The number of inhabitants living in Campeche amounted to approximately 950,500 in 2022. This represents an increase in comparison to the amount reported in 2020. The state of Campeche is one of the least populated regions in Mexico.

Mexico Population: Campeche data was reported at 958.852 Person th in 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 941.956 Person th for 2017. Mexico Population: Campeche data is updated yearly, averaging 617.379 Person th from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2018, with 49 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 958.852 Person th in 2018 and a record low of 262.217 Person th in 1970. Mexico Population: Campeche data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Population Council. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.G002: Population: by State.

As of 2020, the Mexican state of Campeche accommodated a population of approximately ******* inhabitants. The gender distribution among the residents was relatively equal, with women comprising ****% and men making up ****% of the total population.

Mexico Population: Male: Campeche data was reported at 473.756 Person th in 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 465.318 Person th for 2017. Mexico Population: Male: Campeche data is updated yearly, averaging 311.220 Person th from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2018, with 49 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 473.756 Person th in 2018 and a record low of 132.150 Person th in 1970. Mexico Population: Male: Campeche data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Population Council. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.G002: Population: by State.

In 2020, the population in non-family households in Campeche amounted to about ****** people. Between 2000 and 2020, the population rose by approximately ****** people.

The rate per 100,000 inhabitants who heard from acquaintances about corruption in Campeche stood at approximately ****** in 2023. Between 2013 and 2023, the rate rose by around ******, though the increase followed an uneven trajectory rather than a consistent upward trend.

4,77,987 (Persons) in 2018. All the people who reside in the country at the time of the interview, whether domestic or foreign. It includes Mexican diplomats functioning overseas and family members residing with them, those who cross the border daily to work in another country, and homeless population. Do not include foreigners who do office or diplomatic work in the country or their families. Until 1900 Quintana Roo was included in Yucatan, Baja California Sur was included in Baja California. Figures for the following census dates: October 20 (1895), October 28 (1900), October 27 (1910), November 30 (1920), May 15 (1930), March 6 (1940), June 6 (1950), June 8 (1960), January 28 (1970), June 4 (1980), March 12 (1990), November 5 (1995), February 14 (2000), 19 October (2005) and June 12 (2010).

0,62 (%) in 2017. zero represents- the lowest income per capita, lowest educational attainment, and highest TFR observed across all GBD geographies from 1970 to 2016, and one represents the highest income per capita, highest educational attainment, and lowest TFR.

Mexico Average Years in School: Population: 15 Years & Above: Female: Campeche data was reported at 9.520 Year in 2020. This records an increase from the previous number of 8.940 Year for 2015. Mexico Average Years in School: Population: 15 Years & Above: Female: Campeche data is updated yearly, averaging 8.630 Year from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2020, with 4 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 9.520 Year in 2020 and a record low of 6.710 Year in 2000. Mexico Average Years in School: Population: 15 Years & Above: Female: Campeche data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Institute of Statistics and Geography. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.G016: Education Statistics: Age 15 and Above.

state of Campeche. name, type, Area, capital city, Country, continent, population

2,0 (Percent) in 2010. All the people who reside in the country at the time of the interview, whether domestic or foreign. It includes Mexican diplomats functioning overseas and family members residing with them, those who cross the border daily to work in another country, and homeless population. Do not include foreigners who do office or diplomatic work in the country or their families. Until 1900 Quintana Roo was included in Yucatan, Baja California Sur was included in Baja California. Figures for the following census dates: October 20 (1895), October 28 (1900), October 27 (1910), November 30 (1920), May 15 (1930), March 6 (1940), June 6 (1950), June 8 (1960), January 28 (1970), June 4 (1980), March 12 (1990), November 5 (1995), February 14 (2000), 19 October (2005) and June 12 (2010).

38.8 (Percent) in 2022. The number of people aged 0-14 per hundred economically productive population (15-64 years). The calculation excludes unspecified age group. Figures for the following census dates: February 14 (2000), 17 October (2005) and June 12 (2010).

人口：女性：坎佩切在12-01-2018达485.096千人，相较于12-01-2017的476.638千人有所增长。人口：女性：坎佩切数据按年更新，12-01-1970至12-01-2018期间平均值为306.159千人，共49份观测结果。该数据的历史最高值出现于12-01-2018，达485.096千人，而历史最低值则出现于12-01-1970，为130.067千人。CEIC提供的人口：女性：坎佩切数据处于定期更新的状态，数据来源于Consejo Nacional de Poblacion，数据归类于全球数据库的墨西哥 – 表 MX.G002：人口：按州划分。

78,4 (years) in 2024. Age that divides the population into two numerically equal parts, i.e. the age which collects 50% of the population. Figures for the following census dates: February 14 (2000), 17 October (2005) and June 12 (2010).

Resolving natal populations for juvenile green turtles is challenging given their potential for extensive dispersal during the oceanic stage and ontogenetic shifts among nursery habitats. Mitochondrial DNA markers have elucidated patterns of connectivity between green turtle nesting populations (rookeries) and juvenile foraging aggregations. However, missing rookery baseline data and haplotype sharing among populations have often impeded inferences, including estimating origins of Gulf of Mexico juveniles. Here, we assessed genetic structure among seven foraging aggregations spanning southern Texas (TX) to southwestern Florida (SWFL), including Port Fourchon, Louisiana (LA); a surface-pelagic aggregation (SP) offshore of Louisiana and Florida; Santa Rosa Island, Florida (SRI); St. Joseph Bay, Florida (SJB); and the Big Bend region, Florida (BB). We estimated source contributions to aggregations with novel genetic data (excluding SP and BB) using a Bayesian many-to-one mixed stock analysis (MSA) approach. Haplotype frequencies for western (TX, LA, SP, SRI) and eastern (SJB, BB, SWFL) aggregations were significantly differentiated. The largest shift in haplotype frequencies between proximal nursery sites occurred between SRI and SJB, separated by only 150 km, highlighting the lack of a geographic yardstick for predicting genetic structure. In contrast to previous MSA results, there was no signal of Florida juveniles at any foraging site. Mexican contributions dominated in all aggregations, with strong connectivity between western Bay of Campeche (Tamaulipas/Veracruz) rookeries and western foraging aggregations. MSA indicated more diverse Mexican origins for eastern aggregations, with larger inputs from the eastern Bay of Campeche (Campeche/Yucatán), Campeche Bank, and Quintana Roo rookeries. These results demonstrate the significance of the Gulf of Mexico coast and offshore waters of the United States as important nursery habitat for green turtles of Mexican origin and highlight the need for international coordination for management of these populations.

Original provider: Eduardo Cuevas

Dataset credits: Data provider Grupo de trabajo para la tortuga carey (Mexico) Originating data center Satellite Tracking and Analysis Tool (STAT) Project partner This study represents a collaboration between the Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia (UNAM), ProNatura Peninsula de Yucatan, Comision Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas (SEMARNAT), Laguna de Terminos- Area de Proteccion de Flora y Fauna, Chelonia Inc (Puerto Rico), and NOAA. Project sponsor or sponsor description This project (CAMP-2005-C01-046) is financed jointly by the Campeche State Government and the Mexican National Science and Technology Council (CONACYT). Further support from NOAA, which we thankfully acknowledge, has permitted us to extend the scope of the initial project.

Abstract: The hawksbill population that nests in the Yucatan Peninsula (Mexico) is considered the largest in the Atlantic and one of the four largest in the world. However, from about 6,400 registered annual number of nests in 1999 (when the Mexican population represented about 43% of all recorded hawksbill nests in the Greater Caribbean), the population's reproductive output dropped to less than 2,400 nests/yr by 2004. No single cause has been demonstrated but as major nesting sites are under protection this alarming decline (a drop of 63% in 5 years) is suspected to be associated with threats impacting the species at foraging grounds or migratory routes. Unfortunately not only has there been no capacity to study and protect these habitats but, with the exception of studies by Byles and Swimmer (1994) and Garduño et al. (2003), there is also insufficient information on the routes taken and foraging destinations for the various rookeries in the region. To address these issues, the current satellite tracking project was instrumented to reveal the post-nesting migratory behavior of hawksbills in the Yucatan Peninsula, starting in 2006 with animals nesting in Campeche State, where about 50% of the reproductive output by the species in the whole Peninsula is concentrated.

Knowledge on the migratory routes and foraging sites will be helpful in identifying and mitigating potential threats in the marine habitats and for the establishment of research programs on the status of the habitats themselves. Furthermore, discovering whether or not these lie within or outside Mexican territorial waters has important consequences for the management strategies. If they are inside, the responsibility for addressing the hawksbills' conservation needs is totally Mexico's. If, on the other hand, some or all of the turtles cross into international waters or into other countries' jurisdictions it would indicate an internationally shared responsibility.

Future studies by the group will be directed towards tracking hawksbills nesting in the two other sates using similar techniques and learning from the lessons obtained from this season's experience.

Literature cited
Byles, R. A. and Swimmer, Y. B. 1994. Post-nesting migration of Eretmocheyls imbricata in the Yucatán Península. In: K. A. Bjorndal, A. B. Bolten, D. A. Johnson and P. J. Eliazar (compilers). 1994. Proc. Fourteenth Ann. Symp. Sea Turtle Biol. and Cons. NMFS-SEFSC-351. p. 202.

Garduño-Andrade, M., Schroeder, B. Balazs, G. and Lope, R. 2003. Migration and dive behavior of female hawksbills (Eretmochelys imbricata) in the Yucatan Peninsula. In: Seminoff, J. A. Compiler, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-503, p. 285

Original provider: Eduardo Cuevas

Dataset credits: Data provider Grupo de trabajo para la tortuga carey (Mexico) Originating data center Satellite Tracking and Analysis Tool (STAT) Project partner This study represents a collaboration between the Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia (UNAM), ProNatura Peninsula de Yucatan, Comision Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas (SEMARNAT), Laguna de Terminos- Area de Proteccion de Flora y Fauna, Chelonia Inc (Puerto Rico), and NOAA. Project sponsor or sponsor description This project (CAMP-2005-C01-046) is financed jointly by the Campeche State Government and the Mexican National Science and Technology Council (CONACYT). Further support from NOAA, which we thankfully acknowledge, has permitted us to extend the scope of the initial project.

Abstract: The hawksbill population that nests in the Yucatan Peninsula (Mexico) is considered the largest in the Atlantic and one of the four largest in the world. However, from about 6,400 registered annual number of nests in 1999 (when the Mexican population represented about 43% of all recorded hawksbill nests in the Greater Caribbean), the population's reproductive output dropped to less than 2,400 nests/yr by 2004. No single cause has been demonstrated but as major nesting sites are under protection this alarming decline (a drop of 63% in 5 years) is suspected to be associated with threats impacting the species at foraging grounds or migratory routes. Unfortunately not only has there been no capacity to study and protect these habitats but, with the exception of studies by Byles and Swimmer (1994) and Garduño et al. (2003), there is also insufficient information on the routes taken and foraging destinations for the various rookeries in the region. To address these issues, the current satellite tracking project was instrumented to reveal the post-nesting migratory behavior of hawksbills in the Yucatan Peninsula, starting in 2006 with animals nesting in Campeche State, where about 50% of the reproductive output by the species in the whole Peninsula is concentrated.

Knowledge on the migratory routes and foraging sites will be helpful in identifying and mitigating potential threats in the marine habitats and for the establishment of research programs on the status of the habitats themselves. Furthermore, discovering whether or not these lie within or outside Mexican territorial waters has important consequences for the management strategies. If they are inside, the responsibility for addressing the hawksbills' conservation needs is totally Mexico's. If, on the other hand, some or all of the turtles cross into international waters or into other countries' jurisdictions it would indicate an internationally shared responsibility.

Future studies by the group will be directed towards tracking hawksbills nesting in the two other sates using similar techniques and learning from the lessons obtained from this season's experience.

Literature cited
Byles, R. A. and Swimmer, Y. B. 1994. Post-nesting migration of Eretmocheyls imbricata in the Yucatán Península. In: K. A. Bjorndal, A. B. Bolten, D. A. Johnson and P. J. Eliazar (compilers). 1994. Proc. Fourteenth Ann. Symp. Sea Turtle Biol. and Cons. NMFS-SEFSC-351. p. 202.

Garduño-Andrade, M., Schroeder, B. Balazs, G. and Lope, R. 2003. Migration and dive behavior of female hawksbills (Eretmochelys imbricata) in the Yucatan Peninsula. In: Seminoff, J. A. Compiler, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-503, p. 285

Supplemental information: Visit STAT's project page for additional information.

This dataset is a summarized representation of the telemetry locations aggregated per species per 1-degree cell.

Patterns of genetic variation reflect interactions among microevolutionary forces that vary in strength with changing demography. For marine species, these patterns are often interpreted under the expectation that larval movement drives connectivity because most marine species exhibit broadcast spawning dispersal strategies. Here, patterns of variation within and among samples of the mouth brooding gafftopsail catfish (Bagre marinus, Family Ariidae) captured in the U.S Atlantic and throughout the Gulf of Mexico were analyzed using genomics to generate neutral and non-neutral SNP data sets. Because genomic resources are lacking for ariids, linkage disequilibrium network analysis was used to examine patterns of putatively adaptive variation. Finally, historical demographic parameters were estimated from site frequency spectra. The results show four differentiated groups, corresponding to the (1) U.S. Atlantic, and the (2) northeastern, (3) northwestern, and (4) southern Gulf of Mexico. Pa..., Sampling and library prep Fin clips were obtained from 382 mixed-age samples of gafftopsail catfish collected from nine geographic sampling locations (hereafter locations; Figure 1) from 2015 to 2018: one in the Atlantic in Indian River Lagoon, Florida and adjacent coastal waters (ATL) and eight in the Gulf. Locations in the Gulf were near Tampa Bay, Florida (FLGS), North of Tampa Bay, Florida (FLGN), near Mobile Bay, Alabama, (MB), in Mississippi Sound, Mississippi (MISS), in Chandeleur Sound, LA (CS), off Louisiana west of the Mississippi River (LA), in Corpus Christi Bay, Texas (CC) and in the Bay of Campeche, Mexico (CAMP). All locations were selected because they represent inshore habitats used by mouth brooding males for parturition and by juveniles as nursery habitat, except CAMP which was opportunistically sampled further offshore. Sampling took place as part of surveys routinely conducted by state or academic entities, the latter following approved animal care protocols. All fi..., , # Complex patterns of genetic population structure in the mouthbrooding marine catfish, Bagre marinus, in the Gulf of Mexico and U.S. Atlantic

https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.nvx0k6f0n

The three genepop files consist of a complete dataset as well as the dataset split into neutral and outlier loci. A metadata text file is also included to describe the catch locations of the samples.

Description of the data and file structure

The complete genepop dataset (BMA_by_pop_genepop.gen) consisted of 367 gafftopsail catfish (Bagre marinus, Family Ariidae) samples genotyped at 5,554 microhaplotype loci (14,682 SNPs) collected from the western North Atlantic Ocean ranging from Indian River Lagoon, Florida to the Bay of Campeche, Mexico. The neutral genepop file (BMA_by_pop_only-neutral_genepop.gen) is a subset of the complete file which contains 5,421 loci while the outlier genepop (BMA_by_pop_all-outl_genepop.gen) contains 133 loci. The sample names f...,

Resolving natal populations for juvenile green turtles is challenging given their potential for extensive dispersal during the oceanic stage and ontogenetic shifts among nursery habitats. Mitochondrial DNA markers have elucidated patterns of connectivity between green turtle nesting populations (rookeries) and juvenile foraging aggregations. However, missing rookery baseline data and haplotype sharing among populations have often impeded inferences, including estimating origins of Gulf of Mexico juveniles. Here, we assessed genetic structure among seven foraging aggregations spanning southern Texas (TX) to southwestern Florida (SWFL), including Port Fourchon, Louisiana (LA); a surface-pelagic aggregation (SP) offshore of Louisiana and Florida; Santa Rosa Island, Florida (SRI); St. Joseph Bay, Florida (SJB); and the Big Bend region, Florida (BB). We estimated source contributions to aggregations with novel genetic data (excluding SP and BB) using a Bayesian many-to-one mixed stock analysis (MSA) approach. Haplotype frequencies for western (TX, LA, SP, SRI) and eastern (SJB, BB, SWFL) aggregations were significantly differentiated. The largest shift in haplotype frequencies between proximal nursery sites occurred between SRI and SJB, separated by only 150 km, highlighting the lack of a geographic yardstick for predicting genetic structure. In contrast to previous MSA results, there was no signal of Florida juveniles at any foraging site. Mexican contributions dominated in all aggregations, with strong connectivity between western Bay of Campeche (Tamaulipas/Veracruz) rookeries and western foraging aggregations. MSA indicated more diverse Mexican origins for eastern aggregations, with larger inputs from the eastern Bay of Campeche (Campeche/Yucatán), Campeche Bank, and Quintana Roo rookeries. These results demonstrate the significance of the Gulf of Mexico coast and offshore waters of the United States as important nursery habitat for green turtles of Mexican origin and highlight the need for international coordination for management of these populations.

Mexico Number of Emigrants: Campeche data was reported at 2.142 Person th in 2015. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.296 Person th for 2010. Mexico Number of Emigrants: Campeche data is updated yearly, averaging 1.985 Person th from Dec 1975 (Median) to 2015, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.546 Person th in 2000 and a record low of 0.710 Person th in 1975. Mexico Number of Emigrants: Campeche data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Population Council. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.G007: Number of Emigrants.