CONTENT

This dataset contains data on key indicators of world's top 6 Economies (by GDP) which includes USA, China, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, India between the time interval of 30 years from 1990 to 2020. Data scraped from World Bank Data website and processed using Python Pandas library. This dataset could be used to do Time Series Analysis and Forecasting.

Code notebook:

https://deepnote.com/workspace/charan-chandrasekaran-9b7f-9e1375d3-f150-44ca-a9fb-feb08a1e8585/project/Data-extraction-from-World-bank-data-on-Top-6-Economies-2cdf8112-d412-4044-a58e-5e464804e9b6

INDICATORS

1. GDP (current US$)
2. GDP, PPP (current international $)
3. GDP per capita (current US$)
4. GDP growth (annual %)
5. Imports of goods and services (% of GDP)
6. Exports of goods and services (% of GDP)
7. Central government debt, total (% of GDP)
8. Total reserves (includes gold, current US$)
9. Unemployment, total (% of total labor force) (modelled ILO estimate)
10. Inflation, consumer prices (annual %)
11. Personal remittances, received (% of GDP)
12. Population, total
13. Population growth (annual %)
14. Life expectancy at birth, total (years)
15. Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) (% of population)

SOURCE

The World Bank : https://data.worldbank.org/country

TThe ERS International Macroeconomic Data Set provides historical and projected data for 181 countries that account for more than 99 percent of the world economy. These data and projections are assembled explicitly to serve as underlying assumptions for the annual USDA agricultural supply and demand projections, which provide a 10-year outlook on U.S. and global agriculture. The macroeconomic projections describe the long-term, 10-year scenario that is used as a benchmark for analyzing the impacts of alternative scenarios and macroeconomic shocks.

Explore the International Macroeconomic Data Set 2015 for annual growth rates, consumer price indices, real GDP per capita, exchange rates, and more. Get detailed projections and forecasts for countries worldwide.

Annual growth rates, Consumer price indices (CPI), Real GDP per capita, Real exchange rates, Population, GDP deflator, Real gross domestic product (GDP), Real GDP shares, GDP, projections, Forecast, Real Estate, Per capita, Deflator, share, Exchange Rates, CPI

Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Côte d'Ivoire, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Samoa, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe, WORLD Follow data.kapsarc.org for timely data to advance energy economics research. Notes:

Developed countries/1 Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Other Western Europe, European Union 27, North America

Developed countries less USA/2 Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Other Western Europe, European Union 27, Canada

Developing countries/3 Africa, Middle East, Other Oceania, Asia less Japan, Latin America;

Low-income developing countries/4 Haiti, Afghanistan, Nepal, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zimbabwe;

Emerging markets/5 Mexico, Brazil, Chile, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Russia, China, India, Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore

BRIICs/5 Brazil, Russia, India, Indonesia, China; Former Centrally Planned Economies

Former centrally planned economies/7 Cyprus, Malta, Recently acceded countries, Other Central Europe, Former Soviet Union

USMCA/8 Canada, Mexico, United States

Europe and Central Asia/9 Europe, Former Soviet Union

Middle East and North Africa/10 Middle East and North Africa

Other Southeast Asia outlook/11 Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam

Other South America outlook/12 Chile, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay

Indicator Source

Real gross domestic product (GDP) World Bank World Development Indicators, IHS Global Insight, Oxford Economics Forecasting, as well as estimated and projected values developed by the Economic Research Service all converted to a 2015 base year.

Real GDP per capita U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Macroeconomic Data Set, GDP table and Population table.

GDP deflator World Bank World Development Indicators, IHS Global Insight, Oxford Economics Forecasting, as well as estimated and projected values developed by the Economic Research Service, all converted to a 2015 base year.

Real GDP shares U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Macroeconomic Data Set, GDP table.

Real exchange rates U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Macroeconomic Data Set, CPI table, and Nominal XR and Trade Weights tables developed by the Economic Research Service.

Consumer price indices (CPI) International Financial Statistics International Monetary Fund, IHS Global Insight, Oxford Economics Forecasting, as well as estimated and projected values developed by the Economic Research Service, all converted to a 2015 base year.

Population Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, International Data Base.

Dataset

This dataset was created by Ruslan

Released under Data files © Original Authors

Contents

The chemical components of exotic plants can change after invasion as they adapt to local conditions. Studying these changes is important because they can have a marked effect on ecosystem processes and dynamics. We examined the leaf and litter chemistry of exotic goldenrods (Solidago altissima) that invaded Japan from the USA approximately 100 years ago. We investigated how changes in leaf chemistry caused by herbivory by the exotic lace bug (Corythucha marmorata) affected litter decomposition rates in three native (USA) and three exotic (Japanese) populations under semi-natural experimental conditions. In both native and invasive goldenrods, populations in areas where lace bugs were absent or present at low densities had lower foliar phenolic concentrations (defensive compounds) than populations in areas where lace bugs were abundant. The observed pattern of reduced herbivory (i.e., stronger resistance) in lace bug-abundant areas suggests that an increase in defensive compounds may be..., , # Exotic herbivores indirectly decelerate litter decomposition via increased resistance to herbivory in exotic plants

Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.p2ngf1w4r

Description of the data and file structure

This dataset accompanies the article “Exotic herbivores indirectly decelerate litter decomposition via increased resistance to herbivory in exotic plants†(Katayama et al. 2025, Functional Ecology).

It contains raw and processed data used to analyze how genotypic variation among populations exposed to different densities of the exotic lace bug (Corythucha marmorata) influences litter decomposition in the exotic perennial herb Solidago altissima (tall goldenrod).

The data were obtained from a series of controlled and semi-natural experiments comparing three native (USA: Minnesota, Kansas, Florida) and three introduced (Japan: Hokkaido, Shiga, Saga) populations of S. altissima. Each population was represented by 8–10 distinct genotypes.

...,

Sikadata.Dryad.7.2019Sika deer allelic diversity across 4 study populations based in Delmarva Peninsula, USA and Yakushima Island Japan.

Thirteen pedigreed and a random-bred populations from Japan were genotyped by using Infinium Feline 63k Iselect Dna Array (Illumina Inc.) to compare the USA population.

Data are raw trait data collected for each individual plant.

The World Values Survey (WVS) is an international research program devoted to the scientific and academic study of social, political, economic, religious and cultural values of people in the world. The project’s goal is to assess which impact values stability or change over time has on the social, political and economic development of countries and societies. The project grew out of the European Values Study and was started in 1981 by its Founder and first President (1981-2013) Professor Ronald Inglehart from the University of Michigan (USA) and his team, and since then has been operating in more than 120 world societies. The main research instrument of the project is a representative comparative social survey which is conducted globally every 5 years. Extensive geographical and thematic scope, free availability of survey data and project findings for broad public turned the WVS into one of the most authoritative and widely-used cross-national surveys in the social sciences. At the moment, WVS is the largest non-commercial cross-national empirical time-series investigation of human beliefs and values ever executed. Interview Mode of collection: mixed mode Face-to-face interview: CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) Face-to-face interview: PAPI (Paper and Pencil Interview) Telephone interview: CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview) Self-administered questionnaire: CAWI (Computer-Assisted Web Interview) Self-administered questionnaire: Paper In all countries, fieldwork was conducted on the basis of detailed and uniform instructions prepared by the WVS Scientific Committee and WVSA secretariat. The main data collection mode in 1981-2012 was face to face (interviewer-administered) interview with the printed questionnaire. Postal surveys (respondent-administered) have been used in Canada, New Zealanda, Japan, Australia. CAPI and online data collection modes have been introduced first in WVS-6 in 2012-2014. The main data collection mode in WVS 2017-2021 is face to face (interviewer-administered). Several countries employed mixed-mode approach to data collection: USA (CAWI; CATI); Australia and Japan (CAWI; postal survey); Hong Kong SAR (PAPI; CAWI); Malaysia (CAWI; PAPI). The WVS Master Questionnaire is always provided in English and each national survey team has to ensure that the questionnaire was translated into all the languages spoken by 15% or more of the population in the country. A central team monitors the translation process. The target population is defined as: individuals aged 18 (16/17 is acceptable in the countries with such voting age) or older (with no upper age limit), regardless of their nationality, citizenship or language, that have been residing in the [country] within private households for the past 6 months prior to the date of beginning of fieldwork (or in the date of the first visit to the household, in case of random-route selection). The sampling procedures differ from country to country; probability Sample: Multistage Sample Probability Sample, Simple Random Sample Representative single stage or multi-stage sampling of the adult population of the country 18 (16) years old and older was used for the WVS 1981-2020. In 1981-2012, the required sample size for each coutnry was N=1000 or above. In 2017-2021, the sample size was set as effective sample size: 1200 for countries with population over 2 million, 1000 for countries with population less than 2 million. As an exception, few surveys with smaller sample sizes have been accepted into the WVS 1981-2020 through the WVSA's history. Sample design and other relevant information about sampling are reviewed by the WVS Scientific Advisory Committee and approved prior to contracting of fieldwork agency or starting of data collection. The sampling is documented using the Survey Design Form delivered by the national teams which included the description of the sampling frame and each sampling stage as well as the calculation of the planned gross and net sample size to achieve the required effective sample. Additionally, it included the analytical description of the inclusion probabilities of the sampling design that are used to calculate design weights.

With the proliferation of tobacco products, there might be a need for more complex models than current two-product models. We have developed a three-product model able to represent interactions between three products in the marketplace. We also investigate if using several implementations of two-product models could provide sufficient information to assess 3 coexisting products. Italy is used as case-study with THPs and e-cigarettes as the products under investigation. We use transitions rates estimated for THPs in Japan and e-cigarettes in the USA to project what could happen if the Italian population were to behave as the Japanese for THP or USA for e-cigarettes. Results suggest that three-product models may be hindered by data availability while two product models could miss potential synergies between products. Both, THP and E-Cigarette scenarios, led to reduction in life-years lost although the Japanese THP scenario reductions were 3 times larger than the USA e-cigarette projections.

Supplementary files for article Supplementary information files for Height and body-mass index trajectories of school-aged children and adolescents from 1985 to 2019 in 200 countries and territories: a pooled analysis of 2181 population-based studies with 65 million participants.BackgroundComparable global data on health and nutrition of school-aged children and adolescents are scarce. We aimed to estimate age trajectories and time trends in mean height and mean body-mass index (BMI), which measures weight gain beyond what is expected from height gain, for school-aged children and adolescents.MethodsFor this pooled analysis, we used a database of cardiometabolic risk factors collated by the Non-Communicable Disease Risk Factor Collaboration. We applied a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate trends from 1985 to 2019 in mean height and mean BMI in 1-year age groups for ages 5–19 years. The model allowed for non-linear changes over time in mean height and mean BMI and for non-linear changes with age of children and adolescents, including periods of rapid growth during adolescence.FindingsWe pooled data from 2181 population-based studies, with measurements of height and weight in 65 million participants in 200 countries and territories. In 2019, we estimated a difference of 20 cm or higher in mean height of 19-year-old adolescents between countries with the tallest populations (the Netherlands, Montenegro, Estonia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina for boys; and the Netherlands, Montenegro, Denmark, and Iceland for girls) and those with the shortest populations (Timor-Leste, Laos, Solomon Islands, and Papua New Guinea for boys; and Guatemala, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Timor-Leste for girls). In the same year, the difference between the highest mean BMI (in Pacific island countries, Kuwait, Bahrain, The Bahamas, Chile, the USA, and New Zealand for both boys and girls and in South Africa for girls) and lowest mean BMI (in India, Bangladesh, Timor-Leste, Ethiopia, and Chad for boys and girls; and in Japan and Romania for girls) was approximately 9–10 kg/m2. In some countries, children aged 5 years started with healthier height or BMI than the global median and, in some cases, as healthy as the best performing countries, but they became progressively less healthy compared with their comparators as they grew older by not growing as tall (eg, boys in Austria and Barbados, and girls in Belgium and Puerto Rico) or gaining too much weight for their height (eg, girls and boys in Kuwait, Bahrain, Fiji, Jamaica, and Mexico; and girls in South Africa and New Zealand). In other countries, growing children overtook the height of their comparators (eg, Latvia, Czech Republic, Morocco, and Iran) or curbed their weight gain (eg, Italy, France, and Croatia) in late childhood and adolescence. When changes in both height and BMI were considered, girls in South Korea, Vietnam, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and some central Asian countries (eg, Armenia and Azerbaijan), and boys in central and western Europe (eg, Portugal, Denmark, Poland, and Montenegro) had the healthiest changes in anthropometric status over the past 3·5 decades because, compared with children and adolescents in other countries, they had a much larger gain in height than they did in BMI. The unhealthiest changes—gaining too little height, too much weight for their height compared with children in other countries, or both—occurred in many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, New Zealand, and the USA for boys and girls; in Malaysia and some Pacific island nations for boys; and in Mexico for girls.InterpretationThe height and BMI trajectories over age and time of school-aged children and adolescents are highly variable across countries, which indicates heterogeneous nutritional quality and lifelong health advantages and risks.

The Globalization of Personal Data (GPD) was an international, multi-disciplinary and collaborative research initiative drawing mainly on the social sciences but also including information, computing, technology studies, and law, that explored the implications of processing personal and population data in electronic format from 2004 to 2008. Such data included everything from census statistics to surveillance camera images, from biometric passports to supermarket loyalty cards. The project ma intained a strong concern for ethics, politics and policy development around personal data. The project, funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRCC) under its Initiative on the New Economy program, conducted research on why surveillance occurs, how it operates, and what this means for people's everyday lives (See http://www.sscqueens.org/projects/gpd). The unique aspect of the GPD included a major international survey on citizens' attitudes to issues of surveillance and privacy. The GPD project was conducted in nine countries: Canada, U.S.A., France, Spain, Hungary, Mexico, Brazil, China, and Japan. Three data files were produced: a Seven-Country file (Canada, U.S.A., France, Spain, Hungary, Mexico, and Brazil), a China file, and a Japan file. Country Report are available for download from QSpace (Queen's University Research and Learning Repository).

This dataset captures cross-cultural leadership behavior preferences across five globally diverse countries: USA, Japan, Brazil, India, and Nigeria. It includes responses from 6,945 individuals, covering demographic, educational, cultural, and behavioral perspectives. The data explores how personal and cultural factors influence leadership expectations in various regions. Cultural traits such as individualism, indulgence, and uncertainty avoidance are analyzed alongside leadership responses. Leadership behavior is assessed across six key dimensions like consideration, structure, and integration. This dataset provides valuable insights for designing culturally responsive leadership approaches in global organizations.

Das Bild Europas in Japan. Themen: Bekanntheitsgrad von ASEAN, EG und UN; Charakterisierung derEuropäischen Gemeinschaft als politische, ökonomische Vereinigung oderHandelsunion; Vergleich der Größe der Population der EG mit den USA;Vergleich des Lebensstandards der EG-Bürger mit dem der Japaner;Vergleich des japanischen Handelsvolumens mit der EG und denVereinigten Staaten; Kenntnis der EG-Mitgliedsländer; Kenntnis desProjekts ´Europa 92´; erwartete Auswirkungen dieses Projekts auf dieBeziehungen zwischen Japan und Westeuropa; Begrüßung einer engerenKooperation zwischen der EG und Japan in den Bereichen Kultur,technische Forschung, Energie, politische Kooperation, Umwelt undHandel; präferierte Medien (Fernsehnachrichten, Seminare,Veröffentlichungen usw.) über Europa; wichtigste Themen für einevermehrte Information über Vorgänge in der EG; wichtigsteInformationsquellen über die Europäische Gemeinschaft; Beurteilung derVereinigten Staaten, der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und derASEAN-Mitglieder als faire Handelspartner. Demographie: Alter; Geschlecht; Schulbildung; Berufstätigkeit;Haushaltseinkommen; Ortsgröße. The image of Europe in Japan. Topics: degree of familiarity of ASEAN,EC and UN; characterization of the European Community as political,economic union or business union; comparison of size of population ofthe EC with the USA; comparison of standard of living of the ECcitizens with that of the Japanese; comparison of the Japanese tradevolume with the EC and the United States; knowledge about EC membercountries; knowledge about the project ´Europe 92´; expected effects ofthis project on the relations between Japan and Western Europe;welcoming a closer cooperation between the EC and Japan in the areasculture, technical research, energy, political cooperation, environmentand trade; preferred media (television news, seminars, publicationsetc.) about Europe; most important topics for increased informationabout occurrences in the EC; most important sources of informationabout the European Community; judgement on the United States, theEuropean Community and the ASEAN members as fair trading partners.

The World Values Survey (WVS) is an international research program devoted to the scientific and academic study of social, political, economic, religious and cultural values of people in the world. The project’s goal is to assess which impact values stability or change over time has on the social, political and economic development of countries and societies. The project grew out of the European Values Study and was started in 1981 by its Founder and first President (1981-2013) Professor Ronald Inglehart from the University of Michigan (USA) and his team, and since then has been operating in more than 120 world societies. The main research instrument of the project is a representative comparative social survey which is conducted globally every 5 years. Extensive geographical and thematic scope, free availability of survey data and project findings for broad public turned the WVS into one of the most authoritative and widely-used cross-national surveys in the social sciences. At the moment, WVS is the largest non-commercial cross-national empirical time-series investigation of human beliefs and values ever executed. Interview Mode of collection: mixed mode Face-to-face interview: CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) Face-to-face interview: PAPI (Paper and Pencil Interview) Telephone interview: CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview) Self-administered questionnaire: CAWI (Computer-Assisted Web Interview) Self-administered questionnaire: Paper Web-based Interview In all countries, fieldwork was conducted on the basis of detailed and uniform instructions prepared by the WVS Scientific Committee and WVSA secretariat. The main data collection mode in 1981-2012 was face to face (interviewer-administered) interview with the printed questionnaire. Postal surveys (respondent-administered) have been used in Canada, New Zealanda, Japan, Australia. CAPI and online data collection modes have been introduced first in WVS-6 in 2012-2014. The main data collection mode in WVS 2017-2022 is face to face (interviewer-administered) interview with a printed or electronic questionnaire (CAPI). Several countries employed mixed-mode approach to data collection: USA (CAWI; CATI); Australia and Japan (CAWI; postal survey); Hong Kong SAR (PAPI; CAWI); Malaysia (CAWI; PAPI). The WVS Master Questionnaire is always provided in English and each national survey team has to ensure that the questionnaire was translated into all the languages spoken by 15% or more of the population in the country. A central team monitors the translation process. The target population is defined as: individuals aged 18 (16/17 is acceptable in the countries with such voting age) or older (with no upper age limit), regardless of their nationality, citizenship or language, that have been residing in the [country] within private households for the past 6 months prior to the date of beginning of fieldwork (or in the date of the first visit to the household, in case of random-route selection). The sampling procedures differ from country to country; probability Sample: Multistage Sample Probability Sample, Simple Random Sample Representative single stage or multi-stage sampling of the adult population of the country 18 (16) years old and older was used for the WVS 1981-2022. In 1981-2012, the required sample size for each coutnry was N=1000 or above. In 2017-2022, the sample size was set as effective sample size: 1200 for countries with population over 2 million, 1000 for countries with population less than 2 million. As an exception, few surveys with smaller sample sizes have been accepted into the WVS 1981-2022 through the WVSA's history. Sample design and other relevant information about sampling are reviewed by the WVS Scientific Advisory Committee and approved prior to contracting of fieldwork agency or starting of data collection. The sampling is documented using the Survey Design Form delivered by the national teams which included the description of the sampling frame and each sampling stage as well as the calculation of the planned gross and net sample size to achieve the required effective sample. Additionally, it included the analytical description of the inclusion probabilities of the sampling design that are used to calculate design weights.

This dataset contains estimates of the socio-economic status (SES) for six countries, including Egypt, Turkey, the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and China. The dataset covers the period from 1880 to 2010 and includes SES measures such as average income and educational ranking for each country. The SES scores are reported as percentile rankings ranging from 1-99. The dataset was collected from various sources and compiled into a single dataset for easy analysis and comparison of these six countries' socio-economic development over time. This dataset can be used for research and analysis purposes in various fields, including economics, sociology, and political science.

VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS: UNID: ISO numeric country code (used by the United Nations) WBID: ISO alpha country code (used by the World Bank) SES: Socioeconomic status score (percentile) based on GDP per capita and educational attainment (n=174) country: Short country name year: Survey year SES: Socioeconomic status score (1-99) for each of 174 countries gdppc: GDP per capita: Single time series (imputed) yrseduc: Completed years of education in the adult (15+) population popshare: Total population shares

This social media content dataset is simulate realistic influencer posts across multiple popular platforms, reflecting diverse content types, sponsorship details, audience demographics, and engagement metrics. The dataset contains over 52,000 rows representing individual content posts generated over the past two years. It includes a balanced distribution of sponsored and non-sponsored content, with detailed disclosure information to support transparency studies and analyses. The variety of platforms, languages, content categories, and audience demographics makes this dataset ideal for exploring influencer marketing dynamics, content performance analytics, disclosure practices, and audience segmentation in social media research.

Dataset Features

id: Unique identifier for each content post (starting from 1).

platform: The social media platform where the content was posted. Values: YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Bilibili, RedNote.

content_id: Unique ID for each content piece (e.g., content_0, content_1, …).

creator_id: Unique identifier for the content creator, cycling through 5000 distinct creators.

creator_name: Username of the content creator.

content_url: URL pointing to the content.

content_type: Format of the content. Values: video, image, text, mixed.

content_category: The main theme or niche of the content. Values: beauty, lifestyle, tech.

post_date: Timestamp of the post, randomly distributed over the past two years.

language: Language of the content, with probabilities favoring English. Values: English, Chinese, Spanish, Hindi, Japanese.

content_length: Length of the content in seconds (for video) or word count (for text), varying by content type.

content_description: Textual description or caption of the content.

hashtags: A comma-separated string of hashtags used in the post (0 to 5 tags).

views: Number of views (simulated via a Poisson distribution).

likes: Number of likes received.

shares: Number of shares.

comments_count: Count of comments on the post.

comments_text: Aggregated text of comments (0 to 5 comments concatenated).

follower_count: Number of followers the creator had at the time of posting.

is_sponsored: Boolean indicating whether the post is sponsored.

disclosure_type: Disclosure type regarding sponsorship for sponsored posts. Values: explicit, implicit, none (non-sponsored always 'none').

sponsor_name: Name of the sponsoring company if sponsored, else 'Not sponsors'.

sponsor_category: Sponsorship industry category. Values: cosmetics, electronics, fashion, food, gaming, travel or 'Not sponsors'.

disclosure_location: Where sponsorship disclosure appears in the post. Values: video, caption, hashtags, none (non-sponsored always 'none').

audience_age_distribution: Predominant age group of the audience. Values: 13-18, 19-25, 26-35, 36-50, 50+.

audience_gender_distribution: Predominant gender of the audience. Values: male, female, non-binary, unknown.

audience_location: Primary geographic location of the audience. Values: USA, China, India, Japan, Brazil, Germany, UK, Russia.

Information on EV-G-positive fecal samples from pigs in Japan.

The QS World University Rankings for 2025 is a list of universities from all over the world, organized to show which ones are the best in various areas. It is widely recognized as one of the most reliable ways to compare higher education institutions. This ranking helps students, researchers, and decision-makers understand how well universities perform in terms of academics, teaching, research, and global connections. Let’s break it down into simple parts so that you can understand it easily.

What’s in the Ranking? The ranking includes several key pieces of information about each university:

University Name: This is simply the name of the school. For example, Harvard University or Oxford University. Ranking Position: This tells you the university’s position on the list, like 1st, 50th, or 200th. A lower number means the university is ranked higher. Country/Region: This shows where the university is located, like the USA, the UK, or Japan. Academic Reputation Score: This score is based on surveys of professors and researchers. They give their opinions on which universities are best for studying and learning. Employer Reputation Score: Employers are asked which universities produce the most skilled graduates. This score shows how good a university is at preparing students for jobs. Faculty-Student Ratio: This measures how many students there are per teacher. A lower number means smaller classes and more personal attention for students. Citations per Faculty: This is about research. It shows how often the university’s studies are mentioned in other research papers. The more citations, the better. International Faculty & Students: This looks at how many teachers and students come from different countries, showing how global and diverse the university is. Why Is This Ranking Useful? There are many ways this ranking can help people:

For Students: It helps students decide where they might want to study. For example, if someone wants a university with a good reputation for teaching and research, they can use this ranking to find the best options. For Universities: Schools can use the rankings to see how they compare to others. If one university is ranked lower than another, it can look at the scores to find ways to improve. For Researchers: Researchers can study the ranking to learn about trends in global education. For example, they might explore why certain regions, like Asia or Europe, have universities that are improving quickly. For Policymakers: Governments and organizations can use the rankings to decide where to invest in education. They can also study which areas of education are most important for the future. What Can We Learn from It? The QS World University Rankings help us learn which universities are leading in academics and research. It also shows us how important global diversity is in education. By understanding these rankings, people can make smarter decisions about studying, teaching, or improving education systems. It’s like a guidebook for the world of universities, helping everyone find the best options and learn from the best practices.