Estimate population figures at state administrative level and different age groups

Estimate population figures at state administrative level and different age groups

Additional file 1. Rates of reported cases of measles per 100,000 populations from January 2016 to December 2018 for all LGA in Osun State. This file shows the data from which Fig. 1 was derived. The first column for each year (2016–2018) is the LGA the second is the estimated population of each LGA from the Nigeria 2006 national census the third is the number of reported case for that year in each LGA and lastly the computed incidence rate.

Abstract

Poverty dynamics enables a better appreciation of the extent of poverty over time by distinguishing between households exiting and entering into poverty, those never poor and the persistently poor. However, it has not received much attention in the poverty literature in Nigeria, largely due to the lack of nationally representative panel data that track the poverty status of households over time.

This survey intends to provide indicators for tracking the welfare status of rural households overtime as well as identify the factors influencing this status for potent policy prescriptions.

Geographic coverage

Southwest Zone Osun State Oyo State

Analysis unit

Households

Universe

Rural household heads

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The frame for the study was the demarcated Enumeration Area (EA) maps produced by National Population Commission for the 2006 Housing and Population Census. These EAs used are part of the ones usually used by National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) for her regular household-based surveys.

A multi-stage sampling technique was adopted for this study for the selection of respondents. The first stage was a random selection of two states of Oyo and Osun from the six states that make-up the Southwest geo-political zone of the country. The second stage involved the random selection of three local government areas (LGAs) from each of the selected state. The third stage was the random selection of ten rural enumeration areas (EAs) from each of the selected LGA. The final stage of the sampling was the systematic selection of ten households from the households listed in each selected EA. Hence, in each state 300 households were interviewed giving a total of 600 households in the two selected states canvassed for the study in the first period but only 582 households could be re-interviewed in the second round. Data from these 582 households were used for analysis in this study.

Sampling deviation

No deviations from sample design

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The questionnaire is divided into 6 sections:

Section A: Socio- economic/demographic characteristics Section B: Health
Section C: Housing, Utilities And Amenities Section D: Social Capital Section E: Household Consumption Section F: Shocks and Coping Strategies

Cleaning operations

Data editing took place primarily during processing and includes: a) Office editing and coding b) During data entry

Response rate

The response rate is 97%

Sampling error estimates

No sampling error

Data appraisal

No other form of data appraisal