15 datasets found
  1. M

    Perth, Australia Metro Area Population (1950-2025)

    • macrotrends.net
    csv
    Updated May 31, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    MACROTRENDS (2025). Perth, Australia Metro Area Population (1950-2025) [Dataset]. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/cities/206172/perth/population
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    MACROTRENDS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 1950 - Jun 20, 2025
    Area covered
    Australia
    Description

    Chart and table of population level and growth rate for the Perth, Australia metro area from 1950 to 2025.

  2. A

    Australia Population: Resident: Estimated: Annual: Western Australia:...

    • ceicdata.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com, Australia Population: Resident: Estimated: Annual: Western Australia: Greater Perth [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/australia/estimated-resident-population/population-resident-estimated-annual-western-australia-greater-perth
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jun 1, 2006 - Jun 1, 2017
    Area covered
    Australia
    Variables measured
    Population
    Description

    Population: Resident: Estimated: Annual: Western Australia: Greater Perth data was reported at 2,039,041.000 Person in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 2,019,263.000 Person for 2016. Population: Resident: Estimated: Annual: Western Australia: Greater Perth data is updated yearly, averaging 1,863,214.500 Person from Jun 2006 (Median) to 2017, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,039,041.000 Person in 2017 and a record low of 1,576,912.000 Person in 2006. Population: Resident: Estimated: Annual: Western Australia: Greater Perth data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Australian Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.G002: Estimated Resident Population.

  3. Population distribution Western Australia 2023, by age group

    • statista.com
    Updated Apr 3, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Population distribution Western Australia 2023, by age group [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/608470/australia-age-distribution-western-australia/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 3, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Australia
    Description

    As of June 2023, in the state of Western Australia in Australia, about 7.7 percent of the population was between 35 and 39 years old. In comparison, just 1.9 percent of the population was over the age of 85.

  4. 澳大利亚 Population: Resident: Estimated: Annual: Western Australia: Greater...

    • ceicdata.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com, 澳大利亚 Population: Resident: Estimated: Annual: Western Australia: Greater Perth [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/zh-hans/australia/estimated-resident-population/population-resident-estimated-annual-western-australia-greater-perth
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jun 1, 2006 - Jun 1, 2017
    Area covered
    Greater Perth, 珀斯, 西澳大利亚州, 澳大利亚, 澳大利亚
    Variables measured
    Population
    Description

    澳大利亚 Population: Resident: Estimated: Annual: Western Australia: Greater Perth在2017达2,039,041.000 人口,相较于2016的2,019,263.000 人口有所增长。澳大利亚 Population: Resident: Estimated: Annual: Western Australia: Greater Perth数据按每年更新,2006至2017期间平均值为1,863,214.500 人口,共12份观测结果。该数据的历史最高值出现于2017,达2,039,041.000 人口,而历史最低值则出现于2006,为1,576,912.000 人口。CEIC提供的澳大利亚 Population: Resident: Estimated: Annual: Western Australia: Greater Perth数据处于定期更新的状态,数据来源于Australian Bureau of Statistics,数据归类于Global Database的澳大利亚 – Table AU.G002: Estimated Resident Population。

  5. r

    Distribution and amenity of public open space across the Perth Metropolitan...

    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Aug 1, 2013
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Professor Fiona Bull (2013). Distribution and amenity of public open space across the Perth Metropolitan region: a local government perspective: POS Tool case study [Dataset]. https://researchdata.edu.au/distribution-amenity-public-case-study/125057
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 1, 2013
    Dataset provided by
    The University of Western Australia
    Authors
    Professor Fiona Bull
    Time period covered
    Jun 12, 2013 - Aug 2, 2013
    Area covered
    Perth Metropolitan Area
    Description

    This collection comprises a report developed from the analysis of data output from the POSTool and written by Paula Hooper, Bryan Boruff and Fiona Bull of the Centre for the Built Environment and Health, University of Western Australia. The report examined the spatial distribution of Public Open Space (POS) across the Perth Metropolitan Region (PMR) focusing specifically on parks, park type, park amenity, and park catchment by Local Government Area (LGA). Summary statistics were derived for each LGA in the PMR using the POS Tool and park and park amenity provision compared across the region.

    The report outlines the spatial disparities in the provision of parks and park amenity in Perth highlighting where certain LGA’s have underprovided for the citizens they represent. Furthermore, through the examination of park catchments and the population serviced by each park, the report identifies the percent of each LGA’s population which does not have easy access to parks in their neighborhood. The results of this report identify the varying range of park and park amenity provision across the PMR whilst providing an example of the robust analysis which can be conducted using results generated by the POS Tool.

  6. d

    Population viabilty analysis of the Perth metropolitan population of Little...

    • seamap.env.duke.edu
    xml
    Updated Feb 29, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dr Cannell; Dr Cannell (2024). Population viabilty analysis of the Perth metropolitan population of Little Penguins [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.15468/9333q6
    Explore at:
    xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 29, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    OBIS-SEAMAP
    Authors
    Dr Cannell; Dr Cannell
    License

    https://seamap.env.duke.edu/content/license_permissionhttps://seamap.env.duke.edu/content/license_permission

    Time period covered
    May 1, 2025
    Area covered
    Description

    Original provider: Dr Belinda Cannell, Murdoch University

    Dataset credits: Data provider Murdoch University - Biological Sciences and Biotechnology Originating data center Satellite Tracking and Analysis Tool (STAT) Project partner Murdoch University
    University of NSW Project sponsor or sponsor description This project has been funded under the Australian Research Council Linkage Project Scheme. Funds have also been contributed by Department of Environment and Conservation,
    Fremantle Ports, Department of Defence, Tiwest and the Winifred Violet Scott Trust fund.

    Abstract: Little Penguins from Penguin and Garden islands in Perth, Western Australia, are tracked to determine the areas in which they travel and feed throughout the breeding season. Once the areas they regularly use are determined, the threats the penguins are exposed to, and their likelihood of occurrence, can be elucidated. This forms part of a broader project to determine the population viability analysis of the Little Penguins in the Perth metropolitan region.

  7. f

    Song variation of the South Eastern Indian Ocean pygmy blue whale population...

    • plos.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Capri D. Jolliffe; Robert D. McCauley; Alexander N. Gavrilov; K. Curt S. Jenner; Micheline-Nicole M. Jenner; Alec J. Duncan (2023). Song variation of the South Eastern Indian Ocean pygmy blue whale population in the Perth Canyon, Western Australia [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208619
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Capri D. Jolliffe; Robert D. McCauley; Alexander N. Gavrilov; K. Curt S. Jenner; Micheline-Nicole M. Jenner; Alec J. Duncan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Perth Canyon, Indian Ocean, Western Australia, Australia
    Description

    Sea noise collected over 2003 to 2017 from the Perth Canyon, Western Australia was analysed for variation in the South Eastern Indian Ocean pygmy blue whale song structure. The primary song-types were: P3, a three unit phrase (I, II and III) repeated with an inter-song interval (ISI) of 170–194 s; P2, a phrase consisting of only units II & III repeated every 84–96 s; and P1 with a phrase consisting of only unit II repeated every 45–49 s. The different ISI values were approximate multiples of each other within a season. When comparing data from each season, across seasons, the ISI value for each song increased significantly through time (all fits had p < 0.001), at 0.30 s/Year (95%CI 0.217–0.383), 0.8 s/Year (95%CI 0.655–1.025) and 1.73 s/Year (95%CI 1.264–2.196) for the

  8. m

    Data relating microplastics concentrations in stormwater drains to catchment...

    • data.mendeley.com
    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Oct 10, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cassandra Bond (2022). Data relating microplastics concentrations in stormwater drains to catchment land use and demographics, Perth, Western Australia [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/vtdwvg34sd.1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 10, 2022
    Authors
    Cassandra Bond
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Perth, Western Australia
    Description

    The data were collected to test hypotheses that microplastic concentrations in stormwater drains would be able to be predicted from: (1) the proportions of different land uses in stormwater catchments; (2) catchment population and land area; (3) rainfall preceding sample collection. The data show that microplastic fibres were the most common morphology across all drains, followed by fragments. Most microplastics detected were in the 100-530 µm size range, with lower proportions ≤ 25 µm or > 530 µm. The most common colour was black, followed by red, blue, and green with other colours < 5% of total particle counts. There was no statistically significant variation in microplastic concentrations between or within stormwater catchments. Linear mixed-effects models showed significant positive effects of catchment area, catchment population, and the proportion of industrial land, natural land and public open space on microplastic concentrations. The proportion of residential land had a significant negative effect on microplastic concentrations. The proportion of agricultural land in each catchment, and preceding rainfall, had no effect on microplastic concentrations. The majority of data are presented as a single comma-separated value file with 144 rows representing 3 replicates of 4 size fractions from 12 sampling sites. Samples have unique names and are categorised by Size (4 categories), Drain (6 categories) and Site (12 categories, 2 per Drain). Quantitative data relating to microplastics measurement include: sample volume; raw counts of total microplastics and microplastics separated into fragment, fibre, film, and microbead categories; concentrations of total microplastics and microplastics separated into fragment, fibre, film, and microbead categories; blank corrections (fibres only); corrected raw counts and concentrations of fibres; corrected raw counts and concentrations of total microplastics. Catchment demographic and land use data are: catchment area and population; proportions of land use in residential, industrial, services, agricultural, natural, and public open space categories. Rainfall for the 7 days prior to sample collection is also recorded. A separate comma-separated value file summarises the microplastic colour data, and an image shows aerial photograph maps of each site.

  9. f

    Effective population size (Ne) of seven populations of Notechis scutatus...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 9, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Damian C. Lettoof; Vicki A. Thomson; Jari Cornelis; Philip W. Bateman; Fabien Aubret; Marthe M. Gagnon; Brenton von Takach (2023). Effective population size (Ne) of seven populations of Notechis scutatus occidentalis around Perth, Western Australia. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259124.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Damian C. Lettoof; Vicki A. Thomson; Jari Cornelis; Philip W. Bateman; Fabien Aubret; Marthe M. Gagnon; Brenton von Takach
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Perth, Western Australia, Australia
    Description

    Effective population size (Ne) of seven populations of Notechis scutatus occidentalis around Perth, Western Australia.

  10. d

    Conservation Biology of Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Perth...

    • data.gov.au
    html
    Updated Dec 15, 2014
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2014). Conservation Biology of Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Perth Metropolitan Waters - Summary [Dataset]. https://data.gov.au/dataset/ds-aodn-bb61efb0-5f37-11dc-a47f-00188b4c0af8?q=
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2014
    Area covered
    Perth
    Description

    The aim of this study was to assess the effects of human-induced habitat change and illegal feeding on the residential sub-population of ~75 bottlenose dolphins in Cockburn Sound, Western Australia …Show full descriptionThe aim of this study was to assess the effects of human-induced habitat change and illegal feeding on the residential sub-population of ~75 bottlenose dolphins in Cockburn Sound, Western Australia by using a variety of sampling approaches from 2000-2003.

  11. r

    2022 Aerial survey data of southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) off...

    • researchdata.edu.au
    • metadata.imas.utas.edu.au
    Updated Feb 3, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Double, Michael; Smith, Joshua; Smith, Joshua; Smith, Joshua; Double, Michael; Double, Michael (2025). 2022 Aerial survey data of southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) off southern Australia (NESP MaC 2.7) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.26179/NBBZ-NV97
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 3, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Australian Antarctic Data Centre
    University of Tasmania, Australia
    Authors
    Double, Michael; Smith, Joshua; Smith, Joshua; Smith, Joshua; Double, Michael; Double, Michael
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Aug 12, 2022 - Aug 19, 2022
    Area covered
    Description

    Aerial surveys of southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) were undertaken off the southern Australian coast to monitor the recovery of this endangered species following extreme 19th and 20th Century commercial whaling. The aerial survey was undertaken in the coastal waters from Perth (Western Australia) to Ceduna (South Australia) between the 12th and 19th August 2022, to maintain the annual series of surveys and inform the long-term population trend. The survey resulted in a total 526 whales sighted, consisting of 247 cow-calf pairs, 31 unaccompanied adults and 1 yearling. The ‘western’ population of southern right whales in Australian waters is increasing in size (~5.3% per year based on female/calf pairs and a population estimate of 2675 whales) based on the long-term population trend data from the annual aerial surveys. This represents the majority of the Australian population given the very low numbers in the ‘eastern’ population. The 2022 surveys recorded the lowest number of unaccompanied animals (i.e. males and females without a calf) ever throughout the time-series of the annual aerial surveys since 1993 when survey coverage between Cape Leeuwin and Ceduna first began. Across this time series, there is a particularly notable decline in sightings of unaccompanied animals over the past five years. It is currently unclear what factors account for the decline in these sightings or may influence the variation in numbers of unaccompanied animals on the southern Australian coast. Lower than expected counts in the long-term data may provide evidence of a slowing population growth rate, which can only be assessed by continued annual population surveys to assess population trend data.

  12. Data from: Applying the multistate capture-recapture robust design to...

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +1more
    txt, zip
    Updated May 30, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Delphine Chabanne; Kenneth H. Pollock; Hugh Finn; Lars Bejder; Delphine B. H. Chabanne; Delphine Chabanne; Kenneth H. Pollock; Hugh Finn; Lars Bejder; Delphine B. H. Chabanne (2022). Data from: Applying the multistate capture-recapture robust design to characterize metapopulation structure [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.24s3c
    Explore at:
    txt, zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Delphine Chabanne; Kenneth H. Pollock; Hugh Finn; Lars Bejder; Delphine B. H. Chabanne; Delphine Chabanne; Kenneth H. Pollock; Hugh Finn; Lars Bejder; Delphine B. H. Chabanne
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description
    1. Population structure must be considered when developing mark-recapture (MR) study designs as the sampling of individuals from multiple populations (or subpopulations) may increase heterogeneity in individual capture probability. Conversely, the use of an appropriate MR study design which accommodates heterogeneity associated with capture-occasion varying covariates due to animals moving between 'states' (i.e. geographic sites) can provide insight into how animals are distributed in a particular environment and the status and connectivity of subpopulations.
    2. The Multistate Closed Robust Design was chosen to investigate: 1) the demographic parameters of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) subpopulations in coastal and estuarine waters of Perth, Western Australia; and 2) how they are related to each other in a metapopulation. Using four years of year-round photo-identification surveys across three geographic sites, we accounted for heterogeneity of capture probability based on how individuals distributed themselves across geographic sites and characterized the status of subpopulations based on their abundance, survival and interconnection.
    3. MSCRD models highlighted high heterogeneity in capture probabilities and demographic parameters between sites. High capture probabilities, high survival and constant abundances described a subpopulation with high fidelity in an estuary. In contrast, low captures, permanent and temporary emigration and fluctuating abundances suggested transient use and low fidelity in an open coastline site.
    4. Estimates of transition probabilities also varied between sites, with estuarine dolphins visiting sheltered coastal embayments more regularly than coastal dolphins visited the estuary, highlighting some dynamics within the metapopulation.
    5. Synthesis and applications. To date, bottlenose dolphin studies using mark-recapture approach have focussed on investigating single subpopulations. Here, in a heterogeneous coastal-estuarine environment, we demonstrated that spatially structured bottlenose dolphin subpopulations contained distinct suites of individuals and differed in size, demographics and connectivity. Such insights into the dynamics of a metapopulation can assist in local-scale species conservation. The MSCRD approach is applicable to species/populations consisting of recognizable individuals and is particularly useful for characterizing wildlife subpopulations that vary in their vulnerability to human activities, climate change or invasive species.
  13. f

    Table_3_Inconsistency Between Socio-Spatial and Genetic Structure in a...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jan 14, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Delphine B. H. Chabanne; Simon J. Allen; William Bruce Sherwin; Hugh Finn; Michael Krützen (2021). Table_3_Inconsistency Between Socio-Spatial and Genetic Structure in a Coastal Dolphin Population.DOCX [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.617540.s004
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 14, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Delphine B. H. Chabanne; Simon J. Allen; William Bruce Sherwin; Hugh Finn; Michael Krützen
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Identifying population structure and boundaries among communities of wildlife exposed to anthropogenic threats is key to successful conservation management. Previous studies on the demography, social and spatial structure of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) suggested four nearly discrete behavioral communities in Perth metropolitan waters, Western Australia. We investigated the genetic structure of these four communities using highly polymorphic microsatellite markers and part of the hypervariable segment of the mitochondrial control region. Overall, there was no evidence of spatial genetic structure. We found significant, yet very small genetic differentiation between some communities, most likely due to the presence of highly related individuals within these communities. Our findings of high levels of contemporary migration and highly related individuals among communities point toward a panmictic genetic population with continuous gene flow among each of the communities. In species with slow life histories and fission-fusion dynamics, such as Tursiops spp., genetic and socio-spatial structures may reflect different timescales. Thus, despite genetic similarity, each social community should be considered as a distinct ecological unit to be conserved because they are exposed to different anthropogenic threats and occur in different ecological habitats, social structure being as important as genetic information for immediate conservation management. The estuarine community, in particular, is highly vulnerable and appropriate conservation measures are needed in order to maintain its connectivity with the adjacent, semi-enclosed coastal communities.

  14. f

    Table_1_Inconsistency Between Socio-Spatial and Genetic Structure in a...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Delphine B. H. Chabanne; Simon J. Allen; William Bruce Sherwin; Hugh Finn; Michael Krützen (2023). Table_1_Inconsistency Between Socio-Spatial and Genetic Structure in a Coastal Dolphin Population.DOCX [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.617540.s002
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Delphine B. H. Chabanne; Simon J. Allen; William Bruce Sherwin; Hugh Finn; Michael Krützen
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Identifying population structure and boundaries among communities of wildlife exposed to anthropogenic threats is key to successful conservation management. Previous studies on the demography, social and spatial structure of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) suggested four nearly discrete behavioral communities in Perth metropolitan waters, Western Australia. We investigated the genetic structure of these four communities using highly polymorphic microsatellite markers and part of the hypervariable segment of the mitochondrial control region. Overall, there was no evidence of spatial genetic structure. We found significant, yet very small genetic differentiation between some communities, most likely due to the presence of highly related individuals within these communities. Our findings of high levels of contemporary migration and highly related individuals among communities point toward a panmictic genetic population with continuous gene flow among each of the communities. In species with slow life histories and fission-fusion dynamics, such as Tursiops spp., genetic and socio-spatial structures may reflect different timescales. Thus, despite genetic similarity, each social community should be considered as a distinct ecological unit to be conserved because they are exposed to different anthropogenic threats and occur in different ecological habitats, social structure being as important as genetic information for immediate conservation management. The estuarine community, in particular, is highly vulnerable and appropriate conservation measures are needed in order to maintain its connectivity with the adjacent, semi-enclosed coastal communities.

  15. f

    Table_3_Inconsistency Between Socio-Spatial and Genetic Structure in a...

    • figshare.com
    Updated Jun 5, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The citation is currently not available for this dataset.
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 5, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Delphine B. H. Chabanne; Simon J. Allen; William Bruce Sherwin; Hugh Finn; Michael Krützen
    Description

    Identifying population structure and boundaries among communities of wildlife exposed to anthropogenic threats is key to successful conservation management. Previous studies on the demography, social and spatial structure of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) suggested four nearly discrete behavioral communities in Perth metropolitan waters, Western Australia. We investigated the genetic structure of these four communities using highly polymorphic microsatellite markers and part of the hypervariable segment of the mitochondrial control region. Overall, there was no evidence of spatial genetic structure. We found significant, yet very small genetic differentiation between some communities, most likely due to the presence of highly related individuals within these communities. Our findings of high levels of contemporary migration and highly related individuals among communities point toward a panmictic genetic population with continuous gene flow among each of the communities. In species with slow life histories and fission-fusion dynamics, such as Tursiops spp., genetic and socio-spatial structures may reflect different timescales. Thus, despite genetic similarity, each social community should be considered as a distinct ecological unit to be conserved because they are exposed to different anthropogenic threats and occur in different ecological habitats, social structure being as important as genetic information for immediate conservation management. The estuarine community, in particular, is highly vulnerable and appropriate conservation measures are needed in order to maintain its connectivity with the adjacent, semi-enclosed coastal communities.

  16. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
MACROTRENDS (2025). Perth, Australia Metro Area Population (1950-2025) [Dataset]. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/cities/206172/perth/population

Perth, Australia Metro Area Population (1950-2025)

Perth, Australia Metro Area Population (1950-2025)

Explore at:
csvAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
May 31, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
MACROTRENDS
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Time period covered
Dec 1, 1950 - Jun 20, 2025
Area covered
Australia
Description

Chart and table of population level and growth rate for the Perth, Australia metro area from 1950 to 2025.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu