- s
Output Area Boundaries: Doncaster, England, 2001
- searchworks.stanford.edu
zipUpdated Oct 29, 2024+ more versions
Share
Facebook
Twitter
EmailClick to copy linkLink copiedCite(2024). Output Area Boundaries: Doncaster, England, 2001 [Dataset]. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/th947bd4613zipAvailable download formatsDataset updatedOct 29, 2024Area coveredDoncaster, EnglandDescriptionThis dataset is intended for researchers, students, and policy makers for reference and mapping purposes, and may be used for basic applications such as viewing, querying, and map output production, or to provide a basemap to support graphical overlays and analysis with other spatial data.
- d
2014 town and community profile for Doncaster (Suburb)
- data.gov.au
xlsxUpdated Jul 3, 2016+ more versionsShareFacebookTwitterEmailClick to copy linkLink copiedCiteDepartment of Health and Human Services (2016). 2014 town and community profile for Doncaster (Suburb) [Dataset]. https://data.gov.au/dataset/ds-vic-4d761bad-6937-4e4c-93c8-968d5dd71f05xlsxAvailable download formatsDataset updatedJul 3, 2016Dataset provided byDepartment of Health and Human ServicesLicenseAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automaticallyDescriptionThe 2014 Town and Community Profiles bring together information on more than 1000 Victorian communities from a wide variety of sources, both internal and external to the Department of Health and …Show full descriptionThe 2014 Town and Community Profiles bring together information on more than 1000 Victorian communities from a wide variety of sources, both internal and external to the Department of Health and Department of Human Services. The Profiles include information on population, geography, services and facilities, and social, cultural and demographic characteristics of each suburb, town and rural catchment in Victoria.
- f
Inputs (.csv spreadsheets) for 'Conservation implications of a mismatch...
- figshare.com
txtUpdated Jun 10, 2023ShareFacebookTwitterEmailClick to copy linkLink copiedCiteAlex Nicol-Harper; C. Patrick Doncaster; Geoff M. Hilton; Kevin Wood; Thomas Ezard (2023). Inputs (.csv spreadsheets) for 'Conservation implications of a mismatch between data availability and demographic impact' [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16832686.v2txtAvailable download formatsUnique identifierhttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16832686.v2Dataset updatedJun 10, 2023Dataset provided byfigshareAuthorsAlex Nicol-Harper; C. Patrick Doncaster; Geoff M. Hilton; Kevin Wood; Thomas EzardLicenseAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automaticallyDescriptionThis dataset contains estimates of the following vital rates (as required to parameterise matrix population models), for the common eider (Somateria mollissima): 1st year survival (measured either from hatching, or from fledging, to 1 year old); 2nd year survival; adult annual survival; first breeding (both age-specific recruitment probability, and breeding propensity across potential recruitment ages); breeding propensity of established female breeders; clutch size; hatching success; and fledging success. These estimates are drawn from 134 studies, across the scientific and grey literature – including three previously inaccessible datasets on clutch size that were contributed in response to a call for data through the IUCN Species Survival Commission’s Duck Specialist Group (IDs 127, A and B). This is a relational database, linking estimates and associated metadata to the relevant study (or unique unpublished combination thereof) by a unique ID number in the 'MASTER' sheet. The files in this dataset closely correspond to those in the Dryad datatset linked below, with minor edits to facilitate their use in meta-analysis (see details in the README here). For further information, refer to the Dryad database (linked below), the Ecological Solutions and Evidence publication associated with that database (https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12108), or the pre-print entitled 'Conservation implications of a mismatch between data availability and demographic impact' (DOI: 10.22541/au.165337565.54669681/v1), which uses these inputs. There is also a 'probability matrix' .csv file, used for the background of pre-print Figure 4 (to be read into the output code), and equivalent plots for pre-print Appendix D (to be read into the comparative code).
** 2023/02/20 edits - to MASTER, hs, and README - reflect minor corrections to the underlying Dryad database **
Proven reoffending statistics quarterly: October 2012 to September 2013
- gov.uk
Updated Jul 31, 2015+ more versionsShareFacebookTwitterEmailClick to copy linkLink copiedCiteMinistry of Justice (2015). Proven reoffending statistics quarterly: October 2012 to September 2013 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/proven-reoffending-statistics-quarterly-october-2012-to-september-2013Dataset updatedJul 31, 2015AuthorsMinistry of JusticeDescriptionThis publication provides key statistics relating to the reoffending of offenders who were released from custody, received a non-custodial conviction at court, or received a caution, reprimand or warning.
Latest figures for the year October 2012 to September 2013 are provided and compared to the same period a year ago. Trends going back to 2002 are also presented. Also included are Interim reconviction figures for Peterborough and Doncaster Payment by Results pilots, and employment and reoffending PbR pilot outcomes.
Two consultations are also published at the same time as the Proven Reoffending bulletin, one of which seeks views on proposals to changes of the presentation to the data in reoffending statistics after October 2017.
The second consultation seeks views on proposed changes to the prison population projections publication.
The bulletin is produced and handled by the ministry’s analytical professionals and production staff.
Pre-release access of up to 24 hours is granted to the following persons:
Proven Re-offending Statistics Quarterly Bulletin
Ministry of Justice: Secretary of State, Ministers of State, Permanent Secretary, Director General of Criminal Justice Group, Director General of Finance, Director of Sentencing and Rehabilitation, Director of Analytical Services, Deputy Director, Head of Justice Statistics Analytical Services, Deputy Director for Reducing Reoffending, Deputy Director, Head of Sentencing Policy and Penalties Unit, Programme Director of Youth Justice Statistics, Head of Prison, Probation, Re-offending and PbR Statistics, Director General of National Offender Management Service (NOMS), Deputy Director, Head of Planning and Analysis Group (NOMS), Deputy Director, Head of Offender Management and Public Protection Group (NOMS), Head of Public Protection Casework Section (NOMS), Head of NOMS Population Strategy (NOMS), Head of Statistics, Performance, Information and Analysis Group (NOMS), Head of Performance Assessment and Research Unit (NOMS), Head of Safer Custody and Litigation, Equalities, Rights and Decency Group (NOMS) and the relevant special advisers, analysts, policy officers and press officers.
Home Office: Secretary of State, Ministers of State, Permanent Secretary, and relevant special advisers, analysts and policy officers.
No 10: Special adviser to the Prime Minister
Deputy PM’s Office: Special adviser to the Deputy Prime Minister
Treasury: Home and Legal Team, Public Services Group
Annex A - Interim re-conviction figures for Peterborough and Doncaster Payment by Results pilots
In addition to those listed for the Proven Re-offending statistical bulletin, pre-release access of up to 24 hours to Annex A only is also granted to one official from each of the service providers for the Doncaster and Peterborough pilots respectively, Serco and Social Finance.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
FacebookTwitterEmailThis dataset is intended for researchers, students, and policy makers for reference and mapping purposes, and may be used for basic applications such as viewing, querying, and map output production, or to provide a basemap to support graphical overlays and analysis with other spatial data.