5 datasets found
  1. E

    Polygenic risk scores and GWAS summary statistics for an analysis of the...

    • find.data.gov.scot
    • dtechtive.com
    txt
    Updated Feb 26, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    University of Edinburgh. Centre for Global Health Research. Usher Institute (2021). Polygenic risk scores and GWAS summary statistics for an analysis of the contribution of common risk variants to multiple sclerosis in Orkney and Shetland [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7488/ds/2992
    Explore at:
    txt(0.0036 MB), txt(0.0166 MB)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 26, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    University of Edinburgh. Centre for Global Health Research. Usher Institute
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Orkney, Orkney and Shetland, UNITED KINGDOM
    Description

    Orkney and Shetland, the population isolates which make up the Northern Isles of Scotland, are of particular interest to multiple sclerosis (MS) research. While MS prevalence is high in Scotland, Orkney has the highest global prevalence, higher than more northerly Shetland. Many hypotheses for the excess of MS cases in Orkney have been investigated, including vitamin D deficiency and homozygosity: neither was found to cause the high prevalence of MS. It is possible that this excess prevalence may be explained through unique genetics. We used polygenic risk scores (PRS) to look at the contribution of common risk variants to MS. Analyses were conducted using ORCADES (97/2118 cases/controls), VIKING (15/2000 cases/controls) and Generation Scotland (30/8708 cases/controls) datasets. However, no evidence of a difference in MS associated common variant frequencies was found between the three control populations, aside from HLA-DRB1*1501 tag SNP rs9271069. This SNP had a significantly higher risk allele frequency in Orkney (0.23, p-value = 8 x 10-13) and Shetland (0.21, p-value = 2.3 x 10-6) than mainland Scotland (0.17). This difference in frequency is estimated to account for 6 (95% CI 3, 8) out of 150 observed excess cases per 100,000 individuals in Shetland and 9 (95% CI 8, 11) of the observed 257 excess cases per 100,000 individuals in Orkney, compared with mainland Scotland. Common variants therefore appear to account for little of the excess burden of MS in the Northern Isles of Scotland.

  2. d

    Islands of Aitcho Islands (South Shetland Islands)

    • deepfo.com
    csv, excel, html, xml
    Updated Feb 27, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Deepfo.com by Polyolbion SL, Barcelona, Spain (2020). Islands of Aitcho Islands (South Shetland Islands) [Dataset]. https://deepfo.com/en/most/Islands-of-Aitcho-Islands-South-Shetland-Islands
    Explore at:
    excel, csv, xml, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 27, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Deepfo.com by Polyolbion SL, Barcelona, Spain
    License

    https://deepfo.com/documentacion.php?idioma=enhttps://deepfo.com/documentacion.php?idioma=en

    Area covered
    Shetland Islands, South Shetland Islands, Aitcho Islands
    Description

    Islands of Aitcho Islands (South Shetland Islands). name, geology, archipelago, Area, latitude, Length, waterbody, longitude, population, country

  3. S

    Data from: The Rapid Population Collapse of a Key Marine Predator in the...

    • data.subak.org
    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    csv
    Updated Feb 15, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Figshare (2023). The Rapid Population Collapse of a Key Marine Predator in the Northern Antarctic Peninsula Endangers Genetic Diversity and Resilience to Climate Change [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.796488.s002
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Figshare
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Antarctic Peninsula, Antarctica
    Description

    Antarctic fur seals (AFS) are an ecologically important predator and a focal indicator species for ecosystem-based Antarctic fisheries management. This species suffered intensive anthropogenic exploitation until the early 1900s, but recolonized most of its former distribution, including the southern-most colony at Cape Shirreff, South Shetland Islands (SSI). The IUCN describes a single, global AFS population of least concern; however, extensive genetic analyses clearly identify four distinct breeding stocks, including one in the SSI. To update the population status of SSI AFS, we analyzed 20 years of field-based data including population counts, body size and condition, natality, recruitment, foraging behaviors, return rates, and pup mortality at the largest SSI colony. Our findings show a precipitous decline in AFS abundance (86% decrease since 2007), likely driven by leopard seal predation (increasing since 2001, p << 0.001) and potentially worsening summer foraging conditions. We estimated that leopard seals consumed an average of 69.3% (range: 50.3–80.9%) of all AFS pups born each year since 2010. AFS foraging-trip durations, an index of their foraging habitat quality, were consistent with decreasing krill and fish availability. Significant improvement in the age-specific over-winter body condition of AFS indicates that observed population declines are driven by processes local to the northern Antarctic Peninsula. The loss of SSI AFS would substantially reduce the genetic diversity of the species, and decrease its resilience to climate change. There is an urgent need to reevaluate the conservation status of Antarctic fur seals, particularly for the rapidly declining SSI population.

  4. Population of Scotland 2023, by council area

    • statista.com
    Updated Oct 25, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Population of Scotland 2023, by council area [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/865968/scottish-regional-population-estimates/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 25, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    Scotland
    Description

    In 2023, there were approximately 631,970 people living in Glasgow, with a further 523,250 people living in the Scottish capital, Edinburgh, the first and second most-populated Scottish council areas respectively. The region of Fife is also heavily populated, with approximately 373,210 people living there. The least populated areas are the islands of Scotland such as Orkney, estimated to have only 22,000 people there.

  5. d

    Tab.1: Tabulation of pinguin population within the Antarctic Peninsula...

    • b2find.dkrz.de
    • doi.pangaea.de
    • +2more
    Updated Oct 22, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2023). Tab.1: Tabulation of pinguin population within the Antarctic Peninsula region [Dataset]. https://b2find.dkrz.de/dataset/24384b10-83e3-539f-9671-dbbc37da7652
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 22, 2023
    Area covered
    Antarctic Peninsula, Antarctica
    Description

    Six species of penguins breed on the Antarctic continent, the Antarctic Peninsula, the South Shetland and South Orkney Islands. Their breeding populations within the Antarctic Peninsula, and the South Orkney and South Shetland Is., and estimates of global populations are given. Typical breeding seasons are also presented, but it must be noted that these will vary inter-annually and intra-annually under the influence of factors such as sea-ice extent and ENSO (interannual) and the location of each breeding colony (southerly localities will be later than northerly localities, as their breeding season is "compressed" within the shorter summer). Their foraging strategies (categorized as near-shore or offshore) and typical durations of foraging trips are also tabulated. As with breeding season events, foraging behaviour will vary intra-seasonally and inter-seasonally (in terms of dive duration, dive depth, foraging location, etc). The distribution of known penguin breeding colonies is circum-continental, with Emperor and Adelie penguins predominant on approximately 75 % of the coast, with two major concentrations in the Ross Sea and in Prydz Bay. The third concentration is in the Antarctic Peninsula region, where some of the largest penguin colonies are present. All six species breed within the area (predominantly Chinstrap Penguins), and the Peninsula region has a greater diversity than the remainder ofthe Antarctic with respect to penguins. The distribution at sea of nonbreeding penguins is less cIear. Non-breeding individuals of all six species move throughout the Southern Ocean, and in many cases, to areas well north of the winter pack-ice zone. However, it is not possible to estimate densities of penguins at sea as there are no estimates of non-breeding penguin populations the extent of their travels.

  6. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
University of Edinburgh. Centre for Global Health Research. Usher Institute (2021). Polygenic risk scores and GWAS summary statistics for an analysis of the contribution of common risk variants to multiple sclerosis in Orkney and Shetland [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7488/ds/2992

Polygenic risk scores and GWAS summary statistics for an analysis of the contribution of common risk variants to multiple sclerosis in Orkney and Shetland

Explore at:
txt(0.0036 MB), txt(0.0166 MB)Available download formats
Dataset updated
Feb 26, 2021
Dataset provided by
University of Edinburgh. Centre for Global Health Research. Usher Institute
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Area covered
Orkney, Orkney and Shetland, UNITED KINGDOM
Description

Orkney and Shetland, the population isolates which make up the Northern Isles of Scotland, are of particular interest to multiple sclerosis (MS) research. While MS prevalence is high in Scotland, Orkney has the highest global prevalence, higher than more northerly Shetland. Many hypotheses for the excess of MS cases in Orkney have been investigated, including vitamin D deficiency and homozygosity: neither was found to cause the high prevalence of MS. It is possible that this excess prevalence may be explained through unique genetics. We used polygenic risk scores (PRS) to look at the contribution of common risk variants to MS. Analyses were conducted using ORCADES (97/2118 cases/controls), VIKING (15/2000 cases/controls) and Generation Scotland (30/8708 cases/controls) datasets. However, no evidence of a difference in MS associated common variant frequencies was found between the three control populations, aside from HLA-DRB1*1501 tag SNP rs9271069. This SNP had a significantly higher risk allele frequency in Orkney (0.23, p-value = 8 x 10-13) and Shetland (0.21, p-value = 2.3 x 10-6) than mainland Scotland (0.17). This difference in frequency is estimated to account for 6 (95% CI 3, 8) out of 150 observed excess cases per 100,000 individuals in Shetland and 9 (95% CI 8, 11) of the observed 257 excess cases per 100,000 individuals in Orkney, compared with mainland Scotland. Common variants therefore appear to account for little of the excess burden of MS in the Northern Isles of Scotland.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu