25 datasets found
  1. Population density in Tennessee 1960-2017

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 11, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Population density in Tennessee 1960-2017 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/594859/tennessee-population-density/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 11, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Tennessee, United States
    Description

    This graph shows the population density in the federal state of Tennessee from 1960 to 2017. In 2017, the population density of Tennessee stood at ***** residents per square mile of land area.

  2. T

    Tunisia TN: Population Density: People per Square Km

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Dec 15, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2024). Tunisia TN: Population Density: People per Square Km [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/tunisia/population-and-urbanization-statistics/tn-population-density-people-per-square-km
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2006 - Dec 1, 2017
    Area covered
    Tunisia
    Variables measured
    Population
    Description

    Tunisia TN: Population Density: People per Square Km data was reported at 74.228 Person/sq km in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 73.399 Person/sq km for 2016. Tunisia TN: Population Density: People per Square Km data is updated yearly, averaging 51.821 Person/sq km from Dec 1961 (Median) to 2017, with 57 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 74.228 Person/sq km in 2017 and a record low of 27.265 Person/sq km in 1961. Tunisia TN: Population Density: People per Square Km data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Tunisia – Table TN.World Bank.WDI: Population and Urbanization Statistics. Population density is midyear population divided by land area in square kilometers. Population is based on the de facto definition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status or citizenship--except for refugees not permanently settled in the country of asylum, who are generally considered part of the population of their country of origin. Land area is a country's total area, excluding area under inland water bodies, national claims to continental shelf, and exclusive economic zones. In most cases the definition of inland water bodies includes major rivers and lakes.; ; Food and Agriculture Organization and World Bank population estimates.; Weighted average;

  3. Data from: Coweeta site, station Johnson County, TN (FIPS 47091), study of...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Nichole Rosamilia; Christopher Boone; EcoTrends Project (2015). Coweeta site, station Johnson County, TN (FIPS 47091), study of human population density in units of numberPerKilometerSquared on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F4144%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Nichole Rosamilia; Christopher Boone; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1880 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Coweeta (CWT) contains human population density measurements in numberPerKilometerSquared units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  4. d

    Data from: Attributes for NHDplus Catchments (Version 1.1) for the...

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +2more
    pdf, zip
    Updated Jun 8, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2018). Attributes for NHDplus Catchments (Version 1.1) for the Conterminous United States: Population Density, 2000. [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/cabff63c99134024a8d8a9e80724f5d9/html
    Explore at:
    pdf, zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 8, 2018
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    description: This data set represents the average population density, in number of people per square kilometer multiplied by 10 for the year 2000, compiled for every catchment of NHDPlus for the conterminous United States. The source data set is the 2000 Population Density by Block Group for the Conterminous United States (Hitt, 2003). The NHDPlus Version 1.1 is an integrated suite of application-ready geospatial datasets that incorporates many of the best features of the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) and the National Elevation Dataset (NED). The NHDPlus includes a stream network (based on the 1:100,00-scale NHD), improved networking, naming, and value-added attributes (VAAs). NHDPlus also includes elevation-derived catchments (drainage areas) produced using a drainage enforcement technique first widely used in New England, and thus referred to as "the New England Method." This technique involves "burning in" the 1:100,000-scale NHD and when available building "walls" using the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD). The resulting modified digital elevation model (HydroDEM) is used to produce hydrologic derivatives that agree with the NHD and WBD. Over the past two years, an interdisciplinary team from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and contractors, found that this method produces the best quality NHD catchments using an automated process (USEPA, 2007). The NHDPlus dataset is organized by 18 Production Units that cover the conterminous United States. The NHDPlus version 1.1 data are grouped by the U.S. Geologic Survey's Major River Basins (MRBs, Crawford and others, 2006). MRB1, covering the New England and Mid-Atlantic River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Units 1 and 2. MRB2, covering the South Atlantic-Gulf and Tennessee River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Units 3 and 6. MRB3, covering the Great Lakes, Ohio, Upper Mississippi, and Souris-Red-Rainy River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Units 4, 5, 7 and 9. MRB4, covering the Missouri River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Units 10-lower and 10-upper. MRB5, covering the Lower Mississippi, Arkansas-White-Red, and Texas-Gulf River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Units 8, 11 and 12. MRB6, covering the Rio Grande, Colorado and Great Basin River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Units 13, 14, 15 and 16. MRB7, covering the Pacific Northwest River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Unit 17. MRB8, covering California River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Unit 18.; abstract: This data set represents the average population density, in number of people per square kilometer multiplied by 10 for the year 2000, compiled for every catchment of NHDPlus for the conterminous United States. The source data set is the 2000 Population Density by Block Group for the Conterminous United States (Hitt, 2003). The NHDPlus Version 1.1 is an integrated suite of application-ready geospatial datasets that incorporates many of the best features of the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) and the National Elevation Dataset (NED). The NHDPlus includes a stream network (based on the 1:100,00-scale NHD), improved networking, naming, and value-added attributes (VAAs). NHDPlus also includes elevation-derived catchments (drainage areas) produced using a drainage enforcement technique first widely used in New England, and thus referred to as "the New England Method." This technique involves "burning in" the 1:100,000-scale NHD and when available building "walls" using the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD). The resulting modified digital elevation model (HydroDEM) is used to produce hydrologic derivatives that agree with the NHD and WBD. Over the past two years, an interdisciplinary team from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and contractors, found that this method produces the best quality NHD catchments using an automated process (USEPA, 2007). The NHDPlus dataset is organized by 18 Production Units that cover the conterminous United States. The NHDPlus version 1.1 data are grouped by the U.S. Geologic Survey's Major River Basins (MRBs, Crawford and others, 2006). MRB1, covering the New England and Mid-Atlantic River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Units 1 and 2. MRB2, covering the South Atlantic-Gulf and Tennessee River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Units 3 and 6. MRB3, covering the Great Lakes, Ohio, Upper Mississippi, and Souris-Red-Rainy River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Units 4, 5, 7 and 9. MRB4, covering the Missouri River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Units 10-lower and 10-upper. MRB5, covering the Lower Mississippi, Arkansas-White-Red, and Texas-Gulf River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Units 8, 11 and 12. MRB6, covering the Rio Grande, Colorado and Great Basin River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Units 13, 14, 15 and 16. MRB7, covering the Pacific Northwest River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Unit 17. MRB8, covering California River basins, contains NHDPlus Production Unit 18.

  5. T

    Tunisia TN: Population Density: Inhabitants per sq km

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Dec 15, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2024). Tunisia TN: Population Density: Inhabitants per sq km [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/tunisia/social-demography-non-oecd-member-annual/tn-population-density-inhabitants-per-sq-km
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2011 - Dec 1, 2022
    Area covered
    Tunisia
    Description

    Tunisia TN: Population Density: Inhabitants per sq km data was reported at 78.010 Person in 2022. This records an increase from the previous number of 77.550 Person for 2021. Tunisia TN: Population Density: Inhabitants per sq km data is updated yearly, averaging 66.600 Person from Dec 1990 (Median) to 2022, with 33 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 78.010 Person in 2022 and a record low of 53.580 Person in 1990. Tunisia TN: Population Density: Inhabitants per sq km data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Tunisia – Table TN.OECD.GGI: Social: Demography: Non OECD Member: Annual.

  6. M

    Tennessee Median Household Income (1984-2023)

    • macrotrends.net
    csv
    Updated Jun 30, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    MACROTRENDS (2025). Tennessee Median Household Income (1984-2023) [Dataset]. https://www.macrotrends.net/4301/tennessee-median-household-income
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    MACROTRENDS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    1984 - 2023
    Area covered
    United States, Tennessee
    Description

    Household data are collected as of March.

    As stated in the Census's "Source and Accuracy of Estimates for Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011" (http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/p60_243sa.pdf):

    Estimation of Median Incomes. The Census Bureau has changed the methodology for computing median income over time. The Census Bureau has computed medians using either Pareto interpolation or linear interpolation. Currently, we are using linear interpolation to estimate all medians. Pareto interpolation assumes a decreasing density of population within an income interval, whereas linear interpolation assumes a constant density of population within an income interval. The Census Bureau calculated estimates of median income and associated standard errors for 1979 through 1987 using Pareto interpolation if the estimate was larger than $20,000 for people or $40,000 for families and households. This is because the width of the income interval containing the estimate is greater than $2,500.

    We calculated estimates of median income and associated standard errors for 1976, 1977, and 1978 using Pareto interpolation if the estimate was larger than $12,000 for people or $18,000 for families and households. This is because the width of the income interval containing the estimate is greater than $1,000. All other estimates of median income and associated standard errors for 1976 through 2011 (2012 ASEC) and almost all of the estimates of median income and associated standard errors for 1975 and earlier were calculated using linear interpolation.

    Thus, use caution when comparing median incomes above $12,000 for people or $18,000 for families and households for different years. Median incomes below those levels are more comparable from year to year since they have always been calculated using linear interpolation. For an indication of the comparability of medians calculated using Pareto interpolation with medians calculated using linear interpolation, see Series P-60, Number 114, Money Income in 1976 of Families and Persons in the United States (www2.census.gov/prod2/popscan/p60-114.pdf).

  7. U.S. real per capita GDP 2024, by state

    • statista.com
    Updated Aug 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. real per capita GDP 2024, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/248063/per-capita-us-real-gross-domestic-product-gdp-by-state/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 1, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2024
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Out of all 50 states, New York had the highest per-capita real gross domestic product (GDP) in 2024, at 92,341 U.S. dollars, followed closely by Massachusetts. Mississippi had the lowest per-capita real GDP, at 41,603 U.S. dollars. While not a state, the District of Columbia had a per capita GDP of more than 210,780 U.S. dollars. What is real GDP? A country’s real GDP is a measure that shows the value of the goods and services produced by an economy and is adjusted for inflation. The real GDP of a country helps economists to see the health of a country’s economy and its standard of living. Downturns in GDP growth can indicate financial difficulties, such as the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, when the U.S. GDP decreased by 2.5 percent. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on U.S. GDP, shrinking the economy 2.8 percent. The U.S. economy rebounded in 2021, however, growing by nearly six percent. Why real GDP per capita matters Real GDP per capita takes the GDP of a country, state, or metropolitan area and divides it by the number of people in that area. Some argue that per-capita GDP is more important than the GDP of a country, as it is a good indicator of whether or not the country’s population is getting wealthier, thus increasing the standard of living in that area. The best measure of standard of living when comparing across countries is thought to be GDP per capita at purchasing power parity (PPP) which uses the prices of specific goods to compare the absolute purchasing power of a countries currency.

  8. Data from: Coweeta site, station Hamblen County, TN (FIPS 47063), study of...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ted Gragson; Christopher Boone; Michael R. Haines; Nichole Rosamilia; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project (2015). Coweeta site, station Hamblen County, TN (FIPS 47063), study of human population density in units of numberPerKilometerSquared on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F4122%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Ted Gragson; Christopher Boone; Michael R. Haines; Nichole Rosamilia; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1880 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Coweeta (CWT) contains human population density measurements in numberPerKilometerSquared units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  9. U.S. metropolitan areas with the highest percentage of Black population 2023...

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. metropolitan areas with the highest percentage of Black population 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/432650/us-metropolitan-areas-with-the-highest-percentage-of-black-population/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This statistics shows the leading metropolitan areas with the highest percentage of Black population in the United States in 2023. Among the 81 largest metropolitan areas, Memphis, Tennessee was ranked first with ** percent of residents reporting as Black or African-Americans in 2023.

  10. f

    River kilometer (RKM) and river mile (RM) for each site censused from...

    • plos.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 8, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tim Lane; Jess Jones; Brett Ostby; Robert Butler (2023). River kilometer (RKM) and river mile (RM) for each site censused from 2004–2014 in the Clinch River, TN. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256279.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 8, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Tim Lane; Jess Jones; Brett Ostby; Robert Butler
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Clinch River
    Description

    The total number of ¼ m2 quadrats excavated and raw number of individuals encountered in quadrats were used to estimate mean densities (mussels/m2) and 95% confidence limits (CL) for Epioblasma brevidens and E. capsaeformis by census year.

  11. 突尼斯 TN:人口密度:每平方公里人口

    • ceicdata.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com, 突尼斯 TN:人口密度:每平方公里人口 [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/zh-hans/tunisia/population-and-urbanization-statistics/tn-population-density-people-per-square-km
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2006 - Dec 1, 2017
    Area covered
    突尼斯
    Variables measured
    Population
    Description

    TN:人口密度:每平方公里人口在12-01-2017达74.228Person/sq km,相较于12-01-2016的73.399Person/sq km有所增长。TN:人口密度:每平方公里人口数据按年更新,12-01-1961至12-01-2017期间平均值为51.821Person/sq km,共57份观测结果。该数据的历史最高值出现于12-01-2017,达74.228Person/sq km,而历史最低值则出现于12-01-1961,为27.265Person/sq km。CEIC提供的TN:人口密度:每平方公里人口数据处于定期更新的状态,数据来源于World Bank,数据归类于全球数据库的突尼斯 – 表 TN.世行.WDI:人口和城市化进程统计。

  12. Walker Branch Watershed site, station Anderson County, TN (FIPS 47001),...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project (2015). Walker Branch Watershed site, station Anderson County, TN (FIPS 47001), study of human population density in units of numberPerKilometerSquared on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F15068%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1880 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Walker Branch Watershed (WBW) contains human population density measurements in numberPerKilometerSquared units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  13. Data from: Coweeta site, station Lebanon County, TN (FIPS 37087), study of...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Michael R. Haines; Christopher Boone; Nichole Rosamilia; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Ted Gragson; EcoTrends Project (2015). Coweeta site, station Lebanon County, TN (FIPS 37087), study of human population density in units of numberPerKilometerSquared on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F3902%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Michael R. Haines; Christopher Boone; Nichole Rosamilia; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Ted Gragson; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1880 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Coweeta (CWT) contains human population density measurements in numberPerKilometerSquared units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  14. Murder rate in U.S. metro areas with 250k or more residents in 2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Murder rate in U.S. metro areas with 250k or more residents in 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/718903/murder-rate-in-us-cities-in-2015/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2022, the New Orleans-Metairie, LA metro area recorded the highest homicide rate of U.S. cities with a population over 250,000, at **** homicides per 100,000 residents, followed by the Memphis, TN-MS-AR metro area. However, homicide data was not recorded in all U.S. metro areas, meaning that there may be some cities with a higher homicide rate. St. Louis St. Louis, which had a murder and nonnegligent manslaughter rate of **** in 2022, is the second-largest city by population in Missouri. It is home to many famous treasures, such as the St. Louis Cardinals baseball team, Washington University in St. Louis, the Saint Louis Zoo, and the renowned Gateway Arch. It is also home to many corporations, such as Monsanto, Arch Coal, and Emerson Electric. The economy of St. Louis is centered around business and healthcare, and boasts ten Fortune 500 companies. Crime in St. Louis Despite all of this, St. Louis suffers from high levels of crime and violence. As of 2023, it was listed as the seventh most dangerous city in the world as a result of their extremely high murder rate. Not only does St. Louis have one of the highest homicide rates in the United States, it also reports one of the highest numbers of violent crimes. Despite high crime levels, the GDP of the St. Louis metropolitan area has been increasing since 2001.

  15. f

    DataSheet1_Spatial distribution of non-point source pollution from total...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yunlong Zong; Sophia Shuang Chen; Giri Raj Kattel; Zheng Guo (2023). DataSheet1_Spatial distribution of non-point source pollution from total nitrogen and total phosphorous in the African city of Mwanza (Tanzania).docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1084031.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Yunlong Zong; Sophia Shuang Chen; Giri Raj Kattel; Zheng Guo
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Tanzania, Africa, Mwanza
    Description

    Rapid urbanization has caused widespread environmental pollution in Africa, restricting sustainable development programs. Today, non-point source pollution has become a major threat to many African cities. In this study, we have classified urban land use followed by the identification of urban functional areas based on multi-source data. We have then evaluated non-point source pollution based on nitrogen and phosphorus loads at a spatial scale in Mwanza city (Tanzania). We have estimated the spatial distribution of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) loads at a scale of 1 square kilometer grid. The results show that ① the built-up area of the city was identified as 28.9 km2, accounting for 6.8% of the total area of the city. The area of informal settlements was 56.9 km2, accounting for 13.4% of the total area of the city. About 90.38% of 2.41×105 kg of the total TN load and 87.23% of 4.00×104 kg of the total TP load in the city were derived from the informal settlements alone in 2020. ② The average load intensities of TN and TP in Mwanza city were 6.90 kg·hm-2·yr-1 and 1.14 kg·hm-2·yr-1, respectively. The average TN and TP intensities in Mwanza city were slightly higher than the average TN and TP load intensities in the Lake Victoria basin. However, given the high population density of the Mwanza city area, the average TN and TP intensities were found to be consistent. ③ The TN and TP pollution loads were relatively concentrated in the inner urban area, including the lower reaches of the Mirongo River basin, the eastern side of the Nyamagana Peninsula, and the lakeside area extending north and south from the peninsula, and gradually decreased toward the city’s outskirts. We propose that the identified riparian areas in our study should be prioritized as potentially key construction zones for pollution treatment plant facilities and urban renewal pilot programs for restraining the widespread informal settlements. This study contributes to the development of an innovative urban non-point source pollution control measure, which may be applicable to low-income countries in Africa and elsewhere.

  16. Data from: Coweeta site, station Cocke County, TN (FIPS 47029), study of...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nichole Rosamilia; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Michael R. Haines; Christopher Boone; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Ted Gragson; EcoTrends Project (2015). Coweeta site, station Cocke County, TN (FIPS 47029), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F4099%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Nichole Rosamilia; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Michael R. Haines; Christopher Boone; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Ted Gragson; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1810 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Coweeta (CWT) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  17. Data from: Coweeta site, station Polk County, TN (FIPS 47139), study of...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Christopher Boone; Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Nichole Rosamilia; EcoTrends Project (2015). Coweeta site, station Polk County, TN (FIPS 47139), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F4165%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Christopher Boone; Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Nichole Rosamilia; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1840 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Coweeta (CWT) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  18. Coweeta site, station Blount County, TN (FIPS 47009), study of percent urban...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Michael R. Haines; Christopher Boone; Ted Gragson; Nichole Rosamilia; EcoTrends Project (2015). Coweeta site, station Blount County, TN (FIPS 47009), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F4077%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Michael R. Haines; Christopher Boone; Ted Gragson; Nichole Rosamilia; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1800 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Coweeta (CWT) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  19. Data from: Coweeta site, station Lebanon County, TN (FIPS 37087), study of...

    • search.dataone.org
    • dataone.org
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Christopher Boone; Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Nichole Rosamilia; EcoTrends Project (2015). Coweeta site, station Lebanon County, TN (FIPS 37087), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F3901%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Christopher Boone; Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; Nichole Rosamilia; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1810 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Coweeta (CWT) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  20. Data from: Coweeta site, station Hamblen County, TN (FIPS 47063), study of...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ted Gragson; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Nichole Rosamilia; Christopher Boone; Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project (2015). Coweeta site, station Hamblen County, TN (FIPS 47063), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F4121%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    Ted Gragson; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Nichole Rosamilia; Christopher Boone; Michael R. Haines; U.S. Bureau of the Census; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1880 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Coweeta (CWT) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2025). Population density in Tennessee 1960-2017 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/594859/tennessee-population-density/
Organization logo

Population density in Tennessee 1960-2017

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jul 11, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
Tennessee, United States
Description

This graph shows the population density in the federal state of Tennessee from 1960 to 2017. In 2017, the population density of Tennessee stood at ***** residents per square mile of land area.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu