accessing this site, the user makes the following certification pursuant to K.S.A. 45-220(c)(2): "The requester does not intend to, and will not: (A) Use any list of names or addresses contained in or derived from the records or information for the purpose of selling or offering for sale any property or service to any person listed or to any person who resides at any address listed; or (B) sell, give or otherwise make available to any person any list of names or addresses contained in or derived from the records or information for the purpose of allowing that person to sell or offer for sale any property or service to any person listed or to any person who resides at any address listed."

  5. M

    Kansas - Median Household Income (1984-2023)

    • macrotrends.net
    csv
    Updated Jun 30, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    MACROTRENDS (2025). Kansas - Median Household Income (1984-2023) [Dataset]. https://www.macrotrends.net/5669/kansas-median-household-income
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    MACROTRENDS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    1984 - 2023
    Area covered
    United States, Kansas
    Description

    Household data are collected as of March.

    As stated in the Census's "Source and Accuracy of Estimates for Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011" (http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/p60_243sa.pdf):

    Estimation of Median Incomes. The Census Bureau has changed the methodology for computing median income over time. The Census Bureau has computed medians using either Pareto interpolation or linear interpolation. Currently, we are using linear interpolation to estimate all medians. Pareto interpolation assumes a decreasing density of population within an income interval, whereas linear interpolation assumes a constant density of population within an income interval. The Census Bureau calculated estimates of median income and associated standard errors for 1979 through 1987 using Pareto interpolation if the estimate was larger than $20,000 for people or $40,000 for families and households. This is because the width of the income interval containing the estimate is greater than $2,500.

    We calculated estimates of median income and associated standard errors for 1976, 1977, and 1978 using Pareto interpolation if the estimate was larger than $12,000 for people or $18,000 for families and households. This is because the width of the income interval containing the estimate is greater than $1,000. All other estimates of median income and associated standard errors for 1976 through 2011 (2012 ASEC) and almost all of the estimates of median income and associated standard errors for 1975 and earlier were calculated using linear interpolation.

    Thus, use caution when comparing median incomes above $12,000 for people or $18,000 for families and households for different years. Median incomes below those levels are more comparable from year to year since they have always been calculated using linear interpolation. For an indication of the comparability of medians calculated using Pareto interpolation with medians calculated using linear interpolation, see Series P-60, Number 114, Money Income in 1976 of Families and Persons in the United States (www2.census.gov/prod2/popscan/p60-114.pdf).

  6. f

    Appendix B. A figure depicting observed and predicted population density for...

    • wiley.figshare.com
    html
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Peter B. Adler; Janneke HilleRisLambers (2023). Appendix B. A figure depicting observed and predicted population density for the 10 study species. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3530108.v1
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Wiley
    Authors
    Peter B. Adler; Janneke HilleRisLambers
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    A figure depicting observed and predicted population density for the 10 study species.

  7. d

    National Fish Habitat Action Plan (NFHAP) 2010 HCI Scores and Human...

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    Updated May 21, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2018). National Fish Habitat Action Plan (NFHAP) 2010 HCI Scores and Human Disturbance Data (linked to NHDPLUSV1) for Kansas. [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/24e23eb448354ee888a35756b9da6562/html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 21, 2018
    Description

    description: This shapefile contains landscape factors representing human disturbances summarized to local and network catchments of river reaches for the state of Kansas. This dataset is the result of clipping the feature class 'NFHAP 2010 HCI Scores and Human Disturbance Data for the Conterminous United States linked to NHDPLUSV1.gdb' to the state boundary of Kansas. Landscape factors include land uses, population density, roads, dams, mines, and point-source pollution sites. The source datasets that were compiled and attributed to catchments were identified as being: (1) meaningful for assessing fish habitat; (2) consistent across the entire study area in the way that they were assembled; (3) representative of conditions in the past 10 years, and (4) of sufficient spatial resolution that they could be used to make valid comparisons among local catchment units. In this data set, these variables are linked to the catchments of the National Hydrography Dataset Plus Version 1 (NHDPlusV1) using the COMID identifier. They can also be linked to the reaches of the NHDPlusV1 using the COMID identifier. Catchment attributes are available for both local catchments (defined as the land area draining directly to a reach; attributes begin with "L_" prefix) and network catchments (defined by all upstream contributing catchments to the reach's outlet, including the reach's own local catchment; attributes begin with "N_" prefix). This shapefile also includes habitat condition scores created based on responsiveness of biological metrics to anthropogenic landscape disturbances throughout ecoregions. Separate scores were created by considering disturbances within local catchments, network catchments, and a cumulative score that accounted for the most limiting disturbance operating on a given biological metric in either local or network catchments. This assessment only scored reaches representing streams and rivers (see the process section for more details). Please use the following citation: Esselman, P., D.M. Infante, L. Wang, W. Taylor, W. Daniel, R. Tingley, J. Fenner, A. Cooper, D. Wieferich, D. Thornbrugh and J. Ross. (April 2011) National Fish Habitat Action Plan (NFHAP) 2010 HCI Scores and Human Disturbance Data (linked to NHDPLUSV1) for Kansas. National Fish Habitat Partnership Data System. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F78050M2; abstract: This shapefile contains landscape factors representing human disturbances summarized to local and network catchments of river reaches for the state of Kansas. This dataset is the result of clipping the feature class 'NFHAP 2010 HCI Scores and Human Disturbance Data for the Conterminous United States linked to NHDPLUSV1.gdb' to the state boundary of Kansas. Landscape factors include land uses, population density, roads, dams, mines, and point-source pollution sites. The source datasets that were compiled and attributed to catchments were identified as being: (1) meaningful for assessing fish habitat; (2) consistent across the entire study area in the way that they were assembled; (3) representative of conditions in the past 10 years, and (4) of sufficient spatial resolution that they could be used to make valid comparisons among local catchment units. In this data set, these variables are linked to the catchments of the National Hydrography Dataset Plus Version 1 (NHDPlusV1) using the COMID identifier. They can also be linked to the reaches of the NHDPlusV1 using the COMID identifier. Catchment attributes are available for both local catchments (defined as the land area draining directly to a reach; attributes begin with "L_" prefix) and network catchments (defined by all upstream contributing catchments to the reach's outlet, including the reach's own local catchment; attributes begin with "N_" prefix). This shapefile also includes habitat condition scores created based on responsiveness of biological metrics to anthropogenic landscape disturbances throughout ecoregions. Separate scores were created by considering disturbances within local catchments, network catchments, and a cumulative score that accounted for the most limiting disturbance operating on a given biological metric in either local or network catchments. This assessment only scored reaches representing streams and rivers (see the process section for more details). Please use the following citation: Esselman, P., D.M. Infante, L. Wang, W. Taylor, W. Daniel, R. Tingley, J. Fenner, A. Cooper, D. Wieferich, D. Thornbrugh and J. Ross. (April 2011) National Fish Habitat Action Plan (NFHAP) 2010 HCI Scores and Human Disturbance Data (linked to NHDPLUSV1) for Kansas. National Fish Habitat Partnership Data System. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F78050M2

  8. f

    Values of demographic parameters used to simulate individual-based models...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 6, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Beth E. Ross; Daniel S. Sullins; David A. Haukos (2023). Values of demographic parameters used to simulate individual-based models for lesser prairie-chickens in Kansas. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217172.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 6, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Beth E. Ross; Daniel S. Sullins; David A. Haukos
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Kansas
    Description

    Values of demographic parameters used to simulate individual-based models for lesser prairie-chickens in Kansas.

  9. Data from: Konza Prairie site, station Cowley County, KS (FIPS 20035), study...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; Christopher Boone; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Nichole Rosamilia; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project (2015). Konza Prairie site, station Cowley County, KS (FIPS 20035), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F10119%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; Christopher Boone; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Nichole Rosamilia; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1860 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Konza Prairie (KNZ) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  10. Hrycyna et al. 2022 - Satellite observations of NO2 indicate legacy impacts...

    • zenodo.org
    csv
    Updated Sep 17, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Elizabeth Hrycyna; Mary Heskel; Mary Heskel; Jennings Mergenthal; Saiido Noor; Elizabeth Hrycyna; Jennings Mergenthal; Saiido Noor (2024). Hrycyna et al. 2022 - Satellite observations of NO2 indicate legacy impacts of Redlining in US Midwestern cities [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6536185
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 17, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Elizabeth Hrycyna; Mary Heskel; Mary Heskel; Jennings Mergenthal; Saiido Noor; Elizabeth Hrycyna; Jennings Mergenthal; Saiido Noor
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Midwestern United States, United States
    Description

    This dataset contains remotely sensed estimates of nitrogen dioxide (NO2, via TROPOMI accessed via Google Earth Engine) for HOLC neighborhoods in 11 US Midwestern cities, and corresponding coarse geographic and demographic data of those cities. NO2 data is reported daily for the entire calendar year of 2019, geographic and demographic variables are fixed for each city for the entire year. Each HOLC-graded neighborhood included in this dataset was filtered to be greater than 2 km2. The number of pixels used to calculate the area-weighted mean of NO2 is also reported, as is the area of the neighborhood. The dataset has also been filtered for observations that did not pass quality filters for L3 TROPOMI data. The cities included in the study are: Chicago IL, Milwaukee WI, Saint Paul MN, Minneapolis MN, Indianapolis IN, Cleveland OH, Wichita KS, Greater Kansas City KS and MO, Columbus OH, Detroit MI, and Omaha NE. HOLC neighborhood shapefiles were obtained from the Mapping Inequality project website, hosted by the University of Richmond, and resulting polygons used in analysis were created by dissolving shared boundaries in Google Earth Engine. City populations and population density were obtained from the US 2010 Census data. All data was collected and organized to assess if current day NO2 levels varied with HOLC grades in these major cities.

    Data was used in the study: Hrycyna et al. (2022) Elementa 10(1):00027

    Robert K. Nelson, LaDale Winling, Richard Marciano, Nathan Connolly, et al., “Mapping Inequality,” American Panorama, ed. https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/redlining/#loc=5/39.1/-94.58&text=downloads

    Dataset for all analyses presented in Hrycyna et al. Columns described below:

    HOLC_grade: A, B, C, D (neighborhood grade categories obtained from Mapping Inequality project, indicate historic HOLC designations of neighborhoods).

    HOLCAreaKm2: continuous area value in km2 of the HOLC neighborhood polygon, which may be more than one HOLC designated polygon merged from the shapefiles downloaded from Mapping Inequality.

    pixelcount: integer values of the number of TROPOMI NO2 pixels used to produce the area-weighted mean NO2 value.

    NO2_mol_m2: area-weighted mean value of TROPOMI NO2 for that HOLC neighborhood polygon in mol m-2

    system.index: designated date and time boundary of the observation collected via TROPOMI

    date: date of observation

    month: month of observation

    City: city in the US Midwest

    State: state for the city of focus

    Population: urban population obtained from 2010 census

    PopDensity: urban population density obtained from 2010 census, based on modern city boundaries (in people per square miles)

    CityArea_mi2: Area of the city of interest, in square miles.

    ln_NO2: natural log transformed NO2 values in mol m-2

    NO2_DU: NO2 value converted from mol m-2 to DU (Dobsons Units, converted by multiplying 2241.15)

    NO2_lnDU: natural log transformed NO2 values in DU

  11. n

    Data from: Contrasting intra-annual population dynamics of two codominant...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • datadryad.org
    zip
    Updated Nov 29, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jesse Gray; Melinda Smith (2022). Contrasting intra-annual population dynamics of two codominant species are consistent across spatial and temporal scales [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8w9ghx3r3
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 29, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    University of Colorado Boulder
    Colorado State University
    Authors
    Jesse Gray; Melinda Smith
    License

    https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html

    Description
    1. Despite asymmetric competition and a wide array of functional similarities, two ecologically important C4 perennial grasses, Andropogon gerardii and Sorghastrum nutans, frequently codominate areas of the mesic tallgrass prairie of the US Great Plains. A subtle difference in their vegetative reproduction strategies may play a role in preventing exclusion of S. nutans, the presumed weaker competitor in this region.
    2. While A. gerardii vegetative tiller densities peak in the early growing season and decline thereafter (determinate recruitment), those of S. nutans may continue to increase throughout the growing season (indeterminate recruitment), providing a potential avenue for recovery from more intensive early season competition. However, until now these patterns have only been informally observed in the field.
    3. We examined the year-to-year consistency of growing season vegetative tiller dynamics (measured as seasonal change in tiller densities) of each grass species from at an intact tallgrass prairie in Kansas - a site within the core of both species’ distributions - over a period of 8 years. Then, to investigate environmental effects on these dynamics, we examined whether they differ across a Kansas landscape varying in topography, fire management regimes and the abundances of the study species. Finally, we expanded the investigation of environmental effects on growing season tiller dynamics by observing them at the periphery of the species’ distributions in central Colorado, where climatic conditions are dryer and the study species’ abundances are reduced.
    4. Synthesis: We found that the tiller densities of A. gerardii decline within seasons with striking consistency regardless of spatio-temporal scale or environmental factors (topography and fire regimes). In contrast, we found the seasonal dynamics of S. nutans tiller densities were dependent on environmental factors, with seasonal tiller density increases occurring only within the Kansas populations but not consistently between years. These observations lay the groundwork for establishing differences in tiller recruitment determinacy as a potentially important yet underappreciated mechanism for promoting coexistence and codominance among perennial plant species.
  12. Data from: Konza Prairie site, station Butler County, KS (FIPS 20015), study...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nichole Rosamilia; Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Christopher Boone; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Ted Gragson; EcoTrends Project (2015). Konza Prairie site, station Butler County, KS (FIPS 20015), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F10086%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Nichole Rosamilia; Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Christopher Boone; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Ted Gragson; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1860 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Konza Prairie (KNZ) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  13. f

    Appendix A. A table presenting mean survival and recruitment parameter...

    • wiley.figshare.com
    html
    Updated Jun 3, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Peter B. Adler; Janneke HilleRisLambers (2023). Appendix A. A table presenting mean survival and recruitment parameter values and upper and lower 95% credibility-interval limits, by study species. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3530111.v1
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 3, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Wiley
    Authors
    Peter B. Adler; Janneke HilleRisLambers
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    A table presenting mean survival and recruitment parameter values and upper and lower 95% credibility-interval limits, by study species.

  14. Data from: Konza Prairie site, station Wabaunsee County, KS (FIPS 20197),...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Christopher Boone; Nichole Rosamilia; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; EcoTrends Project (2015). Konza Prairie site, station Wabaunsee County, KS (FIPS 20197), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F10207%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Christopher Boone; Nichole Rosamilia; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1860 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Konza Prairie (KNZ) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  15. Data from: Konza Prairie site, station Lyon County, KS (FIPS 20111), study...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Nichole Rosamilia; Ted Gragson; Christopher Boone; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Michael R. Haines; EcoTrends Project (2015). Konza Prairie site, station Lyon County, KS (FIPS 20111), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F10163%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Nichole Rosamilia; Ted Gragson; Christopher Boone; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Michael R. Haines; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1870 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Konza Prairie (KNZ) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  16. d

    2019 Cartographic Boundary KML, 2010 Urban Areas (UA) within 2010 County and...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jan 15, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2021). 2019 Cartographic Boundary KML, 2010 Urban Areas (UA) within 2010 County and Equivalent for Kansas, 1:500,000 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/2019-cartographic-boundary-kml-2010-urban-areas-ua-within-2010-county-and-equivalent-for-kansas
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 15, 2021
    Area covered
    Kansas
    Description

    The 2019 cartographic boundary KMLs are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The records in this file allow users to map the parts of Urban Areas that overlap a particular county. After each decennial census, the Census Bureau delineates urban areas that represent densely developed territory, encompassing residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. In general, this territory consists of areas of high population density and urban land use resulting in a representation of the ""urban footprint."" There are two types of urban areas: urbanized areas (UAs) that contain 50,000 or more people and urban clusters (UCs) that contain at least 2,500 people, but fewer than 50,000 people (except in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam which each contain urban clusters with populations greater than 50,000). Each urban area is identified by a 5-character numeric census code that may contain leading zeroes. The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The generalized boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2010.

  17. Data from: Konza Prairie site, station Pottawatomie County, KS (FIPS 20149),...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Nichole Rosamilia; Michael R. Haines; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Ted Gragson; Christopher Boone; EcoTrends Project (2015). Konza Prairie site, station Pottawatomie County, KS (FIPS 20149), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F10185%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Nichole Rosamilia; Michael R. Haines; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Ted Gragson; Christopher Boone; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1860 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Konza Prairie (KNZ) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  18. Konza Prairie site, station Chautauqua County, KS (FIPS 20019), study of...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Nichole Rosamilia; Ted Gragson; Christopher Boone; Michael R. Haines; EcoTrends Project (2015). Konza Prairie site, station Chautauqua County, KS (FIPS 20019), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F10108%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Nichole Rosamilia; Ted Gragson; Christopher Boone; Michael R. Haines; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1880 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Konza Prairie (KNZ) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  19. BNS01 Nematodes density and composition in the Belowground Plot Experiment...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Jan 24, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Timothy Todd (2023). BNS01 Nematodes density and composition in the Belowground Plot Experiment at Konza Prairie [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fknb-lter-knz%2F19%2F10
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 24, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Timothy Todd
    Time period covered
    Jun 1, 1987 - Oct 1, 1994
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    N, P, ID, Mow, Burn, Block, Total, RecYear, Omnivores, Fungivores, and 2 more
    Description

    The effects of burning, mowing, and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilization on the trophic structure of a tallgrass prairie nematode community were examined in a long-term field experiment established in 1986. Nematode densities and trophic composition were determined in October of 1987, 1989, and 1994 following 2, 4, and 9 years of treatment, respectively.

  20. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Spatial Data Collection and Products Branch (Publisher) (2022). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2021, State, Kansas, Census Tracts [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2021-state-kansas-census-tracts
Organization logo

TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2021, State, Kansas, Census Tracts

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Nov 1, 2022
Dataset provided by
United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
Area covered
Kansas
Description

The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Census tracts are small, relatively permanent statistical subdivisions of a county or equivalent entity, and were defined by local participants as part of the 2020 Census Participant Statistical Areas Program. The Census Bureau delineated the census tracts in situations where no local participant existed or where all the potential participants declined to participate. The primary purpose of census tracts is to provide a stable set of geographic units for the presentation of census data and comparison back to previous decennial censuses. Census tracts generally have a population size between 1,200 and 8,000 people, with an optimum size of 4,000 people. When first delineated, census tracts were designed to be homogeneous with respect to population characteristics, economic status, and living conditions. The spatial size of census tracts varies widely depending on the density of settlement. Physical changes in street patterns caused by highway construction, new development, and so forth, may require boundary revisions. In addition, census tracts occasionally are split due to population growth, or combined as a result of substantial population decline. Census tract boundaries generally follow visible and identifiable features. They may follow legal boundaries such as minor civil division (MCD) or incorporated place boundaries in some States and situations to allow for census tract-to-governmental unit relationships where the governmental boundaries tend to remain unchanged between censuses. State and county boundaries always are census tract boundaries in the standard census geographic hierarchy. In a few rare instances, a census tract may consist of noncontiguous areas. These noncontiguous areas may occur where the census tracts are coextensive with all or parts of legal entities that are themselves noncontiguous. For the 2010 Census and beyond, the census tract code range of 9400 through 9499 was enforced for census tracts that include a majority American Indian population according to Census 2000 data and/or their area was primarily covered by federally recognized American Indian reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands; the code range 9800 through 9899 was enforced for those census tracts that contained little or no population and represented a relatively large special land use area such as a National Park, military installation, or a business/industrial park; and the code range 9900 through 9998 was enforced for those census tracts that contained only water area, no land area.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu