Resident Population in the Midwest Census Region was 69596.58400 Thous. of Persons in January of 2024, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Resident Population in the Midwest Census Region reached a record high of 69596.58400 in January of 2024 and a record low of 26359.00000 in January of 1900. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Resident Population in the Midwest Census Region - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on July of 2025.

Graph and download economic data for Unemployed Persons in Midwest Census Region (LAURD920000000000004) from Jan 1976 to May 2025 about Midwest Census Region, household survey, unemployment, persons, and USA.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Midwest City population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of Midwest City across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2023, the population of Midwest City was 58,086, a 0.15% increase year-by-year from 2022. Previously, in 2022, Midwest City population was 57,997, a decline of 0.29% compared to a population of 58,164 in 2021. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2023, population of Midwest City increased by 4,319. In this period, the peak population was 58,464 in the year 2020. The numbers suggest that the population has already reached its peak and is showing a trend of decline. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2023

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2023)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the Midwest City is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in Midwest City population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Midwest City Population by Year. You can refer the same here

Graph and download economic data for Employed Persons in Midwest Census Region (LASRD920000000000005) from Jan 1976 to May 2025 about Midwest Census Region, household survey, employment, persons, and USA.

This statistic shows the change in the regional distribution of the U.S. population each decade from 1790 to 2021. In 2021, 17.2 percent of the population in the United States lived in the Northeast.

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts statistics for Midwest City city, Oklahoma. QuickFacts data are derived from: Population Estimates, American Community Survey, Census of Population and Housing, Current Population Survey, Small Area Health Insurance Estimates, Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, State and County Housing Unit Estimates, County Business Patterns, Nonemployer Statistics, Economic Census, Survey of Business Owners, Building Permits.

Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, the decennial census is the official source of population totals for April 1st of each decennial year. In between censuses, the Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities, and towns and estimates of housing units and the group quarters population for states and counties..Information about the American Community Survey (ACS) can be found on the ACS website. Supporting documentation including code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing, and a full list of ACS tables and table shells (without estimates) can be found on the Technical Documentation section of the ACS website.Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section..Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2023 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates.ACS data generally reflect the geographic boundaries of legal and statistical areas as of January 1 of the estimate year. For more information, see Geography Boundaries by Year..Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see ACS Technical Documentation). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables..Users must consider potential differences in geographic boundaries, questionnaire content or coding, or other methodological issues when comparing ACS data from different years. Statistically significant differences shown in ACS Comparison Profiles, or in data users' own analysis, may be the result of these differences and thus might not necessarily reflect changes to the social, economic, housing, or demographic characteristics being compared. For more information, see Comparing ACS Data..Estimates of urban and rural populations, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on 2020 Census data. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization..Explanation of Symbols:- The estimate could not be computed because there were an insufficient number of sample observations. For a ratio of medians estimate, one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or highest interval of an open-ended distribution. For a 5-year median estimate, the margin of error associated with a median was larger than the median itself.N The estimate or margin of error cannot be displayed because there were an insufficient number of sample cases in the selected geographic area. (X) The estimate or margin of error is not applicable or not available.median- The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution (for example "2,500-")median+ The median falls in the highest interval of an open-ended distribution (for example "250,000+").** The margin of error could not be computed because there were an insufficient number of sample observations.*** The margin of error could not be computed because the median falls in the lowest interval or highest interval of an open-ended distribution.***** A margin of error is not appropriate because the corresponding estimate is controlled to an independent population or housing estimate. Effectively, the corresponding estimate has no sampling error and the margin of error may be treated as zero.

This dataset includes microsatellite genotypes for 8,454 brook trout from 188 wild Midwestern populations and 26 hatchery strains of both Midwest and eastern (Atlantic seaboard) origin. Each individual was genotyped at either 5 or 7 loci.

ObjectiveThere is currently inconclusive evidence regarding the relationship between recidivism and mental illness. This retrospective study aimed to use rigorous machine learning methods to understand the unique predictive utility of mental illness for recidivism in a general population (i.e.; not only those with mental illness) prison sample in the United States.MethodParticipants were adult men (n = 322) and women (n = 72) who were recruited from three prisons in the Midwest region of the United States. Three model comparisons using Bayesian correlated t-tests were conducted to understand the incremental predictive utility of mental illness, substance use, and crime and demographic variables for recidivism prediction. Three classification statistical algorithms were considered while evaluating model configurations for the t-tests: elastic net logistic regression (GLMnet), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and random forests (RF).ResultsRates of substance use disorders were particularly high in our sample (86.29%). Mental illness variables and substance use variables did not add predictive utility for recidivism prediction over and above crime and demographic variables. Exploratory analyses comparing the crime and demographic, substance use, and mental illness feature sets to null models found that only the crime and demographics model had an increased likelihood of improving recidivism prediction accuracy.ConclusionsDespite not finding a direct relationship between mental illness and recidivism, treatment of mental illness in incarcerated populations is still essential due to the high rates of mental illnesses, the legal imperative, the possibility of decreasing institutional disciplinary burden, the opportunity to increase the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs in prison, and the potential to improve meaningful outcomes beyond recidivism following release.

Milwaukee is the largest city in the state of Wisconsin and the fifth-largest city in the Midwestern United States. The county seat of Milwaukee County, it is on Lake Michigan's western shore. Ranked by estimated 2014 population, Milwaukee was the 31st largest city in the United States.[7] The city's estimated population in 2015 was 600,155.[8] Milwaukee is the main cultural and economic center of the Milwaukee metropolitan area. It is also part of the larger Milwaukee-Racine-Waukesha combined statistical area, which had an estimated population of 2,026,243 in the 2010 census. Milwaukee is also the second most densely populated metropolitan area in the Midwest, surpassed only by Chicago. View our Open Data Policy by selecting the link below, https://city.milwaukee.gov/ImageLibrary/Groups/cityOpenData/MilwaukeeOpenDataPolicy.pdf

A dataset listing Wisconsin cities by population for 2024.

Mental health disorders and symptoms by recidivism status.

This dataset contains remotely sensed estimates of nitrogen dioxide (NO2, via TROPOMI accessed via Google Earth Engine) for HOLC neighborhoods in 11 US Midwestern cities, and corresponding coarse geographic and demographic data of those cities. NO2 data is reported daily for the entire calendar year of 2019, geographic and demographic variables are fixed for each city for the entire year. Each HOLC-graded neighborhood included in this dataset was filtered to be greater than 2 km2. The number of pixels used to calculate the area-weighted mean of NO2 is also reported, as is the area of the neighborhood. The dataset has also been filtered for observations that did not pass quality filters for L3 TROPOMI data. The cities included in the study are: Chicago IL, Milwaukee WI, Saint Paul MN, Minneapolis MN, Indianapolis IN, Cleveland OH, Wichita KS, Greater Kansas City KS and MO, Columbus OH, Detroit MI, and Omaha NE. HOLC neighborhood shapefiles were obtained from the Mapping Inequality project website, hosted by the University of Richmond, and resulting polygons used in analysis were created by dissolving shared boundaries in Google Earth Engine. City populations and population density were obtained from the US 2010 Census data. All data was collected and organized to assess if current day NO2 levels varied with HOLC grades in these major cities.

Robert K. Nelson, LaDale Winling, Richard Marciano, Nathan Connolly, et al., “Mapping Inequality,” American Panorama, ed. https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/redlining/#loc=5/39.1/-94.58&text=downloads

Dataset for all analyses presented in Hrycyna et al. Columns described below:

HOLC_grade: A, B, C, D (neighborhood grade categories obtained from Mapping Inequality project, indicate historic HOLC designations of neighborhoods).

HOLCAreaKm2: continuous area value in km2 of the HOLC neighborhood polygon, which may be more than one HOLC designated polygon merged from the shapefiles downloaded from Mapping Inequality.

pixelcount: integer values of the number of TROPOMI NO2 pixels used to produce the area-weighted mean NO2 value.

NO2_mol_m2: area-weighted mean value of TROPOMI NO2 for that HOLC neighborhood polygon in mol m-2

system.index: designated date and time boundary of the observation collected via TROPOMI

date: date of observation

month: month of observation

City: city in the US Midwest

State: state for the city of focus

Population: urban population obtained from 2010 census

PopDensity: urban population density obtained from 2010 census, based on modern city boundaries (in people per square miles)

CityArea_mi2: Area of the city of interest, in square miles.

ln_NO2: natural log transformed NO2 values in mol m-2

NO2_DU: NO2 value converted from mol m-2 to DU (Dobsons Units, converted by multiplying 2241.15)

NO2_lnDU: natural log transformed NO2 values in DU

Comment: We have submitted the manuscript to Elementa, where it is currently undergoing revisions. We will update references when the final DOI of the manuscript is available.

A dataset listing Iowa cities by population for 2024.

Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

The population name, site, year, densities, macroclimates, and microclimates are included. (XLSX)

The population name, site, year, densities, macroclimates, and microclimates are included. (XLSX)

The adjusted-R2 value of each model is added to the last row of the table.

Downscaled climate projections need to be linked to downscaled projections of population and economic growth to fully develop implications for land, natural resources, and ecosystems for future scenarios. We develop an empirical spatiotemporal approach for jointly projecting population and income at the county scale in the United States that is consistent with neoclassical economic growth theory and overlapping labor markets and that accounts for labor migration and spatial spillovers. Downscaled projections generated for the five Shared Socioeconomic Pathways used to support global scenario analysis generally show growth focused around relatively few centers especially in the southeast and western regions, with some areas in the Midwest and northeast experiencing population declines. Results are consistent with economic growth theory and with historical trends in population change and convergence of per capita personal income across US counties.

BackgroundFor two decades preceding the COVID-19 pandemic, testosterone therapy (TT) became more prevalent in the US. Given the forced shift in practice patterns and healthcare accessibility during the pandemic, it was unclear how TT utilization would change.ObjectiveTo assess the change in testosterone prescriptions nationally.DesignCross-sectional study.Data sourcesState prescription drug monitoring program data between 2018 and 2022.ParticipantsAll individuals filling testosterone prescriptions in participating states.MeasurementsUnique people filling testosterone prescriptions annually, demographic information on gender and age as available.ResultsIn 2022 there was a 27% relative increase of subjects treated with TT (+439,659 cases compared with 2018). The increase was more evident in the pandemic period with a rise in prevalence most notable for people 45–54 (114,114 people, 35% increase) and 35–44 (97,263 people, 58% increase). All regions except the Midwest increased the total population treated, led by the South (52%) followed by the West (28%) and Northeast (23%). Available data indicated men accounted for most patients treated in all age groups except under 24 years.LimitationsStudy population limited to those in participating states with no diagnostic information and limited demographics available.ConclusionBetween 2018 and 2022, and primarily after the start of the pandemic in 2020, nationally there was a substantial increase in the number of people using TT. The largest increases occurred in a younger demographic, primarily men, than have previously been reported or studied. These results echo other findings showing increased use of controlled substances during the pandemic period and warrant further study regarding the factors behind this rise.