3 datasets found
  1. f

    Top average annual coccidioidomycosis cases and incidence rates (per 100,000...

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 3, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ramon E. Guevara; Tasneem Motala; Dawn Terashita (2023). Top average annual coccidioidomycosis cases and incidence rates (per 100,000 people) in California, 2001–2011 and 2008–2011. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136753.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 3, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Ramon E. Guevara; Tasneem Motala; Dawn Terashita
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    California
    Description

    Ranks are based on case counts and incidence rates of California counties. Antelope Valley, not a county but a large part of Los Angeles County, is included to demonstrate how high incidence rate can be within LA County. Compared to the 57 other counties in California during 2001–2011, LA County had the third highest average annual number of cases and Antelope Valley had a higher incidence rate than all but six counties.*Counties not part of the Central California Valley are Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo, San Diego, Riverside, Ventura, Orange, San Bernardino, Monterey, Santa Clara, and Santa Barbara.Top average annual coccidioidomycosis cases and incidence rates (per 100,000 people) in California, 2001–2011 and 2008–2011.

  2. p

    Lancaster, CA Real Estate Investment Insights

    • propertygenie.us
    Updated Jul 14, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    PropertyGenie (2025). Lancaster, CA Real Estate Investment Insights [Dataset]. https://www.propertygenie.us/market-insight/lancaster-ca
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 14, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    PropertyGenie
    License

    https://www.propertygenie.us/terms-conditionshttps://www.propertygenie.us/terms-conditions

    Time period covered
    May 31, 2025
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    Population, Rental Count, Job Growth (%), LTR Genie Score, STR Genie Score, Income Growth (%), Rental Demand Score, LTR Monthly Cash Flow, Population Growth (%), STR Monthly Cash Flow, and 6 more
    Description

    The LTR Genie Score of Lancaster, CA is 63 and STR Genie Score is 46, indicating a moderate level of attractiveness for long-term rental investment and a lower level for short-term rental investment. The higher LTR Genie Score can be attributed to the decent LTR Rentability, positive LTR Net ROI, and steady LTR Rent Growth Rate. On the other hand, the lower STR Genie Score may be due to the lower STR Net ROI and occupancy rate. Lancaster, CA is a city located in the Antelope Valley region of Los Angeles County, known for its affordable housing market and proximity to major highways and transportation hubs. The city has seen steady population growth in recent years, making it a potentially attractive market for real estate investors.Considering the metrics provided, Lancaster, CA may be more suitable for long-term rental investment due to the higher LTR Genie Score and positive indicators such as LTR Net ROI. However, investors should also consider the potential for short-term rental investment in the area, especially if they can capitalize on the city's growing population and tourism industry. Ultimately, a diversified investment strategy that includes both long-term and short-term rentals could be beneficial in this market.

  3. d

    California Pronghorn Lassen Migration Corridors

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Jul 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). California Pronghorn Lassen Migration Corridors [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/california-pronghorn-lassen-migration-corridors
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Area covered
    Lassen County
    Description

    The Lassen herd winters in lower elevations in the Secret Valley, Bull Flat, and the Five Springs Wilderness Study Area north of the Skedaddle Mountains and east of Shaffer Mountain, as well as in the Dry Valley Rim Wilderness Study Area. Summer ranges are spread out, with some individuals migrating north to the Madeline Plains and others heading west to Willow Creek Valley, Grasshopper Valley, and Eagle Lake (fig. XXX). An unknown portion of the herd are better characterized as residents. The primary threat to pronghorn in the Lassen herd is the conversion of perennial shrublands to exotic annual grasslands following wildfires. The 2012 Rush Fire burned 271,911 acres in Lassen County within the boundary of the Lassen herd, expanding invasive annual grasslands with altered fire regimes which increase fire frequency and promote the further expansion of exotic grasses. Overabundant free-roaming equids, feral horses and burros, regularly exceed the appropriate management level of the Twin Peaks Herd Management Area, thereby reducing forage and water available for pronghorn. The expansion of juniper into the shrub steppe limits the amount of forage available for pronghorn while increasing the risk of mountain lion predation. The population has been stable to slightly increasing since the 1992-1993 winter die off in northeast California, averaging 974 animals counted during aerial winter surveys (B. Ehler, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, written commun., 2023). CDFW is planning to mark 35 pronghorn with GPS collars in winter 2024 to estimate the population using mark resight surveys. These mapping layers show the location of the migration corridors for pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) in the Lassen population in California. They were developed from 14 migration sequences collected from a sample size of 7 animals comprising GPS locations collected every 1-6 hours.

  4. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Ramon E. Guevara; Tasneem Motala; Dawn Terashita (2023). Top average annual coccidioidomycosis cases and incidence rates (per 100,000 people) in California, 2001–2011 and 2008–2011. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136753.t002

Top average annual coccidioidomycosis cases and incidence rates (per 100,000 people) in California, 2001–2011 and 2008–2011.

Related Article
Explore at:
xlsAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 3, 2023
Dataset provided by
PLOS ONE
Authors
Ramon E. Guevara; Tasneem Motala; Dawn Terashita
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Area covered
California
Description

Ranks are based on case counts and incidence rates of California counties. Antelope Valley, not a county but a large part of Los Angeles County, is included to demonstrate how high incidence rate can be within LA County. Compared to the 57 other counties in California during 2001–2011, LA County had the third highest average annual number of cases and Antelope Valley had a higher incidence rate than all but six counties.*Counties not part of the Central California Valley are Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo, San Diego, Riverside, Ventura, Orange, San Bernardino, Monterey, Santa Clara, and Santa Barbara.Top average annual coccidioidomycosis cases and incidence rates (per 100,000 people) in California, 2001–2011 and 2008–2011.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu